Search

Prediction is the making of statements, usually probabilistic, about future events based on current information. Retrodiction is the making of statements about past events based on current information. We present the foundations of quantum retrodiction and highlight its intimate connection with the Bayesian interpretation of probability. The close link with Bayesian methods enables us to explore controversies and misunderstandings about retrodiction that have appeared in the literature. To be clear, quantum retrodiction is universally applicable and draws its validity directly from conventional predictive quantum theory coupled with Bayes' theorem., Comment: New version, accepted by journal: Symmetry

The results of experiments in quantum mechanics can be predicted correctly either by assigning a forward-evolving state to the system based on the preparation outcome or by assigning a state that evolves backwards in time based on the measurement outcome. The latter picture admits some retrocausality without allowing messages to be sent at a faster speed than that of light. This retrocausality allows some standard quantum paradoxes to be examined from a different viewpoint. It also allows closed causal cycles to be examined in the context of laboratory experiments. For a particular experiment, we find agreement with the principle that inconsistent causal loops have zero probability of occurring, that is, only self-consistent loops can occur.

We show explicitly how the causal arrow of time that follows from quantum mechanics has already been inserted at a deeper level by the choice of normalisation conditions. This prohibits information being sent backwards in time but does not determine a time direction for state propagation.

We use the impossibility of sending information faster than light to show that it is impossible to distinguish between various types of laser cavity field state, such as a Fock state of uncertain energy and any superposition of Fock states of unknown free evolution time, by means of the physically measurable properties of the laser beam. Superpositions can include coherent states, squeezed states and cat states, indeed any pure intracavity state will produce the characteristic properties of the beam such as intrinsic phase coherence.

The results of experiments designed to measure the operational phase cosine and sine variances of weak states of light disagree with the variances predicted by canonical phase formalisms. As these variances are fundamental manifestations of the quantum nature of phase, it is important to be able to measure the canonical variances also. A recent suggestion to do so, based on the use of a two-component probe, involves the difficult preparation of exotic states of light which have not yet been produced. In this paper we show how the variances can be measured with simple coherent state inputs. The retrodictive formalism of quantum mechanics provides useful insight into the physics involved.

A construction of covariant quantum phase observables, for Hamiltonians with a finite number of energy eigenvalues, has been recently given by D. Arsenovic et al. [Phys. Rev. A 85, 044103 (2012)]. For Hamiltonians generating periodic evolution, we show that this construction is just a simple rescaling of the known canonical 'time' or 'age' observable, with the period T rescaled to 2\pi. Further, for Hamiltonians generating quasiperiodic evolution, we note that the construction leads to a phase observable having several undesirable features, including (i) having a trivially uniform probability density for any state of the system, (ii) not reducing to the periodic case in an appropriate limit, and (iii) not having any clear generalisation to an infinite energy spectrum. In contrast, we note that a covariant time observable has been previously defined for such Hamiltonians, which avoids these features. We also show how this 'quasiperiodic' time observable can be represented as the well-defined limit of a sequence of periodic time observables., Comment: 4 pages, accepted version

We examine the phase relationships between different packets of a beam of light emitted from a cavity through a partially transmitting mirror. We find that the beam has a pronounced phase coherence even when the intracavity field has a completely indeterminate phase such as, for example, when it is in a pure photon number state. In this case, the phase coherence can be directly attributed to entanglement caused by the partially transmitting mirror and, even though the external light has phase coherence, it has no identifiable phase. Consequently there is no phase diffusion but there is diffusion of the phase difference between a packet and the intracavity field. Remarkably, we find that the phase coherence of the beam is almost independent of the intracavity state, provided this has a reasonably narrow number-state distribution about a large mean value.

We extend and generalize previous work on the interference of light from independent cavities that began with the suggestion of Pfleegor and Mandel [Phys. Rev. 159, 1084 (1967)] that their observed interference of laser beams should not be associated too closely with particular states of the beams but more with the detection process itself. In particular we examine how the detection of interference induces a nonrandom-phase difference between internal cavity states with initial random phases for a much broader range of such states than has previously been considered. We find that a subsequent interference measurement should give results consistent with the induced phase difference. The inclusion of more cavities in the interference measurements enables the construction in principle of a laboratory in the sense used by Aharonov and Susskind, made up of cavity fields that can serve as frames of phase reference. We also show reasonably simply how intrinsic phase coherence of a beam of light leaking from a single cavity arises for any internal cavity state, even a photon number state. Although the work presented here may have some implications for the current controversy over whether or not a typical laboratory laser produces a coherent state, it is notmore » the purpose of this paper to enter this controversy; rather it is to examine the interesting quantum physics that arises for cavities with more general internal states.« less

We derive a master equation describing the evolution of a quantum system subjected to a sequence of observations. These measurements occur randomly at a given rate and can be of a very general form. As an example, we analyse the effects of these measurements on the evolution of a two-level atom driven by an electromagnetic field. For the associated quantum trajectories we find Rabi oscillations, Zeno-effect type behaviour and random telegraph evolution spawned by mini quantum jumps as we change the rates and strengths of measurement., 14 pages and 8 figures, Optics Communications in press

All compositions of a mixed-state density operator are equivalent for the prediction of the probabilities of future outcomes of measurements. For retrodiction, however, this is not the case. The retrodictive formalism of quantum mechanics provides a criterion for deciding that some compositions are fictional. Fictional compositions do not contain preparation device operators, that is operators corresponding to states that could have been prepared. We apply this to Molmer's controversial conjecture that optical coherences in laser light are a fiction and find agreement with his conjecture. We generalise Molmer's derivation of the interference between two lasers to avoid the use of any fictional states. We also examine another possible method for discriminating between conerent states and photon number states in laser light and find that it does not work, with the equivalence for prediction saved by entanglement.

Although it has been known for some time that quantum mechanics can be formulated in a way that treats prediction and retrodiction on an equal footing, most attention in engineering quantum states has been devoted to predictive states, that is, states associated with the a preparation event. Retrodictive states, which are associated with a measurement event and propagate backwards in time, are also useful, however. In this paper we show how any retrodictive state of light that can be written to a good approximation as a finite superposition of photon number states can be generated by an optical multiport device. The composition of the state is adjusted by controlling predictive coherent input states. We show how the probability of successful state generation can be optimised by adjusting the multiport device and also examine a versatile configuration that is useful for generating a range of states., Comment: 14 pages, 1 figure

We show that the eight-port interferometer used by Noh, Foug\`{e}res, and Mandel [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 71}, 2579 (1993)] to measure their operational phase distribution of light can also be used to measure the canonical phase distribution of weak optical fields, where canonical phase is defined as the complement of photon number. A binomial reference state is required for this purpose, which we show can be obtained to an excellent degree of approximation from a suitably squeezed state. The proposed method requires only photodetectors that can distinguish among zero, one and more than one photons and is not particularly sensitive to photodetector imperfections., Comment: 8 Pages, 4 figures

Retrodictive quantum states are states that propagate backwards in time from a measurement event. Although retrodictive quantum mechanics appears to be very different from the usual predictive formalism, in that propagation of states into the past appears to violate causality, this is not so. Indeed causality is not manifest in the time direction of propagation of quantum states at all. Instead, causality is ensured by the different normalization conditions applied to the preparation and measurement device operators. It is this difference that introduces the arrow of time into quantum mechanics. Retrodictive states are useful for applications such as measurement, predictive quantum state engineering and quantum communication. Here we show how any optical retrodictive state that can be expressed to a good approximation in a finite‐dimensional Hilbert space can be generated from predictive coherent states, a lossless multiport device and photodetectors. The composition of the retrodictive state can be contr...

A which-way measurement destroys the twin-slit interference pattern. Bohr argued that distinguishing between two slits a distance s apart gives the particle a random momentum transfer \wp of order h/s. This was accepted for more than 60 years, until Scully, Englert and Walther (SEW) proposed a which-way scheme that, they claimed, entailed no momentum transfer. Storey, Tan, Collett and Walls (STCW) in turn proved a theorem that, they claimed, showed that Bohr was right. This work reviews and extends a recent proposal [Wiseman, Phys. Lett. A 311, 285 (2003)] to resolve the issue using a weak-valued probability distribution for momentum transfer, P_wv(\wp). We show that P_wv(\wp) must be wider than h/6s. However, its moments can still be zero because P_wv(\wp) is not necessarily positive definite. Nevertheless, it is measurable in a way understandable to a classical physicist. We introduce a new measure of spread for P_wv(\wp): half of the unit-confidence interval, and conjecture that it is never less than h/4s. For an idealized example with infinitely narrow slits, the moments of P_wv(\wp) and of the momentum distributions are undefined unless a process of apodization is used. We show that by considering successively smoother initial wave functions, successively more moments of both P_wv(\wp) and the momentum distributions become defined. For this example the moments of P_wv(\wp) are zero, and these are equal to the changes in the moments of the momentum distribution. We prove that this relation holds for schemes in which the moments of P_wv(\wp) are non-zero, but only for the first two moments. We also compare these moments to those of two other momentum-transfer distributions and \hat{p}_f-\hat{p}_i. We find agreement between all of these, but again only for the first two moments., 14 pages, 6 figures, submitted to J. Opt. B

We use retrodictive quantum theory to analyse two-photon quantum imaging systems. The formalism is particularly suitable for calculating conditional probability distributions., 5 pages, 3 figures

Most methods for experimentally reconstructing the quantum state of light involve determining a quasiprobability distribution such as the Wigner function. In this paper we present a scheme for measuring individual density matrix elements in the photon number state representation. Remarkably, the scheme is simple, involving two beam splitters and a reference field in a coherent state., Comment: 6 pages and 1 figure

The conventional postulate for the probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics is asymmetric in preparation and measurement, making retrodiction reliant on inference by use of Bayes' theorem. Here, a more fundamental symmetric postulate is presented, from which both predictive and retrodictive probabilities emerge immediately, even where measurement devices more general than those usually considered are involved. It is shown that the new postulate is perfectly consistent with the conventional postulate., Comment: 25 pages, No figures

We use retrodictive quantum theory to describe cavity field measurements by successive atomic detections in the micromaser. We calculate the state of the micromaser cavity field prior to detection of sequences of atoms in either the excited or ground state, for atoms that are initially prepared in the excited state. This provides the POM elements, which describe such sequences of measurements., Comment: 20 pages, 4(8) figures

In the Jaynes-Cummings model a two-level atom interacts with a single-mode electromagnetic field. Quantum mechanics predicts collapses and revivals in the probability that a measurement will show the atom to be excited at various times after the initial preparation of the atom and field. In retrodictive quantum mechanics we seek the probability that the atom was prepared in a particular state given the initial state of the field and the outcome of a later measurement on the atom. Although this is not simply the time reverse of the usual predictive problem, we demonstrate in this paper that retrodictive collapses and revivals also exist. We highlight the differences between predictive and retrodictive evolutions and describe an interesting situation where the prepared state is essentially unretrodictable., Comment: 15 pages, 3 (5) figures

We derive the master equation that governs the evolution of the measured state backwards in time in an open system. This allows us to determine probabilities for a given set of preparation events from the results of subsequent measurements, which has particular relevance to quantum communication., Comment: 14 pages, no figures

Measurement of a quantum system provides information concerning the state in which it was prepared. In this paper we show how the retrodictive formalism can be used to evaluate the probability associated with any one of a given set of preparation events. We illustrate our method by calculating the retrodictive density operator for a two-level atom coupled to the electromagnetic field., 39 pages, 4(12) figures

A generalized spin measurement, as opposed to a projective measurement, can produce interesting effects such as the weak Zeno effect (Cresser et al 2006 Opt. Commun. 264 352). In the weak limit a generalized spin measurement can also lead to surprising weak values (Aharonov et al 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1351). In this paper we show explicitly how a generalized spin measurement can be realized physically by entangling the spin to be measured with a pointer spin. Adjustment of the interaction time allows any amount of generalization to be achieved, ranging from a projective measurement to the limit of a very weak measurement.

20 pages.-- Presented at the 2005 European Quantum Electronics Conference: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=01567455, The states of linear momentum that satisfy the equality in the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for position and momentum, that is the intelligent states, are also the states that minimize the uncertainty product for position and momentum. The corresponding uncertainty relation for angular momentum and angular position, however, is more complicated and the intelligent states need not be the minimum uncertainty product states. In this paper, we investigate the differences between the intelligent and the minimum uncertainty product states for the angular case by means of instructive approximations, a numerical terative search and the exact solution. We find that these differences can be quite significant for particular values of angular position uncertainty and indeed may be amenable to experimental measurement with the present technology.

The well-known Olbers paradox argument precludes static model universes in which the stars have always shone. In such universes there would be no difference between day and night. This paper shows than an expanding Eddington–Lematire universe in which stars have been radiating indefinitely can also be rejected on similar grounds. Just as the static model can be saved by assuming that the stars have been shining for only the last 10 10 yr of the life of the Universe (Bonnor), so too can the Eddington–Lemaitre model.

Can a single atom coherently excited by on-resonance laser radiation generate a random telegraph signal with frequent periods of darkness in the fluorescence radiation, reflecting the quantum jumps of the atomic transitions? Erber and Putterman1 have proposed that such a random telegraph, predicted earlier2 for incoherent excitation, persists when the excitation is coherent and resonant with the unperturbed atomic transition frequencies. They argue that such an atomic telegraph is cryptographically equivalent to an infinite computer in its ability to generate random numbers, and would provide new tests of basic quantum theory. Here we argue that any periods of darkness in the light emitted by a coherently driven atom excited on resonance must be exceedingly rare.