Search

Background Breast-conserving surgery is a critical step in treatment with the goal of removing all cancer cells while minimizing the removal of healthy tissue. 15% to 25% of lumpectomy patients have positive margins and require a second surgery to achieve negative margins and reduce the risk of local recurrences. These positive margins are poorly predictive (35% PPV) of cancer left in the cavity, so most second surgeries find no residual cancer. Better detection tools are needed to guide in real-time the removal of cancer missed during the initial lumpectomy to reduce the number of second operations. The pegulicianine imaging agent is injected intravenously before surgery and its fluorescence signal is activated by proteases in tumor cells and cells at the tumor margin. The LUM Imaging System visualizes activated pegulicianine in the lumpectomy cavity via a hand-held detector and proprietary tumor detection software. This system was previously tested in multiple single-site studies and a prospective multi-site study that enrolled 234 patients and showed good ability to detect residual cancer in the lumpectomy cavity. Trial Design and Specific Aims: The current prospective, multi-center, randomized, blinded study was designed to show the clinical efficacy, system accuracy, and safety of the LUM Imaging System. It aims to demonstrate guided removal of residual cancer in the lumpectomy missed during the initial procedure and potentially reduce the rates of positive margins. This study is powered by an event-driven design that requires 70 truth-standard positive events. It is expected that approximately 390 women at fourteen medical centers across the US will be enrolled to achieve the number of events. Pegulicianine is injected 2-6 hours prior to the lumpectomy procedure. Surgeons perform standard of care (SOC) lumpectomy followed by blinded intraoperative imaging of the lumpectomy cavity with the LUM Imaging System in regions where SOC shaves will be taken. The patient is then randomized. If the random assignment is to the device arm, the surgeon is directed to excise margins that have positive LUM signal. Pathologists are blinded to the source of tissue removed (SOC vs. LUM) when conducting the pathology assessment. The amount of additional tissue volume resected is also evaluated. Patient reported outcome data is collected as a quality-of-life survey before and after the subject’s lumpectomy.Eligibility Criteria: This study seeks to enroll women with primary invasive breast cancer (IBC), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or a combination of IBC/DCIS undergoing a lumpectomy for their breast malignancy. Patients must not have a history of allergic reaction to polyethylene glycol, contrast agents, or have received neoadjuvant therapy to treat their current breast cancer. Use of blue dyes before imaging with the LUM System are not allowed. Additional detailed eligibility criteria are listed in the protocol. Accrual and Study Progress To date, 350 subjects have participated in this trial. This study is funded in part by the National Cancer Institute (5R44CA211013). This trial is registered as NCT03686215. Citation Format: Jorge Ferrer, David Carr, Peter Blumencranz, Irene Wapnir, Donna Dyess, Shelly Hwang, Nayana Dekhne, Daleela Dodge, Beth-Ann Lesnikoski, Kelly Hunt, Patricia Clark, Stephanie Valente, Marie Catherine Lee, Lynne Clark, Brian Schlossberg, Sean Madden, Alejandra Rodriguez, Kate Smith, Manna Chang, Barbara Smith. Pivotal study of the Lum imaging system for assisting intraoperative detection of residual cancer in the tumor bed of female patients with breast cancer: The INCITE trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-12-03.

BACKGROUND The Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend modified radical mastectomy (MRM) as the surgical treatment of choice for nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Limited studies have looked into the outcomes of breast conserving surgery (BCS) vs. MRM for IBC. METHODS National Cancer Database (NCDB) data from 2004 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, and overall survival (OS) trends were compared for BCS and MRM cases of nonmetastatic IBC. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 413 (3.89%) BCS and 10,197 (96.11%) MRM cases were identified. Median follow-up was 58.45 months. Compared to MRM, BCS patients were more likely to be older, be African American, have Medicare/Medicaid or be uninsured, live in lower education ZIP codes, and live in a metropolitan area (all p

Background: Standard surgical techniques result in positive lumpectomy margins 20-40% of the time. These positive margins require surgical re-excision which places significant burden on the healthcare system and patients. The LUM Imaging System consists of a fluorescence-based imaging agent, a hand-held wide-field detector (LUM Imaging Device) used to image the surgical cavity walls intraoperatively in real-time after the resection of the main lumpectomy specimen, and a proprietary tumor detection algorithm that highlights regions in the tumor bed suspected to contain residual cancer. This imaging system was previously tested in a single-site clinical study. The current study is evaluating the imaging system in a multi-study, large patient cohort. Trial Design / Methods This trial (NCT03321929) is a non-randomized, open-label, multi-site trial designed to further refine the tumor detection algorithm utilized by the LUM Imaging System. This is a prospective, interventional feasibility study and is a pilot arm to a pivotal study which will evaluate the safety and efficacy of the LUM Imaging System. Up to 250 adult female breast cancer patients undergoing lumpectomies are being enrolled at sixteen medical centers across the US. LUM015, a fluorescence-based imaging agent, is injected prior to the subject’s lumpectomy procedure. Surgeons perform their standard of care lumpectomy followed by intraoperative imaging of the lumpectomy cavity with the LUM Imaging System. Specific Aims The primary objective is to assess performance characteristics of the LUM Imaging System and to refine the tumor detection algorithm. A secondary objective is to develop and refine the process of implementing the LUM Imaging System into institution-specific workflows during lumpectomies. Eligibility Criteria This study seeks to enroll women, over the age of 18 and with histologically or cytologically confirmed primary invasive breast cancer (IBC), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or a combination of IBC/DCIS undergoing a lumpectomy for their breast malignancy. In addition to be willing to follow study procedures, participating in an informed consent discussion, signing an informed consent form, and having baseline lab and screening values within protocol limits, enrolled subjects must meet the following key exclusion criteria: have no history of allergic reaction to polyethylene glycol, no history of allergic reaction to intravenous contrast agents, have not undergone any systemic therapies to treat their cancer, and will not be administered methylene blue or other dye for sentinel lymph node detection during their lumpectomy. Additional detailed eligibility criteria are listed in the protocol. Statistical Methods For categorical variables, summary tabulations of the number and percentage of patients within each category (with a category for missing data) of the parameter will be presented. For continuous variables, the number of patients, mean, median, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum values will be presented. The secondary objective will be met by evaluating a robust training and proficiency protocol for all enrolling institutions. Accrual To date, 208 subjects have participated in this LUM Imaging System trial. Contact Information Jorge Ferrer: jmferrer@lumicell.com Kate Smith: kate@lumicell.com Citation Format: Kate Smith, Jorge Ferrer, David Carr, Peter Blumencranz, Daleela Dodge, Nayana Dekhne, Irene Wapnir, Kelly Hunt, Linsey Gold, Stephanie Valente, Peter Beitsch, Donna Dyess, Shelly Hwang, Lynne Clark, Beth-Ann Lesnikoski, Anees Chagpar, Stephen Karp, Brian Schlossberg, Livia Gjylameti, Barbara Smith. Expansion into multiple institutions for training in the use of the LUM Imaging System for intraoperative detection of residual cancer in the tumor bed of female subjects with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-06-02.

Background: Standard surgical techniques result in positive lumpectomy margins 20-40% of the time. These positive margins require surgical re-excision which places significant burden on the healthcare system and patients. The LUM Imaging System consists of a fluorescent drug, a hand-held wide-field detector (LUM Imaging Device) used to image the surgical cavity walls intraoperatively in real-time after the resection of the main lumpectomy specimen, and a proprietary tumor detection algorithm that highlights regions in the tumor bed suspected to contain residual cancer. Methods: The Intraoperative Detection of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer trial (NCT03321929) is a non-randomized, open-label, multi-site trial. This is a prospective, interventional feasibility study and is a pilot arm to a pivotal study which will further evaluate the safety and efficacy of the LUM Imaging System. This study enrolls women, over the age of 18 and with histologically or cytologically confirmed primary invasive breast cancer (IBC), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or a combination of IBC/DCIS undergoing a lumpectomy for their breast malignancy. LUM015, a fluorescent drug, is injected prior to the subject’s lumpectomy procedure. Surgeons perform their standard of care lumpectomy followed by intraoperative imaging of the lumpectomy cavity with the LUM Imaging System. In real-time, the LUM Imaging System highlights areas within the tumor bed that may contain, residual abnormal tumor tissue. Surgeons remove additional tissue based on the guidance of the LUM Imaging System. A maximum of two additional tissue shaves may be obtained. All excised tissue specimens are evaluated by routine pathology and correlated to the output of the LUM Imaging System. Results and Discussion: Sixteen medical centers across the United States enrolled 234 subjects into this study. Preliminary data on 141 subjects has been evaluated. The median age of enrolled women undergoing surgery using the Lumicell system was 61 years old. The histology of tumor type in women evaluated in this analysis is representative of the general population, with 21% diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), 11% diagnosed with invasive lobular carcinoma, and 64% diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma (with or without DCIS features present). Most women (71%) presented with a palpable mass on physical examination prior to their lumpectomy surgery. Radiological imaging prior to lumpectomy showed scattered areas of fibroglandular density in 49% of the enrolled subjects and heterogeneously dense breast tissue in 42% of the enrolled subjects. The use of the LUM Imaging System positively impacted enrolled subjects; approximately 10% of subjects (N=14) had residual tumor detected and removed from the tumor bed guided by the LUM Imaging System after the standard of care surgery was completed. Without the use of this guidance technology, tumor tissue would have been left behind in this cohort of subjects, potentially requiring additional surgical intervention or other therapy, or local recurrence. The mean absolute volume of tissue removed due to guidance by the Lumicell System was 15 cc corresponding to about 15% of the total tissue removed. The LUM Imaging System correctly identified all positive margins in 28% of subjects with a positive margin after standard of care, and directed excision of additional tissue to create a wider margin. 12% of the patients with positive margins were converted to a negative margin by removing additional tissue guided by this imaging system. Future studies are planned that will measure the sensitivity and specificity of the device. Citation Format: Jorge Ferrer, David Carr, Peter Blumencranz, Daleela Dodge, Nayana Dekhne, Irene Wapnir, Kelly Hunt, Linsey Gold, Stephanie Valente, Peter Beitsch, Donna Dyess, Shelly Hwang, Lynne Clark, Beth-Ann Lesnikoski, Anees Chagpar, Stephen Karp, Brian Schlossberg, Sean Madden, Manna Chang, Kate Smith, David Strasfeld, W David Lee, Barbara Smith. Results from the expansion into multiple institutions for training in the use of the LUM imaging system for intraoperative detection of residual cancer in the tumor bed of female subjects with breast cancer clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-20-06.

Background Accurate identification of the tumor bed after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) ensures appropriate radiation to the tumor bed while minimizing normal tissue exposure. The BioZorb® three-dimensional (3D) bioabsorbable tissue marker provides a reliable target for radiation therapy (RT) planning and follow-up evaluation while serving as a scaffold to maintain breast contour. Methods After informed consent, 818 patients (826 breasts) implanted with the BioZorb® at 14 U.S. sites were enrolled in a national registry. All the patients were prospectively followed with the BioZorb® implant after BCS. The data collected at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months included all demographics, treatment parameters, and provider/patient-assessed cosmesis. Results The median follow-up period was 18.2 months (range, 0.2–53.4 months). The 30-day breast infection rate was 0.5 % of the patients (n = 4), and re-excision was performed for 8.1 % of the patients (n = 66), whereas 2.6 % of the patients (n = 21) underwent mastectomy. Two patients (0.2 %) had local recurrence. The patient-reported cosmetic outcomes at 6, 12, and 24 months were rated as good-to-excellent by 92.4 %, 90.6 %, and 87.3 % of the patients, respectively and similarly by the surgeons. The radiation oncologists reported planning of target volume (PTV) reduction for 46.2 % of the patients receiving radiation boost, with PTV reduction most commonly estimated at 30 %. Conclusions This report describes the first large multicenter study of 818 patients implanted with the BioZorb® tissue marker during BCS. Radiation oncologists found that the device yielded reduced PTVs and that both the patients and the surgeons reported good-to-excellent long-term cosmetic outcomes, with low adverse effects. The BioZorb® 3D tissue marker is a safe adjunct to BCS and may add benefits for both surgeons and radiation oncologists.

Purpose/Objective(s) There is a paucity of data regarding the use of whole breast irradiation (WBI) as part of breast conserving therapy (BCT) in women diagnosed with breast cancer who had undergone prior breast implant-based augmentation. In this population, we investigated various factors that impact radiation related toxicities, including the need for additional cosmetic surgery. Materials/Methods A retrospective review was performed for a single institution, with queries done on health-system medical records, radiation therapy medical records, radiology mammography studies, and internal radiation therapy and toxicity databases. We included patients with a prior history of breast implant-based augmentation who subsequently underwent BCT and WBI. Patient and treatment characteristics were collected and reported, and univariate analyses comparing factors correlating with toxicity endpoints were performed. Long-term cosmesis was assessed by the patient's radiation oncologist during routine follow-up visits via the Harvard grading criteria. Results 35 patients treated at our institution between 2006 and 2020 were included in our analyses, with a median follow up time of 2.4 years. Of these, 28 were treated with conventionally fractionated WBI (1.8-2 Gy/Fx) and 7 were treated with hypofractionated WBI (2.66 Gy/Fx). Good/excellent long-term cosmesis was observed in 94% of all patients. 44% of patients ultimately needed additional cosmetic surgery at some point after radiation. Indications for additional surgery included capsular contracture (10), wound complications (2), implant rupture (1), volume loss (1), and asymmetry (1). Fourteen patients (50%) treated with conventionally fractionated WBI and one patient (14%) patient treated with hypofractionated WBI required additional surgery, but this difference was not significant on UVA (P = 0.12). Other factors found not to be significantly associated with rates of additional surgery included BMI, stage, the volume of the breast receiving 105% or 110% of the prescription dose, and presence or absence of bolus during treatment. No patients experienced local or regional recurrence. Conclusion Patients with a prior history of breast implantation often experience good long-term cosmesis with a moderate risk of needing additional future surgery. The use of hypofractionated WBI was not associated with worse cosmetic outcome or an increase in need for additional cosmetic surgery.

Background Breast-conserving surgery is a critical first step in treatment with the goal of removing all cancer cells while minimizing the removal of healthy tissue. 15% to 25% or more of lumpectomy patients have positive margins and require a second surgery to achieve negative margins and reduce the risk of local recurrences. These positive margins are poorly predictive (35% PPV) of cancer left in the cavity, so most second surgeries find no residual cancer. Better detection tools are needed to identify residual cancer in real time during the initial lumpectomy to reduce the number of second operations. LUM015 is a protease-activated fluorescent imaging agent that accumulates in tumor cells and tumor associated macrophages. The LUM Imaging System camera visualizes the intravenously injected LUM015 in the lumpectomy cavity via a hand-held wide field detector and proprietary tumor detection software. This imaging system was previously tested in multiple single-site studies and a large, prospective multi-site study that enrolled 234 patients and showed good ability to detect residual cancer in the lumpectomy cavity. Trial Design The current prospective, multi-center, randomized, blinded study was designed to demonstrate the clinical efficacy, system accuracy, and safety of the LUM Imaging System. It aims to identify residual cancer in the lumpectomy cavity to reduce the rates of positive margins. This study seeks to enroll women with primary invasive breast cancer (IBC), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or a combination of IBC/DCIS undergoing a lumpectomy for their breast malignancy. Approximately 310 women at 14 US medical centers will be enrolled. This study is powered by an event-driven design that requires 70 patients to be enrolled that have a ‘truth-standard positive' event, which is the identification of cancer in a protocol defined tissue type. To be eligible, patients must not have a history of allergic reaction to polyethylene glycol, intravenous contrast agents, or systemic therapies to treat their cancer. Use of blue dyes before imaging with the LUM System are not allowed. LUM015 is injected prior to the lumpectomy procedure. Surgeons perform standard of care (SOC) lumpectomy and perform blinded intraoperative imaging of the lumpectomy cavity with the LUM Imaging System in regions where SOC shaves will be taken. The patient is then randomized. If the random assignment is to the device arm, the surgeon is directed to excise margins that the LUM System indicates are positive for cancer. Pathologists are blinded to the type of tissue removed when conducting the pathology assessment. Patient reported outcome data is collected as a quality-of-life survey before and after the subject's lumpectomy. Additional detailed eligibility criteria are in the protocol. To date, 166 patients have participated in this trial. This trial is registered as NCT03686215. Citation Format: Jorge Ferrer, David Carr, Peter Blumencranz, Irene Wapnir, Donna Dyess, Shelly Hwang, Nayana Dekhne, Daleela Dodge, Beth-Ann Lesnikoski, Kelly Hunt, Patricia Clark, Stephanie Valente, M. Catherine Lee, Lynne Clark, Brian Schlossberg, Sean Madden, Alejandra Rodriguez, Kate Smith, Manna Chang, Barbara Smith. Pivotal Study of the LUM Imaging System for assisting intraoperative detection of residual cancer in the tumor bed of female patients with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT259.

Background: For many women with breast cancer, breast-conserving surgery is a critical first step in treatment with the goal of removing all cancer cells while minimizing the removal of healthy tissue. 15% to 25% or more of lumpectomy patients have positive margins and require a second surgery to achieve negative margins and reduce the risk of local recurrences. These positive margins are poorly predictive (35% PPV) of cancer left in the cavity, so most second surgeries find no residual cancer. Better detection tools are needed to identify residual cancer in real time during the initial lumpectomy to reduce the number of second operations. LUM015 is a protease-activated fluorescent imaging agent that accumulates in tumor cells and tumor associated macrophages. The LUM Imaging System camera visualizes the intravenously injected LUM015 in the lumpectomy cavity via a hand-held wide field detector and proprietary tumor detection software. This imaging system was previously tested in multiple single-site studies and a large, prospective multi-site study that enrolled 234 patients and showed good ability to detect residual cancer in the lumpectomy cavity. Trial Design: The current prospective multi-center, two-arm randomized, blinded study was designed to demonstrate the clinical efficacy, system accuracy, and safety of the LUM Imaging System. It aims to identify residual cancer in the lumpectomy cavity in order to reduce the rates of positive margins. This study seeks to enroll women with confirmed primary invasive breast cancer (IBC), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or a combination of IBC/DCIS undergoing a lumpectomy for their breast malignancy. The planned enrollment is 170 women being treated at fifteen medical centers across the US. To be eligible, patients must not have a history of allergic reaction to polyethylene glycol, intravenous contrast agents, or systemic therapies to treat their cancer. Use of blue dyes before imaging with the LUM System are not allowed. LUM015 is injected prior to the lumpectomy procedure. Surgeons perform standard of care (SOC) lumpectomy and perform blinded intraoperative imaging of the lumpectomy cavity with the LUM Imaging System in any regions where SOC shaves will be taken. The patient is then randomized either the further use of device or not. If the random assignment is to the device arm, the surgeon is directed to excise margins that the LUM System indicates are positive for cancer. Pathologists are blinded to the type of tissue removed when conducting the pathology assessment. Patient reported outcome data is collected as a quality of life survey before and after the subject's surgery. Additional detailed eligibility criteria are listed in the protocol. To date, 22 subjects have participated in this trial. This trial is registered as NCT03686215. Citation Format: Jorge Ferrer, David Carr, Irene Wapnir, Kelly Hunt, Peter Blumencranz, Nayana Dekhne, Daleela Dodge, Donna Lynn Dyess, Shelley Hwang, Stephanie Valente, Lynne Clark, Beth-Ann Lesnikoski, Anees Chagpar, Paticia Clark, Marie Catherine Lee, Brian Schlossberg, Sean Madden, Livia Gjylameti, Manna Chang, Kate Smith, Barbara Smith. Pivotal study of the LUM Imaging System for assisting intraoperative detection of residual cancer in the tumor bed of female patients with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT281.

// Bryan J. Thibodeau 1 , Vincent Lavergne 2 , Nayana Dekhne 3 , Pamela Benitez 3 , Mitual Amin 4 , Samreen Ahmed 1 , Jean L. Nakamura 2 , Philip R. Davidson 5 , Alice O. Nakamura 5 , Inga S. Grills 6 , Peter Y. Chen 6 , Jessica Wobb 6 and George D. Wilson 1, 6 1 Beaumont BioBank, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA 3 Department of Surgery, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA 4 Department of Pathology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA 5 Department of Finance and Statistical Analysis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 6 Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA Correspondence to: George D. Wilson, email: george.wilson@beaumont.edu Keywords: angiosarcoma; radiation-associated; breast; mutational signature; next generation sequencing Received: September 15, 2017 Accepted: October 13, 2017 Published: January 19, 2018 ABSTRACT Purpose: Radiation-associated breast angiosarcomas are a rare complication of radiation therapy for breast carcinoma. With relatively little is known about the genetic abnormalities present in these secondary tumors, we examined genomic variation in biospecimens from radiation-associated breast angiosarcomas. Experimental Design: Patients were identified that had a previous breast cancer diagnosis, received radiation therapy, and developed angiosarcoma in the ipsilateral breast as the earlier cancer. Tumor regions were isolated from archival blocks using subsequent laser capture microdissection. Next generation sequencing was performed using a targeted panel of 160 cancer-related genes. Genomic variants were identified for mutation and trinucleotide-based mutational signature analysis. Results: 44 variants in 34 genes were found in more than two thirds of the cases; this included 12 variants identified as potentially deleterious. Of particular note, the BRCA1 DNA damage response pathway was highly enriched with genetic variation. In a comparison to local recurrences, 14 variants in 11 genes were present in both the primary and recurrent lesions including variants in genes associated with the DNA damage response machinery. Furthermore, the mutational signature analysis shows that a previously defined IR signature is present in almost all of the current samples characterized by predominantly C→T substitutions. Conclusions: While radiation-associated breast angiosarcomas are relatively uncommon, their prognosis is very poor. These data demonstrate a mutational pattern associated with genes involved in DNA repair. While important in revealing the biology behind these tumors, it may also suggest new treatment strategies that will prove successful.

Purpose: To examine the rate of breast reconstruction failure and cosmetic outcomes following post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) with temporary tissue expander or implant in place. Methods and Materials: Ninety-four patients with 95 primary breast malignancies underwent mastectomy and immediate tissue expander reconstruction followed by PMRT. Ninety tissue expanders and five implants were irradiated. All patients received a dose of 5,400 cGy given in 180 cGy fractions. Twenty-one patients (22%) received tangents alone and seventy-four patients (78%) were treated with tangents and a supraclavicular field via a mono-isocentric technique. Bolus was used in 91 patients (96%). Eighty-eight patients (93%) received chemotherapy and 78 patients (82%) received endocrine therapy. Results: With a median follow up of 22.4 months, nineteen patients (20%) developed a reconstruction failure. Ten patients lost their tissue expanders with a median time to reconstruction failure of 7 months (range 3–9 months) while ten patients lost their permanent implant with a median time to loss of 19 months (range 9–31 months) following PMRT. The one and two-year actuarial rate of reconstruction failure was 11.2% and 24.9%, respectively. The most common cause of failure was infection (37%), followed by skin break down (21%), extrusion of expander or implant (16%), fibrosis/eschar (11%), trauma (11%) and pain (5%). Out of the 19 failures, eight patients were salvaged with an autologous flap reconstruction. Univariate analysis was performed to examine the association between age, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, menopause status, weight and the use of a third supraclavicular RT field on reconstruction failure. However no risk factors were found to be associated with reconstruction failure. In patients who did not have reconstruction failure, good/excellent cosmesis was observed in 79% of patients and fair/poor cosmesis was observed in 21% of patients. Conclusions: In our series of women with a high risk of recurrence, PMRT with a tissue expander in place followed by a prosthetic implant provides good cosmesis in the majority of women with an acceptable risk of expander or implant loss. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-04.

Background: Standard surgical techniques result in positive lumpectomy margins 20-40% of the time. These positive margins require surgical re-excision which places significant burden on the healthcare system and patients. The LUM Imaging System consists of a fluorescence-based imaging agent, a hand-held wide-field detector (LUM Imaging Device) used to image the surgical cavity walls intraoperatively in real-time after the resection of the main lumpectomy specimen, and a proprietary tumor detection algorithm that highlights regions in the tumor bed suspected to contain residual cancer. This imaging system was previously tested in a single-site clinical study. The current study is evaluating the imaging system in a multi-study, large patient cohort. Trial Design / Methods This trial (NCT03321929) is a non-randomized, open-label, multi-site trial designed to further refine the tumor detection algorithm utilized by the LUM Imaging System. This is a prospective, interventional feasibility study and is a pilot arm to a pivotal study which will evaluate the safety and efficacy of the LUM Imaging System. Up to 250 adult female breast cancer patients undergoing lumpectomies are being enrolled at sixteen medical centers across the US. LUM015, a fluorescence-based imaging agent, is injected prior to the subject’s lumpectomy procedure. Surgeons perform their standard of care lumpectomy followed by intraoperative imaging of the lumpectomy cavity with the LUM Imaging System. Specific Aims The primary objective is to assess performance characteristics of the LUM Imaging System and to refine the tumor detection algorithm. A secondary objective is to develop and refine the process of implementing the LUM Imaging System into institution-specific workflows during lumpectomies. Eligibility Criteria This study seeks to enroll women, over the age of 18 and with histologically or cytologically confirmed primary invasive breast cancer (IBC), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or a combination of IBC/DCIS undergoing a lumpectomy for their breast malignancy. In addition to be willing to follow study procedures, participating in an informed consent discussion, signing an informed consent form, and having baseline lab and screening values within protocol limits, enrolled subjects must meet the following key exclusion criteria: have no history of allergic reaction to polyethylene glycol, no history of allergic reaction to intravenous contrast agents, have not undergone any systemic therapies to treat their cancer, and will not be administered methylene blue or other dye for sentinel lymph node detection during their lumpectomy. Additional detailed eligibility criteria are listed in the protocol. Statistical Methods For categorical variables, summary tabulations of the number and percentage of patients within each category (with a category for missing data) of the parameter will be presented. For continuous variables, the number of patients, mean, median, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum values will be presented. The secondary objective will be met by evaluating a robust training and proficiency protocol for all enrolling institutions. Accrual To date, 208 subjects have participated in this LUM Imaging System trial. Contact Information Jorge Ferrer: jmferrer@lumicell.com Kate Smith: kate@lumicell.com Citation Format: Kate Smith, Jorge Ferrer, David Carr, Peter Blumencranz, Daleela Dodge, Nayana Dekhne, Irene Wapnir, Kelly Hunt, Linsey Gold, Stephanie Valente, Peter Beitsch, Donna Dyess, Shelly Hwang, Lynne Clark, Beth-Ann Lesnikoski, Anees Chagpar, Stephen Karp, Brian Schlossberg, Livia Gjylameti, Barbara Smith. Expansion into multiple institutions for training in the use of the LUM Imaging System for intraoperative detection of residual cancer in the tumor bed of female subjects with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-06-02.

BACKGROUND: Data on patients who received breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for early stage breast cancer were examined to detect differences in disease presentation, management techniques, long-term treatment outcomes, and toxicities based on race. METHODS: Six hundred ninety-nine women with breast cancer (39 African-American [AA] women and 660 Caucasian [C] women) who received BCT were analyzed on race, clinical and pathologic characteristics at presentation, management techniques, treatment-related toxicities, recurrence, and survival. The median follow-up was 12.2 years. RESULTS: At diagnosis, AA women were younger (aged

The authors reviewed changes in the initial clinical presentation, management techniques, and patterns of disease recurrence over time (1981-1996) in patients with breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) at a single institution. The goals of the current study were to determine the frequency and use of optimal local and systemic therapy techniques and to evaluate the impact of these changes on treatment efficacy.Six hundred seven patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage I or II invasive breast carcinomas treated with BCT at William Beaumont Hospital (Royal Oak, MI) constituted the study population. All patients received at least an excisional biopsy of the primary tumor, an axillary lymph node staging procedure, and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) (a median tumor bed dose of 61 Gray [Gy] was administered). All sides were reviewed by one pathologist. Numerous clinicopathologic and treatment-related factors were analyzed to monitor changes that occurred over time. Changes in patterns of disease recurrence and treatment efficacy over time also were analyzed.Over the time period analyzed, changes at initial presentation included an increase in the mean age at diagnosis (age 56.1 years vs. 61.4 years; P0.001), a decrease in the number of patients with clinically palpable tumors (78% vs. 36%; P0.001), a decrease in the mean tumor size (2.2 cm vs. 1.6 cm; P0.001), but no change in the percentage of patients with negative lymph nodes (79% vs. 78%; P = 0.83). No differences over time were observed in mean tumor grade (2.0 vs. 1.9; P = 0.2) or the presence of angiolymphatic invasion (27% vs. 26%; P = 0.25). Changes in surgical management and pathologic assessment included the more frequent use of reexcision (46% vs. 81%; P0.001), larger mean total volumes of breast tissue specimens excised (115 cm3 vs. 189 cm3; P = 0.001), a larger percentage of patients with final negative surgical margins (74% vs. 97%; P0.001), and a small increase in the mean number of lymph nodes excised (13.8 lymph nodes vs. 14.1 lymph nodes; P = 0.01). The only other significant change in the pathologic management of patients over time included a doubling in the mean number of slides examined (10.6 slides vs. 21.1 slides; P0.001). Changes in adjuvant local and systemic therapy included an increase in the percentage of patients treated with60 Gy to the tumor bed (66% vs. 95%; P0.001), a doubling in the mean number of days from the last surgery to the start of RT (24 days vs. 50 days; P0.001), and a decrease in the use of regional lymph node RT (24% vs. 8%; P0.001). The use of adjuvant tamoxifen increased from 10% to 61% (P0.001). Finally, improvements were observed in the 5-year and 12-year actuarial rates of local disease recurrence (8% vs. 1% and 21% vs. 9%, respectively; P = 0.001) and distant metastases (12% vs. 4% and 22% vs. 9%, respectively; P = 0.006). No changes in the mean number of years to ipsilateral (6.5 years vs. 6.4 years; P = 0.59) or distant disease recurrence (4.6 years vs. 3.8 years; P = 0.73) were observed.The impact of screening mammography and substantial changes in surgical, pathologic, RT, and systemic therapy recommendations were observed over time in the study population. These changes were associated with improvements in 5-year and 12-year local and distant control rates and suggested that improvements in outcome can be realized through adherence to best practice guidelines and continuous monitoring of treatment outcome data.

BACKGROUND. The molecular classification system categorizes invasive breast carcinomas according to their key driving biomarkers. In the current study, the authors evaluated whether response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was correlated with the molecular classification groups. METHODS. Using immunohistochemistry, the molecular classification group (luminal-A, luminal-B, HER-2–variant, HER-2–classic, and basal phenotype) was retrospectively determined in 68 breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS. A total of 28 carcinoma patients (41.2%) achieved a compete pathologic response (CPR), including 2 of 15 patients classified as having luminal-A (13.3%), 4 of 16 patients classified as having luminal-B (25.0%), 10 of 12 patients classified as having HER-2–classic (83.3%), none of the 4 patients classified as having HER-2–variant, and 12 of 21 patients classified as having basal phenotype (57.1%) neoplasms. The CPR rate among patients with the HER-2–classic and basal neoplasms was 67% (22 of 33 neoplasms), compared with 17.1% (6 of 35 neoplasms) in the non-HER-2–classic/basal combined group (P < .001). Eleven carcinomas were initially diagnosed as invasive lobular carcinomas (pleomorphic and classic), 4 of which were luminal-A, 4 of which were luminal-B, 2 of which were HER-2–classic, and 1 of which was basal. On review, only 3 of these 11 cases remained classified as classic lobular carcinoma, all of which were classified as luminal-A, and none of these patients achieved a CPR. Four of the other 8 patients achieved a CPR. CONCLUSIONS. The molecular classification system is useful for identifying carcinoma patients who are most likely and those who are least likely to achieve a CPR. In the current study, all the morphologically classic lobular carcinomas were classified as luminal-A neoplasms, which may explain the low rate of CPR reported. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.