Search

A 61-year-old male underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for decompensated chronic liver disease with hepatocellular carcinoma. The right lobe from the live donor was used as the graft. During implantation, the drainage of the anterior sector of the right lobe graft was through a reconstructed middle hepatic vein using a prosthetic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft. Routine follow-up at 6 weeks showed a thrombosed PTFE graft with no clinical, radiological, or biochemical deterioration of the allograft. He was therefore managed conservatively. A routine computed tomography scan at 2 years demonstrated that the PTFE graft had eroded into the duodenum. Given the total absence of symptoms and the risk of complications associated with removing the graft, we decided against any surgical or endoscopic intervention. After a further 3 year period of follow-up, the patient continues to remain well. Enteric erosion of a prosthetic graft following LDLT can be managed without intervention, although long-term consequences are unknown.

Background: Although minimally invasive right donor hepatectomy (RDH) has been reported, this innovation is yet to be widely accepted by transplant community. Bleeding during transection, division of right hepatic duct (RHD), suturing of donor duct as well as retrieval with minimal warm ischemia are the primary concerns of most donor surgeons. We describe our simplified technique of robotic RDH evolved over 144 cases. Patients and Methods: Right lobe mobilization is performed in a clockwise manner from right triangular ligament over inferior vena cavae up to hepatocaval ligament. Transection is initiated using a combination of bipolar diathermy and monopolar shears controlled by console surgeon working in tandem with lap CUSA operated by assistant surgeon. With the guidance of indocyanine green cholangiography, RHD is divided with robotic endowrist scissors (Potts), and remnant duct is sutured with 6-0 PDS. Final posterior liver transection is completed caudocranial without hanging manoeuvre. Right lobe with intact vascular pedicle is placed in a bag, vascular structures then divided, and retrieved through Pfannenstiel incision. Conclusion: Our technique may be easy to adapt with the available robotic instruments. Further innovation of robotic platform with liver friendly devices could make robotic RDH the standard of care in future.

From the context of organ donation, COVID-19 vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is important as there is an ethical dilemma in utilizing versus discarding organs from potential donors succumbing to VITT. This consensus statement is an attempt by the National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (NOTTO) apex technical committees, India, to formulate the guidelines for deceased organ donation and transplantation in relation to VITT to help in appropriate decision-making. VITT is a rare entity, but a meticulous approach should be taken by the organ procurement organization's (OPO) team in screening such cases. All such cases must be strictly notified to the national authorities (NOTTO) as a resource for data collection and ensuring compliance with protocols in the management of adverse events following immunization. Organs from any patient who developed thrombotic events up to 4 weeks after adenoviral vector-based vaccination should be considered to be linked to VITT and investigated appropriately. The viability of the organs must be thoroughly checked by the OPO, and the final decision in relation to organ use should be decided by the expert committee of the OPO team consisting of a virologist, a hematologist, and a treating team. Considering the organ shortage, in case of suspected/confirmed VITT, both clinicians and patients should consider the risk‒benefit equation based on limited experience. An appropriate written informed consent of potential recipients and family members should be obtained before the transplantation of organs from suspected or proven VITT donors.

Background and Aims: Liver transplantation has become an effective therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease. The risk of new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) and posttransplant metabolic syndrome (PTMS) is high among patients after liver transplantation. These are thought to be associated with increased risks of graft rejection, infection, cardiovascular disease, and death. Our study aimed to document the incidence of NODAT and PTMS and analyze pre and posttransplant predictive factors for their development in patients undergoing a liver transplant. Methods: This was a prospective comparative study on 51 patients who underwent live donor liver transplantation. They were evaluated at baseline, 3 and 6 months after transplantation with fasting glucose, lipids, serum insulin levels, C-peptide, and HbA1C. They were followed up at 5 years to document any cardiovascular events or rejection. Results: The incidence of preoperative diabetes mellitus (DM) in the study group was 25/51 (49%). The incidence of NODAT was 38.5% (10/26 patients) and PTMS 29% (10/35), respectively. Age (47.7 ± 5.4 vs 41.5 ± 12.7 years), HOMA2 -IR (2.3 ± 1.8 vs 2.1 ± 1.6), serum insulin (16.1 ± 12.0 vs 17.9 ± 14.5), and C-peptide (4.6 ± 0.5 vs 4.8 ± 0.7) were similar at baseline in the NODAT group compared to those who did not develop it. Mean tacrolimus levels were higher in PTMS group (6.8 ± 2.9 vs 5.0. ± 2.0 P value = 0.042). By the end of 5 years, 7 patients expired; 6 due to rejection and one due to cardiovascular disease. Moreover, 2 of these patients had preexisting DM and 2 had NODAT. Conclusions: None of the baseline metabolic factors in patients undergoing liver transplant were predictive of the development of NODAT or PTMS. Mean tacrolimus levels were significantly higher in the PTMS group. A 5-year follow-up showed no excess risk of cardiovascular events or rejection in those with preexisting DM or in those who developed NODAT.

In December 2019 Novel corona virus (SARS-CoV-2) infection started in Wuhan and resulted in a pandemic within few weeks' time. Organ transplant recipients being at a risk for more severe COVID-19 if they get SARS CoV-2 viral infection, COVID 19 Vaccine has a significant role in these patients. The vaccine is a safer way to help build protection and would either prevent COVID -19 infection or atleast diminish the severity of the disease. It would also reduce the risk of the continuing transmission and enhance herd immunity. Immuno compromised patients should not receive live vaccines as they can cause vaccine related disease and hence the guidelines suggest that all transplant recipients should receive age appropriate 'inactivated vaccine' as recommended for general population. Though trials have not been undertaken on transplant recipients, efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccine have been scientifically documented for few vaccines among the general population.

Objective: To highlight two cases mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine tumors (MINEN) of the liver and to review the literature till date. To present two cases of MINEN of the liver diagnosed in our centre with clinical & diagnostic workup, the treatment modalities, and follow up. Extensive review of the literature and compilation of the presentation and treatment modalities used in those cases., Case Reports: Thirty-three cases of MINEN of the liver have been reported till date including ours. Our cases presented as incidental masses in liver during workup for other symptoms. AFP levels were normal in both cases but PIVKA (Protein induced by vitamin K absence) levels were increased. Resection was done in one of the cases while the other patient had to undergo transplantation. A diagnosis of MINEN was made on H&E, and confirmed on IHC. One patient was unfit for systemic chemotherapy whereas the other patient received cisplastin and etoposide based chemotherapy. Both patients developed metastasis on follow up but are still alive after 12-15 months., Conclusion: MINEN is an uncommon tumor of the liver with a poor prognosis as shown by the few studies available. Recurrence and distant metastases are often described even after complete resection and the course is fatal. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy following surgical resection is not fully elucidated. Mean survival in the cases reported ranged from 1 month to 33 months. However, no significant differences were seen in the clinicopathologic profile of the cases described so far. Further multiinstitutional studies and follow up will help to further characterize this subtype for appropriate treatment.

Background: Prostaglandins are naturally occurring lipids that are synthesised from arachidonic acid. Multiple studies have evaluated the benefits of prostaglandins in reducing ischaemia reperfusion injury after liver transplantation. New studies have been published since the previous review, and hence it was important to update the evidence for this intervention., Objectives: To evaluate the benefits and harms of prostaglandins in adults undergoing liver transplantation compared with placebo or standard care., Search Methods: We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 27 December 2022., Selection Criteria: We included randomised clinical trials evaluating prostaglandins initiated in the perioperative period compared with placebo or standard care for adults undergoing liver transplantation. We included trials irrespective of reported outcomes., Data Collection and Analysis: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. all-cause mortality, 2. serious adverse events, and 3. health-related quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were 4. liver retransplantation, 5. early allograft dysfunction, 6. primary non-function of the allograft, 7. acute kidney failure, 8. length of hospital stay, and 9. adverse events considered non-serious. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence., Main Results: We included 11 randomised clinical trials with 771 adult liver transplant recipients (mean age 47.31 years, male 61.48%), of whom 378 people were randomised to receive prostaglandins and 393 people were randomised to either placebo (272 participants) or standard care (121 participants). All trials were published between 1993 and 2016. Ten trials were conducted in high- and upper-middle-income countries. Prostaglandins may reduce all-cause mortality up to one month (risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61 to 1.23; risk difference (RD) 21 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 63 fewer to 36 more; 11 trials, 771 participants; low-certainty evidence). Prostaglandins may result in little to no difference in serious adverse events (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.40; RD 81 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 148 fewer to 18 more; 6 trials, 568 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the included trials reported health-related quality of life. Prostaglandins may result in little to no difference in liver retransplantation (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.96; RD 1 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 33 fewer to 62 more; 6 trials, 468 participants; low-certainty evidence); early allograft dysfunction (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.18; RD 137 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 241 fewer to 47 more; 1 trial, 99 participants; low-certainty evidence); primary non-function of the allograft (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.32; RD 23 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 40 fewer to 16 more; 7 trials, 624 participants; low-certainty evidence); and length of hospital stay (mean difference (MD) -1.15 days, 95% CI -5.44 to 3.14; 4 trials, 369 participants; low-certainty evidence). Prostaglandins may result in a large reduction in the development of acute kidney failure requiring dialysis (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.73; RD 100 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 132 fewer to 49 fewer; 5 trials, 477 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of prostaglandins on adverse events considered non-serious (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.42 to 3.36; RD 225 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 294 fewer to 65 fewer; 4 trials, 329 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Two trials reported receiving funding; one of these was with vested interests. We found one registered ongoing trial., Authors' Conclusions: Eleven trials evaluated prostaglandins in adult liver transplanted recipients. Based on low-certainty evidence, prostaglandins may reduce all-cause mortality up to one month; may cause little to no difference in serious adverse events, liver retransplantation, early allograft dysfunction, primary non-function of the allograft, and length of hospital stay; and may have a large reduction in the development of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis. We do not know the effect of prostaglandins on adverse events considered non-serious. We lack adequately powered, high-quality trials evaluating the effects of prostaglandins for people undergoing liver transplantation., (Copyright © 2023 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Objectives: Our study aimed to evaluate the real-world data on renal and neurological adverse effects and effectiveness of colistimethate sodium (CMS) and polymyxin B (PMB)., Materials and Methods: An observational prospective study was performed on inpatients receiving CMS and PMB for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. CMS dose was titrated to renal function, and serum creatinine was assessed daily. The incidence of nephrotoxicity, the primary outcome, was evaluated based on an increase in serum creatinine from baseline as well as by the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage renal disease criteria. Neurological adverse effects were assessed based on clinical signs and symptoms, and the causality and severity were assessed by the Naranjo scale and modified Hartwig-Siegel scale, respectively. The effectiveness of polymyxin therapy was ascertained by a composite of microbiological eradication of causative bacteria and achievement of clinical cure. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was also determined., Results: Between CMS and PMB, the incidence of nephrotoxicity (59.3% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.653) or neurotoxicity (8.3% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.525) did not significantly differ. However, reversal of nephrotoxicity was significantly more with patients receiving CMS than PMB (48.4% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.021). Favorable clinical outcomes (67.6% vs. 37%, P < 0.001) and microbiological eradication of causative bacteria (73.1% vs. 46.3%, P = 0.001) were significantly more with CMS than PMB. Patients treated with CMS had lower all-cause mortality than those with PMB treatment (19.4% vs. 42.6%, P = 0.002)., Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the incidence of renal and neurotoxic adverse effects between CMS and PMB when CMS is administered following renal dose modification. CMS shows better effectiveness and lower mortality compared to PMB., Competing Interests: None

From the context of organ donation, COVID-19 vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is important as there is an ethical dilemma in utilizing versus discarding organs from potential donors succumbing to VITT. This consensus statement is an attempt by the National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (NOTTO) apex technical committees India to formulate the guidelines for deceased organ donation and transplantation in relation to VITT to help in appropriate decision making. VITT is a rare entity, but a meticulous approach should be taken by the Organ Procurement Organization's (OPO) team in screening such cases. All such cases must be strictly notified to the national authorities like NOTTO, as a resource for data collection and ensuring compliance withprotocols in the management of adverse events following immunization. Organs from any patient who developed thrombotic events up to 4 weeks after adenoviral vector-based vaccination should be linked to VITT and investigated appropriately. The viability of the organs must be thoroughly checked by the OPO, and the final decision in relation to organ use should be decided by the expert committee of the OPO team consisting of a virologist, a hematologist, and atreating team. Considering the organ shortage, in case of suspected/confirmed VITT, both clinicians and patients should consider the risk-benefit equationbased on available experience, and an appropriate written informed consent of potential recipients and family members should be obtained before transplantation of organs from suspected or proven VITT donors., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Nephrology.)