Search

Aims To describe the adverse events (AEs) of recreational cannabis use in France between 2012 and 2017. Methods AEs related to recreational cannabis use, alone or in combination with alcohol and/or tobacco reported to the French Addictovigilance Network were analysed (excluding cannabidiol and synthetic cannabinoids). Results Reporting of AEs tripled between 2012 (n = 179, 6.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.4-7.2) and 2017 (n = 562, 10.1%, 95% CI = 9.3-10.9), reaching 2217 cases. They concerned mainly men (76.4%) and users aged between 18 and 34 years (18-25: 30.9%; 26-34: 26.3%, range: 12-84 years). Cannabis was mainly inhaled (71.6%) and exposure was most often chronic (64.2%). Many types of AEs were reported: psychiatric (51.2%), neurological (15.6%), cardiac (7.8%) and gastrointestinal (7.7%), including unexpected AEs (n = 34, 1.1%). The most common effect was dependence, ranging from 10.1% (95% CI = 7.9-12.3) to 20.3% (95% CI = 17.3-23.2) over the study period. Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (n = 87, 2.8%) emerged from 2015. Deaths accounted for 0.2% of all AEs (4 men and 3 women aged on average 35 years). A chronic pattern of cannabis use was reported in 4 of them (intracranial hypertension in the context of lung cancer, suicide, cerebral haematoma, neonatal death with concomitant chronic alcohol use), while in the other cases the toxicological analysis identified cannabis use (ruptured aneurysm and unknown aetiology). Conclusion This study showed a multitude of AEs related to recreational cannabis use, including unexpected AEs and deaths. It highlights the problem of dependence and the emergence of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related cytopenias have been poorly described. This study aimed to further characterize ICI-related cytopenias, using the French pharmacovigilance database. All grade ≥ 2 hematological adverse drug reactions involving at least one ICI coded as suspected or interacting drug according to the World Health Organization criteria and reported up to 31 March 2022, were extracted from the French pharmacovigilance database. Patients were included if they experienced ICI-related grade ≥ 2 cytopenia. We included 68 patients (75 ICI-related cytopenias). Sixty-three percent were male, and the median age was 63.0 years. Seven patients (10.3%) had a previous history of autoimmune disease. Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) were the most frequently reported (50.7% and 25.3%, respectively). The median time to onset of ICI-related cytopenias was 2 months. Nearly half were grade ≥ 4, and three patients died from bleeding complications of refractory ITP and from thromboembolic disease with active AIHA. Out of 61 evaluable responses, complete or partial remission was observed after conventional treatment in 72.1% of ICI-related cytopenias. Among the 10 patients with ICI resumption after grade ≥ 2 ICI-related cytopenia, three relapsed. ICI-related cytopenias are rare but potentially life-threatening. Further studies are needed to identify risk factors of ICI-related cytopenias.

Background: The French Universal Health Cover (CMU) aims to compensate for inequalities between precarious and non-precarious populations, enabling the former to access to free healthcare. These measures rely on the principle that precarious populations&rsquo, health improves if healthcare is free. We designed a study to examine whether CMU fails to compensate for inequalities in reimbursed drugs prescriptions in precarious populations. Material and method: This retrospective pharmaco-epidemiological study compared the Defined Daily Dose relative to different reimbursed drugs prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) to precarious and non-precarious patients in France in 2015. Data were analysed using Mann&ndash, Whitney tests. Findings: 6 out of 20 molecules were significantly under-reimbursed in precarious populations. 2 were over-reimbursed. The 12 remaining molecules did not differ between groups. Interpretation: The under-reimbursement of atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, tamsulosine and timolol reflects well-documented epidemiological differences between these populations. In contrast, the equal reimbursement of amoxicillin, pyostacine, ivermectin, salbutamol and tiopropium is likely an effect of lack of compensation for inequalities. Precarious patients are more affected by diseases that these molecules target (e.g., chronic bronchitis, bacterial pneumonia, cutaneous infections). This could also be the case for the equal and under-reimbursement of insulin glargine and metformin (targeting diabetes), respectively, although this has to be considered with caution. In conclusion, the French free healthcare cover does not fail to compensate for all but only for some selective inequalities in access to reimbursed drugs prescriptions. These results are discussed with respect to the interaction of the doctor&ndash, patient relationship and the holistic nature of primary care, potentially triggering burnout and empathy decrease and negatively impacting the quality of care in precarious populations.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for several types of cancer due to their superiority in terms of survival benefits in first- and second-line treatments compared to conventional therapies, and they present a better safety profile (lower absolute number of grade 1–5 adverse events), especially if used in monotherapy. However, the pattern of ICI-related adverse events is totally different, as they are characterized by the development of specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that are unique in terms of the organs involved, onset patterns, and severity. The decision to resume ICI treatment after its interruption due to irAEs is challenged by the need for tumor control versus the risk of occurrence of the same or different irAEs. Studies that specifically assess this point remain scarce, heterogenous and mostly based on small samples of patients or focused only on the recurrence rate of the same irAE after ICI resumption. Moreover, patients with grade ≥3 irAEs were excluded from many of these studies. Herein, we provide a narrative review on the field of safety of ICI resumption after interruption due to irAE(s).

International audience; INTRODUCTION: In 2017, concerns regarding Adverse Events (AEs) associated with levonorgestrel Intra-Uterine Device Mirena(R) were largely echoed in medias in France. This resulted in a tremendous reporting of AEs to Pharmacovigilance Centres. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the reporting of AEs regarding Mirena(R) in France and to study the impact of media coverage on this reporting. METHODS: All cases reports involving Mirena(R) recorded in the French national pharmacovigilance database from marketing (21/07/1995) until 04/08/2017 were extracted. To allow studying the influence of mediatisation, reports were described separately for the periods preceding and following the observed media coverage peak (15/05/2017). RESULTS: Overall, 3,224 reports were considered, 510 (15.8%) recorded before the media coverage peak, and 2,714 (84.2%) after. Before the peak, 76.5% of reports originated from health professionals; median time-to-report was of 5.5 months (IQR: 1.7-18.6), and median number of AEs per report of 1 (min-max: 1-17). After the peak, 98.6% originated from patients; median time-to-report was 21 months (IQR: 8.1-45.5), and median number of AEs per report was 6 (min-max: 1-37). After the peak, most reports mentioned anxio-depressive disorders (38.8% vs 10.6% before) or sexual disorders (47.3% vs 6.9%). Other emphasized AEs were weight increase (42.3% vs 10.2%) and pain (gastrointestinal, 19.1% vs 3.5%; musculoskeletal, 22.2% vs 4.5%). CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the importance of mediatisation impact on spontaneous reporting with changes concerning amounts of reports, type of reporter, and type of reported AEs. For Mirena(R), this led to generate signals regarding anxio-depressive and sexual disorders.

International audience; AIMS: Pharmaco-epidemiological surveys enable the frequency of serious adverse effects-and also the determining factors of their occurrence and seriousness-to be quantified. Few studies systematically gathering post-chemotherapy adverse effects data have been conducted. The objective was to assess the incidence of post-chemotherapy serious adverse effects on the basis of cancer registry data.METHODS: The population was composed of new invasive cancer cases, with the exception of haematopoietic tumours and cutaneous carcinomas. These cancers were identified in 2012 among patients living at the time of diagnosis in a region covered by a general cancer registry and by a French regional pharmacovigilance centre, and treated with neo-adjuvant and/or adjuvant first-intention chemotherapy, followed or not by radiotherapy. The study was based on a sample of 1000 patients from the registry, followed by the collection of serious adverse effects and the required information to constitute a pharmacovigilance file.RESULTS: Chemotherapy was associated with a particularly high incidence of serious adverse effects, affecting 44.5% (41.4-47.5%) of the patients. The highest incidence rates were observed when patients were exposed to topo-isomerase II inhibitors such as etoposide and bleomycin (69.2%), vinca-alkaloids (66.7%), topo-isomerase I inhibitors (54.5%) and platinum derivatives (52.0%). The clinical context was also linked to incidence, especially in case of metastases (53.3%) and comorbidities (51.3%). Substantial differences were found according to localisation, with a particularly high incidence in bronchial-pulmonary cancers (59.0%).CONCLUSION: The high overall incidence rate of serious adverse effects should motivate a reinforcement of information about drug toxicities and improve knowledge by drawing on patient reporting.