Search

Introduction: Risankizumab has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to other psoriasis treatments, including secukinumab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab; switching to risankizumab from other psoriasis treatments has shown superior clinical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of directly switching patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and a suboptimal response to interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (secukinumab or ixekizumab) to risankizumab., Methods: This 52-week, phase 3b study enrolled patients (≥ 18 years) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who had previously been treated with the recommended dose of secukinumab or ixekizumab for ≥ 6 months but did not achieve an optimal response (static Physician's Global Assessment [sPGA] 2/3; body surface are [BSA] 3- < 10%). Patients received subcutaneous risankizumab (150 mg) without washout. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving sPGA of 0/1 at week 16. Secondary endpoints included sPGA 0/1 at week 52, sPGA 0, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1, and Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) 0 at weeks 16 and 52. Safety was monitored throughout the study., Results: The study included 244 patients. sPGA 0/1 was achieved by 57.4% and 62.3% at week 16 and 52. At week 16, sPGA 0, DLQI 0/1, and PSS 0 were achieved by 20.5%, 40.2%, and 20.9%, respectively. At week 52, these proportions increased to 27.1% for sPGA 0, 47.2% for DLQI 0/1, and 27.5% for PSS 0. Most frequently reported adverse events (reported in ≥ 5% of patients) in risankizumab-treated patients were COVID-19 infection (8.6%) and nasopharyngitis (5.7%). No new safety signals were observed., Conclusions: Directly switching to risankizumab improved outcomes and QoL in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had suboptimal responses to anti-IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab or ixekizumab). The safety results are consistent with previously reported safety of risankizumab. This study supports the efficacy of risankizumab in patients previously treated with biologics, including IL-17 inhibitors, and suggests a direct switch to risankizumab for improved clinical outcomes and QoL., Clinical Trials: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04102007., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Psoriasis is a common, life-long skin disease with a significant negative health and societal impact. Data on rates of disease control and treatment strategies are lacking in Central and Eastern European countries. We aimed to describe the real-world disease severity, control, and treatment strategies for psoriasis in patients from Central and Eastern European countries. CRYSTAL (EUPAS36459) was a cross-sectional, retrospective study in adults (18-75 years) from Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, and Russia. We enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving continuous systemic treatment for ≥24 weeks. We used the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) to describe disease severity and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) to assess quality of life (QoL) and collected other outcomes [psoriasis work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI-PSO), patient satisfaction] at enrollment. Analyses were descriptive. A total of 690 patients were included in the analyses. Median disease duration was 11.8 years. Current treatment was monotherapy for most patients (95.8%) with either biological (BIO group; 88.4%) or conventional (NON-BIO group; 7.4%) agents. Mean (± standard deviation) absolute PASI scores were 3.5 ± 5.7, 3.1 ± 5.3, and 6.6 ± 7.4 in the overall population, the BIO group, and the NON-BIO group, respectively. Among patients treated with monotherapy, absolute PASI scores ≤1, ≤3, and ≤5 were observed for 44.1%, 72.0%, and 82.6% of BIO patients and 21.6%, 33.3%, and 49.0% of NON-BIO patients. Mean DLQI total score was 3.3 ± 5.1; higher scores were noted for higher absolute PASI. The most impacted WPAI-PSO domain was presenteeism; for all domains, impact increased with increased absolute PASI. A total of 91.8% of BIO patients and 74.5% of NON-BIO patients were satisfied with the current treatment. We observed a better disease control in BIO than NON-BIO patients. However, around half of BIO patients did not reach clear skin status and reported an impact on QoL. An improvement in treatment strategies is still needed in Central and Eastern European countries to optimize outcomes of moderate-to-severe psoriasis., Competing Interests: LR reports honoraria for lectures and support for attending meetings from AbbVie. IH reports grants or contracts from Abbvie and Galderma; consulting fees from AbbVie and Janssen; honoraria for lectures and presentations at educational events from AbbVie, Janssen, and Novartis; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from AbbVie and Janssen. SV reports Investigator agreement and payment from AbbVie. AK reports honoraria for lectures and/or Investigator agreements from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Regeneron, Janssen, and Leo Pharma. IB reports personal and institution payments from AbbVie. DM, SR, and TA are full-time employees of Abbvie and may hold AbbVie stock and/or stock options. MC reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Novartis Pharma, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer; honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, Novartis Pharma, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, UCB, Sun Pharma, Genesis Pharma, and Amring; payment for expert testimony from UCB and Amring; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Terapia and for participation on Data Safety Monitoring or Advisory Board from UCB, Amring, and Novartis Pharma. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declare that this study received funding from AbbVie. The funder contributed to the design, participated in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, and in writing, reviewing, and approval of the final version., (Copyright © 2024 Raam, Hartmane, Valiukevičienė, Karamova, Telegdy, Botev, Marina, Rubant, Albuquerque and Constantin.)

Introduction: Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who experience poor clinical outcomes, including patients with obesity or prior treatment, need improved treatment options. Risankizumab specifically inhibits interleukin 23 and has demonstrated superior efficacy in active-comparator studies in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. We compared the efficacy of risankizumab with that of secukinumab across patient subgroups., Methods: Subgroup analyses using data from the phase 3 IMMerge study (NCT03478787) were performed. Efficacy in adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with risankizumab 150 mg and secukinumab 300 mg was assessed as the proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI 90) at week 52 across demographics and disease characteristics. Post hoc analyses evaluated the proportion of patients who achieved PASI 90 and the least-squares mean percent PASI improvement from baseline at week 52 by body weight and body mass index (BMI), PASI 90 by prior treatment, and clinical response [PASI 90, PASI 100, and/or static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of clear (0) or almost clear (1)] at week 16 and maintained particular response at week 52. Logistic regression analyses examined the effect of covariates (age, sex, BMI, baseline PASI, treatment) and potential interactions on PASI 90 at week 52., Results: More patients who received risankizumab (n = 164) compared with secukinumab (n = 163) achieved PASI 90 at week 52, regardless of demographics and disease characteristics (BMI, prior treatment, disease duration, and maintenance of clinical response at week 52). Improvements in PASI were greater in patients taking risankizumab than those taking secukinumab, regardless of weight or BMI. Results from logistic regression analysis showed treatment type had a significant impact on PASI 90 (risankizumab versus secukinumab, p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Risankizumab showed consistently greater efficacy compared with secukinumab across different patient subgroups, and this was maintained through 52 weeks., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NCT03478787., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The protective epithelial barrier in our skin undergoes constant regulation, whereby the balance between differentiation and proliferation of keratinocytes plays a major role. Impaired keratinocyte differentiation and proliferation are key elements in the pathophysiology of several important dermatological diseases, including atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Ca(2+) influx plays an essential role in this process presumably mediated by different transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. However, investigating their individual role was hampered by the lack of specific stimulators or inhibitors. Because we have recently identified hyperforin as a specific TRPC6 activator, we investigated the contribution of TRPC6 to keratinocyte differentiation and proliferation. Like the endogenous differentiation stimulus high extracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](o)), hyperforin triggers differentiation in HaCaT cells and in primary cultures of human keratinocytes by inducing Ca(2+) influx via TRPC6 channels and additional inhibition of proliferation. Knocking down TRPC6 channels prevents the induction of Ca(2+)- and hyperforin-induced differentiation. Importantly, TRPC6 activation is sufficient to induce keratinocyte differentiation similar to the physiological stimulus [Ca(2+)](o). Therefore, TRPC6 activation by hyperforin may represent a new innovative therapeutic strategy in skin disorders characterized by altered keratinocyte differentiation.