Search

This case report characterizes the physiological responses to incremental cycling and determines the effects of 12 wk of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on respiratory muscle strength, exercise capacity, and dyspnea in a physically active 59-yr-old female, 4 years after a left-sided extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). On separate days, a symptom-limited incremental exercise test and a constant work rate (CWR) test at 75% of peak work rate (WR) were completed, followed by 12 wk of IMT and another CWR test. IMT consisted of two sessions of 30 repetitions twice daily for 5 days per week. Physiological and perceptual variables were measured throughout each exercise test. The participant had a total lung capacity that was 43% predicted post-EPP. A rapid and shallow breathing pattern was adopted throughout exercise, and the ratio of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide output was elevated for a given work rate. Oxygen uptake was 71% predicted and WR was 88% predicted. Following IMT, maximal inspiratory pressure improved by 36% (-27.1 cmH2O) and endurance time by 31 s, with no observable changes in any submaximal or peak cardiorespiratory variables during exercise. The intensity and unpleasantness of dyspnea increased by 2 and 3 Borg 0-10 units, respectively, at the highest equivalent submaximal exercise time achieved on both tests. Despite having undergone a significant reduction in lung volume post-EPP, the participant achieved a relatively normal peak incremental WR, which may reflect a high level of physical conditioning. This case report also demonstrates that IMT can effectively increase respiratory muscle strength several years following EPP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mechanisms linking reduced diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) to dyspnea and exercise intolerance across the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continuum are poorly understood. COPD progression generally involves both DLCO decline and worsening respiratory mechanics, and their relative contribution to dyspnea has not been determined. In a retrospective analysis of 300 COPD patients who completed symptom-limited incremental cardiopulmonary exercise tests, we tested the association between peak oxygen-uptake (VO2), DLCO, and other resting physiological measures. Then, we stratified the sample into tertiles of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and inspiratory capacity (IC) and compared dyspnea ratings, pulmonary gas exchange, and respiratory mechanics during exercise in groups with normal and low DLCO [i.e., CO was associated with peak VO2 (P = 0.006), peak work-rate (P = 0.005), and dyspnea/VO2 slope (P < 0.001) after adjustment for other independent variables (airway obstruction and hyperinflation). Within FEV1 and IC tertiles, peak VO2 and work rate were lower (P = 0.05) in low versus normal DLCO groups. Across all tertiles, low DLCO groups had higher dyspnea ratings, greater ventilatory inefficiency and arterial oxygen desaturation, and showed greater mechanical volume constraints at a lower ventilation during exercise than the normal DLCO group (all P < 0.05). After accounting for baseline resting respiratory mechanical abnormalities, DLCOCO. The higher dyspnea ratings and earlier exercise termination in low DLCO groups were linked to significantly greater pulmonary gas exchange abnormalities, higher ventilatory demand, and associated accelerated dynamic mechanical constraints. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study demonstrated that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) less than the lower limit of normal had greater pulmonary gas exchange abnormalities, which resulted in higher ventilatory demand and greater dynamic mechanical constraints at lower ventilation during exercise. This, in turn, led to greater exertional dyspnea and exercise intolerance compared with patients with normal DLCO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) report an unpleasant respiratory sensation at rest, which is further amplified by adoption of a supine position (orthopnoea). The mechanisms of this acute symptomatic deterioration are poorly understood.Sixteen patients with advanced COPD and a history of orthopnoea and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy controls underwent pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and detailed sensory-mechanical measurements including inspiratory neural drive (IND) assessed by diaphragm electromyography (EMG di ), oesophageal pressure ( P es ) and gastric pressure ( P ga ), in both sitting and supine positions.Patients had severe airflow obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ): 40±18% pred) and lung hyperinflation. Regardless of the position, patients had lower inspiratory capacity (IC) and higher IND for a given tidal volume ( V T ) ( i.e. greater neuromechanical dissociation (NMD)), higher intensity of breathing discomfort, higher minute ventilation ( V ' E ) and higher breathing frequency ( f B ) compared with controls (all p<0.05). For controls in a supine position, IC increased by 0.48 L versus sitting erect, with a small drop in V ' E , mainly due to reduced f B (all p<0.05). By contrast, IC remained unaltered in patients with COPD, but dynamic lung compliance ( C Ldyn ) decreased (p<0.05) in the supine position. Breathing discomfort, inspiratory work of breathing (WOB), inspiratory effort, IND, NMD and neuroventilatory uncoupling all increased in COPD patients in the supine position (p<0.05), but not in the healthy controls. Orthopnoea was associated with acute changes in IND (r=0.65, p=0.01), neuroventilatory uncoupling (r=0.76, p=0.001) and NMD (r=0.73, p=0.002).In COPD, onset of orthopnoea coincided with an abrupt increase in elastic loading of the inspiratory muscles in recumbency, in association with increased IND and greater NMD of the respiratory system., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A.F. Elbehairy has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Faisal has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. McIsaac has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N.J. Domnik has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K.M. Milne has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.D. James has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.A. Neder has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.E. O'Donnell has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©ERS 2021.)