Search

As the use of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) becomes more widespread, dressing designs have evolved to address implementation challenges and meet surgeon demand. While traditional application of ciNPT was limited to the immediate suture line, a novel dressing that covers the incision and additional surrounding tissues has become available. To expand upon previous ciNPT recommendations and provide guidance on this new dressing, an expert panel of plastic surgeons convened to review the current literature, identify challenges to the implementation and sustainability of ciNPT, and use a modified Delphi technique to form a consensus on the appropriate use of ciNPT with full-coverage dressings. After three rounds of collecting expert opinion via the Delphi method, consensus was reached if 80% of the panel agreed upon a statement. This manuscript establishes 10 consensus statements regarding when ciNPT with full-coverage foam dressings should be considered or recommended in the presence of patient or incision risk factors, effective therapeutic settings and duration, precautions for use, and tools and techniques to support application. The panel also discussed areas of interest for future study of ciNPT with full-coverage dressings. High-quality, controlled studies are needed to expand the understanding of the benefits of ciNPT over the incision and surrounding tissues.

Dermal lymphatic malformations are rare congenital hamartomas of superficial lymphatics characterized by high recurrence rates after excision. The standard therapy for a single lesion is surgical excision with wide margins, which reduces recurrence but can have a potentially unacceptable aesthetic outcome. A case of a 24-year-old woman with a 6 cm × 5 cm dermal lymphatic malformation on her right thigh, diagnosed by clinical history, physical examination, magnetic resonance imaging and pathological findings, is reported. The patient underwent wide local excision with split-thickness skin grafting. After pathological examination revealed negative margins, the patient underwent tissue expander placement and excision of the skin graft with primary closure. The lesion did not recur, and the patient achieved a satisfactory aesthetic result. The present case represents the first report of the use of tissue expanders to treat dermal lymphatic malformations in the lower extremity and demonstrates a safe, staged approach to successful treatment.

Background: In the United States, the inferior pedicle Wise pattern technique of reduction mammaplasty has been well established as a safe and reliable method of reducing breast size while maintaining nipple-areolar vascularity and sensation. Nonetheless, the typical inverted-T scar of the Wise pattern reduction is a consistent source of patient and surgeon dissatisfaction with the operation, which has led to the increased popularity of limited-incision techniques of breast reduction. Objective: In this study, it was our goal to evaluate patient preferences for breast reduction scar location. Methods: A retrospective chart review was undertaken that identified 121 patients who underwent bilateral Wise pattern reduction mammaplasty between July 1999 and June 2004. The patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with the surgery on a 1 to 10 scale and to rate the extent, if any, to which they were bothered by their scars. Those patients who were bothered by their scars were asked to delineate which part of the scar bothered them most—the horizontal component, the vertical component, or the areolar component. A statistical analysis of the results was performed with a standard two-tailed t test and a χ2 analysis. Results: Of the 121 surveys mailed out, 27 surveys were undeliverable. Fifty-seven of the remaining 94 surveys were returned, for a response rate of 61%. Although 49 of the respondents (86%) were highly satisfied with their surgery, 37 patients (65%) indicated dissatisfaction with their scars. Forty-one patients (72%) responded to the question asking which of the scars was most bothersome. Of these 41 respondents, 10 were bothered by all scars equally. Among the remaining 31 patients, 20 (65%) indicated that the horizontal component bothered them most—a statistically significant proportion ( P < .001). Twenty-three of 46 patients (50%) who responded to the questions asking which scar they would erase if they were able to do so indicated that they would erase the vertical scar, which was also statistically significant ( P < .001). Conclusions: Our survey confirms the widespread satisfaction reported by patients who have undergone Wise pattern breast reduction surgery. However, it also demonstrates that a statistically significant number of patients are bothered by their scars. These results underscore the importance of developing techniques that minimize breast reduction scars and suggest that short-scar options would be welcomed by women considering breast reduction surgery.