Search

Introduction. This study aimed to estimate the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among pregnant women during the first pandemic wave in Italy, and to describe CO-VID-19 disease characteristics and maternal and perinatal outcomes. Materials and methods. National population-based prospective cohort study collecting information on women with SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, confirmed within 7 days from hospital admission. Results. The national SARS-CoV-2 rate was 6.04 per 1,000 births (95% CI 5.62-6.49) among pregnant women and 7.54 (95% CI 7.47-7.61) among women in reproductive age. 72.1% of the cohort developed mild COVID-19 disease without pneumonia nor need for ventilatory support. Severe disease was significantly associated with women’s previous comorbidities (OR 2.55; 95% CI 0.98-6.90), obesity (OR 4.76; 95% CI 1.79-12.66) and citizenship from High Migration Pressure Countries (OR 3.43; 95% CI 1.27-9.25). Conclusions. During the first pandemic wave in Italy, the SARS-CoV-2 rate among pregnant women was lower compared to that detected among women of reproductive age, and risks of severe COVID-19 disease and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were rare.

Camelobaetidius metae Salinas-Jimenez & Boldrini, sp. nov. (Figs. 1���11) Diagnosis. Nymphs: 1) labrum narrowly rounded anteriorly (Fig. 2); 2) incisors of right mandible with eleven denticles (Fig. 5a); 3) segment II of labial palp with a short rounded distomedial projection (Fig. 7); 4) gills absent at the bases of coxae; 5) outer margin of forefemur with a row of about 23 long, spine-like setae (Fig. 8); 6) tarsal claws with ten denticles (Fig. 8a); 7) posterior margin of tergum IV with truncate spines (Fig. 9); 8) terminal filament almost as long as cerci. Description. Nymph. Length of body: 3.5���4.0 mm; length of antennae: 1.0��� 1.2 mm; length of cerci: 1.0 mm; length of terminal filament: 0.8 mm. Head (Fig. 1). Light brown. Antennae light brown. Lateral branch of epicranial suture sinuous. Labrum (Fig. 2). Narrowly rounded anteriorly, broader than long. Length about 0.6�� maximum width; lateral and anterolateral margins with long, fine, bifid and pectinate setae; medially with fine, bifid and pectinate setae. Dorsally with three short, fine, simple setae scattered over basal area; dorsolateral arc of setae with two long, fine, apically pointed setae in lateral region. Hypopharynx (Fig. 3). Lingua shorter than superlingua, apex rounded, with tuft of short, fine, simple setae. Superlingua not expanded, with fine, simple setae scattered over lateral and distal margins. Left mandible (Fig. 4). Incisors with seven denticles (Fig. 4a). Prostheca robust, apically denticulate. Margin between prostheca and mola without setae; subtriangular process wide; setae absent from apex of mola. Right mandible (Fig. 5). Incisors with eleven denticles (Fig. 5a). Prostheca slender, apically denticulate; margin between prostheca and mola with two fine simple setae; setae present at apex of mola. Maxilla (Fig. 6). Inner dorsal row of setae with three denti-setae; two pectinate denti-setae and one apical dentiseta at same orientation of canines. Medial protuberance of galea with 2 long, fine and simple setae. Maxillary palp 1.1�� length of galea-lacinia. Palp segment II length subequal to length of segment I. Fine and simple setae scattered over segment II of maxillary palp. Labium (Fig. 7). Glossa shorter than paraglossa; inner margin with nine spine-like setae increasing in length distally; apex with two long, spine-like setae; outer margin with three long, spine-like setae; ventral surface with three short, fine, simple setae. Paraglossa sub-rectangular, curved inward; apex with two rows of long, fine, simple setae; ventral surface with row of four long, fine, spine-like setae; dorsal surface with two fine, spine-like setae near apex. Palp segment II with distomedial projection short and rounded; dorsally with row of three long, spine-like setae; ventrally with three simple spine-like setae. Palp segment III oblong, length 1.3�� width, with scattered simple setae and spine-like setae. Thorax ( Fig. 1). Light brown; metanotum with anterior region brown. Hind wing pad present. Gills absent from bases of coxae. Femur, tibia and tarsi light brown. Tibia I 0.9�� length of femur I; tibia II 0.8�� length of femur II; tibia III 0.8�� length of femur III. Tarsi I and II each 0.5�� length of respective femur; tarsi III 0.4�� length of femur III. Forefemur (Fig. 8) length about 3.4�� maximum width; outer margin with row of about 23 long, spine-like setae; inner margin with three short, fine, spine-like setae. Foretibia outer margin with few fine, simple setae; inner margin with three short, spine-like setae; anterior apex with two spine-like setae; patella-tibial suture present. Tarsal claws with 10 denticles each (Fig. 8a). Mid femur length about 2.6�� maximum width; outer margin with row of about 9 long, spine-like setae. Hind femur length about 3�� maximum width; outer margin with row of about 14 long, spinelike setae. Abdomen (Fig. 1). Coloration light brown, but segment VIII lighter. Segment X with cross-like color pattern. Posterior margin of tergum IV with truncate spines (Fig. 9). Gills oval. Gills IV (Fig. 10) light brown; margins with narrow spines intercalating short, fine, simple setae; tracheae pigmented. Gill I 1.4�� length of segment II; gill IV 1.8�� length of segment V; gill VII 1.4�� length of segment VIII. Paraproct (Fig. 11) with two spines near inner margin; without shagreened area. Cerci light brown with brown band at mid length; outer and inner margins of terminal filament and inner margins of cerci with tufts of long, simple setae; outer margins of cerci with spines at apex of each segment. Etymology. The specific epithet is an arbitrary combination of letters referring to Meta, the Colombian state where this species was found. Distribution. Thusfar, the species has been found only in the R��o Orotoy, in the Orinoco River basin of Meta, Colombia (Fig. 12). Comments. The general shape of the labial palp of Camelobaetidius metae is similar to that found in C. carolinae Boldrini & Pes, 2014, C. cruzi Boldrini & Pes, 2014 and C. matilei Thomas & P��ru, 2003. Camelobaetidius metae, however, can be distinguished from C. carolinae by the size of the denticles on the tarsal claws, with the latter species having the first denticle distinctly longer than others, while the denticles in C. metae are all similar in length. Camelobaetidius metae is distinguished from C. cruzi by the shape of labial palp segment II, which is subquandrangular in C. cruzi versus oblong in C. metae. Camelobaetidius metae is distinguished from C. matilei by the hind wing, which is present in C. metae but absent in C. matilei. Furthermore, C. metae presents an outer margin of the forefemur with a row of 23 clavate setae and a posterior margin of tergum IV with truncate spines, while C. carolinae presents an outer margin of the forefemur with a row of 18 long, spine-like setae and a posterior margin of tergum IV with rounded spines; C. cruzi presents an outer margin of the forefemur with a row of nine long, spinelike setae and the posterior margin of tergum IV with rounded spines, and C. matilei presents an outer margin of the forefemur with a row of three long, spine-like setae and a posterior margin of tergum IV with truncate spines. Material examined. Holotype: Male mature nymph (mounted on slides, medium Euparal), Colombia, Meta, Castilla La Nueva, Vereda Cacayal, R��o Orotoy, 3��52���9.0��� N, 73��38���18.6��� W, 419m, 02/vi/2011, Osorio D, Caro C, cols (CEBUC). Paratypes: fourteen mature nymphs (four specimens mounted on slides, medium: Euparal), same data as holotype (seven specimens deposited in CEBUC and seven specimens deposited in MIUQ). Additional material: 35 nymphs, same data as holotype deposited in MIUQ. Habitat (Fig. 13). The nymphs were collected from the R��o Orotoy, which is in the Orinoco River basin. The stream is meandering and open, with clear water. It is 20 m wide, has an average depth of 0.68 m and discharge of 2.7 m 3 /s for the sampling season (high water). The stream bed is composed of boulders and sandy clay substrate. The riverbank presents secondary vegetation, typical of a foothill forest. The water temperature was 25��C; pH was 6.4 units; dissolved oxygen content was high (9.0 mg/l), conductivity was low (16 ��S/cm)., Published as part of Salinas-Jimenez, Luis Gonzalo, Boldrini, R., Osorio-Ramirez, Diana Paola, Caro, Clara Ines & Rojas-Pe��a, Jose Ismael, 2019, A new species of Camelobaetidius Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae), from the Colombian Orinoco River basin, pp. 367-374 in Zootaxa 4656 (2) on pages 368-373, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4656.2.9, http://zenodo.org/record/3368740, {"references":["Boldrini, R & Pes, A. M. O. (2014) Five new species of Camelobaetidius Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae), and redescription of Camelobaetidius mexicanus (Traver & Edmunds, 1968). Zootaxa, 3796 (3), 545 - 567. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3796.3. 8","Thomas, A., Peru, N. & Horeau, V. (2003) Les Ephemeres de la Guyane Francaise. 8. Description de Camelobaetidiusmatilei n. sp. et cle de determination de especesguyanensis de ce genre (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Ephemera, 3 (2), 123 - 133."]}

We describe the results of a therapeutic approach with a pediatric BEP regimen (bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin) from the Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP) study on testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT).

Ulmeritoides passorum Gama-Neto & Hamada, 2014 (Fig. 14���24) Diagnoses. Female imago:1) large body size (> 7.7 mm); 2) base of wings tinged with brown (Fig. 14). Nymph: 1) medial denticle of anteromedial emargination of labrum much larger than others; 2) tusk on inner margin of maxillae hardly developed; 3) posterolateral projections present on abdominal segments II���IX; 4) lines of pectinate setae on ventral surface of tibia III forming one main line. Female imago. Length: body: 7.7���8.8 mm; forewings: 9.3���10.1mm; hind wings: 1.4���1.5 mm. General color light brown (Figs. 14), darker in the living specimen (Fig. 24). Head (Fig. 14): Washed with black. Scape and pedicel brown; ocelli white, blackish basally. Thorax (Fig. 14): Nota with anteronotal protuberance, medioscutum, submedioscutum, posterior scutal protuberance and scutellum brown; sterna brown.. Wings (Figs. 15, 16, 16 a): membrane of forewing hyaline, wing base brownish; main longitudinal and intercalaries veins dark brown, cross-veins pale yellow; one cross-vein basal to bulla. Membrane of hind wings (Figs. 16, 16 a) hyaline; longitudinal veins brownish, cross-veins pale yellow. Legs: Fore femur brown, fore tibia and fore tarsus dark brown Abdomen (Fig. 14): when without eggs, light brown. Nymph. Length: Body: 6.9���7.3 mm. Nymphal exuviae: Tibia I: 1.2 mm; Tibia II: 1.2 mm; Tibia III: 1.4 mm. General coloration (Fig. 17): Brown. Labrum (Fig. 18): Subrectangular, broader than long; with one middle large and apically rounded denticle. Mandibles: Apical 1/2 of right mandible with inner and outer margin with fine long setae; inner and outer incisive, respectively, with two and three denticles. Left mandible (Fig. 19) with outer margin with fine long setae; inner and outer incisive with three denticles. Maxilla (Fig. 20, 20 a): Tusk on inner apical margin hardly developed; one robust and fifteen subapical pectinate setae. Labium: Segment I with fine, simple setae scattered on inner margin; and outer margin with a row of setae increasing in length toward apex, and pectinate, long setae near apex. Segment II with fine, simple setae scattered on inner and outer margin; dorsally with a diagonal row of nine simple setae. Segment III with fine, simple setae scattered on inner and outer margin. Thorax: Light brown. Legs: Light brown. Foretibia and foretarsi brown. Leg I (Fig. 21): Femur outer margin with long, pectinate setae; dorsal surface with long, pectinate setae near outer margin, and with spine-like setae and short, fine, pectinate setae near inner margin, and with spine like setae on midline. Tibia inner margin with a row of long, pectinate setae; dorsal and ventral surface with fine, long, simple setae near outer margin, and with short, fine pectinate setae near inner margin. Tarsi inner margin with a row of short, pectinate setae, and outer margin with fine, long simple setae. Claws with eight denticles increasing in length toward apex. Leg II (Fig. 22): Femur inner margin with a row of spine-like setae; outer margin with long pectinate setae and a row of spine-like setae; dorsal surface with spine-like setae on margins and at the midline. Tibia inner margin with a row of long, pectinate setae; dorsal and ventral surface with fine, long, simple setae near outer margin; dorsal surface with six spine-like setae near inner margin. Leg III (Fig. 23): Femur outer and inner margin with a row of spine-like setae; dorsal surface with spine-like setae on margins and at the midline. Tibia inner and outer margins with a row spine-like setae; dorsal surface with a row of spine-like setae near inner margin; ventral surface with one row of pectinate setae. Abdomen: Terga brown. Posterolateral projections lighter, present on abdominal segments II-IX. Sterna brown. Gills gray, tracheae and fimbriae gray-violet. Caudal filaments light brown. Distribution. Brazil: Roraima: Amajari and Pacaraima. Material examined. Four female imago, Brazil, Roraima, Amajari, Serra do Tepequ��m, Igarap�� Cocal, 3��73���N/ 61��72���W, 01.xi.2014, Boldrini, R. coll (UFRR). Two nymphs (one mature nymph), Brazil, Roraima, Amajari, Serra do Tepequ��m, Igarap�� Cocal, 3��73���N/ 61��72���W, 01.xi.2014, Boldrini, R. coll (UFRR). One immature nymph, Brazil, Roraima, Amajari, Serra do Tepequ��m, Igarap�� Cocal, 3��73���N/ 61��72���W, 18.xii.2014, Boldrini, R., Barroso, P.C.S. colls (UFRR). One male imago, Brazil, Roraima, Amajari, Serra do Tepequ��m, Igarap�� Cocal, 3��73���N/ 61��72���W, 18.xii.2014, Boldrini, R coll (UFRR). Three male imago, Brazil, Roraima, Pacaraima, Igarap�� Sam��, 4��28���30.8������N / 61��09���44.4������W, 12.vi.2014, Boldrini, R. coll (UFRR). Three male imago, Brazil, Roraima, Pacaraima, Igarap�� Sam��, 4��28���30.8������N / 61��09���44.4������W, 11.vi.2014, Boldrini, R. coll (UFRR). One male imago (reared), Brazil, Roraima, Amajari, Serra do Tepequ��m, Igarap�� Cocal, 3��73���N/ 61��72���W, 18.xii.2014, Boldrini, R. coll (UFRR). Comments. The adults of U. passorum have similar characters to U. flavopedes adults. The males share the apex of the penis lobe rounded, and males and females share the forewing with costal and subcostal areas hyaline. Both species can be found in savanna areas in the Roraima State, but the U. passorum specimens can be found at altitudes>300 meters above the sea level, while U. flavopedes can be found in areas near 100 meters above the sea. The adults of U. passorum are easily recognized by the presence of brownish wing bases., Published as part of Boldrini, R. & Lima, L. R. C., 2017, New species and stages description of Ulmeritoides Traver, 1959 (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) from Roraima State, Northern Brazil, pp. 385-394 in Zootaxa 4282 (2) on pages 390-393, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4282.2.11, http://zenodo.org/record/818787, {"references":["Gama Neto, J. L. & Hamada, N. (2014) Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera) of the Serra do Tepequem, Roraima State, Brazil: new records and description of two new species. Zootaxa, 3900 (2), 279 - 286."]}

Ulmeritoides amajari sp. nov. (Figs. 1���13) Diagnoses. Ulmeritoides amajari sp. nov. can be separated from the other species of the genus by the following combination of characters. In the imago: 1) forewings hyaline, base brown and without dark spots in bullae in Sc and R1 (Fig. 4); 2) one cross-veins basal to bulla in forewings (Fig. 4); 3) abdominal color pattern as in Fig. 1; 4) penis lobe ending in an rounded apical projection (Fig. 7). In the female: forewings hyaline, base brown and without dark spots in bullae in Sc and R1; 2) one cross-veins basal to bulla in forewings; 3) abdominal color pattern as in Fig. 2. In the nymph: 1) medial denticle on anteromedian emargination of labrum much larger than others (Figs. 8, 8 a); 2) tusk on inner margin of maxillae well developed (Figs. 10, 10 a); 3) dorsum of fore femur with numerous, acute spines (Fig. 11); 4) lines of pectinate setae on ventral surface of tibia III forming one main line (Fig. 13). Male Imago. Length: body: 5.5���6.2 mm; forewings: 5.7���6.5 mm; hind wings: 1.0��� 1.1 mm. General coloration brown (Fig. 1). Head: flagellum light brown; ocelli white, reddish brown basally; upper portion of eyes reddish, lower portion blackish. Thorax: pro-, meso- and metanotum brown; pro-, meso-, and metasternum reddish brown. Wings (Figs. 4, 5, 5 a): membrane of forewings (Fig. 4) hyaline, wing base light brown; main longitudinal and intercalaries veins light brown, cross-veins hyaline; one cross-vein basal to bulla. Membrane of hind wings (Figs. 5, 5 a) hyaline; longitudinal and cross-veins hyaline. Legs (Fig. 1): Yellowish; middle region of all femora with short blackish mark. Leg I: femur washed with reddish brown; tibia washed with light brown, subapical portion of tibia with a black band; tarsi II and III washed with light brown. Tibia II and III with a reddish brown band apically. Abdomen (Fig. 1): Terga reddish brown. Terga I, II and III darker. Terga I���VIII with lateral light reddish brown spots. Sterna light reddish brown. Genitalia (Fig. 6): penis yellowish, washed with reddish brown basally, apex yellowish. Forceps yellowish, segment I and II washed with light brown. Apex of penis lobe ending in a inner rounded apical projection (Fig. 7), and with a lateral pointed projection (7a). [Caudal filaments broken off and lost]. Female imago. Length: body: 5.7���6.3 mm; forewings: 5.1���7.1 mm; hind wings: 1.1 mm. General color light brown (Fig. 2). Head: pedicel brown; ocelli white, blackish basally; area between lateral ocelli and eyes brown. Thorax: Lateral margins of pronotum and pleura blackish. Wings. Wings membrane hyaline. Similar to male imago. Legs (Fig. 2): light brown; middle region of all femora with short blackish marks; Leg I: femur washed with brown; tibia washed with light brown, subapical portion of tibia with a black band. Subbasal region of hind femur with a longitudinal blackish stripe. Tarsi II and III washed with black. Abdomen (Fig. 2): Terga I, II and III darker; terga I���VIII with lateral light brown spots, and terga IV���VIII with a medial light brown spots. Sterna I���III darker. [Caudal filaments broken off and lost]. Nymph. Length: body: 6.3���7.1 mm. Nymphal exuviae: Tibia I: 1.2 mm; Tibia II: 1.1 mm; Tibia III: 1.3 mm. General coloration: light brown to brown. Labrum (Figs. 8, 8 a): Subrectangular, broader than long; with one middle larger and apically rounded denticle and four inconspicuous denticles. Mandibles: Apical 1/2 of right mandible with inner and outer margin with fine long setae; inner and outer incisors with two and three denticles respectively. Apical 1/2 of left mandible (Fig. 9) with outer margin with fine long setae; inner and outer incisors with three denticles. Maxilla (Figs. 10, 10 a): Small tusk on inner apical margin present; one robust and twelve subapical pectinate setae. Labium: Segment I with fine, simple setae scattered on inner margin; outer margin with a row of setae increasing in length toward apex, long pectinate setae near apex. Segment II with fine, simple setae scattered on inner and outer margin; dorsally with a diagonal row of seven simple setae. Segment III with fine, simple setae scattered on inner and outer margin. Thorax (Fig. 3): nota light brown. Leg I (Fig. 11): Brown; subapical region of tibia dark brown. Femur outer margin with long, pectinate setae; dorsal surface with long, pectinate setae near outer margin, inner margin with spine-like pectinate setae and with spine-like setae on midline. Tibia inner margin with a row of long, pectinate setae; dorsal and ventral surface with fine, long, simple setae near outer margin, and with spine-like setae near inner margin. Tarsi inner margin with a row of spine-like setae, and outer margin with fine, long simple setae. Claws with six denticles increasing in length toward apex. Leg II (Fig. 12): Femur similar to leg I. Leg III (Fig. 13): Subapical region of tibia and tarsi dark brown. Femur outer margin with simple setae; inner margin with a row of spine-like setae. Tibia ventral surface with a row of long, pectinate setae; dorsal surface with a row of spine-like setae near inner margin; apex with five long, pectinate setae. Abdomen (Fig 3): terga brown. Posterolateral projections lighter, present on abdominal segments II-IX. Sterna light brown. Gills gray. [Caudal filaments broken off and lost]. Distribution. Brazil: Roraima: Amajari municipality. Material examined. Holotype. Male imago (reared), Brazil, Roraima, Amajari, Rio Amajari, below the bridge, 3��39���51.6������N / 61��21���32.46������W, 30.iii.2016, Boldrini, R. coll (INPA). Paratypes: Three female imago, Brazil, Roraima, Amajari, Rio Amajari, below the bridge, 3��39���51.6������N / 61��21���32.46������W, 16.ii.2016, Boldrini, R., Lima, L.R.C. coll (UFRR). Two female and one male imagos (all reared), Brazil, Roraima, Amajari, Rio Amajari, below the bridge, 3��39���51.6������N / 61��21���32.46������W, 16.ii.2016, Boldrini, R., Lima, L.R.C. colls (CZNC). Two female and three male imagos, Brazil, Roraima, Amajari, Rio Amajari, below the bridge, 3��39���51.6������N / 61��21���32.46������W, 30.iii.2016, Boldrini, R. coll (UFRR). Three imature nymphs, Brazil, Roraima, Amajari, Rio Amajari, below the bridge, 3��39���51.6������N / 61��21���32.46������W, 30.iii.2016, Boldrini, R. coll (UFRR). Etymology. Amajari, name of the river where the material was collected. Comments. The male imago of Ulmeritoides amajari sp. nov. have a forewing coloration and penis shape similar to that of the widespread species U. uruguayensis. Ulmeritoides amajari sp. nov. is distinguished from U. uruguayensis by apex of penis lobe; U. amajari sp. nov. has the apex of penis lobe ending in a inner rounded apical projection, while U. uruguayensis has the apex of penis lobe ending in a inner pointed apical projection. The nymphs of both species can be distinguished by lines of pectinate setae on ventral surface of tibia III (U. amajari has one main line, while U. uruguayensis, has two lines)., Published as part of Boldrini, R. & Lima, L. R. C., 2017, New species and stages description of Ulmeritoides Traver, 1959 (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) from Roraima State, Northern Brazil, pp. 385-394 in Zootaxa 4282 (2) on pages 386-390, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4282.2.11, http://zenodo.org/record/818787

Miroculis (Miroculis) cohnhafti sp. nov. Raimundi & Nascimento (Figs. 16���21) Diagnosis. Miroculis (Miroculis) cohnhafti sp. nov. differs from the other species of Miroculis by the following characteristics in the male imago: 1) compound eye with upper portion on a stalk of intermediate length (approximately as long as wide); 2) distomedial projection of compound eyes present (little developed in some specimens) (Fig. 16); 3) forewing with apical membrane between C and R pale (Fig. 18); 4) veins A1 and A2 free (Fig. 18); 5) forceps segment II with inner margin of apical portion broadened (Fig. 20). Description. Measurements (mm). Male imago. Body: 5.8; forewing: 4.6; angularity of cubital region 100��; hind wing: 1.2; fore leg: 4.0. Caudal filament: broken off and missing. Ratios. Wings: Forewing width 0.4 x forewing length; hind wing length 0.3 forewing wing length; hind wing width 0.46 hind wing length; fork on MA of forewing 0.5 x total length of MA. Legs: fore leg segments: 1.1: 1.00: (1.70 mm) 0.08: 0.62: 0.47: 0.26: 0.14. Genitalia: medial length of styliger plate 0.4 x maximum width of styliger plate; lateral length of styliger plate 1.0 x medial length of styliger plate; lateral length of styliger plate 0.4 x lateral length of segment IX. Forceps segment III 0.8 x segment II; segment III 0.3 x segment I; segment II 0.4 x segment I; penis length 0.9 x forceps segment I. Coloration (Figs. 17���20). Body: brownish. Head. Orangish brown, with dark brown marks ventrally. Compound eye with stalk orange, lighter toward apex; facets of upper portion orange, separated by dark brown grooves. Antenna: scape yellowish, pedicel brown and flagellum whitish translucent. Thorax: brown, sutures darker; membranous areas yellowish. Wings (Figs. 18���19): forewings with hyaline membrane; longitudinal veins brown, with C, SC and R darker; cross-veins brown, weakly developed. Hind wing with membrane hyaline; veins brown. Legs: Fore leg brownish; femur with medial blackish mark and subapical blackish band; tibia with a subapical blackish band. Mid and hind legs: coxae brown, remainder whitish brown; femora with a medial gray mark and subapical blackish band; tibiae with a subapical blackish mark. Abdomen: segments I ��� VI translucent brown, remainder orangish brown; terga with dark brown marks on medial and sublateral regions. Genitalia (Figs. 20���21). Styliger plate brown, washed with orange���yellow. Forceps brown slightly washed with orange, except basal 2/3 of segment I and apical region of segment III light brown. Penis brown washed with yellow. Caudal filament: whitish brown, darker basally on each segment. Morphology: Head: posterior margin V-shaped. Compound eye with upper portion on a stalk of intermediary length (approximately as long as wide); distomedial projection of compound eyes present; dorsal surface rounded, with 11 facets on the longest row. Lower portion of compound eye elliptic. Wings: forewing with three cross veins between C and Sc basal to bulla; 11 cross veins between C and Sc; IMP connected to MP1 and MP2 by a cross vein; MP2 connected to MP1 and CuA by cross veins; CuA connected to CuP by cross vein subbasally; veins A1 and A2 free. Hind wing with apex rounded, fork of R+MA symmetric, CuP present. Legs: fore tarsal claw different, one spine-like and other rounded. Genitalia: Styliger plate with posteromedial margin concave. Forceps segment I narrowing gradually toward apex without broad basal portion; inner and outer margins undulated; forceps segment II with inner margin broadened apically. Penis broad basally, narrowing toward apex; apex bifurcated (Fig. 21): inner bifurcation short and acute; outer bifurcation longer and rounded; without row of spines on inner margin. Etymology. This species is named in honor of Mario Cohn Haft, one of the organizers of the expedition to the Serra da Mocidade. Distribution: Brazil: Roraima State. Material examined: Holotype: male imago, BRAZIL, Roraima State, Caracara�� municipality, Serra da Mocidade National Park, 01��42���21.3���N / 061��47���04.7���W, 03���04.ii. 2016, Nascimento, J.M.C. col. (INPA). Paratypes: ten male imagos (same data as holotype) (five at INPA; five at CZNC). Five male imago, BRAZIL, Roraima State, Caracara�� Caracara�� municipality, Serra da Mocidade National Park, 01��36.240"N / 061��54.370'W, 15���25.i. 2016, Boldrini, R., Barroso, P.C.S. and Xavier, F.F. col. (UFRR). Comments: Miroculis (Miroculis) cohnhafti sp. nov. shares some characteristics with Miroculis (M.) stenopterus Lima, Raimundi, Pinheiro & Salles, 2014, Miroculis (M.) marauiae Savage & Peters, 1983 and Miroculis (M.) eldorado Gama-Neto & Hamada, 2014. These four species have the upper portion of the compound eyes on a stalk, forewings are hyaline without any pigmentation, distomedial portion of styliger plate is concave, or concave to slightly straight in M. (M.) marauiae, and hind wings are hyaline, but washed with brown on the base in M. (M.) stenopterus, absent in M. (M.) marauiae and in subcostal area in M. (M.) eldorado. Otherwise, Miroculis (M.) cohnhafti sp. nov. differs from these mentioned species above by distomedial projection of compound eyes present, while it is absent in the others species., Published as part of Boldrini, R., 2017, Three new species of Miroculis from the Serra da Mocidade National Park, Roraima State, Brazil, with new records and checklist of the Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera), pp. 573-583 in Zootaxa 4317 (3) on pages 579-581, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4317.3.8, http://zenodo.org/record/884837, {"references":["Lima, L. R. C., Raimundi, E. A., Pinheiro, U. & SalleS, F. F. (2014) A new SpecieS of Miroculis EdmundS, 1963 (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) from NortheaStern Brazil. Zootaxa, 3795 (4), 441 - 448.","Gama-Neto, J. L. & Hamada, N. (2014) Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera) of the Serra do Tepequem, Roraima State, Brazil: New recordS and deScription of two new SpecieS. Zootaxa, 3900 (2), 279 - 286."]}

Simothraulopsis demerara (Traver, 1947) Distribution: Venezuela, Colombia, French Guyana and Suriname. Brazil: States of Roraima, Pará, Amazonas, Bahia, Espírito Santo, Pernambuco. Material examined: Two male imago, BRAZIL, Roraima State, Caracaraí municipality, Serra da Mocidade National Park, 01°36.240"N / 061°54.370'W, 15–25.i. 2016, Boldrini, R., Barroso, P.C.S. and Xavier, F.F. col. (UFRR). Ten male subimago, BRAZIL, Roraima State, Caracaraí municipality, Serra da Mocidade, 01°42’21.3”N / 061°47’04.7”W, 03–04.ii. 2016, Nascimento, J.M.C. col. Pennsylvania trap., Published as part of Boldrini, R., 2017, Three new species of Miroculis from the Serra da Mocidade National Park, Roraima State, Brazil, with new records and checklist of the Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera), pp. 573-583 in Zootaxa 4317 (3) on page 581, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4317.3.8, http://zenodo.org/record/884837

Paramaka convexa (Spieth, 1943) (Fig. 23) Distribution: Surinam, French Guyana, Venezuela and Colombia. Brazil: States of Roraima (new record), Pará, Mato Grosso and Bahia. Material examined: One male adult, BRAZIL, Roraima State, Caracaraí municipality, Serra da Mocidade National Park, waterfall of the Pacu river, 01°36.060'N / 061°54548'W, 15–25.i. 2016, Boldrini, R., Barroso, P.C.S. and Xavier, F.F. col. (UFRR)., Published as part of Boldrini, R., 2017, Three new species of Miroculis from the Serra da Mocidade National Park, Roraima State, Brazil, with new records and checklist of the Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera), pp. 573-583 in Zootaxa 4317 (3) on page 581, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4317.3.8, http://zenodo.org/record/884837

Miroculis (Miroculis) xavieri sp. nov. Raimundi & Boldrini (Figs. 11���15) Diagnosis. Miroculis (Miroculis) xavieri sp. nov. differs from the other species of Miroculis by the following characteristics in the male imago: 1) distomedial projection of compound eyes absent; 2) forewing with brown areas along cross veins at base from Sc to MA and at MP; hind wing brown at apex and on cross veins basally (Figs. 12���13); 3) forceps washed with dark grey on apical third of segment I, and on segment II; 4) forceps segment I with basal half broad and tapering gradually toward apex; 5) penis broad basally, narrowing gradually toward apex. Description. Measurements (mm). Male imago. Body: 5.0; forewing: 5.0; angularity of cubital region 100��; hind wing: 1.5; legs: broken off and missing except for the right foreleg. Caudal filament: 11.0. Ratios. Wings: Forewing width 0.4 x forewing length; hind wing length 0.3 forewing length; hind wing width 0.5 x hind wing length; fork on MA of forewing 0.5 x total length of MA. Genitalia: medial length of styliger plate 0.5 x maximum width of styliger plate; lateral length of styliger plate 1.2 x medial length of styliger plate; lateral length of styliger plate 1.2 x lateral length of segment IX. Forceps segment III 0.9 x segment II; segment III 0.4 x segment I; segment II 0.4 x segment I; penis length 1.0 x forceps segment I. Coloration (Figs. 11���14). Body: brownish. Head. Orange, ventrally washed with dark brown. Compound eye with stalk orange, lighter toward apex; facets of upper portion orange, separated by dark brown grooves. Antenna pale washed with brown. Thorax: brown, darker on margins. Wings (Figs. 12���13): forewings with hyaline membrane and brown clouds along cross veins at base from Sc to MA and at MP. Hind wing with hyaline membrane; brown on apex and on cross veins basally. Legs: fore leg pale with dark brown marks on the middle and apex of femur. Abdomen: terga and sterna light brown; terga I���IX with a transversal dark brown band on posterolateral portion, and brown mark on posteromedian portion of terga VII���VIII. Genitalia (Fig. 14): brown. Styliger plate washed with dark brown. Forceps washed with dark grey on apical third of segments I and II. Penis brown. Caudal filament: brown, darker basally on each segment. Morphology: Head: posterior margin V-shaped. Compound eye with upper portion on a mid-stalk (as long as wide); distomedial projection of compound eyes absent; dorsal surface rounded, with ten facets in the longest row. Lower portion of compound eye elliptic. Wings: forewing with four to five cross veins between C and Sc basal to bulla; 11���14 cross veins between C and Sc; IMP free basally; MP2 connected to base of MP1 by cross vein; CuA connected to CuP by cross vein subbasally; veins A1 and A2 connected by a cross vein subbasally. Hind wing with apex slightly acute; fork of R+MA symmetrical; CuP present. Genitalia: Styliger plate with posteromedial margin convex. Forceps segment I with basal portion broad narrowing gradually toward apex, apical third of inner margin broad; inner margin undulated. Penis broad basally, narrowing gradually toward apex (Fig. 14); apex rounded (Fig. 15); a row of spines on base of inner margin absent. Etymology: We are honoured in naming this species to our friend Francisco F. Xavier Filho, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amaz��nia, in recognition of his extensive support in field trips to collect insects in the Amazonian region of Brazil. Distribution: Brazil: Roraima State. Material examined: Holotype: male imago, BRAZIL, Roraima State, Caracara�� municipality, Serra da Mocidade National Park, 01��42"N / 61��27'W, 25.i���06.ii 2016, Mahlmann, T. col. (CZNC). Paratype: three male imago, same data as holotype (CZNC). Four male imago, BRAZIL, Roraima State, Caracara�� municipality, Serra da Mocidade National Park, 01��42"N / 061��47'W, 25.i���06.ii. 2016, Oliveira, M., Mahlmann, T. and Xavier, F.F. col. (UFRR). Comments: Miroculis (Miroculis) xavieri sp. nov. shares some characteristics with Miroculis (Miroculis) nebulosus Savage, 1987 such as, compound eye with a short stalk (length 0.5 x width), forewing with MP2 connected to MP1 by a cross vein and IMP free basally; and hind wing brown apically (Fig. 13). However, M. (M.) xavieri sp. nov. differs from M. (M.) nebulosus by having a hyaline forewing with crossveins tinged brown, base of forceps segment I with basal third portion narrowing gradually toward apex and washed with dark gray on apical third, and penis as long as forceps segment I. Otherwise, M. (M.) nebulosus has the forewing completely washed with brown and with few hyaline areas, forceps segment I with basal third narrowing abruptly toward apex and equally pigmented as in the other segments, and penis longer than segment forceps I (1.5 x)., Published as part of Boldrini, R., 2017, Three new species of Miroculis from the Serra da Mocidade National Park, Roraima State, Brazil, with new records and checklist of the Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera), pp. 573-583 in Zootaxa 4317 (3) on pages 577-579, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4317.3.8, http://zenodo.org/record/884837, {"references":["Savage, H. M. (1987) Two new SpecieS of Miroculis from Cerro de la Neblina, Venezuela with new diStribution recordS for Miroculis fittkaui and Microphlebia surinamensis (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae). Aquatic Insects, 9, 97 - 108. httpS: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 01650428709361279"]}

Miroculis (Miroculis) mocidade sp. nov. Raimundi, Boldrini & Nascimento (Figs. 6���10) Diagnosis. Miroculis (Miroculis) mocidade sp. nov. differs from the other species of Miroculis by the following characteristics in the male imago: 1) distomedial projection of compound eyes absent; 2) forewing with distal region washed with brown, hind wing with a tiny brownish spot on the base (Fig. 8); 3) forewing with vein A1 connected to A2; 4) forceps washed with brown; 5) forceps segment I with inner basal third narrowing abruptly, and inner subapical portion well broadened (Fig. 9); 6) penis broad basally, narrowing gradually toward apex; apex rounded (Fig. 10). Description. Measurements (mm). Male imago. Body: 6.0; forewing: 5.0, angularity of cubital region 98��; hind wing: 1.2. Fore leg: broken off and missing, except for coxa, trochanter, femora and tibiae; mid leg: 2.7; hind leg: broken off and missing. Caudal filament: 11.7. Ratios. Wings: Forewing width 0.5 x forewing length; hind wing length 0.3 x forewing length; hind wing width 0.5 hind wing length; fork on MA of forewing 0.5 x total length of MA. Genitalia: medial length of styliger plate 0.4 x maximum width of styliger plate; lateral length of styliger plate 1.2 x medial length of styliger plate; lateral length of styliger plate 0.7 x lateral length of segment IX. Forceps segment III 0.9 x segment II; segment III 0.4 x segment I; segment II 0.5 x segment I; penis length 1.2 x forceps segment I. Coloration (Figs. 6���9). Body: brownish. Head. Brown. Compound eye with stalk orange, lighter toward apex; facets of upper portion orange, separated by brown grooves. Antenna: scape and pedicel brown, flagellum light brown. Thorax: brown, darker on margins. Wings (Figs. 7���8): forewings with hyaline membrane, distal region washed with brown, cross veins surrounded by small brown areas. Hind wing with hyaline membrane with a tiny brownish cloud on the base. Legs: pale; fore leg with femur and tibia washed with light brown, apex of femur with a brown band; mid leg with a brown band on apex; hind leg with a brown stripe on mid region and a brown band on apex. Abdomen: whitish washed with light brown, segments VIII���X washed with brown. Genitalia (Fig. 9): whitish washed with brown. Penis washed with dark brown. Caudal filament: whitish washed with light brown, lighter toward apex. Morphology: Head: posterior margin V-shaped. Compound eye with upper portion on a short stalk (0.5 x longer than wide); distomedial projection of compound eyes absent; dorsal surface elliptic, with ten facets in the longest row. Lower portion of compound eye elliptic. Wings: forewing with five cross veins between C and Sc basal to bulla; 14���17 cross veins between C and Sc; IMP free basally; MP2 not or weakly connected to base of MP1 by cross vein; CuA connected to CuP by a cross vein subbasally; CuP and A1 connected by a cross vein subbasally; A1 connected to A2. Hind wing with apex slightly acute; fork of R+MA symmetrical; CuP present. Genitalia: Styliger plate with posteromedial margin concave. Forceps segment I with basal third broad tapering abruptly toward apex, and inner margin with subdistomedial portion broadened; inner and outer margins undulated. Penis broad narrowing gradually toward apex; apex rounded (Fig. 10); a row of spines on base of inner margin absent. Etymology: The specific epithet of the new species derives from the locality where the imagos were collected: Serra da Mocidade National Park. Distribution: Brazil: Roraima State. Material examined: Holotype: male imago, BRAZIL, Roraima State, Caracara�� municipality, Serra da Mocidade National Park, 01��42"N / 61��27'W, 25.i���06.ii.2016, Mahlmann, T. col. (CZNC). Paratypes: one male imago, BRAZIL, Roraima State, Caracara�� municipality, Serra da Mocidade National Park, 01��42"N / 061��47'W, 25.i���06.ii.2016, Oliveira, M., Mahlmann, T. and Xavier, F.F. col. (UFRR); two male imagos, same data as holotype, except by 01��42���17.3���N / 061��47���14.1���W, 01���02.ii.2016, Nascimento, J.M.C. (INPA). Comments. Miroculis (Miroculis) mocidade sp. nov. and Miroculis (Miroculis) fittkaui Savage & Peters, 1983 share a hyaline forewing which is pigmented in some parts of membrane especially around cross veins; and forceps segment I with subdistomedial broadened (Fig. 9). However, M. (M.) mocidade sp. nov. differs from M. (M.) fittkaui by displaying the hind wing with a tiny dark mark only in the base (Fig. 8) while in M. (M.) fittkaui the dark mark is in the base and the apex; by the forceps pigmented and pale in the inner margin of apical 2/3 of forceps segment I (Fig. 9), while M. (M.) fittkaui has only apex of forceps segment I; and by the shape of forceps segment I, M. (M.) mocidade has a short subdistomedial projection, with 1/ 4x length of forceps segment I, while M. (M.) fittkaui has a large subdistomedial projection, with 2/ 3x length of forceps segment I., Published as part of Boldrini, R., 2017, Three new species of Miroculis from the Serra da Mocidade National Park, Roraima State, Brazil, with new records and checklist of the Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera), pp. 573-583 in Zootaxa 4317 (3) on pages 575-577, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4317.3.8, http://zenodo.org/record/884837

Hermanellopsis arsia Savage and Peters, 1983 (Fig. 22) Distribution: Brazil: States of Roraima (new record) and Amazonas. Material: One male subimago, BRAZIL, Roraima State, Caracara�� municipality, Serra da Mocidade, 01��42���21.3���N / 061��47���04.7���W, 03���04.ii. 2016, Nascimento, J.M.C. col. Pennsylvania trap., Published as part of Boldrini, R., 2017, Three new species of Miroculis from the Serra da Mocidade National Park, Roraima State, Brazil, with new records and checklist of the Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera), pp. 573-583 in Zootaxa 4317 (3) on page 581, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4317.3.8, http://zenodo.org/record/884837

Terpides guyanensis Demoulin, 1966 (Fig. 24) Distribution: Surinam and French Guyana. Brazil: State of Roraima. Material examined: Three nymphs, BRAZIL, Roraima State, Caracara�� municipality, Serra da Mocidade National Park, waterfall of the Pacu river, 01��36.060'N / 061��54548'W, 15���25.i. 2016, Boldrini, R., Barroso, P.C.S. and Xavier, F.F. col. (UFRR). Two nymphs, BRAZIL, Roraima State, Caracara��, Serra da Mocidade National Park, 01��42���19���N / 061��47���10���W, 0 1. ii. 2016, Nascimento, J.M.C. col. (INPA)., Published as part of Boldrini, R., 2017, Three new species of Miroculis from the Serra da Mocidade National Park, Roraima State, Brazil, with new records and checklist of the Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera), pp. 573-583 in Zootaxa 4317 (3) on page 582, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4317.3.8, http://zenodo.org/record/884837

Background. Teratomas demonstrate a benign clinical behavior, however they may recur with malignant components or as teratoma, and in a small group of patients prognosis could be fatal. After the ®rst Italian study, we collected cases of teratoma, alongside the protocol for malignant germ cell tumors. Procedure. Patients with teratoma were collected from 2004 to 2014. Teratomas were classi®ed according to the WHO classi®cations, as mature and immature. Patients with pathological aFP and/or bHCG, and those with a malignant germ cell component were not included. Results. The study enrolled 219 patients (150 mature, 69 immature teratomas) with a median age at diagnosis of 42 months. The primary sites involved were: 118 gonadal and 101 extragonadal teratomas. Two females with ovarian teratoma had a positive family history. Complete and incomplete surgeries were performed in 85% and 9% of cases. Seventeen events occurred: six females had a second metachronous tumor (5 contralateral ovarian teratoma, 1 adrenal neuroblastoma) and 11 teratomas relapsed/progressed (3 mature, 8 immature teratomas). Two patients died, one of progressive immature teratoma and one of surgical complications. At a median follow up of 68 months, the event-free, relapse-free, and overall survival rates were 90.6%, 94.3%, 98.6%, respectively. Conclusions. Teratomas show a good prognosis, especially the mature ones: surgery and follow-up remain the standard approach. Incomplete surgery in immature teratoma is the group at greatest risk of relapse. Bilateral ovarian tumors are a possibility, and the rare family predisposition to ovarian mature teratoma warrants further analyses.

Objective: Infants from multiple pregnancies have higher rates of preterm birth, stillbirth and neonatal death and differences in multiple birth rates (MBR) exist between countries. We aimed to describe differences in MBR in Europe and to investigate the impact of these differences on adverse perinatal outcomes at a population level. Methods: We used national aggregate birth data on multiple pregnancies, maternal age, gestational age (GA), stillbirth and neonatal death collected in the Euro-Peristat project (29 countries in 2010, N = 5 074 643 births). We also used European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) data on assisted conception and single embryo transfer (SET). The impact of MBR on outcomes was studied using meta-analysis techniques with randomeffects models to derive pooled risk ratios (pRR) overall and for four groups of country defined by their MBR. We computed population attributable risks (PAR) for these groups. Results: In 2010, the average MBR was 16.8 per 1000 women giving birth, ranging from 9.1 (Romania) to 26.5 (Cyprus). Compared to singletons, multiples had a nine-fold increased risk (pRR 9.4, 95% Cl 9.1-9.8) of preterm birth (

Lumahyphes cocal sp. nov. (Figs. 1–7) Diagnosis. Male imago: 1) vein CuP of fore wing with basal portion attached to vein A (Fig. 3 a,b); 2) terga base color whitish and terga I–X washed with gray, in whole or part (Figs. 1–2); 3) dorsal structure of penes apically rounded (Fig. 7); 4) spines of penes long, S-shaped in lateral view (Fig. 7); 5) spines of penes with apex directed anteriorly (Fig. 7). Description. Male imago. Antenna: 0.4 mm; body: 2.4–2.9 mm; fore wing: 2.8–2.9 mm; hind wing: 0.4–0.5 mm; tibia I: 0.8 mm; tibia II: 0.6 mm; tibia III: 0.7 mm; cerci broken and missing. Head (Figs. 1, 2). Dark grey dorsally, grey ventrally; compound eyes blackish; ocelli whitish, surrounded with blackish; antenna whitish and washed with gray. Thorax (Figs. 1, 2). Pronotum whitish washed with gray. Meso- and metanotum brown; prelateroscutum and scutellum washed with gray; medioscutum, submedioscutum, sublateroscutum and posterior scutal protuberance darker. Prosternum whitish and washed with light gray. Meso- and metasternum brown; basisternum darker. Legs yellowish light-brown, foreleg darker; coxa and trochanter brown; apex of femur with black mark on dorsal region (Fig. 1); base of tibia brown. Fore wing membrane greyish (Fig. 3); basal portion of vein CuP attached to vein A (Fig. 3 b); costal and subcostal regions gray. Hind wing membrane greyish (Fig. 4). Abdomen (Figs. 1, 2). Basal color whitish. Terga I–III & VIII–X washed with gray completely; terga IV–VII with only median region washed with gray. Sterna I–VI washed with gray; sternum IX washed with light brown. Genitalia (Figs. 5, 6, 7). Median projections of styliger plate short and pointed distally (Fig. 5); accessory dorsal structure of penes rounded (Fig. 7). Forceps whitish; segment I 0.75 × length of segment II; segment I washed with light brown. Penes whitish; spines washed with light brown; spines of penes S-curved in lateral view; apex of spines anteriorly directed (Fig. 7). Bases of cerci whitish. Etymology. The specific epithet of the new species is an allusion to the locality where the holotype was collected: Igarapé Cocal, Amajarí, Roraima. Distribution. BRAZIL: Roraima. Comments. Lumahyphes cocal sp. nov. shares most of the characteristics found in the diagnosis for the genus made by Domínguez et al. (2006). The only generic characterisitic that is not found in this new species is that vein CuP of the fore wing does not retains its basal portion paralleling CuA. In this new species, the basal portion of vein CuP on fore wing is attached to A (Fig. 3), as found in the genera Traverhyphes Molineri, 2001 and Vacupernius Wiersema & McCafferty, 2000. In the key by Dominguez et al. (2006), L. cocal sp. nov. would key as L. guacra or L. yagua. However, adults of these three species can be distinguished easily by the genitalia. Lumahyphes cocal sp. nov. has the accessory dorsal structure of penes and median projections of styliger plate not curved (Fig. 7); the spines of the penes are relatively long, S-curved in lateral view, and with anteriorly directed apices (Fig. 7). Lumahyphes guacra and L. yagua, on the other hand, have the dorsal structure and the inner posterolateral projection of styliger plate curved (as in Dominguez et al. 2006: Figs. 100 F, L), and the spines of the penes have a different shape in lateral view. Material examined. Holotype: Male imago, Brazil, Roraima, Amajari, Serra do Tepequém, Igarapé Cocal, 3 ° 73 'N, 61 ° 72 'W, 18.xii. 2014, Boldrini, R., Barroso, P.C.S., Oliveira, D.R. and Borges, R.L. leg. (INPA). Paratypes: Two male imagos, same data as holotype (INPA); four male imagos, same data as holotype, except, 01.xi. 2014, Boldrini, R., Boldrini, B.M.P.O., Barroso, P.C.S. and Santos, G.C. leg (CZNC); two male imagos (legs, wings and genitalia mounted on slides), same data as holotype, except, 01.xi. 2014, Boldrini, R., Boldrini, B.M.P.O., Barroso, P.C.S. and Santos, G.C. leg (UFRR); two male imagos, Brazil, Roraima, Pacaraima, Igarapé Samã, 4 ° 28 ' 30.8 ''N, 61 °09' 44.4 ''W, 06.i. 2015, Boldrini, R. leg. (UFRR).

© 2015 Authors; published by Portland Press Limited. Genetic disorders of the surfactant system are rare diseases with a broad range of clinical manifestations, from fatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in neonates to chronic interstitial lung disease (ILD) in children and adults. ABCA3 [ATP-binding cassette (ABC), subfamily A, member 3] is a lung-specific phospholipid transporter critical for intracellular surfactant synthesis and storage in lamellar bodies (LBs). Its expression is developmentally regulated, peaking prior to birth under the influence of steroids and transcription factors. Bi-allelicmutations of the ABCA3 gene represent the most frequent cause of congenital surfactant deficiency, indicating its critical role in lung function. Mutations affect surfactant lipid and protein processing and LBs' morphology, leading to partial or total surfactant deficiency. Approximately 200 mutations have been reported, most of which are unique to individuals and families, which makes diagnosis and prognosis challenging. Various types of mutations, affecting different domains of the protein, account in part for phenotype diversity. Disease-causing mutations have been reported in most coding and some non-coding regions of the gene, but tend to cluster in the first extracellular loop and the second nucleotide-binding domain (NBD), leading to defective glycosylation and trafficking defects and interfering with ATP binding and hydrolysis respectively. Mono-allelic damaging and benign variants are often subclinical but may act as diseasemodifiers in lung diseases such as RDS of prematurity or associate withmutations in other surfactantrelated genes. Diagnosis is complex but essential and should combine pathology and ultrastructure studies on lung biopsy with broad-spectrum genetic testing of surfactant-related genes, made possible by recent technology advances in the massive parallel sequencing technology.

Camelobaetidius baumgardneri sp. nov. Boldrini (Figs. 1; 8���17) Diagnose. Nymphs: 1) Labrum subrectangular (Fig. 8); 2) segment II of labial palp with distomedial projection triangular with apex pointed (Fig. 13); 3) thoracic gill absent at the base of coxae; 4) tarsal claws with 49���55 denticles (Fig. 14); 5) posterior margin of terga with rounded spines (Fig. 15). Description. Nymph. Length of body: 4.8���5.5 mm; length of antennae: 1.2���1.4 mm; length of cerci: 2.1 mm; length of terminal filament: 1.8 ���2.0 mm; tibia I: 0.8 mm; tibia II: 0.8 mm; tibia III: 0.6 mm. Head (Fig. 1). Light brown. Antennae light brown. Lateral branch of epicranial suture straight. Labrum (Fig. 8). Subrectangular, broader than long. Length about 0.6 �� maximum width; lateral and anterolateral margin with long, fine, bifid and pectinate setae; medially with fine, bifid and pectinate setae. Dorsally with five short, fine, simple setae scattered over basal area; dorsolateral arc of setae with a row of 1 + 7 long, fine, apically pointed setae. Left mandible (Fig. 9). Incisors with seven denticles. Prostheca robust, apically denticulate. Margin between prostheca and mola with two spine-like setae; subtriangular process narrow; setae at apex of mola absent. Basal half with four short, fine, simple setae. Right mandible (Fig. 10). Incisors with seven denticles. Prostheca slender, apically with longitudinal row of denticles; margin between prostheca and mola with three spine-like setae; setae at apex of mola present. Basal half with four short, fine, simple setae. Hypopharynx (Fig. 11). Lingua shorter than superlingua; apex rounded, with tuft of short, fine, simple setae. Superlingua not expanded, with fine, simple setae scattered over lateral and distal margin. Maxilla (Fig. 12). Inner dorsal row of setae with two pectinate denti-setae, apical denti-seta opposed to canines. Medial protuberance of galea with 1 + 3 long, fine and simple setae. Maxillary palp 1.2 �� length of galealacinia. Fine and simple setae present at apex of segment I of maxillary palp. Labium (Fig. 13). Glossa shorter than paraglossa; inner margin with six spine-like setae increasing in length distally; apex with two long, spine-like setae; outer margin with two long, spine-like setae; ventral and dorsal surface bare. Paraglossa sub-rectangular, curved inward; apex with two rows of long, fine, simple setae; ventral surface bare; dorsal surface with three fine, spine-like setae near to apex. Labial palp segment II with distomedial projection triangular with apex pointed; dorsally with a row of four fine, spine-like setae; segment III rounded, length 0.5 �� width, scattered with spine-like setae. Thorax (Fig. 1). Light brown. Hind wing pad present. Thoracic gill absent at the base of coxae. Femur, tibia and tarsi light brown; apex of femur brown. Tibia I 1.1 �� length of femur I, tibia II 0.9 �� length of femur II, tibia III 0.8 �� length of femur III; tarsi I 0.5 �� length of femur I, tarsi II and III about 0.4 �� length of the respective femur. Forefemur (Fig. 14). Length about 2.7 �� maximum width; dorsally with row of c.a. 50 long, spine-like setae; ventrally with three short spine-like setae. Foretibia. Dorsally with fine, simple setae; ventrally with few fine, simple setae; anterior surface with three short spine-like setae, apex with two spine-like setae; patella-tibial suture present, 0.5 �� length of tibia. Foretarsi. Ventrally with five short, spine-like setae. Tarsal claws with 49���55 denticles. Mid femur. Length about 3.2 �� maximum width; dorsally with row of c.a. 55 long, spine-like setae. Hind femur. Length about 3.2 �� maximum width; dorsally with row of c.a. 40 long, spine-like setae. Abdomen (Fig. 1). Light brown, except for brown anterolateral oblique stripe on segments II to VI and anterior and posterior sigilla. Terga with creased surface, posterior margin of tergum IV with rounded spines (Fig. 15). Gills oval. Gills IV (Fig. 16) light brown; margins with narrow spine intercalating short, fine, simple setae; tracheae pigmented. Gill I 0.6 �� length of segment II; gill IV 2.0�� length of segment V; gill VII 0.8 �� length of segment VIII. Paraproct (Fig. 17). With three spines near inner margin; without shagreened area; postero-lateral extension with marginal spines. Cerci light brown; outer and inner margin of terminal filament and inner margin of the cerci with tufts of long, simple setae; outer margin of the cerci with spines at apex on each segment. Etymology: The name of the species is in honor of Dr. David E. Baumgardner, for his significant contributions to the knowledge of Ephemeroptera. Distribution. BRAZIL: Goi��s. Comments. The nymphs of Camelobaetidius baumgardneri sp. nov. are possibly closely related to C. sallesi sp. nov. Both species present the unique combination of characteristics such as the segment II of labial palp with distomedial projection triangular with apex pointed, thoracic gill absent at base of forecoxa, tarsal claws with similar number of denticles, and terminal filament as long as cerci. Camelobaetidius baumgardneri is easily distinguished from C. sallesi sp. nov. by the shape of labrum, subrectangular (Fig. 8) in C. baumgardneri sp. nov., and narrowly rounded anteriorly (Fig. 38) in C. sallesi sp. nov., and by the shape of the spines on posterior margin of terga IV, rounded in C. baumgardneri sp. nov. (Fig. 15), and pointed (Fig. 45) in C. sallesi sp. nov.. Material examined. Holotype: Nymph, BRAZIL, Goi��s, Posse, Rio do Prata, 14 �� 14 ' 46.4 "N / 46 �� 33 '07.0"W, 09.viii. 2010, Boldrini, R., Hamada, N. and Querino, R. leg (INPA). Paratypes: Two nymphs, same data as holotype (CZNC). Two nymphs (mounted on slides, medium Euparal), same data as holotype (UFRR)., Published as part of Boldrini, R. & Pes, A. M. O., 2014, Five new species of Camelobaetidius Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae), and redescription of Camelobaetidius mexicanus (Traver & Edmunds, 1968), pp. 545-567 in Zootaxa 3796 (3) on pages 546-551, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3796.3.8, http://zenodo.org/record/230100

Camelobaetidius cruzi sp. nov. Boldrini (Figs. 3; 28���37) Diagnose. 1) Labrum narrowly rounded anteriorly (Fig. 28); 2) segment II of labial palp with a short rounded distomedial projection (Fig. 33); 3) thoracic gill absent at the base of coxae; 4) tarsal claws with 13 denticles (Fig. 34 a); 5) posterior margin of terga with rounded spines (Fig. 35). Description. Nymph. Length: 2.8���3.2 mm; length of antennae: broken; length of cerci: 1.3 mm; length of terminal filament: 1.1 mm; tibia I: 0.3 ���04 mm; tibia II: 0.3 mm; tibia III: 0.3 mm. Head (Fig. 3). Light brown. Antennae light brown. Lateral branch of epicranial suture straight. Labrum (Fig. 28). Narrowly rounded anteriorly. Length about 0.8 �� maximum width; anterolateral margin with long, fine, bifid setae, anterior margin with fine, bifid and pectinate setae. Dorsally with two short, fine, simple setae over basal area; dorsolateral arc of setae with two long, fine and apically pointed setae on lateral region. Left mandible (Fig. 29). Incisors with seven denticles. Prostheca robust, apically denticulate. Margin between prostheca and mola with three short, spine-like setae; subtriangular process wide; setae at apex of mola absent. Basal half with three fine, simple setae. Right mandible (Fig. 30). Incisors with seven denticles. Prostheca slender, apically denticulate; margin between prostheca and mola with one short spine-like seta; setae at apex of mola present. Basal half without setae. Hypopharynx (Fig. 31). Lingua shorter than superlingua, apex rounded with tuft of short, fine, simple setae. Superlingua rounded, with fine, simple setae on distal margin. Maxilla (Fig. 32). Inner dorsal row of setae with two pectinate denti-setae, apical denti-seta at the same orientation of canines. Medial protuberance of galea with 1 + 3 long, fine simple setae. Maxillary palp 1.4 �� length of galea-lacinia. Labium (Fig. 33). Glossa shorter than paraglossa; inner margin with seven fine, simple setae; apex with two long, fine setae; outer margin with three long fine setae; ventral surface with three short, fine, simple setae. Paraglossa sub-rectangular; apex with two rows of long, fine setae; ventral surface with four long, fine, simple setae (Fig. 33 a); dorsal surface with three fine, simple setae near apex. Labial palp segment II with distomedial projection short and rounded; dorsally with a row of two long, fine, spine-like setae. Segment III sub-quadrangular, length 0.8 �� width, scattered with spine-like setae. Thorax (Fig. 3). Light brown; mesonotum with posterior region brown. Legs light brown. Hind wing pad present. Thoracic gill absent at the base of coxae. Tibia I 0.7 �� length of femur I, tibia II 0.8 �� length of femur II, and tibia III 0.7 �� length of femur III; tarsi I 0.6 x in length of femur I, tarsi II 0.6 �� length of femur II, and tarsi III 0.5 �� length of femur III. Forefemur (Fig. 34). Length about 3.2 �� maximum width; dorsally with row of c.a. nine spine-like setae increasing in length distally; ventrally with two short, spine-like setae. Foretibia. With one spine-like setae at apex; patella-tibial suture present, 0.5 �� length of tibia. Foretarsi. Ventrally with short, fine, simple setae and one short, spine-like setae near apex. Tarsal claws (Fig. 34 a) with 13 denticles. Mid femur. Length about 2.7 �� maximum width; dorsally with row of c.a. eight long, spine-like setae. Hind femur 2.4 �� maximum width; dorsally with row of c.a. six long, spine-like setae. Abdomen (Fig. 3). Light brown; posterolateral corners of segments II and III and segments V and VI washed with brown, middle region of segments III and VI with a brown mark. Terga not creased, smooth, posterior margin of tergum IV with rounded spines (Fig. 35). Gills IV (Fig. 36) light brown; tracheae pigmented. Paraproct (Fig. 37). With two spines near inner margin; surface smooth, without shagreened area; postero-lateral extension smooth. Cerci light brown; outer and inner margin of terminal filament and inner margin of the cerci with tufts of long, simple setae. Etymology: The name of the species is in honor of Paulo Vilela Cruz, who collected the nymphs of this species. Distribution. BRAZIL: Mato Grosso do Sul. Comments. The general shape of labial palp (Fig. 33), the number of denticles on the tarsal claws (Fig. 34 a) and the body color pattern (Fig. 3) of the new species are similar to those found in C. matilei (Fig. 4). Camelobaetidius cruzi sp. nov., however, is distinguished from C. matilei by the presence of hind wing pad. Material examined. Holotype: Nymph (mounted on slides, medium Euparal), BRAZIL, Mato Grosso do Sul, Bonito, balne��rio municipal de Jardim, Rio Prata, 21 �� 25 '04.3"S / 56 �� 23 '24.0"W, 15.iii. 2012, Cruz, P.V. leg (INPA). Paratype: Two nymphs (mounted on slides, medium Euparal), same data as holotype, (one in CZNC and one in UFRR)., Published as part of Boldrini, R. & Pes, A. M. O., 2014, Five new species of Camelobaetidius Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae), and redescription of Camelobaetidius mexicanus (Traver & Edmunds, 1968), pp. 545-567 in Zootaxa 3796 (3) on pages 554-557, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3796.3.8, http://zenodo.org/record/230100

Camelobaetidius mexicanus (Traver & Edmunds, 1968) (Figs. 7; 58���66) Dactylobaetis mexicanus Traver & Edmunds, 1968: 662; Allen & Chao, 1978: 304. Camelobaetidius mexicanus; McCafferty & Waltz, 1990: 777; McCafferty & Provonsha, 1993: 67; McCafferty et al. 2004: 206; Meyer et al. 2008: 136. Diagnose. Nymph: 1) Labrum narrowly rounded anteriorly (Fig. 58); 2) segment II of labial palp with distomedial projection rounded and large (Fig. 63); 3) thoracic gill absent at the base of coxae; 4) tarsal claws with six denticles, first denticle distinctly longer than others (Fig. 64 a); 5) posterior margin of terga without spines. Description. Nymph. Length of body: 2.3 mm; length of antennae: 1.5 mm; length of cerci: broken; length of terminal filament: broken; tibia I: 0.6 mm; tibia II: 0.6 mm; tibia III: 0.6 mm. Head (Figs. 7). Brown. Antennae brown. Lateral branch of epicranial suture straight. Labrum (Fig. 58). Narrowly rounded anteriorly, broader than long. Length about 0.7 �� maximum width; lateral margin with long, fine and bifid setae; anterolateral and anterior margin with long, fine, bifid and pectinate setae. Dorsally with four fine, simple setae scattered over basal area; dorsolateral arc of setae with 1 + 8 long, fine and apically pointed setae. Left mandible (Fig. 59). Prostheca robust, apically denticulate. Margin between prostheca and mola without spine-like setae; subtriangular process narrow. Basal half without setae. Right mandible (Fig. 60). Prostheca slender, apically with longitudinal row of denticles; margin between prostheca and mola straight, with three spine-like setae; setae at apex of mola present. Basal half with four simple setae. Hypopharynx (Fig. 61). Lingua little shorter than superlingua; apex broadly pointed, with tuft of short, fine, simple setae. Superlingua not expanded, with fine, simple setae scattered over lateral and distal margin; apex truncated obliquely. Maxilla (Fig. 62). Inner dorsal row of setae with two denti-setae, apical denti-seta at the same orientation of canines. Medial protuberance of galea with 1 + 2 long, fine, simple setae. Maxillary palp 1.1 �� length of galealacinia. Labium (Fig. 63). Glossa shorter than paraglossa; inner margin with nine spine-like setae increasing in length distally; apex with two long, spine-like setae; outer margin with five long, spine-like setae; ventral surface with three, fine, simple setae. Paraglossa sub-rectangular, curved inward; apex with two rows of long, fine, setae; ventral surface bare; dorsal surface with five robust, simple setae near apex. Labial palp segment II with distomedial projection rounded and large; dorsally with a row of five fine, spine-like setae; segment III conical, length 0.7 �� width, scattered with spine-like setae. Thorax (Figs. 7). Brown. Hind wing pad present. Thoracic gill absent at the base of coxae. Femur brown. Tibia I 0.9 �� length of femur I; tarsi I 0.6 �� length of femur. Tibia II 0.9 �� length of femur II; tarsi II 0.5 �� length of femur II. Tibia III 0.9 �� length of femur III; tarsi III about 0.5 �� length of femur III. Forefemur (Fig. 64). Length about 2.9 �� maximum width; dorsally with row of c.a. 40 long, spine-like setae; posterior surface with seven short, spine-like setae near inner margin; ventrally with two short, spine-like setae. Foretibia. Ventrally with 18 short, spine-like setae; anterior surface with nine fine, simple setae near dorsal margin; patella-tibial suture present, 0.5 �� length of tibia. Foretarsi. Ventrally with 13 spine-like setae, and one long, fine, simple setae near apex. Tarsal claws (Fig. 64 a) with six denticles, first denticle distinctly longer than others. Mid femur. Length about 2.9 �� maximum width; dorsally with row of 40 long, spine-like setae. Hind femur. Length about 2.8 �� maximum width; dorsally with row of c.a. 30 long, spine-like setae. Abdomen (Figs. 7). Brown. Terga without creased surface, smooth; posterior margin of tergum IV without spines. Gill oval. Gills IV (Fig. 65) light brown; margins with narrow spines intercalating short, fine, simple setae; tracheae unpigmented. Gill IV 1.7 �� length of segment V; gill VII 1.1 �� length of segment VIII. Paraproct (Fig. 66). With two spines near inner margin; surface without shagreened area; postero-lateral extension with pointed and rounded marginal spines. Distribution. MEXICO (Traver & Edmunds, 1968); UNITED STATES (Allen & Chao, 1978); GUATEMALA (McCafferty et al. 2004); NICARAGUA (Meyer et al. 2008). Comments. Camelobaetidius mexicanus is possibly related to C. warreni (Traver & Edmunds, 1968) and C. maidu Jacobus & McCafferty, 2005. These species share the segment II of labial palp with a distomedial projection rounded and large (Fig. 63), similar number of denticles on tarsal claws and the terminal filament as long as cerci. Camelobaetidius mexicanus is distinguished from both species by the absence of thoracic gill at the base of forecoxae. Examined material. Paratype: One nymph (mounted on slides, medium Euparal), MEXICO, Tamaulipas, Rio Guayalejo, 22.xii. 1939; Berner, L. leg. (FAMU). Additional material: Three nymphs (mounted on slides, medium Euparal), GUATEMALA, Dept. Alta Verapaz, Rio Cahob��n, San Julian, 14.vii.2002, 15�� 19 ���09������N / 90 �� 19 ���06���S, Baumgardner, D.E. Leg (UFRR)., Published as part of Boldrini, R. & Pes, A. M. O., 2014, Five new species of Camelobaetidius Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae), and redescription of Camelobaetidius mexicanus (Traver & Edmunds, 1968), pp. 545-567 in Zootaxa 3796 (3) on pages 563-564, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3796.3.8, http://zenodo.org/record/230100, {"references":["Allen, R. K. & Chao, E. S. M. (1978) Mayflies of the Southwest: New Species and Records of Dactylobaetis (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). The Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 54, 300 - 304.","McCafferty, W. P. & Waltz, R. D. (1990) Revisionary Synopsis of the Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) of North and Middle America. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 116 (4), 769 - 799.","McCafferty, W. P. & Provonsha, A. V. (1993) New species, subspecies, and stage descriptions of Texas Baetidae (Ephemeroptera). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 95 (1), 59 - 69.","McCafferty, W. P., Baumgardner, D. E. & Guenter, J. L. (2004) The Ephemeroptera of Central America. Part 1: Guatemala. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 130, 201 - 219.","Meyer, M. D., Baumgardner, D. E. & McCafferty, W. P. (2008) The Ephemeroptera of Central America. Part 2: Nicaragua. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 134, 133 - 146.","Jacobus, L. M. & McCafferty, W. P. (2005) A new species and new synonym in Camelobaetidius Demoulin (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 78, 153 - 157. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.2317 / 0409.20.1"]}

Camelobaetidius tepequensis sp. nov. Boldrini (Figs. 6; 48–57) Diagnose. Nymphs: 1) Labrum subrectangular (Fig. 48); 2) segment II of labial palp with distomedial projection robust and rounded (Fig. 53); 3) thoracic gill absent at the base of coxae; 4) ventral surface of femur with many short, blunt setae (Fig. 54); 5) foretibia rotated at apex (Fig. 54); 6) tarsal claws with 9–11 denticles (Fig. 54 a); 7) abdomen elongate (Fig. 6); 8) posterior margin of terga with rounded spines (Fig. 55). Description. Nymph. Length of body: 8.6–8.9 mm; length of antennae: 0.7 –1.0 mm; length of cerci: 2.4–3.9 mm; length of terminal filament: 2.1–3.4 mm; tibia I: 0.4 mm; tibia II: 0.5 mm; tibia III: 0.5 mm. Head (Fig. 6). Brown. Antennae short, light brown, scape and pedicel subcilindrical. Lateral branch of epicranial suture straight. Labrum (Fig. 48). Subrectangular, broader than long. Length about 0.5 × maximum width; lateral margin with long, fine, simple setae; anterolateral and anterior margin with long, fine, bifid and pectinate setae. Dorsally with six short, fine, simple setae scattered over basal area; dorsolateral arc of setae with a row of nine long, fine, apically pointed setae. Ventrally with three short, spine-like setae anterolateral margin. Left mandible (Fig. 49). Incisors with seven denticles. Prostheca robust, apically denticulate. Margin between prostheca and mola with a row of five spine-like setae; subtriangular process short. Basal half with ten short, fine, simple setae. Right mandible (Fig. 50). Incisors with seven denticles. Prostheca slender, apically denticulate; margin between prostheca and mola with a row of three short, spine-like setae; setae at apex of mola present. Basal half with 14 short, fine, simple setae. Hypopharynx (Fig. 51). Lingua subequal in length to superlingua; apex with anteromedial lobe rounded, with short, fine, simple setae. Superlingua not expanded, with fine, simple setae scattered over lateral and distal margin, apex truncated obliquely, external margin cleft subapically. Maxilla (Fig. 52). Inner dorsal row of setae with two pectinate denti-setae, apical denti-seta opposed to canines. Medial protuberance of galea with 1 + 3 long, fine and simple setae. Maxillary palp subequal in length to galea-lacinia, with fine and simple setae scattered over maxillary palp. Labium (Fig. 53). Glossa longer than paraglossa; inner margin with ten spine-like setae increasing in length distally, last three pectinate (Fig. 53 a); apex with one short, robust spine-like setae; outer margin with four long, spine-like setae. Paraglossa sub-rectangular, curved inward; apex with three rows of long, fine, pectinate setae; dorsal surface with one short, fine, spine-like and four long, fine, pectinate setae near to apex. Labial palp segment II with distomedial projection robust and rounded; dorsally with a row of seven fine, spine-like setae; segment III rounded, length 0.6 × width, scattered with simple setae, and spine-like setae. Thorax (Fig. 6). Light brown; metanotum brown. Hind wing pad present. Thoracic gill absent at the base of coxae. Femur, tibia and tarsi light brown; apex of femur brown. Tibia I 0.8 × length of femur I; tibia II and III 0.9 × length of respective femur; tarsi I, II and III about 0.5 × length of the respective femur. Forefemur (Fig. 54). Length about 2.1 × maximum width; dorsally with row of c.a. 60 long, spine-like setae; ventrally with many short, blunt setae; anterior surface with many, short, blunt setae scattered over surface. Foretibia. Dorsally with fine, simple setae; ventrally with short, spine-like setae; anterior surface with short, blunt setae; apex with eleven short, spine-like setae; patella-tibial suture present, 0.7 × in length of tibia; rotated at apex. Foretarsi. Ventrally with six short, spine-like setae and one long, fine, simple setae near apex. Tarsal claws with 9–11 denticles (Fig. 54 a). Mid femur. Length about 2.5 × maximum width; dorsally with a row of c.a. 65 long, spine-like setae. Hind femur. Length about 2.7 × maximum width; dorsally with row of 55 long, spine-like setae. Abdomen (Fig. 6). Light brown, segments I, IV and VII lighter. Terga with creased surface, posterior margin of tergum IV with rounded spines (Fig. 55). Gills oval. Gills IV (Fig. 56) light brown; margins with narrow spine intercalating short, fine, simple setae; tracheae pigmented. Gill I 0.7 × length of segment II; gill IV 1.3 × length of segment V; gill VII 0.8 × length of segment VIII. Paraproct (Fig. 57). With two spines near inner margin; surface with fine, simple setae, without shagreened area; postero-lateral extension with marginal spines. Cerci brown, basal 1 / 3 light brown; outer and inner margin of terminal filament and inner margin of the cerci with tufts of long, simple setae; outer margin of the cerci with spines at apex on each segment, basal 1 / 4 with short spines. Etymology: The epithet specific of the new species is an allusion to the locality where the material was collected, Serra do Tepequém. Distribution. BRAZIL: Roraima. Comments. Camelobaetidius tepequensis sp. nov. differs from others species of the genus by the presence of many, short, blunt setae on anterior surface of femur (Fig. 54), tibia rotated at apex (Fig. 54), and elongate abdomen (Fig. 6). These characters, until now, are not found in any other species of Camelobaetidius. Material examined. Holotype: Nymph, BRAZIL, Roraima, Amajarí, Serra do Tepequém, Cachoeira da Barata, 03° 47 '07.7"N / 61 ° 45 '02.6"W, 29.iii. 2012, Boldrini, R. and Cruz, P.V. leg (INPA). Paratypes: Three nymphs same data as holotype (two in CZNC and one in FAMU); Two nymphs (mounted in slides, medium Euparal), same data as holotype (UFRR); Three nymphs same data as holotype, except for 16.iii. 2014, Boldrini, R. and Salles, F. leg. (CZNC).

Camelobaetidius sallesi sp. nov. Boldrini (Figs. 5; 38���47) Diagnose. Nymphs: 1) Labrum narrowly rounded anteriorly (Fig. 38); 2) segment II of labial palp with distomedial projection triangular with apex pointed (Fig. 43); 3) thoracic gill absent at the base of coxae; 4) tarsal claws with 48���51 denticles (Fig. 44 a); 5) posterior margin of terga with pointed spines (Fig. 45). Description. Nymph. Length of body: 5.2���6.9 mm; length of antennae: 1.3 mm; length of cerci: 2.0 mm; length of terminal filament: 1.8 mm; tibia I: 0.6 mm; tibia II: 0.75 mm; tibia III: 0.8 mm. Head (Fig. 5). Light brown. Antennae light brown. Lateral branch of epicranial suture straight. Labrum (Fig. 38). Narrowly rounded anteriorly, broader than long. Length about 0.7 �� maximum width; lateral margin with long, fine and bifid setae; anterolateral and anterior margin with long, fine, bifid and pectinate setae. Dorsally with eight short, fine, simple setae scattered over basal area; dorsolateral arc of setae with 1 + 7 long, fine and apically pointed setae. Ventrally with three fine, short, spine-like setae on anterolateral margin. Left mandible (Fig. 39). Prostheca robust, apically denticulate. Margin between prostheca and mola with one spine-like setae; subtriangular process narrow. Basal half with four simple setae. Right mandible (Fig. 40). Prostheca slender, apically with longitudinal row of denticles; margin between prostheca and mola straight, with three spine-like setae; setae at apex of mola present. Basal half with two simple setae. Hypopharynx (Fig. 41). Lingua shorter than superlingua; apex rounded, with tuft of short, fine, simple setae. Superlingua not expanded, with fine, simple setae scattered over lateral and distal margin; apex obliquely truncated. Maxilla (Fig. 42). Inner dorsal row of setae with two pectinate denti-setae, apical denti-seta opposed to canines. Medial protuberance of galea with 1 + 2 long, fine, simple setae. Maxillary palp little shorter than galealacinia. Labium (Fig. 43). Glossa shorter than paraglossa; inner margin with seven spine-like setae increasing in length distally; apex with two long, spine-like setae; outer margin with five long, spine-like setae; ventral surface with five short, fine, simple setae. Paraglossa sub-rectangular, curved inward; apex with two rows of long, fine, simple setae; ventral surface bare; dorsal surface with five robust, simple setae near apex. Labial palp segment II with distomedial projection triangular with apex pointed; dorsally with a row of four fine, spine-like setae; segment III rounded, length 0.5 �� width, scattered with fine, simple setae, and fine, spine-like setae. Thorax (Fig. 5). Light brown. Hind wing pad present. Thoracic gill absent at base of coxae. Femur light brown. Tibia I 0.8 �� length of femur I; tarsi I 0.5 �� length of femur. Tibia II 0.9 �� length of femur II; tarsi II 0.5 �� length of femur II. Tibia III subequal to femur III; tarsi III about 0.6 �� length of femur III. Forefemur (Fig. 44). Length about 2.7 �� maximum width; dorsally with row of c.a. 40 long, spine-like setae; ventrally with two short, spine-like setae. Foretibia. Ventrally with few, short, spine-like setae; anterior surface with seven short, fine spine-like setae near ventral margin, posterior surface with a row of short, fine simple setae near dorsal margin; patella-tibial suture present, 0.6 �� in length of tibia. Foretarsi. Ventrally with five spine-like setae, and one long, fine, simple setae near apex. Tarsal claws (Fig. 44 a) with 48���51 denticles. Mid femur. Length about 2.9 �� maximum width; dorsally with row of c.a. 48 long, spine-like setae. Hind femur. Length about 2.8 �� maximum width; dorsally with row of c.a. 48 long, spine-like setae. Abdomen (Fig. 5). Light brown, except for anterolateral brown oblique stripe on segments III to VI. Terga with creased surface, posterior margin of tergum IV with pointed spines (Fig. 45). Gills oval. Gills IV (Fig. 46) white washed with brown; margins with narrow spines intercalating short, fine, simple setae; tracheae pigmented. Gill I 0.8 �� length of segment II; gill IV 1.6 �� length of segment V; gill VII 0.8 �� length of segment VIII. Paraproct (Fig. 47). With two spines near inner margin; surface without shagreened area; postero-lateral extension with spines. Cerci light brown; outer and inner margin of terminal filament and inner margin of the cerci with tufts of long, simple setae. Etymology: The name of the species is in honor of Dr. Frederico Falc��o Salles, for his significant contributions to the knowledge of Ephemeroptera. Distribution. BRAZIL: Goi��s. Comments. The nymphs of Camelobaetidius sallesi sp. nov. is possibly related to C. spinosus Boldrini & Salles, 2012 b, both species present the unique combination of characteristics such as segment II of labial palp with distomedial projection triangular with apex pointed (Fig. 43), thoracic gill absent at the base of forecoxa, terminal filament as long as cerci, and presence of pointed spines on posterior margin of terga (Fig. 45). The new species is easily distinguished from C. spinosus by the number of denticles on tarsal claws (48���51 denticles in C. sallesi sp. nov., 20���24 denticles in C. spinosus). Material examined. Holotype: Nymph, BRAZIL, Goi��s, Rio Verde, bellow the bridge in the BR 0 60, 14. vii. 2004, 17�� 32 ��� 33.5 ������S / 50 �� 33 ��� 25.7 ������W, Hamada, N. leg (INPA). Paratypes: Three nymphs, BRAZIL, Goi��s, Piren��polis, C��rrego Barriguda, 15 �� 50 ' 46.1 "S / 48 �� 55 ' 17.1 "W, 26.vi. 2003, Hamada, N. leg (CZNC); Two nymphs (mounted on slides, medium Euparal), same data as paratype (UFRR)., Published as part of Boldrini, R. & Pes, A. M. O., 2014, Five new species of Camelobaetidius Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae), and redescription of Camelobaetidius mexicanus (Traver & Edmunds, 1968), pp. 545-567 in Zootaxa 3796 (3) on pages 557-560, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3796.3.8, http://zenodo.org/record/230100, {"references":["Boldrini, R., Pes, A. M. O., Francischetti, C. N. & Salles, F. F. (2012 b) New species and new records of Camelobaetidius Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from Southeastern Brazil. Zootaxa, 3526, 17 - 30."]}

Suveillance strategy is a standerd option in stage 1° testicular GCT and suggested for ovarian GCT too. Worries regarding the relapse risk in ovarian are emerging. We here report on our series of stage 1° GGCT

Corinnella Thomas & Dominique, 2006 Corinna Dominique et al. 2005: 73 (nec Corinna Koch, 1841). Corinnella eximia (Thomas & Dominique, 2006: 9); Salles, 2007: 404; Nieto, 2010: 4. Diagnoses. Nymphs: 1) Incisors of mandible fused (Figs. 7, 8; Figs. 2 r and 2 l from Dominique et al. 2005); 2) mandibles without setae between prostheca and mola; 3) maxillary palp segment II bifid (Fig. 6, Fig. 4 from Dominique et al. 2005); 4) labial palp with fine, long setae scattered on ventral surface (Fig. 9; Fig. 5 from Dominique et al. 2005); 5) oblique row of setae near patella-tibial suture on all legs (Fig. 10 b; Fig. 7 from Dominique et al. 2005); 6) patella-tibial suture less than half the length of tibia; (Fig. 10 a; Fig. 7 from Dominique et al. 2005); 7) hind wing pads present; 8) abdominal gills present on segments I–VII; 9) tarsal claws spatulate; 10) terminal filament as long as cerci.

Corinnella thomasi sp. nov. Boldrini & Salles (Figs. 1���13) Diagnoses. 1) Labrum with shallow distomedial emargination and small process (Fig. 4 a); 2) basal half of mandible with fine, simple setae (Figs. 7, 8); 3) posterior margin of terga with rounded spines (Fig. 11); 4) tarsal claw with seven to nine denticles (Figs. 10 a, 10 c, 10 d); 5) inner and outer denticles of tarsal claw distinctly longer than the others (Figs. 10 a, 10 c, 10 d). Description Nymph. Length: 4.3 mm; length of antennae: broken; length of cerci: 1.8 mm; length of terminal filament: 1.6 mm; tibia I: 0.8 mm; tibia II: 0.9 mm; tibia III: 0.8 mm. Head (Figs 1, 2). Light brown. Antennae light brown, with scape and pedicel subcylindrical. Labrum (Fig. 4 a). Subrectangular, broader than long. Length about 0.6 �� maximum width. Distal margin with shallow medial emargination and small process. Ventrally with short, fine, simple setae scattered over area; anterolateral and distal margin with bifid setae (Figs. 4 a, 4 b). Dorsally with few long, fine, simple setae over basal area; lateral and anterolateral margin with 11 long, fine, simple setae. Hypopharynx (Fig. 5). Lingua little shorter than superlingua, apex rounded and slightly convex, with tuft of short, fine, simple setae. Superlingua with outer margin concave, with fine, simple setae on distal margin. Maxilla (Fig. 6). Crown of galea-lacinia with three denticles; inner dorsal and inner ventral row of setae with three setae at the same orientation of denticles, one simple seta and two pectinate denti-setae. Medial protuberance of galea with 1 + 2 long, fine, simple setae. Maxillary palp II bifid, 1.3 �� length of galea-lacinia. Left mandible (Fig. 7). Incisors fused, curved inward, with nine denticles. Prostheca robust, apically denticulate. Margin between prostheca and mola straight without row of setae; tuft of setae at apex of mola absent. Basal half with fine, simple setae over dorsal area. Mola reduced. Right mandible (Fig. 8). Incisors fused, curved inward, with 11 denticles. Prostheca slender, apically denticulate; margin between prostheca and mola without setae; crown of setae present at base of mola present; tuft of setae at apex of mola absent. Basal half with fine, simple setae over dorsal area. Mola reduced. Labium (Fig. 9). Glossa narrow and subequal in length to paraglossa; inner margin with eight fine, simple setae; apex with three long, fine pectinate setae; outer margin with six long, fine setae; ventral surface with a row of eight short, fine, simple setae. Paraglossa sub-rectangular, curved inward; apex with three rows of long, fine, pectinate setae; ventral surface bare; dorsal surface with two fine, simple setae near apex. Labial palp with ventral surface with many, long, fine simple setae. Segment II with distomedial protuberance robust and rounded; dorsally without a row of setae. Segment III conical, length 0.8 �� width, scattered with fine, simple setae. Thorax (Figs. 1, 2). Brown with marks light brown. Legs light brown. Hind wing pad present. Tibia I, II and III subequal in length of the respective femur; tarsi I, II and III 0.4 �� length of respective femur. Foreleg (Fig. 10 a). Femur. Length about 3.5 �� maximum width; dorsally with row of ca. 40 long, spine-like setae; ventrally with seven short, spine-like setae. Tibia. Dorsally with few, short, fine, simple setae; ventrally with short, spine-like setae; anterior surface with row of short, spine-like setae near to patella-tibial suture (Fig. 10 b); posterior surface with a row of short, spine-like setae near inner margin and 15 robust, spine-like setae at apex, increasing in length toward apex; patellatibial suture present, 0.3 �� in length of tibia. Tarsi. Dorsally with short, fine, simple setae; ventrally with 14 short, spine-like setae, and one long fine spine-like setae near apex; posterior surface with short, fine simple setae. Tarsal claws (Fig. 10 c, 10 d) with seven to nine denticles, inner and outer denticles distinctly longer than the others. Abdomen (Figs. 2, 3). Light brown; segments II ��� VI and segments IX ��� X washed with brown. Terga IV (Fig. 11). Surface with fine, simple setae over area; posterior margin with rounded spines. Gills IV (Fig. 12 a). Light brown; margins with narrow spine intercalating short, fine, simple setae (Fig. 12 b); tracheae not pigmented. Paraproct (Fig. 13). With three spines near inner margin; surface bare, without shagreened area; postero-lateral extension smooth. Cerci light brown; outer and inner margin of the terminal filament and inner margin of the cerci with tufts of long, simple setae; outer margin of the cerci with short, fine spine-like setae in each segment. Etymology: The name of the species is in honor of Dr. Alain Thomas, for his significant contributions to the knowledge of Ephemeroptera. Distribution. BRAZIL: Rond��nia. Material examined. Holotype: Female nymph (antennae broken), BRAZIL, Rond��nia, Ribeir��o, Rio Madeira, 10 �� 13 ' 54.5 "S / 65 �� 17 '08"W, 6.vi. 2004, Hamada, N. leg (INPA). Paratype: One male imature nymph mounted on slides, BRAZIL, Rond��nia, Iata, Rio Madeira, 10 �� 35 ' 46.58 ''S / 65 �� 23 '00.96''W, 22.viii. 2012, Boldrini, R., Fernandes, A.S. leg (PPGBT). Comments. Corinnella thomasi sp. nov. is easily distinguished from C. eximia by the shape of the labrum, with the distomedial emargination clearly discernible in C. eximia versus shallow in C. thomasi sp. nov.; by the shape of tarsal claws, with only the first denticle distinctly longer in C. eximia versus the first and last denticles distinctly longer in C. thomasi sp. nov.; by the shape of spines on the posterior margins of terga, being pointed in C. eximia and rounded in C. thomasi sp. nov. The rounded spines found on the posterior margins of terga can be visualized using a microscope with phase contrast.When Dominique et al. (2005) described the genus Corinnella (as Corinna), they stated that the tarsal claws were unique among Baetidae. Later, Nieto (2010), while performing a phylogenetic analysis of South American Baetidae, considered that the tarsal claws of Corinnella were spatulate, such as in the genus Camelobaetidius. Based on the new species, we agree with Nieto (2010) regarding the type of tarsal claws. Despite this similarity, Corinnella presents a series of characteristics that distinguishes it from the genus Camelobaetidius, such as: absence of the dorsal arc of setae on the labrum; presence of many long, fine, simple setae on outer margin of labial palp; and presence of a row of few spine-like setae along patella-tibial suture., Published as part of Boldrini, R., Salles, F. F. & Pes, A. M. O., 2013, A new species of Corinnella Thomas & Dominique, 2006 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae), pp. 75-80 in Zootaxa 3608 (1) on pages 76-80, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3608.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/283273

Camelobaetidius leentvaari Demoulin, 1966 (Figs. 14���15) Camelobaetidius leentvaari Demoulin 1966: 9; Traver & Edmunds 1968: 674; McCafferty & Waltz 1990: 783; Lugo-Ortiz &McCafferty 1995: 178; Dominique et al. 2001 a: 40; Dominique et al. 2002 a: 18; Thomas et al. 2003: 124; Salles et al. 2005 a: 52; Salles et al. 2005 b: 70; Salles & Serr��o 2005: 276; Dom��nguez et al. 2006: 131; Boldrini & Salles 2009: 6; Boldrini et al. 2010: 65; Nieto 2010: 12; Nieto et al. 2011: 4; Boldrini et al. 2012 b: 2057. Camelobaetidius mantis Traver & Edmunds 1968: 675. nov. syn. Diagnoses. Nymph: 1) segment II of labial palp with distomedial projection strongly produced; (2) forefemur with prominent protuberance on inner margin; (3) foretibia with indentation at apex; (4) small thoracic gill present at the base of the forecoxa; (5) prosternum with a single, medial protuberance; (6) tarsal claws with 17���28 denticles; (7) paraproct with 5���17 small marginal spines. Distribution. Surinam (Demoulin, 1966); Venezuela (Nieto et al. 2011). Brazil: Amap�� (Salles et al. 2005 b), Amazonas (Traver & Edmunds, 1968). Comments. Demoulin (1966) described the nymphs of C. leentvaari, the type species of the genus. He overlooked some characters, including the number of denticles on the tarsal claws. Two years later, Traver and Edmunds (1968) described C. mantis, a species very similar to C. leentvaari. Nymphs of both species have segment II of the labial palp with a strongly produced distomedial projection, the forefemur with a prominent protuberance on its inner margin, the foretibia with an apical indentation, and the terminal filament reduced. Traver and Edmunds (1968) distinguished C. mantis from C. leentvaari by the number of denticles on tarsal claws (25 denticles in C. mantis and nine denticles in C. leentvaari, which were visualised and counted in the drawing made by Demoulin, 1966); by the shape of the protuberance on the inner margin of the forefemur (more acute in C. mantis); and by the trachea and lateral branches of the gills being pigmented in C. mantis and unpigmented in C. leentvaari. Later, Salles et al. (2005 b) redescribed C. leentvaari based in the type material and additional material from Brazil. They examined the number of denticles on the tarsal claws and noted that the actual number ranged from 17���23; they also described the presence of a single medial protuberance on the prosternum for this species. After examination of the C. mantis holotype, we noted that this species also has a single medial protuberance on the prosternum. Very slight differences in the shape of the prominent protuberance on the inner margin of the forefemur and the pigmentation of abdominal gill tracheae, as well as differences in the number of denticles on the tarsal claws (25 on C. mantis, 17���28 on C. leentvaari) are easily attributable to natural variation. Greater variation has been documented within other species, such as the Nearctic C. musseri (Traver & Edmunds, 1968) (McCafferty & Randolph, 2000); thus, we consider C. mantis to be a junior synonym of C. leentvaari. We also observed that some specimens of C. leentvaari from Amap��, Brazil, have an important variation in the length of the thoracic gill at the base of foreleg. While the thoracic gill at the base of the foreleg may be relatively short in general (Fig. 14), one nymph in particular has an extremely short thoracic gill (Fig. 15) that might be missed upon superficial examination. Thus, we emphasize the importance of careful examination of specimens for proper identification. Material examined. Two female mature nymphs, one male imature nymph and one female imature nymph, Brazi, Amap��, Oiapoque, Oiapoque river, Cachoeira Grande, 03�� 48 '13.0" N / 51 �� 52 ' 31.2 '' W, 9.viii. 2011, Pes, A.M.O., Cruz, P.V. Fernandes, A.S., Hamada, N. leg (INPA); holotype of Camelobaetidius mantis (PERC), one imature nymph, Brazil, Amazonas State, Rio Amazonas, 16.iii. 1961, Fittkau, E.J. leg. Acknowledgements We express our gratitude to CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient��fico e Tecnol��gico) for a fellowship to FFS and CAPES (Coordena����o de Aperfei��oamento de Pessoal de N��vel Superior) for financial support of the Pro-Equipamentos CAPES. The authors would like to thank Dr. Neusa Hamada (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amaz��nia) for logistic support. Jen Zaspel and Arwin Provonsha (Purdue University) provided access to the holotype of C. mantis., Published as part of Boldrini, R., Jacobus, Luke M., Salles, F. F. & Pes, A. M. O., 2013, The adults of Camelobaetidius janae Dominique & Thomas, 2001 and C. yacutinga Nieto, 2003, with a new synonym for C. leentvaari Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae), pp. 150-158 in Zootaxa 3702 (2) on pages 155-157, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3702.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/217760

Camelobaetidius anubis (Traver & Edmunds, 1968) (Figs. 1–8) Dactylobaetis anubis Traver & Edmunds, 1968: 666. Camelobaetidius anubis McCafferty & Waltz, 1990: 783; McCafferty & Klubertanz, 1994: 41; Lugo-Ortiz & McCafferty, 1995: 187; Dominique & Thomas, 2002: 32; Nieto, 2003: 234; Thomas et al., 2003b: 130; Salles et al., 2003: 5; Salles & Dias, 2004: 269; Salles et al., 2004a: 727; Francischetti et al., 2004: 35; Salles et al., 2004c: 15; Salles & Serrão, 2005: 268; Domínguez et al., 2006: 127; Boldrini & Salles, 2009: 10; Salles et al., 2010: 302; Falcão et al., (2011): 252. Diagnoses. Nymph: 1) Segment II of labial palp with distomedial projection triangular with apex pointed; 2) abdominal terga orange brown with reddish brown marks on segments III and VI (Fig. 7); 3) thoracic gill present at base of forecoxa; 4) tarsal claws with 20–27 denticles; 5) paraproct with 3 pointed marginal spines; 6) terminal filament as long as cerci. Male adult: 1) Turbinate portion of compound eyes orange (Figs. 1, 2); 2) anteronotal protuberance pointed (Fig. 1); 3) abdominal terga orange brown with medial reddish brown marks on segments III and VI (Fig. 2); 4) posterior margin of sugenital plate convex, posteriorly projected; 5) forceps segment I without distomedial projection; 6) forceps segment I 0.3× length of segment II; forceps segment III 0.2× length of segment II (Fig. 3). Female adult: 1) anteronotal protuberance pointed (as in Fig. 1); 2) abdominal terga orange brown with medial reddish brown marks on segments III and VI (Fig. 4). Comments. This species was described based on nymphs from Brazil, states of Paraná and Santa Catarina (Traver & Edmunds, 1968). Nieto (2003) recorded this species from Argentina and described the male imago. Later, Salles et al. (2003, 2004a), Francischetti et al. (2004) and Boldrini & Salles (2009) recorded this species from Southeastern Brazil. Falcão et al. (2011) have also recorded this species from Northern Brazil, although some important variations were found in the nymphs (i.e. 35 denticles on tarsal claw). Herein, we improve the description of the male adult of C. anubis proposed by Nieto (2003), by adding new characters, and describe the female imago of this species. Male adult. Length of tibia I: 1.6 mm; tibia II: 1.2 mm, and tibia III: 1.0 mm. Head (Figs. 1, 2). Dorsal portion of turbinate eyes oval; length 1.6× width; stalk height 0.5× width of dorsal portion; inner margins parallel, not reaching each other. Thorax (Figs. 1, 2). Metanotum with anteronotal protuberance pointed; metascutellar protuberance rounded and of the same level of the metanotum; pleura yellowish. Tarsi segment II of the middle and hind legs with one short apical spine (as in Fig. 7). Leg I: tibia 2.1× length of femur; tarsi 1.2× length of femur. Leg II: tibia 1.7× length of femur; tarsi 0.3× length of femur. Leg III: tibia 1.5× length of femur; tarsi broken. Abdomen (Figs. 1, 2). Terga orange brown with medial reddish brown marks on segments III and VI. Genitalia (Fig. 3). Forceps segment I without distomedial projection, 0.3× length of segment II; distance between inner base of forceps 0.6× distance between lateral margins of forceps. Forceps segment II narrow submedially. Forceps segment III elongate, 2.9× as long as wide; 0.2× length of segment II. Posterior margin of subgenital plate convex, posteriorly projected. FIGUES 1–7. Camelobaetidius anubis, adults. 1 – 3, male. 4 – 7, female. 1, body (l. v.). 2, body (d. v.). 3, genitalia. 4, body (d. v.). 5, forewing. 6a, hind wing. 6b, hind wing (enlarged). 7, detail of tarsal claw. FIGUES 8–12. Camelobaetidius, nymphs (d. v.). 8, C. anubis. 9, C. cayumba. 10, C. janae. 11, C. juparana sp. nov. 12, C. spinosus sp. nov. Female adult. Length of body: 5.2–5.8 mm; cerci: broken; forewing: 5.3–5.5 mm; hind wing: 0.9 mm; tibia I: 1.1 mm; tibia II: 1.2 mm; tibia III: 0.7 mm. Head (Fig. 4). Yellowish brown, with whitish marks on vertex and base of compound eyes; ocelli whitish with base darker; antenna yellowish brown. Thorax (Fig. 4). Pro, meso and metanotum yellowish brown. Pronotum with lateral margin dark brown; mesonotum with medioparapsidal suture dark brown, anteronotal protuberance pointed (as in Fig. 1); metanotum with posterior margin dark brown, metascutellar protuberance rounded and at the same level of metanotum; pleura yellowish. Legs. Tarsi segment II of legs with one short apical spine (Fig. 7). Femur yellowish brown; tibia and tarsi brown. Leg I: tibia 1.3× length of femur; tarsi 0.5× length of femur; segments IV>I>II>III. Leg II: tibia 1.4× length of femur; tarsi 0.3× length of femur. Leg III: tibia 1.1× length of femur; tarsi 0.2× length of femur. Forewing membrane hyaline (Fig. 5); veins light brown; stigmatic area with six cross veins; marginal intercalary veins paired, except between vein s ICu2 and A; length of forewing about 2.5× width. Hind wing membrane and veins hyaline (Figs. 6a, 6b); with two complete longitudinal veins, without cross veins; costal process pointed, located on basal third. Abdomen (Fig. 4). Terga orange brown with medial reddish brown marks on segments III and VI, and brown marks present on lateral margin of the segments II, III and V. Sterna yellowish white. Distribution: ARGENTINA; BRAZIL: states of Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Paraná, Rio de Janeiro, Roraima, Santa Catarina and São Paulo.. Material examined. Two male imagos (reared), BRAZIL, Espírito Santo, Alfredo Chaves, Nova Mantova, 20º39’22.6’’S / 40º50’12.9’’W, 5.xii.2010, Boldrini, R. (CZNC). Same as preceeding except one female imago (reared), Boldrini, R. (INPA). Same as preceeding except one female imago,12.xiii.2007, Boldrini, R. (CNZC)., Published as part of Boldrini, R., Pes, A. M. O., Francischetti, C. N. & Salles, F. F., 2012, New species and new records of Camelobaetidius Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from Southeastern Brazil, pp. 17-30 in Zootaxa 3526 on pages 18-21, {"references":["Traver, J. R. & Edmunds, G. F. Jr. (1968) A revision of the Baetidae with spatulate-clawed nymphs (Ephemeroptera). Pacific Insects, 10, 629 - 677.","McCafferty, W. P. & Waltz, R. D. (1990) Revisionary synopsis of the Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) of North and Middle America. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 116, 769 - 799.","McCafferty, W. P. & Klubertanz, T. H. (1994) Camelobaetidius (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) in Indiana and Iowa: New Species and Range Extension. Proceedings of Entmological Society Washington, 96 (1), 37 - 43.","Lugo-Ortiz, C. R. & McCafferty, W. (1995) Taxonomy of North and Central American Species of Camelobaetidius (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Entomological News, 106, 178 - 192.","Nieto, C. (2003) El genero Camelobaetidius (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) en la Argentina. Acta Zoologica Mexicana (Nueva Serie), 88, 233 - 255.","Thomas, A., Peru, N. & Horeau, V. (2003 b) Les Ephemeres de la Guyane Francaise. 8. Description de Camelobaetidius matilei n. sp. et cle de determination de especes guyanensis de ce genre [Ephemeroptera: Baetidae]. Ephemera, 3 (2) 123 - 133.","Salles, F. F, Francischetti, C. N., Roque, F. O., Pepinelli, M. & Strixino, S. T. (2003) Levantamento preliminar dos Generos e Especies de Baetidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) do Estado de Sao Paulo, com Enfase em Coletas Realizadas em Corregos Florestados de Baixa Ordem. Biota Neotropica, 3 (2), 1 - 7.","Salles, F. F. & Dias, L. G. (2004) Descricao dos adultos de Camelobaetidius billi (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae). Iheringia, 94, 209 - 210.","Salles, F. F., Da-Silva, E. R., Serrao, J. E. & Francischetti, C. N. (2004 a) Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) na Regiao Sudeste do Brasil: Novos Registros e Chave Para os Generos no Estagio Ninfal. Neotropical Entomology, 33 (6), 725 - 735.","Francischetti, C. N., Da-Silva, E. R., Salles, F. F. & Nessimian, J. L. (2004) A Ephemeropterofauna (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) do trecho ritral inferior do Rio Campo Belo, Itatiaia, RJ: composicao e mesodistribuicao. Ludiana, 5 (1), 33 - 39.","Salles, F. F., Da-Silva, E. R., Hubbard, M. D. & Serrao, J. E. (2004 c) As especies de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) registradas para o Brasil. Biota Neotropica, 4 (2), 1 - 34.","Salles, F. F. & Serrao, J. E. (2005) The nymphs of the genus Camelobaetidius Demoulin (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) in Brazil: new species, new records, and key for the identification of the species. Annales de Limnologie, 41, 267 - 279.","Dominguez, E., Molineri, C., Pescador, M. L., Hubbard, M. D. & Nieto, C. (2006) Ephemeroptera of South America. In Aquatic Biodiversity of Latin America (J. Adis, J. R. Arias, G. Rueda-Delgado & K. M. Wantzen, eds.). Vol. 2, Pensoft, Moscowsofia, p. 1 - 646.","Boldrini, R. & Salles, F. F. (2009) A new species of two-tailed Camelobaetidius (Insecta: Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from Espirito Santo, southeastern Brazil. Revista do Museu de Biologia Mello Leitao, 25, 5 - 12.","Salles, F. F., Nascimento, J. M. C., Massariol, F. C., Angeli, K. B., Barcelos e Silva, P., Rudio, J. A. & Boldrini R. (2010) Primeiro levantamento da fauna de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) do Espirito Santo, Sudeste do Brasil. Biota Neotropica, (10), 294 - 307.","Falcao, J. N., Salles, F. F. & Hamada, N. (2011) Baetidae (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) ocorrentes em Roraima, Brasil: novos registros e chaves para generos e especies no estagio ninfal. Revista Brasileira de Entomol ogia, 55 (4), 516 - 548."]}

Camelobaetidius juparana sp. nov. Boldrini & Salles (Figs. 11; 13–22) Diagnoses. Nymphs: 1) Segment II of labial palp with distomedial projection robust and rounded (Fig. 18); 2) bifid thoracic gill present at the base of forecoxa (Fig. 19a); 3) tarsal claws with 23–29 denticles (Fig. 19b); 4) paraproct without spines (Fig. 22); 5) terminal filament as long as cerci. Comments. Camelobaetidius juparana sp. nov. is possibly closely related to C. hamadae Salles & Serrão, 2005 another species in which the nymphs present a bifid thoracic gill at the base of the forecoxa and a paraproct without spines. It is easily distinguished from C. hamadae by the number of setae on the dorsal margin of labrum, 10 versus 32 in C. hamadae; by the shape of the hypopharynx, superlingua with distal margin oblique versus truncated in C. hamadae, and lingua subequal in length to superlingua versus superlingua shorter than lingua in C. hamadae; by the number of denticles on tarsal claws, 23–29 denticles versus 36–37 denticles in C. hamadae; and by the shape of the spines on posterior margin of terga IV: it is truncate in C. juparana sp. nov., and in C. hamadae this spines are triangular. Description Nymph. Length of body: 2.9–3.5 mm; length of antennae: 1.3 mm; length of cerci: 1.7 mm; length of terminal filament: 1.4 mm; tibia I: 0.5 mm; tibia II: 0.5 mm; tibia III: 0.4 mm. Head (Fig. 11). Light brown. Antennae light brown, with scape and pedicel subcilindrical. Lateral branch of epicranial suture straight. Labrum (Fig. 13). Subrectangular, broader than long. Length about 0.6× maximum width; lateral margin with long, fine and simple setae; anterolateral margin with long, fine and pectinate setae; medially with short, robust, pectinate setae. Dorsally with seven shorts, fine, simple setae scattered over basal area; dorsolateral arc of setae with a row 10 long, fine and apically pointed setae. Left mandible (Fig. 14). Prostheca robust, apically denticulate. Margin between prostheca and mola straight with a row of spine-like setae; subtriangular process narrow and produced; tuft of setae at apex of mola absent. Basal half bare. Right mandible (Fig. 15). Prostheca slender, apically denticulate; margin between prostheca and mola straight, with two spine-like setae; tuft of spine-like setae at base of mola present; tuft of setae at apex of mola present. Basal half bare. Hypopharynx (Fig. 16). Lingua subequal in length to superlingua; apex rounded, with tuft of short, fine, simple setae. Superlingua not expanded with fine, apex truncated obliquely, simple setae scattered over lateral and distal margin. Maxilla (Fig. 17). Crown of galea-lacinia with four denticles; inner dorsal row of setae with two denti-setae. Medial protuberance of galea with 1 + 2 long, fine, simple setae. Maxillary palp 1.3× length of galea-lacinia. Labium (Fig. 18a). Glossa narrow and subequal in length to paraglossa; inner margin with six spine-like setae increasing in length distally; apex with one long, spine-like setae; outer margin with three long, spine-like setae; ventral surface with one short, fine, simple setae on anteromedian area. Paraglossa sub-rectangular, curved inward; apex with two rows of long, fine, pectinate setae (Fig. 18b); ventral surface bare; dorsal surface with three robust, simple setae near apex. Labial palp with segment I subequal in length of segments II and III combined; outer margin of segment I with short, simple setae near apex; segment II with distomedial protuberance robust and rounded, with simple setae over lateral and ventral area; dorsally with a row of three fine, spine-like setae; segment III rounded, length 0.7× width, scattered with fine, simple setae, and fine, spine-like setae. Thorax (Fig. 11). Light brown with marks brown; metanotum light brown washed with brown. Hind wing pad present. Bifid thoracic gill (Fig. 19a) present at the base of forecoxa. Femur light brown with a medial brown mark, and with dorsal surface and apex brown; tibia light brown with base and apex brown, tarsi light brown washed with brown. Tibia I, II and III subequal in length of the respective femur; tarsi I about 0.7× in length of femur; tarsi II and III about 0.5× in length of the respective femur. Forefemur (Fig. 19a). Length about 2.2× maximum width; dorsally with row of c.a. 40 long, spine-like setae; length of setae 0.3× width of femur; ventrally with short, spine-like setae. Foretibia (Fig. 19a). Dorsally with row of short, fine, simple setae; ventrally with few, short, spine-like setae; anterior surface with a row of long, fine, simple setae; tibio - patelar suture present, 0.6× in length of tibia. Foretarsi (Fig. 19b). Dorsally and ventrally with short, fine, simple setae; ventrally with five spine-like setae, increasing in length toward apex, and one long, fine, simple setae near apex. Tarsal claws (Fig. 19b) with 23–29 denticles. Abdomen (Fig. 11). Light brown; segments I, III and VI washed with brown, and anterior margin of the segment VII washed with brown; segments III and VI with distinct median and lateral brown marks. Terga IV with surface creased (Fig. 20); posterior margin with truncate spines. Gills IV (Fig. 21a). Light brown; margins with narrow spine intercalating short, fine, simple setae; tracheae pigmented (Fig. 21b), extended from main trunk. Gills oval. Gill I 0.5× length of segment II; gill IV 2.1× length of segment V; gill VII 0.9× length of segment VIII. Paraproct (Fig. 22). Without spines near on inner margin; surface with fine, simple setae, without shagreened area; postero-lateral extension with rounded marginal spines. Cerci light brown; outer and inner margin of the terminal filament and inner margin of the cerci with tufts of long, simple setae. Etymology: The specific epithet juparana is a reference to Lagoa Juparanã, one of Brazilian largest lakes. The São José River, where the species has been found, is the main tributary of Lagoa Juparanã. Distribution. BRAZIL: Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais. Material examined. Holotype: One nymph, BRAZIL, Espírito Santo, Sooretama, Rio São José, 19°07'33.1"S / 40°14'261"W, 4.x.2010, 24 m, Boldrini, R., Salles, F.F. & Nascimento, J.M.C. leg (CZNC). Paratypes: One nymph mounted in slides, same data holotype (CNZC). One nymph, same data holotype (CNZC). One nymph, same data holotype (INPA). Three nymphs mounted in slides, same data holotype, except 9.ix.2010 (INPA). One nymph mounted on slides, Minas Gerais, Pingo D´Agua, Rio Sacramento, 19º49’S / 42º18’W, 29.x.2005, Francischetti, C.N. & Salles, F.F. leg (CZNC)., Published as part of Boldrini, R., Pes, A. M. O., Francischetti, C. N. & Salles, F. F., 2012, New species and new records of Camelobaetidius Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from Southeastern Brazil, pp. 17-30 in Zootaxa 3526 on pages 23-24, {"references":["Salles, F. F. & Serrao, J. E. (2005) The nymphs of the genus Camelobaetidius Demoulin (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) in Brazil: new species, new records, and key for the identification of the species. Annales de Limnologie, 41, 267 - 279."]}

Camelobaetidius cayumba (Traver & Edmunds, 1968) (Fig. 9) Dactylobaetis cayumba Traver & Edmunds, 1968: 669. Camelobaetidius cayumba McCafferty & Davis, 1992: 207; Dominique et al., 2002a: 18; Dominique et al., 2002b: 39; Dom��nguez et al., 2002: 462; Thomas et al., 2003a: 118; Thomas et al., 2003b: 130; Salles & Serr��o, 2005: 269; Dom��nguez et al., 2006: 128; Dias et al., 2009: 238; Falc��o et al., 2011: 527; Boldrini et al., 2012: 93; Lima et al. 2012: 63. Diagnoses. Nymphs: 1) Segment II of labial palp with distomedial process triangular with apex pointed; 2) thoracic gill absent at the base of forecoxa; 3) tarsal claws with 15���18 denticles; 4) paraproct with 3 pointed marginal spines; 5) terminal filament as long as cerci. Male adult: 1) anteronotal and metascutellar protuberance rounded; 2) terga of abdominal segments II ��� III and VI medially with remarkable dark marks; 3) forceps segment I without distomedial projection; 4) posterior margin of subgenital plate convex, posteriorly projected. Female: 1) anteronotal and metascutellar protuberance rounded; 2) abdominal terga with segments I ��� II and V medially with dark spots. Comments. This species was described based on nymphs from Peru (Traver & Edmunds, 1968). Thomas et al. (2003a) subsequently redescribed this species based on nymphs from French Guiana. Dom��nguez et al. (2002) recorded this species from Colombia. Salles & Serr��o (2005) recorded it for the first time from Brazil (states of Goi��s and Rond��nia); Falc��o et al. (2011) recorded this species from the State of Roraima; Boldrini et al. (2012) recorded this species from States of Piau��, Maranh��o and Cear��; and Lima et al. (2012) described the adults from state of Pernambuco (Brazil). Distribution. COLOMBIA; FRENCH GUIANA; PERU; BRAZIL: states of Cear��, Goi��s, Maranh��o, Pernambuco, Piau��, Rond��nia and Roraima. NEW RECORD: Esp��rito Santo. Material examined. Two nymphs mounted on slides, BRAZIL, Esp��rito Santo, Sooretama, Rio S��o Jos��, 19��07'33.1"S / 40��14'26.1"W, 4.x.2010, 24 m, Boldrini, R., Salles, F.F. & Nascimento, J.M.C. leg (CZNC). FIGUES 13���18. Camelobaetidius juparana sp. nov., nymph. 13, labrum (left v.v., right d.v.). 14, left mandible. 15, right mandible. 16, hypopharynx. 17, maxilla. 18a, labium (left v.v., right d.v.). 18b, detail of setae of paraglossa., Published as part of Boldrini, R., Pes, A. M. O., Francischetti, C. N. & Salles, F. F., 2012, New species and new records of Camelobaetidius Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from Southeastern Brazil, pp. 17-30 in Zootaxa 3526 on pages 21-22, {"references":["Traver, J. R. & Edmunds, G. F. Jr. (1968) A revision of the Baetidae with spatulate-clawed nymphs (Ephemeroptera). Pacific Insects, 10, 629 - 677.","McCafferty, W. P. & Davis, J. R. (1992) New and Additional Records of Small Minnow Mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) From Texas. Entomological News, 103 (5), 199 - 209.","Dominique, Y., Mathuriau, C. & Thomas, A. (2002 a) Etude systematique du genre Camelobaetidius Demoulin, 1966 en Colombie [Ephemeroptera, Baetidae]. Bulletin de la Socete d'Histoire Naterelle de Toulouse, 137, 17 - 32.","Dominique, Y., Thomas, A. & Fenoglio, S. (2002 b) Redescription de Camelobaetidius musseri (Traver & Edmunds, 1968) (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Ephemera (2001), 3 (1), 33 - 41.","Dominguez, E., Zuniga, M. delC. & Molineri, C. (2002) Estado actual del conocimiento y distribucion del Orden Ephemeroptera (Insecta) en la region amazonica. Caldasia, 24 (2), 459 - 469.","Thomas, A., Dominique, Y. & Horeau, V. (2003 a) Les Ephemeres de la Guyane Francaise. 7. Redescription de Camelobaetidius cayumba (Traver & Edmunds, 1968) (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Ephemera, 3 (2), 117 - 122.","Thomas, A., Peru, N. & Horeau, V. (2003 b) Les Ephemeres de la Guyane Francaise. 8. Description de Camelobaetidius matilei n. sp. et cle de determination de especes guyanensis de ce genre [Ephemeroptera: Baetidae]. Ephemera, 3 (2) 123 - 133.","Salles, F. F. & Serrao, J. E. (2005) The nymphs of the genus Camelobaetidius Demoulin (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) in Brazil: new species, new records, and key for the identification of the species. Annales de Limnologie, 41, 267 - 279.","Dominguez, E., Molineri, C., Pescador, M. L., Hubbard, M. D. & Nieto, C. (2006) Ephemeroptera of South America. In Aquatic Biodiversity of Latin America (J. Adis, J. R. Arias, G. Rueda-Delgado & K. M. Wantzen, eds.). Vol. 2, Pensoft, Moscowsofia, p. 1 - 646.","Dias, L. G., Bacca, T. & Zuniga, M. delC. (2009) Estado actual del conocimiento del orden Ephemeroptera en Colombia. En: Memorias XXXVI Congreso Sociedad Colombiana de Entomologia. 236 - 253.","Falcao, J. N., Salles, F. F. & Hamada, N. (2011) Baetidae (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) ocorrentes em Roraima, Brasil: novos registros e chaves para generos e especies no estagio ninfal. Revista Brasileira de Entomol ogia, 55 (4), 516 - 548.","Boldrini, R., Cruz, P. V., Salles, F. F., Belmont, E. L. & Hamada, N. (2012) Baetidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) from northeastern Brazil. Check list 8 (1), 88 - 94.","Lima, R. C. L., Boldrini, R., Pinheiro, U. (2012) Imagos of Camelobaetidius cayumba (Traver & Edmunds, 1968) (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Zootaxa, 3401, 63 - 65."]}

Camelobaetidius janae Dominique & Thomas, 2001 (Fig. 10) Camelobaetidius janae Dominique et al., 2001a: 44; Dominique et al., 2001b: 97; Dominique & Thomas 2002: 27; Dominique et al., 2002b: 39; Thomas et al., 2003b: 130; Salles et al., 2004b: 5; Salles et al., 2004c: 15; Salles & Serr��o, 2005: 275; Dom��nguez et al., 2006: 131; Falc��o et al., 2011: 528; Nieto et al., 2011: 8; Boldrini et al., 2012: 93. Diagnoses. Nymphs: 1) Segment II of labial palp with distomedial projection rounded and strongly projected; 2) maxillary palp segment II bifid; 3) thoracic gill absent at base of forecoxa; 4) tarsal claws with 8 ��� 21 denticles; 5) paraproct with 4 pointed marginal spines; 6) terminal filament as long as cerci. Comments. This species was described based on nymphs from French Guyana (Dominique et al., 2001a). Salles et al. (2004b) recorded it for the first time from Brazil from the state of Mato Grosso. Later, this species was recorded from the states of Rond��nia (Salles et al., 2005), Roraima (Falc��o et al. 2011) and Piau�� (Boldrini et al., 2012). Nieto et al. (2011) recorded this species for the first time from Venezuela. As in Falc��o et al. (2011), we found differences in relation to the number of denticles on the tarsal claws as originally described by Dominique et al. (2001), with 21 denticles on tarsal claws. Falc��o et al. (2011) found one nymph with 8 ��� 9 denticles, and we have also found the same variation in two nymphs in the material from states of Minas Gerais and Esp��rito Santo. As in Falc��o et al. (2011), we are considering this as an intra-specific variation. Distribution. FRENCH GUIANA; VENEZUELA; BRAZIL: states of Mato Grosso, Piau��, Rond��nia and Roraima. NEW RECORDS: Esp��rito Santo and Minas Gerais. Material examined. Three nymphs mounted on slides, BRAZIL, Minas Gerais, Pingo da ��gua, Rio Sacramento, 19��49���S / 42��18���W, 29.x.2005, Francischetti, C. N. & Salles, F.F. leg (CZNC). One nymph, BRAZIL, Esp��rito Santo, Sooretama, Rio S��o Jos��, 19��07���33.1������S / 40��14���26.1������, 23.i.2012, W, Nascimento, J.M.C. leg. (CZNC)., Published as part of Boldrini, R., Pes, A. M. O., Francischetti, C. N. & Salles, F. F., 2012, New species and new records of Camelobaetidius Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from Southeastern Brazil, pp. 17-30 in Zootaxa 3526 on page 23, {"references":["Dominique, Y., Thomas, A., Orth, K. & Dauta, C. (2001 a) Les Ephemeres de La Guyane Francaise. 2. Camelobaetidius billi et C. janae n. spp. (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae). Ephemera, 2000, 2 (1), 39 - 48.","Dominique, Y., Thomas, A., Dauta, C. & Horeau, V. (2001 b) Les Ephemeres de la Guyana Francaise. 4. Premier complement a l'invetaire generique, a but de biosurveillance: les Baetidae (Ephemeroptera). Ephemera, 2 (2), 93 - 103.","Dominique, Y., Thomas, A. & Fenoglio, S. (2002 b) Redescription de Camelobaetidius musseri (Traver & Edmunds, 1968) (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Ephemera (2001), 3 (1), 33 - 41.","Thomas, A., Peru, N. & Horeau, V. (2003 b) Les Ephemeres de la Guyane Francaise. 8. Description de Camelobaetidius matilei n. sp. et cle de determination de especes guyanensis de ce genre [Ephemeroptera: Baetidae]. Ephemera, 3 (2) 123 - 133.","Salles, F. F., Batista, J. D. & Cabette, H. R. S. (2004 b) Baetidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) de Nova Xavantina, Mato Grosso, Brasil: Novos registros e descricao de uma nova especie de Cloeodes Traver. Biota Neotropica, 4, 1 - 8.","Salles, F. F., Da-Silva, E. R., Hubbard, M. D. & Serrao, J. E. (2004 c) As especies de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) registradas para o Brasil. Biota Neotropica, 4 (2), 1 - 34.","Salles, F. F. & Serrao, J. E. (2005) The nymphs of the genus Camelobaetidius Demoulin (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) in Brazil: new species, new records, and key for the identification of the species. Annales de Limnologie, 41, 267 - 279.","Dominguez, E., Molineri, C., Pescador, M. L., Hubbard, M. D. & Nieto, C. (2006) Ephemeroptera of South America. In Aquatic Biodiversity of Latin America (J. Adis, J. R. Arias, G. Rueda-Delgado & K. M. Wantzen, eds.). Vol. 2, Pensoft, Moscowsofia, p. 1 - 646.","Falcao, J. N., Salles, F. F. & Hamada, N. (2011) Baetidae (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) ocorrentes em Roraima, Brasil: novos registros e chaves para generos e especies no estagio ninfal. Revista Brasileira de Entomol ogia, 55 (4), 516 - 548.","Nieto, C., Grillet, M. E., Dominguez, E., Molineri, C. & Guerrero, E. (2011) The Family Baetidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) from Venezuelan Guyana's Uplands. Zootaxa, 2808, 1 - 17.","Boldrini, R., Cruz, P. V., Salles, F. F., Belmont, E. L. & Hamada, N. (2012) Baetidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) from northeastern Brazil. Check list 8 (1), 88 - 94."]}