1. Accuracy of the Safer Dx Instrument to Identify Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care.
- Author
-
Al-Mutairi A, Meyer AN, Thomas EJ, Etchegaray JM, Roy KM, Davalos MC, Sheikh S, and Singh H
- Subjects
- Diagnostic Tests, Routine standards, Humans, Medical Records, Patient Safety standards, Patient Safety statistics & numerical data, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Texas, Diagnostic Errors statistics & numerical data, Primary Health Care standards, Quality Improvement
- Abstract
Importance: Diagnostic errors are common and harmful, but difficult to define and measure. Measurement of diagnostic errors often depends on retrospective medical record reviews, frequently resulting in reviewer disagreement., Objectives: We aimed to test the accuracy of an instrument to help detect presence or absence of diagnostic error through record reviews., Design: We gathered questions from several previously used instruments for diagnostic error measurement, then developed and refined our instrument. We tested the accuracy of the instrument against a sample of patient records (n = 389), with and without previously identified diagnostic errors (n = 129 and n = 260, respectively)., Results: The final version of our instrument (titled Safer Dx Instrument) consisted of 11 questions assessing diagnostic processes in the patient-provider encounter and a main outcome question to determine diagnostic error. In comparison with the previous sample, the instrument yielded an overall accuracy of 84 %, sensitivity of 71 %, specificity of 90 %, negative predictive value of 86 %, and positive predictive value of 78 %. All 11 items correlated significantly with the instrument's error outcome question (all p values ≤ 0.01). Using factor analysis, the 11 questions clustered into two domains with high internal consistency (initial diagnostic assessment, and performance and interpretation of diagnostic tests) and a patient factor domain with low internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficients 0.93, 0.92, and 0.38, respectively)., Conclusions: The Safer Dx Instrument helps quantify the likelihood of diagnostic error in primary care visits, achieving a high degree of accuracy for measuring their presence or absence. This instrument could be useful to identify high-risk cases for further study and quality improvement.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF