Search

The incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has increased over recent years, particularly among young women. Partner type is believed to influence women’s STI risk. However, researchers often restrict partner type to “casual” versus “committed,” labels that can mask risk variability. Therefore, in this study, we identified and explored a range of sexual partner types in order to understand how young women’s perceived risk and condom use intentions vary by partner type. Data were obtained during six focus groups of young women (N = 25) who were recruited from a community reproductive healthcare clinic. Women described a range of monogamous and non-monogamous partner types that were distinguished based on partner regularity (i.e., whether the sexual partnership was ongoing) and personal relationship (i.e., degree of involvement outside of the sexual relationship). Women’s perceived STI risk was higher and condom use intentions stronger with new partners, particularly unfamiliar partners (i.e., “one-night stand,” “fuck boy”). Women identified potential harm from condom negotiation with all but the “friends with benefits” partners. However, the nature of this harm differed by partner type. Clinicians and researchers should consider how to support women in advocating for safer sexual behaviors across these partner types by understanding how partner regularity, degree of personal relationship, and emotional attachment differentially impact couples’ condom use decisions.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about whether there are differences in rates of sexual violence and its association with substance use based on women’s identities, specifically the intersection of their race/ethnicity and sexual orientation. METHOD: Women (N = 546; 18 to 29 years of age) recruited from a reproductive healthcare clinic reported their race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, sexual violence history and substance use. Five logistic regressions examined (a) rates of sexual violence, and (b) the strength of the associations between sexual violence and four substance use outcomes (heavy alcohol use, marijuana use, cigarette use, number of cigarettes used) based on sexual orientation. Subsequent logistic regressions examined race/ethnicity as a moderator of the associations between sexual orientation and (a) rates of sexual violence and (b) substance use. RESULTS: Most women surveyed were heterosexual (64%), and 35% of all women reported unwanted sex. Sexual minority women (SMW) reported higher rates of sexual violence and substance use than heterosexual women. Sexual violence was more strongly associated with heavy alcohol use, but not with marijuana or cigarette use, for SMW than heterosexual women. Rates of sexual violence varied based on the intersection of sexual orientation and race/ethnicity. Although SMW were more likely to report sexual violence than heterosexual women, this association was weaker for Black/Latinx women than for non-Hispanic White women (aOR = 0.39, 95%CI [0.18, 0.82]). Race/ethnicity did not moderate the strength of associations between sexual violence and substance use. CONCLUSIONS: SMW exhibit increased risk for sexual violence and substance use, and victimization was associated with heavy alcohol use. Few racial/ethnic differences emerged as a function of sexual orientation, so SMW are a group with unique needs around sexual violence experiences and substance use, regardless of race/ethnicity. Healthcare providers should be aware of the link between substance use and prior victimization when treating SMW.

BACKGROUND. This exploratory trial determined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a brief intervention (BI), supplemented with text messaging and a curated website, on alcohol use and sexual risk behavior among young women. METHODS. Young women seeking care at a reproductive health clinic were screened for alcohol misuse and sexual risk behavior. Those who screened positive and who agreed to participate (N = 48; M = 22.67 years) were randomized to either (a) a brief in-person session during which personalized feedback regarding alcohol use and sexual risking taking was provided and discussed, or (b) a control condition. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and retention rates. Acceptability was assessed with participant ratings of their intervention. Efficacy was measured using self-reported alcohol use and sexual behavior at baseline and during a 3-month follow-up. We supplemented the quantitative data with qualitative data from semi-structured interviews. RESULTS. Feasibility data indicated that 64% of eligible women agreed to participate, 74% of eligible women were enrolled, and 86% of enrolled women were retained through follow-up. Acceptability data showed that women who received the BI reported strong satisfaction with their intervention (M = 4.65 vs. 3.98 on a 5-point scale) and also reported that text messaging was helpful (M = 4.73 on a 7-point scale) and acceptable (M = 5.27 on a 7-point scale). Qualitative data provided additional support for BI feasibility and acceptability. Efficacy data showed that women in both conditions reduced alcohol use and sexual risk behavior over time; women who received the BI reduced their maximum daily alcohol intake more than controls (BI: 7.68 to 4.82 standard drinks vs. Control: 6.48 to 5.65; Wald x(2) = 4.93, p < .05). Women in the BI (Median = 2.50) reported fewer occasions of condomless sex than controls (Median = 5.00) at the follow-up, but this difference was not statistically significant (OR = 0.61, 95%CI [0.32, 1.15]). CONCLUSIONS. A brief intervention, supplemented with text messaging and a website, that targeted alcohol use and sexual behavior was feasible and acceptable to young women, and led to lower levels of alcohol misuse and sexual risk behavior.

Alcohol use and sexual behavior co-occur frequently in young women, increasing risk for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. To inform preventive interventions, we used qualitative methods to better understand how women think about the contribution of alcohol use to sexual risk-taking. Young women (N = 25; M = 22.8 years; 64% White) were recruited from a community-based reproductive health clinic to attend focus groups; a semi-structured agenda was used to investigate both a priori explanatory mechanisms as well as participant-driven explanations for the alcohol-sex association. Women reported that alcohol reduced their social anxiety, helped them to feel outgoing and confident, and lowered inhibitions and other barriers to sexual encounters (consistent with alcohol expectancies). During drinking events, women described being less concerned with risks, less discriminating regarding sexual partners, and less likely to insist on safer sex practices (consistent with alcohol myopia). These empirical findings support previous theory-based guidance for tailoring preventive programs for alcohol use and sexual risk reduction for young women.

Background To describe sexual risk behavior, alcohol (and other substance) use, and perceived health promotion needs among young adult women seeking care from an urban reproductive health care clinic in the Northeastern United States, and to examine if these needs differ by race and ethnicity. Methods Women 18–29 years old presenting for a routine medical visit were invited to participate. Of 486 eligible women, 466 (96%) agreed to participate and completed a brief survey on a tablet computer. Most of the sample (53%) identified as non-Hispanic White. One-quarter (25%) identified as Hispanic/Latina. A smaller proportion of women identified as African American (19%). Results One-third (31%) of women reported a history of sexually transmitted infection (STI), and women reported infrequent condom use with recent sexual partners. Regarding behavioral health needs, nearly three-quarters of women (72%) reported regular alcohol use, approximately one-third had used marijuana (37%) or tobacco (33%) in the last month, and 19% reported clinically significant depressive symptoms in the last two weeks. Women reported moderate-to-strong interest in receiving information about relationships and sexual health; however, the majority were not interested in information about their substance use. Hispanic and African-American women were more likely to report STI history despite reporting fewer sexual partners than non-Hispanic White women. Minority women also reported significantly less alcohol and cigarette use, but more water pipe tobacco use, and reported significantly greater interest in interventions to promote sexual health. Hispanic women also evidenced significantly elevated rates of depressive symptoms, with 26% of Hispanic women reporting a clinically significant level of depressive symptoms. Conclusions Reproductive health centers are opportune settings to address a broad range of healthcare needs, including sexual health, substance use, and mental health. These centers engage a diverse group of women, which is important given observed disparities in health outcomes based on race/ethnicity. Young women, particularly racial and ethnic minority women, report the most interest in services addressing sexual and relationship health.