Search

Bruce Crawford,1 Elizabeth Piault,2 Walter Gotlieb,3 Florence Joulain41Mapi Values, Tokyo, Japan; 2Mapi Values, Boston, MA, USA; 3McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 4Sanofi, Paris, FranceBackground: The Ascites Impact Measure (AIM) was developed to record patients' daily experiences of symptoms that trigger a request for a paracentesis.Methods: Development of the AIM followed a rigorous step-wise approach, including a review of the literature, expert opinions, and qualitative research involving patients who experience symptomatic malignant ascites. The AIM's measurement properties were assessed using data from two international trials, including 59 ovarian cancer patients with symptomatic malignant ascites.Results: Following the literature review and expert discussions to develop the conceptual model, ten patients with symptomatic malignant ascites were interviewed in the item elicitation phase, resulting in a draft questionnaire with four questions. Validation analyses consisted of 59 patients pooled from two international trials. Inter-items correlations for the AIM were good (r > 0.60), except for the Pain item. Internal consistency reliability (α = 0.89) improved after removing the Pain item from the Total Symptom score (TSS). Test-retest reliability was sufficient. Scores significantly improved after paracentesis except for the Pain item. Preliminary estimates indicate that a two-point improvement on the three-item TSS (without the Abdominal Pain item) could be interpreted as clinically meaningful.Conclusion: The Abdominal Pain item appears to behave differently than the other three items, and could be more related to cancer. While the validity of the AIM TSS (four-item) is acceptable, removing the Pain item from the TSS scoring algorithm demonstrated better construct validity. In addition, test-retest reliability and responsiveness were found to be similar to the results for the four-item AIM TSS. The Pain item should be used as a supplemental item to the three-item AIM TSS, as it provides additional information about the underlying cancer state.Keywords: ascites impact measure, symptoms, ovarian cancer, paracentesis

Background: A linguistic validation of the Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire was conducted for 12 European languages, documenting that each translation adequately captures the concepts of the original English-language version of the questionnaire and is readily understood by subjects in the target population., Methods: Native-speaking residents of the target countries who reported urinary problems/lower urinary tract problems were asked to review a translation of the SAGA questionnaire, which was harmonized among 12 languages: Danish, Dutch, English (UK), Finnish, French, German, Greek, Icelandic, Italian, Norwegian, Spanish, and Swedish. During a cognitive debriefing interview, participants were asked to identify any words that were difficult to understand and explain in their own words the meaning of each sentence in the questionnaire. The qualitative analysis was conducted by local linguistic validation teams (original translators, back translator, project manager, interviewer, and survey research expert)., Results: Translations of the SAGA questionnaire from English to 12 European languages were well understood by the participants with an overall comprehension rate across language of 98.9%. In addition, the translations retained the original meaning of the SAGA items and instructions. Comprehension difficulties were identified, and after review by the translation team, minor changes were made to 7 of the 12 translations to improve clarity and comprehension., Conclusions: Conceptual, semantic, and cultural equivalence of each translation of the SAGA questionnaire was achieved thus confirming linguistic validation.

Objectives: To document 1) the content validity and 2) measure improvements in fatigue, using the Fatigue Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) assessment tool in patients with fibromyalgia., Methods: The relevance and comprehensiveness of the Fatigue VAS were tested through a qualitative analysis of 20 subjects' verbatim transcripts from semi-structured qualitative interviews. Data from two randomised, controller trials in fibromyalgia (n=1121) were used to conduct correlation analyses with the Fatigue and Tiredness items from the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) and the Short Form-36 Vitality scale. Known-groups and cross classification analyses were conducted to demonstrate the ability to measure improvement in fatigue using the Fatigue VAS., Results: All subjects spontaneously reported that fatigue was an important symptom to capture in fibromyalgia. The Fatigue VAS was well understood by most subjects (n=18/20). High correlations (Pearson r>0.75) and good agreement (k>0.66) were found between the Fatigue VAS and the FIQ tiredness items no. 16 and 17 and SF-36™ Vitality scale. In both clinical trials there was a substantial separation of approximately 20 points on the mean change in the Fatigue VAS score between responders (>30% improvement in pain VAS) and non-responders., Conclusions: Previous studies have confirmed that fatigue is a major component of the fibromyalgia experience. This current study reports that fibromyalgia patients spontaneously rated fatigue as a highly significant feature of their illness, and supports the use of the Fatigue VAS as a valid questionnaire in fibromyalgia clinical trials.

Background: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in Western countries. Numerous risk factors have been reported but the evidence and strength of association is variable. We aimed to identify those risk factors with strong levels of evidence which could be easily assessed by physicians or ophthalmologists to implement preventive interventions or address current behaviours., Methods: A systematic review identified 18 prospective and cross-sectional studies and 6 case control studies involving 113,780 persons with 17,236 cases of late AMD that included an estimate of the association between late AMD and at least one of 16 pre-selected risk factors. Fixed-effects meta-analyses were conducted for each factor to combine odds ratio (OR) and/or relative risk (RR) outcomes across studies by study design. Overall raw point estimates of each risk factor and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated., Results: Increasing age, current cigarette smoking, previous cataract surgery, and a family history of AMD showed strong and consistent associations with late AMD. Risk factors with moderate and consistent associations were higher body mass index, history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and higher plasma fibrinogen. Risk factors with weaker and inconsistent associations were gender, ethnicity, diabetes, iris colour, history of cerebrovascular disease, and serum total and HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels., Conclusions: Smoking, previous cataract surgery and a family history of AMD are consistent risk factors for AMD. Cardiovascular risk factors are also associated with AMD. Knowledge of these risk factors that may be easily assessed by physicians and general ophthalmologists may assist in identification and appropriate referral of persons at risk of AMD.

Objectives: To investigate the validity of a rescored version of the Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS) to assess the extent of possible bias of a 4-week recall period in assessing sleep in patients with fibromyalgia., Methods: A rescoring algorithm of the JSS was developed. The psychometric properties of the rescored JSS were examined using blinded, observed data from a Phase 2 trial (n=195) in subjects with fibromyalgia. In addition, data from two Phase 3, randomised, controlled trials (n=1,121) in subjects with fibromyalgia were used to further validate the rescored JSS by conducting correlation analyses with other assessments expected to correlate with sleep. These included fatigue and tiredness items from the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36™) Vitality scale., Results: Construct validity of the rescored JSS was found to be acceptable, with an internal consistency reliability of α=0.70. Test-retest reliability on stable subjects, defined using the FIQ total score, was also acceptable (ICC=0.70). Moderate to high correlations (Pearson r>0.66) were found with two FIQ items, addressing fatigue and non-restorative sleep, and the SF-36™ Vitality scale; correlations with the original JSS were similar. Both JSS versions were found to be responsive (p<0.0001), and the rescored version accounted for 90% of the variance captured in the original version., Conclusions: These results showed the rescored JSS performed similarly to the original scale, suggesting the original scale's 4-week recall period did not introduce substantial bias in capturing the experience of fibromyalgia-related sleep disturbances.