1. Potential roles of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in acute phase care of patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death: A single-center Japanese experience
- Author
-
Fumie Nishizaki, Hirofumi Tomita, Takumi Higuma, Taihei Itoh, Daisuke Horiuchi, Masaomi Kimura, Ken Okumura, Kei Izumiyama, Yuichi Tsushima, Hiroaki Yokoyama, Yoshihiro Shoji, Takashi Yokota, Shingo Sasaki, Masahiro Yamada, Takahiko Kinjo, Maiko Seno, and Yuji Ishida
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias ,Electric Countershock ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Single Center ,Ventricular Function, Left ,Sudden cardiac death ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Japan ,Tachycardia ,Internal medicine ,Secondary Prevention ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Clinical efficacy ,Aged ,business.industry ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Icd implantation ,Death, Sudden, Cardiac ,Shock (circulatory) ,Ventricular Fibrillation ,Ventricular fibrillation ,Tachycardia, Ventricular ,Cardiology ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Wearable cardioverter defibrillator ,Defibrillators - Abstract
Background The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) has been expected to play a role as an effective bridge therapy to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in patients at high risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VA). Although WCD has been available since April 2014 in Japan, its usefulness remains unclear. Methods and results During the early period after hospitalization, patients at high risk of VA after excluding some elderly patients were prescribed WCD. The consecutive 50 patients with WCD use (median age 56 years, 38 for secondary prevention) were studied. We analyzed clinical efficacy and safety of WCD, and examined its potential roles. Of the 50 patients, 38 used WCD only during hospitalization. During WCD use [median 16 (IQR 8–33) days], all patients wore WCD for 98% of a day regardless of in or out-of-hospital use. Sustained VA was detected in 4 patients (8%; for primary prevention in 1) with 7 episodes, and 6 of 7 episodes required shock therapy. Of the 6 shock therapies, 4 were for sustained ventricular tachycardia with the median rate of 236 beats/min (IQR 203–250), and the other 2 for ventricular fibrillation. Subsequently, only 27 patients (54%) of all underwent ICD implantation following the WCD use, because of reduced risk of VA after optimal pharmacological therapy or improvement in the left ventricular function. Conclusions The WCD use for the acute phase care of patients at high risk of VA can be safe and effective, and may be useful for evaluating indication of ICD implantation.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF