Search

Hemorrhage, and particularly noncompressible torso hemorrhage remains a leading cause of potentially preventable prehospital death from trauma in the United States and globally. A subset of severely injured patients either die in the field or develop irreversible hemorrhagic shock before they can receive hospital definitive care, resulting in poor outcomes. The focus of this opinion paper is to delineate (a) the need for existing trauma systems to adapt so that potentially life-saving advanced resuscitation and truncal hemorrhage control interventions can be delivered closer to the point-of-injury in select patients, and (b) a possible mechanism through which some trauma systems can train and incorporate select prehospital advanced resuscitative care teams to deliver those interventions., Competing Interests: No financial conflicts of interest for any author. ZQ is the medical director of the RAPToR course but receives no financial benefit or contribution from this role.

Background: Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) affects as many as 50% of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors, and symptoms can persist for months to years. When psychological symptoms are experienced by patients' loved ones, this is termed PICS-family (PICS-F). Patients with these syndromes represent a frequently underrecognised and suboptimally managed cohort., Objective: The aim of this article is to outline the key aspects of screening and primary care management, providing an evidence-based framework for general practitioners (GPs)., Discussion: PICS screening is not well defined. The breadth of symptoms, along with the absence of a national consensus, renders in-depth assessment a significant undertaking. Community management relies on a coordinated effort from the whole multidisciplinary team, spearheaded by the GP, and focuses on three key areas: 'information and education', 'assessment and therapy' and 'personal support'. Collaboration between key stakeholders is needed to improve outcomes in this hitherto underrecognised patient population.

Background: Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) refers to a constellation of cognitive, psychiatric and physical symptoms experienced by patients during and following a period of critical illness. As many as 50% of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors are affected, and symptoms can persist for months to years. When psychological symptoms are experienced by patients' loved ones, this is termed PICS-family (PICS-F)., Objective: The aim of this article is to summarise the key facets of PICS and PICS-F with a focus on incidence and pathophysiology.  DISCUSSION: The amalgam of symptoms in PICS has a profound impact on the quality of life of affected ICU survivors. The number of patients with PICS is expected to rise considerably as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Primary care practitioners are ideally situated to assist in early diagnosis and treatment.

Objective: Air medical transport of patients with known or suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) likely represents a high-risk exposure to crew members as aircraft cabins are quite small resulting in close personal contact. The actual risk to medical crew members is not known., Methods: We conducted an institutional review board-exempt, retrospective study of air medical transport of patients with known or suspected COVID-19 by 8 programs in the Four Corners Region to determine the number of symptomatic COVID-19 among air medical crew members compared to total exposure time. All programs used similar routine personal protective equipment (PPE), including N-95 masks and eye protection. Total exposure time was considered from time of first patient contact until handoff at a receiving hospital., Results: There were 616 air transports: 62% by fixed-wing and 38% by rotor-wing aircraft between March 15 and September 6, 2020. Among transported patients, 407 (66%) were confirmed COVID+ and 209 (34%) were under investigation. Patient contact time ranged from 38 to 432 minutes with an average of 140 minutes. The total exposure time for medical crew was 2924 hours; exposure time to confirmed COVID+ patients was 2008 hours. Only 30% of patients were intubated, and the remainder had no oxygen (8%), low-flow nasal cannula (42%), mask (11%), high-flow nasal cannula (4.5%), and continuous positive airway pressure or bilevel positive airway pressure (3.5%). Two flight crew members out of 108 developed COVID that was presumed related to work., Conclusions: Air medical transport of patients with known or suspected COVID-19 using routine PPE is considered effective for protecting medical crew members, even when patients are not intubated. This has implications for health care personnel in any setting that involves care of patients with COVID-19 in similarly confined spaces., Competing Interests: All authors have affirmed they have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© 2021 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians.)

Objectives: Health care workers experience an uncertain risk of aerosol exposure during patient oxygenation. To improve our understanding of these risks, we sought to measure aerosol production during various approaches to oxygenation in healthy volunteers in an emergency department., Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in an empty patient room in an academic ED. The room was 10 ft. long x 10 ft. wide x 9 ft. tall (total volume 900 ft 3 ) with positive pressure airflow (1 complete turnover of air every 10 minutes). Five oxygenation conditions were used: humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) at 3 flow rates [15, 30, and 60 liters per minute (LPM)], non-rebreather mask (NRB) at 1 flow rate (15 LPM), and closed-circuit continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) using the ED ventilator; in all cases a simple procedural mask was used. The NRB and HFNC at 30 LPM maneuvers were also repeated without the procedural mask, and CPAP was applied both with and without a filter. Each subject then sequentially underwent 8 total oxygenation conditions, always in the same order. Each oxygenation condition was performed with the participant on a standard ED bed. Particles were measured by laser aerosol spectrometer, with the detector sampling port positioned directly over the center of the bed, 0.35 meters away and at a 45-degree angle from the subject's mouth. Each approach to oxygenation was performed for 10 minutes, followed by a 20-minute room washout (≈ 2 complete room air turnovers). Particle counts were summated for 2 size ranges (150-300 nm and 0.5-2.0 μm) and compared before, during, and after each of the 8 oxygenation conditions., Results: Eight adult subjects were enrolled (mean age 42 years, body mass index 25). All subjects completed 8 oxygenation procedures (64 total). Mean particle counts per minute across all oxygenation procedures was 379 ± 112 (mean ± SD) for smaller aerosols (150-300 nm) and 9.3 ± 4.6 for larger aerosols (0.5-2.0 μm). HFNC exhibited a flow-dependent increase in particulate matter (PM) generation-at 60 LPM, HFNC had a substantial generation of small (55% increase) and large particles (70% increase) compared to 15 LPM. CPAP was associated with lowered small and large particle generation (≈ 10-15% below baseline for both sizes of PM). A patient mask limited particle generation with the NRB, where it was associated with a reduction in small and large particulates (average 40% and 20% lower, respectively)., Conclusion: Among 3 standard oxygenation procedures, higher flow rates generally were associated with greater production of both small and large aerosols. A patient mask lowered aerosol counts in the NRB only. Protocol development for oxygenation application should consider these factors to increase health care worker safety., (© 2021 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians.)

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival continues to be dismal with the only recent improvement being that of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), augmented by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Minimizing time until initiation of E-CPR is critical to improve neurologically intact survival. Bringing E-CPR to the patient rather than requiring transport to the emergency department may increase the number of patients eligible for E-CPR and the chances for a good outcome. We developed a out-of-hospital E-CPR (P-ECMO) program that includes the novel use of a hand-crank and emergency medical services (EMS) providers as first assistants. Here, we report the first P-ECMO procedure in North America for refractory ventricular fibrillation involving a 65-year-old male patient who was cannulated in the field within the recommended 60-minute low-flow window and transported to our institution where he underwent coronary stenting. Details of program design and the procedure used may allow other systems to consider implementation of a P-ECMO program., (© 2020 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Emergency Physicians.)

We report a case of lingual ischemia and swelling in an elderly stroke patient from prolonged insertion of a FastrachTM Laryngeal Mask Airway ® following a failed Emergency Department intubation. Simple suggestions to mitigate such injury are provided.

Objectives: The authors sought to compare ondansetron and promethazine among emergency department (ED) patients with undifferentiated nausea. The hypothesis was that ondansetron was not inferior to promethazine and that rates of adverse effects were similar., Methods: This was a randomized double-blind noninferiority clinical trial conducted in an urban academic ED. A convenience sample of nonpregnant adults with at least 40 mm of self-reported nausea measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) were enrolled. Patients who had already received more than 1 L of intravenous fluid or an antiemetic agent were excluded. Subjects were block-randomized in groups of 10 to either 4 mg of ondansetron or 25 mg of promethazine delivered intravenously. The primary outcome was change in nausea over 30 minutes. The authors used a 15-mm margin of noninferiority. Secondary endpoints included changes in anxiety, sedation, and other adverse effects. Analyses included t-tests, tests for proportions, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)., Results: A total of 120 subjects completed the study, 60 in each arm. Baseline nausea, anxiety, and sedation scores were similar. Ondansetron and promethazine reduced nausea similarly (ondansetron -34 mm, promethazine -36 mm; difference -2 mm; 95% CI = -13 to 8 mm). The reduction in anxiety was similar (ondansetron -13 mm, promethazine -14 mm; difference -1 mm; 95% CI = -10 to 10 mm). Promethazine was associated with significantly more sedation than ondansetron (ondansetron 5 mm, promethazine 19 mm; difference 14 mm; 95% CI = 5 to 24 mm). There were no cases of akathisia in the ondansetron group and 2 cases in the promethazine group., Conclusions: Promethazine and ondansetron have similar efficacy in reducing nausea among ED patients. Change in anxiety was similar, but promethazine was associated with greater sedation.

Objective: During August of each year, thousands of Nepalese religious pilgrims ascend from 2050 m to 4500 m in 1 to 3 days. Our objectives were to evaluate the incidence of acute mountain sickness (AMS) among this large group of native people, to explore changes in serum electrolytes as subjects ascend to high altitude, and to attempt to determine whether decreased effective circulating volume is associated with the development of AMS., Methods: This was a prospective study with 2 parts. In the first part, demographic, physiologic, and laboratory data were collected from a cohort of 34 pilgrims at both moderate (2050 m) and high altitude (4500 m). Changes that occurred with ascent were compared in subjects who did and did not develop AMS. The second part was a cross sectional study of a different group of 57 pilgrims at the high-altitude site to further determine variables associated with AMS., Results: In the cohort of 34 subjects, Lake Louise score, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), BUN:creatinine ratio, and pH increased at high altitude, whereas oxygen saturation, bicarbonate, creatinine, and PCO2 decreased. Sixteen of these 34 subjects (42%) were diagnosed with AMS; these patients had a statistically significantly lower hematocrit, oxygen saturation, and self-reported water consumption than those without AMS. Of the 57 subjects enrolled in the cross sectional study, 31 (54%) were diagnosed with AMS. These pilgrims had higher heart rates and BUNs than did their non-AMS counterparts., Conclusions: Fifty-two percent of the subjects developed AMS. With ascent to altitude, subjects showed some evidence of decreased effective circulating volume, though there were no clinically significant changes. The data did not show whether decreased circulating volume is a significant risk factor in the development of AMS at high altitude.