Search

The role of two- or three-field nodal dissection in the surgical treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer in the minimally invasive era is still controversial. This review aims to clarify the extension of nodal dissection in esophageal and gastroesophageal junctional cancer. A basic evidence-based analysis was designed, and seven research questions were formulated and answered with a narrative review. Reports with little or no data, single cases, small series and review articles were not included. Three-field lymph node dissection improves staging accuracy, enhances locoregional disease control and might improve survival in the group of patients with cervical and upper mediastinal metastatic lymph nodal involvement from middle and proximal-third esophageal cancer.

Hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) surgery includes major hepatic resection and pancreatic surgery, both procedures are complex and have a potentially high complication rate. The presence of centers of excellence with a high patients volume has lowered the complication and increased the resection rate. Increased life expectancy and improved general health status have increased the number of elderly patients eligible for major surgery. Since old patients have more co-morbidities and decreased life expectancy, the benefit of these procedures need to be critically evaluated in this group. Analysis of the literature related to this argument demonstrated that pancreatoduodenectomy can be performed safely in selected elderly patients (70 years of age or older), with morbidity and mortality rates comparable those observed in younger patients. This aspect was also confirmed by cost analysis studies that reported similar data in both groups. Similar findings are also reported for major hepatic resection in elderly patients with either hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), Klatskin tumor or gallbladder carcinoma. More studies are needed regarding the subgroup of very elderly patients (80 years or older). Nevertheless, those elderly patients who will benefit from surgery must be adequatelly selected.

Gastrectomy for gastric cancer is still performed in Western countries with high morbidity and mortality. Post-operative complications are frequent, and effective diagnosis and treatment of complications is crucial to lower the mortality rates. In 2015, a project was launched by the EGCA with the aim of building an agreement on list and definitions of post-operative complications specific for gastrectomy. In 2018, the platform www.gastrodata.org was launched for collecting cases by utilizing this new complication list. In the present paper, the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer endorsed a collection of complicated cases in the period 2015–2019, with the aim of investigating the clinical pictures, diagnostic modalities, and treatment approaches, as well as outcome measures of patients experiencing almost one post-operative complication. Fifteen centers across Italy provided 386 cases with a total of 538 complications (mean 1.4 complication/patient). The most frequent complications were non-surgical infections (gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and urinary) and anastomotic leaks, accounting for 29.2% and 17.3% of complicated patients, with a median Clavien–Dindo score of II and IIIB, respectively. Overall mortality of this series was 12.4%, while mortality of patients with anastomotic leak was 25.4%. The clinical presentation with systemic septic signs, the timing of diagnosis, and the hospital volume were the most relevant factors influencing outcome.

Evidence against the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy are increasing and ERAS guidelines suggest the benefit of drain avoidance. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether this practice is still widespread. We conducted a survey among Italian surgeons through the Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group and the Polispecialistic Society of Young Surgeons, aiming to understand the current use of prophylactic drain. A 28-item questionnaire-based survey was developed to analyze the current practice and the individual opinion about the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy. Groups based on age, experience and unit volume were separately analyzed. Response of 104 surgeons from 73 surgical units were collected. A standardized ERAS protocol for gastrectomy was applied by 42% of the respondents. Most of the surgeons, regardless of age, experience, or unit volume, declared to routinely place one or more drain after gastrectomy. Only 2 (1.9%) and 7 surgeons (6.7%) belonging to high volume units, do not routinely place drains after total and subtotal gastrectomy, respectively. More than 60% of the participants remove the drain on postoperative day 4–6 after performing an assessment of the anastomosis integrity. Interestingly, less than half of the surgeons believe that drain is the main tool for leak management, and this percentage further drops among younger surgeons. On the other hand, drain’s role seems to be more defined for duodenal stump leak treatment, with almost 50% of the surgeons recognizing its importance. Routine use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy is still a widespread practice even if younger surgeons are more persuaded that it could not be advantageous.

Highlights • Colonic lipomatosis may present with acute abdominal complications. • Acute appendicitis is a rare manifestation of colonic lipomatosis. • Surgery is the preferred treatment approach for acute complications of colonic lipomatosis. • No patient or author details are included in the figures submitted with the abstract., Introduction Colonic lipomatosis is defined as a poorly circumscribed, non-capsulated fat accumulation in the submucosal layer of the colonic wall. Clinical presentation varies from asymptomatic to acute surgical complications. Presentation of case We report the case of a 79-year old male who arrived at the Emergency Department complaining of worsening abdominal pain, fever and nausea. A CT scan revealed a periappendicular abscess extended to the ileocecal valve and also the presence of diffuse intramural fatty tissue of the ascending colon. The patient underwent surgery and a right hemicolectomy was performed. The final histological exam confirmed the diagnosis of gangrenous appendicitis with diffuse abscessualization of the ileocecal valve and the presence of submucosal lipomatosis of the ICV extending to the ascending colon. Patient was discharged at 11th-POD. Discussion Acute appendicitis can represent a complication, although rare, of colonic lipomatosis. The underlying mechanism can be explained by the obstruction of the stool discharge from the appendix caused by the thickened colonic wall due to lipomatosis. Despite the lack of established guidelines on the management of colonic lipomatosis, surgery remains the preferred treatment in case of acute complications. Conclusion Acute appendicitis is a rare clinical manifestation of colonic lipomatosis. As in the case of other acute complications, such as intussesception, surgery remains the preferred therapeutic approach.

Hepatic artery aneurysm is an uncommon and potentially fatal form of vascular disease. We report the case of a 53-year-old man with an isolated, nontraumatic rupture of an aneurysm of a replaced left hepatic artery originating from the left gastric artery. This case is unusual because the ruptured aneurysm involved an hepatic artery with a rare vascular pattern.

Highlights • We need to optimize tissue sparing for the best abdominal wall reconstruction. • We need to obtain a oncological safe procedure. • Using US technology to identify tumor edge. • This kind of US guided surgery can improve abdominal wall surgical resection reducing tissue loss., Background Desmoid tumors (DTs) is a benign tumor with high tendency to infiltrative evolution and recurrence. Nowadays, in abdominal localization, the standard approach is surgery with R0 condition. The need to repair post-surgical wide wall defect requires conservative technique to decrease the incidence of incisional hernia and to obtain better quality of life (QoL). Methods We perform an abdominal wall desmoid resection using ultrasound guide. This technique ensures to spare a wide wall area and to obtain a multilayer reconstruction minimizing postoperative risk. This approach allows good oncological results and better managing abdominal wall post-resection defect. Results We use US guided surgery to get radical approach and wall tissue spare that allows us a multilayer reconstruction minimizing post-operative complications. No recurrences were observed in one year follow up period. Conclusion Our experience represents first step to consider ultrasound mediated technique usefull to optimize wall resection surgery and to minimize following complications.