Search

Despite an abundance of preclinical data, relatively little is known regarding the efficacy of DNA vaccination in humans. Here, we present results from a dose-escalation clinical trial of a dual expression plasmid encoding carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in 17 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. CEA was selected as a prototypic tumor-associated self-antigen, and the HBsAg cDNA was included as a positive control for immune response to the DNA vaccine without relying upon breaking tolerance to a self-antigen. Groups of 3 patients received escalating single i.m. doses of the DNA vaccine at 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mg. Subsequent groups of 3 patients received three repetitive 0.3- or 1.0-mg doses at 3-week intervals. A final group of 2 patients received three repetitive 2.0 mg doses at 3-week intervals. Toxicity was limited to transient grade 1 injection site tenderness, fatigue, and creatine kinase elevations, each affecting a minority of patients in a non-dose-related manner. Repetitive dosing of the DNA vaccine induced HBsAg antibodies in 6 of 8 patients, with protective antibody levels achieved in four of these patients. CEA-specific antibody responses were not observed, but 4 of 17 patients developed lymphoproliferative responses to CEA after vaccination. No objective clinical responses to the DNA vaccine were observed among this population of patients with widely metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Nevertheless, this pilot trial has provided encouraging human immune response data in support of this vaccine technology.

The principal objectives of this trial were twofold: (a) to examine the safety and relative efficacy of intradermal needle injection versus s.c. jet administration of a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-encoding recombinant vaccinia virus (rV-CEA) over a limited dose range and (b) to evaluate CEA-specific immune responses or antitumor effects induced by rV-CEA vaccination. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, depending upon the technique of vaccine administration. All 20 patients received two doses of 10(7) or 10(8) pfu of rV-CEA at a 4-week interval. Toxicity was limited to modest local inflammation at the inoculation site as well as low-grade fever and increased fatigue, each affecting fewer than 20% of the patients. No evidence of CEA-specific lymphoproliferation, interleukin 2 release, delayed-type hypersensitivity, or antibody response was observed. Thus, the efficacy comparison between the two administration techniques was based upon the induction of immune responses to the vaccinia virus vector. Both techniques induced vaccinia-specific lymphoproliferation, interleukin 2 release, and antibody responses of comparable magnitude and frequency as well as protected 80% of patients against pustule formation following vaccinia scarification. Thus, there is no compelling reason to recommend one administration technique over the other based upon toxicity or efficacy. We have selected s.c. jet injection for subsequent trials of rV-CEA based on the ability to accommodate larger injection volumes, enhanced standardization between clinicians, and avoidance of needles that could transmit the vaccine or blood-borne pathogens to health care workers. We recommend use of 10(8) pfu doses for subsequent trials of recombinant vaccinia virus vaccines based upon the favorable toxicity profile and more consistent local pustule formation indicative of an adequate inoculation of live virus. No objective clinical responses to the rV-CEA vaccine were observed among this population of patients with widely metastatic adenocarcinoma.

In preparation for a Phase I trial of DNA immunization against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in patients with colorectal carcinoma, we have produced a single plasmid DNA encoding CEA and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) under transcriptional regulatory control of two separate cytomegalovirus promoters within separate eukaryotic expression cassettes, designated pCEA/HBsAg. Hepatitis B surface antigen was included to provide an internal positive control for the efficacy of this immunization strategy without regard to the issue of breaking tolerance to a self-antigen. In the present work, we sought to examine the immunogenicity of this plasmid in a nonhuman primate model with close phylogenetic relationship to humans. Groups of pig-tailed macaques were immunized with pCEA/ HBsAg by i.m. injection or particle bombardment of the skin according to a dose and schedule thought to be optimal for the respective technique of DNA immunization. Both administration techniques produced humoral and lympho-proliferative responses of comparable magnitude. However, delayed type hypersensitivity to CEA and CEA-specific interleukin-2 release were observed only in the i.m. group, suggesting a qualitative difference in the character of the immune response elicited by the two techniques of DNA immunization. The antibody responses to CEA and HBsAg were surprisingly persistent in that all immunized animals maintained moderate antibody titers against both antigens for more than 15 months after the last boost. No toxicity was observed during 2 years of follow-up, including no measurable levels of anti-DNA antibody. This antitumor immunization strategy is presently being examined in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma using pCEA/HBsAg administered by i.m. injection.

We have constructed a DNA plasmid encoding the full length complementary DNA for human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) driven by the cytomegalovirus early promoter/enhancer (plasmid DNA encoding human CEA) and demonstrated that this plasmid can function as a polynucleotide vaccine. This polynucleotide vaccine induced humoral and/or cellular immune responses specific for human CEA in all 5 immunized mice. Lymphoblastic transformation data with the use of enriched T-cell populations detected the presence of CEA-specific memory T-cells in 3 of 5 mice. Lymphocytes from 2 of 5 mice had interleukin 2/interleukin 4 release in response to CEA. CEA specificity was confirmed by the absence of reactivity to a control antigen and lack of CEA reactivity among mice vaccinated with a control plasmid encoding chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. Four of 5 mice vaccinated with plasmid DNA encoding human CEA demonstrated anti-CEA antibody responses. This immune response compared favorably with a positive control group of mice immunized with vaccinia-CEA by a dose and schedule previously shown to induce immunoprotection and therapy against a human CEA expressing syngeneic murine colon carcinoma model. Studies are ongoing to establish the construct, dose, and schedule to elicit optimal CEA-specific immune response as well as immunoprotection and therapy against human CEA expressing syngeneic murine adenocarcinoma models.