Search

Background: This study aims to investigate the effects of carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) pod extract (CPE) on the viability of human endometrial mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (EnMSCs) and its impact on mRNA and protein expressions of DNA methyltransferases (DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B), histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in endometriotic patients. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, EnMSCs were derived from endometrium of patients with ovarian endometrioma (OMA-EnMSCs group) and deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE) samples of 10 endometriosis-associated infertility (EAI) women (E-EnMSCs group) and compared to EnMSCs derived from the endometrium of an endometriosis-free, normal woman as the control group (C-EnMSCs). The metabolic activity of the control and case groups were evaluated by treating them with different concentrations of CPE. Cell viability was analysed by MTT. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blot were used to evaluate the expression of specific genes at the mRNA and protein levels, respectively. Results: Treatment with 0.8 and 2 μg/mL of CPE downregulated COX-2 and HDAC1 in the E-EnMSC group compared to the C-EnMSCs group. Treatment with 0.8 μg/mL of CPE also decreased MMP2 and DNMT3B gene expressions. The COX-2 and DNMT3A genes were significantly upregulated after treatment with 2 μg/mL of CPE. Expressions of the COX-2, HDAC1, DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B peptides decreased in the all three groups after treatment with 0.8 and 2 μg/mL of CPE. Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) analysis of CPE identified 14 bioactive compounds. Molecular docking showed the best position of each bioactive compound on the different target proteins that are involved in the process of apoptosis in EnMSCs. Conclusion: In vitro and in silico analyses of CPE bioactive compounds show that they may downregulate the cell inflammatory pathway involved in the pathophysiology of endometriosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Infertility adversely affects quality of life (QoL). The present study aims to evaluate QoL and its associated factors among infertile couples. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the Fertility QoL (FertiQoL) instrument was used to measure QoL among 501 volunteer couples who attended the Infertility Clinic at the Mother and Child Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. We used an additional questionnaire to assess participants' demographic and clinical characteristics. The relationship between the scores of QoL to the sociodemographic and treatment data was analysed. Results: The subjects with lower income levels had lower relational, mind/body, emotional, and total core scores. Female participants without academic education had lower scores in the emotional subscale, while the male participants showed lower scores in emotional, mind/body, relational, social, and total QoL domains. Subjects who had undergone any type of treatment, including pharmacological treatment, intrauterine insemination (IUI), intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and in vitro fertilization (IVF) showed significantly lower scores in the environmental domain. Participants with lower infertility duration obtained significantly greater QoL scores. Finally, tolerability, emotional, and environmental domains were significantly more desirable when the infertility problem was related to a male factor. Conclusion: Infertile couples with shorter duration of infertility and male etiology have higher QoL. Lower academic education, lower income levels, or prior unsuccessful treatments are associated with lower QoL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article which was published in Int J Fertil Steril, Vol 11, No 4, Jan-Mar 2018, on pages 293-297, the "Duration of tducation (male)" was misspelled in Table 1. The corrected one is "Duration of education (male)". In the sentence "These differences might be related to the use of a fertility-specific instrument (FertiQoL) in the study by Huppelschoten et al. (23) and the current study compared to the general QoL assessment instrument by Chachamovich et al. (24) and Rashidi et al. (15)." Which was at the page of 296 in the discussion section, the word "generic" was corrected in to "general"., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright© by Royan Institute. All rights reserved.)