Search

Introduction Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are a significant cause of death in patients with cancer. The incidence of VTE is not well characterized in early phase clinical trials of novel antineoplastic agents, or in hepatic dysfunction studies designed for patients with varying degrees of liver test abnormalities. We compared the incidences of VTE in phase 1 clinical trials (P1CTs) and hepatic dysfunction trials (HDCTs) sponsored by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the United States. Materials & methods We reviewed individual patient records of 1841 subjects for symptomatic VTE diagnosed while on study: 1328 subjects on 42 P1CTs, and 513 subjects on 9 HDCTs. The NCI's Organ Dysfunction Working Group definitions were used to categorize patients. The incidences of VTEs between patients were compared by the Chi square test. Confounders were evaluated with the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel method. Results & conclusions There were 43 VTEs identified among all subjects (2.3%). There were significantly more VTE observed in the subjects on P1CTs (n = 38, 2.9%) than in the subjects on HDCTs (n = 5, 1.0%; RR 0.341, 95% 0.13–0.86, p = 0.015). For patients on HDCTs, those with severe dysfunction had a high incidence of VTE (RR 10.5 (1.12–93.6), p = 0.021) that remained significant in a multivariate model. VTEs were observed less frequently in patients who were enrolled in HDCT than those who were enrolled in P1CT; however, patients with severe hepatic dysfunction were more likely to experience VTE. Severe liver test abnormalities may not be protective against VTE in patients with malignancies receiving chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

RET fusions are present in 1%-2% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pralsetinib, a highly potent, oral, central nervous system-penetrant, selective RET inhibitor, previously demonstrated clinical activity in patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC in the phase I/II ARROW study, including among treatment-naive patients. We report an updated analysis from the ARROW study. ARROW is a multi-cohort, open-label, phase I/II study. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 (later 0-1). Patients initiated pralsetinib at the recommended phase II dose of 400 mg once daily until disease progression, intolerance, consent withdrawal, or investigator's decision. The co-primary endpoints (phase II) were overall response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review and safety. Between 17 March 2017 and 6 November 2020 (data cut-off), 281 patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC were enrolled. The ORR was 72% [54/75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 60% to 82%] for treatment-naive patients and 59% (80/136; 95% CI 50% to 67%) for patients with prior platinum-based chemotherapy (enrolment cut-off for efficacy analysis: 22 May 2020); median duration of response was not reached for treatment-naive patients and 22.3 months for prior platinum-based chemotherapy patients. Tumour shrinkage was observed in all treatment-naive patients and in 97% of patients with prior platinum-based chemotherapy; median progression-free survival was 13.0 and 16.5 months, respectively. In patients with measurable intracranial metastases, the intracranial response rate was 70% (7/10; 95% CI 35% to 93%); all had received prior systemic treatment. In treatment-naive patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC who initiated pralsetinib by the data cut-off (n = 116), the most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (18%), hypertension (10%), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (9%), and lymphopenia (9%). Overall, 7% (20/281) discontinued due to TRAEs. Pralsetinib treatment produced robust efficacy and was generally well tolerated in treatment-naive patients with advanced RET fusion–positive NSCLC. Results from the confirmatory phase III AcceleRET Lung study (NCT04222972) of pralsetinib versus standard of care in the first-line setting are pending. • Pralsetinib produced an ORR of 72% in treatment-naive patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC. • Pralsetinib was generally well tolerated and there were no new safety signals. • The confirmatory phase III AcceleRET Lung study (NCT04222972) of pralsetinib versus standard of care in the first-line setting is ongoing [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the phase III CheckMate 743 study (NCT02899299), first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We report updated data with 3-year minimum follow-up. Adults with previously untreated, histologically confirmed, unresectable MPM and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤1 were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) for up to 2 years, or six cycles of platinum plus pemetrexed chemotherapy. This report includes updated efficacy and safety outcomes, exploratory biomarker analyses including four-gene inflammatory expression signature score, and a post hoc efficacy analysis in patients who discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). With a median follow-up of 43.1 months, nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to prolong OS versus chemotherapy. Median OS was 18.1 versus 14.1 months [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 0.73 (0.61–0.87)], and 3-year OS rates were 23% versus 15%, respectively. Three-year progression-free survival rates were 14% versus 1%, and objective response rates were 40% versus 44%. At 3 years, 28% versus 0% of responders had an ongoing response. Improved survival benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy was observed across subgroups, including histology. A high score of the four-gene inflammatory signature appeared to correlate with improved survival benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. No new safety signals were observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, despite patients being off therapy for 1 year. In patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab due to TRAEs, median OS was 25.4 months, and 34% of responders maintained their responses for ≥3 years after discontinuation. With 3 years' minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to provide long-term survival benefit over chemotherapy and a manageable safety profile, supporting the regimen as standard-of-care treatment for unresectable MPM, regardless of histology. • With a ≥3-year follow-up in CheckMate 743, nivolumab + ipilimumab continued to provide long-term OS benefit in first-line MPM. • Clinical benefits remained consistent across patient subgroups, including epithelioid versus non-epithelioid histology. • Discontinuing nivolumab + ipilimumab due to TRAEs did not negatively impact long-term benefit. • Nivolumab + ipilimumab continues to be an efficacious first-line treatment option for patients with unresectable MPM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Venous thromboembolism (Wickham et al., 2012 [1]) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with cancer; however, primary thromboprophylaxis is not routinely recommended. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) to measure the impact of primary VTE prevention and its effect on mortality among patients with lung cancer. Methods With assistance from a master librarian, we searched Ovid, Scopus, DARE, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM reviews-Cochrane database of systematic reviews, EBM reviews-ACP journal, and EBM Reviews-Databases for relevant studies following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included articles addressing the role of anticoagulation in patients with lung cancer for primary VTE prevention for outpatients. The clinical outcomes were VTE occurrence, all-cause mortality, major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. The results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and data were analyzed using R and R META package (Version 0.8–2, Author: Guido Schwarzer). Results Eleven studies with 5107 patients were included for the final analysis. We found 50% lower VTE occurrence in the prophylaxis group with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (OR: 0.50; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.38–0.66; I2: 0%) without an increased bleeding risk (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 0.78–5.25; I2: 71.1%). We found a mortality benefit when we grouped all VTE prevention modalities [LMWH, Warfarin, unfractionated heparin (UFH)] (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.58–0.96; I2: 18.4%), but no significant difference when LMWH (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.49–1.11; I2: 56.9%) and warfarin were analyzed individually (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.47–1.21; I2: 0%). We found higher odds of bleeding combining all treatment modalities (OR: 3.06; 95% CI: 1.64–5.72; I2: 64.4%) with the greatest occurrence in the warfarin group (OR: 5.42; 95% CI: 3.48–8.45; I2: 45.7%). Conclusion Primary VTE prophylaxis with LMWH reduces the occurrence of VTE among ambulatory patients with lung cancer, without apparent increase in bleeding risk. There is a measurable mortality benefit of anticoagulation strategies that remains elusive when the analysis is restricted to a single agent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable disease, yet it is one of the leading causes of death among patients with cancer. Improving risk stratification mechanisms will allow us to personalize thrombo-prophylaxis strategies. We sought to evaluate Collagen and Thrombin Activated Platelets (COAT-platelets) as well as protein C and factor VIII as biomarkers predictive of cancer-associated thrombosis in a prospective cohort of patients with cancer. Protein C was selected as a candidate based on bioinformatics prediction. Blood samples were collected before chemotherapy. All specimen processing was blinded to clinical data. Surveillance and adjudication of the main outcome of VTE was performed for up to 1 year. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to measure the association of biomarkers and incident events using SAS 9.2 for all statistical analysis. Death was modeled as a competing event. Among 241 patients followed for an average of 10.4 months, 15% died and 13% developed a VTE. COAT-platelets were not predictive of VTE. Low levels of pre-chemotherapy protein C (< 118%) (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1–5.5) and high baseline factor VIII (> 261% I) (HR 3.0; 95% CI 1.1–8.0) were predictive of VTE after adjusting for age, Khorana prediction risk, metastatic disease and D dimer. In addition, low protein C was predictive of overall mortality independent of age, metastatic disease and functional status (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.3–6.0). Addition of these biomarkers to cancer-VTE risk prediction models may add to risk stratification and patient selection to optimize thrombo-prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]