Search

ABSTRACTObjectives: To test the feasibility of an evidence-based protocol for procedural sedation in adults at our emergency department, using a mixture of ketamine and propofol (‘ketofol’) in a 1 to 4 ratio. We hypothesize that the protocol is safe and effective and can facilitate procedural sedation.Methods: During 14 months, adults in need of procedural sedation at our university hospital emergency department were included in a prospective convenience sample study. Patients with important comorbidity were discussed with the anaesthesiology department for feasibility of sedation in the emergency department setting. Outcome measures were procedural success, respiratory and hemodynamic events, vomiting, agitation or hallucinations, recall and physician’s satisfaction.Results: Sixty-one patients between 18 and 89 years were included. All but one procedure were successful. Six respiratory events were registered in 6 patients (9.8%). These consisted of airway obstruction alleviated by airway repositioning and without influence on vital signs except for one brief episode of desaturation. Neither hemodynamic events nor vomiting were reported. Five patients (8.2%) experienced pleasant hallucinations and one patient (1.6%) became agitated upon awakening but recovered rapidly without medication. Three patients (4.9%) had recall and physician satisfaction rate was 93.4%.Conclusion: A feasibility trial of an implemented protocol for ketofol procedural sedation in adults showed only minor respiratory events, a low incidence of agitation or hallucinations, minimal recall and a high success and physician satisfaction rate. Despite a non-consecutive and limited sample used, ketofol in a 1 to 4 ratio appears safe and effective for use in the emergency department.

We describe a nonlethal, delayed onset case of combined acute inhalation of hydrofluoric acid (HFA) and nitric acid (NA) together with a review of the literature. Our patient was exposed to fumes of a 12% HFA and 22% NA solution in a closed environment and suffered during several months after the incident from exertional dyspnoea but recovered completely. Since HFA and NA are dangerous and widely used substances, preparedness for exposure is mandatory. After inhalational exposure, the principles of decontamination with attention to treatment of the skin for HFA burns together with general medical incident management should be applied. The severity of combined NA and HFA intoxication depends on the concentration, the nature of the contact and the duration of exposure but other factors may also be involved. Therapy resistant hypoxia and death have been reported in the literature. Inhalation injury from HFA alone is rare but systemic toxicity should be anticipated. Calcium is advocated as the cornerstone of local and systemic therapy. NA inhalation alone is very rare and causes heavy pulmonary irritation. Massive pulmonary secretions seem a sign of very severe intoxication and treatment appears to be mainly supportive.