Search

The majority of glioblastomas can be classified into molecular subgroups based on mutations in the TERT promoter (TERTp) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH). These molecular subgroups utilize distinct genetic mechanisms of telomere maintenance, either TERTp mutation leading to telomerase activation or ATRX-mutation leading to an alternative lengthening of telomeres phenotype (ALT). However, about 20% of glioblastomas lack alterations in TERTp and IDH. These tumors, designated TERTpWT-IDHWT glioblastomas, do not have well-established genetic biomarkers or defined mechanisms of telomere maintenance. Here we report the genetic landscape of TERTpWT-IDHWT glioblastoma and identify SMARCAL1 inactivating mutations as a novel genetic mechanism of ALT. Furthermore, we identify a novel mechanism of telomerase activation in glioblastomas that occurs via chromosomal rearrangements upstream of TERT. Collectively, our findings define novel molecular subgroups of glioblastoma, including a telomerase-positive subgroup driven by TERT-structural rearrangements (IDHWT-TERTSV), and an ALT-positive subgroup (IDHWT-ALT) with mutations in ATRX or SMARCAL1., Glioblastoma can be classified based on IDH and TERT promoter mutations, but ~20% of glioblastoma do not have these mutations (TERTpWT-IDHWT glioblastoma). Here, the authors present a genetic landscape of TERTpWT-IDHWT glioblastoma, identifying a telomerase-positive subgroup driven by TERT-structural rearrangements and an ALT-positive subgroup with mutations in ATRX or SMARCAL1.

Precise genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis are often hindered by incomplete penetrance of risk variance and complex patterns of inheritance. Here, we performed a clinical and genetic study of a five-generation Pakistani family with a history of multiple cases of childhood brain tumors. Six affected individuals died of brain tumors at very early ages and three were confirmed as having a homozygous mutation in exon 6 of the PMS2 gene (c.543delT). Fifteen members of the family were identified as heterozygous carriers of this mutation with a lack of cancer incidence. Both clinical manifestations and genetic test results of brain tumor patients in the family support the diagnosis of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) syndrome, a condition in which individuals carry homozygous germline mutations in mismatch repair machinery genes with an early onset of malignancies such as glioma. This information was used to guide prenatal diagnosis with genetic testing on chorionic villus samples for the family. This is the first report of prenatal genetic diagnosis of hereditary brain tumor.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and deadly primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Mutations in the TERT promoter (TERTp) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/2) can classify ~80% of GBMs into molecular subgroups with distinct clinical courses. These molecular subgroups utilize distinct genetic mechanisms of telomere maintenance, either TERTp mutation leading to telomerase activation or ATRX-mutation leading to an alternative lengthening of telomeres phenotype (ALT). However, approximately 20% of GBMs lack alterations in TERTp and IDH1/2. These tumors, designated TERTp(WT)-IDH(WT) or triple-negative glioblastomas (as they also lack 1p19q co-deletion) do not have well-established genetic biomarkers or defined mechanisms of telomere maintenance. Here we performed whole-exome, whole-genome, and RNA-sequencing on a cohort of triple-negative GBMs to define their genetic landscape. We discovered recurrent inactivating mutations in SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A-like 1 (SMARCAL1) in 21% (8/39) of triple-negative GBMs. Using telomere maintenance characterization assays, we show that SMARCAL1-mutant cases exhibited the ALT phenotype. Using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in GBM cell lines, we found that inducing loss of SMARCAL1 generates features of ALT. Rescue of expression of SMARCAL1 in SMARCAL1-null cell lines markedly suppressed ALT features and was dependent on the enzyme helicase activity. Furthermore, using break-apart FISH and whole genome sequencing, we identified recurrent rearrangements upstream of TERT in ~50% of triple-negative GBMs. These TERT-rearranged tumors exhibited elevated levels of TERT mRNA expression. This represents a novel mechanism of telomerase activation in GBMs lacking the well-known TERT promoter hotspot mutations. Finally, we identify recurrent BRAF V600E mutations in younger patients with GBM. Collectively, our findings define novel molecular subgroups of glioblastoma, including a telomerase-positive subgroup driven by TERT-structural rearrangements (IDH(WT)-TERT(SV), ~50%), and an ALT-positive subgroup (IDH(WT)-ALT, ~40%) with mutations in ATRX or SMARCAL1. We also establish SMARCAL1 inactivating

Background Several somatic mutation hotspots were recently identified in the telomerase reverse transcriptase ( TERT ) promoter region in human cancers. Large scale studies of these mutations in multiple tumour types are limited, in particular in Asian populations. This study aimed to: analyse TERT promoter mutations in multiple tumour types in a large Chinese patient cohort, investigate novel tumour types and assess the functional significance of the mutations. Methods TERT promoter mutation status was assessed by Sanger sequencing for 13 different tumour types and 799 tumour tissues from Chinese cancer patients. Thymic epithelial tumours, gastrointestinal leiomyoma, and gastric schwannoma were included, for which the TERT promoter has not been previously sequenced. Functional studies included TERT expression by reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), telomerase activity by the telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay and promoter activity by the luciferase reporter assay. Results TERT promoter mutations were highly frequent in glioblastoma (83.9%), urothelial carcinoma (64.5%), oligodendroglioma (70.0%), medulloblastoma (33.3%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (31.4%). C228T and C250T were the most common mutations. In urothelial carcinoma, several novel rare mutations were identified. TERT promoter mutations were absent in gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), thymic epithelial tumours, gastrointestinal leiomyoma, gastric schwannoma, cholangiocarcinoma, gastric and pancreatic cancer. TERT promoter mutations highly correlated with upregulated TERT mRNA expression and telomerase activity in adult gliomas. These mutations differentially enhanced the transcriptional activity of the TERT core promoter. Conclusions TERT promoter mutations are frequent in multiple tumour types and have similar distributions in Chinese cancer patients. The functional significance of these mutations reflect the importance to telomere maintenance and hence tumourigenesis, making them potential therapeutic targets.

Frequent mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) and the promoter of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) represent two significant discoveries in glioma genomics. Understanding the degree to which these two mutations co-occur or occur exclusively of one another in glioma subtypes presents a unique opportunity to guide glioma classification and prognosis. We analyzed the relationship between overall survival (OS) and the presence of IDH1/2 and TERT promoter mutations in a panel of 473 adult gliomas. We hypothesized and show that genetic signatures capable of distinguishing among several types of gliomas could be established providing clinically relevant information that can serve as an adjunct to histopathological diagnosis. We found that mutations in the TERT promoter occurred in 74.2% of glioblastomas (GBM), but occurred in a minority of Grade II-III astrocytomas (18.2%). In contrast, IDH1/2 mutations were observed in 78.4% of Grade II-III astrocytomas, but were uncommon in primary GBM. In oligodendrogliomas, TERT promoter and IDH1/2 mutations co-occurred in 79% of cases. Patients whose Grade III-IV gliomas exhibit TERT promoter mutations alone predominately have primary GBMs associated with poor median OS (11.5 months). Patients whose Grade III-IV gliomas exhibit IDH1/2 mutations alone predominately have astrocytic morphologies and exhibit a median OS of 57 months while patients whose tumors exhibit both TERT promoter and IDH1/2 mutations predominately exhibit oligodendroglial morphologies and exhibit median OS of 125 months. Analyzing gliomas based on their genetic signatures allows for the stratification of these patients into distinct cohorts, with unique prognosis and survival.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and deadly primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Mutations in the TERT promoter (TERTp) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/2) can classify ~80% of GBMs into molecular subgroups with distinct clinical courses. These molecular subgroups utilize distinct genetic mechanisms of telomere maintenance, either TERTp mutation leading to telomerase activation or ATRX-mutation leading to an alternative lengthening of telomeres phenotype (ALT). However, approximately 20% of GBMs lack alterations in TERTp and IDH1/2. These tumors, designated TERTp(WT)-IDH(WT) or triple-negative glioblastomas (as they also lack 1p19q co-deletion) do not have well-established genetic biomarkers or defined mechanisms of telomere maintenance. Here we performed whole-exome, whole-genome, and RNA-sequencing on a cohort of triple-negative GBMs to define their genetic landscape. We discovered recurrent inactivating mutations in SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A-like 1 (SMARCAL1) in 21% (8/39) of triple-negative GBMs. Using telomere maintenance characterization assays, we show that SMARCAL1-mutant cases exhibited the ALT phenotype. Using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in GBM cell lines, we found that inducing loss of SMARCAL1 generates features of ALT. Rescue of expression of SMARCAL1 in SMARCAL1-null cell lines markedly suppressed ALT features and was dependent on the enzyme helicase activity. Furthermore, using break-apart FISH and whole genome sequencing, we identified recurrent rearrangements upstream of TERT in ~50% of triple-negative GBMs. These TERT-rearranged tumors exhibited elevated levels of TERT mRNA expression. This represents a novel mechanism of telomerase activation in GBMs lacking the well-known TERT promoter hotspot mutations. Finally, we identify recurrent BRAF V600E mutations in younger patients with GBM. Collectively, our findings define novel molecular subgroups of glioblastoma, including a telomerase-positive subgroup driven by TERT-structural rearrangements (IDH(WT)-TERT(SV), ~50%), and an ALT-positive subgroup (IDH(WT)-ALT, ~40%) with mutations in ATRX or SMARCAL1. We also establish SMARCAL1 inactivating mutations as a novel genetic mechanism of ALT in cancer.

Glioblastoma is universally fatal because of its propensity for rapid recurrence due to highly migratory tumor cells. Unraveling the genomic complexity that underlies this migratory characteristic could provide therapeutic targets that would greatly complement current surgical therapy. Using multiple high-resolution genomic screening methods, we identified a single locus, adherens junctional associated protein 1 (AJAP1) on chromosome 1p36 that is lost or epigenetically silenced in many glioblastomas. We found AJAP1 expression absent or reduced in 86% and 100% of primary glioblastoma tumors and cell lines, respectively, and the loss of expression correlates with AJAP1 methylation. Restoration of AJAP1 gene expression by transfection or demethylation agents results in decreased tumor cell migration in glioblastoma cell lines. This work shows the significant loss of expression of AJAP1 in glioblastoma and provides evidence of its role in the highly migratory characteristic of these tumors. Mol Cancer Res; 10(2); 208–17. ©2012 AACR.

Received: June 10, 2010 , Accepted: July 29, 2010 , Published: August 8, 2010 // The glioblastoma genome displays remarkable chromosomal aberrations, which harbor critical glioblastoma-specific genes contributing to several oncogenetic pathways. To identify glioblastoma-targeted genes, we completed a multifaceted genome-wide analysis to characterize the most significant aberrations of DNA content occurring in glioblastomas. We performed copy number analysis of 111 glioblastomas by Digital Karyotyping and Illumina BeadChip assays and validated our findings using data from the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) glioblastoma project. From this study, we identified recurrent focal copy number alterations in 1p36.23 and 4p16.3. Expression analyses of genes located in the two regions revealed genes which are dysregulated in glioblastomas. Specifically, we identify EGFR negative regulator, ERRFI1, within the minimal region of deletion in 1p36.23. In glioblastoma cells with a focal deletion of the ERRFI1 locus, restoration of ERRFI1 expression slowed cell migration. Furthermore, we demonstrate that TACC3, an Aurora-A kinase substrate, on 4p16.3, displays gain of copy number, is overexpressed in a glioma-grade-specific pattern, and correlates with Aurora kinase overexpression in glioblastomas. Our multifaceted genomic evaluation of glioblastoma establishes ERRFI1 as a potential candidate tumor suppressor gene and TACC3 as a potential oncogene, and provides insight on targets for oncogenic pathway-based therapy.

Glioblastoma multiforme is the most prevalent type of adult brain tumor and one of the deadliest tumors known to mankind. The genetic understanding of glioblastoma multiforme is, however, limited, and the molecular mechanisms that facilitate glioblastoma multiforme cell survival and growth within the tumor microenvironment are largely unknown. We applied digital karyotyping and single nucleotide polymorphism arrays to screen for copy-number changes in glioblastoma multiforme samples and found that the most frequently amplified region is at chromosome 7p11.2. The high resolution of digital karyotyping and single nucleotide polymorphism arrays permits the precise delineation of amplicon boundaries and has enabled identification of the minimal region of amplification at chromosome 7p11.2, which contains two genes, EGFR and SEC61γ. SEC61γ encodes a subunit of a heterotrimeric protein channel located in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). In addition to its high frequency of gene amplification in glioblastoma multiforme, SEC61γ is also remarkably overexpressed in 77% of glioblastoma multiforme but not in lower-grade gliomas. The small interfering RNA–mediated knockdown of SEC61γ expression in tumor cells led to growth suppression and apoptosis. Furthermore, we showed that pharmacologic ER stress agents induce SEC61γ expression in glioblastoma multiforme cells. Together, these results indicate that aberrant expression of SEC61γ serves significant roles in glioblastoma multiforme cell survival likely via a mechanism that is involved in the cytoprotective ER stress–adaptive response to the tumor microenvironment. [Cancer Res 2009;69(23):9105–11]

The Kolmogorov-Arnold stochasticity parameter technique is applied for the first time to the study of cancer genome sequencing, to reveal mutations. Using data generated by next generation sequencing technologies, we have analyzed the exome sequences of brain tumor patients with matched tumor and normal blood. We show that mutations contained in sequencing data can be revealed using this technique thus providing a new methodology for determining subsequences of given length containing mutations i.e. its value differs from those of subsequences without mutations. A potential application for this technique involves simplifying the procedure of finding segments with mutations, speeding up genomic research, and accelerating its implementation in clinical diagnostic. Moreover, the prediction of a mutation associated to a family of frequent mutations in numerous types of cancers based purely on the value of the Kolmogorov function, indicates that this applied marker may recognize genomic sequences that are in extremely low abundance and can be used in revealing new types of mutations., To appear in Royal Society Open Science, 12 pages, 2 figures

Anaplastic astrocytoma WHO grade III (A3) is a lethal brain tumor that often occurs in middle aged patients. Clinically, it is challenging to distinguish A3 from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) WHO grade IV. To reveal the genetic landscape of this tumor type, we sequenced the exome of a cohort of A3s (n=16). For comparison and to illuminate the genomic landscape of other glioma subtypes, we also included in our study diffuse astrocytoma WHO grade II (A2, n=7), oligoastrocytoma WHO grade II (OA2, n=2), anaplastic oligoastrocytoma WHO grade III (OA3, n=4), and GBM (n=28). Exome sequencing of A3s identified frequent mutations in IDH1 (75%, 12/16), ATRX (63%, 10/16), and TP53 (82%, 13/16). In contrast, the majority of GBMs (75%, 21/28) did not contain IDH1 or ATRX mutations, and displayed a distinct spectrum of mutations. Finally, our study also identified novel genes that were not previously linked to this tumor type. In particular, we found mutations in Notch pathway genes (NOTCH1, NOTCH2, NOTCH4, NOTCH2NL), including a recurrent NOTCH1-A465Tmutation, in 31% (5/16) of A3s. This study suggests genetic signatures will be useful for the classification of gliomas.

Malignant cells, like all actively growing cells, must maintain their telomeres, but genetic mechanisms responsible for telomere maintenance in tumors have only recently been discovered. In particular, mutations of the telomere binding proteins alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked ( ATRX ) or death-domain associated protein ( DAXX ) have been shown to underlie a telomere maintenance mechanism not involving telomerase (alternative lengthening of telomeres), and point mutations in the promoter of the telomerase reverse transcriptase ( TERT ) gene increase telomerase expression and have been shown to occur in melanomas and a small number of other tumors. To further define the tumor types in which this latter mechanism plays a role, we surveyed 1,230 tumors of 60 different types. We found that tumors could be divided into types with low (TERT promoter mutations. The nine TERT-high tumor types almost always originated in tissues with relatively low rates of self renewal, including melanomas, liposarcomas, hepatocellular carcinomas, urothelial carcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas of the tongue, medulloblastomas, and subtypes of gliomas (including 83% of primary glioblastoma, the most common brain tumor type). TERT and ATRX mutations were mutually exclusive, suggesting that these two genetic mechanisms confer equivalent selective growth advantages. In addition to their implications for understanding the relationship between telomeres and tumorigenesis, TERT mutations provide a biomarker that may be useful for the early detection of urinary tract and liver tumors and aid in the classification and prognostication of brain tumors.

Mutations in the critical chromatin modifier ATRX and mutations in CIC and FUBP1, which are potent regulators of cell growth, have been discovered in specific subtypes of gliomas, the most common type of primary malignant brain tumors. However, the frequency of these mutations in many subtypes of gliomas, and their association with clinical features of the patients, is poorly understood. Here we analyzed these loci in 363 brain tumors. ATRX is frequently mutated in grade II-III astrocytomas (71%), oligoastrocytomas (68%), and secondary glioblastomas (57%), and ATRX mutations are associated with IDH1 mutations and with an alternative lengthening of telomeres phenotype. CIC and FUBP1 mutations occurred frequently in oligodendrogliomas (46% and 24%, respectively) but rarely in astrocytomas or oligoastrocytomas ( more than 10%). This analysis allowed us to define two highly recurrent genetic signatures in gliomas: IDH1/ATRX (I-A) and IDH1/CIC/FUBP1 (I-CF). Patients with I-CF gliomas had a significantly longer median overall survival (96 months) than patients with I-A gliomas (51 months) and patients with gliomas that did not harbor either signature (13 months). The genetic signatures distinguished clinically distinct groups of oligoastrocytoma patients, which usually present a diagnostic challenge, and were associated with differences in clinical outcome even among individual tumor types. In addition to providing new clues about the genetic alterations underlying gliomas, the results have immediate clinical implications, providing a tripartite genetic signature that can serve as a useful adjunct to conventional glioma classification that may aid in prognosis, treatment selection, and therapeutic trial design.

BACKGROUND: Malignant cells must maintain their telomeres, but genetic mechanisms responsible for telomere maintenance in tumors have only recently been discovered. In particular, mutations of the telomere binding proteins alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) or death-domain associated protein (DAXX) have been shown to underlie a telomere maintenance mechanism not involving telomerase (alternative lengthening of telomeres), and point mutations in the promoter of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene increase telomerase expression and have been shown to occur in melanomas. METHODS: To further define the tumor types in which TERT plays a role, we surveyed 1,230 tumors of 60 different types. We also analyzed the relationship between median overall survival (OS) of patients with IDH1/2 and TERT promoter mutations in a panel of 473 adult gliomas with the hypothesis that genetic signatures capable of distinguishing among several types of gliomas could be established providing clinically relevant information that can serve as an adjunct to histopathological diagnosis. RESULTS: We found that tumors could be divided into types with low and high frequencies of TERT promoter mutations. The nine TERT-high tumor types almost always originated in tissues with relatively low rates of self renewal, including melanomas, liposarcomas, hepatocellular carcinomas, urothelial carcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas of the tongue, medulloblastomas, and subtypes of gliomas. TERT and ATRX mutations were mutually exclusive, suggesting that these two genetic mechanisms confer equivalent selective growth advantages. We found that mutations in the TERT promoter occurred in 74.2% of glioblastomas (GBM), but occurred in a minority of Grade II-III astrocytomas (18.2%). In contrast, IDH1/2 mutations were observed in 78.4% of Grade II-III astrocytomas, but were uncommon in primary GBM. In oligodendrogliomas, TERT promoter and IDH1/2 mutations co-occurred in 79% of cases. Patients whose Grade III-IV gliomas exhibit TERT promoter mutations alone predominately have primary GBMs associated with poor median OS rates (11.5 months). Patients whose gliomas exhibit IDH1/2 mutations alone predominately have astrocytic morphologies and exhibit a median OS of 57 months while patients whose tumors exhibit both TERT promoter and IDH1/2 mutations predominately exhibit oligodendroglial morphologies and exhibit median OS of 125 months. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to their implications for understanding the relationship between telomeres and tumorigenesis, TERT mutations provide a biomarker that may aid in the classification and prognostication of brain tumors. SECONDARY CATEGORY: Tumor Biology.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the deadliest tumors afflicting humans, and the mechanisms of its onset and progression remain largely undefined. Our attempts to elucidate its molecular pathogenesis through DNA copy-number analysis by genome-wide digital karyotyping and single nucleotide polymorphism arrays identified a dramatic focal amplification on chromosome 1q32 in 4 of 57 GBM tumors. Quantitative real-time PCR measurements revealed that HDMX is the most commonly amplified and overexpressed gene in the 1q32 locus. Further genetic screening of 284 low- and high-grade gliomas revealed that HDMX amplifications occur solely in pediatric and adult GBMs and that they are mutually exclusive of TP53 mutations and MDM2 amplifications. Here, we demonstrate that HDMX regulates p53 to promote GBM growth and attenuates tumor response to chemotherapy. In GBM cells, HDMX overexpression inhibits p53-mediated transcriptional activation of p21, releases cells from G0 to G1 phase, and enhances cellular proliferation. HDMX overexpression does not affect the expression of PUMA and BAX proapoptotic genes. While in GBM cells treated with the chemotherapeutic agent 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU), HDMX appears to stabilize p53 and promote phosphorylation of the DNA double-stranded break repair protein H2AX, up-regulate the DNA repair gene VPX, stimulate DNA repair, and confer resistance to BCNU. In summary, HDMX exhibits bona fide oncogenic properties and offers a promising molecular target for GBM therapeutic intervention.

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Network recently catalogued recurrent genomic abnormalities in glioblastoma (GBM). This genomic profiling lead to the molecular classification of GBMs into four subtypes: Proneural, Neural, Classical and Mesenchymal. The importance of identifying these subtypes helps researchers and clinicians to better understand GBMs with the potential to personalize treatment options and explore different therapeutic approaches that each subtype may require. In addition, the TCGA identified possible mechanisms that can cause some GBM tumors to become resistant to therapy, including the standard of care alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ). For this project, we established xenografts using patient derived tissue and passaged these xenografts until reliable growth characteristics were obtained. Established GBM xenografts were classified into TCGA-defined subtypes first by obtaining global gene expression data using the GeneChip Human Genome U133A 2.0 array from Affymetrix. Microarray data was then quantile normalized and probes were summarized as gene expression levels using RMA. Then data was log2 transformed and genes median centered. Xenografts were subsequently classified into one of four previously defined subtypes as described using Classification to the Nearest Centroid (ClaNC) with the TCGA GBM data as the training dataset. Using established xenografts from each subtype, a panel of standard of care treatment agents (including TMZ) was assessed by delay in tumor growth and by tumor regression. Statistical analysis was performed using a SAS statistical analysis program, the Wilcoxon rank order test for growth delay, and Fisher's exact test for tumor regression. Data regarding each xenografts BRAF, EGFR, EGFRvIII, IDH1, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTEN, RB1, TERT and TP53 status is reported within. The identification of these valid xenograft models represents an important contribution toward the ability of studying GBM subtypes, in particular for modeling and predicting therapeutic response. Citation Format: Stephen T. Keir, B Ahmed Rasheed, Katherine A. Hoadley, Martin A. Roskoski, Danuta Gasinski, Patrick J. Killela, Hai Yan, Madan M. Kwatra, Henry S. Friedman, Darell D. Bigner. Establishment, identification and treatment data of TCGA glioblatoma xenograft subtypes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 838. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-838

The glioblastoma (GBM) genome displays remarkable chromosomal aberrations, which harbor critical GBM specific genes contributing to several oncogenetic pathways. However, deciphering further driver genomic changes from passenger gene alterations remains a daunting challenge. In attempt to identify novel GBM genes, we carried out a multifaceted genome-wide analysis to characterize the most significant aberrations of DNA content occurring in GBM patients. First, we performed copy number analysis using Digital Karyotyping (DK) and Illumina BeadChip technologies and identify genomic loci which consistently present as focal copy number alterations. Next, we overlaid copy number altered loci with the somatic mutation data from our genome-wide coding sequencing analysis. Upon expression analyses of these genes, we identify several previously unrecognized genes which are dysregulated in GBM. Most significantly, we identify grade-specific activation of set of genes potentially involved in chromosomal instability of the GBM genome. Finally, we evaluated the contribution of microbial DNA to the GBM genome using an approach, called DK-MICROBE, which we developed to identify genomic DNA of bacteria and viruses in human disease tissues. Our multifaceted genomic evaluation of GBM establishes several candidate oncogenes, tumor suppressors and caretaker genes and provides insight on the molecular mechanisms and pathways to this deadly disease. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2142.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent and malignant human brain tumor. It is widely accepted that human cancer is a genetic disease caused by sequential accumulation of cancer gene mutations. Specifically, the gene or genes which initiate GBM formation has yet to be identified. Through collaboration with the Pakistani National Genetic Institute we have identified a consanguineous family presenting with a history of Pediatric GBMs to conduct comprehensive genomic analysis in hopes of identifying this “gatekeeper” gene. In this pedigree four children are deceased from GBM while an additional five infants have died within 4 days of birth without diagnosis. GBM has been the only diagnosed cancer in this family, indicating the existence of a GBM-specific germline mutation as a causative agent for the GBM clinical phenotype. Comprehensive genomic analysis has been conducted to elucidate a genetic aberration which is inherited and can be attributed to the GBM presenting clinical phenotype. We have collected blood and tumor DNAs for this family and performed sequencing on numerous genes including TP53, APC, IDH1, IDH2, PMS2, MLH1, MSH2, and, MSH6. Sequencing has successfully identified a germline frame shift mutation (p.Y181X) in PMS2. All affected patients have a homozygous mutation while their parents are both heterozygous carriers, suggesting the homozygous inheritance of this mutation is a causative agent for the GBM clinical phenotype. Our study suggests that the PMS2 inherited homozygous mutation could be a critical event in GBM formation. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1846.