Search

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-dhj-10.1177_20552076231178422 for Patterns of acceptance and use of digital health services among the persistent frequent attenders of outpatient care: A qualitatively driven multimethod analysis by Lotta Virtanen, Anu-Marja Kaihlanen, Emma Kainiemi, Petra Saukkonen and Tarja Heponiemi in DIGITAL HEALTH

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-dhj-10.1177_20552076231173559 for Perceived benefits of digital health and social services among older adults: A population-based cross-sectional survey by Emma Kainiemi, Petra Saukkonen, Lotta Virtanen, Tuulikki Vehko, Maiju Kyytsönen, Mari Aaltonen and Tarja Heponiemi in DIGITAL HEALTH

Funding Information: This study was supported by the Strategic Research Council of the Academy of Finland (project 327145) and the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (project 414919001). ME was supported by the Academy of Finland (project 339 390). The authors would like to express their gratitude to all physicians who responded to the questionnaire as well as the Finnish Medical Association for collaboration. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Medical Internet Research. All rights reserved. Background: In health care, the benefits of digitalization need to outweigh the risks, but there is limited knowledge about the factors affecting this balance in the work environment of physicians. To achieve the benefits of digitalization, a more comprehensive understanding of this complex phenomenon related to the digitalization of physicians'work is needed. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine physicians' perceptions of the effects of health care digitalization on their work and to analyze how these perceptions are associated with multiple factors related to work and digital health usage. Methods: A representative sample of 4630 (response rate 24.46%) Finnish physicians (2960/4617, 64.11% women) was used. Statements measuring the perceived effects of digitalization on work included the patients' active role, preventive work, interprofessional cooperation, decision support, access to patient information, and faster consultations. Network analysis of the perceived effects of digitalization and factors related to work and digital health usage was conducted using mixed graphical modeling. Adjusted and standardized regression coefficients are denoted by b. Centrality statistics were examined to evaluate the relative influence of each variable in terms of node strength. Results: Nearly half of physicians considered that digitalization has promoted an active role for patients in their own care (2104/4537, 46.37%) and easier access to patient information (1986/4551, 43.64%), but only 1 in 10 (445/4529, 9.82%) felt that the impact has been positive on consultation times with patients. Almost half of the respondents estimated that digitalization has neither increased nor decreased the possibilities for preventive work (2036/4506, 45.18%) and supportiveness of clinical decision support systems (1941/4458, 43.54%). When all variables were integrated into the network, the most influential variables were purpose of using health information systems, employment sector, and specialization status. However, the grade given to the electronic health record (EHR) system that was primarily used had the strongest direct links to faster consultations (b=0.32) and facilitated access to patient information (b=0.28). At least 6 months of use of the main EHR was associated with facilitated access to patient information (b=0.18). Conclusions: The results highlight the complex interdependence of multiple factors associated with the perceived effects of digitalization on physicians'work. It seems that a high-quality EHR system is critical for promoting smooth clinical practice. In addition, work-related factors may influence other factors that affect digital health success. These factors should be considered when developing and implementing new digital health technologies or services for physicians' work. The adoption of digital health is not just a technological project but a project that changes existing work practices.

Asiakas- ja potilastietojärjestelmät ovat sairaanhoitajien työssä keskeisiä työvälineitä. Artikkelissa selvitettiin, missä määrin eri asiakas- ja potilastietojärjestelmät tukevat sairaanhoitajien työtä eri toimintaympäristöissä. Tavoitteena oli tuottaa tietoa kansallisen tiedonhallinnan strategian täyttymisestä ja sairaanhoitajien käyttäjäkokemuksista palautteeksi tietojärjestelmätoimittajille. Tiedonkeruu sairaanhoitajien tietojärjestelmäkokemuksista toteutettiin keväällä 2020 kyselynä. Kyselyyn vastasi 3912 sairaanhoitajaa, joista pääosa työskenteli julkisessa sairaalassa, terveyskeskuksessa, sosiaalialalla tai yksityissektorilla. Yleisimmin käytettyjä asiakas- ja potilasjärjestelmiä olivat yleisyysjärjestyksessä Lifecare asiakas- ja potilastietojärjestelmä (Lifecare), Uranus, Pegasos, Apotti (tuotemerkki: Epic), Effica terveydenhuolto (Effica), Mediatri, Esko, DynamicHealth ja DomaCare. Kyselyn väittämistä raportoitiin teemoja, jotka koskevat tietojärjestelmien kykyä tukea vuorovaikutusta (4), hyötyjä (4), käytettävyyttä (2), teknistä toimivuutta (3) sekä paperin ja faksin käyttöä (1), tietojärjestelmille annettavia kouluarvosanoja (1) ja järjestelmätoimittajille suoraan annettavaa palautetta (30). Kysely tehtiin sairaanhoitajille toista kertaa, ja pohdinnassa tarkasteltiin muutoksia vuoteen 2017 nähden. Tulosten mukaan tietojärjestelmien tuki sairaanhoitajien työlle parantui tai pysyi ennallaan monien muuttujien osalta. Tulokset vaihtelivat asiakas- ja potilastietojärjestelmien tuotemerkkien ja toimintaympäristöjen välillä ja myös samojen tuotemerkkien välillä eri toimintaympäristöissä. Sairaanhoitajat olivat tyytyväisiä etenkin tietojärjestelmien kykyyn tukea yhteistyötä ja tiedonkulkua sairaanhoitajien kesken organisaation sisällä sekä sairaanhoitajien ja lääkärien välillä. He myös kokivat, että tietojärjestelmät tuottavat hyötyjä asiakkaiden ja potilaiden hoitoprosessille. Toisaalta organisaatioiden välisessä tiedonkulussa turvauduttiin edelleen paperiin ja faksiin. Lisäksi vastaajat tunnistivat asiakas- ja potilastietojärjestelmissä enemmän työtä hankaloittavia kuin hyvin toimivia ominaisuuksia. Vaikka tietojärjestelmien kehityssuunta vaikutti positiiviselta, eivät ne kaikilta osin edelleenkään tukeneet sairaanhoitajien työtä riittävällä tasolla ja näin ollen tietojärjestelmien systemaattista seurantaa on syytä jatkaa., Information systems are key tools for nursing care. The article examines the extent to which different client information systems and electronic health records support the work of nurses in specific work environments. The aim is to provide information on the achievement of the national strategy for information management and on nurses’ user experiences of individual systems as feedback to the system suppliers. The data collection was carried out as a survey on nurses' system experiences in the spring of 2020. The survey was answered by 3,912 nurses. Most of the respondents worked in public hospitals, community health centers, social services or private sector. The most commonly used client information systems and electronic health records were in order of frequency: Lifecare, Uranus, Pegasos, Apotti (system brand: Epic), Effica Healthcare, Mediatri, Esko, DynamicHealth and DomaCare. The questions that were reported in the study were related to information systems’ ability to support interaction (4), benefits (4), usability (2), and technical functionality (3) and the use of paper and fax (1), information systems’ evaluation on a numeric scale (1) and direct feedback to system suppliers (30). The survey for nurses was conducted for the second time, so it was possible to examine the changes since 2017. According to the results, it appeared that the information systems’ ability to support work improved or remained unchanged for the most part. The results varied by information system brands and between the work environments as well as between the same brands in different work environments. Nurses appeared to be particularly satisfied with the information systems' ability to support collaboration and information flow between nurses within their own organization and between nurses and physicians. They also felt that the information systems provided benefits to the care process of clients and patients. On the other hand, the information flow between organizations was still dependent on paper and fax. The respondents also identified more problems than well-functioning features in the information systems. Thus, although the development trend of the information systems appeared to be positive, the information systems did not fully support the work of nurses in all respects. Therefore the systematic monitoring of the information systems is worth continuing.

Additional file 1: Table S1. The eligibility and recruitment process of the participants. Table S2. The demographics and description of the study participants. Text file S1. The interview guide.

Additional file 2. Descriptions on the suggestions for development to improve the accessibility of digital health services and increase digital health equity.

Additional file 1. Measures used in the study.

Background: Although the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly boosted the implementation of digital services worldwide, it has become increasingly important to understand how these solutions are integrated into professionals’ routine work. Professionals who are using the services are key influencers in the success of implementations. To ensure successful implementations, it is important to understand the multiprofessional perspective, especially because implementations are likely to increase even more. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine health and social care professionals’ experiences of digital service implementations and to identify factors that support successful implementations and should be considered in the future to ensure that the services are integrated into professionals’ routine work. Methods: A qualitative approach was used, in which 8 focus group interviews were conducted with 30 health and social care professionals from 4 different health centers in Finland. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The resulting categories were organized under the components of normalization process theory. Results: Our results suggested 14 practices that should be considered when implementing new digital services into routine work. To get professionals to understand and make sense of the new service, (1) the communication related to the implementation should be comprehensive and continuous and (2) the implementation process should be consistent. (3) A justification for the service being implemented should also be given. The best way to engage the professionals with the service is (4) to give them opportunities to influence and (5) to make sure that they have a positive attitude toward the service. To enact the new service into professionals’ routine work, it is important that (6) the organization take a supportive approach by providing support from several easy and efficient sources. The professionals should also have (7) enough time to become familiar with the service, and they should have (8) enough know-how about the service. The training should be (9) targeted individually according to skills and work tasks, and (10) it should be diverse. The impact of the implementation on the professionals’ work should be evaluated. The service (11) should be easy to use, and (12) usage monitoring should happen. An opportunity (13) to give feedback on the service should also be offered. Moreover, (14) the service should support professionals’ work tasks. Conclusions: We introduce 14 practices for organizations and service providers on how to ensure sustainable implementation of new digital services and the smooth integration into routine work. It is important to pay more attention to comprehensive and continuing communication. Organizations should conduct a competence assessment before training in order to ensure proper alignment. Follow-ups to the implementation process should be performed to guarantee sustainability of the service. Our findings from a forerunner country of digitalization can be useful for countries that are beginning their service digitalization or further developing their digital services.

Funding Information: The authors thank the participating organizations and respondents. We are grateful to Head Nurse Ulla Kemppainen for her assistance in distributing the survey. This work was supported by the Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland (Grant Nos 327145 and 327147) and NordForsk through the funding to Nordic eHealth for Patients: Benchmarking and Developing for the Future (NORDeHEALTH), project number 100477. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Iiris Hörhammer, Sari Kujala, Pirjo Hilama, Tarja Heponiemi. Background: Health care personnel's (HCP) engagement in patient portal implementation is necessary in embedding the use of the portal in everyday practices of a health care organization. While portal implementation may raise personnel's positive expectations of the benefits in patient care, it is often also stressful for them due to increased workloads and disruptions in clinical workflows. An understanding of social and technical factors that build personnel's support for patient portal implementation and alleviate their eHealth-related stress is therefore needed to realize the full potential of portals. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the influence of managerial implementation practices, information technology (IT) usability, and personnel's eHealth competences on support for patient portal implementation and eHealth-related stress among primary HCP. Methods: The data were collected through a survey of 919 members at 2 health organizations in Finland. Linear and logistic regression models were fitted to study the associations between the variables. Results: Professionals' eHealth competence (β=.15, P

Background: The significance of web-based health and social care services has been highlighted in recent years. There is a risk that the digitalization of public services will reinforce the digital and social exclusion of vulnerable groups, such as individuals with mental health problems. Objective: This study aims to examine the associations between mental health problems and attitudes toward web-based health and social care services in the general population. The attitudes measured include lack of interest, perceived need for face-to-face encounters, and concern for safety. The study also evaluates whether sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, education level, and poverty) modify these associations. Methods: Cross-sectional population-based data were collected from 4495 Finnish adults in 2017. Linear regression was used to examine the main effects and interactions of poor mental health and sociodemographic characteristics on attitudes toward web-based health and social care services. Results: The results show that mental health was associated with attitudes toward web-based health and social care services. Individuals with mental health problems were especially concerned about the safety of web-based services. Poor mental health was independently associated with negative attitudes toward web-based services over the effects of sociodemographic factors. Some of the associations between poor mental health and negative attitudes toward web-based services were stronger among older people and men. With regard to sociodemographic characteristics, particularly higher age, low education, and poverty were associated with negative attitudes toward web-based health and social care services. Conclusions: Poor mental health is associated with negative attitudes toward web-based health and social care services and thus indirectly with exclusion. It seems that being older and being male both reinforce the link between poor mental health and exclusion. In supporting the digital inclusion of people with mental health problems, attention should be paid to guidance and counseling, reliability, and the user-friendliness of web-based services as well as to the prevention of poverty. In addition, it is essential to see web-based services as complementary to, and not a substitute for, face-to-face services.