1. Artificial intelligence aided precise detection of local recurrence on MRI for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter cohort studyResearch in context
- Author
-
Pu-Yun OuYang, Yun He, Jian-Gui Guo, Jia-Ni Liu, Zhi-Long Wang, Anwei Li, Jiajian Li, Shan-Shan Yang, Xu Zhang, Wei Fan, Yi-Shan Wu, Zhi-Qiao Liu, Bao-Yu Zhang, Ya-Nan Zhao, Ming-Yong Gao, Wei-Jun Zhang, Chuan-Miao Xie, and Fang-Yun Xie
- Subjects
Artificial intelligence ,Diagnosis ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Nasopharyngeal carcinoma ,Recurrence ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 - Abstract
Summary: Background: MRI is the routine examination to surveil the recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but it has relatively lower sensitivity than PET/CT. We aimed to find if artificial intelligence (AI) could be competent pre-inspector for MRI radiologists and whether AI-aided MRI could perform better or even equal to PET/CT. Methods: This multicenter study enrolled 6916 patients from five hospitals between September 2009 and October 2020. A 2.5D convolutional neural network diagnostic model and a nnU-Net contouring model were developed in the training and test cohorts and used to independently predict and visualize the recurrence of patients in the internal and external validation cohorts. We evaluated the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of AI and compared AI with MRI and PET/CT in sensitivity and specificity using the McNemar test. The prospective cohort was randomized into the AI and non-AI groups, and their sensitivity and specificity were compared using the Chi-square test. Findings: The AI model achieved AUCs of 0.92 and 0.88 in the internal and external validation cohorts, corresponding to the sensitivity of 79.5% and 74.3% and specificity of 91.0% and 92.8%. It had comparable sensitivity to MRI (e.g., 74.3% vs. 74.7%, P = 0.89) but lower sensitivity than PET/CT (77.9% vs. 92.0%, P
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF