Search

Background: Patient centred care has a correlation to effectiveness of patient engagement, patient care, and perceived quality of care. Even in the emergency room, awareness of diagnosis and treatment plan is a critical component in every doctor-patient interface as it enhances patient-centred care. This study aims to assess awareness of diagnosis and treatment plan among patients in the accident and emergency department. Methodology: This is a cross-sectional study conducted at the accident and emergency department of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital. Result: One hundred and ninety-seven respondents were recruited into this study comprising of 51.3% males and 48.8% females. Most 86.8% of the respondents were aware of their diagnosis, of which 91.8% knew the accurate diagnosis. Majority 84.8% of the respondents were aware of the treatment, while 68.8% of the respondents were aware of the names of the medications, most of the respondents 59.4% had no knowledge of the side effects of the medications. The majority, 61.4% were involved in the management decision. No significant relationship existed between the socio-demographic characteristics and knowledge of diagnosis and treatment plan. Conclusion: The chaotic and overcrowded nature of the accident and emergency department should not hamper the delivery of patient centred care. Although, findings obtained from this study reveal that majority of the respondents are aware of their diagnosis and treatment plan, a portion of respondents do not understand their plan of care; this indicates the need for further studies to identify interventions that would ensure that gaps in the physician -patient communication are filled as this optimizes patients' satisfaction of care received, gives better sense of control of their total situation and better quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to assess the impact on quality of life from informing patients with cancer of their diagnosis and disease status. Method We searched the follow databases, PubMed, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), PsycINFO, WEB OF SCIENCE, Embase, CBM (Chinese Biomedical Literature database), WANFANG database (Chinese Medicine Premier), and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), using the following terms: neoplasm, cancer, tumor, tumor, carcinoma, disclosure, truth telling, breaking bad news, knowledge, knowing, awareness, quality of life, QOL. Pairs of reviewers independently screened documents and extracted the data, and the meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.0 software. Results Eleven thousand seven hundred forty records retrieved from the databases and 23 studies were included in the final analysis. A meta-analysis revealed that there were no differences in either the general quality of life and symptoms of fatigue, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, and diarrhea, between informed and uniformed cancer patients (P > 0.05). There were also no differences found between the patient groups in physical function, role function, cognitive activity, and emotional function (P > 0.05). In terms of vitality, patients who were completely informed about their diagnosis showed higher vitality than uniformed patients. Uninformed patients seemed to have lower social function scores. Between partly informed and uninformed cancer patients, no differences were found in their general quality of life, function domains, and disease-related symptoms (P > 0.05). Conclusion Informing cancer patients of their diagnosis may not have a detrimental effect on their quality of life. Trial registration CRD42017060073 .

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the impact on quality of life from informing patients with cancer of their diagnosis and disease status.Method: We searched the follow databases, PubMed, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), PsycINFO, WEB OF SCIENCE, Embase, CBM (Chinese Biomedical Literature database), WANFANG database (Chinese Medicine Premier), and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), using the following terms: neoplasm, cancer, tumor, tumor, carcinoma, disclosure, truth telling, breaking bad news, knowledge, knowing, awareness, quality of life, QOL. Pairs of reviewers independently screened documents and extracted the data, and the meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.0 software.Results: Eleven thousand seven hundred forty records retrieved from the databases and 23 studies were included in the final analysis. A meta-analysis revealed that there were no differences in either the general quality of life and symptoms of fatigue, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, and diarrhea, between informed and uniformed cancer patients (P > 0.05). There were also no differences found between the patient groups in physical function, role function, cognitive activity, and emotional function (P > 0.05). In terms of vitality, patients who were completely informed about their diagnosis showed higher vitality than uniformed patients. Uninformed patients seemed to have lower social function scores. Between partly informed and uninformed cancer patients, no differences were found in their general quality of life, function domains, and disease-related symptoms (P > 0.05).Conclusion: Informing cancer patients of their diagnosis may not have a detrimental effect on their quality of life.Trial Registration: CRD42017060073 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]