Search

International audience; Background: In spite of the frequency and clinical impact of BRCA1/2 alterations in high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (HGEOC), real-world information based on robust data warehouse has been scarce to date. Methods: Consecutive patients with BRCA-mutated HGEOC treated between 2011 and 2016 within French comprehensive cancer centers from the Unicancer network were extracted from the ESME database. The main objective of the study was the assessment of clinicopathological and treatments parameters. Results: Out of the 8021 patients included in the ESME database, 266 patients matching the selection criteria were included. BRCA1 mutation was found in 191 (71.8%) patients, while 75 (28.2%) had a BRCA2 mutation only; 95.5% of patients received a cytoreductive surgery. All patients received a taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy (median = six cycles). Complete and partial response were obtained in 53.3% and 20.4% of the cases, respectively. Maintenance therapy was administered in 55.3% of the cases, bevacizumab being the most common agent. After a median follow up of 51.7 months, a median progression-free survival of 28.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI) [26.5; 32.7]) and an estimated 5-year median overall survival of 69.2% (95% CI [61.6; 70.3]) were reported. Notably, BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated cases exhibited a trend towards different median progression-free survivals, with 28.0 (95% CI [24.4; 32.3]) and 33.3 months (95% CI [26.7; 46.1]), respectively (p-value = 0.053). Furthermore, five-year OS for BRCA1-mutated patients was 64.5% (95% CI [59.7; 69.2]), while it was 82.5% (95% CI [76.6; 88.5]) for BRCA2-mutated ones (p-value = 0.029). Conclusions: This study reports the largest French multicenter cohort of BRCA-mutated HGEOCs based on robust data from the ESME, exhibiting relevant real-world data regarding this specific population.

Background: About 40% of breast cancer cases occur in women 65 years old (yo) or older and 20% in women over 75 yo. These numbers are expected to increase in the near future. Ironically, older patients remain underrepresented in clinical trials with no improvement in the past decade, although they may present different efficacy/toxicity profiles compared with younger adults. In this context, real life cohorts may bring valuable insight to identify potential barriers to recruitment of older patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in clinical trials. Methods: We used the national Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC Data Platform, a multi-center real life database using a retrospective data collection process in 18 French Cancer Centers. Cases selected were adult patients with MBC whose first metastasis was treated between January 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2016. We selected MBC women over 70 yo at the time of MBC diagnosis, with at least one line of systemic treatment and no other cancer in the 5 years before MBC. The primary objective was to describe factors associated with enrollment in clinical trials in older patients, using a multivariable Cox model. Factors included in this model were age (continuous, and by class), period (2008-2011 vs 2012-2016), phenotype (ER+, HER2+, or ER- HER2-), ECOG Performance Status (PS), treatment, metastatic sites (brain, visceral, nodes/bone only) and number, and volume of hospital activity. No geriatric description could be extracted from the database. Results: There were 5846 patients ≥70yo (median age 77) and 15892 patients < 70 yo. Of the older ones, 245 (4.2%) were enrolled in a clinical trial in first line compared with 1602 (10%) for younger ones. Most of the older patients in this cohort (66%) had ER+ HER2+ disease, half had visceral metastases (< 3 metastatic sites in 82%). Median follow-up of older patients was 46.3 months; 95%CI 44.8-49.0. Cause of death was related to disease in 1155 (33.9%) older patients, and related to another cause or unknown in 2156 (63.3%), data were missing for 2441 patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 34.1 months in the older population, 95%CI 32.9-35.4, and specific overall survival was 70.8 months, 95%CI 66.3-80.0. Significant factors identified in the multivariable analysis for enrollment in 1st line treatment clinical trial ≥70 are shown in table. Volume of activity was not identified as one. By multivariate analysis, participation of older patients to a clinical trial was associated with an increased OS (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.6-0.8) but not with a better breast cancer specific survival (HR 0.94; 95%CI 0.68-1.29). Conclusions: In this large real-life database, few older MBC patients were enrolled in a trial compared with younger ones. Factors associated with such participation to clinical research were younger age (< 80 yo), good PS, HER2+ disease, and investigational treatment consisting of chemotherapy or targeted therapy. There was a small improvement in accruing older patients between 2007-2011 and 2012-2016 (2.6% versus 5.5%). Most of these factors raise questions on drug availability and perceived potential benefits by investigators and medical teams. Accrual of older patients with cancer in other disease types should be more encouraged. VariableOR95%CIAge vs 70-75 75-80 80-85 85+0.74 0.47 0.170.54-1 0.31-0.71 0.06-0.37MBC diagnosis period vs 2008-2011 2012-20161.671.23-2.27Phenotype vs Others HER2+1.761.26-2.45PS vs 0 1 2-40.71 0.150.5-1 0.08-0.26Treatment4.88 5.253.08-7.9 3.48-8.14Chemotherapy vs others4.883.08-7.9Targeted treatment vs others5.253.48-8.14 Citation Format: Michael Bringuier, Matthieu Carton, Christelle Levy, Anne Patsouris, David Pasquier, Marc Debled, Olivier Rigal, William Jacot, Anthony Gonçalves, Isabelle Desmoulins, Thibault De La Motte Rouge, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Florence Dalenc, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Thierry Petit, Michael Chevrot, Coralie Courtinard, Lionel Uwer, Jean-Sebastien Frenel, Capucine Baldini. Enrollment of older metastatic breast cancer patients in clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-46.

Background: Prognosis of women with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has radically improved over the past 10 years, resulting from the implementation in clinical of anti-HER2 therapies. However, there are limited data regarding these trends in the older women, although they represent a growing segment of the population. Standard strategy being based mostly on combinations of anti-HER2 treatments with chemotherapy, under-treatment may be a specific issue in this population. Methods: Based on the ESME MBC Data Platform (NCT03275311),a unique national real-life database including individual data from all patients (pts) ≥18 years who initiated a first-line treatment for MBC between 2008 and 2016 in the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers, the main objective of this work was the description of patients’ outcome in women with HER2+ MBC according to age: ≥70 vs Results: Of 22463 cases selected, 4045 (18%) women had HER2+ MBC with a 4.4-year median follow-up. Of those, 814 (20%) were aged ≥ 70 and had more often HR+ disease (Table 1). As 1st line treatment, anti-HER2 therapy was prescribed in 76% vs 92% of older vs younger pts, combined with chemotherapy in 65% vs 89%. Median OS and PFS (years) were 2.9 [2.6-3.1] and 0.9 [0.8 - 1.0] vs 4.5 [4.2-4.6] and 1.1 [1.1-1.2] in older vs younger patients. Multivariate analysis for OS identified the following variables as significant: age ≥ 70 (HR=1.57 IC95% [1.40-1.75]), 2 and ≥ 3 metastatic sites (HR=1.24 IC95% [1.10-1.39] and HR=1.92 IC95% [1.70-2.17] respectively), de novo MBC (HR 0.70 IC95% [0.63 - 0.77]), visceral disease with a time-varying effect (HR=2.67 IC95% [2.11-3.39] and 5.98 IC95% [4.64-7.46] at 1 and 5 years) and first-line treatment with a time-varying effect, better prognosis for combination of chemotherapy + anti-HER2 agent + endocrine therapy vs any other. Except for de novo MBC, similar results were observed for PFS. Conclusions: In this large real-life database, older HER2+ MBC patients received significantly less frequently “standard” first-line anti-HER2 treatment, defined as a combination of chemotherapy and anti-HER2 treatment. Age was a strong risk factor for both PFS and OS. Given the lack of information on geriatric assessment (e.g. general health status, functional status, comorbidity, etc.), confounding factors and usual selection biases cannot be ruled out. These results stress the importance to study older populations with specific approaches, not based on the usual transfer of those developed in younger ones, in order to avoid under and overtreatments, both that are not acceptable. Table 1: Patients’ characteristics and first-line treatment≥70 Citation Format: Mylène Annonay, Morgane Abiven, Etienne Brain, Mony Ung, Laurence Cristol-Dalstein, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Anthony Goncalves, Sophie Abadie-Lacourtoisie, Eric Francois, Claudia Lefeuvre-Plesse, Johann Le Fel, Veronique Lorgis, Veronique Servent, Lionel Uwer, Christelle Jouannaud, Marianne Leheurteur, Loic Campion, Coralie Courtinard, Olivier Villacroux, Thierry Petit, Pierre Soubeyran, Thomas Bachelot, Carine Bellera, Suzette Delaloge. Treatments and outcome in older versus younger women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the multicenter national observational ESME database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-19.

PURPOSE: A major question when treating HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is whether early introduction of chemotherapy (CT) increases endocrine resistance. We aimed to describe progression-free survival (PFS) under first endocrine therapy (ET) depending on whether given before or after CT in a large nationwide cohort, in the pre-CDK era. METHODS: The real-life retrospective ESME database includes all patients with MBC whose first-line treatment was initiated between 2008 and 2014 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. Our primary objective was to compare PFS from start of first ET in patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who received ET or CT first. RESULTS: We identified 6293 patients who received at least one ET line during their first two therapeutic lines for MBC. As first-line therapy, 3832 (60.9%) received ET alone (ET1 1st group), whilst 2461 (39.1%) received CT, including 2024 patients (32.2%) with maintenance ET after CT (ET1 after CT group). Median PFS under first ET was 12.4 months (95% CI 11.9-13.1) in ET 1st group vs. 12.6 months in ET1 after CT group (95% CI 12.1-13.4), HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-1.01, P = 0.1277). CONCLUSIONS: PFS under first ET appears identical whether prescribed before or after chemotherapy. These data suggest chemotherapy does not promote endocrine resistance.

Purpose: Older cancer patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. We aimed to understand barriers to clinical trial recruitment in women aged 70 years old (yo) or over with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Methods: We used the national Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics MBC Data Platform, a French multi-center real life database. We selected MBC women over 70yo, without central nervous system metastases, with at least one line of systemic treatment, between January 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2016, and had no other cancer in the 5 years before MBC. The primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients enrolled in clinical trials according to their age. Secondary objective was to identify variables associated with enrollment.Results: 5552 women were aged ≥ 70 (median 74yo; IQR72-77). 14611 were less than 70. Of the older ones, 239 (4%) were enrolled in a clinical trial during first line of treatment, compared with 1529 (10.5%) for younger ones. Multivariable analysis of variables predicting for enrollment during first line of treatment in older patients were younger age (OR 0.50 [95%CI; 0.33-0.76] for the 80-85yo class; OR 0.17 [95%CI; 0.06-0.39] for the 85yo and more class), good ECOG Performance Status (PS 0-1) (OR 0.15 [95%CI; 0.08-0.27] for the PS 2-4 class), HER2+ disease (OR 1.78 [95%CI; 1.27-2.48]), type of treatment (chemotherapy/targeted therapy/immunotherapy OR 5.01 [95%CI; 3.13-8.18]), and period (OR 1.65 [95%CI; 1.22–2.26] for 2012-2016, compared to 2008-2011).Conclusions: In this large database, few older MBC patients were enrolled in a trial compared with younger ones.

Older cancer patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate the enrollment of older women aged 70 years old (yo) or over with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in clinical trials.We used the national Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics MBC Data Platform, a French multi-center real-life database. We selected MBC women over 70yo, without central nervous system metastases, with at least one line of systemic treatment, between January 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2016, and had no other cancer in the 5 years before MBC. The primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients enrolled in clinical trials according to their age. Secondary objective was to identify variables associated with enrollment in older ones.5552 women were aged ≥ 70 (median 74yo; IQR 72-77). 14,611 were less than 70. Of the older ones, 239 (4%) were enrolled in a clinical trial during first line of treatment, compared with 1529 (10.5%) for younger ones. Multivariable analysis of variables predicting for enrollment during first line of treatment in older patients were younger age (OR 0.50 [95%CI 0.33-0.76] for the 80-85yo class; OR 0.17 [95%CI 0.06-0.39] for the 85yo and more class), good ECOG Performance Status (PS 0-1) (OR 0.15 [95%CI 0.08-0.27] for the PS 2-4 class), HER2 + disease (OR 1.78 [95%CI 1.27-2.48]), type of treatment (chemotherapy/targeted therapy/immunotherapy OR 5.01 [95%CI 3.13-8.18]), and period (OR 1.65 [95%CI 1.22-2.26] for 2012-2016, compared to 2008-2011).In this large database, few older MBC patients were enrolled in a trial compared with younger ones.

International audience; Eribulin mesylate (EM) was recently approved for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) chemotherapy (CT) in late lines by the FDA, with debated results in second line. We evaluated outcomes in breast cancer patients receiving EM as second, third and fourth line in a national real-life cohort of 16,703 consecutive MBC patients initiating their first metastatic therapeutic line between 2008 and 2014. Primary and secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). An imbalance was seen for HER2+ tumors and concomitant anti-HER2 targeted therapies use, we thus performed a subanalysis in HER2- patients. PFS and OS were significantly better in EM patients in third and fourth lines, compared to "Other chemotherapies" patients (PFS: 4.14 vs. 3.02 months, p = 0.0010; 3.61 vs. 2.53 months, p = 0.0102, third and fourth-line; OS: 11.27 vs. 7.65 months, p = 0.0001; 10.91 vs. 5.95 months, p

Background: Therapeutic options at diagnosis for metastatic breast cancers (MBC) differ largely according to cancer phenotype (namely, hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status). Reported discordance rates between primary tumor and metastasis vary widely in literature, with a median of 18% for estrogen receptor, 31% for progesterone receptor and 10% for HER2. The present study aimed to compare phenotypic profiles between primary and MBC in the real-life setting. Patients (pts) and methods: Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME)MBC data platform (NCT03275311) is a French national, multicenter, observational cohort using clinical trials' methodology for data capture, monitoring and quality controls. At the time of analysis, it comprised data of 16703 consecutive newly diagnosed MBC pts (1/01/08-31/12/14) treated in 18 French comprehensive cancer centres. The primary endpoint was the discordance rate of HR and HER2 status between primary tumor and MBC (biopsy of metastatic site done within 6 months of MBC diagnosis). Only patients with both histological reports available were considered. Potential factors associated with phenotype discordance were assessed in a multivariate logistic regression. Results: 2933 out of 16703 (17.6%) had a biopsy in the first 6 months of metastatic disease. HR and/or HER2 status was available in 1677 pts. The discordance rate between primary and matched MBC was 14.2% (222/1566) for HR: loss of expression in 72.5%, gain in 27.5%. For HER2, the discordance rate was 7.8% (84/1076): 45.2% of losses and 54.8% of gains of expression. The primary HR+/HER2+ subgroup had the highest rate of changes: 53% (49/92) with either a loss of HR (43%), loss of HER2 (43%) or a loss of both (14%). 18% (33/181) of primary triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) had a phenotypic change with a majority of HR gain (79%). In multivariate analysis, administration of adjuvant chemotherapy +/- targeted therapy was the sole independent predictor of HR status modification (OR: 1.73, 95%CI 1.27-2.36, p=0.001). The presence of a mixed histology was the only predictor of HER2 discordance (OR =2.57, 95%CI 1.19-5.55, p=0.016). Patient characteristics Total population (n=16703)Pts with primary and MBC phenotype available (n=1677)Age at metastatic diagnosis Median (range)61 (19-99)60 (24-93)De novo MBC4507 (27.1%)221 (13.2%)Number of metastatic sites Median (range)1 (1-9)2 (1-7)MBC sites Brain1200 (7.2%)138 (8.2%)Visceral7755 (46.4%)928 (55.3%)Non-visceral7748 (46.4%)611 (36.4%)Phenotypic profileN = 2933N=1677TNBC356 (18.5%)272 (19.3%)HR+/HER2-1251 (65.0%)917 (65.2%)HR-/HER2+150 (7.8%)105 (7.5%)HR+/HER2+168 (8.7%)112 (8%)Missing1008271Metastatic site samplingN=2933N=1677Bone692 (24.2%)419 (25.5%)Liver514 (18.0%)355 (21.6%)Skin379 (13.3%)203 (12.4%)Node306 (10.7%)169 (10.3%)Lung258 (9.0%)168 (10.2%)Pleura283 (9.9%)121 (7.4%)CNS/CSF*132 (4.6%)42 (2.6%)Other or multiple296 (10.3%)165 (10.0%)Missing7335* CNS= central nervous system, CSF=cerebro-spinal fluid Conclusion: Biopsy and phenotype re-evaluation of MBC early in the disease course has a confirmed potential significant therapeutic impact in this large scale real life setting and should be proposed as often as possible. Citation Format: Lefevre S, Lusque A, Joyon N, Arnould L, Penault-Llorca F, MacGrogan G, Treilleux I, Vincent-Salomon A, Haudebourg J, Maran-Gonzalez A, Charafe-Jauffret E, Courtinard C, Franchet C, Verriele V, Brain E, Tas P, Delaloge S, Filleron T, LaCroix-Triki M. Phenotypic discordance between primary and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a large scale real-life multicentre French cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-05.

Expression of hormone receptor (HR) for estrogens (ER) and progesterone (PR) and HER2 remains the cornerstone to define the therapeutic strategy for breast cancer patients. We aimed to compare phenotypic profiles between matched primary and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the ESME database, a National real-life multicenter cohort of MBC patients. Patients with results available on both primary tumour and metastatic disease within 6 months of MBC diagnosis and before any tumour progression were eligible for the main analysis. Among the 16,703 patients included in the database, 1677 (10.0%) had available biopsy results at MBC diagnosis and on matched primary tumour. The change rate of either HR or HER2 was 27.0%. Global HR status changed (from positive = either ER or PR positive, to negative = both negative; and reverse) in 14.2% of the cases (expression loss in 72.5% and gain in 27.5%). HER2 status changed in 7.8% (amplification loss in 45.2%). The discordance rate appeared similar across different biopsy sites. Metastasis to bone, HER2+ and RH+/HER2- subtypes and previous adjuvant endocrine therapy, but not relapse interval were associated with an HR discordance in multivariable analysis. Loss of HR status was significantly associated with a risk of death (HR adjusted = 1.51, p = 0.002) while gain of HR and HER2 discordance was not. In conclusion, discordance of HR and HER2 expression between primary and metastatic breast cancer cannot be neglected. In addition, HR loss is associated with worse survival. Sampling metastatic sites is essential for treatment adjustment.

Background Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a rare complication of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with high morbidity/mortality rates. Our study aimed to describe the largest-to-date real-life population of MBC patients treated with intrathecal (IT) therapy and to evaluate prognostic models. Methods The Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC database (NCT03275311) includes all consecutive patients who have initiated treatment for MBC since 2008. Overall survival (OS) of patients treated with IT therapy was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic models were constructed using Cox proportional hazards models. Performance was evaluated using C-index and calibration plots. Results Of the 22 266 patients included in the database between 2008 and 2016, 312 received IT therapy and were selected for our analysis. Compared with non-IT-treated patients, IT-treated patients were younger at MBC relapse (median age: 52 years versus 61 years) and more often had lobular histology (23.4% versus 12.7%) or triple-negative subtype (24.7% versus 13.3%) (all P < 0.001). Median OS was 4.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-5.6] and 1-year survival rate was 25.6%. Significant prognostic factors associated with poorer outcome on multivariable analysis were triple-negative subtype (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% CI 1.32-2.47), treatment line ≥3 (hazard ratio 1.88, 95% CI 1.30-2.73), ≥3 other metastatic sites (hazard ratio 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.74) and IT cytarabine or thiotepa versus methotrexate (hazard ratio 1.68, 95% CI 1.28-2.22), while concomitant systemic therapy was associated with better OS (hazard ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.62) (all P < 0.001). We validated two previously published prognostic scores, the Curie score and the Breast-graded prognostic assessment, both with C-index of 0.57. Conclusions MBC patients with LM treated with IT therapy have a poor prognosis. We could identify a subgroup of patients with better prognosis, when concomitant systemic therapy and IT methotrexate were used., Highlights • The outcome of BC patients with IT-treated LM is poor, with a median OS of 4.5 months. • Concomitant systemic therapy may improve the outcome in IT-treated patients. • Patients treated with IT methotrexate had better outcome than those treated with IT cytarabine/thiotepa. • The Curie and Breast-graded prognostic assessment scores were prognostic for IT-treated patients.

Background High Body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for breast cancer among postmenopausal women and an adverse prognostic factor in early-stage. Little is known about its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods The National ESME-MBC observational cohort includes all consecutive patients newly diagnosed with MBC between Jan 2008 and Dec 2016 in the 18 French comprehensive cancer centers. Results Of 22 463 patients in ESME-MBC, 12 999 women had BMI data available at MBC diagnosis. Median BMI was 24.9 kg/m2 (range 12.1–66.5); 20% of women were obese and 5% underweight. Obesity was associated with more de novo MBC, while underweight patients had more aggressive cancer features. Median overall survival (OS) of the BMI cohort was 47.4 months (95% CI [46.2–48.5]) (median follow-up: 48.6 months). Underweight was independently associated with a worse OS (median OS 33 months; HR 1.14, 95%CI, 1.02–1.27) and first line progression-free survival (HR, 1.11; 95%CI, 1.01; 1.22), while overweight or obesity had no effect. Conclusion Overweight and obesity are not associated with poorer outcomes in women with metastatic disease, while underweight appears as an independent adverse prognostic factor., Highlights • This is the first large multicenter cohort reporting BMI’s effect on outcomes among patients with metastatic breast cancer. • Overweight or obese status does not negatively influence outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients, whatever the subtype. • Underweight is a strong negative independent prognostic factor on outcomes, whatever the subtype.

Background Treatment strategies for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have made great strides over the past 10 years. Real-world data allow us to evaluate the actual benefit of new treatments. ESME (Epidemio-Strategy-Medico-Economical)-MBC, a nationwide observational cohort (NCT03275311), gathers data of all consecutive MBC patients who initiated their treatment in 18 French Cancer Centres since 2008. Patients and methods We evaluated overall survival (OS) in the whole cohort (N = 20 446) and among subtypes: hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 negative (HR+/HER2−; N = 13 590), HER2+ (N = 3919), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC; N = 2937). We performed multivariable analyses including year of MBC diagnosis as one of the covariates, to assess the potential OS improvement over time, and we described exposure to newly released drugs at any time during MBC history by year of diagnosis (YOD). Results The median follow-up of the whole cohort was 65.5 months (95% CI 64.6-66.7). Year of metastatic diagnosis appears as a strong independent prognostic factor for OS [Year 2016 HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.97); P = 0.009, using 2008 as reference]. This effect is driven by the HER2+ subcohort, where it is dramatic [Year 2016 HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.42-0.66); P < 0.001, using 2008 as reference]. YOD had, however, no sustained impact on OS among patients with TNBC [Year 2016 HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.77-1.11); P = 0.41, using 2008 as reference] nor among those with HR+/HER2– MBC [Year 2016 HR 1.02 (95% CI 0.91-1.13); P = 0.41, using 2008 as reference]. While exposure to newly released anti-HER2 therapies appeared very high (e.g. >70% of patients received pertuzumab from 2016 onwards), use of everolimus or eribulin was recorded in less than one-third of HR+/HER2– and TNBC cohorts, respectively, whatever YOD. Conclusion OS has dramatically improved among HER2+ MBC patients, probably in association with the release of several major HER2-directed therapies, whose penetrance was high. This trend was not observed in the other subtypes, but the impact of CDK4/6 inhibitors cannot yet be assessed., Highlights • OS of HER2+ MBC patients keeps improving over time [Year 2016 HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.42-0.66); P < 0.001, using 2008 as reference]. • This effect seems timely related to the release of drugs demonstrated to improve survival in clinical trials. • OS gains observed in real life among HER2+ MBC patients are at least equivalent to those observed in clinical trials. • YOD had no sustained impact on OS among patients with TNBC and luminal MBC. • The impact of CDK4/6 inhibitors cannot yet be assessed in this cohort.

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) often require inpatient palliative care (IPC). However, mounting evidence suggests age-related disparities in palliative care delivery. This study aimed to assess the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of IPC delivery, as well as the influence of age.The national ESME (Epidemio-Strategy-Medical-Economical)-MBC cohort includes consecutive MBC patients treated in 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. ICD-10 palliative care coding was used for IPC identification.Our analysis included 12,375 patients, 5093 (41.2%) of whom were aged 65 or over. The median follow-up was 41.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.5-42.5). The CIF of IPC was 10.3% (95% CI, 10.2-10.4) and 24.8% (95% CI, 24.7-24.8) at 2 and 8 years, respectively. At 2 years, among triple-negative patients, young patients (65 yo) had a higher CIF of IPC than older patients after adjusting for cancer characteristics, centre and period (65+/65: β = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.01). Among other tumour sub-types, older patients received short-term IPC more frequently than young patients (65+/65: β = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.03). At 8 years, outside large centres, IPC was delivered less frequently to older patients adjusted to cancer characteristics and period (65+/65: β = -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01).We found a relatively low CIF of IPC and that age influenced IPC delivery. Young triple-negative and older non-triple-negative patients needed more short-term IPCs. Older patients diagnosed outside large centres received less long-term IPC. These findings highlight the need for a wider implementation of IPC facilities and for more age-specific interventions.

Background Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) may require inpatient palliative care (IPC) but literature suggests age-related disparities in palliative care delivery. This study, based on real-world data, aimed to assess the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of IPC delivery and if age is an independent factor, taking into account the competing risk of death. Methods The national multicenter ESME (Epidemio-Strategy-Medical-Economical)-MBC cohort includes consecutive MBC patients treated in the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. IPC identification used ICD-10 palliative care coding. Main analysis first estimated pseudo values of 2-year and 8-year CIF of IPC. Linear regression models estimated the mean changes of pseudo-values (2 models: 2-year and 8-year CIF of IPC). Results Our analysis included 12375 patients, 5093 (41.2%) of whom were aged 65 or over. The median follow-up was 41.5 months (95% CI, 40.5-42.5). The CIF of IPC was 10.3% (95% CI, 10.2-10.4) and 24.8% (95% CI, 24.7-24.8) at two and eight years, respectively. At two years, among triple-negative patients, young patients ( Conclusions We found a relatively low CIF of IPC and that age influenced IPC delivery. Young triple negative and older non-triple negative patients needed more short-term IPC. Older patients diagnosed outside large centres received less long-term IPC. These findings highlight the need for a wider implementation of IPC facilities and for more age-specific interventions. Key messages Our study highlighted particular challenge for older MBC patients diagnosed outside large French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. By identifying age at MBC diagnosis as a factor of IPC delivery, this report supports a wider implementation of IPC facilities and more age-specific interventions.

The aims of the present study were to describe treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with central nervous system metastases (CNSM) selected among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients included in a retrospective study from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC cohort.Neurological progression-free survival (NPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Significant contributors to NPFS were determined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.After a median follow-up of 42.8 months, of 16 701 patients included in the ESME MBC database, CNSM were diagnosed in 24.6% of patients. The most frequent treatments after diagnosis of CNSM were whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (45.2%) and systemic treatment (59.3%). Median OS and NPFS were 7.9 months (95% CI: 7.2-8.4) and 5.5 months (95% CI: 5.2-5.8), respectively. In multivariate analysis, age70 years (vs50 years; HR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.24-1.57), triple-negative tumours (vs HER2-/HR+; HR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.71-2.06), HER2+/HR-tumours (vs HER2-/HR+; HR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.02-1.27), ≥3 metastatic sites (vs 3; HR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.21-1.43) and ≥3 previous treatment lines (vs 3; HR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.56-1.96) were detrimental for NPFS. A time interval between selection and CNSM diagnosis superior to 18 months (vs9 months; HR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78-0.98) was associated with longer NPFS.This study describes current treatment patterns of MBC patients in a "real life" setting. Despite advances in stereotactic radiation therapy, most of the patients still received WBRT. More research is warranted to identify patient subsets for tailored treatment strategies.

Background: In 2014, UNICANCER (composed of 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers) launched the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) program to investigate real-world data in solid tumors. Real-world data give the opportunity to assess for the activity of specific drugs outside clinical trials. Eribulin is approved for pre-treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Marketing authorization has been granted in France in July 2012. However few data are available regarding its efficacy in real life. We evaluated eribulin use as second and third line of chemotherapy in MBC patients from the ESME database. Methods: Data from all newly diagnosed MBC patients having initiated at least one treatment between Jan. 2008 and Dec. 2014 are included in the ESME database. Data were collected retrospectively using a clinical trial-like methodology. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), defined from the starting date of second or third line chemotherapy (eribulin versus other chemotherapy). Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated as a secondary endpoint. Results: Of 16,703 MBC patients included in the ESME database, 7,412 received at least 2 lines of chemotherapy: eribulin/other chemotherapy, total 1,966/5,446, second line 363/5,446, third line 654/2,669. Depending on second or third line chemotherapy use classification, median age was 59 years (range 20-97) and 58 year (range 21 – 94), triple negative tumors accounted for 20% and 19% of cases, and median follow-up reached 26 months and 22 months respectively. Table reports median OS and PFS, according to lines and type of chemotherapy. OS eribulin (months)OS other chemotherapy (months)pPFS Eribulin (months)PFS other chemotherapy (months)pSecond line12.4 (11.3-15.1)11.8 (11.3-12.3)0.4654.1 (3.7-4.9)4.1 (4.0-4.3)0.9225Third line10.3 (9.3-11.5)7.7 (7.3-8.0) Supportive analyses (using a propensity score for adjustment and as a matching factor for nested case–control analyses) and sensitivity analyses will be available for full presentation at the meeting. Conclusion: In this large-scale real-life setting, MBC patients treated with third line eribulin showed an improved OS and PFS compared with those receiving another chemotherapy. The difference was not statistically significant for second line treatment. Citation Format: Jacot W, Heudel P-E, Fraisse J, Gourgou S, Guiu S, Dalenc F, Pistilli B, Campone M, Levy C, Debled M, Leheurteur M, Chaix M, Lefeuvre C, Goncalves A, Uwer L, Ferrero J-M, Eymard J-C, Petit T, Mouret-Reynier M-A, Courtinard C, Cottu P, Robain M, Mailliez A. Real-life activity of eribulin among metastatic breast cancer patients in the multicenter national observational ESME program [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-14-02.

Background and Aims: Because of its low prevalence, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in males is managed based on clinical experience with women. Using a real-life database, we aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of male MBC characteristics, management and outcome. Methods: The Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics Data Platform collected data for all men and women ⩾18 years with MBC in 18 participating French Comprehensive Cancer Centers from January 2008 to November 2016. Demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics were retrieved, as was treatment modality. Men were matched 1:1 to women with similar characteristics. Results: Of 16,701 evaluable patients, 149 (0.89%) men were identified. These men were older (median age 69 years) and predominantly had hormone receptor HR+/HER2– disease (78.3%). Median overall survival (OS) was 41.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI: 26.9–49.7)] and similar to women. Median progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line therapy was 9.3 months [95% CI (7.4–11.5)]. In the HR+/HER2– subpopulation, endocrine therapy (ET) alone was the frontline treatment for 43% of patients, including antiestrogens ( n = 19), aromatase inhibitors ( n = 15) with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs ( n = 3), and various sequential treatments. Median PFS achieved by frontline ET alone was similar in men [9.8 months, 95% CI (6.9–17.4)] and in women [13 months, 95% CI (8.4–30.9)] ( p = 0.80). PFS was similar for HR+/HER2– men receiving upfront ET or chemotherapy: 9.8 months [95% CI (6.9–17.4)] versus 9.5 months [95% CI (7.4–11.7)] ( p = 0.22), respectively. Conclusion: MBC management in men and women leads to similar outcomes, especially in HR+/HER2– patients for whom ET should also be a cornerstone. Unsolved questions remain and successfully recruiting trials for men are still lacking.

Real-life analysis of overall survival (OS) trends among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients may help define medical needs and evaluate the impact of public health investments. The present study aimed to evaluate the independent impact of the year of MBC diagnosis on OS in the Epidemio-Strategy-Medical-Economical (ESME)-MBC cohort.ESME-MBC (NCT03275311) is a French, national, multicentre, observational cohort including 16,702 consecutive newly diagnosed MBC patients (01 January 2008-31 December 2014). Of 16,680 eligible patients, 15,085 had full immunohistochemistry data, allowing classification as hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-, N = 9907), HER2-positive (HER2+, N = 2861) or triple-negative (HR-/HER2-, N = 2317) subcohorts. Multivariate analyses of OS were conducted among the full ESME cohort and subcohorts.Median OS of the whole cohort was 37.22 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.3-38.04). Year of diagnosis was an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-1.00], P = .01) together with age, subtype, disease-free interval, visceral metastases and number of organs involved. Median OS of HR+/HER2-, HER2+ and HR-/HER2- subcohorts was, respectively, 42.12 (95% CI, 40.90-43.10), 44.91 (95% CI, 42.51-47.90) and 14.52 (95% CI, 13.70-15.24) months. Year of diagnosis was a strong independent predictor of OS in HER2+ subcohort (hazard ratio 0.91 [95% CI, 0.88-0.94], P .001), but not in HR+/HER2- nor HR-/HER2- subcohorts (hazard ratio 1.00 [95% CI, 0.98-1.01], P = .80 and 1.00 [95% CI, 0.97-1.02], P = .90, respectively).The OS of MBC patients has slightly improved over the past decade. However, this effect is confined to HER2+ cases, highlighting the need of new strategies in the other subtypes.

Background Bevacizumab combined with paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has led to mixed results in randomized trials, with an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) but no statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit. Real-life data could help in assessing the value of this combination. Patients and methods This study aimed to describe the outcome following first-line paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) database of MBC patients, established in 2014 by Unicancer. The primary and secondary end points were OS and PFS, respectively. Results From 2008 to 2013, 14 014 MBC patient files were identified, including 10 605 patients with a HER2-negative status. Of these, 3426 received paclitaxel and bevacizumab (2127) or paclitaxel (1299) as first-line chemotherapy. OS adjusted for major prognostic factors was significantly longer in the paclitaxel and bevacizumab group compared with paclitaxel [hazard ratio (HR) 0.672, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.601–0.752; median survival time 27.7 versus 19.8 months]. Results were consistent in all supportive analyses (using a propensity score for adjustment and as a matching factor for nested case–control analyses) and sensitivity analyses. Similar results were observed for the adjusted PFS, favoring the combination (HR 0.739, 95% CI 0.672–0.813; 8.1 versus 6.4 months). Conclusions In this large-scale, real-life setting, patients with HER2-negative MBC who received paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy had a significantly better OS and PFS than those receiving paclitaxel. Despite robust methodology, real-life data are exposed to important potential biases, and therefore, results need to be treated with caution. Our data cannot therefore support extension of current use of bevacizumab in MBC.