Search

The safety and efficacy of elective drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for unrestrictive de novo coronary stenosis in daily practice is not fully understood, especially in comparison to those of drug-eluting stents (DESs).A total of 588 consecutive de novo coronary stenotic lesions electively and successfully treated with either DCB (n=275) or DESs (n=313) between January 2016 and December 2019 at our medical center were included. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF), comprising cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. The secondary angiographic efficacy endpoint was angiographic restenosis frequency, defined as a follow-up percent diameter stenosis of50. The endpoints were compared after baseline adjustment using propensity score matching. In addition, the frequency and predictors of late lumen enlargement (LLE), defined as minus late luminal loss, were examined in 201 crude angiographic follow-up lesions after DCB angioplasty.A total of 31 baseline parameters were adjusted to analyze 177 lesions in each group. The TLF frequencies (DCB group: 9.6% during a mean observational interval of 789±488 days vs. DES group: 10.2%, 846±484 days, p=0.202) and cumulative TLF-free ratios of both groups were not significantly different (p=0.892, log-rank test). The angiographic restenosis frequency in the DCB group (6.3%, n=128) was not significantly different from that of the DES group (10.1%, n=100, p=0.593). LLE was observed in 45.3% of entire lesions, and a type-A dissection was a significant predictor of LLE among 23 variables (odds ratio: 3.02, 95% CI: 1.31-6.95, p=0.010).The present single-center retrospective study revealed statistically equivalent midterm clinical safety and angiographic efficacy among both elective DCB angioplasty and DESs placements in the treatment of unrestrictive de novo coronary lesions. In our daily practice environment, LLE was achieved in approximately half after DCB angioplasty.

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the gold standard treatment for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). PPCI reperfusion therapy has the potential to reduce infarct size, preserve the left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), prevent lethal complications, and improve prognosis. A significant proportion of STEMI patients, however, develop post-infarct heart failure despite optimal PPCI. One of the reasons for post-infarct heart failure is that reperfusion injury increases the infarct area after PPCI. This article reviews the current understanding and up-to-date evidence basis for therapeutic intervention of reperfusion injury. Specifically, the combination of myocardial ischemia secondary to acute coronary occlusion and reperfusion injury leads to further myocardial injury and cell death. Multiple treatment modalities have been shown to be cardioprotective and reduce reperfusion injury in experimental animal models. Recent clinical trials have assessed multiple cardioprotective strategies, including ischemic pre- and post-conditioning, pharmacologic therapies, and mechanical devices. While several therapies have been shown to reduce infarct size in animal models or proof-of-concept studies, many large-scale trial results have proven inconsistent and disappointing. To decrease the incidence of severe heart failure in patients and extend healthy life expectancy in an aging society, further development of prevention strategies for reperfusion injury is needed, including novel maneuvers, drugs, devices, and combinations of the three.

Intraprocedural stent thrombosis is a rare but serious complication of reperfusion therapy for acute coronary syndrome. There is currently no consensus on the intraprocedural management of intraprocedural stent thrombosis. It is difficult to attain thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3, particularly in cases of cardiogenic shock. A 49-year-old man who presented with anterior ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention to diffuse proximal lesions in the left anterior descending artery under the support of intra-aortic balloon pumping. Intraprocedural stent thrombosis occurred following the postdilations with a 3.5- × 38-mm everolimus-eluting stent. Despite administration of argatroban and nitroprusside, and after frequent balloon inflations using 3.5-mm noncompliant balloons and thrombectomy, the no-reflow phenomenon was repetitively established. However, after brief and prolonged balloon inflations using 3.5- and 3-mm Ryusei perfusion balloon catheters (Kaneka Medix), the diffusely protruded thrombus inside the stent regressed, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3 was obtained. The final intravascular ultrasound image showed a well-suppressed, in-stent thrombus and 24% gain of stent area (from 7.5 to 9.3 mm2). A Ryusei perfusion balloon enabled frequent, long inflation times without deteriorating hemodynamics during reperfusion in ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock. Thus, extended balloon inflation using a perfusion balloon is deemed a viable option not only for intraprocedural stent thrombosis but also for cases with a high burden of thrombi during the primary stenting procedure for patients with acute coronary syndrome.

We conducted a single-center, retrospective, lesion-based study to examine the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for de novo coronary stenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by comparing them with those of drug-eluting stents (DESs).A total of 309 consecutive lesions in patients with ACS who were successfully treated by emergent procedures using either a DCB (n = 107) or a DES between January 2016 and December 2019 were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF), defined as cardiac death without mortality due to ACS, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and any target lesion revascularization, including acute occlusion, after DCB use and definite stent thrombosis after DES placement. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to adjust the 36 baseline variables. Retrospective investigations were conducted in January 2021.Baseline adjustment yielded 91 lesions in each group, with a mean balloon size of 3.02 ± 0.22 mm and a mean length of 20.9 ± 6.2 mm in the DCB group. The frequency of TLF in the DCB group (9.9% during the mean observational interval of 671 ± 508 days) was not significantly different from that in the DES group (13.2% during a period of 626 ± 543 days, P = 0.467). The cumulative TLF-free ratio in the DCB group was not significantly different from that in the DES group (P = 0.475, log-rank test).The present propensity score-matched comparison showed statistically equivalent midterm clinical outcomes after DCB use to those of DES placement for de novo lesions in patients with ACS treated by emergent procedures.

Sulfatides might accelerate atherothrombosis. Therefore, this study aimed to monitor serum sulfatide levels in coronary arteries across atheromatous plaques during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with either drug-eluting stents or drug-coated balloons. From every patient, we collected blood from points 1 and 2 before PCI, and points 3 and 4 15 min after PCI, where odd numbered points were proximal and even numbered points were distal to a stenotic lesion. Patients were separated into two groups on the basis of the requirement of a pre-balloon dilation technique (pre-BD) before collecting samples at point 2. This was because of difficulty in passing a microcatheter through narrowed lumens around atheromatous lesions. In patients without pre-BD (n = 23), mean serum sulfatide levels at points 2 (4.60 ± 4.04 nmol/mL), 3 (4.35 ± 3.76 nmol/mL), and 4 (4.53 ± 3.26 nmol/mL) were significantly higher than those at point 1 (2.49 ± 1.11 nmol/mL; all p n = 18) required additional time (15–20 min) for collecting samples at points 2 to 4 compared with those without pre-BD, but there was no significant difference between the groups. The reason for this lack of significance is not known but may be due (at least in part) to diffusion of sulfatides in the circulation caused by the extra time needed for collection. These results suggest that accumulated sulfatides in stenotic plaques evoke atherothrombosis because of the thrombogenic property of sulfatides under pathological conditions.

Aim: We examined the impact of baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) on major cardiac adverse events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) during a long-term secondary prevention. Method: CEC was measured using a cell-based efflux system in (3)[H]-cholesterol-labeled J774 macrophages in apolipoprotein B-depleted plasma between January 2011 and January 2013. Patients with CAD were divided into 2 groups as a boundary CEC value of 1: 0.19 ≤ CEC ＜1 (impaired CEC group, mean CEC of 0.76±0.16, n =136), and 1 ≤ CEC ≤ 2.08 (enhanced CEC group, 1.20±0.19, n =44). MACE, comprised the incidence of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and any revascularizations (RV) without restenosis approximately 1 year after vascularization, was retrospectively investigated at September 2019. Impact of enhanced CEC on MACE among 22 variables was examined by applying a Cox proportional hazard model. Result: The frequency of MACE in impaired CEC group (16.9%, mean observational interval of 2111±888 days) was significantly higher than that in enhanced CEC group (2.3%, 2,252±685, p =0.013), largely driven by the significantly higher RV incidence (14.0 % versus 2.3 %, p =0.032). Enhancement of CEC was the significant predictor of MACE (hazard ratio: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.013-0.879; p =0.038). Conclusion: A baseline CEC level of more than 1 in patients with CAD brought favorable long-term clinical outcomes, suggesting that CEC is a useful prognostic and therapeutic surrogate for secondary prevention of CAD.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an uncommon etiology of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS); however, appropriate treatment based on early diagnosis can improve outcomes. We screened medical records of all ACS patients who were admitted to one of 8 different centers (Cardiovascular Research Consortium-8 Universities) and underwent emergent coronary angiography from January 2001 to December 2014. From these ACS patients, we selected the patients with SCAD based on a review of the results of coronary angiography. Patient demographics, treatment, and in-hospital and long-term outcomes were determined from a review of medical records and angiographic findings. Of the 9377 ACS patients, 20 (0.21%) were diagnosed with SCAD. In these 20 SCAD patients, the mean age was 48.6 ± 12.0 years old, and 19 patients were female (95.0%). In 3 patients (15%), SCAD was associated with pregnancy. Coronary spasm was associated with SCAD in 2 patients (10%). Two patients (10%) were treated conservatively, and percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 18 patients (90%). Two patients (10.0%) received target lesion revascularization, and one patient (5%) received coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). SCAD recurred in one patient (5%), and there was in-hospital death in one patient (5%) after CABG. The patient demographics and outcomes in this study were compatible with recent reports of SCAD, except for the trigger of coronary spasm. SCAD should be suspected in middle-aged female ACS patients, and conservative treatment is recommended when there is no ongoing ischemia or left main trunk dissection. In addition, close follow-up is important.

BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an effective treatment for patients with ischemic heart disease. In particular, restenosis is suppressed after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. However, several problems remain. Previously, we reported neointimal proliferation after DES implantation, which was associated with insulin resistance (IR). The aim of the present study was to clarify whether IR is associated with mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after 1st-generation DES implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS We researched the clinical records of 109 patients who had undergone elective PCI and DES implantation between May 2007 and December 2010. We segregated these patients according to the value of the homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) into Group P (n=63; HOMA-IR ≥2.5, positive) and Group N (n=46; HOMA-IR

背景:冠動脈疾患において以前よりフラミンガムリスクスコア(Framingham Risk Score:FRS)は10 年以内の虚血性心疾患発症を予測することが知られている.また近年,冠動脈マルチスライスCT(MultisliceConputed Tomography:MSCT)により求められる冠動脈カルシウムスコア(Coronary Artery CalciumScore:CACS)や種々の炎症マーカーが冠動脈疾患予測因子として報告されている.目的:年齢,性別,総コレステロール値,High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)コレステロール値,収縮期血圧,喫煙の有無から簡易に求めることのできるFRS を算出し,FRS と冠動脈疾患各動脈硬化リスク因子について検討した.対象:2009 年6 月から2011 年9 月までに当院に虚血性心疾患精査目的に受診しMSCT および,冠動脈造影を施行した連続347 例(男性229 例,女性108 例)についてFRS を計測し15 以上の高リスク群(H 群)と15未満の低リスク群(L 群)に分類した.冠動脈造影における有病率と冠動脈疾患予測因子であるCT にて計測されるCACS,及び血液検査における炎症マーカーについて比較検討した.結果:対象はH 群149 例,L 群198 例に分けられた.冠動脈造影における冠動脈疾患有病率はH 群53.6%,L 群41.4%とH 群において有意に高値であった(P=0.023).CACS においてもH 群687.1±759.1,L 群489.8±725.6 とH 群において有意に高値であった(P=0.015).血液検査におけるマーカーにおいては高感度CRP(H 群 vs L 群:0.29±0.70 vs 0.17±0.29 mg/dl P=0.046)と酸化Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol(LDL)(H 群 vs L 群:110.2±47.0 vs 96.8±35.6 U/L P=0.007)において有意差を認めた.結語:FRS は簡便に計測でき,各種冠動脈疾患予測因子とも関連しており冠動脈疾患予測の一助となりうる可能性があると考えた., Background: The Framingham risk score (FRS) is widely used inclinical practice to identify subjects at high risk for developingischemic heart disease. However, FRS may not accuratelyidentify subjects at risk. Recently, coronary arterycalcium score (CACS) detected by multi-slice computedtomography (MSCT) and several atherosclerosis riskmarkers has been known to predict ischemic heart diseases.Subjects: The aim of this study is to clarify the relation betweenFRS and several coronary risk factors. We researched theclinical records of 347 patients who had been subjected toMSCT and coronary angiography( CAG) between Jun 2009and September 2011. We subdivided these patients by thevalue of FRS into a group H (n=149;FRS ≥ 15) and agroup L( n=198;FRS

目的:虚血性心疾患に対する経皮的冠動脈形成術(Percutaneous coronary intervention:PCI)は有用な治療法として確立されている.薬剤溶出性ステント(Drug-eluting stent:DES)により,大きな問題であった再狭窄は減少したが,完全には克服されていない.最近糖尿病の前段階としてインスリン抵抗性が注目されており,再狭窄に影響を及ぼすことが示唆されている.今回我々はHomeostasis Model Assessment 指数(HOMA-IR)を用いてインスリン抵抗性の程度とDES 留置後の再狭窄の関連を検討した.方法:2007 年5 月から2010 年10 月までに待機的にPCI を施行しDES を留置した248 例について,HOMAIRより高度インスリン抵抗性を有する群(H 群:n=75)と中等度インスリン抵抗性を有する群(M 群:n=64)およびインスリン抵抗性を有さない群(L 群:n=109)に分類し,定量的冠動脈造影を用いて再狭窄率および再狭窄関連因子について検討した.結果:再狭窄率はH 群で有意に高かった(p=0.0005).慢性期最小血管径はH 群で他の2 群と比較して有意に小さかった(H:1.62±1.02 mm,M:2.42±0.48 mm,L:2.17±0.70 mm, p=0.0086).さらに%狭窄率はH 群で他の2 群と比較して有意に大きく(H:40.1±34.7%,M::14.7±10.4%,L:22.7±21.6%, p=0.0092),晩期損失径もH 群で他の2 群と比較して有意に大きかった(H:0.87±0.90 mm,M:0.19±0.17 mm,L:0.41±0.62 mm, p=0.0097).結論:高度インスリン抵抗性は,DES 留置後再狭窄の危険因子となりえると考えられた., INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has beenwidely adopted as an effective treatment strategy for patientswith ischemic heart disease;especially, restenosis issuppressed after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.However, coronary artery restenosis after DES implantationstill appear now and then. The aim of this study was toclarify the factors associated with coronary artery restenosisafter DES implantation and evaluate the homeostasismodel assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) indexas a predictor of restenosis.METHODS: We reserched the clinical records of 248 patients who hadbeen subjected to elective PCI and DES implantation betweenMay 2007 and December 2010. We divided these patientsby the value of HOMA-IR into three groups(GroupH;HOMA-IR≧5 . 0 , Group M;2 . 5≦HOMA-IRHOMA-IR), and examined the relationshipbetween coronary artery restenosis and HOMA-IR.RESULTS: The rate of restenosis was significantly higher in GroupH (26.7 %) than in the other two groups (M;7.8 % andL;8.3%, p=0.0005 %). Follow up MLD was significantlylower in Group H (H;1.62±1.02 mm v.s. M;2.42±0.48 mm v.s. L;2.17±0.70 mm, p=0.0086). Furthermore, %stenosis and late lumen loss was significantly higher inGroup H (H;40.1±34.7%, M;14.7±10.4%, L;22.7±21.6%, p=0.0092, and H;0.87±0.9 mm v.s. M;0.19±0.17 mmv.s. L;0.41±0.62 mm, P=0.0097). Logistic analysis showedthat the only independent predictor of restenosis was HOMA-IR over 5.0( OR 2.87;p=0.004).CONCLUSION: The results suggested that severe insulin resistance wasa predictor of restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation;furthermore, that improvement of insulin resistancemay contribute to prevent coronary restenosis after drugelutingstent implantation.

目的:虚血性心疾患の危険因子としてメタボリックシンドロームが注目されているが,その背景にはインスリン抵抗性が存在している.一方,虚血性心疾患の治療において経皮的冠動脈形成術(percutaneouscoronary intervention:PCI)は有用な治療法であるが再狭窄が課題である.近年薬剤溶出性ステント(Drugelutingstent:DES)が臨床応用され再狭窄は減少しているものの,ステント血栓症や晩期再狭窄であるlatecatch up 現象などの慢性期における新たな課題が散見されている.今回我々はインスリン抵抗性とDES 留置患者の慢性期の心血管イベントの関連を調べるためにインスリン抵抗性をHomeostasis Model Assessment 指数(HOMA-IR)を用いて検討した.方法:2004 年8 月より2008 年11 月までにPCI を施行しDES を使用した109 例についてHOMA-IR を計測しインスリン抵抗性を認める群(P 群:n=63)と認めない群(N 群:n=46)にわけ慢性期における心血管イベントについて検討した.結果:観察期間は平均で5.48±1.30 年であった.心臓死,再狭窄,心筋梗塞,脳梗塞,心不全,ステント血栓症においては両群間において有意差を認めなかった.しかしlate catch up 現象においてはP 群12.7%とN 群2.2%と有意差を認めた(p=0.048).結論:インスリン抵抗性はDES 留置後のlate catch up 現象の予測因子であった.インスリン抵抗性を改善させることにより慢性期における心血管イベントのさらなる減少が期待される., PURPOSE:Percutaneous coronary intervention( PCI) isan effective treatment for patients with ischemic heart disease;especially, restenosis is suppressed after drug-elutingstent (DES) implantation. However, several problemsstill remain. Previously, we reported neo-intimal proliferationafter DES implantation that was associated with insulinresistance. The aim of this study was to clarify whether insulinresistance was associated with Major Adverse Cardiacand Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) after DES implantation.METHODS:We researched the clinical records of 109patients who had been subjected to elective PCI and DESimplantation between May 2007 and December 2010. Wedistributed these patients by the value of homeostasis modelassessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) into aGroup P (n=63;HOMA-IR ≥ 2.5, positive) and a Group N(n=46;HOMA-IR

Aims Complex fractionated electrograms (CFEs) and high-dominant-frequency (DF) sites theoretically represent abnormal substrates and targets for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The relationship between the high-DF sites in the left atrium (LA) and commonly used linear ablation line to the distribution of the CFEs in patients with persistent AF is unknown. Methods and results This study enrolled 62 persistent AF patients who underwent construction of LA CFE and DF maps (>350 points/map). Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablation including that at the septum, roof, mitral-annulus, and ridge of the appendage were performed. Multipolar catheter mapping identified sites with high DFs (≥8 Hz) in all patients (9.8 ± 4.6/patient). In 47 patients in whom AF persisted despite ablation, there was a significant reduction in the continuous CFE (

This paper is concerned with the 3D trajectory of particle released from the crest of modeled river bed configuration. The trajectory of particle was visualized by using of two CCD video cameras. One of them is placed on the flume and the other is placed at the flume side.After the correction for particle coordinate, the particle trajectory was shown by means of wire frame method, and moreover the 3D trajectory was indicated realistically by means of ray tracing method.The results of this paper are as follows : A ccording to increasing discharge, trajectory of particle showed a complex motion such as abruptly upward or swirly motion.