I. INTRODUCTION 464 II. RELEVANT TREATIES & LEGAL MECHANISMS 466 A. International Law & International Treaties 466 B. Import & Export Controls 473 III. UKRAINE IN THE CONTEXT OF IRAQ [...], Russia's recent invasion of Ukraine poses a serious threat to Ukraine's cultural heritage. With numerous reports that Russian soldiers are looting Ukraine's movable cultural heritage, legal action is required to prevent the successful sale and illegal trafficking of these stolen artifacts. This Note examines the relevant legal tools available to prevent this trade. First, the paper examines relevant international treaties, including the 1970 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Convention and 1954 Hague Convention, and the benefits and potential challenges of using export and import controls to address illicit trade of cultural property. Next, the Note examines the approach to preventing trade in stolen cultural property from Syria and Iraq. However, the Note ultimately finds that the U.N.based approach taken in those conflicts cannot be applied to Ukraine. While relevant actors have made numerous international commitments to protect cultural property, these commitments are largely non-binding and cannot be used to compel countries to enact domestic laws. Therefore, major nations must pursue unilateral import and export controls to prevent illicit trade in Ukrainian cultural goods. Finally, this Note addresses potential conflicts with World Trade Organization (WTO) obligations. Import and export controls violate the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)'s Article XI prohibition on trade bans or quotas. Prior import and export bans on Syrian and Iraqi cultural property were enacted pursuant to a binding U.N. Security Council Resolution, which qualified these measures for the GATT's Article XXI(c) national security exception. Because binding U.N.-based action is not available to protect Ukrainian cultural property, this Note explores other GATT exceptions that could apply. Ultimately, the Note finds that the GATT's Article XX(f) exception for protecting national treasures provides the strongest legal basis for WTO parties to enact measures banning illicit trade in Ukrainian cultural property without violating their WTO obligations.