Search

Murlidhar Rajagopalan,1 Sunil Dogra,2 Kiran Godse,3 Bikash Ranjan Kar,4 Sai Krishna Kotla,5 Shekhar Neema,6 Abir Saraswat,7 Swapnil Deepak Shah,8 Nina Madnani,9,10 Vidyadhar Sardesai,11 Rajiv Sekhri,12 Sachin Varma,13 Sandeep Arora,14 Pallavi Kawatra15 1Department of Dermatology, Apollo Hospital, Chennai, India; 2Department of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India; 3DY Patil University School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, India; 4Department of Dermatology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India; 5Department of Dermatology, Yashodha Hospital, Secunderabad, India; 6Department of Dermatology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India; 7Indushree Skin Clinic, Lucknow, India; 8Department of Dermatology, Ashwini Rural Medical College, Solapur, India; 9Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, India; 10Sir. H. N. Reliance Hospital, Mumbai, India; 11Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College, Pune, India; 12Fortis Hospital, Noida, India; 13Skinvita Clinic, Kolkata, West Bengal, India; 14Army College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; 15Novartis, Mumbai, IndiaCorrespondence: Murlidhar Rajagopalan, Department of Dermatology, Apollo Hospital, Chennai, India, Email docmurli@gmail.comPurpose: The primary objective of the study was to understand the therapeutic inertia in treatment and management of plaque psoriasis among dermatologists, along with determining the preferred treatment choices for management of plaque psoriasis; it also included the resulting treatment satisfaction among patients. The secondary objective was to identify the gaps in terms of knowledge and attitude among dermatologists and the expectations of patients.Patients and Methods: A multicentre, cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted among dermatologists and patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis across India. The interviews were conducted either face to face or via telephone between September and November 2020, using structured and validated questionnaires based on specific themes. The data obtained were statistically analysed, wherever applicable.Results: Overall, 207 adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and 303 dermatologists were interviewed. Post experiencing symptoms, 44% of the patients visited general physicians for treatment and there was an average 7.8-month delay by the patients to consult a dermatologist. Approximately one-fourth of patients used home remedies before seeking medical help. One-third of dermatologists used the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) for assessing the disease severity. Majority of dermatologists preferred combination therapy for their patients. The lack of quick resolution and side effects were the major reasons for changing the treatment. Overall, only 35% of the patients complied to current treatment. Satisfaction with existing forms of therapies was highest for mild plaque psoriasis (62%) as confirmed by dermatologists, while 52% of the overall patients were satisfied with their therapy. Majority of the patients (64%) affirmed living with plaque psoriasis impacted their lives.Conclusion: This first-of-its-kind survey in India highlighted the gaps in terms of the disease journey between dermatologists and patients. The survey emphasises the need for shared decision-making and may benefit dermatologists in suggestive modifications of the treatment algorithm and disease management in clinical settings.Keywords: therapeutic inertia, psoriasis, adherence, treatment expectations, treatment goals, diagnosis

Byline: K. Godse, N. Nadkarni, G. Jani Sir, Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) is a rather common skin disorder characterized by the recurrent eruption of short-lived wheals accompanied by redness and [...]

Byline: K. Godse Sir, We read with interest an article by Ghiya et al. on masturbation and urticaria.[sup] [1] Authors describe a 30-year-old, married male with a history of recurrent [...]

Byline: K. Godse Sir, Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) is a rather common skin disorder characterized by the recurrent eruption of short-lived wheals accompanied by redness and itching for at least [...]

Byline: K. Godse Sir, Urticaria patients are usually treated with oral antihistamines and 50% of them respond well to this treatment. However, the other 50% do not respond to antihistamines [...]

Byline: K. Godse Sir, Delayed pressure urticaria (DPU) is a physical urticaria in which pressure is the physical stimulus that causes whealing. Pressure (defined as the force applied to a [...]

Copyright of Dermatology Review / Przeglad Dermatologiczny is the property of Termedia Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Dermatology Review / Przeglad Dermatologiczny is the property of Termedia Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Chronic urticaria has a wide spectrum of clinical presentations and causes. Still, despite our best efforts no cause may be found in the majority of cases. The treatment options are: Primary prevention in the form of avoidance of aggravating factors; counseling; antihistamines; leukotriene receptor antagonists; prednisolone; sulfasalazine and a host of immunosuppressives like methotrexate, cyclosporine, omalizumab etc.

Chronic urticaria in children occurs less often than adults. Out of 17 children (age group 6-16 years, [Table 2]), six children (2 boys and 4 girls, 35%) showed a positive result in form of wheal and flare more than 1.5 mm than saline control.Autologous serum skin test is cheap, is easy to perform, and, if performed as appropriate, it has good sensitivity and even better specificity at detecting autoantibodies in children.

A letter to the editor is presented which discusses the diagnosis of wolly hair syndrome.

Generalised pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, multisystemic, autoinflammatory disease with predominantly cutaneous manifestations, characterised by recurrent episodes of widespread, macroscopic and aseptic pustules. It has a highly unpredictable, heterogeneous and unstable clinical course. There are no consensus guidelines in India for the management of GPP. The objective of this Delphi panel study was to achieve consensus on problem areas in the understanding and management of GPP. Based on the inputs from an expert panel, 19 topics across six domains were identified as being important regarding the understanding and management of GPP. Statements were developed for these 19 topics, and consensus for the statements was sought using the modified Delphi method. Twelve experts evaluated the statements, indicating their agreement or disagreement. Consensus was considered to be reached when ≥80% of experts agreed with a statement. After two rounds of discussion, consensus was reached for 17 out of 19 (89%) statements and no consensus was achieved for two (11%) statements. We have presented the statements along with the respective degrees of consensus. Wherever relevant, clarifications or additional comments by experts are provided in the document.

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a distressing skin condition characterized by the recurrent appearance of itchy hives. A subset of CSU patients remains resistant to conventional treatment with high-dose antihistamines. Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, has shown promise in various inflammatory skin diseases. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral tofacitinib in patients with CSU resistant to antihistamines., Methods: This study examined data retrospectively from seven patients who were diagnosed with CSU and were treated with tofacitinib for at least six months. These patients initially exhibited resistance to treatment with four-fold up-dosed antihistamines. One of the patients was already on omalizumab, and another was tried on cyclosporine. The patients were administered oral tofacitinib at a dosage of 5 mg twice daily for six months. Patients were followed up monthly for disease control and side effects. The response to treatment was evaluated using the urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7) and urticaria control test (UCT). Paired t-tests were conducted to determine the statistical significance of the results using SPSS version 25 software., Results: Six out of the seven patients demonstrated a significant improvement in both UAS7 and UCT scores after six months of treatment with oral tofacitinib. The mean UAS7 score decreased from 24.86 at baseline to 3.83 at the study endpoint ( P < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean UCT score increased from 0.57 at baseline to 14 at the study endpoint ( P < 0.0001). The standard deviations for both measures were 4.85 and 0.98 at baseline and 3.1 and 3.1 at the study endpoint for UAS7 and UCT, respectively., Conclusion: In this six-month follow-up study, oral tofacitinib demonstrated significant efficacy in treating CSU patients' resistant to high-dose antihistamines. Most patients experienced a remarkable reduction in urticaria activity and an improvement in disease control. These findings suggest that tofacitinib holds promise as a potential therapeutic option for this challenging subset of CSU patients. However, larger, randomized controlled trials are warranted to further investigate the long-term safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in this population., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2024 Indian Journal of Dermatology.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) has a complex etiology that includes Th2 polarization, which is accompanied by the cytokines IL4, IL-5, IL-13, and IL-31, as well as Th17 and Th22, and in chronic lesions, Th1 cells. Tofacitinib inhibits Th1-, Th2-, and Th17-associated cytokines by selectively blocking JAK1 and JAK3 receptors. We conducted a multicentric, retrospective chart analysis to study the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with moderate to severe refractory AD., Materials and Methods: We included 16 adult patients (aged >18 years) with moderate to severe AD who had previously undergone systemic therapy with inadequate response. In the baseline, demographic data, previous treatment history, severity scores (eczema area and severity index [EASI] and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis [SCORAD]), and quality of life score (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]) were noted. Baseline blood investigations, including complete blood count, liver function test, renal function test, lipid profile, and interferon gamma release assay for tuberculosis, were done. Patients were followed up every month for 6 months that included documentation of severity scores, blood investigations, and DLQI. Any adverse events, if reported, were noted., Result: All 16 patients completed the 6-month trial. Our patients were previously treated with cyclosporine (n = 10), methotrexate (n = 3), or both (n = 3). The mean EASI scores improved from 23.38 ± 9.56 at baseline to 8.50 ± 7.57 at the end of 6 months. The mean SCORAD score improved from 41.25 ± 8.69 at baseline to 14.93 ± 7.82 at the end of 6 months. Quality of life also improved as the mean DLQI improved from 15.18 ± 2.73 at baseline to 5.31 ± 4.11 at the end of the study period. No severe adverse reactions were noted, but 3 patients experienced dyslipidemia and 2 patients had altered bleeding time., Conclusion: Tofacitinib is a safe and effective treatment option for recalcitrant moderate to severe adult AD., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2024 Indian Journal of Dermatology.)

Background: Selenium sulfide, available as a shampoo or topical lotion at 1%, or 2.5% concentrations in India, is used as a topical antiseborrheic and antifungal for the treatment of dandruff, seborrheic dermatitis, psoriasis, and tinea versicolor. In the present study, the safety, efficacy, and attributes of 2.5% selenium sulfide shampoo were evaluated in Indian participants with dandruff., Methods: A single-center, single-arm, prospective, investigator-initiated, open-label, post-marketing interventional study was conducted on Indian subjects aged 18-70 years diagnosed with moderate dandruff who were prescribed 2.5% selenium sulfide shampoo every three days for four weeks. The primary endpoints were 1) reduction in total dandruff score assessed using a clinical grading scale for adherent and loose dandruff from baseline to weeks 1, 2, and 4, and 2) incidence of adverse events up to the end of the study. The key secondary endpoints were 1) participants' perception of shampoo attributes (dandruff reduction, scalp itch, scalp oiliness/greasiness, or fragrance) as assessed by a subjective self-assessment questionnaire post-first wash and at weeks 1, 2, and/or 4; 2) satisfaction with treatment as assessed by investigators and participants using a subjective self-assessment questionnaire at week 4; and 3) reduction in scalp sebum as assessed with a meibometer at weeks 2 and 4. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for continuous variables and the Chi-square test for categorical variables. A p-value of 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant., Results: Of 34 enrolled subjects, 30 completed the four-week study. The mean (standard deviation, SD) age of the study participants was 29.8 (7.87) years, with the majority being females (n=18; 60.0%). Mean (SD) total dandruff score significantly (p=0.001) reduced from a baseline score of 11.5 (2.15) to 7.17 (2.12) at week 1, 4.93 (1.72) at week 2, and 2.5 (1.17) at week 4. All the participants reported dandruff reduction and acceptable fragrance of the shampoo at four weeks. Absence of itching and reduction in oiliness was reported by 73.3% (n=22) of participants at week 4 and by 50.0% (n=15) of participants at week 2, respectively. All participants reported good, very good, or excellent satisfaction with the test shampoo at week 4, whereas the investigators rated the shampoo as very good or excellent in managing dandruff in all participants. At week 4, erythema was reported to be absent in all participants. No adverse events were reported during the study., Conclusions: The 2.5% selenium sulfide shampoo was found to be effective in the management of dandruff and related symptoms like itching, oiliness, and greasiness and had a good safety profile in Indian participants with dandruff., Competing Interests: The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section., (Copyright © 2024, Godse et al.)

Background Treating dermatological pathologies under occlusion therapy is a popular adjunct, especially in thickened, lichenified areas of psoriasis where sustained contact with topical corticosteroids plays a pivotal role. Film-forming spray (FFS) can be a novel, alternate approach along with topical treatment in this area for carefully selected cases. This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile and physical characteristics of a novel formulation of an FFS in patients with psoriasis and eczema.  Methods This open-label, multicentre, comparative study included subjects diagnosed with chronic plaque psoriasis requiring topical corticosteroid therapy or those with eczema necessitating its application and occlusion therapy. The study product was applied to two groups of subjects. For patients in group 1, the FFS was applied to the skin area affected by the dermatological condition, which was covered with ointment only. In the second group, the FFS was applied to the corresponding unaffected skin area. The FFS was applied for 60-90 seconds and was observed for two hours after the application. The subjects were evaluated for primary outcomes, including safety assessment, overall physical characteristics, and appearance of FFS from local skin effects. The secondary outcomes included physical appearance characteristics and overall patient satisfaction following the application of FFS at the target sites. Further statistical assessments were conducted using the SAS software version 9.4 (2023; SAS Institute Inc ., Cary, North Carolina, United States). Result A total of 100 subjects were included in the study across 10 outpatient centers, of which 79% had psoriatic plaques and 21% had eczematous lesions. Primary outcomes showed a lack of appearance of clinical symptoms such as dryness, flakiness, or irritation. A total of 10% of subjects in group 1 had erythema, and 6% had a tingling sensation, which was transient and mild. The secondary outcomes showed that only 12% of subjects in Group 1 and 6% of subjects in Group 2 showed a feeling of stickiness at the application site. In group 1, 8% reported a cooling sensation, which disappeared in one and two minutes, and none experienced a cooling sensation in Group 2. The average drying time for FFS in subjects with dermatological conditions was 5.19 minutes compared to 1.51 minutes on unaffected skin. The film washability results indicated that 96% of subjects in group 1 reported complete removal in less than two minutes. At the end of the study period, the mean satisfaction score was 8.99. No significant adverse events were reported in the patients. Conclusion This study highlights the potential application of a novel formulation of FFS as a safe and well-tolerated option for enhancing uniform skin coverage with the topical corticosteroid in patients affected with psoriasis and eczema., Competing Interests: The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section., (Copyright © 2024, Godse et al.)

Introduction: The treatment options for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) primarily include second generation non-sedative antihistamine (SGAHs). Bilastine is a newer, nonsedating SGAH approved for urticaria in February 2019 by the Drugs Controller General of India. Its major advantages are in terms of superior efficacy, lack of drug interactions and adverse effects, including sedation, compared to conventional SGAHs. The role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of CSU is well known. However, there is a shortage of data regarding the change in serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines following H1 antihistamines. We conducted this trial to evaluate the role of bilastine in cytokine modulation and autoimmunity, thereby explaining its role in modifying the disease process in CSU., Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted in a tertiary institute in Kolkata on patients aged 12 years and above with a CSU >6 months. These patients had an unsatisfactory response, as per the Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7), to previous antihistamine therapies in standard doses. Treatment effectiveness was determined by comparing the UAS7 at baseline with that at weeks 4, 8 and 12. Also, baseline serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-17 were compared with those at the end of the study, that is, 12 weeks., Results: Thirty patients who matched the inclusion criteria and signed informed consent were included in the study. At the end of 12 weeks, 10% of patients ( n = 3) achieved a complete treatment response (UAS = 0), whereas 43.33% of patients ( n = 13) were labelled as having well-controlled urticaria (UAS <6). At 12 weeks, the mean UAS7 score (6.47 ± 4.45) was statistically significant compared to the baseline score (25.47 ± 7.74). The mean values of serum IL-6 (pg/ml) and IL-17 (pg/ml) at baseline were 5.96 ± 5.24 pg/ml and 6.96 ± 5.97 pg/ml, respectively. At the end of treatment, that is, 3 months, the mean values were reduced to 4.61 ± 4.56 pg/ml and 5.08 ± 3.87 pg/ml. The reduction was statistically significant for both serum IL-6 ( P < 0.001) and IL-17 ( P < 0.0001)., Conclusion: We conclude that bilastine at a once-daily continuous dose of 40 mg for 3 months is safe and effective in CSU patients who are refractory to treatment at the standard doses of SGAHs. Improved symptomatic control with bilastine was also associated with better control over the inflammatory process, as suggested by the lowering of mean cytokine levels in our study., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2024 Indian Journal of Dermatology.)

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is unpredictable and can severely impair patients' quality of life. Patients with CSU need a convenient, user-friendly platform to complete patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on their mobile devices. CRUSE ® , the Chronic Urticaria Self Evaluation app, aims to address this unmet need., Methods: CRUSE ® was developed by an international steering committee of urticaria specialists. Priorities for the app based on recent findings in CSU were defined to allow patients to track and record their symptoms and medication use over time and send photographs. The CRUSE ® app collects patient data such as age, sex, disease onset, triggers, medication, and CSU characteristics that can be sent securely to physicians, providing real-time insights. Additionally, CRUSE ® contains PROMs to assess disease activity and control, which are individualised to patient profiles and clinical manifestations., Results: CRUSE ® was launched in Germany in March 2022 and is now available for free in 17 countries. It is adapted to the local language and displays a country-specific list of available urticaria medications. English and Ukrainian versions are available worldwide. From July 2022 to June 2023, 25,710 observations were documented by 2540 users; 72.7% were females, with a mean age of 39.6 years. At baseline, 93.7% and 51.3% of users had wheals and angioedema, respectively. Second-generation antihistamines were used in 74.0% of days., Conclusions: The initial data from CRUSE ® show the wide use and utility of effectively tracking patients' disease activity and control, paving the way for personalised CSU management., (© 2024 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.)

Objective : A frequent condition known as chronic urticaria (CU) is characterized by the appearance of wheals, angioedema, or both. CU lowers the quality of life and may also result in psychological discomfort. The literature survey revealed few studies dealing with depression and anxiety in these patients. Hence, Hamilton scores for depression and anxiety were used in this study to evaluate the incidence of depression and anxiety in chronic urticaria patients. Methodology: To evaluate CU patients' levels of depression and anxiety, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS) and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) were applied. Moreover, in a control group of thirty healthy volunteers, thirty CU patients were included in this study. It was essential to observe the patients' urticaria activity score, medications, age, gender, comorbidities, employment status, and income. When it came to levels of depression and anxiety, a comparison was made between the case group and the healthy group. Results: In the CU patients' group, the mean age was 26.9 years. The questionnaires showed that 14 (46%) subjects in the patient group had moderate to severe signs of anxiety, and 21 (70%) had moderate to severe symptoms of depression. Besides, in the control group,7 (23.3%) had moderate to severe signs of anxiety, and 8 (26.7%) had severe depression. Conclusion: According to the study, individuals with CU exhibit depression and anxiety symptoms more frequently than the control group. Therefore, the possibility of mental comorbidities should be considered when treating individuals with CU., (© 2023 Bangera, Singh, Godse, Patil, HBKU Press.)

Introduction: The integrated care pathways for atopic dermatitis (AD-ICPs) aim to bridge the gap between existing AD treatment evidence-based guidelines and expert opinion based on daily practice by offering a structured multidisciplinary plan for patient management of AD. ICPs have the potential to enhance guideline recommendations by combining interventions and aspects from different guidelines, integrating quality assurance, and describing co-ordination of care. Most importantly, patients can enter the ICPs at any level depending on AD severity, resources available in their country, and economic factors such as differences in insurance reimbursement systems., Methods: The GA 2 LEN ADCARE network and partners as well as all stakeholders, abbreviated as the AD-ICPs working group, were involved in the discussion and preparation of the AD ICPs during a series of subgroup workshops and meetings in years 2020 and 2021, after which the document was circulated within all GAL 2 EN ADCARE centres., Results: The AD-ICPs outline the diagnostic procedures, possible co-morbidities, different available treatment options including differential approaches for the pediatric population, and the role of the pharmacists and other stakeholders, as well as remaining unmet needs in the management of AD., Conclusion: The AD-ICPs provide a multidisciplinary plan for improved diagnosis, treatment, and patient feedback in AD management, as well as addressing critical unmet needs, including improved access to care, training specialists, implementation of educational programs, assessment on the impact of climate change, and fostering a personalised treatment approach. By focusing on these key areas, the initiative aims to pave the way for a brighter future in the management of AD., (© 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.)

Alopecia is a highly prevalent condition worldwide including in India. There are different types of alopecia with differing etiology, presentation, and hence treatment. Androgenetic alopecia represents the most common form of hair loss affecting male as well as female population termed as male and female pattern hair loss, respectively. Several treatment options are available for the treatment of alopecia with often unsatisfactory results resulting in psychological distress among such patients. Topical minoxidil is known to be effective in the treatment of alopecia. However, oral minoxidil is not currently approved for the treatment of alopecia. This expert consensus is prepared to provide guidance to the clinicians regarding the use of oral minoxidil in the treatment of alopecia. Extensive literature review was performed to prepare the draft consensus which was then revised based on the suggestions and comments from the experts. The final draft was circulated to the experts for review and approval. This consensus document provides overview of evidence related to oral minoxidil and consensus from the experts for its use in the treatment of minoxidil., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2023 International Journal of Trichology.)

Melasma, a chronic pigmentary skin condition mainly affecting the face, remains a challenge despite the availability of several options for treatment. Many melasma patients are not satisfied with treatment outcomes. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an anti-fibrinolytic drug has shown promising results in patients with melasma. Evidence from several clinical studies has surfaced on efficacy and tolerability of TXA in these patients. It can be used as monotherapy or adjuvant with other therapies. Currently, there is no published consensus or guideline document for its use in the treatment of melasma. TXA is available for oral use, topical use as well as an injection. In this article, a consensus of Indian experts is prepared based on the available literature and experience with use of oral TXA in melasma. This review article might help clinicians for use of oral TXA appropriately while treating melasma., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Dermatology.)

Urticaria is a common skin disorder. Chronic urticaria, i.e., the presence of symptoms for more than six weeks, is associated with a significant adverse impact on sleep, performance, quality of life, and financial status of the patients. Although several treatment options are available, the condition can be challenging to treat for many clinicians. Several updates have been published on the subject of urticaria and its management since the publication of an updated consensus statement in 2018 by Indian experts. The objective of this consensus statement is to summarize the updates and provide concise information, including classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria. Understanding and elimination of the underlying eliciting trigger are essential in all possible cases. The goal of pharmacological treatment is to provide symptomatic relief. Second-generation nonsedating H1 antihistamine continue to be recommended as the first-line treatment, the dose of which can be increased up to four times in patients not responding satisfactorily, in the second step. The role of omalizumab, cyclosporine, H2 antihistamines, and other options is also discussed., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Dermatology.)

There is a dearth of data regarding the safety and timing of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) vaccination of patients on immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapies. However, data from other vaccine trials may be extrapolated to get an idea regarding the recommendation of SARS-COV-2 vaccines. All the novel SARS-COV-2 vaccines are non-live, thus ensuring the safety of the vaccines. However, the vaccines may not be able to generate an equipotent immunogenic response in patients receiving immunotherapeutics, in comparison to those who are not. We have attempted to put forward certain statements, with respect to SARS-COV-2 vaccination of patients who are on treatment for different dermatological conditions. However, the risk-benefit ratio must be discussed between the patient and the physician, and the final call should be individualized., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Dermatology.)