1. In vivo variation in same-day estimates of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 binding using [ 11 C]ABP688 and [ 18 F]FPEB.
- Author
-
DeLorenzo C, Gallezot JD, Gardus J, Yang J, Planeta B, Nabulsi N, Ogden RT, Labaree DC, Huang YH, Mann JJ, Gasparini F, Lin X, Javitch JA, Parsey RV, Carson RE, and Esterlis I
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Healthy Volunteers, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Molecular Imaging, Protein Binding, Radiopharmaceuticals, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Brain diagnostic imaging, Brain metabolism, Nitriles pharmacology, Oximes pharmacology, Positron-Emission Tomography methods, Pyridines pharmacology, Receptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5 metabolism
- Abstract
Positron emission tomography tracers [
11 C]ABP688 and [18 F]FPEB target the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 providing quantification of the brain glutamatergic system in vivo. Previous [11 C]ABP688 positron emission tomography human test-retest studies indicate that, when performed on the same day, significant binding increases are observed; however, little deviation is reported when scans are >7 days apart. Due to the small cohorts examined previously (eight and five males, respectively), we aimed to replicate the same-day test-retest studies in a larger cohort including both males and females. Results confirmed large within-subject binding differences (ranging from -23% to 108%), suggesting that measurements are greatly affected by study design. We further investigated whether this phenomenon was specific to [11 C]ABP688. Using [18 F]FPEB and methodology that accounts for residual radioactivity from the test scan, four subjects were scanned twice on the same day. In these subjects, binding estimates increased between 5% and 39% between scans. Consistent with [11 C]ABP688, mean absolute test-retest variability was previously reported as <12% when scans were >21 days apart. This replication study and pilot extension to [18 F]FPEB suggest that observed within-day binding variation may be due to characteristics of mGluR5; for example, diurnal variation in mGluR5 may affect measurement of this receptor.- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF