Search

AIM: Aim of the study was to quantify the economic impact of PET/CT and contrast enhanced (c.e.) CT performed in a single session examination vs. stand-alone modalities in oncological patients. METHODS: One-hundred-forty-five cancer patients referred to both PET/CT and c.e. CT, to either stage (N.=46) or re-stage (N.=99) the disease, were included. Seventy-two/145 performed both studies in a single session (innovative method) and 73/145 in two different sessions (traditional method). The cost-minimization analysis was performed by evaluating: 1) institutional costs, data obtained by hospital accountability (staff, medical materials, equipment maintenance and depreciation, departments utilities); 2) patients costs, data obtained by a specific survey provided to patients (travel, food, accommodation costs, productivity loss). RESULTS: Economic data analysis showed that the costs for innovative method was lower than those of traditional method, both for Institution (106 € less per test) and for patient (21 € less per patient). The loss of productivity for patient and caregivers resulted lower for the innovative method than the traditional method (3 work-hour less per person). CONCLUSION: PET/CT and c.e. CT performed in a single session is more cost-effective than stand-alone modalities, by reducing both Institutional and patients costs. These advantages are mainly due to lower Institutional cost (single procedure) and to lower cost related to travel and housing.

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography introduction in the clinical management of patients with suspected recurrence of ovarian cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysisAim of this study was to evaluate the economic impact of the introduction of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the early detection of recurrent ovarian cancer through a cost-effectiveness analysis of different diagnostic strategies. Thirty-two consecutive patients with suspected ovarian cancer recurrence, studied by both contrast enhanced abdominal CT and PET/CT, were retrospectively included in the study. Three different diagnostic strategies were evaluated and compared: (1) CT only or baseline strategy; (2) PET/CT for negative CT or strategy A; (3) PET/CT for All or strategy B. For each one, expected costs, avoided surgery and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated to identify the most cost-effective strategy. The number of positive patients increased from baseline strategy (20/32) to strategy A and B (30/32 and 29/32 respectively). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography reoriented physician choice in 31% and 62% of patients (strategies A and B respectively). Strategy A is dominated by strategy B, which is more expensive (2909 Euro vs. 2958 Euro), but also more effective (3 cases of surgery avoided) and presents an ICER of 226.77 Euro per surgery avoided (range: 49.50-433.00 Euro). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography introduction in this population is cost-effective and allowed to redirect the clinical management of patients towards more appropriate therapeutic choices.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the economic impact of the introduction of positron emission tomography (PET) in the clinical management of patients with known or suspected lung cancer through a cost-effectiveness analysis of different diagnostic strategies. METHODS: In Italy, 75 patients with known or suspected lung cancer were included in the study. Three different diagnostic strategies were compared: 1) baseline or traditional strategy, i.e. computed tomography (CT) alone; 2) strategy A, i.e. PET for indefinite CT; 3) strategy B, i.e. PET for all. For each strategy expected costs and life expectancy, as measured by life year saved (LYS), were evaluated. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to identify the most effective strategy. RESULTS: Compared to the baseline strategy, the introduction of PET changed the clinical management in 40% of cases in strategy A and in 51% of cases in strategy B, with an optimization of the clinical management. Costs of strategy A (2 735.42 Euro) and strategy B (2 984.52 Euro) were, respectively, 8% and 18% higher than the baseline strategy (2 534.81 Euro). LYS was 2.04 and 2.64 for strategy A and B, which were, respectively, 4% and 35% higher than the baseline strategy (1.96 LYS). The ICERs were 2 507.63 Euro/LYS and 415.17 Euro/LYS for strategy A and B, respectively. Strategy A is dominated by strategy B, which is more expensive, but also more effective. CONCLUSION: In Italy, the introduction of PET in the clinical management of all patients with known or suspected lung cancer previously evaluated with CT is cost-effective and allows to gain 2.64 life years at an annual cost of about 415 Euro.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the economic impact of the introduction of positron emission tomography (PET) in the clinical management of patients with known or suspected lung cancer through a cost-effectiveness analysis of different diagnostic strategies. METHODS: In Italy, 75 patients with known or suspected lung cancer were included in the study. Three different diagnostic strategies were compared: 1) baseline or traditional strategy, i.e. computed tomography (CT) alone; 2) strategy A, i.e. PET for indefinite CT; 3) strategy B, i.e. PET for all. For each strategy expected costs and life expectancy, as measured by life year saved (LYS), were evaluated. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to identify the most effective strategy. RESULTS: Compared to the baseline strategy, the introduction of PET changed the clinical management in 40% of cases in strategy A and in 51% of cases in strategy B, with an optimization of the clinical management. Costs of strategy A (2 735.42 Euro) and strategy B (2 984.52 Euro) were, respectively, 8% and 18% higher than the baseline strategy (2 534.81 Euro). LYS was 2.04 and 2.64 for strategy A and B, which were, respectively, 4% and 35% higher than the baseline strategy (1.96 LYS). The ICERs were 2 507.63 Euro/LYS and 415.17 Euro/LYS for strategy A and B, respectively. Strategy A is dominated by strategy B, which is more expensive, but also more effective. CONCLUSION: In Italy, the introduction of PET in the clinical management of all patients with known or suspected lung cancer previously evaluated with CT is cost-effective and allows to gain 2.64 life years at an annual cost of about 415 Euro.

AIM: To determine prospectively from the referring physician's point of view the impact of F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-FDG PET) results on the management decisions in patients with known or suspected lung cancer. METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive patients (58 men, 17 women; age range, 33-82 years; mean age, 64 years) with a diagnosis of a pulmonary lesion, obtained by means of morphological imaging studies and/or cytological sampling, were included in the study. The patient population consisted of three groups: (A) patients (n=18) with a solitary lung nodule; (B) patients (n=37) with untreated lung cancer; and (C) patients (n=20) with treated lung cancer. All were referred for whole-body F-FDG PET within 15 days (mean, 11 days) of lung lesion detection. To determine whether and how PET findings could modify the treatment strategy, a questionnaire was sent to the referring physician before and after the PET results. With regard to the treatment strategy, four major options were recognized: (1) further diagnostic investigations; (2) medical therapy; (3) surgical treatment; (4) wait-and-see. For data analysis, intermodality changes, defined as changes between treatment strategies related to PET findings, were considered. RESULTS: Before the PET study, the planned management for the overall patient population was as follows: further diagnostic investigations in 44 cases (58%), medical therapy in 17 (23%), surgical treatment in nine (12%) and wait-and-see in five (7%). After the PET study, further diagnostic tools were indicated in 27 cases (36%), medical therapy in 17 (23%), surgical treatment in 28 (37%) and wait-and-see in three (4%). Relative to the initially planned strategy, changes in patient management after PET imaging occurred in 34 (45%) cases. Overall, the most relevant variation after PET concerned the surgical treatment strategy. The highest percentage (67%) of changes in management after PET was found in patients with a solitary pu

AIM: Increasing ageing of the population and tumor incidence, along with worldwide rationing of the resources for public health systems, spur the use of economic analyses for the choice of strategies and technologies in the assessment and management of cancer patients. Incidence and clinical managing of tumors vary in different countries even if positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) is becoming a routine clinical method for diagnosis, staging, treatment monitoring and follow-up in a variety of tumors. Available data indicate that PET can be considered a superior alternative or complementary tool to other well-established methods. However, in spite of the above and of the rapidly increasing number of PET centers in Europe, USA and Japan, only a few studies have dealt with some of the economic aspects raised by the clinical use of PET because of differences in values of reimbursements and health costs. The main aim of this study is to propose and discuss an economic model of analysis for PET applications in the field of detection and management of pulmonary tumors. METHODS: In this study 2 assessments were performed by decision tree analysis on the economic impact of the availability of PET on decision-making processes for 2 conditions: solitary pulmonary nodules assessment and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) staging. In order to define a methodology consistent with the system of reimbursement and the prevalent clinical views of the Italian National Health Service, data on costs, death probability, and life expectancy were gathered from the literature and from the Italian system of reimbursement (ROD-DRGs). RESULTS: The results of the cost minimization analysis demonstrate that the use of PET in the diagnostic path for the workup of patients with SPN reduces the overall diagnostic costs, by approximately 50 Euro per patient, by reducing inappropriate invasive diagnostic investigation and their complications. The results of t

Emission tomography techniques and, in particular, positron emission tomography (PET) enable the in vivo study of several physiological and neurochemical variables in human subjects using methods originally developed for quantitative autoradiography. In particular, PET allows one to evaluate in human subjects: (a) the effect of specific neurochemical challenges on regional brain function at rest or under activation; (b) the activity of neurotransmitters and the regional expression of specific molecular targets during pathology including their modulation by drug treatment; (c) the kinetics of drug disposition and activity directly in the target organ. This is of primary interest in the field of biological psychiatry and in psychoactive drugs development, where it is particularly difficult to reproduce human diseases using animal models in view of the peculiarity of this field and the large heterogeneity of each psychiatric illness also inside the same clinical definition. The aim of this paper is to review the principal strategies and the main results of the use of PET in psychopharmacology.