1. Accuracy and Reliability of 4D‐CT and Flexible Laryngoscopy in Upper Airway Evaluation in Robin Sequence
- Author
-
John P. Dahl, Russell E. Ettinger, Mark A. Egbert, Erin K. Romberg, Francisco A. Perez, Michael Bindschadler, Jeffrey P. Otjen, Matthew S. Blessing, Seth D. Friedman, Michael L. Cunningham, Jonathan A. Perkins, Austin S. Lam, Xing Wang, Emily R. Gallagher, Randall A. Bly, Kathleen C.Y. Sie, Kaalan Johnson, Srinivas M. Susarla, Kelly N. Evans, Carlton J. Zdanski, and Richard A. Hopper
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Laryngoscopy ,Computed tomography ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,030225 pediatrics ,Humans ,Medicine ,In patient ,Prospective Studies ,Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography ,Child ,030223 otorhinolaryngology ,Reliability (statistics) ,Retrospective Studies ,Robin Sequence ,Pierre Robin Syndrome ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Reproducibility of Results ,Airway obstruction ,medicine.disease ,Otorhinolaryngology ,Surgery ,Radiology ,Airway ,business - Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of 4-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) in assessing upper airway obstruction (UAO) in patients with Robin Sequence (RS) and compare the accuracy and reliability of 4D-CT and flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy (FFL). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective survey of retrospective clinical data. SETTING: Single, tertiary care pediatric hospital. METHODS: At initial and 30-day timepoints, a multidisciplinary group of 11 clinicians who treat RS rated UAO severity in 36 sets of 4D-CT visualizations and FFL videos (dynamic modalities), and static CT images. Raters assessed UAO at the velopharynx and oropharynx (1-none to 5-complete) and noted confidence levels (LOC) of each rating. Intraclass correlation and Krippendorff’s Alpha were used to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability, respectively. Accuracy was assessed by comparing clinician ratings with Quantitative Percent Constriction (QPC) Ratings, calculated based on 4D-CT airway cross-sectional area. Results were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and signed-rank tests. RESULTS: 4D-CT and FFL demonstrated similar intra-rater agreement (moderate to substantial) and both demonstrated fair inter-rater agreement. Both modalities underestimated UAO severity, though 4D-CT ratings were significantly more accurate, as determined by QPC similarity, than FFL (−1.06 and −1.46 vs QPC Ratings, p=0.004). Overall LOC was similar for 4D-CT and FFL, but other specialists were significantly less confident in FFL ratings than were otolaryngologists (2.25 and 3.92, p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF