Search

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is characterized by low cytotoxic lymphocytes, abundant immune-suppressive cells, and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Preclinical PDA models showed the HDAC inhibitor entinostat reduced myeloid cell immunosuppression, sensitizing tumors to ICI therapy. This phase II study combined entinostat with nivolumab (PD1 inhibitor) in patients with advanced PDA (NCT03250273). Patients received entinostat 5 mg orally once weekly for 14-day lead-in, followed by entinostat and nivolumab. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included safety, duration of response, progression free-survival and overall survival. Between November 2017 and November 2020, 27 evaluable patients were enrolled. Three showed partial responses (11% ORR, 95% CI, 2.4%-29.2%) with a median response duration of 10.2 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were, respectively, 1.89 (95% CI, 1.381-2.301) and 2.729 (95% CI, 1.841-5.622) months. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19 patients (63%), including decreased lymphocyte count, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hyponatremia. As exploratory analysis, peripheral and tumor immune profiles changes were assessed using CyTOF, mIHC, and RNA-seq. Entinostat increased dendritic cell activation and maturation. Gene expression analysis revealed an enrichment in inflammatory response pathways with combination treatment. Although the primary endpoint was not met, entinostat and nivolumab showed durable responses in a small subset of PDA patients. Myeloid cell immunomodulation supported the preclinical hypothesis, providing a basis for future combinatorial therapies to enhance clinical benefits in PDA., Competing Interests: Competing interests M.B. served on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Incyte. C.B.B is an employee of, and holds equity in, Akoya Biosciences, Inc. W.J.H. reports patent royalties from Rodeo/Amgen; grants from Sanofi, NeoTX, and Riboscience; speaking/travel honoraria from Exelixis and Standard BioTools. MY receives grant/research support (to Johns Hopkins) from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Incyte, and Genentech; receives honoraria from Genentech, Exelixis, AstraZeneca, Replimune, Hepion, Lantheus; MY is the co-inventor of patents pertaining to cancer vaccines and is a cofounder with equity of Adventris Pharmaceuticals, all outside of the submitted work. E.J.F is on the scientific advisory board for Resistance Bio, has consulted for Merck and Mestag Therapeutics, and receives research grants from Roche/Genetech and Abbvie Inc. L.M.C. has received reagent support from Cell Signaling Technologies, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ZielBio, Inc., and Hibercell, Inc.; holds sponsored research agreements with Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Hibercell, Inc., Prospect Creek Foundation, Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Susan G. Komen Foundation, and the National Foundation for Cancer Research; is on the Advisory Board for Dispatch Biotherapeutics, Carisma Therapeutics, Inc., CytomX Therapeutics, Inc., Shasqi, Kineta, Inc., Hibercell, Inc., Cell Signaling Technologies, Inc., Alkermes, Inc., Raska Pharma, Inc., NextCure, Guardian Bio, AstraZeneca Partner of Choice Network (OHSU Site Leader), Genenta Sciences, Pio Therapeutics Pty Ltd., and Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research Therapeutics Working Group, Inc. E.J. reports other support from Abmeta, other support from Adventris, personal fees from Achilles, personal fees from DragonFly, non-financial support from Parker Institute, personal fees from Surge, grants from Lustgarten, grants from Genentech, personal fees from Mestag, personal fees from Medical Home Group, non-financial support from BMS, grants from Break Through Cancer, personal fees from CPRIT, personal fees from Neuvogen, non-financial support from HDT Bio, and personal fees from NeoTx outside the submitted work. N.S.A. receives grant/research support (to Johns Hopkins) from Bristol-Myers Squibb. L.D., J.N.D., L.C., D.N.S., J.A.T., S.C., N.G., A.H., C.T., R.W., J.L., S.M., B.C., A.S., D.A.G., S.Y. declare no competing interest related to this study., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Novel abortive treatments for migraine, ditans and gepants, have promising implications in triptan-insufficient responders with minimal existing comparative data. Our study aims to synthesize evidence through a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the comparative efficacy of lasmiditan, rimegepant and ubrogepant in triptan-insufficient responders., Method: We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and EBSCO Open Dissertations up to May 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared novel abortive treatments, including lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant, in migraine patients who self-reported insufficient response to triptans. Outcomes are represented using relative risks with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank each medication., Results: A total of five phase 3 RCTs involving 3,004 patients were included in the analysis. All three agents were significantly superior to placebo for two-hour pain freedom (RR = 1.93, 95% CI [1.52, 2.46]), freedom from the most bothersome symptoms at two hours (RR = 1.55, 95% CI [1.37, 1.75]), and pain relief at two hours (RR = 1.46, 95% CI [1.35, 1.58]). No statistically significant differences in efficacy outcomes were observed among the three agents. However, lasmiditan 200 mg had the highest cumulative probability for two-hour pain freedom and relief (SUCRA 0.9, 0.8, respective), while rimegepant led in relieving the most bothersome symptoms (SUCRA 0.7)., Conclusion: Lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant are effective for acute treatment of migraine in triptan-insufficient responders, with high-dose lasmiditan showing the highest efficacy for pain control., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The development of resistance to current standard-of-care treatments, such as androgen receptor (AR) targeting therapies, remains a major challenge in the management of advanced prostate cancer. There is an urgent need for new therapeutic strategies targeting key resistant drivers, such as AR variants like AR-V7, and steroidogenic enzymes, such as aldo-keto reductase 1C3 (AKR1C3), to overcome drug resistance and improve outcomes for patients with advanced prostate cancer. Here, we have designed, synthesized, and characterized a novel class of LX compounds targeting both the AR/AR variants and AKR1C3 pathways. Molecular docking and in vitro studies demonstrated that LX compounds bind to the AKR1C3 active sites and inhibit AKR1C3 enzymatic activity. LX compounds were also shown to reduce AR/AR-V7 expression and to inhibit their target gene signaling. LX1 inhibited the conversion of androstenedione into testosterone in tumor-based ex vivo enzyme assays. In addition, LX1 inhibited the growth of cells resistant to antiandrogens including enzalutamide (Enza), abiraterone, apalutamide, and darolutamide in vitro. A synergistic effect was observed when LX1 was combined with antiandrogens and taxanes, indicating the potential for this combination in treating resistant prostate cancer. Treatment with LX1 significantly decreased tumor volume, serum PSA levels, as well as reduced intratumoral testosterone levels, without affecting mouse body weight. Furthermore, LX1 was found to overcome resistance to Enza treatment, and its combination with Enza further suppressed tumor growth in both the CWR22Rv1 xenograft and LuCaP35CR patient-derived xenograft models. Collectively, the dual effect of LX1 in reducing AR signaling and intratumoral testosterone, along with its synergy with standard therapies in resistant models, underscores its potential as a valuable treatment option for advanced prostate cancer. Significance: LX1 simultaneously targets androgen receptor variants and the steroidogenic enzyme AKR1C3, offering a promising approach to combat drug resistance and enhancing therapeutic efficacy in conjunction with standard treatments for advanced prostate cancer., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Several lung function endpoints are utilized in clinical trials of inhaled bronchodilators for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) is a commonly reported endpoint in COPD trials and can be complemented by area under the FEV 1 vs time curve (FEV 1 AUC), which provides information on duration and consistency of bronchodilation over a dosing interval. Revefenacin, a once-daily bronchodilator, significantly improved lung function in patients with COPD when measured by trough FEV 1 in two replicate Phase 3 trials. Here, we report an FEV 1 AUC substudy using data from these trials., Patients and Methods: This post hoc analysis examined substudy data from 12-week replicate Phase 3 trials (NCT02459080/NCT02512510); patients with moderate to very severe COPD were randomized 1:1 to revefenacin 175 μg or placebo once daily. The substudy patients had FEV 1 AUC 0-2h assessed on Day 1, and those who continued to Day 84 also underwent 24-hour serial spirometry postdose where FEV 1 AUC 0-2h, AUC 0-12h , AUC 12-24h , and AUC 0-24h were evaluated., Results: Fifty and 47 patients who received revefenacin and placebo underwent 24-hour serial spirometry; most baseline characteristics were aligned between groups. At Day 84 postdose, revefenacin demonstrated sustained improvements in bronchodilation over 24 hours; differences in least squares mean vs placebo were 282, 220, 205, and 212 mL for FEV 1 AUC 0-2h , AUC 0-12h , AUC 12-24h , and AUC 0-24h (all P <0.001), respectively., Conclusion: This substudy analysis supplements previous findings that revefenacin provides sustained bronchodilation over 24 hours. Assessing additional complementary COPD clinical trial endpoints can help clinicians make treatment decisions., Competing Interests: Corey J. Witenko is a current employee of Theravance Biopharma US, Inc. and owns stock. Melinda K. Lacy is a current employee of Theravance Biopharma US, Inc. and owns stock. Ann W. Olmsted is a paid consultant for Theravance Biopharma US, Inc. and owns stock. Edmund J. Moran is a current employee of Theravance Biopharma US, Inc. and owns stock. In addition, Edmund J. Moran has a patent US11484531 licensed to Viatris. Donald A. Mahler serves on the advisory boards of AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Theravance, Verona, and Viatris and receives royalties from pharmaceutical companies (Elpen Pharmaceutical Company and University of Aberdeen) for the use of baseline dyspnea index/transition dyspnea index. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 LeMaster et al.)

The antiviral drug tecovirimat* has been used extensively to treat U.S. mpox cases since the start of a global outbreak in 2022. Mutations in the mpox viral protein target (F13 or VP37) that occur during treatment can result in resistance to tecovirimat † (1,2). CDC and public health partners have conducted genetic surveillance of monkeypox virus (MPXV) for F13 mutations through sequencing and monitoring of public databases. MPXV F13 mutations associated with resistance have been reported since 2022, typically among severely immunocompromised mpox patients who required prolonged courses of tecovirimat (3-5). A majority of patients with infections caused by MPXV with resistant mutations had a history of tecovirimat treatment; however, spread of tecovirimat-resistant MPXV was reported in California during late 2022 to early 2023 among persons with no previous tecovirimat treatment (3). This report describes a second, unrelated cluster of tecovirimat-resistant MPXV among 18 persons with no previous history of tecovirimat treatment in multiple states., Competing Interests: All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Todd G. Smith reports that SIGA Technologies, the owner of TPOXX, provided the drug used in the study under a material transfer agreement. Nicole M. Green reports serving as president of the Southern California Society for Microbiology. Daisy McGrath reports support from the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. Meilan Bielby reports unpaid membership on the Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) Infectious Disease and Public Health Preparedness committees. Danielle Haydel reports institutional support from APHL to attend the APHL conference. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Purpose: Retinal ischemia-reperfusion (RIR) injury is implicated in various retinal diseases, leading to retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) degeneration. Microglial senescence exacerbates inflammation, contributing to neurodegeneration. This study aimed to investigate the potential therapeutic role of Roflumilast (Roflu) in ameliorating microglial senescence and neuroinflammation following RIR injury., Methods: C57BL/6J mice underwent RIR surgery, and Roflu treatment was administered intraperitoneally. BV2 microglial cells were subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation and reoxygenation (OGD/R) to simulate ischemic conditions in vitro. SA-β-gal staining was used to detect cellular senescence. Quantitative PCR and ELISA were used to examine the levels of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) factors. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed on retinal sections to assess retinal morphology and thickness. Surviving RGCs were labeled and quantified in retinal whole-mounts using immunofluorescence (IF). Furthermore, Western blot and IF staining were used to quantify the proteins associated with the cell cycle and NLRP3 inflammasomes., Results: Roflu treatment reduced microglial senescence, ROS production, and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines in OGD/R-exposed BV2 cells. It also restored cell proliferation capacity and reversed OGD/R-induced cell cycle arrest. In vivo, Roflu alleviated retinal senescence, preserved retinal thickness, and protected against RGCs death in the RIR mouse model. Mechanistically, Roflu inhibited the NLRP3 inflammasome activation and suppressed DNA damage signaling pathway in microglia., Conclusions: Roflu exerts neuroprotective effects by mitigating microglial senescence and inflammation via inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome in RIR injury. These findings suggest that Roflu may serve as a promising therapeutic strategy for retinal diseases associated with ischemic injury by targeting microglial senescence.

Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed tumours among men. Second-generation androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) agents, namely abiraterone acetate (AbA) and enzalutamide (ENZ), are currently used in the management of metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC). However, the treatment is challenging due to the lack of prognostic biomarkers. Meanwhile, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have emerged as potential prognostic indicators of mCRPC. Thus, this study evaluated the impact of relevant SNPs on the treatment outcomes of 123 mCRPC patients enrolled in a hospital-based cohort study. The CYP17A1 rs2486758 C allele was associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of developing castration resistance (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.55; p = 0.003). Among patients without metastasis at tumour diagnosis and under AbA, a marginal association between YBX1 rs10493112 and progression-free survival was detected (log-rank test, p = 0.056). In the same subgroup, significant associations of HSD3B1 rs1047303 (CC/CA vs. AA; HR = 3.41; p = 0.025), YBX1 rs12030724 (AT vs. AA; HR = 3.54; p = 0.039) and YBX1 rs10493112 (log-rank test, p = 0.041; CC vs. AA/AC; HR = 3.22; p = 0.053) with overall survival were also observed, which were confirmed by multivariate Cox analyses. Although validation with larger cohorts is required, these findings suggest that SNPs could enhance the prognosis assessment of mCRPC patients, leading to a more personalised treatment.

Advancements in human-engineered heart tissue have enhanced the understanding of cardiac cellular alteration. Nevertheless, a human model simulating pathological remodeling following myocardial infarction for therapeutic development remains essential. Here we develop an engineered model of myocardial repair that replicates the phased remodeling process, including hypoxic stress, fibrosis, and electrophysiological dysfunction. Transcriptomic analysis identifies nine critical signaling pathways related to cellular fate transitions, leading to the evaluation of seventeen modulators for their therapeutic potential in a mini-repair model. A scoring system quantitatively evaluates the restoration of abnormal electrophysiology, demonstrating that the phased combination of TGFβ inhibitor SB431542, Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632, and WNT activator CHIR99021 yields enhanced functional restoration compared to single factor treatments in both engineered and mouse myocardial infarction model. This engineered heart tissue repair model effectively captures the phased remodeling following myocardial infarction, providing a crucial platform for discovering therapeutic targets for ischemic heart disease., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: This phase 1b study evaluated safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and rituximab (AVR) in treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma (TN MCL). Patients received acalabrutinib from cycle 1 until progressive disease (PD) or undue toxicity, rituximab for 6 cycles with maintenance every other cycle through cycle 24 or until PD, and venetoclax, beginning at cycle 2, for 24 cycles. Twenty-one patients were enrolled; 95.2% completed induction (6 AVR cycles) and 47.6% continued acalabrutinib maintenance. Thirteen (61.9%) patients had grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), most commonly neutropenia (33.3%). Seven (33.3%) patients had COVID-19 infection (6 [28.6%] serious AEs and 5 [23.8%] deaths, all among unvaccinated patients). There was no grade ≥3 atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, major hemorrhages, or tumor lysis syndrome. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100% (95% CI, 83.9-100.0) with 71.4% complete response. With median follow-up of 27.8 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 90.5% (95% CI, 67.0-97.5) and 63.2% (95% CI, 34.7-82.0), respectively; both were 95% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 95.2% (95% CI, 70.7-99.3) and 75.2% (95% CI, 50.3-88.9), respectively; both were 100% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. Overall, 87.5% of patients with available minimal residual disease (MRD) data achieved MRD negativity (10-6; next-generation sequencing) during treatment. AVR represents a chemotherapy-free regimen for TN MCL and resulted in high ORR and high rates of MRD negativity. The trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02717624., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

The combination of ASC22, an anti-PD-L1 antibody potentially enhancing HIV-specific immunity and chidamide, a HIV latency reversal agent, may serve as a strategy for antiretroviral therapy-free virological control for HIV. People living with HIV, having achieved virological suppression, were enrolled to receive ASC22 and chidamide treatment in addition to their antiretroviral therapy. Participants were monitored over 24 weeks to measure changes in viral dynamics and the function of HIV-specific CD8 + T cells (NCT05129189). 15 participants completed the study. At week 8, CA HIV RNA levels showed a significant increase from baseline, and the values returned to baseline after discontinuing ASC22 and chidamide. The total HIV DNA was only transiently increased at week 4 (P = 0.014). In contrast, integrated HIV DNA did not significantly differ from baseline. Increases in the proportions of effector memory CD4 + and CD8 + T cells (T EM ) were observed from baseline to week 24 (P = 0.034 and P = 0.002, respectively). The combination treatment did not succeed in enhancing the function of HIV Gag/Pol- specific CD8 + T cells. Nevertheless, at week 8, a negative correlation was identified between the proportions of HIV Gag-specific T EM cells and alterations in integrated DNA in the T cell function improved group (P = 0.042 and P = 0.034, respectively). Nine adverse events were solicited, all of which were graded 1 and resolved spontaneously. The combined treatment of ASC22 and chidamide was demonstrated to be well-tolerated and effective in activating latent HIV reservoirs. Further investigations are warranted in the context of analytic treatment interruption., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare neoplasms with an increasing annual incidence and prevalence. Many are metastatic at presentation or recur following surgical resection and require systemic therapy, for which somatostatin analogs such as octreotide or lanreotide comprise typical first-line therapies. Nonetheless, treatment options remain limited. Epigenetic processes such as histone modifications have been implicated in malignant transformation and progression. In this study, we evaluated the anti-proliferative effects of a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, entinostat, which was computationally predicted to show anti-cancer activity, as confirmed in in vitro and in vivo models of GEP-NETs., Methods: This was a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of entinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory abdominal NETs. The primary objective was to estimate the objective response rate to entinostat. Additionally, with each patient as his/her own control we estimated the rates of tumor growth prior to enrollment on study and while receiving entinostat. Patients received 5 mg entinostat weekly until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The dose could be changed to 10 mg biweekly for patients who did not experience grade ≥ 2 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in cycle 1, but was primarily administered at the starting 5 mg weekly dose., Results: The study enrolled only 5 patients due to early termination by the drug sponsor. The first patient that enrolled had advanced disease and died within days of enrollment before follow-up imaging due to a grade 5 AE unrelated to study treatment and was considered non-evaluable. Best RECIST response for the remaining 4 patients was stable disease (SD) with time on study of 154+, 243, 574, and 741 days. With each patient as his/her own control, rates of tumor growth on entinostat were markedly reduced with rates 17%, 20%, 33%, and 68% of the rates prior to enrollment on study. Toxicities possibly or definitely related to entinostat included grade 2/3 neutrophil count decrease [2/4 (50%)/ 2/4 (50%)], grade 3 hypophosphatemia [1/4, (25%)], grade 1/2 fatigue [1/4 (25%)/ 2/4 (50%)], and other self-limiting grade 1/2 AEs., Conclusion: In the treatment of relapsed or refractory abdominal NETs, entinostat 5 mg weekly led to prolonged SD and reduced the rate of tumor growth by 32% to 83% with an acceptable safety profile (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03211988)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Comprehensive genomic profiling is highly recommended for treatment decision in nonsquamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, rare genomic alterations are still being unveiled, with scarce data to guide therapy. Herein, we describe the treatment journey of a 56-year-old, never-smoker Caucasian woman with a metastatic NSCLC harboring a CD47-MET fusion, initially classified as a variant of unknown significance. She had undergone 3 lines of therapy over the course of 3 years, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and anti-angiogenic therapy. After reanalysis of her next-generation sequencing data in our service, the fusion was reclassified as likely oncogenic. The patient was started with fourth-line capmatinib, with a good tolerance so far and a complete metabolic response in the active sites of disease, currently ongoing for 18 months. In conclusion, we highlight the sensitivity of a novel MET fusion to capmatinib and emphasize the need for comprehensive panels in NSCLC and molecular tumor board discussions with specialized centers when rare findings arise., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutation is a rare alteration in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), occurring in about 3%-4% of cases. Here we report disease and patient characteristics, and efficacy and tolerability of MET inhibitors among advanced METex14 NSCLC patients from the Italian real-world registry ATLAS., Materials and Methods: Clinical-pathological and molecular data, and treatment efficacy/tolerability outcomes were retrospectively collected from the ATLAS registry., Results: From July 2020 to July 2023 a total of 146 METex14 advanced NSCLC patients were included across 27 Italian centers. Median age was 74 years, and most patients were male (52%), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < 2 (72%) and adenocarcinoma subtype (83%). One hundred and twenty-five out of 146 (86%) patients received at least one line of systemic anticancer therapy. Fifty-six (38%) were treated with capmatinib and 34 (23%) with tepotinib. 29% and 52% of them received targeted treatment in the first and second line, respectively. In the cohort of patients treated with MET inhibitors, the response rate (RR) was 37% (33% in previously treated patients and 46% in treatment-naïve) with a disease control rate of 62%. With a median follow-up of 10.8 months, progression-free survival was 6.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-8.3 months] and overall survival was 10.7 months (95% CI 7.2-19.3 months). In patients with measurable brain metastases (17 cases), the intracranial RR was 41%. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 12% of patients with grade 3 peripheral edema in 7% of cases. A fatal adverse reaction occurred in one patient due to pneumonitis. TRAEs-related dose reduction and discontinuation were reported in 6% and 8% of cases, respectively., Conclusion: Capmatinib and tepotinib represent an effective treatment option in NSCLC patients with METex14. Real-world efficacy outcomes are worse than those reported in prospective clinical trials. Their activity is more pronounced in the treatment-naïve population, suggesting that this is the right setting in the management of patients with METex14., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Psoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. First-line topical treatments include steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, vitamin D analogs, and anthralin. Recently, novel topical therapeutics like tapinarof and roflumilast have emerged with unique anti-inflammatory mechanisms and promising efficacy profiles., Materials and Methods: This review utilized PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases to identify recent studies on tapinarof and roflumilast. Criteria focused on efficacy, safety profiles, and therapeutic roles in psoriasis treatment., Results: Four primary literature articles were identified for tapinarof and five for roflumilast. Both drugs demonstrated strong efficacy with minimal adverse events in treating mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis. Tapinarof showed more frequent but mild adverse effects, while roflumilast had less frequent but more severe side effects., Discussion: Tapinarof and roflumilast offer once-daily dosing and successful treatment in restricted areas, potentially enhancing patient adherence. Cost remains a limiting factor, necessitating future comparative studies to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness between the two drugs., Conclusion: Tapinarof and roflumilast present promising topical treatments for psoriasis, showing efficacy and manageable safety profiles. Further research is crucial to fully elucidate their comparative benefits and drawbacks in clinical practice., (© 2024 The Author(s). Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Oncogenic signaling through the MAPK/ERK pathway drives tumor progression in many cancers. Although targeted MAPK/ERK pathway inhibitors improve survival in selected patients, most tumors are resistant. New drugs could be identified in small-animal models that, unlike in vitro models, can address oral uptake, compound bioavailability, and toxicity. This requires pharmacologic conformity between human and model MAPK/ERK pathways and available phenotypic assays. In this study, we test if the conserved MAPK/ERK pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans could serve as a model for pharmacological inhibition and develop in vivo pipelines for high-throughput compound screens. Using fluorescence-based image analysis of vulva development as a readout for MAPK/ERK activity, we obtained excellent assay Z-scores for the MEK inhibitors trametinib (Z = 0.95), mirdametinib (Z = 0.93), and AZD8330 (Z = 0.87), as well as the ERK inhibitor temuterkib (Z = 0.86). The throughput was 800 wells per hour, with an average seed density of 25.5 animals per well. Readouts included drug efficacy, toxicity, and pathway specificity, which was tested against pathway activating upstream (lin-15)- and downstream (lin-1) mutants. To validate the model in a high-throughput setting, we screened a blinded library of 433 anticancer compounds and identified four MEK inhibitors among seven positive hits. Our results highlight a high degree of pharmacological conformity between C. elegans and human MAPK/ERK pathways, and the presented high-throughput pipeline may discover and characterize novel inhibitors in vivo., Significance: Many tumors depend on MAPK/ERK signaling to sustain growth, avoid cell death, and metastasize. We show that specific and clinically relevant MAPK/ERK signaling inhibitors can be discovered in vivo with a high-throughput screening pipeline in small animals., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objective: Thumbtack Needling (TN) has been employed in the treatment of functional constipation (FC), although the existing evidence supporting its effectiveness is limited. This study is to evaluate the efficacy of TN in ameliorating FC., Method: A total of 482 eligible patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the TN group or the Mosapride Citrate (MC) group. The TN was buried once for three days, rest for one day after two consecutive burials, followed by a 4-week follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the score for Complete and spontaneous bowel movement score (CSBMs). Secondary outcome measures included the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), Cleveland Clinic Score (CCS), and the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAC-QOL)., Results: Out of the 482 patients randomized, 241 were allocated to each group. Of these, 216 patients (89.6 %) in both groups completed the intervention and follow-up. Compared with the baseline, the differences of CSBMs in TN group [1.76(95 % CI, 1.61 to 1.91)] and MC group [1.35(95 % CI, 1.20 to 1.50)] at week 4 meet the threshold for minimal clinically important difference (MCID). However, there were no clinical difference from baseline at week 2 and week 8 in both groups. Mean CSBMs at week 4 was 3.35 ± 0.99 in the TN group and 3 ± 1.03 in the MC group (adjusted difference between groups, 0.37 points [95 % CI, 0.18 to 0.55]; P < 0.001), although differences between the two groups did not meet the MCID threshold., Conclusion: Compared with mosapride citrate, thumbtack needling produced a greater improvement in CSBMs, although the difference from control was not clinically significant., Gov Identifier: ChiCTR2100043684., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) are highly malignant and aggressive hematologic tumors for which there is no standard first-line treatment. Chidamide, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, shows great promise. We assessed the efficacy and safety of an irradiation-containing conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and post-transplantation chidamide maintenance in patients with T-ALL/LBL., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of six patients with T-ALL/LBL who underwent allo-HSCT with a radiotherapy-containing pretreatment regimen and post-transplant chidamide maintenance therapy. The endpoints were relapse, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), transplant-related mortality (TRM), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs)., Results: All of the patients had uneventful post-transplant hematopoietic reconstitution, and all achieved complete molecular remission within 30 days. All six patients survived, and two relapsed with a median relapse time of 828.5 (170-1335) days. The 1-year OS rate was 100%, the 2-year PFS rate was 66.7%, and the TRM rate was 0%. After transplantation, two patients developed grade I-II acute GVHD (2/6); grade III-IV acute and chronic GVHD were not observed. The most common AEs following chidamide administration were hematological AEs, which occurred to varying degrees in all patients; liver function abnormalities occurred in two patients (grade 2), and symptoms of malaise occurred in one patient (grade 1)., Conclusion: Chidamide maintenance therapy after T-ALL/LBL transplantation is safe, but the efficacy needs to be further investigated.

Enzalutamide (Enz) is commonly utilized as the initial treatment strategy for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). However, a notable subset of patients may experience resistance to Enz, resulting in reduced effectiveness. Utilizing Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases, we identified CBX2 as a crucial factor in mediating resistance to Enz, primarily due to its inhibitory effect on the P53 signaling pathway. Silencing of CBX2 using small interfering RNA (siRNA) led to elevated levels of P53 expression in LNCaP cells. This indicates that CBX2 may have a critical effect on PCa Enz resistance and could serve as a promising therapeutic target for individuals with Enz resistance., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: This study evaluated the long-term safety of roflumilast in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or chronic bronchitis using electronic healthcare databases from Germany, Norway, Sweden, and the United States (US)., Patients and Methods: The study population consisted of patients aged ≥40 years who had been exposed to roflumilast and a matched cohort unexposed to roflumilast. The matching was based on sex, age, calendar year of cohort entry date (2010-2011, 2012, or 2013), and a propensity score that included variables such as demographics, markers of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity and morbidity, and comorbidities. In comparison to the unexposed matched cohort (never use), three exposure definitions were used for the exposed matched cohort: ever use, use status (current, recent, past use), and cumulative duration of use. The main outcome was 5-year all-cause mortality. Cox regression models were used to estimate crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Results: 112,541 unexposed and 23,239 exposed patients across countries were included. Some variables remained unbalanced after matching, indicating higher COPD disease severity among the exposed patients. Adjusted HRs of 5-year all-cause mortality for "ever use" of roflumilast, compared to "never use", were 1.12 (95% CI, 1.08-1.17) in Germany, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.92-1.08) in Norway, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.92-1.04) in Sweden, and 1.16 (95% CI, 1.12-1.20) in the US. Compared to never users, there was a decrease in 5-year mortality risk observed among "current users" in Germany (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88-0.98), Norway (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.87), and Sweden (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.88)., Conclusion: There was no observed increase in 5-year mortality risk with the use of roflumilast in Sweden or Norway. A small increase in 5-year mortality risk was observed in Germany and the US in the ever versus never comparison, likely due to residual confounding by indication., Competing Interests: Edeltraut Garbe has been chairwoman of the Department of Clinical Epidemiology at the Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS and in this function occasionally performed studies for pharmaceutical industries. The pharmaceutical companies included Byk-Gulden, Nycomed, Bayer, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi Pasteur MSD, and STADA. She has been a consultant to Bayer-Schering, Nycomed, GlaxoSmithKline, Schwabe, Teva, and Novartis, as well as to AstraZeneca (including this study). Per Arkhammar, Marie Carlholm, Eileen O Dareng, Harald Fjällbrant, and Stefan Franzén are employees and shareholders of AstraZeneca. Atul Kumar is an employee of AstraZeneca. Tore Persson is an AstraZeneca contractor and shareholder. Cecilia Hedlund is an AstraZeneca contractor. Gunnar Johansson has served on advisory boards arranged by AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Teva. Bianca Kollhorst, Wiebke Schäfer, and Tania Schink are working at an independent, non-profit research institute, the Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS. Unrelated to this study, BIPS occasionally conducts studies financed by the pharmaceutical industry. These are post-authorization safety studies (PASS) requested by health authorities and performed in line with the ENCePP Code of Conduct. Fabian Hoti, Muriel Lobier, Aaro Salosensaari, Xu Qiao, and Vasili Mushnikov are employed by IQVIA, a contract research organization that conducts studies financed by the pharmaceutical industry. Nicholas Sicignano and Kristian Svendsen confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 Garbe et al.)

Background: Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is known for its unfavorable survival prognosis. Chidamide has shown efficacy in relapsed/refractory AITL, but its efficacy in newly diagnosed AITL is uncertain., Objective: This retrospective research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chidamide when used with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and vincristine (CHOP) in comparison to CHOP by itself for individuals newly diagnosed with AITL, and to examine the impact of transplantation., Method: This was an analysis that compared outcomes among patients who received chidamide + CHOP on a clinical trial vs. historical controls who received CHOP alone, enrolling a total of sixty-six treatment-naive AITL patients between April 2014 and November 2022. Among them, thirty-three received chidamide in addition to CHOP (chidamide group), while thirty-three received CHOP alone (control group). The clinical characteristics were balanced between the two groups. All patients were scheduled to undergo up to six courses of treatment before transplantation., Results: The chidamide group had a significantly longer median overall survival (OS) compared to the control group, with a median OS that was not reached, as opposed to 20 months in the control group (p = 0.002). In the control group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11 months, while in the chidamide group, it was 22 months (p = 0.080). In the high-risk group (IPI ≥ 3), the chidamide group demonstrated notably superior complete response (CR) and overall response rate (ORR) compared to the control cohort (p = 0.002, p = 0.034). The PFS and OS in the chidamide group were not reached, and there were significant differences compared to the control group (p = 0.007, p = 0.003). The median OS of the transplanted group was longer than the non-transplanted group (p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, chidamide group reduced the hazards of death in the total cohort., Conclusion: As the study was non-random and retrospective, Chidamide combined with chemotherapy should be tested in randomized trials given its potential to improve prognosis in treatment-naive AITL patients. Furthermore, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) has demonstrated enhanced overall survival in individuals with AITL., Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT03268889., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Zong, Yang, Zhou, Jin and Wu.)

HSD3B1 encodes 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1, which converts adrenal dehydroepiandrosterone to 5α-dihydrotestosterone and is inherited in adrenal-permissive (AP) or adrenal-restrictive forms. The AP allele is linked to castration resistance, mainly in low-volume tumors. Here, we investigate the association of HSD3B1 alleles with outcomes in ARCHES, a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial that demonstrated clinical benefit with enzalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) compared to those treated with placebo plus ADT. There are no significant differences between genotypes for clinical efficacy endpoints. Enzalutamide significantly improves radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival vs. placebo irrespective of HSD3B1 status. Men with the AP genotype have higher post-progression mortality and treatment-emergent adverse events, including hypertension, cardiovascular events, and gynecomastia, but a lower fracture rate. Overall, enzalutamide is beneficial in men with mHSPC independent of the HSD3B1 genotype. Inherited polymorphisms of HSD3B1 may account for differential toxicities., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests N.S. reports consulting for Celgene and Roivant, research funding from Astellas, and a filed patent application by Cleveland Clinic for a method of steroid-dependent disease treatment based on HSD3B1. A.A.A. reports honoraria from Aculeus Therapeutics, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Merck Serono, Novartis, Noxopharm, Pfizer, Sanofi, Telix, and Tolmar; consulting for Aculeus Therapeutics, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Merck Serono, Novartis, Noxopharm, Pfizer, Sanofi, Telix, and Tolmar; speakers’ bureau for Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Serono, and Novartis; grants from Aptevo (institutional), Astellas (institutional), Astellas (investigator), AstraZeneca (institutional), AstraZeneca (investigator), Bionomics (institutional), Bristol Myers Squibb (institutional), Exelixis (institutional), Gilead Sciences (institutional), GlaxoSmithKline (institutional), Hinova (institutional), Ipsen (institutional), Janssen (institutional), Lilly (institutional), MedImmune (institutional), Merck Serono (institutional), Merck Serono (investigator), Merck Sharpe & Dohme (institutional), Novartis (institutional), Pfizer (institutional), Sanofi Aventis (institutional), and Synthorx (institutional); travel/accommodation reimbursement from Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, Janssen, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Tolmar; participation on an advisory board for Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Merck Serono, Novartis, Noxopharm, Pfizer, Sanofi, Telix, and Tolmar; and participation as the chair of the Urologic Oncology Group for the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia and as a chair of the Translational Research Subcommittee and member of the Scientific Advisory Committee for the ANZUP Cancer Trials Group. J.W.D.H. reports consulting for Astellas. M.W. is an employee of Astellas and reports ownership of stock of ADMA Biologics, CASI, Merck, and Seelos. F.Z. is an employee of Pfizer and reports ownership of stock of Pfizer and AlloVir and patents with AlloVir. J.S. is an employee of Astellas and reports ownership of stock of AstraZeneca. G.P.H. is an employee of Astellas. A.S. reports consulting for Alere, Astellas, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ferring, Ipsen, Janssen, Roche, Steba Biotech, and Synergo; research funding from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cepheid, GenomeDx, Immatics, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Karl Storz, Medivation, Novartis, and Roche; patents for A290/99 implantable incontinence device, AT00/0001:C-Trap implantable device to treat urinary incontinence, and 2018/6579 gene-expression signature for subtype and prognostic prediction of renal cell carcinoma; expert testimony for GBA Pharma; and travel support from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, CureVac, Ferring, Ipsen, Janssen, and Sanofi/Aventis. A.J.A. reports research support (institutional) to Duke from the NIH/NCI, PCF/Movember, DOD, Astellas, Pfizer, Bayer, Janssen, Dendreon, BMS, AstraZeneca, Merck, Forma, Celgene, Amgen, and Novartis and personal compensation from consulting or advising relationships with Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Clovis, Dendreon, Epic Sciences, Exact Sciences, Exelixis, Forma, GoodRx, Janssen, Merck, Myovant, Novartis, Pfizer, and Point., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common childhood soft tissue sarcoma. For the alveolar subtype (ARMS), the presence of the PAX3::FOXO1 fusion gene and/or metastases are strong predictors of poor outcome. Metastatic PAX3::FOXO1 + ARMS often responds to chemotherapies initially, only to subsequently relapse and become resistant with most patients failing to survive beyond 8 years post-diagnosis. No curative intent phase II or phase III clinical trial has been available for patients in the past 10 years (ARST0921). Thus, metastatic ARMS represents a significantly unmet clinical need. Chemotherapy resistance in ARMS has previously been attributed to PAX3::FOXO1-mediated cell cycle checkpoint adaptation, which is mediated by an HDAC3-SMARCA4-miR-27a-PAX3::FOXO1 circuit that can be disrupted by HDAC3 inhibition. In this study, we investigated the therapeutic efficacy of combining the epigenetic regulator entinostat, a Class I Histone Deacetylase (HDAC1-3) inhibitor, with RMS-specific chemotherapies in patient derived xenograft (PDX) models of RMS. We identified single agent, additive or synergistic relationships between relapse-specific chemotherapies and clinically relevant drug exposures of entinostat in three PAX3::FOXO1 + ARMS mouse models. This preclinical data provides further rationale for clinical investigation of entinostat, already known to be well tolerated in a pediatric phase I clinical trial (ADVL1513)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is an asymptomatic condition with the potential to progress to metastasis. Novel hormonal agents (NHAs) are currently considered the gold standard treatment for nmCRPC, offering significant survival benefits. However, further evidence is needed to determine whether there are differences in the performance of these drugs among Asian populations., Methods: This retrospective analysis of nmCRPC patients aims to compare the efficacy and safety of three NHAs-apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide. Data were collected from two prominent prostate care centers in Taichung, Taiwan. Patient characteristics, treatment details, PSA responses, and adverse events were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were performed, and the study received Institutional Review Board approval., Results: Total of 64 patients were recruited in this study, including 29 darolutamide, 26 apalutamide, and 9 enzalutamide patients. Baseline characteristics varied between the three patient groups, but the treatment response still revealed similar results. The apalutamide group experienced more adverse events, notably skin rash. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events differed among the groups, and patients receiving darolutamide were less likely to discontinue treatment., Conclusion: This real-world study provides insights into NHA utilization in nmCRPC within the Taiwanese population. Adverse event profiles varied, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment decisions. The study underscores the importance of regional considerations and contributes valuable data for optimizing treatment outcomes in nmCRPC., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: In relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a negative prognosis is frequently linked to heightened epigenetic heterogeneity. Chidamide, a selective histone deacetylase inhibitor, shows promise as a targeted therapy for R/R DLBCL by targeting abnormal epigenetic changes associated with poor prognosis., Methods: A cohort of 27 ineligible patients with R/R DLBCL participated in an open - label, single - arm study. Chidamide was administered orally at a dose of 30 mg twice weekly for one week during the induction monotherapy phase. The subsequent combination therapy phase involved oral chidamide at a dose of 20 mg twice weekly for two weeks, followed by a one-week discontinuation period, in conjunction with intravenous R-GDP every 21 days., Results: Among the cohort of 31 patients who underwent screening (median age: 67 years), 27 were ultimately included in the study, with 14 individuals successfully completing six cycles of C-R-GDP treatment. The overall best objective response rate was determined to be 79.1% (95% CI: 75.1%-83.3%), comprising a complete response rate of 45.8% (95% CI: 41.6%-49.9%) and a partial response rate of 33.3% (95% CI: 29.3%-37.4%). Within the subgroup of 14 patients who completed the full treatment regimen, the best objective response rate reached 100%, with 71.4% achieving complete response (n = 10) and 28.6% achieving partial response (n = 4). The median follow-up period for these patients was 17.0 months, ranging from 3.5 to 55 months. Progression-free survival was 5.9 months and overall survival was 48.3 months. Anemia was the most common adverse event, affecting all patients. Thrombocytopenia led to treatment interruption or dose reduction in 13 patients. Other common adverse events included hypocalcemia, hyponatremia, and hypokalemia. Three patients experienced grade 3 pneumonitis and one had grade 3 skin rash., Conclusions: Chidamide combined with R-GDP is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with R/R DLBCL who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Importance: Abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide are recommended as preferred treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but differences in their relative efficacy are unclear due to a lack of head-to-head clinical trials. Clear guidance is needed for making informed mCRPC therapeutic choices., Objective: To compare clinical outcomes in patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included patients with mCRPC in the US Department of Veterans Affairs health care system who initiated treatment with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide between January 1, 2014, and October 30, 2022., Exposures: Abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide., Main Outcomes and Measures: The study used inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance baseline characteristics between patients initiating abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide and evaluated restricted mean survival time (RMST) differences in overall survival (OS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCS), time to next treatment switching or death (TTS), and time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (TTR) at different time points after treatment initiation., Results: The study included 5779 patients (median age, 74.42 years [IQR, 68.94-82.14 years]). Median follow-up was between 38 and 60 months. Patients initiating enzalutamide on average had longer OS than those initiating abiraterone acetate, with RMSTs of 24.29 months (95% CI, 23.58-24.99 months) and 23.38 months (95% CI, 22.85-23.92 months), respectively, and a difference in RMST of 0.90 months (95% CI, 0.02-1.79 months) at 4 years. Similarly, TTS and TTR were improved in patients initiating enzalutamide, with an RMST at 4 years of 1.95 months (95% CI, 0.92-2.99 months) longer for TTS and 3.57 months (95% CI, 1.76-5.38 months) shorter for TTR. For PCS, the RMST at 2 years was 0.48 months (95% CI, 0.01-0.95 months) longer. An examination of subgroups identified that enzalutamide initiation was associated with longer RMST in OS among patients without prior docetaxel treatment (1.14 months; 95% CI, 0.19-2.10 months) and in those with PSA doubling time of 3 months or longer (2.23 months; 95% CI, 0.81-3.66 months) but not among patients with prior docetaxel (-0.25 months; 95% CI, -2.59 to 2.09 months) or with PSA doubling time of less than 3 months (0.05 months; 95% CI, -1.05 to 1.15 months)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with mCRPC, initiation of enzalutamide was associated with small but statistically significant improvements in OS, PCS, TTS, and TTR compared with initiation of abiraterone acetate. The improvements were more prominent in short-term outcomes, including TTS and TTR, and in patient subgroups without prior docetaxel or with PSA doubling time longer than 3 months.

Importance: Novel androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs; darolutamide, enzalutamide, and apalutamide) are standard-of-care treatments for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). However, there are sparse data comparing their clinical use and tolerability., Objective: To compare clinical use and outcomes for darolutamide, enzalutamide, and apalutamide in patients with nmCRPC., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study reviewed electronic medical records from the Precision Point Specialty network of US urology practices. Eligible patients had nmCRPC and no prior novel hormonal therapy and initiated novel ARI treatment between August 1, 2019, and March 31, 2022. Data were analyzed from February 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022., Exposures: Patients were prescribed darolutamide, enzalutamide, or apalutamide as their first novel ARI for nmCRPC., Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was a composite of 2 end points, treatment discontinuation and progression to metastatic CRPC (mCRPC), whichever occurred first. Both end points were also assessed separately., Results: All 870 patients meeting eligibility criteria were included (362 receiving darolutamide [41.6%]; 382, enzalutamide [43.9%]; 126, apalutamide [14.5%]); mean (SD) age was 78.8 (8.7) years. Self-reported race was Black or African American in 187 patients (21.5%), White in 585 (67.2%), and other or unknown in 98 (11.3%). The darolutamide cohort had lower proportions of patients with a composite end point event (134 [37.0%] vs 201 [52.6%] for enzalutamide and 66 [52.4%] for apalutamide), discontinuation (110 [30.4%] for darolutamide vs 156 [40.8%] for enzalutamide and 58 [46.0%] for apalutamide), and progression to mCRPC (64 [17.7%] for darolutamide vs 108 [28.3%] for enzalutamide and 35 [27.8%] for apalutamide) during the study period. After adjusting for baseline covariates, patients receiving darolutamide had a lower risk of a composite end point event compared with enzalutamide (risk reduction, 33.8%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53-0.84]) and apalutamide (risk reduction, 35.1%; HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.48-0.88]). Similarly, patients receiving darolutamide had a lower risk of discontinuation compared with enzalutamide (risk reduction, 27.4%; HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.56-0.94]) and apalutamide (risk reduction, 39.1%; HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.44-0.85]) and a lower risk of progression to mCRPC compared with enzalutamide (risk reduction, 40.6%; HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.43-0.82]) and apalutamide (risk reduction, 35.3%; HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.42-0.99]). There was no difference between enzalutamide and apalutamide treatment across outcomes., Conclusions and Relevance: In this large cohort study of patients with nmCRPC treated with novel ARIs, results suggest better tolerability for darolutamide compared with enzalutamide and apalutamide, which may be associated with a clinical effectiveness advantage. Comparative clinical studies are needed to guide treatment decisions in the absence of head-to-head clinical trials.

Background: Inhibition of 5-HT3 (5-Hydroxyl Tryptamine) receptors is known to enhance morphine analgesia in animal models. We tested the efficacy of azasetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, on postoperative chronic pain after pulmonary surgery in a randomized triple-blind controlled study., Methods: A total of 250 patients who were scheduled to receive pulmonary surgery were randomized to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using 200 µg sufentanil with normal saline or 200 µg sufentanil with 20 mg azasetron. The numerical rating scale of pain (NRS) was recorded at baseline, postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, 3, 90, and 180. Negative binomial regression was used to identify associated factors for postoperative NRS six months after surgery., Results: The results showed that azasetron did not affect the primary outcomes: the incidence of postoperative chronic pain on POD90 and 180. However, azasetron decreased postoperative NRS at rest and activity on POD1, 2, and 3. Furthermore, azasetron decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting on POD1 and 2. Univariate and multivariate negative binomial regression analysis identified preoperative pain, smoking, drinking and open surgery are risk factors of chronic pain six months after surgery., Conclusions: Azasetron did not affect the incidence of chronic pain after pulmonary surgery. The presence of preoperative pain, smoking, drinking, and open surgery were found to be associated with chronic pain six months after surgery., Clinical Trial Registration: The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200060139), 20/05/2022; the site url is https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Costly targeted cancer treatments challenge publicly-funded healthcare systems seeking to align expected benefit with value for money. In 2021, The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) published a provisional funding algorithm for risk-based treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We estimate the cost-effectiveness of this algorithm against current standard of care. We constructed a probabilistic Markov model comparing next generation sequencing (NGS) assay-guided front-line treatment of acalabrutinib versus venetoclax with obinutuzumab to a comparator wherein patients initiate acalabrutinib. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Analyses were conducted from the British Columbia healthcare system perspective, with outcomes discounted at 1.5%. Assay informed treatment for patients with CLL resulted in an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $18,040 (95% CI $16,491-$19,501) per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The probability of the NGS guided treatment algorithm being cost effective was 80% at a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000 and a corresponding ICER of $18,040. Assay-guided treatment sequencing adds additional costs to healthcare but may be a cost-effective intervention for adult patients with CLL. Integration of real-world evidence would improve the validity and reliability of model estimated for decision-makers., (© 2024. Crown.)

Background Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are found in 1% of gliomas across children and adults. TRK inhibitors are promising therapeutic agents for NTRK-fused gliomas because they are tissue agnostic and cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Methods We investigated twelve NGS-verified NTRK-fused gliomas from a single institute, Seoul National University Hospital. Results The patient cohort included six children (aged 1-15 years) and six adults (aged 27-72 years). NTRK2 fusions were found in ten cerebral diffuse low-grade and high-grade gliomas (DLGGs and DHGGs, respectively), and NTRK1 fusions were found in one cerebral desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma and one spinal DHGG. In this series, the fusion partners of NTRK2 were HOOK3, KIF5A, GKAP1, LHFPL3, SLMAP, ZBTB43, SPECC1L, FKBP15, KANK1, and BCR, while the NTRK1 fusion partners were TPR and TPM3. DLGGs tended to harbour only an NTRK fusion, while DHGGs exhibited further genetic alterations, such as TERT promoter/TP53/PTEN mutation, CDKN2A/2B homozygous deletion, PDGFRA/KIT/MDM4/AKT3 amplification, or multiple chromosomal copy number aberrations. Four patients received adjuvant TRK inhibitor therapy (larotrectinib, repotrectinib, or entrectinib), among which three also received chemotherapy (n = 2) or proton therapy (n = 1). The treatment outcomes for patients receiving TRK inhibitors varied: one child who received larotrectinib for residual DLGG maintained stable disease. In contrast, another child with DHGG in the spinal cord experienced multiple instances of tumour recurrence. Despite treatment with larotrectinib, ultimately, the child died as a result of tumour progression. An adult patient with glioblastoma (GBM) treated with entrectinib also experienced tumour progression and eventually died. However, there was a successful outcome for a paediatric patient with DHGG who, after a second gross total tumour removal followed by repotrectinib treatment, showed no evidence of disease. This patient had previously experienced relapse after the initial surgery and underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell therapy with carboplatin/thiotepa and proton therapy. Conclusions Our study clarifies the distinct differences in the pathology and TRK inhibitor response between LGG and HGG with NTRK fusions., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: Before targeted therapies, patients with higher-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), defined as del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation (TP53m), unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region genes (uIGHV), or complex karyotype (CK), had poorer prognosis with chemoimmunotherapy. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) have demonstrated benefit in higher-risk patient populations with CLL in individual trials. To better understand the impact of the second-generation BTKi acalabrutinib, we pooled data from 5 prospective clinical studies of acalabrutinib as monotherapy or in combination with obinutuzumab (ACE-CL-001, ACE-CL-003, ELEVATE-TN, ELEVATE-RR, and ASCEND) in patients with higher-risk CLL in treatment-naive (TN) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) cohorts. A total of 808 patients were included (TN cohort, n = 320; R/R cohort, n = 488). Median follow-up was 59.1 months (TN cohort) and 44.3 months (R/R cohort); 51.3% and 26.8% of patients in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively, remained on treatment at last follow-up. In the del(17p)/TP53m, uIGHV, and CK subgroups in the TN cohort, median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were not reached (NR). In the del(17p)/TP53m, uIGHV, and CK subgroups in the R/R cohort, median PFS was 38.6 months, 46.9 months, and 38.6 months, respectively, and median OS was 60.6 months, NR, and NR, respectively. The safety profile of acalabrutinib-based therapy in this population was consistent with the known safety profile of acalabrutinib in a broad CLL population. Our analysis demonstrates long-term benefit of acalabrutinib-based regimens in patients with higher-risk CLL, regardless of line of therapy., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening condition characterized by hyperinflammation and organ failure, with a high mortality rate. Current first-line treatments for adult patients have limited efficacy and significant toxicity. The novel selective histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), chidamide, has shown promise in preclinical studies for the potential treatment of HLH., Methods: An open-label, single-center study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chidamide in combination with etoposide and glucocorticoids for the treatment of HLH in adult patients. Seventeen patients who fulfilled at least five of the eight HLH-2004 criteria were enrolled and treated with the combination therapy. The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR), and secondary outcomes included survival, safety and tolerability, and changes in laboratory indicators., Results: A total of 17 HLH patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study, with a male to female ratio of 1.8:1. The age range at enrollment was 31 to 71 years old, with a median age of 52 years old. The ORR was 76.5% (13/17 patients), with a complete response (CR) rate of 17.6% (3/17 patients) and a partial response (PR) rate of 58.8% (10/17 patients). The median overall survival (OS) was not achieved, with OS at 6 months and 12 months being 81% and 65%, respectively. The median progression free survival (PFS) was not achieved, with PFS at 6 months and 12 months being 68% and 55%, respectively. Hematologic toxicities is the most common. Safety profile was favorable, with very few cases of grade 3/4 toxicities observed. The results showed that the levels of sCD25, platelets, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and albumin in these patients were significantly improved 3 weeks after treatment., Conclusion: The addition of chidamide to etoposide and glucocorticoids may be a promising new treatment option for patients with HLH, with a high ORR, manageable safety profile, and significant improvement in laboratory indicators. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine the optimal dosing and duration of therapy., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Hu, Wang and Wang.)

Background: Although the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) has undergone advancements during the past several years, the response rate and long-term effects with respect to patients with PTCL remain unsatisfactory-particularly for relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients. This phase II trial was designed to explore the efficacy and safety of an all-oral regimen of chidamide plus prednisone, cyclophosphamide, and thalidomide (CPCT) for R/R PTCL patients who could not tolerate the standard chemotherapy for a variety of reasons., Methods: We conducted a multicenter phase II clinical trial in which we combined chidamide (30 mg twice weekly) with prednisone (20 mg daily after breakfast), cyclophosphamide (50 mg daily after lunch), and thalidomide (100 mg daily at bedtime) (the CPCT regimen) for a total of fewer than 12 cycles as an induction-combined treatment period, and then applied chidamide as single-drug maintenance. Forty-five patients were ultimately enrolled from August 2016 to April 2021 with respect to Chinese patients at nine centers. Our primary objective was to assess the overall response rate (ORR) after the treatment with CPCT., Results: Of the 45 enrolled patients, the optimal ORR and complete response (CR)/CR unconfirmed (CRu) were 71.1% (32/45) and 28.9% (13/45), respectively, and after a median follow-up period of 56 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.5 months and 17.2 months, respectively. The five-year PFS and OS rates were 21.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9-34.5%) and 43.8% (95% CI, 28.3-59.3%), respectively. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (20/45, 44.4%), but we observed no treatment-related death., Conclusion: The all-oral CPCT regimen was an effective and safe regimen for R/R PTCL patients who could not tolerate standard chemotherapy for various reasons., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02879526., (Copyright © 2024 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license.)

Background: Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase ( NTRK ) gene fusions are rare oncogenic drivers prevalent in 0.3% of solid tumors. They are most common in salivary gland cancer (2.6%), thyroid cancer (1.6%), and soft-tissue sarcoma (1.5%). Currently, there are 2 US Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted therapies for NTRK gene fusions: larotrectinib, approved in 2018, and entrectinib, approved in 2019. To date, the real-world uptake of tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitor (TRKi) use for NTRK -positive solid tumors in academic cancer centers remains largely unknown., Objective: To describe the demographics, clinical and genomic characteristics, and testing and treatment patterns of patients with NTRK -positive solid tumors treated at US academic cancer centers., Methods: This was a retrospective chart review study conducted in academic cancer centers in the United States. All patients diagnosed with an NTRK fusion-positive ( NTRK 1, NTRK 2, NTRK 3) solid tumor (any stage) and who received cancer treatment at participating sites between January 1, 2012, and July 1, 2023, were included in this study. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, genomic characteristics, NTRK testing data, and treatment patterns were collected from electronic medical records and analyzed using descriptive statistics as appropriate., Results: In total, 6 centers contributed data for 55 patients with NTRK -positive tumors. The mean age was 49.3 (SD = 20.5) years, 51% patients were female, and the majority were White (78%). The median duration of time from cancer diagnosis to NTRK testing was 85 days (IQR = 44-978). At the time of NTRK testing, 64% of patients had stage IV disease, compared with 33% at cancer diagnosis. Prevalent cancer types in the overall cohort included head and neck (15%), thyroid (15%), brain (13%), lung (13%), and colorectal (11%). NTRK 1 fusions were most common (45%), followed by NTRK 3 (40%) and NTRK 2 (15%). Across all lines of therapy, 51% of patients (n = 28) received a TRKi. Among TRKi-treated patients, 71% had stage IV disease at TRKi initiation. The median time from positive NTRK test to initiation of TRKi was 48 days (IQR = 9-207). TRKis were commonly given as first-line (30%) or second-line (48%) therapies. Median duration of therapy was 610 (IQR = 182-764) days for TRKi use and 207.5 (IQR = 42-539) days for all other first-line therapies., Conclusions: This study reports on contemporary real-world NTRK testing patterns and use of TRKis in solid tumors, including time between NTRK testing and initiation of TRKi therapy and duration of TRKi therapy.

The ARASENS trial recruited 1306 men with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer. It investigated the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and systemic therapy docetaxel in combination with a third novel drug - daralutamide, compared with placebo on overall survival. Triple therapy with ADT, docetaxel and darolutamide resulted in improved overall survival rates as compared with ADT, docetaxel and placebo (HR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57-0.80; p < 0.001). The side effect profile for both treatments was similar. This randomised, double blinded, placebo controlled study, was assessed to have a low risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool., (© 2024. Crown.)

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are implicated in various cancers, including those of the lung and thyroid. The prevalence of NTRK fusions is 0.1 to 0.3% in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and as high as 26% in pediatric papillary thyroid carcinoma. Detection methods include immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing. Management of NTRK fusion-positive lung cancer primarily involves targeted therapies, notably the tyrosine receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib. Both agents demonstrate high response rates and durable disease control, particularly in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung. They are preferred as first-line treatments because of their efficacy over immunotherapy. Possible adverse events include dizziness, weight gain, neuropathy-like pain, and liver enzyme elevation. Larotrectinib and entrectinib also produce robust and durable responses in NTRK fusion-positive thyroid cancer that is refractory to radioactive iodine. Second-generation TRK inhibitors that have been designed to overcome acquired resistance are under investigation.

Although comprehensive biomarker testing is recommended for all patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) before initiation of first-line treatment, tissue availability can limit testing. Genomic testing in liquid biopsies can be utilized to overcome the inherent limitations of tissue sampling and identify the most appropriate biomarker-informed treatment option for patients. The Blood First Assay Screening Trial is a global, open-label, multicohort trial that evaluates the efficacy and safety of multiple therapies in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC and targetable alterations identified by liquid biopsy. We present data from Cohort D (ROS1-positive). Patients ≥18 years of age with stage IIIB/IV, ROS1-positive NSCLC detected by liquid biopsies received entrectinib 600 mg daily. At data cutoff (November 2021), 55 patients were enrolled and 54 had measurable disease. Cohort D met its primary endpoint: the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by investigator was 81.5%, which was consistent with the ORR from the integrated analysis of entrectinib (investigator-assessed ORR, 73.4%; data cutoff May 2019, ≥12 months of follow-up). The safety profile of entrectinib was consistent with previous reports. These results demonstrate consistency with those from the integrated analysis of entrectinib in patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC identified by tissue-based testing, and support the clinical value of liquid biopsies to inform clinical decision-making. The integration of liquid biopsies into clinical practice provides patients with a less invasive diagnostic method than tissue-based testing and has faster turnaround times that may expedite the reaching of clinical decisions in the advanced/metastatic NSCLC setting. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03178552 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of patients with RA., Methods: The databases CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, CBM, and PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), all from the time of database creation to April 2024. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (using Review Manager-5.3 software) were independently performed by at least two authors. The network meta-analysis was conducted using R 4.1.3 software. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022370444., Results: Thirty-three RCTs included 15,961 patients The experimental groups involved six JAK inhibitors (filgotinib, tofacitinib, decernotinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and peficitinib) and 12 interventions (different doses of the six JAK inhibitors), and the control group involved adalimumab (ADA) and placebo. Compared with placebo, all JAK inhibitors showed a significant increase in efficacy measures (ACR20/50/70). Compared with ADA, only tofacitinib, low-dose decernotinib, and high-dose peficitinib showed a significant increase in ACR20/50/70. Decernotinib ranked first in the SUCRA ranking of ACR20/50/70. In terms of safety indicators, only those differences between low-dose filgotinib and high-dose upadacitinib, low-dose tofacitinib and high-dose upadacitinib were statistically significant. Low-dose filgotinib ranked first in the SUCRA ranking with adverse events as safety indicators. Only the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib ranked higher among different SUCRA rankings., Conclusion: Six JAK inhibitors have better efficacy than placebo. The superior efficacy of decernotinib and safety of low-dose filgotinib can be found in the SUCRA. However, there are no significant differences in safety between the different JAK inhibitors. Head-to-head trials, directly comparing one against each other, are required to provide more certain evidence., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Qu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Tecovirimat is the first-line antiviral treatment recommended for severe mpox or for persons with mpox who are at risk for severe disease; tecovirimat is available in the United States under an expanded access investigational new drug (IND) protocol. During the 2022-2023 mpox outbreak, local U.S. health jurisdictions facilitated access to tecovirimat. In June 2022, Los Angeles County (LAC) rapidly developed strategies for tecovirimat distribution using existing medical countermeasure distribution networks established by the Public Health Emergency Preparedness Program and the Hospital Preparedness Program, creating a hub and spoke distribution network consisting of 44 hub facilities serving 456 satellite sites across LAC. IND patient intake forms were analyzed to describe mpox patients treated with tecovirimat. Tecovirimat treatment data were matched with case surveillance data to calculate time from specimen collection to patients receiving tecovirimat. Among 2,281 patients with mpox in LAC, 735 (32%) received tecovirimat during June 2022-January 2023. Among treated patients, approximately two thirds (508; 69%) received treatment through community clinics and pharmacies. The median interval from specimen collection to treatment was 2 days (IQR = 0-5 days). Local data collection and analysis helped to minimize gaps in treatment access and facilitated network performance monitoring. During public health emergencies, medical countermeasures can be rapidly deployed across a large jurisdiction using existing distribution networks, including clinics and pharmacies., Competing Interests: All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Luminal androgen receptor (LAR)-enriched triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a distinct subtype. The efficacy of AR inhibitors and the relevant biomarkers in neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) are yet to be determined. We tested the combination of the AR inhibitor enzalutamide (120 mg daily by mouth) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 weekly intravenously) (ZT) for 12 weeks as NAT for LAR-enriched TNBC. Eligibility criteria included a percentage of cells expressing nuclear AR by immunohistochemistry (iAR) of at least 10% and a reduction in sonographic volume of less than 70% after four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Ten achieved a pathologic complete response or residual cancer burden-I. ZT was safe, with no unexpected side effects. An iAR of at least 70% had a positive predictive value of 0.92 and a negative predictive value of 0.97 in predicting LAR-enriched TNBC according to RNA-based assays. Our data support future trials of AR blockade in early-stage LAR-enriched TNBC., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests B.L. served a consultancy/advisory role for Celcuity, Natera, Daichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca; received honoraria from Puma Biotechnology, Novartis, and Pfizer; received grant/research funding from Genentech, Takeda, Merck, Celcuity, Eli Lilly, Puma Biotechnology, and Calithera Therapeutics; and received funding from NCI, DOD, CPRIT, Hope Foundation, and Adopt-A-Scientist. C.Y. has received research funding (to the institution) from Genentech, Gilead, BostonGene, Sanofi, Amgen, Pfizer, Astellas, and Novartis and has served on advisory boards for Gilead. W.F.S. is a co-inventor of US patent no. 11,459,617 “Targeted measure of transcriptional activity related to hormone receptors” issued on 10/4/2022 (applicant proprietor: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, licensed to Delphi Diagnostics, Inc.) and has co-founder equity from Delphi Diagnostics, Inc. A.M.T. is related by marriage to an employee of Eli Lilly. D.T. has received research support (to the institution) from Novartis, Pfizer, and Polyphor and has served as a consultant to AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Oncopep, Pfizer, Novartis, AMBRX, Personalis, Sermonix, Stemline-Menarini, and Puma Biotechnology. S.L.M. is currently employed by Eli Lilly (previously employed by MD Anderson at the time the study was conducted). J.K.L. has received grant or research support from Novartis, Medivation/Pfizer, Genentech, GSK, EMDSerono, AstraZeneca, Medimmune, Zenith, and Jounce; participated in Speaker’s Bureau for MedLearning, Physician’s Education Resource, Prime Oncology, Medscape, and Clinical Care Options; received honoraria from UpToDate; and served on advisory committees or review panels for AstraZeneca, Ayala, Pfizer (all uncompensated), NCCN, ASCO, NIH, PDQ, the SITC Breast Committee, and the SWOG Breast Committee., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: The efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab and acalabrutinib monotherapy vs zanubrutinib in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma without del(17p) were compared using an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Individual patient-level data from ELEVATE-TN (acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab, n = 162; acalabrutinib monotherapy, n = 163) were weighted to match published aggregate baseline data from SEQUOIA cohort 1, which excluded patients with del(17p) (zanubrutinib, n = 241), using variables that were prognostic/predictive of investigator-assessed progression-free survival (INV-PFS) in an exploratory Cox regression analysis of ELEVATE-TN. After matching, INV-PFS was longer with acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.74) and comparable with acalabrutinib monotherapy (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.53-1.56) vs zanubrutinib. Acalabrutinib monotherapy had significantly lower odds of any grade hypertension vs zanubrutinib (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.99), whereas acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab had significantly higher odds of neutropenia (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.33-3.60) and arthralgia (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.37-3.96) vs zanubrutinib. No other significant differences in safety were observed. In summary, acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab had longer INV-PFS with increased odds of neutropenia and arthralgia than zanubrutinib, whereas acalabrutinib monotherapy had similar INV-PFS with lower odds of any grade hypertension. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02475681 and #NCT03336333., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)

Background: Pediatric-type diffuse high-grade glioma (pHGG) is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in children and can be subclassified into multiple entities. Fusion genes activating the MET receptor tyrosine kinase often occur in infant-type hemispheric glioma (IHG) but also in other pHGG and are associated with devastating morbidity and mortality., Methods: To identify new treatment options, we established and characterized two novel orthotopic mouse models harboring distinct MET fusions. These included an immunocompetent, murine allograft model and patient-derived orthotopic xenografts (PDOX) from a MET-fusion IHG patient who failed conventional therapy and targeted therapy with cabozantinib. With these models, we analyzed the efficacy and pharmacokinetic properties of three MET inhibitors, capmatinib, crizotinib and cabozantinib, alone or combined with radiotherapy., Results: Capmatinib showed superior brain pharmacokinetic properties and greater in vitro and in vivo efficacy than cabozantinib or crizotinib in both models. The PDOX models recapitulated the poor efficacy of cabozantinib experienced by the patient. In contrast, capmatinib extended survival and induced long-term progression-free survival when combined with radiotherapy in two complementary mouse models. Capmatinib treatment increased radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks and delayed their repair., Conclusions: We comprehensively investigated the combination of MET inhibition and radiotherapy as a novel treatment option for MET-driven pHGG. Our seminal preclinical data package includes pharmacokinetic characterization, recapitulation of clinical outcomes, coinciding results from multiple complementing in vivo studies, and insights into molecular mechanism underlying increased efficacy. Taken together, we demonstrate the groundbreaking efficacy of capmatinib and radiation as a highly promising concept for future clinical trials., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Cardiac arrhythmias remain a significant concern with Ibrutinib (IBR), a first-generation Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi). Acalabrutinib (ABR), a next-generation BTKi, is associated with reduced atrial arrhythmia events. However, the role of ABR in ventricular arrhythmia (VA) has not been adequately evaluated. Our study aimed to investigate VA vulnerability and ventricular electrophysiology following chronic ABR therapy in male Sprague-Dawley rats utilizing epicardial optical mapping for ventricular voltage and Ca 2+ dynamics and VA induction by electrical stimulation in ex-vivo perfused hearts. Ventricular tissues were snap-frozen for protein analysis for sarcoplasmic Ca 2+ and metabolic regulatory proteins. The results show that both ABR and IBR treatments increased VA vulnerability, with ABR showing higher VA regularity index (RI). IBR, but not ABR, is associated with the abbreviation of action potential duration (APD) and APD alternans. Both IBR and ABR increased diastolic Ca 2+ leak and Ca 2+ alternans, reduced conduction velocity (CV), and increased CV dispersion. Decreased SERCA2a expression and AMPK phosphorylation were observed with both treatments. Our results suggest that ABR treatment also increases the risk of VA by inducing proarrhythmic changes in Ca 2+ signaling and membrane electrophysiology, as seen with IBR. However, the different impacts of these two BTKi on ventricular electrophysiology may contribute to differences in VA vulnerability and distinct VA characteristics.

Introduction: A neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has shown dramatic efficacy against malignant tumors harboring an NTRK fusion gene. However, almost all tumors eventually acquire resistance to NTRK-TKIs., Method: To investigate the mechanism of resistance to NTRK-TKIs, we established cells resistant to three types of NTRK-TKIs (larotrectinib, entrectinib, and selitrectinib) using KM12 colon cancer cells with a TPM3-NTRK1 rearrangement., Result: Overexpression of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 2 (HMGCS2) was observed in three resistant cells (KM12-LR, KM12-ER, and KM12-SR) by microarray analysis. Lower expression of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP2) and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α (PPARα) was found in two cells (KM12-ER and KM12-SR) in which HMGCS2 was overexpressed compared to the parental KM12 and KM12-LR cells. In resistant cells, knockdown of HMGCS2 using small interfering RNA improved the sensitivity to NTRK-TKI. Further treatment with mevalonolactone after HMGCS2 knockdown reintroduced the NTRK-TKI resistance. In addition, simvastatin and silibinin had a synergistic effect with NTRK-TKIs in resistant cells, and delayed tolerance was observed after sustained exposure to clinical concentrations of NTRK-TKI and simvastatin in KM12 cells. In xenograft mouse models, combination treatment with entrectinib and simvastatin reduced resistant tumor growth compared with entrectinib alone., Conclusion: These results suggest that HMGCS2 overexpression induces resistance to NTRK-TKIs via the mevalonate pathway in colon cancer cells. Statin inhibition of the mevalonate pathway may be useful for overcoming this mechanistic resistance., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a heterogeneous disease with prognoses varying from months to years at time of castration-resistant diagnosis. Optimal first-line therapy for those with different prognoses is unknown., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of men in a national healthcare delivery system receiving first-line therapy for mCRPC (abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, or ketoconazole) from 2010 to 2017, with follow-up through 2019. Using commonly drawn prognostic labs at start of mCRPC therapy (hemoglobin, albumin, and alkaline phosphatase), we categorized men into favorable, intermediate, or poor prognostic groups depending on whether they had none, one to two, or all three laboratory values worse than designated laboratory cutoffs. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to examine prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression-free and overall survival (OS) according to prognostic group and first-line therapy, and multivariable cox regression to determine variables associated with survival outcomes., Results: Among 4135 patients, median PSA progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.6-7.3), and median OS 18.8 months (95% CI 18.0-19.6), ranging from 5.7 months (95% CI 4.8-7.0) in the poor prognosis group to 31.3 months (95% CI 29.7-32.9) in the favorable group. OS was similar regardless of initial treatment received for favorable and intermediate groups, but worse for those in the poor prognostic group who received ketoconazole (adjusted hazard ratio 2.07, 95% CI 1.2-3.6). PSA PFS was worse for those who received ketoconazole compared to abiraterone across all prognostic groups (favorable HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.34-2.31; intermediate HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.41-2.25; poor HR 8.01, 95% CI 2.93-21.9)., Conclusion: Commonly drawn labs at mCRPC treatment start may aid in predicting survival and response to therapies, potentially informing discussions with care teams. First-line treatment selection impacts disease progression for all men with mCRPC regardless of prognostic group, but impacted OS only for men with poor prognosis at treatment start., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Rett syndrome (RTT) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in MECP2, which encodes methyl-CpG-binding protein 2, a transcriptional regulator of many genes, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). BDNF levels are lower in multiple brain regions of Mecp2-deficient mice, and experimentally increasing BDNF levels improve atypical phenotypes in Mecp2 mutant mice. Due to the low blood-brain barrier permeability of BDNF itself, we tested the effects of LM22A-4, a brain-penetrant, small-molecule ligand of the BDNF receptor TrkB (encoded by Ntrk2), on dendritic spine density and form in hippocampal pyramidal neurons and on behavioral phenotypes in female Mecp2 heterozygous (HET) mice. A 4-week systemic treatment of Mecp2 HET mice with LM22A-4 restored spine volume in MeCP2-expressing neurons to wild-type (WT) levels, whereas spine volume in MeCP2-lacking neurons remained comparable to that in neurons from female WT mice. Female Mecp2 HET mice engaged in aggressive behaviors more than WT mice, the levels of which were reduced to WT levels by the 4-week LM22A-4 treatment. These data provide additional support to the potential usefulness of novel therapies not only for RTT but also to other BDNF-related disorders., Competing Interests: Competing interests F.M.L. is listed as an inventor on patents relating to LM22A-4, which are assigned to the University of North Carolina and the University of California, San Francisco, and is eligible for royalties distributed by the assigned universities. He has financial interest in and serves as a board member for PharmatrophiX, a company focused on the development of small-molecule ligands for neurotrophin receptors, which has licensed several of these patents. F.M.L. also serves as an advisor for Pfizer Ventures. The remaining authors declare no competing or financial interests., (© 2024. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.)

Capmatinib is a potent selective mesenchymal-epithelial transition inhibitor approved in 2020 for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. As real-world evidence is very limited, this study evaluated capmatinib-induced adverse events through data mining of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Four disproportionality analysis methods were employed to quantify the signals of capmatinib-related adverse events. The difference in capmatinib-associated adverse event signals was further investigated with respect to sex, age, weight, dose, onset time, continent, and concomitant drug. A total of 1518 reports and 4278 adverse events induced by capmatinib were identified. New significant adverse event signals emerged, such as dysphagia, dehydration, deafness, vocal cord paralysis, muscle disorder, and oesophageal stenosis. Notably, higher risk of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase increases were observed in females, especially when capmatinib was combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Compared with Europeans and Asians, Americans were more likely to experience peripheral swelling, especially in people > 65 years of age. Renal impairment and increased blood creatinine were more likely to occur with single doses above 400 mg and in Asians. This study improves the understanding of safety profile of capmatinib., (© 2024. The Author(s).)