Search

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the few cancers for which locoregional treatments (LRTs) are included in international guidelines and are considered as a valid alternative to conventional surgery. According to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification, percutaneous treatments such as percutaneous ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation are the therapy of choice among curative treatments in patients categorized as very early and early stage, while transcatheter arterial chemoembolization is considered the better option for intermediate stage HCC. A precise assessment of treatment efficacy and surveillance is essential to optimize survival rate, whereas residual tumor requires additional treatment. Imaging modalities play a key role in this task. Currently, contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging are considered the standard imaging modalities for this purpose. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), using second generation contrast agents, plays an increasingly important role in detecting residual disease after LRTs. CEUS is a straightforward to perform, repeatable and cost-effective imaging modality for patients with renal failure or iodine allergies. Due to the ability to focus on single regions, CEUS can also provide high temporal resolution. Moreover, several studies have reported the same or better diagnostic accuracy as contrast-enhanced computed tomography for assessing tumor vascularity 1 mo after LRTs, and recently three-dimensional (3D)-CEUS has been reported as a promising technique to improve the evaluation of tumor response to therapy. Furthermore, CEUS could be used early after procedures in monitoring HCC treatments, but nowadays this indication is still debated, and data from literature are conflicting, especially after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization procedure.

The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB). The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications.The 2012 guideline requires updating as previously the differences of the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as well as the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective.These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCA) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCA in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an imaging modality applied in a broad field of medical specialties for diagnostic uses, guidance during biopsy procedures and ablation therapies and sonoporation therapy. Appropriate training and assessment of theoretical and practical competencies are recommended before practicing CEUS, but no validated assessment tools exist. This study was aimed at developing a theoretical multiple-choice question-based test for core CEUS competencies and gathering validity evidence for the test. An expert team developed the test via a Delphi process. The test was administered to medical doctors with varying CEUS experience, and the results were used to evaluate test items, internal-consistency reliability, ability to distinguish between different proficiency levels and to establish a pass/fail score. Validity evidence was gathered according to Messick's framework. The final test with 47 test items could distinguish between operators with and without CEUS experience with acceptable reliability. The pass/fail score led to considerable risk of false positives and negatives. The test may be used as an entry test before learning practical CEUS competencies but is not recommended for certification purposes because of the risk of false positives and negatives. publishedVersion

The updated version of the EFSUMB guidelines on the application of non-hepatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) deals with the use of microbubble ultrasound contrast outside the liver in the many established and emerging applications.Die aktualisierte Version der EFSUMB-Leitlinien für die Anwendung von nicht-hepatischem kontrastverstärktem Ultraschall (CEUS) befasst sich mit der Verwendung von Mikrobläschen Ultraschall-Kontrastmitteln außerhalb der Leber in zahlreichen etablierten und neu entstehenden Einsatzbereichen.

This review focuses on the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with SonoVue (Bracco Imaging) for the diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs), guidance during ablative treatment, and follow-up of liver tumors. Multicenter trials have shown that the performance of CEUS for the characterization of FLLs is similar to that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. CEUS with SonoVue has been effectively used for guiding the percutaneous treatment of malignant liver tumors that are invisible or poorly visualized in traditional gray-scale ultrasonography. Postprocedural CEUS may be used to detect and retreat residual viable tissue in the same ablative session. The use of CEUS for the assessment of diffuse liver disease is also discussed.

To retrospectively characterize the prevalence and impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a guidance technique for the biopsy of liver target lesions (LTLs) at six interventional ultrasound centers. The six participating centers retrospectively selected all patients in whom biopsy needles were positioned in LTLs during CEUS. The prevalence of CEUS-guided biopsies at each center between 2005 and 2016, contrast agent consumption, procedure indications, diagnostic yield and complications were assessed. Informed consent was obtained for all patients. CEUS-guided biopsy of LTLs was carried out in 103 patients (68 M/35 F, median age: 69 yrs) with 103 liver target lesions (median size: 20 mm) using cutting needles (18 - 20 g) in 94 cases (91.2 %). CEUS-guided biopsy represented 2.6 % (range: 0.8 - 7.7 %) of 3818 biopsies on LTLs carried out at the participating centers. Indications to CEUS-guided biopsy were: a target lesion not visible on non-enhanced US (27.2 %), improvement of conspicuity of the target (33 %), choice of non-necrotic area inside the target (39.8 %). 26 patients (25.2 %) had a previously non-diagnostic cyto-histological exam. The diagnostic accuracy of the technique was 99 %. No major complications followed infusion of contrast agent or biopsy performance. The indications for CEUS-guided biopsy for LTLs are limited, but CEUS can be useful in challenging clinical scenarios, e. g. poorly visualized or invisible lesions or sampling of non-necrotic areas in the target lesions. There is also a potential advantage in using CEUS to guide repeat biopsies after unsuccessful sampling performed using the standard ultrasound technique.ZIEL: Retrospektive Charakterisierung der Prävalenz und der Bedeutung des kontrastverstärkten Ultraschalls (CEUS) als Führungstechnik bei der Biopsie von Leber-Zielläsionen (LTL) in sechs interventionellen Ultraschallzentren. Die sechs teilnehmenden Zentren wählten retrospektiv alle Patienten aus, bei denen Biopsienadeln in den LTLs während des CEUS positioniert waren. Die Häufigkeit der CEUS-gestützten Biopsien an jedem Zentrum zwischen 2005 und 2016, der Kontrastmittelverbrauch, die Indikationen für den Eingriff, der diagnostische Gewinn und Komplikationen wurden beurteilt. Eine Einverständniserklärung wurde für alle Patienten eingeholt. Eine CEUS-gestützte Biopsie der LTL wurde bei 103 Patienten (68 M / 35 F, medianes Alter: 69 Jahre) mit 103 Leber-Zielläsionen (mediane Größe: 20 mm) durchgeführt, wobei in 94 Fällen (91,2 %) Biopsienadeln (18 – 20 g) zum Einsatz kamen. Die CEUS-gestützte Biopsie betrug 2,6 % (Bereich: 0,8 – 7,7 %) der 3818 LTL-Biopsien, die in den teilnehmenden Zentren durchgeführt wurden. Indikationen für eine CEUS-gestützte Biopsie waren: Eine im konventionellen US nicht sichtbare Zielläsion (27,2 %), eine Verbesserung der Auffälligkeit des Ziels (33 %), die Auswahl eines nicht-nekrotischen Bereichs im Ziel (39,8 %). Bei 26 Patienten (25,2 %) wurde zuvor eine nicht-diagnostische zytologische Untersuchung durchgeführt. Die diagnostische Genauigkeit der Methode betrug 99 %. Es traten keine größeren Komplikationen nach Infusion des Kontrastmittels oder bei Durchführung der Biopsie auf. Die Indikationen für die CEUS-gestützte Biopsie bei LTLs sind begrenzt, aber CEUS kann in schwierigen klinischen Szenarien nützlich sein, zum Beispiel bei schlecht darzustellenden oder unsichtbaren Läsionen oder bei Probenentnahme in nicht-nekrotischen Bereichen der Zielläsionen. Einen möglichen Nutzen besteht für den Einsatz von CEUS bei der Führung von Wiederholungsbiopsien, wenn die Probennahme bei Anwendung der Standard-Ultraschalltechnik erfolglos war.

The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications. The 2012 guideline requires updating as, previously, the differences in the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective. These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCAs in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.

Thermal ablation is increasingly being utilised in the treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumours, both as curative therapy and as a bridge to transplantation. Recent advances in high-powered microwave ablation systems have allowed physicians to realise the theoretical heating advantages of microwave energy compared to other ablation modalities. As a result there is a growing body of literature detailing the effects of microwave energy on tissue heating, as well as its effect on clinical outcomes. This article will discuss the relevant physics, review current clinical outcomes and then describe the current techniques used to optimise patient care when using microwave ablation systems.

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of a microwave ablation (MWA) apparatus in preclinical and clinical settings.The same commercial 2.45 GHz MWA apparatus was used throughout this study. In total 108 ablations at powers ranging from 20 to 130 W and lasting from 3 to 30 min were obtained on ex vivo bovine liver; 28 ablations at 60 W, 80 W and 100 W lasting 5 and 10 min were then obtained in an in vivo swine model. Finally, 32 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and 19 liver metastases in 46 patients were treated percutaneously by administering 60 W for either 5 or 10 min. The treatment outcome was characterised in terms of maximum longitudinal and transversal axis of the induced ablation zone.Ex vivo ablation volumes increased linearly with deposited energy (rFor the selected MW ablation device, ex vivo data on bovine liver was more predictive of the actual clinical performance on liver malignancies than an in vivo porcine model. Equivalent MW treatments yielded a significantly different response for HCC and metastases at higher deposited energy, suggesting that outcomes are not only device-specific but must also be characterised on a tissue-by-tissue basis.

In 2007 the Italian National Institute of Health issued Guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging techniques in the detection and the characterization of focal liver lesions. Since the publication of these guidelines in 2008, several studies relating to this topic have been published. Thus, we felt the need to assess whether interval research and new advancements in diagnostic imaging have yielded new evidence that should modify the recommendations that were previously issued. The literature search confirmed the appropriateness of the current guidelines. Although most modalities did not show substantial changes, interval introduction of DW-MRI is a valuable technique with a high diagnostic accuracy in the detection and characterization of FLLs, and its sensitivity is higher when combined with MRI. Abbreviations: AASLD: American Association for the Study of Liver Disease; CE-IOUS: contrast-enhanced intraoperative US; CEUS: contrast-enhanced ultrasound; CRLM: colorectal liver metastasis; DW-MRI: diffusion weighted MRI; EOB-MRI: gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid MRI; FLLs: focal liver lesions; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; LR+: positive likelihood ratio; LR-: negative likelihood ratio; NPV: negative predictive value; PET: positron emission tomography; PPV: positive predictive value; RF: radiofrequency; TACE: transarterial chemoembolization

The updated version of the EFSUMB guidelines on the application of non-hepatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) deals with the use of microbubble ultrasound contrast outside the liver in the many established and emerging applications.Die aktualisierte Version der EFSUMB-Leitlinien für die Anwendung von nicht-hepatischem kontrastverstärktem Ultraschall (CEUS) befasst sich mit der Verwendung von Mikrobläschen Ultraschall-Kontrastmitteln außerhalb der Leber in zahlreichen etablierten und neu entstehenden Einsatzbereichen.

Objective: We described an impressive cluster of hepatitis C in a single family. Of nine members of the family, six - the mother and five daughters - were affected by chronic hepatitis, hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b, of which two were co-infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Sharing a non-disposable injection equipment for intramuscular medical care was the most likely route of contagion. Twenty years after the first observation, we performed a follow up of this family. Methods: The clinical history was updated, and the members of the family underwent a clinical evaluation, extensive liver laboratory tests, and whole serology for hepatitis C and B. Protein chain reaction for HCV RNA was performed when indicated. The eight spouses of the offspring and their eight children underwent the same evaluation. Results: The main findings of this study are the favourable outcome of the two members of the family mono-infected by HCV, treated with peginterferon and ribavirin (sustained response and free of liver disease), in contrast with the ominous outcome of the two members co-infected with HCV and HBV, who evolved to decompensated cirrhosis, with hepatocellular carcinoma in one case, ultimately leading to death. A further feature is the absence of transmission of HCV to the spouses and to the third generation of children of this family, consistent with the assumption that sexual and vertical transmission is unlikely. Conclusions: A thorough epidemiological investigation of the two first generations of this family, the study of their spouses and children, and the twenty years of follow up provided a strong presumption that the infection with HCV had occurred within this family through the promiscuous use of the same inadequately sterilized glass syringe for intramuscular therapies, as was a common practice during the fifties and sixties worldwide and still is in some part of the world.

Liver metastases often exhibit a hypervascular halo during the arterial phase of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). This finding has no correlates on baseline gray-scale imaging, and it has never been characterized. The aim of this study was to identify the features of this halo and determine whether it should be included in the ablation volume during thermal ablation procedures.We prospectively enrolled 25 patients referred to our department for thermal ablation of liver metastases. Before treatment all patients underwent CEUS, and the maximum diameter of the metastatic lesion was measured before administration of the ultrasound contrast agent and during the arterial and portal venous phases of the contrast contrast-enhanced study. Maximum diameters in the different vascular phases were compared with the Turkey-Kramer test. Two biopsies were obtained from each lesion with a 21-gauge needle: 1) one from the center of the metastasis to confirm the diagnosis and 2) one from the hypervascular peripheral halo identified in the arterial phase at CEUS.The mean (±standard deviation) maximum lesion diameter was 2.67 ± 1.2 cm before contrast agent injection, 3.50 ± 1.4 cm during the arterial phase, and 2.71 ± 1.2 cm during the venous phase. The difference between maximum diameters measured before contrast enhancement and in the arterial phase was highly significant (mean: 0.84 ± 0.45 cm, p 0.0001). Histological examination of halo specimens revealed inflammatory infiltrates with no evidence of tumor infiltration in 24/25 (96%) cases and normal hepatic parenchymal tissue in the 25th specimen.The hypervascular halo surrounding liver metastases during the arterial phase of CEUS represents a chronic inflammatory infiltrate, not tumor infiltration. However, since chronic inflammation appears to promote neovascularization and the production of tumoral growth factors, it seems wise to include the hypervascular halo in the intended-to-treat volume when planning the ablation procedure.Sommario INTRODUZIONE: All’ecografia con Mezzo di Contrasto (CEUS) dei tumori secondari epatici si evidenzia spesso un alone periferico ipervascolare, che non ha corrispondenza sull’immagine ecografica di base e non è ancora stato caratterizzato istologicamente. Lo scopo dello studio è di caratterizzare tale alone al fine di determinare se sia necessario includerlo nel volume di necrosi pianificato. MATERIALI E METODI: Questo studio prospettico ha incluso 25 pazienti inviati per terapia termo-ablativa di tumori secondari epatici. Prima del trattamento tutti i pazienti sono stati sottoposti a CEUS. Il diametro maggiore della lesione è stato determinato: pre-contrasto, durante la fase arteriosa e durante la fase venosa portale. I diametri delle lesioni pre e post-contrasto sono stati confrontati mediante il test di Turkey–Kramer. Due campioni bioptici sono stati prelevati con ago 21-gauge e analizzati istologicamente: 1) uno dalla zona centrale del tumore e 2) uno dall’alone periferico ipervascolare, identificato alla CEUS solamente nella fase arteriosa. RISULTATI: Il diametro massimo medio delle lesioni è risultato (±deviazione standard): 2,67 ± 1,2 cm pre-contrasto; 3,50 ± 1,4 cm in fase arteriosa; 2,71 ± 1,2 cm in fase venosa. La differenza media tra il diametro massimo pre-contrasto e in fase arteriosa è risultata di 0,84 ± 0,45cm (p0,0001). All’esame istologico, 24/25 campioni (96%) hanno dimostrato flogosi senza evidenza di tumore microscopico. DISCUSSIONE: L’alone ipervascolare periferico è costituito da infiltrato infiammatorio, non da tessuto tumorale. Esistono evidenze in letteratura che l’infiammazione cronica promuova la neovascolarizzazione e la produzione di fattori di crescita per le cellule neoplastiche. Sembra quindi opportuno includere completamente l’alone ipervascolare periferico evidente alla CEUS nel volume di termo-ablazione.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the local control and intermediate- and long-term survival of patients with liver metastases from breast cancer who have undergone percutaneous ultrasonography (US)-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the hospital ethics committee, and all patients provided written informed consent. RF ablation was used to treat 87 breast cancer liver metastases (mean diameter, 2.5 cm) in 52 female patients (median age, 55 years). Inclusion criteria were as follows: fewer than five tumors, maximum tumor diameter of 5 cm or smaller, and disease either confined to the liver or stable with medical therapy. Forty-five (90%) of 50 patients had previously undergone chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or both, and had no response or an incomplete response to the treatment. Contrast material-enhanced computed tomography and US were performed to evaluate complications and technical success and to assess for local tumor progression during follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess survival, and results were compared between groups with a log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was used to assess independent prognostic factors that affected survival. RESULTS: Complete tumor necrosis was achieved in 97% of tumors. Two (4%) minor complications occurred. Median time to follow-up from diagnosis of liver metastasis and from RF ablation was 37.2 and 19.1 months, respectively. Local tumor progression occurred in 25% of patients. New intrahepatic metastases developed in 53% of patients. From the time of first RF ablation, overall median survival time and 5-year survival rate were 29.9 months and 27%, respectively. From the time the first liver metastasis was diagnosed, overall median survival time was 42 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 32%. Patients with tumors 2.5 cm in diameter or larger had a worse prognosis (hazard ratio, 2.1) than did patients with tumors smaller than 2.5 cm in diameter. CONCLUSION: Survival rates in selected patients with breast cancer liver metastases treated with RF ablation are comparable to those reported in the literature that were achieved with surgery or laser ablation

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of contrast-enhanced pulse inversion harmonic imaging with contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography and helical CT to determine incomplete local treatment after radiofrequency ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Thirty-five consecutive patients (24 men and 11 women; mean age, 64 years) with 43 hepatocellular carcinomas (3.6 +/- 1.1 cm) were treated using internally cooled radiofrequency ablation therapy. Therapeutic response was evaluated at 4 months with dual-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT, conventional power Doppler Sonography, and pulse inversion harmonic imaging using a sonographic contrast agent (SH-508). CT and sonographic studies were reviewed separately in random order by four radiologists at different consensus conferences. Sensitivity and specificity of the sonographic methods were determined using CT as a gold standard and results were compared using the McNemar test.CT examinations identified residual tumor in 12 lesions (27.9%). Although conventional contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography identified residual viable tumor foci in four incompletely treated lesions (9.3%), contrast-enhanced pulse inversion harmonic imaging identified residual tumoral enhancement in 10 lesions (23.3%). Thus, the sensitivity of pulse inversion harmonic imaging (83.3%) was significantly greater (p0.05) for detecting residual nonablated tumor compared with conventional contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography.Our study suggests that contrast-enhanced pulse inversion harmonic imaging may enable the detection of residual nonablated tumor in more cases than contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography and may ultimately prove to be a useful adjunct for percutaneous ablation therapies. Nevertheless, contrast-enhanced axial imaging (CT or MR imaging) is currently the most sensitive test for managing thermal ablation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Image-guided tumor ablation has become a well-established hallmark of local cancer therapy. The breadth of options available in this growing field increases the need for standardization of terminology and reporting criteria to facilitate effective communication of ideas and appropriate comparison among treatments that use different technologies, such as chemical (eg, ethanol or acetic acid) ablation, thermal therapies (eg, radiofrequency, laser, microwave, focused ultrasound, and cryoablation) and newer ablative modalities such as irreversible electroporation. This updated consensus document provides a framework that will facilitate the clearest communication among investigators regarding ablative technologies. An appropriate vehicle is proposed for reporting the various aspects of image-guided ablation therapy including classification of therapies, procedure terms, descriptors of imaging guidance, and terminology for imaging and pathologic findings. Methods are addressed for standardizing reporting of technique, follow-up, complications, and clinical results. As noted in the original document from 2003, adherence to the recommendations will improve the precision of communications in this field, leading to more accurate comparison of technologies and results, and ultimately to improved patient outcomes. Online supplemental material is available for this article .

To retrospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of immediate post-procedural CEUS, 24-h CEUS, and 24-h CT in verifying the effectiveness of thermal ablation of liver tumors ablation, using the combined results of 3-month post-procedure CEUS and MDCT as the reference standard.From our database, we selected patients who had immediate post-procedural CEUS and 24-h CEUS and MDCT examinations after undergoing thermal ablation of a liver tumor between January 2009 and March 2010. The study population consisted of 53 subjects and 55 tumors (44 HCC and 11 metastasis) were evaluated. Thirty-seven tumors were treated with radiofrequency and 18 with microwave ablation. Post-procedural CEUS, 24-h CEUS and MDCT, and 3-month follow-up CEUS and MDCT images were blindly reviewed by two radiologists, who measured the size of the ablation area on the post-procedural and 24-h studies. They also evaluated the ability of each of these three index tests to predict the outcome (residual tumor vs. no residual tumor) using imaging studies done at the 3-month follow-up as the reference standard.Mean tumor diameter on preablation CEUS (the day before treatment) was 20 ± 9 mm. Mean diameter of the necrotic area was 29 ± 9 mm on post-procedural CEUS, 34 ± 11 mm on 24-h CEUS, and 36 ± 11 mm on 24-h MDCT. Diameters of the necrotic area (mean and maximum) on post-procedural CEUS were significantly smaller than those measured on 24-h CEUS or 24-h MDCT, which were not significantly different. For predicting the presence of residual tumor at the 3-month follow-up, post-procedural CEUS, 24-h CEUS, and 24-h MDCT displayed sensitivity of 33%, 33%, and 42%; specificity of 92%, 97%, and 97%; negative predictive value of 84%, 85%, and 83%. The accuracy parameters of these three imaging modalities were not significantly different from one another.In patients undergoing thermal ablation for liver tumors, the immediate post-procedural CEUS seems comparable to 24-h CEUS and MDCT in terms of detecting residual disease.Determinare retrospettivamente l’accuratezza diagnostica nella valutazione di efficacia delle ablazioni di tumori epatici della CEUS eseguita al termine della procedura ablativa, della CEUS e della la tomografia computerizzata multi-detettore (TCMD) eseguite a 24 ore, utilizzando la CEUS e TCMD a 3 mesi di follow-up come standard di riferimento.Abbiamo selezionato dal nostro data base i pazienti sottoposti a CEUS subito dopo una procedura di ablazione e a CEUS e TCMD dopo 24 ore tra gennaio 2009 e marzo 2010. Il campione era composto da 53 soggetti in cui abbiamo valutato 55 lesioni (44 HCC e 11 metastasi). Trentasette lesioni sono state trattate con ablazione a radiofrequenza, 18 mediante microonde. La CEUS post-trattamento, la CEUS e la TCMD eseguite a 24 ore, e la CEUS e la TCMD eseguite a tre mesi di follow-up sono state rivalutate in cieco da due radiologi. Abbiamo confrontato tra loro le dimensioni della termoablazione misurate alla CEUS post-procedura, alla CEUS e alla TCMD eseguite a 24 ore. Abbiamo calcolato l’accuratezza diagnostica della CEUS post-procedura, della CEUS e della TCMD a 24 ore valutando la capacità di ogni metodica nel rilevare il tessuto vitale residuo utilizzando come standard di riferimento il follow-up a 3 mesi (TCMD e CEUS combinate).Il diametro medio del tumore alla CEUS il giorno prima del trattamento era di 20 ± 9 mm. Il diametro medio della necrosi ottenuta è di: 29 ± 9 mm alla CEUS post-trattamento, 34 ± 11 mm alla CEUS a 24 ore e 36 ± 11 mm alla TCMD a 24 ore. Il diametro medio ed il diametro massimo dell’area di necrosi misurati alla CEUS post-trattamento rispetto alla CEUS o alla TCMD eseguite a 24 ore sono risultati significativamente inferiori. La differenza tra le dimensioni dell’area di necrosi misurate alla CEUS e alla TCMD a 24 ore non è significativa. La CEUS post-trattamento, la CEUS a 24 ore e la TCMD a 24 ore hanno dimostrato i seguenti parametri di accuratezza diagnostica nell’individuare il tumore residuo rispetto al follow-up: sensibilità, 33%, 33%, 42%; specificità, 92%, 97%, 97%; valore predittivo negativo 84%, 85% and 83%. La differenza tra i parametri di accuratezza diagnostica delle tre metodiche non è risultata significativa.L’accuratezza diagnostica della CEUS post-trattamento nell'individuare tessuto tumorale residuo dopo ablazione di tumori epatici è comparabile a quella della CEUS e della TCMD a 24 ore.

To develop guidelines for the noninvasive imaging assessment of focal liver lesions comparing different imaging modalities focused on (i) evaluating the imaging techniques in terms of (a) diagnostic accuracy; (b) role in the management of oncologic patients; (c) follow-up of benign lesions; and (ii) developing standard procedure for their use in patients with focal liver lesions that require targeted diagnostic characterization.An explicit search strategy was used to conduct a systematic review of the literature in the English language from January 2000 to October 2007; the search covered PubMed, Embase, Pascal, SciSearch, and Cochrane Library databases. A panel of experts evaluated the selected studies and conveyed their view.The online search yielded 4960 titles and abstracts from which 176 studies were considered suitable for the final adherence-to-guidelines topic evaluation. An evidence grading system was not used as the guideline topic and the heterogeneity of the collected data did not fit with the currently used hierarchy of evidence. A panel of experts formulated several recommendations with grade and level which were expressed narratively and nonschematically.The recommendations reported in the study are based on an extensive literature evaluation and were developed by considering the appropriateness of the choice of the imaging techniques while noninvasively detecting and characterizing focal liver lesions.

We evaluated the ability of one-month follow-up contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with second-generation contrast agent in monitoring radio frequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatments of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). One-hundred forty-eight HCCs were studied using CEUS: 110 nodules were treated with RFA [41/110 RFA were performed using a pretreatment and an immediate postablation evaluation using CEUS (group 1); 69/110 using only US guidance (group 2)] and 38 nodules treated with TACE. For statistical analysis, McNemar test was used. Overall complete response was observed in 107/148 nodules (92/110 treated with RFA and 15/38 with TACE). A better rate of complete response was found in group 1 compared to group 2 (92.7% vs. 78.3%). In RFA treatment, CEUS showed a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 100% (diagnostic accuracy of 97%) using MDCT as reference standard with no statistical difference (p > 0.05). CEUS detected all cases of incomplete response in HCC treated with TACE using angiography as reference standard (diagnostic accuracy 100%). We recommend assessing residual intratumoral flow on CEUS during RFA procedure to determine the necessity of immediate additional treatment. In case of positive CEUS results, HCC treated with TACE should be considered still viable.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess, with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI as the reference imaging technique, the diagnostic performance of low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography in detecting local tumor progression after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors. Materials AND METHODS. Twenty-nine patients with 30 renal tumors (18 men, 11 women; mean age, 73 years; range, 53–83 years) underwent percutaneous radiofrequency ablation at a single center between March 1998 and January 2007. The imaging follow-up schedule was both contrast-enhanced sonography and CT or MRI 4 months after completion of treatment and every 4 months for the first year. Thereafter, the follow-up schedule was contrast-enhanced sonography every 4 months with CT or MRI every 8 months. The chi square test with Yates correction was used to evaluate positive and negative predictive values and accuracy. RESULTS. One patient was scheduled to undergo surgical resection, and another patient was lost to follow-up. Twenty-seven patients with 28 renal tumors participated in follow-up. The concordance between contrast-enhanced sonographic and CT or MRI findings was 100% for 27 of 28 tumors (96.4%) that had a hypervascular pattern before treatment. In the case of the tumor that was hypovascular at imaging performed before percutaneous radiofrequency ablation, local tumor progression was missed at contrast-enhanced sonography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of contrast-enhanced sonography were 96.6%, 100%, 100%, 95.8%, and 98.1%. CONCLUSION. Contrast-enhanced sonography is an effective alternative to CT and MRI in the follow-up of renal tumors managed with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation.