Search

Data from seven research resource flocks across Australia were combined to provide accurate estimates of genetic correlations among production traits in Merino sheep. The flocks represented contemporary Australian Merino fine, medium and broad wool strains over the past 30 years. Over 110,000 records were available for analysis for each of the major wool traits, and 50,000 records for reproduction and growth traits with over 2700 sires and 25,000 dams. Individual models developed from the single trait analyses were extended to the various combinations of two-trait models to obtain genetic correlations among six wool traits [clean fleece weight (CFW), greasy fleece weight, fibre diameter (FD), yield, coefficient of variation of fibre diameter and standard deviation of fibre diameter], four growth traits [birth weight, weaning weight, yearling weight (YWT), and hogget weight] and four reproduction traits [fertility, litter size, lambs born per ewe joined, lambs weaned per ewe joined (LW/EJ)]. This study has provided for the first time a comprehensive matrix of genetic correlations among these 14 wool, growth and reproduction traits. The large size of the data set has also provided estimates with very low standard errors. A moderate positive genetic correlation was observed between CFW and FD (0.29 +/- 0.02). YWT was positively correlated with CFW (0.23 +/- 0.04), FD (0.17 +/- 0.04) and LWEJ (0.58 +/- 0.06), while LW/EJ was negatively correlated with CFW (-0.26 +/- 0.05) and positively correlated with FD (0.06 +/- 0.04) and LS (0.68 +/- 0.04). These genetic correlations, together with the estimates of heritability and other parameters provide the basis for more accurate prediction of outcomes in complex sheep-breeding programmes designed to improve several traits.

The involvement, if any, of prolactin in the relationship between appetite and ovulation rate was studied in mice. Injections of 0, 50, 100 or 150 micrograms of bromocriptine were given twice-daily to 46-day-old virgin mice for a minimum of 15 days. Between days 5 and 12 of treatment, mice receiving either 50, 100 or 150 micrograms of bromocriptine consumed 3.1, 4.3 and 6.2 g more food, respectively, than did mice in the control group. Liveweights and liveweight gain, however, were unaffected by bromocriptine injections. From day 0 to 12 of treatment mice grew 0.16, 0.15, 0.21 and 0.16 g/day in the 0, 50, 100 and 150 micrograms bromocriptine groups, respectively, (P greater than 0.05). Plasma prolactin concentrations were suppressed, but ovulation rates were similar in the 50, 100 and 150 micrograms bromocriptine groups compared with the control (median prolactin concentrations and mean ovulation rates were 32.9, 32.5 and 31.6 ng/ml and 14.4, 15.1 and 15.7 ova, respectively, compared with 217.2 ng/ml and 14.9 ova in the control). The results do not support the hypothesis that prolactin directly mediates a relationship between appetite and ovulation rate in the post-pubertal mouse.

SummaryFemale reproductive performance is reported in mice selected for ten generations for one of three criteria: either appetite (A), fat percentage (F) or total lean mass (P). For each criterion lines were selected for high (H) or low (L) performance, with contemporary unselected controls (C). In theAandPlines, litter size changed in the direction of the selected criterion, the changes being larger and more rapidly established in theAthan in thePlines. At generation 10, the differences in litter size between high and low lines were 2·6 live young born in theAlines, and 1·0 live young born in thePlines. The differences in 6-week weight between the high and low lines were 3·5 g in theAlines, 6·5 g in thePlines. Changes in ovulation rate were the primary reason for changes in litter size, the differences between the high and low lines being 3·8 corpora lutea for theAlines, and 3·1 corpora lutea for thePlines. Fitting body weight at mating as a covariate within lines in the analysis of ovulation rate and live foetus number removed the differences between the high and low selectedPlines, but not those in theAlines. The high and low selectedAandPlines did not differ in prenatal survival. There were no consistent differences in litter size, ovulation rate or pre-natal survival in theFlines.