Search

Objective: Virtual care (VC) is an accepted modality of care delivery, and shared decision‐making (SDM) benefits patients with rheumatologic and chronic conditions (RCCs). Unfortunately, research suggests reduced quality of SDM during VC. This study explores the benefits and shortcomings of SDM regarding RCCs during VC with suggestions for optimally using VC during SDM. Methods: Following Stiggelbout's framework for SDM, we conducted focus groups of patients with RCCs and providers to understand their experiences with SDM during VC, probing for facilitating and challenging factors. We conducted content analysis of the transcripts, defining themes, and inductively reasoned to identify relationships among themes. We summarized the facilitators, barriers, and opportunities for improving SDM during VC that participants proposed. Results: Virtual SDM shares several similarities with in‐person practice, as both draw upon trusting patient‐provider relationships, following the same general steps, and relying on effective communication. VC presents solutions for known barriers to in‐person SDM, expanding time for making decisions and access to care. Technology and virtual health systems introduce new barriers to SDM, and participants list opportunities for overcoming these concerns. Conclusion: VC is a tool that can enhance and even support superior SDM compared with in‐person visits when implemented successfully, a condition requiring the development of nuanced skills to correctly identify when and how to best use VC for SDM as well as technology and health care structures that integrate SDM into VC. Therefore, patients, providers, insurance carriers, and policy makers all contribute to the success of SDM among RCCs during VC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Telehealth is an essential facet of care delivery for patients with rheumatic diseases. The Association of American Medical College's (AAMC) telehealth competencies (TCs) define the skills required for delivering general telehealth care across the range of clinician experience. In this study, the American College of Rheumatology's (ACR) TCs working group aimed to adapt the AAMC TCs to rheumatology, outlining the skills acquisition unique to rheumatology with a focus on knowledge, skills, and behaviors expected of recent rheumatology fellowship graduates. Methods: Through a collaborative process, the working group adapted the AAMC TCs to the training structure and practice of rheumatology. The rheumatology TCs underwent peer review among recipients of the Clinician Scholar Educator Award and attendees at the ACR 2021 Convergence conference. Results: The rheumatology TCs define 24 essential skills required for synchronous telehealth care of patients with rheumatic diseases. The working group adapted the AAMC's 20 TCs organized within 6 domains, added 2 skills to the AAMC's domains of patient safety and appropriate use, and data collection and assessment, and created a novel domain of systems‐based requirements with 2 competencies. The rheumatology TCs define expected skill levels for recent rheumatology fellowship graduates and experienced rheumatology clinicians. Conclusion: The rheumatology TCs represent the first adaptation of the AAMC TCs to subspecialty care, expanding the scope to include rheumatology fellowship graduates and additional domains of rheumatology practice. These competencies can guide curricular innovations and measurements of proficiency in telehealth care delivery among rheumatology trainees and experienced clinicians, enhancing the care provided to patients with rheumatic diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Lupus presents earlier and more severely among patients with skin of color (SOC), and this population experiences worse outcomes. Providers rely on medical education materials when developing skills to care for patients, yet these resources historically underrepresent patients with SOC and marginalize vulnerable populations. In this study, we investigated if this publication bias extends to images depicting patients with lupus. Methods: We reviewed published images of patients with lupus from rheumatology, dermatology, and internal medicine textbooks and medical journals, SOC atlases, online image libraries, UpToDate, and Google Images. We selected materials published from 2014 to 2019 that were available through our university's online medical library. We used the search terms "lupus" and "lupus rash" to identify images. We rated the skin color in each image using the New Immigrant Survey Skin Color Scale and categorized them as light, medium, or dark. We compared the frequencies of published skin tones with chi‐square and odds ratio analyses. Results: We assessed the skin tone of 1,417 images. The significant majority (56.4%) of the images represented light skin (χ2 = 490.14, P < 0.001). After SOC atlases, journals were the most inclusive of images depicting dark skin tones. The specialty of dermatology was most inclusive of medium and darker skin tones. Conclusion: Published images of lupus underrepresent patients with SOC, which may limit providers' ability to deliver care to the patients who are at greatest risk for complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with skin of color (P-SOC) are disproportionately burdened by lupus and often have worse disease outcomes than white patients. This is partly because educational materials underrepresent P-SOC, thereby promoting unconscious bias and clinical deficiencies among practitioners. Purpose: We sought to measure providers' confidence in diagnosing the cutaneous manifestations of lupus (i.e., lupus-related rashes) in P-SOC and to assess which factors influenced their confidence. Research Design: We created and distributed a survey that gathered information about participants' personal characteristics, clinical specialty, training, and current practice as well as measuring their confidence assessing lupus-related rashes in various skin tones. Study Sample: Practitioners from the fields of rheumatology, dermatology, and internal medicine in the greater St. Louis area (Missouri, USA) participated in the survey. Analysis: We compared practitioners' mean confidence levels assessing lupus-related rashes in patients with fair skin and P-SOC with a linear mixed effects model and used univariate and multivariate linear regression models to determine if the aforementioned factors correlated with confidence. Results: Participants' mean confidence in diagnosing lupus-related rashes in P-SOC was significantly lower than assessing such findings in patients with fair skin (p =.009). Several factors correlated with confidence level at a univariate level; however, the multivariate model revealed experience as the only factor significantly associated with confidence (p =.001). Conclusions: Providers report significantly less confidence assessing lupus-related rashes in P-SOC than in patients with fair skin. Our analysis demonstrates that experience positively correlates with confidence and suggests that interventions which enhance practitioners' exposure to and experience with these rashes in P-SOC can improve clinical confidence as well as patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 22-year-old woman with a history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was admitted with progressive edema. Two years before hospitalization, a local rheumatologist diagnosed her with SLE based on a syndrome of oral ulcers, inflammatory arthritis, discoid lupus lesions, and Raynaud phenomenon. Serum analysis revealed high-titer anti-nuclear antibodies, the presence of anti-SSA, anti-SSB, anti-Smith, anti-RNP, anti-histone, and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, and low complement (C3 and C4) levels. Hydroxychloroquine and topical clobetasol ointment were started. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Underrepresentation of patients with non-white skin in rheumatology educational resources impairs practitioners' competence in caring for patients with skin of colour and reduces patients' confidence in the medical system. Medical publishers and educators should reconsider how to promote equal representation and care of patients with all skin types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]