Search

It is unknown if patients with neuromuscular diseases prefer in-person or virtual telemedicine visits. We studied patient opinions and preference on virtual versus in-person visits, and the factors influencing such preferences.Telephone surveys, consisting of 11 questions, of patients from 10 neuromuscular centers were completed.Five hundred and twenty surveys were completed. Twenty-six percent of respondents preferred virtual visits, while 50% preferred in-person visits. Sixty-four percent reported physical interaction as "very important." For receiving a new diagnosis, 55% preferred in-person vs 35% reporting no preference. Forty percent were concerned about a lack of physical examination vs 20% who were concerned about evaluating vital signs. Eighty four percent reported virtual visits were sufficiently private. Sixty eight percent did not consider expenses a factor in their preference. Although 92% were comfortable with virtual communication technology, 55% preferred video communications, and 19% preferred phone calls. Visit preference was not significantly associated with gender, diagnosis, disease severity, or symptom management. Patients who were concerned about a lack of physical exam or assessment of vitals had significantly higher odds of selecting in-person visits than no preference.Although neither technology, privacy, nor finance burdened patients in our study, more patients preferred in-person visits than virtual visits and 40% were concerned about a lack of physical examination. Interactions that occur with in-person encounters had high importance for patients, reflecting differences in the perception of the patient-physician relationship between virtual and in-person visits.

There is a growing need for brief screening measures for HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND). We compared two commonly used measures (the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] and the International HIV Dementia Scale [IHDS]) in their ability to identify asymptomatic HAND (i.e., asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment [ANI]). Participants included 74 Thai PLWH: 38 met Frascati criteria for ANI and 36 were cognitively normal (CN). Participants completed Thai language versions of the MoCA (MoCA-T) and IHDS, and a validated neurocognitive battery. We examined between-group differences for MoCA-T and IHDS total scores, and scale subcomponents. We also conducted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to determine the ability of the MoCA-T and IHDS to discriminate between CN and ANI groups, and compared their area under the curve (AUC) values. Results revealed lower MoCA-T total score, as well as the Visuospatial/Executive and Delayed Recall subtask scores, in the ANI relative to CN group. Groups did not differ on the IHDS. For ROC analyses, the MoCA-T, but not the IHDS, significantly differentiated the ANI from CN group, and there was a significant difference in AUC values between the MoCA-T (AUC = .71) and IHDS (AUC = .56). Sensitivity and specificity statistics were poor for both screening measures. These data indicate while the MoCA-T functions better than the IHDS in detecting Thai PLWH with ANI, the mildest form of HAND, neither cognitive screener, showed strong utility. Our findings reflect the limited efficacy of common screening measures in detecting subtler cognitive deficits among Thai PLWH, and highlight the need for better screening tools.

Mismatch between whole-brain death criteria embedded in statutes and accepted tests physicians use to diagnose brain death have clinical and ethical implications that could undermine public trust in death pronouncements. We consider merits and drawbacks of 4 ways to address this problem.

Background and ObjectivesPeripheral nerve impairments and dementia are common among older adults and share risk factors. However, few studies have examined whether peripheral nerve function and dementia are associated. We evaluated whether lower extremity peripheral nerve impairments were associated with higher incidence of dementia and whether associations differed by comorbidity subgroups (diabetes, low vitamin B12, and APOE ε4 allele carriers).MethodsWe studied Black and White Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study participants 70 to 79 years of age and without dementia at enrollment. Lower extremity sensory and motor peripheral nerve function was measured at year 4 (the analytic baseline of this study). Sensory nerve impairments were measured with monofilament (1.4 g, 10 g) and vibration threshold of the toe. Monofilament insensitivity was defined as unable to detect monofilament (3 of 4 touches), and vibration detection impairment was defined as >130 μm. Fibular motor impairments were defined as ResultsAmong 2,174 participants (52% women, 35% Black), 45% could not detect monofilament 1.4 g, 9% could not detect monofilament 10 g, 6% could not feel vibration, 10% had low CMAP amplitude, and 24% had slow conduction velocity. Monofilament 10 g (hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95% CI 0.99–1.84) and vibration detection insensitivity (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.24–2.40) were associated/borderline associated with a higher risk of dementia after covariate adjustment. Estimates were elevated but not significant for monofilament 1.4 g, CMAP amplitude, and conduction velocity (p > 0.05). Increasing number of peripheral nerve impairments was associated with higher risk of dementia in a graded fashion; for ≥3 impairments, the HR was 2.37 (95% CI 1.29–4.38). In subgroup analyses, effect estimates were generally higher among those with diabetes, low vitamin B12, and APOE ε4 allele except for vibration detection.DiscussionPeripheral nerve impairments, especially sensory, were associated with a higher risk of dementia even after adjustment for age and other health factors. These associations may represent a shared susceptibility to nervous system degeneration.

Xinyi Qian,1,2 Ling Yue,1,2 David Mellor,3 Nathaniel M Robbins,4 Wei Li,1,2 Shifu Xiao1,2 1Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia; 4Department of Neurology (N.M.R.), Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USACorrespondence: Wei Li; Shifu Xiao, Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 21-34773758; +86 21-64387250, Email 822203867@qq.com; xiaoshifu@msn.comPurpose: Elderly individuals with degenerative diseases of the central nervous system are more likely to develop peripheral neuropathy; however, research is limited as to whether the decline in peripheral nerve conduction can be used as a biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease (AD).Patients and Methods: This study enrolled 74 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 21 with AD, and 82 healthy elderly individuals. All participants underwent a peripheral nerve conduction and neuropsychological evaluation. Nicolet EDX was used to assess peripheral nerve conduction in the limbs and comparisons were made between the three cognitive groups. Furthermore, the relationship between peripheral nerve conduction and cognitive function was investigated.Results: A ladder-shaped difference was found in the median (p < 0.001) and common peroneal (p < 0.001) motor nerve velocity, with the control group > MCI group > AD group, even after controlling for variables. The median motor nerve amplitude in the AD group was lower than that in the control group (P = 0.017). After controlling for age, sex, education, and height, the median motor nerve velocity was positively correlated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (r = 0.196, p = 0.015), and the common peroneal motor nerve velocity was positively correlated with verbal fluency task-idioms (r = 0.184, p = 0.026). The median (AUC: 0.777, p < 0.001) and common peroneal motor nerve velocities (AUC: 0.862; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the diagnosis of AD. The accuracy rate of these two motor nerve velocities to predict AD was 51.5%.Conclusion: Our study found that peripheral motor nerve velocity may correlate with early cognitive impairment in AD. However, the accuracy of different cognitive classifications and the value of early diagnosis are not ideal when peripheral motor nerve velocity is used alone. Whether peripheral nerve function can be used as a marker for early diagnosis of AD needs further clarification but provides a new possibility for the future of biomarker research.Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, peripheral motor nerve velocity, biomarker, cognition

Black people living in the United States suffer disproportionate morbidity and mortality across a wide range of neurologic conditions. Despite common conceptions to the contrary, “race” is a socially defined construct with little genetic validity. Therefore, racial health inequities in neurology (“neurodisparities”) are not a consequence of biologic differences between races. Instead, racism and associated social determinants of health are the root of neurodisparities. To date, many neurologists have neglected racism as a root cause of neurologic disease, further perpetuating the problem. Structural racism, largely ignored in current neurologic practice and policy, drives neurodisparities through mediators such as excessive poverty, inferior health insurance, and poorer access to neurologic and preventative care. Interpersonal racism (implicit or explicit) and associated discriminatory practices in neurologic research, workforce advancement, and medical education also exacerbate neurodisparities. Neurologists cannot fulfill their professional and ethical responsibility to care for Black patients without understanding how racism, not biologic race, drives neurodisparities. In our review of race, racism, and race-based disparities in neurology, we highlight the current literature on neurodisparities across a wide range of neurologic conditions and focus on racism as the root cause. We discuss why all neurologists are ethically and professionally obligated to actively promote measures to counteract racism. We conclude with a call for actions that should be implemented by individual neurologists and professional neurologic organizations to mitigate racism and work towards health equity in neurology.

Some causes of spastic paraplegia are treatable and many are not. Diagnostic work-up to determine the etiology can be costly and invasive. Here we report the case of a man with slowly progressive spastic paraparesis. Using a multigene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, we identified a novel variant in the consensus splice site of the SPAST gene (exon 13, c.1536G>A, heterozygous), affecting codon 512 of the SPAST mRNA. The observed variant segregated with the disease in four tested family members. In this case, genetic confirmation obviated the need for additional testing such as MRI and lumbar puncture and helped the patient and his family understand his condition and prognosis. We conclude with a brief discussion of the SPG4/SPAST gene and the role of multigene panels in the diagnosis and management of hereditary spastic paraplegia.

There is a growing need for brief screening measures for HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND). We compared two commonly used measures (the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] and the International HIV Dementia Scale [IHDS]) in their ability to identify asymptomatic HAND (i.e., asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment [ANI]). Participants included 74 Thai PLWH: 38 met Frascati criteria for ANI and 36 were cognitively normal (CN). Participants completed Thai language versions of the MoCA (MoCA-T) and IHDS, and a validated neurocognitive battery. We examined between-group differences for MoCA-T and IHDS total scores, and scale subcomponents. We also conducted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to determine the ability of the MoCA-T and IHDS to discriminate between CN and ANI groups, and compared their area under the curve (AUC) values. Results revealed lower MoCA-T total score, as well as the Visuospatial/Executive and Delayed Recall subtask scores, in the ANI relative to CN group. Groups did not differ on the IHDS. For ROC analyses, the MoCA-T, but not the IHDS, significantly differentiated the ANI from CN group, and there was a significant difference in AUC values between the MoCA-T (AUC = .71) and IHDS (AUC = .56). Sensitivity and specificity statistics were poor for both screening measures. These data indicate while the MoCA-T functions better than the IHDS in detecting Thai PLWH with ANI, the mildest form of HAND, neither cognitive screener, showed strong utility. Our findings reflect the limited efficacy of common screening measures in detecting subtler cognitive deficits among Thai PLWH, and highlight the need for better screening tools.

ObjectiveTo detail the scope, nature, and disclosure of financial conflicts of interest (COI) between the pharmaceutical and medical device industries (Industry) and authors in high-impact clinical neurology journals.MethodsUsing the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments Database (OPD), we retrieved information on payments from Industry to 2,000 authors from randomly selected 2016 articles in 5 journals. We categorized payments by type (research, general, and associated research/institutional), sponsoring entity, and year (from 2013 to 2016). Each author's self-disclosures were compared to OPD-listed Industry relationships to measure discordance. Payments were manually reviewed to identify those from manufacturers of products that were directly tested or discussed in the article. We also quantified the prevalence and value of these nondisclosed, relevant COI.ResultsTwo hundred authors from 158 articles had at least 1 OPD payment. Median/mean annual payments per author were $4,229/$19,586 (general); $1,702/$5,966 (research); and $67,512/$362,102 (associated research). Most neurologists received 10% of authors) received more than $10,000 per year, and several received over $1 million. Of 3,013 payments deemed directly relevant to the article, 50.9% were not self-disclosed by the authors, totaling $5,782,197 ($1,665,603 general; $25,532 research; $4,091,062 associated research).ConclusionIndustry-related financial relationships are prevalent among United States–based physicians publishing in major neurology journals, and incomplete self-disclosure is common. As a profession, academic and other neurologists must work to establish firm rules to ensure and manage disclosure of financial COI.

Organ donation after the circulatory determination of death (DCDD) accounts for a growing percentage of deceased organ donations. Although hospital DCDD protocols stipulate donor death determination, some do not adhere to national guidelines that require mechanical, not electrical, asystole. Surrogate decisions to withdraw life-sustaining therapy should be separated from decisions to donate organs. Donor families should be given sufficient information about the DCDD protocol and its impact on the dying process to provide informed consent, and donors should be given proper palliative care during dying. An unresolved ethical question is whether and how donor consent should be seen as authorizing manipulation of a living donor during the dying process solely for to benefit of the organ recipient.

Brain death has been accepted as a legal definition of death in most countries, but practices for determining brain death vary widely. One source of variation is in the use of ancillary tests to assist in the diagnosis of brain death. Through case-based discussions with 3 experts from 3 continents, this article discusses selected aspects of brain death, with a focus on the use of ancillary tests. In particular, we explore the following questions: Are ancillary tests necessary, or is the clinical examination sufficient? What ancillary tests are preferred, and under which circumstances? Are ancillary tests required when the primary mechanism of injury is brainstem injury? Should the family's wishes play a role in the need for ancillary tests? The same case-based questions were posed to the rest of our readership in an online survey, the preliminary results of which are also presented.

Objective: To determine the safety of domperidone in the treatment of nausea associated with dihydroergotamine (DHE) infusion and headache. Methods: We audited our use of domperidone for the inpatient management of nausea, focusing on known safety concerns, particularly potential cardiac arrhythmias. Results: We reviewed 103 consecutive admissions of 90 patients admitted for IV DHE by infusion. Most admissions were to treat chronic migraine with (n = 53) or without (n = 46) aura. Domperidone was administered in 85 of 103 encounters and was well-tolerated at doses up to 80 mg/d. A significant side effect, akathisia, was observed in one patient. Baseline ECG with corrected QT interval (QTc) was obtained on all patients. Repeat ECG after domperidone was obtained in 21 patients, whose baseline characteristics did not differ from the group as a whole. ECG was interpreted blindly by a cardiac electrophysiologist. QTc did not differ before and after domperidone administration (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, median [interquartile range] 435.0 [410.5–453.0] at admission and 427.0 [399.0–452.5] after domperidone; p = 0.15). In combination with other antiemetics, domperidone was effective in treating nausea such that no patients had refractory nausea severe enough to limit DHE dose. Conclusions: This retrospective audit demonstrates that domperidone is safe in the treatment of nausea associated with inpatient DHE infusion and headache. While larger prospective trials are necessary to confirm these results and assess efficacy, current evidence and clinical experience suggests that domperidone is safe and useful for nausea and headache management. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with headache undergoing DHE infusion, domperidone is safe and effective in the treatment of nausea.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are relatively common, accounting for 5-40% of visits to tertiary epilepsy centers. Inpatient video-electroencephalogram (vEEG) monitoring is the gold standard for diagnosis, but additional positive predictive tools are necessary given vEEG's relatively scarce availability. In this study, we investigated if the number of patient-reported allergies distinguishes between PNES and epilepsy. Excessive allergy-reporting, like PNES, may reflect somatization. Using electronic medical records, ICD-9 codes, and text-identification algorithms to search EEG reports, we identified 905 cases of confirmed PNES and 5187 controls with epilepsy but no PNES. Patients with PNES averaged more self-reported allergies than patients with epilepsy alone (1.93 vs. 1.00, p

We thank Machado and Estevez for their comment on our article.1 We agree that ancillary tests clearly have a role in the diagnosis of brain death, but the issue is complex, as the 3 experts pointed out in their commentaries. We also agree that the case 3 they cited in their article (Jahi McMath) is an important case that requires further study to interpret correctly.2

Background HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remain problematic even in the antiretroviral therapy (ART) era. Efavirenz (EFV) is well known for neuropsychiatric side effects and has been associated with worsening neurocognitive performance (NC). We hypothesized that switching from an ART regimen with EFV to one with rilpivirine (RPV) would improve NC. Methods This single-center, open-label, superiority, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital June 2018 to March 2019. HIV- infected adults (≥18 years), virologically suppressed on an EFV-containing regimen for at least 12 months, who met Frascati’s criteria of asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI), were randomized to a switching arm (RPV-containing regimen) vs. a control arm (EFV-containing regimen). The primary objective was to compare the improvement of NC at month 6 (M6) after switching. Secondary outcomes were individual NC domains, tolerability, and safety after switching regimens. Results 20 ANI participants (10 per group) completed the study. 11 participants showed NC improvement at M6: 6 in the switching arm and 5 in the control arm. Global neuro deficit scores (GDS), figure learning, and figure memory at M6 significantly improved in both arms (P < 0.05). Verbal memory and speed of information processing improved over time in the switching arm only (0.6 (0.1–1.0); P = 0.02, and 0.7 (0.1–1.2); P = 0.03, respectively). However, no significant differences between the two groups were observed. Male gender, age < 50 and initiation of ART within 5 years after diagnosis all trended toward an association with improved NC. No tolerability issues or clinical significant adverse events were reported. Conclusion Despite some positive trends, switching from an EFV-containing regimen did not significantly improve NC. This finding was consistent with previous reports. A larger study with longer follow-up may be warranted. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Dementia is a common condition that impacts the patient, the family, and society. Currently, a diagnosis of dementia evokes hopelessness in the afflicted, and society provides few resources or systematic support for caregivers or for demented patients. In this commentary, we discuss the origins of hopelessness in dementia, the World Health Organization's six-stage framework of dementia care, and barriers to "normalizing" the experience of dementia in order to provide beneficent and humane care for patients with dementia. We also offer recommendations for clinicians who care for patients who feel that a life with dementia is not worth living.

Reduced delivery of glucose and oxygen during brain ischemia can cause energy failure (ATP depletion), which can in turn trigger processes leading to cell death. Glucose can support glycolytic ATP production even in the absence of oxygen, and it would seem to follow that increased glucose in the residual blood flow to ischemic brain should increase cell survival. This was tested experimentally in a rat model of ischemia/reperfusion by Pulsinelli et al1 several decades ago. Glucose had a striking effect, but in the direction opposite to what might be expected: rats in which circulating blood glucose was increased by intravenous infusion had far more extensive brain injury and mortality compared with normoglycemic rats. This experiment has subsequently been revisited dozens of times, using different animal species, stroke models, glucose concentrations, timing of glucose elevations, and permutations of these factors. The net result is one of the most robust in all of stroke research: hyperglycemia almost always exacerbates brain injury.2,3 Clinical experience mirrors the animal literature in these respects, because both retrospective studies and patient registries show a striking correlation between elevated admission glucose concentrations and poor outcomes.4 Hyperglycemia is similarly associated with increased hemorrhage formation and poor outcome in patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator.5–7 Random blood glucose levels are ≈4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L in both humans and rodents, with rodents being the species most commonly used for experimental stroke. The definition of hyperglycemia varies somewhat in stroke studies, ranging from 6.1 to >10 mmol/L glucose. Using these definitions, hyperglycemia is found at presentation in 30% to 60% of all patients with stroke.8,9 Some of these patients are diabetic, but acute, poststroke hyperglycemia is a sympathomimetic stress response in most. Despite the frequency of hyperglycemia in stroke and >30 …

OBJECTIVE To determine if better antiretroviral (ARV) central nervous system (CNS) penetration is associated with reduced rates of chronic pain in people living with HIV (PLWH). BACKGROUND Chronic pain remains prevalent in PLWH despite widespread ARV use. Mechanisms underlying this prevalence remain unknown, though neuroinflammation from persistent CNS HIV infection and maladaptive plastic changes in the CNS have been implicated. Here we hypothesize that better CNS ARV penetration, measured using the CNS Penetration-Effectiveness (CPE) score, would decrease rates of chronic pain. METHODS We interviewed 254 consecutive adults from an HIV clinic in Chiang Mai, Thailand. We collected data on demographics, HIV history, ARV use, and pain characteristics. Patients were evaluated for depression using a Thai two question Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2). Modified CPE score was calculated using established methods and grouped a priori into "low CPE" (≤7, poor penetration) and "high CPE" (≥8, good penetration). CPE score was compared with chronic pain scores in SPSS using appropriate statistical tests. A relationship between CPE score and a positive depression screen was tested further using multivariable binary logistic models. RESULTS 245 of 254 subjects were on ARVs. Complete ARV data was available for 235 patients. 137 of these 235 patients (58.3%) had a CPE score ≤7, and 98 (41.7%) had a score ≥8. 49 patients had chronic pain, and 9 had neuropathic pain. Low CPE score was not associated with chronic pain (p=0.64), neuropathic pain (p=0.56), or frequent pain (p=0.80), nor was it associated with the severity of reported "worst pain" or "average pain" in the last 24 hours (p=0.18 and 0.48, respectively). Post-hoc analysis revealed that higher CPE score was a significant independent risk factor for depression measured by a positive PHQ-2 screen [OR (95% CI) = 1.29 (1.04-1.61), p=0.02]. This relationship was mediated primarily by exposure to zidovudine. CONCLUSIONS CPE score is not associated with chronic pain in PLWH. Post-hoc analysis demonstrated that CPE score, and zidovudine exposure in particular, predicts a positive depression screen. Given the substantial morbidity associated with chronic pain and mood disorders in PLWH, additional studies to determine preventable and treatable factors are imperative.

I read with interest the article by Hocker et al.1 I took care of a 45-year-old man several years ago with neurotropic squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (T2N0M0). His brother and paternal uncle had testicular cancer, and his mother had breast cancer. Three months after his initial resection, he developed neuropathic pain of the tongue, and MRI showed tumor recurrence. Two weeks later, he developed classic Miller-Fisher syndrome with mild ophthalmoparesis, ataxia, areflexia, elevated CSF protein, and an elevated anti-Gq1b. He was treated with IV immunoglobulin and did well. Two weeks later, he underwent repeat surgery. In the days following this, he developed neuropathic pain in the right shoulder that persisted for a month and was followed by atrophy and weakness in several right arm muscles. Clinical and electrodiagnostic testing confirmed a diagnosis of brachial neuritis.

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare neuropathy that is often treatable with immunomodulatory therapy if diagnosed early. However, accurate diagnosis is difficult due to a significant overlap of symptoms with other neurological conditions, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Evidence of immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti-ganglioside GM1 antibodies and electrodiagnostic findings of conduction block are useful diagnostic criteria for MMN but are not universal findings. This review explores the differential diagnosis of MMN and ALS and discusses three cases of MMN initially diagnosed as ALS, in which the correct diagnosis allowed effective treatment. These cases highlight the need for greater awareness of MMN among physicians.

Objective:The mechanism of hypoglycorrhachia—low CSF glucose—in meningitis remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the relative contribution of CSF inflammation vs microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) in lowering CSF glucose levels.Methods:We retrospectively categorized CSF profiles into microbial and aseptic meningitis and analyzed CSF leukocyte count, glucose, and protein concentrations. We assessed the relationship between these markers using multivariate and stratified linear regression analysis for initial and repeated CSF sampling. We also calculated the receiver operating characteristics of CSF glucose and CSF-to-serum glucose ratios to presumptively diagnose microbial meningitis.Results:We found that increasing levels of CSF inflammation were associated with decreased CSF glucose levels in the microbial but not aseptic category. Moreover, elevated CSF protein levels correlated more strongly than the leukocyte count with low CSF glucose levels on initial (R2= 36%,p< 0.001) and repeated CSF sampling (R2= 46%,p< 0.001). Hypoglycorrhachia (Conclusions:The main driver of hypoglycorrhachia appears to be a combination of microbial meningitis with moderate to high degrees of CSF inflammation and proteins, suggesting that the presence of microorganisms capable of catabolizing glucose is a determinant of hypoglycorrhachia in meningitis. A major notable exception is neurosarcoidosis. Low CSF glucose and CSF-to-serum glucose ratios are useful markers for the diagnosis of microbial meningitis.

Context Chronic pain remains prevalent in HIV+ adults despite widespread antiretroviral use. Pain continues to be underrecognized and undertreated in this population. In Thailand, similar to the West, HIV care is transitioning toward chronic disease management. Despite the importance of pain management in chronic HIV, the prevalence of pain and adequacy of pain management is unknown in HIV+ adults in Thailand. Objectives This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the prevalence of chronic pain, the burden of inadequate analgesia, and risk factors for chronic pain in HIV+ adults in Thailand. Methods A total of 254 HIV+ adults were recruited from an outpatient clinic in Thailand. Interviewers obtained information on demographics, clinical data, and pain characteristics. The burden of inadequate analgesia was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory. Risk factors were identified with logistic regression analysis. Results Frequent pain was reported by 27% of participants; 22% reported chronic pain. Pain was significantly associated with education less than primary school, a positive depression screen, and the number of years on combined antiretroviral therapy. Eighty-six percent of patients with frequent pain were inadequately treated. Of 34 patients with moderate or severe pain, none received adequate analgesia. Inadequate analgesia was a significant risk factor for poorer quality of life. Conclusion Despite widespread antiretroviral use, pain remains common and undertreated in HIV+ adults in Thailand. Undertreated pain negatively impacts quality of life. It is imperative that policy makers and HIV caregivers address this treatment gap to advance the care of people living with HIV in Thailand.

Background Legionella pneumophila is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia. Central nervous system dysfunction is common, and diagnosis in the absence of pulmonary symptoms can be challenging. Here we describe an atypical clinical presentation of Legionella infection in a patient with HIV who was found to have an unusual neuroradiologic lesion that further served to obscure the diagnosis. This is the first such description in a patient with Legionellosis and HIV coinfection. Case presentation A 43 year-old HIV positive man presented to our hospital with dysarthria, fevers, headache, and altered mental status. Initial work-up revealed pneumonia and a lesion of the splenium of the corpus callosum on magnetic resonance imaging. He was subsequently diagnosed with Legionella pneumonia and treated with complete symptom resolution. Conclusions Neurologic abnormalities are frequent in Legionellosis, but the diagnosis may be difficult in the absence of overt respiratory symptoms and in the presence of HIV coinfection. A high index of suspicion and early initiation of empiric antibiotics is imperative since early treatment may help prevent long-term sequelae. Neuroimaging abnormalities, though rare, can help the physician narrow down the diagnosis and avoid unnecessary invasive testing. Future studies should aim to elucidate the as yet unknown role of neuroimaging in the diagnoses and prognostication of Legionellosis, as well as the interaction between Legionella infection and HIV.