Search

Objective To compare patients with DKA, hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar syndrome (HHS), or mixed DKA-HHS and COVID-19 [COVID (+)] to COVID-19-negative (−) [COVID (−)] patients with DKA/HHS from a low-income, racially/ethnically diverse catchment area. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with patients admitted to an urban academic medical center between 1 March and 30 July 2020. Eligible patients met lab criteria for either DKA or HHS. Mixed DKA-HHS was defined as meeting all criteria for either DKA or HHS with at least 1 criterion for the other diagnosis. Results A total of 82 participants were stratified by COVID-19 status and type of hyperglycaemic crisis [26 COVID (+) and 56 COVID (−)]. A majority were either Black or Hispanic. Compared with COVID (−) patients, COVID (+) patients were older, more Hispanic and more likely to have type 2 diabetes (T2D, 73% vs 48%, p

A safety-net hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, made adaptations to its Nourishing Our Community Program to accommodate restrictions brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic to continue providing food and education to patients. While participation in programs decreased overall, some of the adaptations made, including virtual classes and food pantry home delivery, were well received and are planned to be maintained after the pandemic subsides. By making adjustments to operational procedures, the Nourishing Our Community Program continued to reach its underserved population despite pandemic challenges.

The Texas Medicaid Waiver, via the Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) program, has provided a path for Texas to achieve the Triple Aim through its focus on a defined population at the project and system levels, and financial payment policy based on outcomes. Both iterations of the DSRIP program (Waiver 1.0 and 2.0) have helped define populations, created regional collaboration that sets the stage for a true integrator, and provided financial incentives for improving population health, enhancing patient experience, and controlling costs. The flexible design of project menus and measure bundles in DSRIP encouraged a variety of projects, numerous measures of success and (often) overlapping populations of individual served to achieve the ultimate goal of the Triple Aim. This research outlines the major features of Texas DSRIP and demonstrates the Medicaid Waiver effectively contributed to measurable improvements in health, suggesting Texas safety net providers are moving closer to Triple Aim achievement.

This study assesses the current practices of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) to address tobacco cessation with patients. A national sample of 112 FQHC medical directors completed the web-based survey. Frequently endorsed barriers to providing tobacco cessation services were: patients lacking insurance coverage (35%), limited transportation (27%), and variance in coverage of cessation services by insurance type (26%). Nearly 50% indicated that two or more tobacco cessation resources met the needs of their patients; 25% had one resource, and the remaining 25% had no resources. There were no differences among resource groups in the use of electronic health record (EHR) best-practice-alerts for tobacco use or in the perceived barriers to providing tobacco cessation assistance. Systems changes to harmonize coverage of tobacco assistance, such as broader accessibility to evidence-based cessation services could have a positive impact on the efforts of FQHCs to provide tobacco cessation assistance to their patients.

BACKGROUND: Although most American patients with ESKD become eligible for Medicare by their fourth month of dialysis, some never do. Information about where patients with limited health insurance receive maintenance dialysis has been lacking. METHODS: We identified patients initiating maintenance dialysis (2008–2015) from the US Renal Data System, defining patients as “safety-net reliant” if they were uninsured or had only Medicaid coverage at dialysis onset and had not qualified for Medicare by the fourth dialysis month. We examined four dialysis facility ownership categories according to for-profit/nonprofit status and ownership (chain versus independent). We assessed whether patients who were safety-net reliant were more likely to initiate dialysis at certain facility types. We also examined hospital-based affiliation. RESULTS: The proportion of patients

Collaborative visit agenda setting between patient and doctor is recommended. We assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of patients attending a large primary care safety-net clinic typing their agendas into the electronic visit note before seeing their clinicians. One hundred and one patients and their 28 clinicians completed post-visit surveys. Patients and clinicians agreed that the agendas improved patient-clinician communication (patients 79%, clinician 74%), and wanted to continue having patients type agendas in the future (73%, 82%). Enabling patients to type visit agendas may enhance care by engaging patients and giving clinicians an efficient way to prioritize patients' concerns.

US hospitals that care for vulnerable populations, "safety-net hospitals" (SNHs), are more likely to incur penalties under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, which penalizes hospitals with higher-than-expected readmissions. Understanding whether SNHs face unique barriers to reducing readmissions or whether they underuse readmission-prevention strategies is important.We surveyed leadership at 1600 US acute care hospitals, of whom 980 participated, between June 2013 and January 2014. Responses on 28 questions on readmission-related barriers and strategies were compared between SNHs and non-SNHs, adjusting for nonresponse and sampling strategy. We further compared responses between high-performing SNHs and low-performing SNHs.We achieved a 62% response rate. SNHs were more likely to report patient-related barriers, including lack of transportation, homelessness, and language barriers compared with non-SNHs (P-values0.001). Despite reporting more barriers, SNHs were less likely to use e-tools to share discharge summaries (70.1% vs. 73.7%, P0.04) or verbally communicate (31.5% vs. 39.8%, P0.001) with outpatient providers, track readmissions by race/ethnicity (23.9% vs. 28.6%, P0.001), or enroll patients in postdischarge programs (13.3% vs. 17.2%, P0.001). SNHs were also less likely to use discharge coordinators, pharmacists, and postdischarge programs. When we examined the use of strategies within SNHs, we found trends to suggest that high-performing SNHs were more likely to use several readmission strategies.Despite reporting more barriers to reducing readmissions, SNHs were less likely to use readmission-reduction strategies. This combination of higher barriers and lower use of strategies may explain why SNHs have higher rates of readmissions and penalties under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.

Integrative group medical visits (IGMVs) are a compelling health service delivery innovation, which create an opportunity to expand access to complementary and integrative health care (CIH). IGMVs ...

Background: Non-medical switching refers to a change in a stable patient’s prescribed medication to a clinically distinct, non-generic, alternative for reasons other than poor clinical response, side-effects or non-adherence. Objective: To assess the perceptions of high-volume Medicare and/or Medicaid physician providers regarding the impact non-medical switching has on their patients’ medication-related outcomes and health-care utilization. Methods: We performed an e-survey of high-volume Medicare and/or Medicaid physicians (spending >50% of their time caring for Medicare and/or Medicaid patients), practicing for >2 years but

Hai Fang and colleagues highlight the need for better financial protection for poor people

This cross-sectional study uses electronic health record data to evaluate the association between COVID-19 and breast cancer screening at an urban integrated health system’s safety-net hospital between September 2019 and January 2021.

Hospital systems increasingly utilize pharmacogenomic testing to inform clinical prescribing. Successful implementation efforts have been modeled at many academic centers. In contrast, this report provides insights into the formation of a pharmacogenomics consultation service at a safety-net hospital, which predominantly serves low-income, uninsured, and vulnerable populations. The report describes the INdiana GENomics Implementation: an Opportunity for the UnderServed (INGENIOUS) trial and addresses concerns of adjudication, credentialing, and funding.

BACKGROUND: One of the potential benefits of insurance reform is greater stability of insurance and reduced coverage disparities by race and ethnicity. OBJECTIVES: We examined the temporal trends in insurance coverage by racial/ethnic group before and after Massachusetts Insurance Reform by abstracting records across two urban safety net hospital systems. RESEARCH DESIGN: We examined adjusted odds of being uninsured and incident rate ratios of gaining and losing insurance over time by race and ethnicity. We used billing records to capture the payer for each episode of care. SUBJECTS: We included data from January 2005 through December 2013 on patients with hypertension between the ages of 21 and 64 years. We compared four racial and ethnic groups: non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian and Hispanic. MEASURES: We examined individual patients’ insurance coverage status in 6 month intervals. We compared odds of being uninsured in the transition and post insurance reform period to the pre reform period, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities practice location and education and income by Census tract. RESULTS: Among 48,291 patients with hypertension, reduction in rates of uninsurance with insurance reform was greater for Hispanic (29.7%), non-Hispanic Black (24.8%) and non-Hispanic Asian (26.8%) than non-Hispanic White (14.9%) patients. The odds of becoming uninsured were reduced in all racial and ethnic groups (OR 0.27–0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Massachusetts Insurance Reform resulted in stable insurance coverage and a reduction in disparities in insurance instability by race and ethnicity.

Objective To operationalize constructs from each of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains and to present psychometric properties within the context of evidence-based approaches for promoting colorectal cancer screening in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Methods Data were collected from FQHC clinics across seven states. A web-based Staff Survey and a Clinic Characteristics Survey were completed by staff and leaders (n = 277) from 59 FQHCs. Results Internal reliability of scales was adequate ranging from 0.62 for compatibility to 0.88 for other personal attributes (openness). Intraclass correlations for the scales indicated that 2.4 percent to 20.9 percent of the variance in scale scores occurs within clinics. Discriminant validity was adequate at the clinic level, with all correlations less than 0.75. Convergent validity was more difficult to assess given lack of hypothesized associations between factors expected to predict implementation. Conclusions Our results move the field forward by describing initial psychometric properties of constructs across CFIR domains.

Screening with FIT or colonoscopy can reduce CRC mortality. In our pragmatic, randomized trial of screening outreach over three years, patients annually received mailed FITs or colonoscopy invitations. We examined screening initiation after each mailing and crossover from the invited to other modality. Eligible patients (50–64 years, ≥1 primary-care visit before randomization, and no history of CRC) received mailed FIT kits (n = 2400) or colonoscopy invitations (n = 2400) from March 2013 through July 2016. Among those invited for colonoscopy, we used multinomial logistic regression to identify factors associated with screening initiation with colonoscopy vs. FIT vs. no screening after the first mailing. Most patients were female (61.8%) and Hispanic (48.9%) or non-Hispanic black (24.0%). Among those invited for FIT, 56.6% (n = 1359) initiated with FIT, whereas 3.3% (n = 78) crossed over to colonoscopy; 151 (15.7%) and 61 (7.7%) initiated with FIT after second and third mailings. Among those invited for colonoscopy, 25.5% (n = 613) initiated with colonoscopy whereas 18.8% (n = 452) crossed over to FIT; 112 (8.4%) and 48 (4.2%) initiated with colonoscopy after second and third mailings. Three or more primary-care visits prior to randomization were associated with initiating with colonoscopy (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.17–1.91) and crossing over to FIT (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.19–2.23). Although nearly half of patients initiated screening after the first mailing, few non-responders in either outreach group initiated after a second or third mailing. More patients invited to colonoscopy crossed over to FIT than those assigned to FIT crossed over to colonoscopy.

Background: Nearly half of Americans with diagnosed hypertension have uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) while some integrated healthcare systems, such as Kaiser Permanente Northern California, have achieved control rates upwards 90%. Methods and Results: We adapted Kaiser Permanente’s evidence-based treatment protocols in a racially and ethnically diverse population at 12 safety-net clinics in the San Francisco Health Network. The intervention consisted of 4 elements: a hypertension registry, a simplified treatment intensification protocol that included fixed-dose combination medications containing diuretics, standardized BP measurement protocol, and BP check visits led by registered nurse and pharmacist staff. The study population comprised patients with hypertension who made ≥1 primary care visits within the past 24 months (n=15 917) and had a recorded BP measurement within the past 12 months. We conducted a postintervention time series analysis from August 2014 to August 2016 to assess the effect of the intervention on BP control for 24 months for the pilot site and for 15 months for 11 other San Francisco Health Network clinics combined. Secondary outcomes were changes in use of guideline-recommended medication prescribing. Rates of BP control increased at the pilot site (68%–74%; P P P P P Conclusions: Evidence-based system approaches to improving BP control can be implemented in safety-net settings and could play a pivotal role in achieving improved population BP control and reducing hypertension disparities.

Introduction: Oral anticancer medications (OAMs) offer convenient administration but create new challenges with unique toxicity profiles, specific monitoring parameters and non-continuous dosing schedules. We evaluated provider compliance with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labeling-specified monitoring parameters for commonly dispensed OAMs at a public academic health system. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients receiving OAMs was conducted at Grady Health System between July 2015 and June 2016. Patients included in the evaluation were dispensed one of the ten most common OAMs used in our cancer center. Laboratory data and provider documentation were collected and compared to FDA drug labeling-specified monitoring parameters, and the primary outcome was the percentage of fully-compliant cycles. Secondary outcomes included patient adherence assessed by provider documentation and fill history. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the data. Results: The initial report comprised 422 patients, of which 77 patients with a total of 349 treatment cycles were included for final analysis. One hundred twenty-six (36.1%) of the treatment cycles were fully compliant with the FDA drug labeling-specified monitoring parameters. Sixty-four of the 199 (32.2%) applicable clinic notes documented patient adherence, and 15 (39.5%) of 38 patients were adherent based on fill history. Conclusion: This study revealed low compliance with FDA-recommended monitoring parameters for commonly dispensed OAMs at our institution. In addition, this study confirmed national concerns about adherence to oral regimens. It also suggests that provider compliance with monitoring parameters is an area that needs to be addressed in order to improve the ambulatory OAM process.

Background Despite advances in antivirals, disparities in hepatitis C (HCV) treatment remain. We evaluated persons diagnosed with HCV in 4 safety net sites in a large Southeastern county, using care cascades to conceptualize milestones in treatment. Methods Persons diagnosed with HCV in 4 screening sites across Durham County, North Carolina, from December 2015 to May 2018 were included, allowing for 9 months of follow-up. Sites included the county health department (CHD), a federally qualified health center (FQHC) where providers trained in HCV care, jail and community outreach. Persons with HCV were eligible for a bridge counselor intervention to enhance linkage to care with an HCV-treating provider (either primary care or specialist). Outcomes were monitored by chart review. Persons linked to care in the prison (n = 36) were censored from subsequent cascade steps due to inability to obtain records. Cascades were compared by the site of diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of being prescribed antivirals. Results 505 persons were diagnosed with HCV: 216 in the FQHC, 158 in the jail, 72 in the CHD, and 59 in community outreach. Overall, 89% were counseled on their diagnosis, 65% were linked to care, 41% prescribed antivirals, 38% started medications, 34% completed medications and 24% achieved sustained viral response at 12 weeks (SVR-12). Progression through the cascade was highest for those diagnosed at the FQHC (figure). In analyses adjusted for demographics and risk factors, diagnosis in a community outreach setting had lower odds of antiviral prescription, compared with diagnosis in the FQHC (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12–0.89). Linkage to care at a specialist clinic (vs. primary care) was associated with antiviral prescription (OR 3.82, CI 1.95–7.46). Sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status and HCV risk factors were not associated with antiviral prescription. Conclusion Among persons diagnosed with HCV across four safety net sites, a quarter achieved SVR-12. Those diagnosed in community outreach had lower odds of antiviral prescription, and those who were linked to a specialist were more likely to receive antiviral prescription. Improving progression through cascade milestones across safety-net settings is integral to improving population-based HCV outcomes. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is expected to reduce the number of uninsured people in the United States during the next eight years, but more than 10% are expected to remain uninsured. Uninsured people are one of the main populations using publicly funded safety net sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention services. Estimating the proportion of the uninsured population expected to need STD services could help identify the potential demand for safety net STD services and improve program planning. In 2013, an estimated 8.27 million people met the criteria for being in need of STD services. In 2023, 4.70 million uninsured people are expected to meet the criteria for being in need of STD services. As an example, the cost in 2014 U.S. dollars of providing chlamydia screening to these people was an estimated $271.1 million in 2013 and is estimated to be $153.8 million in 2023. A substantial need will continue to exist for safety net STD prevention services in coming years.

© 2015, Society of General Internal Medicine.Background: Little is known about hospitalization-associated disability (HAD) in older adults who receive care in safety-net hospitals. Objectives: To describe HAD and to examine its association with age in adults aged 55 and older hospitalized in a safety-net hospital. Design: Secondary post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort from a discharge intervention trial, the Support from Hospital to Home for Elders. Setting: Medicine, cardiology, and neurology inpatient services of San Francisco General Hospital, a safety-net hospital. Participants: A total of 583 participants 55 and older who spoke English, Spanish, or Chinese. We determined the incidence of HAD 30 days post-hospitalization and ORs for HAD by age group. Measurements: The outcome measure was death or HAD at 30 days after hospital discharge. HAD is defined as a new or additional disability in one or more activities of daily living (ADL) that is present at hospital discharge compared to baseline. Participants’ functional status at baseline (2 weeks prior to admission) and 30 days post-discharge was ascertained by self-report of ADL function. Results: Many participants (75.3 %) were functionally independent at baseline. By age group, HAD occurred as follows: 27.4 % in ages 55–59, 22.2 % in ages 60–64, 17.4 % in ages 65–69, 30.3 % in ages 70–79, and 61.7 % in ages 80 or older. Compared to the youngest group, only the adjusted OR for HAD in adults over 80 was significant, at 2.45 (95 % CI 1.17, 5.15). Conclusions: In adults at a safety-net hospital, HAD occurred in similar proportions among adults aged 55–59 and those aged 70–79, and was highest in the oldest adults, aged ≥ 80. In safety-net hospitals, interventions to reduce HAD among patients 70 years and older should consider expanding age criteria to adults as young as 55.

BACKGROUND: For many individuals, the implementation of the US Affordable Care Act will involve a transition from public to private health care venues for sexually transmitted infection (STI) care and prevention. To anticipate challenges primary care providers may face and to inform the future role of publicly funded STI clinics, it is useful to consider their current functions. METHODS: Data collected by 40 STI clinics that are a part of the Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance Network were used to describe patient demographic and behavioral characteristics, STI diagnoses, and laboratory testing data in 2010 and 2011. RESULTS: A total of 608,536 clinic visits were made by 363,607 unique patients. Most patients (61.9%) were male; 21.9% of men reported sex with men (MSM). Roughly half of patients were 20 to 29 years old (47.1%) and non-Hispanic black (56.2%). There were 212,765 STI diagnoses (mostly nonreportable) that required clinical examinations. A high volume of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and HIV testing was performed (>350,000 tests); the prevalence was 11.5% for chlamydia, 5.8% for gonorrhea, 0.9% for HIV, and varied greatly by sex and MSM status. Among MSM with chlamydia or gonorrhea, 40.1% (1811/4448) of chlamydial and 46.2% (3370/7300) of gonococcal infections were detected at extragenital sites. CONCLUSIONS: Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance Network clinics served populations with high STI rates. Given experience with diagnoses of both nonreportable and reportable STIs and extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, STI clinics comprise a critical specialty network in STI diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

Access to health insurance and health care are critical for people living in rural communities, where the safety net is fragile. However, rural communities face challenges as they enroll uninsured people in the health insurance marketplace, educate newly insured individuals on how to use insurance, and coordinate care for those who remain uninsured.

Objectives. We identified Minnesota’s initial dental therapy employers and surveyed dental safety net providers’ perceptions of dental therapy. Methods. In July 2011, we surveyed 32 Minnesota dental safety net providers to assess their prospective views on dental therapy employment options. In October 2013, we used an employment scan to reveal characteristics of the early adopters of dental therapy. Results. Before the availability of licensed dental therapists, safety net dental clinic directors overwhelmingly (77%) supported dental therapy. As dental therapists have become licensed over the past 2 years, the early employers of dental therapists are safety net clinics. Conclusions. Although the concept of dental therapy remains controversial in Minnesota, it now has a firm foundation in the state’s safety net clinics. Dental therapists are being used in innovative and diverse ways, so, as dental therapy continues to evolve, further research to identify best practices for incorporating dental therapists into the oral health care team is needed.

Background Adoption of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) is accelerating due to proven safety and value, but experience in safety-net settings remains limited, especially in those with history of illicit drug use. Emerging reports from safety-net settings have featured OPAT delivered in nursing facilities, respite care centers, and infusion centers (including some persons who inject drugs [PWID]), but literature is sparse on home-based OPAT for vulnerable patients. In a new home antibiotics program at San Francisco General Hospital, we sought to describe early safety and efficacy outcomes among adults without active injection drug use but with high rates of substance use and comorbid illnesses. Methods We conducted a cohort study of patients discharged from a large urban county medical center and enrolled in an outpatient IV antibiotics program from September 2017 to January 2019. We collected demographic and clinical data and computed outcomes of safety (30- and 90-day readmission for infection, vascular access complications, and death) and efficacy (completion of antibiotic therapy). Results Overall, 47 courses of antibiotics were given to 45 patients. Of these, 39/47 (83%) of antibiotic courses were administered in a residential setting, and 8/47 (17%) via the hospital outpatient infusion center. Comorbid conditions were common, including 9/45 (20%) with hepatitis B/C and 8/45 (18%) with HIV (Table 1). Present or prior illicit drug use was seen in 17/45 patients (38%), including recent or active illicit drug use in 11/45 (24%) (Table 1). Most common indications for antibiotics were osteomyelitis and bacteremia (Table 2). Efficacy in the OPAT program was high: overall, 44/47 (94%) courses of outpatient IV antibiotics were completed, and the 30-day and 90-day readmission rates were 13% and 20% respectively, with zero 30-day readmissions related to OPAT (Table 3). Conclusion An OPAT program embedded within a safety net hospital system delivering care in patients’ homes had high completion rate and low readmission rate, despite patients’ high prevalence of underlying comorbid conditions and noninjection illicit drug use. Home-based OPAT should be considered for broader adoption in safety-net hospital systems. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Background With the acceleration of the hepatitis C (HCV) epidemic in the United States and the ongoing public health impact of undetected human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection, there is a critical need for enhanced secondary prevention efforts where patients accessing care are not routinely screened. The purpose of this program was to implement routine opt-out HIV and HCV screenings in a high-volume urban emergency department (ED) through the use of an EMR enhancement to increase a provider’s likelihood of testing eligible patients, and to provide linkage to care for patients identified to have positive tests. Methods From November 27, 2018 to March 31, 2019, EMR-based HIV and HCV screening was implemented in a quaternary care ED in Northern California. EMR best practice alerts were developed based on a combination of local and CDC guidelines and populated on registered patients receiving blood laboratories or receiving STI testing. Laboratory HIV/HCV screening utilized a unique two-specimen collection scheme to enable molecular testing without requiring patient return visits. Patients were excluded if they chose to opt out from testing or the provider deemed opt out was not possible. Upon notification of a positive test result through the EMR, a patient navigator was responsible for providing disease education and linking patients to care. Results The prevalence of HCV antibody positivity was 9.6% (637/6,627) and 0.97% (55/5,628) for HIV. Of the 255 HCV-RNA positives, 110 were known and 145 newly diagnosed. Of the 90 HIV patients, 31 were known and 8 newly diagnosed. Although current CDC hepatitis C screening guidelines recommend screening all adults born during 1945–1965, we conducted universal screening of adults 18 years or older. Of those screened antibody-positive for HCV 64% fell within the 1945–1965 birth cohort. Conclusion Introducing routine opt-out testing using an automated EMR-based screening program is an effective method to identify and screen eligible patients for HIV and HCV in episodic care safety net settings where universal screenings are not routinely implemented. The unexpectedly high rate of HIV seroprevalence suggests the ED environment continues to be an important setting to access populations not receiving routine care despite longstanding CDC recommendations for universal screening. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

To examine the relationship between training during residency in a federally qualified health center (FQHC), rural health clinic (RHC), or critical access hospital (CAH) and subsequent practice in these settings.The authors identified residents who trained in safety net settings from 2001 to 2005 and in 2009 using 100% Medicare Part B claims files for FQHCs, RHCs, and CAHs and 2011 American Medical Association Masterfile residency start and end date histories. They used 2009 Medicare claims data to determine the relationship between this training and subsequent practice in safety net settings.The authors identified 662 residents who had a Medicare claim filed in their name by an RHC, 975 by an FQHC, and 1,793 by a CAH from 2001 to 2005 and in 2009. By 2009, that number of residents per year had declined for RHCs and FQHCs but increased substantially for CAHs. The percentage of physicians practicing in a safety net setting in 2009 who had trained in a similar setting from 2001 to 2005 was 38.1% (205/538) for RHCs, 31.2% (219/703) for FQHCs, and 52.6% (72/137) for CAHs.Using Medicare claims data, the authors identified residents who trained in safety net settings and demonstrated that many went on to practice in these settings. They recommend that graduate medical education policy support or expand training in these settings to meet the surge in health care demand that will occur with the enactment of the Affordable Care Act insurance provision in 2014.

Objectives. To compare health care use and spending of Medicaid enrollees seen at federally qualified health centers versus non–health center settings in a context of significant growth. Methods. Using fee-for-service Medicaid claims from 13 states in 2009, we compared patients receiving the majority of their primary care in federally qualified health centers with propensity score–matched comparison groups receiving primary care in other settings. Results. We found that health center patients had lower use and spending than did non–health center patients across all services, with 22% fewer visits and 33% lower spending on specialty care and 25% fewer admissions and 27% lower spending on inpatient care. Total spending was 24% lower for health center patients. Conclusions. Our analysis of 2009 Medicaid claims, which includes the largest sample of states and more recent data than do previous multistate claims studies, demonstrates that the health center program has provided a cost-efficient setting for primary care for Medicaid enrollees.

To assess whether differences in readmission rates between safety-net hospitals (SNH) and non-SNHs are due to differences in hospital quality, and to compare the results of hospital profiling with and without SES adjustment.In response to concerns that quality measures unfairly penalizes SNH, NQF recently recommended that performance measures adjust for socioeconomic status (SES) when SES is a risk factor for poor patient outcomes.Multivariate regression was used to examine the association between SNH status and 30-day readmission after major surgery. The results of hospital profiling with and without SES adjustment were compared using the CMS Hospital Compare and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) methodologies.Adjusting for patient risk and SES, patients admitted to SNHs were not more likely to be readmitted compared with patients in in non-SNHs (AOR 1.08; 95% CI:0.95-1.23; P = 0.23). The results of hospital profiling based on Hospital Compare were nearly identical with and without SES adjustment (ICC 0.99, κ 0.96). Using the HRRP threshold approach, 61% of SNHs were assigned to the penalty group versus 50% of non-SNHs. After adjusting for SES, 51% of SNHs were assigned to the penalty group.Differences in surgery readmissions between SNHs and non-SNHs are due to differences in the patient case mix of low-SES patients, and not due to differences in quality. Adjusting readmission measures for SES leads to changes in hospital ranking using the HRRP threshold approach, but not using the CMS Hospital Compare methodology. CMS should consider either adjusting for the effects of SES when calculating readmission thresholds for HRRP, or replace it with the approach used in Hospital Compare.

Women in safety-net institutions are less likely to receive cervical cancer screening. Human papilloma virus (HPV) self-sampling is an alternative method of cervical cancer screening. We examine the acceptability and feasibility of HPV self-sampling among patients and clinic staff in two safety-net clinics in Miami.Haitian and Latina women aged 30-65 years with no Pap smear in the past 3 years were recruited. Women were offered HPV self-sampling or traditional Pap smear screening. The acceptability of HPV self-sampling among patients and clinic staff was assessed. If traditional screening was preferred the medical record was reviewed.A total of 180 women were recruited (134 Latinas and 46 Haitian). HPV self-sampling was selected by 67% women. Among those selecting traditional screening, 22% were not screened 5 months postrecruitment. Over 80% of women agreed HPV self-sampling was faster, more private, easy to use, and would prefer to use again. Among clinic staff, 80% agreed they would be willing to incorporate HPV self-sampling into practice.HPV self-sampling was both acceptable and feasible to participants and clinic staff and may help overcome barriers to screening.

Objective Although provider recommendation is a key predictor of HPV vaccination, how providers verbalize recommendations particularly strong ones is unknown. We developed a tool to describe strength and content of provider recommendations. Methods We used electronic health records to identify unvaccinated adolescents with appointments at six safety-net clinics in Dallas, Texas. Clinic visit audio-recordings were qualitatively analyzed to identify provider recommendation types (presumptive vs. participatory introduction; strong vs. weak), describe content communicated, and explore patterns between recommendation type and vaccination. Results We analyzed 43 audio-recorded discussions between parents and 12 providers. Most providers used a participatory introduction (42 discussions) and made weak recommendations (24 discussions) by using passive voice or adding a qualification (e.g., not school required). Few providers (11 discussions) gave strong recommendations (clear, personally-owned endorsement). HPV vaccination was lowest for those receiving only weak recommendations and highest when providers coupled the recommendation with an adjacent rationale. Conclusion Our new tool provides initial evidence of how providers undercut their recommendations through qualifications or support them with a rationale. Most providers gave weak HPV vaccine recommendations and used a participatory introduction. Practice implications Providers would benefit from communication skills training on how to make explicit recommendations with an evidence-based rationale.

Delays in syphilis treatment may contribute to transmission. We evaluated time to treatment for symptomatic patients with syphilis by clinical testing site in 2 Arizona counties. Fewer patients were tested and treated at publicly funded sexually transmitted disease clinics, but received the timeliest treatment; these clinics remain crucial to syphilis disease control.

Objective: Even with treatment, approximately one-third of patients with bipolar disorder relapse into depression or mania within 1 year. Unfavorable clinical outcomes for patients with bipolar disorder include increased rates of psychiatric hospitalization and functional impairment. However, only a few studies have examined predictors of psychiatric hospital readmission in a sample of patients with bipolar disorder. The purpose of this study was to examine predictors of psychiatric readmission within 30 days, 90 days and 1 year of discharge among patients with bipolar disorder using a conceptual model adapted from Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Service Use. Methods: In this retrospective study, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted in a sample of 2443 adult patients with bipolar disorder who were consecutively admitted to a public psychiatric hospital in the United States from 1 January to 31 December 2013. Results: In the multivariate models, several enabling and need factors were significantly associated with an increased risk of readmission across all time periods examined, including being uninsured, having ⩾3 psychiatric hospitalizations and having a lower Global Assessment of Functioning score. Additional factors associated with psychiatric readmission within 30 and 90 days of discharge included patient homelessness. Patient race/ethnicity, bipolar disorder type or a current manic episode did not significantly predict readmission across all time periods examined; however, patients who were male were more likely to readmit within 1 year. The 30-day and 1-year multivariate models showed the best model fit. Conclusion: Our study found enabling and need factors to be the strongest predictors of psychiatric readmission, suggesting that the prevention of psychiatric readmission for patients with bipolar disorder at safety-net hospitals may be best achieved by developing and implementing innovative transitional care initiatives that address the issues of multiple psychiatric hospitalizations, housing instability, insurance coverage and functional impairment.

Mammography is the most effective method to detect breast cancer in its earliest stages, reducing the risk of breast cancer death. We investigated the relationship between accessibility of mammography services at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) of breast cancer in each county in the United States.County-level breast cancer mortality and incidence rates in 2006-2010 were used to estimate MIRs. We compared breast cancer MIRs based on the density and availability of FQHC delivery sites with or without mammography services both in the county and in the neighboring counties.The relationship between breast cancer MIRs and access to mammography services at FQHCs differed by race and county of residence. Breast cancer MIRs were lower in counties with mammography facilities or FQHC delivery sites than in counties without a mammography facility or FQHC delivery site. This trend was stronger in urban counties (p=0.01) and among whites (p=0.008). Counties with a high density of mammography facilities had lower breast cancer MIRs than other counties, specifically in urban counties (p=0.01) and among whites (p=0.01). Breast cancer MIR for blacks was the lowest in counties having mammography facilities; and was highest in counties without a mammography facility within the county or the neighboring counties (p=0.03).Mammography services provided at FQHCs may have a positive impact on breast cancer MIRs. Expansion of services provided at the FQHCs and placement of FQHCs in additional underserved areas might help to reduce cancer disparities in the United States.

Safety net providers have faced barriers in administering patient experience surveys due to a lack of resources and survey expertise, but this problem has received little attention in the literature. In this manuscript, we offer lessons learned from the administration of a patient experience survey at a mid-size behavioral health care agency serving a safety net population. Specifically, we discuss resource needs, methods of increasing response rate among transient populations, methods for engaging stakeholders and clinical staff in quality improvement initiatives, and considerations for responding to setbacks and challenges dynamically. We also offer insight on the effective dissemination of results within safety net organizations and discuss the role of organizational culture.

This article reports on a study conducted in 2001 that examined the role of four schools of nursing (SONs) in Michigan and their challenges in serving the safety net population through primary care nurse-managed centers (NMCs). The NMCs are described and compared to community health centers (CHCs) in terms of patient mix, funding sources, and contributions SONs make as a substitute resource for federal funding to the NMCs. NMCs are frequently invisible providers in the health system, yet they serve high-need populations. Similarities and differences between NMCs and CHCs are discussed as well as the unique challenges faced by NMCs and their SONs as the result of policies that sometimes limit NMCs ability to serve safety net populations.

Use of oncology-related services is increasingly scrutinized, yet precisely which services are actually rendered to patients, particularly at the end of life, is unknown. This study characterizes the end-of-life use of medical services by patients with gynecologic cancer at a safety-net hospital.Oncologic history and metrics of medical use (eg, hospitalizations, chemotherapy infusions, procedures) for patients with gynecologic oncology who died between December 2006 and February 2012 were evaluated. Mixed-effect regression models were used to test time effects and construct usage summaries.Among 116 subjects, cervical cancer accounted for the most deaths (42%). The median age at diagnosis was 55 years; 63% were Hispanic, and 65% had advanced disease. Only 34% died in hospice care. The median times from do not resuscitate/do not intubate documentation and from last therapeutic intervention to death were 9 days and 55 days, respectively. Significant time effects for all services (eg, hospitalizations, diagnostics, procedures, treatments, clinic appointments) were detected during the patient's final year (P.001), with the most dramatic changes occurring during the last 2 months. Patients with longer duration of continuity of care used significantly fewer resources toward the end of life.To our knowledge, this is the first report enumerating medical services obtained by patients with gynecologic cancer in a large, public hospital during the end of life. Marked changes in interventions in the patient's final 2 months highlight the need for cost-effective, evidence-based metrics for delivering cancer care. Our data emphasize continuity of care as a significant determinant of oncologic resource use during this critical period.