Search

Objectives: Chronic hepatitis C infection incidence and prevalence are high in Egypt and represent a major health burden. Hepatitis C virus infection can affect graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection among this special group was difficult during the interferon era; however, with advances in direct-acting antivirals, treatment outcomes have become more promising., Materials and Methods: This is a pilot, observational, single-center, one arm study that included 50 kidney transplant recipients seen at the Mansoura (Egypt) Urology and Nephrology Center. Patients were consented to receive a sofosbuvir-based regimen as all had creatinine clearance of greater than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2., Results: All patients achieved rapid virologic responses 4 weeks after starting treatment. Forty-nine of 50 patients achieved 12-week and 24-week sustained viral responses. Six patients had increased serum creatinine levels. Four graft biopsies were performed. Anemia was the most common adverse effect among the patients who were maintained on ribavirin., Conclusions: Treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection has become easier and safe with the advance of new direct-acting antivirals.

Direct antivirals showed dramatic response in hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication, but their effect on extrahepatic manifestations is still unclear. A 49-year-old woman was referred to us suffering from lower limb edema and frothy urine. Renal biopsy was done and she was diagnosed with HCV-related membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with cryoglobulinemia. Treatment with interferon plus ribavirin, steroid, and cyclophosphamide was tried but failed. After introduction of a sofosbuvir-based regimen to the treatment, sustained virologic response was achieved and nephrotic syndrome remission was induced successfully. We could conclude that HCV-related membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with cryoglobulinemia could be treated successfully with immunosuppressive drugs plus sofosbuvir and dacalatasvir.

Objectives: New-onset diabetes mellitus after transplant is a common complication in renal allograft recipients. Recently, a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus has been reported in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus. The association between hepatitis C and diabetes mellitus is well demonstrated in the general population, but some controversy still exists. This work aimed to study the effect of pretransplant hepatitis C virus on the development of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplant in Egyptian living-donor renal allotransplant recipients., Materials and Methods: This retrospective single center study included 913 kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted at Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center between 2000 and 2010. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to their hepatitis C virus serology and diabetic status., Results: Pretransplant dialysis duration and number of blood transfusion units were statistically significant among both viremic and nonviremic groups. With respect to induction therapy, a highly statistical significance was observed between the 4 groups regarding presence and type of adjuvant therapy (P < .001). With respect to maintenance immunosuppression, high statistically significant results were observed regarding steroid and rapamycin between the 4 groups (P < .001) with lower significance regarding mycophenolate mofetil (P = .04) but no significance regarding azathioprine, cyclosporine, or tacrolimus therapy. Incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplant was statistically higher in the viremic than nonviremic group (P < .001)., Conclusions: There was a positive correlation between incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplant and positive pretransplant hepatitis C virus status.

Hemodialysis (HD) patients are subjected to a number of physical and mental stresses. Physicians might be unaware of some of these problems. We assessed our patients' opinion about the service provided at the dialysis unit. Our unit has 89 patients on HD. A questionnaire exploring our patients' opinion relative to the service provided was prepared. The patients were asked to fill-in the questionnaire in a confidential manner. Questionnaires were then collected and examined while unaware of patient identities. Sixty-nine patients (77.5%) responded to the questionnaire. Eight patients (11.6%) revealed their names on the questionnaire. According to the questionnaire, the patients were asked to assess the service of each service by choosing one of the following grades: "excellent," "mediocre" or "bad." For the whole group of contributing patients, there were 563 "excellent," 85 "mediocre" and five "bad" choices in addition to 37 blank "no comment" choices. Food service had the least percentage (68%) of evaluation as "excellent," while doctor' performance got the highest excellent evaluation (85.5%). Thirty-five patients (50.7%) added further comment(s). An audit meeting was conducted to discuss these results. Exploring the opinion of patients on HD might uncover some areas of dissatisfaction and help in improving the provided service. We recommend widespread usage of questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction as well as to assess other health-care aspects.