Search

AimsThe effect of statins on risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalization and HF death remains uncertain. We aimed to establish whether statins reduce major HF events.Methods and resultsWe searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled endpoint statin trials from 1994 to 2014. Collaborating trialists provided unpublished data from adverse event reports. We included primary- and secondary-prevention statin trials with >1000 participants followed for >1 year. Outcomes consisted of first non-fatal HF hospitalization, HF death and a composite of first non-fatal HF hospitalization or HF death. HF events occurring

Aims: Patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are often treated with calcium channel blockers (CCBs), although the safety of CCBs in these patients is uncertain. We aimed to investigate the association between CCB use and clinical outcomes in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF; CCBs were examined overall, as well as by subtype (dihydropyridine and non‐dihydropyridine). Methods and results: We pooled individual patient data from four large HFpEF/HFmrEF trials. The association between CCB use and outcomes was assessed. Among the 16 954 patients included, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 56.8%, and 13 402 (79.0%) had HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%). Altogether, 5874 patients (34.6%) received a CCB (87.6% dihydropyridines). Overall, the risks of death and HF hospitalization were not higher in patients treated with a CCB, particularly dihydropyridines. The risk of pump failure death was significantly lower (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.96), while the risk of stroke was higher (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06–1.50) in patients treated with a CCB compared to those not. These risks remained different in patients treated and not treated with a CCB after adjustment for other prognostic variables. Although the majority of patients were treated with dihydropyridine CCBs, the pattern of outcomes was broadly similar for both dihydropyridine and non‐dihydropyridine CCBs. Conclusion: Although this is an observational analysis of non‐randomized treatment, there was no suggestion that CCBs were associated with worse HF outcomes. Indeed, CCB use was associated with a lower incidence of pump failure death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Influenza vaccination and cardiovascular events in patients with ischaemic heart disease and heart failure: A meta-analysis. B This article refers to 'Influenza vaccination and cardiovascular events in patients with ischaemic heart disease and heart failure: A meta-analysis' by D. Modin I et al i ., published in this issue on pages 1685-1692. b Annual influenza epidemics are estimated to cause between 290 000-650 000 respiratory deaths per year - however, this estimate does not include cardiovascular (CV) deaths.[1] Influenza infection is associated with increased risk of CV events, particularly among individuals at high CV risk.[2] Multiple pathophysiological mechanisms have been proposed to explain the associated increase in CV outcomes in individuals with influenza infection, such as atherosclerotic plaque rupture and an increased risk of atherothrombosis (secondary to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines resulting in a pro-thrombotic milieu, influx of inflammatory cells, plaque destabilization, and endothelial dysfunction), increased metabolic demand due to sympathetic activation (leading to tachycardia and hypoxaemia, exacerbating supply-demand mismatch), or by direct viral effect or triggering of myocarditis.[[3]] Influenza vaccination (IV) is widely acknowledged as the most effective way to prevent seasonal influenza, reduce disease severity, and lower the incidence of complications and deaths.[1] It is, therefore, intuitive that IV might reduce the risk of CV events in at-risk patients, although until recently randomized controlled trials (RCTs) specifically addressing this hypothesis were small and varied in quality. Five of the six trials included patients with IHD, while the recently published Influenza Vaccine to Prevent Adverse Vascular Events (IVVE) trial included patients with HF.[6] The follow-up duration ranged from 10 to 36 months. [Extracted from the article]

Aims: The aim of this study was to examine the association between patient‐reported symptoms and the extent of pulmonary congestion in acute heart failure (AHF). Methods and results: In this prospective, observational study, patient‐reported symptoms were assessed at baseline using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score (KCCQ‐TSS) (range 0–100; 0 worst) in patients hospitalized for AHF. In a subset, patient‐reported dyspnoea at rest and on exertion was examined (range 0–10; 10 worst) at baseline. In addition, 4‐zone lung ultrasound (LUS) was performed at baseline at the time of echocardiography. B‐lines were quantified offline, blinded to clinical findings, by a core laboratory. Chest X‐ray (CXR) and physical examination findings were collected from the medical records. Among 322 patients (mean age 72, 60% men, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 39%) with AHF, the median KCCQ‐TSS score was 33 (interquartile range 18–48). Worse KCCQ‐TSS was associated with worse New York Heart Association class, dyspnoea at rest and on exertion, and peripheral oedema (p trend <0.001 for all). However, KCCQ‐TSS was not associated with the extent of pulmonary congestion, as assessed by the number of B‐lines on LUS, or findings on CXR, or physical examination (p trend >0.25 for all). Similarly, KCCQ‐TSS was not significantly associated with echocardiographic markers of left ventricular filling pressure, pulmonary pressure or with N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide level. Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized for AHF, at baseline, KCCQ‐TSS was not associated with pulmonary congestion assessed by LUS, CXR, or physical examination. These findings suggest that the profound reduction in KCCQ‐TSS in patients with AHF may not be solely explained by pulmonary congestion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: In patients at high risk of heart failure following myocardial infarction (MI) as a result of residual left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan may result in a greater attenuation of adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling than renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibition alone, due to increased levels of substrates for neprilysin with vasodilatory, anti‐hypertrophic, anti‐fibrotic, and sympatholytic effects. Methods: We designed a randomized, double‐blinded, active‐comparator trial to examine the effect of sacubitril/valsartan to the current standard of care in reducing adverse LV remodelling in patients with asymptomatic LVSD following MI. Eligible patients were ≥3 months following MI, had an LV ejection fraction ≤40% as measured by echocardiography, were New York Heart Association functional classification I, tolerant of an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker at equivalent dose of ramipril 2.5 mg twice daily or greater, and taking a beta‐blocker unless contraindicated or intolerant. Patients were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan (target dose 97/103 mg twice daily) or valsartan (target dose 160 mg twice daily). The primary endpoint will be change in LV end‐systolic volume indexed for body surface area measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging over 52 weeks from randomization. Secondary endpoints include other magnetic resonance imaging‐based metrics of LV remodelling, biomarkers associated with LV remodelling and neurohumoral activation, and change in patient well‐being assessed using a patient global assessment questionnaire. Conclusions: This trial will investigate the effect of neprilysin inhibition on LV remodelling and the neurohumoral actions of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with asymptomatic LVSD following MI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Guidelines for the management of chronic heart failure (CHF) cite the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to support treatment recommendations. The significance of an observed treatment-effect relies on the use of a boundary P-value, most commonly P<0.05. There is concern about relying on arbitrary threshold P-values to report results as ‘statistically significant’. The ‘fragility index’ (FI) has been proposed as an additional measure of the robustness of trial findings. FI is the minimum number of events needing to change from a non-event to an event in order to render a significant result non-significant. We calculated the FI to examine the robustness of statistically significant RCTs in CHF. Methods and results Two reviewers extracted data from RCTs supporting treatment recommendations in CHF guidelines. Twenty-five eligible trials were identified with a median sample size of 2331 patients (range 129–8399) and a median number of primary endpoints of 688.5 (range 88–2031). For the primary endpoint (analysed for 20 trials), the median FI was 26 (range 0–118). The FI was≤10 in 7 (35%) of these 20 trials, and in 4 (20%) trials the number of patients lost to follow-up in the treatment group exceeded the FI. Conclusion The results of some large RCTs in CHF hinge on a small number of events. The FI offers an additional, easy to understand metric, which augments the standard reporting of boundary P-values for statistical significance. The FI helps in the interpretation of the robustness of the results of RCTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Aims Methods and results Conclusions In the absence of randomized trial evidence, we performed a large observational analysis of the association between beta‐blocker (BB) use and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced (HFmrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).We pooled individual patient data from four large HFmrEF/HFpEF trials (I‐Preserve, TOPCAT, PARAGON‐HF, and DELIVER). The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Among the 16 951 patients included, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 56.8%, and 13 400 (79.1%) had HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%). Overall, 12 812 patients (75.6%) received a BB. The median bisoprolol‐equivalent dose of BB was 5.0 (Q1–Q3: 2.5–5.0) mg with BB continuation rates of 93.1% at 2 years (in survivors). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the primary outcome did not differ between BB users and non‐users (HR 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.05), but the adjusted HR was lower in BB users than non‐users (0.81, 95% CI 0.74–0.88), and this association was maintained across LVEF (pinteraction = 0.88). In subgroup analyses, the adjusted risk of the primary outcome was similar in BB users and non‐users with or without a history of myocardial infarction, hypertension, or a baseline heart rate <70 bpm. By contrast, a better outcome with BB use was seen in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to those without atrial fibrillation (pintreraction = 0.02).In this observational analysis of non‐randomized BB treatment, there was no suggestion that BB use was associated with worse HF outcomes in HFmrEF/HFpEF, even after extensive adjustment for other prognostic variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Methods and results Conclusion Although the prevalence of heart failure (HF) increases markedly with advancing age, surprisingly little is known about HF in the very elderly. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of octogenarians with HF.Individual participant meta‐analysis of patients with HF and reduced, mildly reduced, and preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF, respectively) enrolled in eight large randomized trials. Overall, the proportion of octogenarians was 1518 of 20 168 patients (7.5%) with HFrEF, 610 of 4609 (13.2%) with HFmrEF, and 3130 of 15 354 (20.4%) with HFpEF. Regardless of HF phenotype, octogenarian patients were more often female and had more comorbidities, more symptoms and signs of congestion, and worse health status (but not quality of life), in comparison to patients aged <80 years. The incidence (per 100 person‐years) of the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization was 13.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.7–14.0) in octogenarians versus 9.5 (95% CI 9.3–9.7) in non‐octogenarians (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.40, 95% CI 1.32–1.48). Each component of the composite was more frequent in octogenarians with rates of cardiovascular mortality of 7.0 (95% CI 6.5–7.4) per 100 person‐years versus 4.9 (95% CI 4.8–5.1) in non‐octogenarians (aHR 1.60, 95% CI 1.48–1.72, p < 0.001). Octogenarians received less evidence‐based therapy, especially mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, than younger patients.Despite worse health status and higher hospitalization and mortality rates, octogenarians were undertreated compared to younger patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: We investigated which patients with heart failure (HF) should receive specialist palliative care (SPC) by first creating a definition of need for SPC in patients hospitalised with HF using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and then testing this definition using the outcome of days alive and out of hospital (DAOH). We also evaluated which baseline variables predicted need for SPC and whether those with this need received SPC., Methods and Results: PROMs assessing quality of life (QoL), symptoms, and mood were administered at baseline and every 4 months. SPC need was defined as persistently severe impairment of any PROM without improvement (or severe impairment immediately preceding death). We then tested whether need for SPC, so defined, was reflected in DAOH, a measure which combines length of stay, days of hospital re-admission, and days lost due to death. Of 272 patients recruited, 74 (27%) met the definition of SPC needs. These patients lived one third fewer DAOH than those without SPC need (and less than a quarter of QoL-adjusted DAOH). A Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) summary score of <29 identified patients who subsequently had SPC needs (area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.78). Twenty-four per cent of patients with SPC needs actually received SPC (n = 18)., Conclusions: A quarter of patients hospitalised with HF had a need for SPC and were identified by a low KCCQ score on admission. Those with SPC need spent many fewer DAOH and their DAOH were of significantly worse quality. Very few patients with SPC needs accessed SPC services., (© 2018 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure © 2018 European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: The primary aim of this study is to provide data to inform the design of a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) of a palliative care (PC) intervention in heart failure (HF). We will identify an appropriate study population with a high prevalence of PC needs defined using quantifiable measures. We will also identify which components a specific and targeted PC intervention in HF should include and attempt to define the most relevant trial outcomes., Methods: An unselected, prospective, near-consecutive, cohort of patients admitted to hospital with acute decompensated HF will be enrolled over a 2-year period. All potential participants will be screened using B-type natriuretic peptide and echocardiography, and all those enrolled will be extensively characterized in terms of their HF status, comorbidity, and PC needs. Quantitative assessment of PC needs will include evaluation of general and disease-specific quality of life, mood, symptom burden, caregiver burden, and end of life care. Inpatient assessments will be performed and after discharge outpatient assessments will be carried out every 4 months for up to 2.5 years. Participants will be followed up for a minimum of 1 year for hospital admissions, and place and cause of death. Methods for identifying patients with HF with PC needs will be evaluated, and estimates of healthcare utilisation performed., Conclusion: By assessing the prevalence of these needs, describing how these needs change over time, and evaluating how best PC needs can be identified, we will provide the foundation for designing an RCT of a PC intervention in HF.