Search

Aims Although concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are frequently present in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), outcome data are scarce and treatment strategies are controversial. The aim of the present study was to assess the presentation and outcome of patients with AS and coexisting MR and TR. Methods and results Eighty-nine consecutive patients with severe AS and at least moderate MR (72 functional and 17 degenerative) were included and followed. Seventy-five patients were symptomatic at presentation. Sixty of these had severe symptoms (New York Heart Association class ≥3). Nine additional patients had an indication for valve procedures during follow-up. However, 35 patients were managed conservatively. Isolated aortic valve intervention was performed in 29 patients (22 valve replacement and 7 transcatheter aortic valve replacement) and concomitant mitral valve surgery in 20 patients. For the assessment of outcome, overall survival (i.e. time from study entry to death from any cause) was assessed: adjusted survival was significantly higher for patients undergoing any valve procedure as compared with patients managed conservatively (P = 0.032). Surgical treatment of severe concomitant MR was associated with improved survival in an unadjusted population but did not reach statistical significance after propensity adjustment. 14 of 36 patients who had concomittant moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) underwent surgery of which 7 (50 %) died within 3 months postoperatively. On the other hand, only 1 of 35 (3%) with no or mild TR undergoing surgery died within 3 months post-operatively (P

Objectives This study sought to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with and without peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the BRAVO‐3 trial with respect to the effect of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH). Background PAD is found frequently in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and is reported to confer an increased risk of adverse events. It is unknown whether patients with and without PAD may demonstrate a differential response to bivalirudin versus UFH. Methods BRAVO‐3 was a randomized multicenter trial comparing transfemoral TAVR with bivalirudin versus UFH (31 centers, n = 802). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were a composite of 30‐day death, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). Net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE) were a composite of major bleeding or MACE. Results The total cohort included 119 patients with PAD. Vascular complications occurred significantly more frequently in patients with PAD both in‐hospital (25.2 vs. 16.7%; OR 1.68) and at 30 days (29.4 vs. 17.3%; OR 1.99). No significant differences were observed regarding mortality, NACE, MACE, major bleeding or CVA with bivalirudin versus UFH among patients with or without PAD. In patients with PAD, bivalirudin was associated with an increased risk of minor vascular complications at 30 days. Conclusions Patients with PAD undergoing transfemoral TAVR did not exhibit an increased risk of any major adverse events, according to the procedural anticoagulant randomization. However, patients treated with Bivalirudin had significantly higher rates of minor vascular complications.

OBJECTIVES Surgical repair is considered the gold standard treatment for severe symptomatic tricuspid valve (TV) regurgitation. However, patients undergoing isolated surgical tricuspid repair face a high perioperative mortality while long-term data on interventional treatment options are currently missing. We investigated a novel, minimally invasive approach for transatrial off-pump beating-heart tricuspid annular plication based on the surgical Hetzer repair. METHODS TV annular plication for the creation of a double-orifice valve using novel devices for automated annular suturing was performed in 10 human heart specimens in an ex vivo perfusion model under endoscopic guidance. Additionally, the technique was tested in an in vivo porcine model using the transatrial access under echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance. RESULTS Endoscopically guided conduction of the procedure was successful in all 10 human heart specimens in the ex vivo perfusion model with 1 observed suture pull-through of 60 sutures placed (1.7%). TV measurements yielded significant reductions of the TV septal–lateral diameter (50.9 ± 7.3 vs 42.6 ± 7.9 mm; P = 0.015) and the TV area (1208 ± 399 vs 193 ± 122 mm2; P CONCLUSIONS Successful plication was completed in 10 ex vivo human hearts, additionally proof-of-concept was conducted in 2 animals. We herein present encouraging early preclinical results of a novel minimally invasive technique for TV repair, which warrants further investigation.

Aims We sought to assess the efficacy of a heart valve clinic (HVC) follow-up programme for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Methods and results Three hundred and eighty-eight consecutive patients with AS (age 71 ± 10 years; aortic-jet velocity 5.1 ± 0.6 m/s) and an indication for aortic valve replacement (AVR) were included. Of these, 290 patients presented with an indication for surgery at their first visit at the HVC and 98 asymptomatic patients who had been enrolled in an HVC monitoring programme developed indications for surgery during follow-up. Time to symptom detection was significantly longer in patients that presented with symptoms at baseline (352 ± 471 days) than in patients followed in the HVC (76 ± 75 days, P < 0.001). Despite being educated to recognize and promptly report new symptoms, 77 of the 98 patients in the HVC programme waited until the next scheduled consultation to report them. Severe symptom onset (NYHA or CCS Class ≥III) was present in 61% of patients being symptomatic at the initial visit and in 34% of patients in the HVC programme ( P < 0.001). Conclusion Delays in referral and symptom reporting as well as symptom denial are common in patients with AS. These findings support the concept of risk stratification to identify patients who may benefit from elective surgery. A structured HVC programme results in the detection of symptoms at an earlier and less severe stage and thus in an optimized timing of surgery.

Long and mid-term data in Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis (LFLG-AS) are scarce. The present study sought to identify predictors of outcome in a sizeable cohort of patients with LFLG-AS. 76 consecutive patients with LFLG-AS (defined by a mean gradient 2 and an ejection fraction ≤50%) were prospectively enrolled and followed at regular intervals. Events defined as aortic valve replacement (AVR) and death were assessed and overall survival was determined. 44 patients underwent AVR (10 transcatheter and 34 surgical) whilst intervention was not performed in 32 patients, including 9 patients that died during a median waiting time of 4 months. Survival was significantly better after AVR with survival rates of 91.8% (CI 71.1–97.9%), 83.0% (CI 60.7–93.3%) and 56.3% (CI 32.1–74.8%) at 1,2 and 5 years as compared to 84.3% (CI 66.2–93.1%), 52.9% (CI 33.7–69.0%) and 30.3% (CI 14.6–47.5%), respectively, for patients managed conservatively (p = 0.017). The presence of right ventricular dysfunction (HR 3.47 [1.70–7.09]) and significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (HR 2.23 [1.13–4.39]) independently predicted overall mortality while the presence of significant TR (HR 3.40[1.38–8.35]) and higher aortic jet velocity (HR 0.91[0.82–1.00]) were independent predictors of mortality and survival after AVR. AVR is associated with improved long-term survival in patients with LFLG-AS. Treatment delays are associated with excessive mortality, warranting urgent treatment in eligible patients. Right ventricular involvement characterized by the presence of TR and/or right ventricular dysfunction, identifies patients at high risk of mortality under both conservative management and after AVR.

International audience; Importance - The natural history and the management of patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) have not been fully examined in the current era. Objective - To determine the clinical outcomes of patients with asymptomatic AS using data from the Heart Valve Clinic International Database. Design, setting, and participants - This registry was assembled by merging data from prospectively gathered institutional databases from 10 heart valve clinics in Europe, Canada, and the United States. Asymptomatic patients with an aortic valve area of 1.5 cm2 or less and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than 50% at entry were considered for the present analysis. Data were collected from January 2001 to December 2014, and data were analyzed from January 2017 to July 2018. Main outcomes and measures - Natural history, need for aortic valve replacement (AVR), and survival of asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe AS at entry followed up in a heart valve clinic. Indications for AVR were based on current guideline recommendations. Results - Of the 1375 patients included in this analysis, 834 (60.7%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 71 (13) years. A total of 861 patients (62.6%) had severe AS (aortic valve area less than 1.0 cm2). The mean (SD) overall survival during medical management (mean [SD] follow up, 27 [24] months) was 93% (1%), 86% (2%), and 75% (4%) at 2, 4, and 8 years, respectively. A total of 104 patients (7.6%) died under observation, including 57 patients (54.8%) from cardiovascular causes. The crude rate of sudden death was 0.65% over the duration of the study. A total of 542 patients (39.4%) underwent AVR, including 388 patients (71.6%) with severe AS at study entry and 154 (28.4%) with moderate AS at entry who progressed to severe AS. Those with severe AS at entry who underwent AVR did so at a mean (SD) of 14.4 (16.6) months and a median of 8.7 months. The mean (SD) 2-year and 4-year AVR-free survival rates for asymptomatic patients with severe AS at baseline were 54% (2%) and 32% (3%), respectively. In those undergoing AVR, the 30-day postprocedural mortality was 0.9%. In patients with severe AS at entry, peak aortic jet velocity (greater than 5 m/s) and LVEF (less than 60%) were associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality without AVR; these factors were also associated with postprocedural mortality in those patients with severe AS at baseline who underwent AVR (surgical AVR in 310 patients; transcatheter AVR in 78 patients). Conclusions and relevance - In patients with asymptomatic AS followed up in heart valve centers, the risk of sudden death is low, and rates of overall survival are similar to those reported from previous series. Patients with severe AS at baseline and peak aortic jet velocity of 5.0 m/s or greater or LVEF less than 60% have increased risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality even after AVR. The potential benefit of early intervention should be considered in these high-risk patients.

Objectives This study sought to assess the long-term outcome of active surveillance in these patients. Background The optimal timing of mitral valve surgery in asymptomatic primary mitral regurgitation (MR) remains controversial. Methods Between 1997 and 2015, 280 consecutive patients with severe asymptomatic primary MR were enrolled in our heart valve clinic follow-up program. They were prospectively followed up every 6 months clinical and echocardiographical examinations until surgical criteria were reached. Event-free survival and overall survival as compared with the age- and gender-matched general population were assessed. Results During a median potential follow-up of 93.4 (quartiles 55.3 to 152.9) months, 161 patients developed an indication for surgery and 13 patients died. Event-free survival rates were 78.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.2% to 83.2%) at 2 years, 52.2% (95% CI: 46.3% to 59.0%) at 6 years, 35.5% (95% CI: 29.3% to 43.1%) at 10 years, and 18.7% (95% CI: 12.3% to 28.5%) at 15 years. Overall survival rate was 99.6% (95% CI: 98.9% to 100%) at 2 years, 94.6% (95% CI: 91.7% to 97.6%) at 6 years, 85.6% (95% CI: 80.3% to 91.2%) at 10 years, and 74.5% (95% CI: 66.6% to 83.4%) at 15 years. Overall survival of patients managed according to an active surveillance strategy was comparable with the expected cumulative survival and early survival rates were even better in the study population (standardized mortality ratio: 0.667; 95% CI: 0.463 to 0.963; p = 0.013). Conclusions Patients with severe asymptomatic primary MR may remain free of indications for surgery for extensive periods of time. In such patients, active surveillance performed in experienced centers is associated with a favorable prognosis, resulting in timely referral to surgery, excellent long-term survival, and good surgical outcomes.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is common in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and has been related to higher risk for adverse events. Whether patients with and without PAD experience different outcomes according to bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin (UFH) use

Objectives This study sought to describe the natural history of combined stenotic and regurgitant aortic valve disease. Background Data on outcome and prognostic factors in combined aortic valve disease are scarce. Methods This study prospectively followed 71 consecutive asymptomatic patients (21 women, age 52 ± 17 years) with at least moderate aortic stenosis in combination with at least moderate aortic regurgitation and preserved left ventricular function (ejection fraction ≥55%). Results During a median potential follow-up of 8.9 years, 50 patients developed an indication for aortic valve replacement and no cardiac deaths were observed. Overall event rates were high with an event-free survival for the entire patient population of 82 ± 5%, 62 ± 6%, 49 ± 6%, 33 ± 6%, and 19 ± 5% at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 years, respectively. There was 1 operative and no post-operative deaths. Peak aortic jet velocity (AV-Vel) independently predicted event-free survival. Patients with an AV-Vel between 3 and 3.9 m/s had an event-free survival of 94 ± 4%, 88 ± 6%, 65 ± 9%, and 51 ± 9% after 1, 2, 4, and 6 years, respectively, compared with 92 ± 4%, 67 ± 7%, 38 ± 8%, and 12 ± 6% for patients with an AV-Vel between 4 and 4.9 m/s and 67 ± 8%, 39 ± 10%, 17 ± 9%, and 0% for patients with an AV-Vel ≥5 m/s (p Conclusions Asymptomatic patients with combined aortic valve disease can be safely followed until surgical criteria defined for aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, or the aorta are reached. However, high event rates can be expected even in younger patients and those with only moderate disease. AV-Vel, which reflects both stenosis and regurgitant severity, provides an objective and easily assessable predictive parameter.

This study sought to assess the natural history and optimal timing of surgery in elderly patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS).AS is increasingly diagnosed in an aging population, and large numbers of elderly patients are undergoing aortic valve procedures. However, the average age of patients represented in most natural history studies on AS is between 60 and 70 years.A total of 103 consecutive patients70 years of age (51 female; mean age 77 ± 5 years) with asymptomatic severe AS (peak aortic jet velocity [AV-Vel] 4.7 ± 0.6 m/s) were prospectively followed.During follow-up, 91 events occurred, including an indication for aortic valve replacement in 82 patients and cardiac deaths in 9, respectively. Event-free survival was 73%, 43%, 23%, and 16% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Physical mobility was impaired in 29% of the patients, and symptom onset was severe (New York Heart Association functional class ≥III) in 43% of those who developed symptoms. Patients with AV-Vel ≥5.0 m/s had event-free survival rates of 21% and 6% at 2 and 4 years, respectively, compared with 57% and 23% for patients with AV-Vel 5.0 m/s (p 0.001). Seventy-one patients underwent aortic valve replacement, and post-operative survival was 89% and 77% after 1 and 3 years, respectively.In elderly patients with severe but asymptomatic AS, mild symptoms may be difficult to detect, particularly when mobility is impaired and severe symptom onset is common, warranting close clinical follow-up. Furthermore, a very high event rate can be expected, and cardiac deaths are not infrequent. Thus, elective aortic valve procedures may be considered in selected elderly patients at low procedural risk.

We sought to assess outcomes and risk stratification tools in a large population of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. 178 consecutive patients (71 female, age 48 ± 16 yrs; 109 with outflow tract obstruction) with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were included and followed. Outcome was assessed

Background— We sought to assess the outcome of asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis. Methods and Results— We prospectively followed 116 consecutive asymptomatic patients (57 women; age, 67±16 years) with very severe isolated aortic stenosis defined by a peak aortic jet velocity (AV-Vel) ≥5.0 m/s (average AV-Vel, 5.37±0.35 m/s; valve area, 0.63±0.12 cm 2 ). During a median follow-up of 41 months (interquartile range, 26 to 63 months), 96 events occurred (indication for aortic valve replacement, 90; cardiac deaths, 6). Event-free survival was 64%, 36%, 25%, 12%, and 3% at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 years, respectively. AV-Vel but not aortic valve area was shown to independently affect event-free survival. Patients with an AV-Vel ≥5.5 m/s had an event-free survival of 44%, 25%, 11%, and 4% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively, compared with 76%, 43%, 33%, and 17% for patients with an AV-Vel between 5.0 and 5.5 m/s ( P II) than those with an AV-Vel between 5.0 and 5.5 m/s (27%; P =0.03). Conclusions— Despite being asymptomatic, patients with very severe aortic stenosis have a poor prognosis with a high event rate and a risk of rapid functional deterioration. Early elective valve replacement surgery should therefore be considered in these patients.