Search

Xkin closure is a newly developed medical suture device for lacerations and surgical wounds that can reduce scarring, pain and the risk of infection compared with conventional sutures or staplers. A randomized controlled study was performed to compare the wound healing effects and complications of Xkin closure with stapler closure. Fifty patients who underwent robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer were randomly assigned. Only the wound above the navel, which was extended to take out the prostate was targeted. The wound was examined at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after surgery, and the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS), scar height and side effects were assessed with a 3D skin analyser. Forty‐six patients (23 Xkin, 23 Stapler) were analysed. The mVSS scores, vascularity and pliability were significantly lower in the Xkin group compared with the stapler group at the 12‐week follow‐up. No significant differences in the maximum peak and depth of the scars were detected between the two groups using 3D photographs at 12 weeks. Xkin is an effective wound closure method for improving scar outcomes. This method is expected to be widely used for surgical wounds and lacerations caused by trauma in daily life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We aimed to compare the mortality rate and the risk for progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) between patients who underwent surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) without surgery by investigating the National Health Insurance Service., Materials and Methods: The surgical group (CKD-S) included patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy for RCC from 2007 to 2009. Grades of surgical CKD were classified according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measured at a health screening within 2 years after surgery. The nonsurgical group (CKD-M) was graded according to the eGFR in the 2009-2010 health screenings. We performed 1:5 propensity score matching for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, Charlson comorbidity index, smoking, alcohol consumption, baseline eGFR, and body mass index., Results: A total of 8,698 patients (CKD-S, n=1,521; CKD-M, n=7,177) were analyzed. The CKD-M group was at higher risk for progression to ESRD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-3.44, p=0.036) and CVD (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06-1.29, p=0.002) than the CKD-S group. In the group of patients with grade 3 disease or higher, the CKD-M group was at significantly higher risk for progression to ESRD (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.47-3.31, p<0.001), CVD (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.20-1.45, p<0.001), and overall mortality (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.21-1.86, p<0.001)., Conclusions: The risk for progression to ESRD, CVD, or mortality in patients with CKD-S may be lower than in patients with CKD-M., Competing Interests: The authors have nothing to disclose., (© The Korean Urological Association.)