Search

This study was designed to evaluate whether decreasing circulating progesterone (P4) or increasing circulating estradiol-17beta (E2) near the time of artificial insemination (AI) in an Ovsynch protocol would increase pregnancies per AI (P/AI) in lactating dairy cows. Six hundred nineteen lactating Holstein cows (n = 772 inseminations) received Ovsynch (GnRH-7 d-PGF(2alpha)-56 h-GnRH-16 h-timed AI). Cows were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial experiment of 4 treatments to receive or not receive 25 mg of PGF(2alpha) 24 h after the standard PGF(2alpha) of Ovsynch, or 0.5 mg of E2 at the time of the final GnRH of Ovsynch, or both. Blood samples were collected 24 h after normal PGF(2alpha) and at final GnRH to evaluate circulating P4. Ovarian ultrasound was done at final GnRH to determine preovulatory follicle size. Ovulation was confirmed by ultrasound 5 d after AI. Treatment with additional PGF(2alpha) increased the percentage of cows that had complete luteal regression (95.6%) compared with control cows (84.6%). In contrast, additional PGF(2alpha) had no detectable effect on P/AI (control = 41.5% vs. + PGF(2alpha) = 44.7%). Supplementation with E2 increased expression of estrus (84.4 vs. 37.2%), but had no effect on overall fertility and even tended to have a negative effect on fertility in cows that ovulated to the second GnRH (control = 51.5% vs. +E2 = 44.0%). Thus, additional treatments with PGF(2alpha) or E2 during Ovsynch can be used to increase synchronization and expression of estrus during Ovsynch, although the lack of improvement in fertility makes these treatments unwarranted.

Our objective was to determine the accuracy of identifying noncycling lactating dairy cows before the application of a timed artificial insemination (AI) protocol [with or without progesterone supplementation via a controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) insert and 2 different timings of AI] by using heatmount detectors and a single ovarian ultrasound examination. At 6 locations in the Midwest, 1,072 cows were enrolled in a Presynch protocol (2 injections of PGF(2alpha) 14 d apart), with the second injection administered 14 d before initiating the Ovsynch protocol (injection of GnRH 7 d before and 48 h after PGF(2alpha) injection, with timed AI at 0 or 24 h after the second GnRH injection). Heatmount detectors were applied to cows just before the first Presynch injection, assessed 14 d later at the second Presynch injection (replaced when activated or missing), and reassessed at initiation of the Ovsynch protocol. Ovaries were examined for the presence of a corpus luteum (CL) by ultrasound before the initiation of treatment. Treatments were assigned to cows based on the presence or absence of a CL detected by ultrasound: 1) no CL + no CIDR; 2) no CL + CIDR insert for 7 d; and 3) CL present. Further, alternate cows within the 3 treatments were assigned to be inseminated concurrent with the second GnRH injection of Ovsynch (0 h) or 24 h later. Pregnancy was diagnosed at 33 and 61 d after the second GnRH injection. By using low (<1 ng/mL) concentrations of progesterone in serum as the standard for noncycling status, heatmount detectors were activated on a large percentage of noncycling cows (>60%), whereas the single ultrasound examination incorrectly classified noncycling cows only 21% of the time. Conversely, cycling cows (progesterone > or =1 ng/mL) were correctly identified 70 to 78% of the time by heatmount detectors, but 85 to 92% were correctly identified by ultrasound. Overall accuracy of heatmount detectors and ultrasound was 71 and 84%, respectively. Application of progesterone to cows without a CL at the time of the first injection of GnRH reduced the incidence of ovulation but increased the proportions of pregnancies per AI at d 33 or 61 compared with nontreated cows without a CL at the onset of the Ovsynch protocol. Percentages of cows pregnant and pregnancy survival did not differ for cows having a CL before treatment compared with those not having a CL and treated with progesterone. Compared with no response, when a follicle ovulated in response to the first GnRH injection, percentage of cows becoming pregnant after the timed AI increased from 33.3 to 41.6%. Timing of AI at 0 or 24 h after the second GnRH injection did not alter pregnancies per AI, but cows having luteal activity before treatment had improved pregnancies per AI compared with noncycling cows. We conclude that identifying noncycling cows by ultrasound was more accurate than by heatmount detectors. Subsequent progesterone treatment of previously cycling cows not having a CL at the onset of Ovsynch increased the proportion of pregnant cows, equal to that of cows having a CL but not treated with progesterone.

Based on previous research, we hypothesized that Cosynch at 72 h [GnRH-7 d-PGF(2alpha)-72 h-GnRH + artificial insemination (AI)] would result in a greater number of pregnancies per AI (P/AI) than Cosynch at 48 h. Further, we hypothesized that P/AI would be improved to a greater extent when GnRH was administered at 56 h after PGF(2alpha) before AI at 72 h due to a more optimal interval between the LH surge and AI. Nine hundred twenty-seven lactating dairy cows (n = 1,507 AI) were blocked by pen, and pens rotated through treatments. All cows received GnRH followed 7 d later by PGF(2alpha) and then received one of the following: 1) GnRH + timed AI 48 h after PGF(2alpha) (Cosynch-48); 2) GnRH 56 h after PGF(2alpha) + timed AI 72 h after PGF(2alpha) (Ovsynch-56); or 3) GnRH + timed AI 72 h after PGF(2alpha) (Cosynch-72). Pregnancy diagnoses were performed by ultrasound at 31 to 33 d post-AI and again at 52 to 54 d post-AI. Overall P/AI were similar for the Cosynch-48 (29.2%) and Cosynch-72 (25.4%) groups. The Ovsynch-56 group had a greater P/AI (38.6%) than Cosynch-48 or Cosynch-72. Presynchronized first-service animals had greater P/AI than cows at later services in Cosynch-48 (36.2 vs. 23.0%) and Ovsynch-56 (44.8 vs. 32.7%) but not in Cosynch-72 (24.6 vs. 26.2%). Similarly, primiparous cows had greater P/AI than multiparous cows in Cosynch-48 (34.1 vs. 22.9%) and Ovsynch-56 (41.3 vs. 32.6%), but not Cosynch-72 (29.8 vs. 25.3%). In conclusion, we found no advantage to Cosynch at 72 h vs. 48 h. In contrast, we found a clear advantage to treating with GnRH at 56 h, 16 h before a 72-h AI, probably because of more-optimal timing of AI before ovulation.