Search

BackgroundModern technologies, including smartphone apps, have the potential to assist people with cognitive impairment with activities of daily living, allowing them to maintain their independence and reduce carer burden. However, such tools have seen a slow rate of uptake in this population, and data on the acceptability of assistive technologies in this population are limited. ObjectiveThis pilot study included older adults with cognitive impairment and their carers, and explored the perceived needs for and acceptability of an app that was designed to be a simple assistive tool for activities of daily living. In particular, this study aimed to assess the acceptability of common app functions such as communication, reminder, navigation, and emergency tools in this population, and to compare patients’ and carers’ responses to them. MethodsA total of 24 German participants with mild cognitive impairment or dementia and their family carers separately completed two short questionnaires. The first questionnaire asked the participants with cognitive impairment and their carers to self-rate the patients’ cognitive impairment levels and affinity to technology. Following a demonstration of the app, participants rated the usability and acceptability of the app and its functions in a second questionnaire. ResultsParticipants rated themselves as much less cognitively impaired than their carers did (P=.01), and insight into the level of support they received was low. The majority of the participants (19/24, 79%) and their carers (20/24, 83%) had low affinity to technology, and even after the demonstration, 63% (15/24) of the participants had low interest in using the app. A breakdown of acceptability responses by app function revealed that participants were more amenable to the reminder function, the emergency feature, and a wearable form of the app. Features that centered around carers monitoring participants’ movements were reported to be less acceptable to participants. ConclusionsThis study highlights the importance of focusing on acceptability and the consumer’s perceptions in the development of assistive technology for older adults with cognitive impairment. Participants showed an aversion to functions they perceived as eroding their independence, while functions that more closely aligned with independence and autonomy were perceived as more acceptable.

Background: Dementia risk reduction is a public health priority and general practitioners (GPs) play a pivotal role in preventative healthcare. Therefore, risk assessment tools should be designed with GPs' preferences and perspectives in mind. Objective: The LEAD! GP project aimed to investigate Australian GPs' preferences and perspectives relating to design, use and implementation of a new risk assessment tool that simultaneously calculates risk for four outcomes— dementia, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarct, and stroke. Methods: A mixed methods study using semi-structured interviews of a diverse group of 30 Australian GPs was conducted. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically. Demographics and questions that elicited categorical answers were analyzed descriptively. Results: Overall, GPs felt that preventative healthcare was important with some finding it rewarding, and others finding it difficult. GPs currently use many risk assessment tools. GPs' perception of the usefulness and negatives/barriers of tools related to clinical practice applicability, patient engagement, and practical aspects. The largest barrier was lack of time. GPs responded positively to the concept of a four-in-one tool and preferred it to be relatively short, supported by practice nurses and some patient involvement, linked to education resources, available in different formats, and integrated into practice software. Conclusion: GPs recognize the importance of preventative healthcare and the potential benefit of a new tool that simultaneously predicts risk for those four outcomes. Findings provide important guidance to inform the final development and piloting of this tool with potential to improve efficiency and practical integration of preventative healthcare for dementia risk reduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: People experiencing cognitive concerns and symptoms of depression or anxiety are at risk for Alzheimer's disease and dementia. We know physical activity can benefit cognition but understanding how to best support engagement is an ongoing challenge. Evidence-based conceptual models of factors underpinning physical activity engagement in target populations can inform intervention tailoring to address this challenge. Objective: This study (part of a pragmatic physical activity implementation trial) aimed to develop a specified model of physical activity engagement in people experiencing depressive or anxiety symptoms and cognitive concerns, to enable optimized dementia risk reduction intervention tailoring. Methods: We employed a qualitative design, triangulating data from three sources: semi-structured individual interviews with people experiencing cognitive concerns and mild to moderate depressive or anxiety symptoms; review of published evidence; and the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation system of behavior, an existing behavioral science model. Findings were integrated to develop a contextualized model of mechanisms of action for optimizing engagement. Results: Twenty-one participants were interviewed, and 24 relevant papers included. Convergent and complementary themes extended understanding of intervention needs. Findings highlighted emotional regulation, capacities to enact intentions despite barriers, and confidence in existing skills as areas of population-specific need that have not previously been emphasized. The final model provides specificity, directionality, and linked approaches for intervention tailoring. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that people experiencing cognitive concerns and symptoms of depression or anxiety require different interventions to improve physical activity engagement. This novel model can enable more precise intervention tailoring, and, ultimately, benefits for a key at-risk population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Residents of care homes need access to outdoors. This may improve behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and quality of life in residents living with dementia. Barriers including lack of accessibility and increased falls risk, which may be mitigated using dementia-friendly design. This prospective cohort study followed a group of residents in the first 6 months after the opening of a new dementia-friendly garden. Method: Nineteen residents participated. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory – Nursing Home Version (NPI-NH) and psychotropic medication use were collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months. The facility's falls rate during this time and feedback from staff and residents' next of kin were collected. Results: Total NPI-NH scores decreased, though not significantly. Feedback was positive overall; the falls rate decreased. Usage of the garden was low. Conclusions: Despite its limitations, this pilot study adds to the literature about the importance of access to the outdoors for people who are experiencing BPSD. Staff remain concerned about falls risk despite the dementia-friendly design, and many residents do not access outdoors frequently. Further education may help to remove barriers to encouraging residents to access the outdoors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: General practitioners face many barriers to deprescribing psychotropic medications in people with dementia in nursing homes, including a lack of knowledge about their medication histories. This study explored the knowledge of family members about residents' medications and their willingness to support deprescribing. Methods: Sixty‐six family members of residents from seven residential aged care facilities participated in this cross‐sectional study. Participation involved nomination of recognised medications, rating their effectiveness and rating level of support for deprescribing. Results: Fifty‐five per cent of medications were recognised by family members; significantly fewer psychotropics were recognised than non‐psychotropic medications. Though rated as just as effective, support for deprescribing psychotropics was significantly higher. Most family members were agreeable to deprescribing with general practitioner support. Conclusions: Although there is a gap in family members' knowledge about psychotropic medications, overall they are supportive of deprescribing. Findings emphasise the need for psychoeducation among family members. Providing family members with a list of prescribed medications, specifying the type of and reason for prescription and side effects of each, is recommended to facilitate their advocacy for deprescribing on behalf of nursing home residents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Physical inactivity significantly contributes to chronic disease burden, including increasing dementia risk. Physical activity (PA) can benefit cognitive health for groups at high‐risk of dementia, such as people experiencing cognitive concerns (including mild cognitive impairment and subjective cognitive decline), and mental health symptoms. However, understanding how to best enable people with co‐occurring cognitive and mental health concerns to increase PA for dementia risk reduction (DRR) remains challenging for researchers, resulting in lower adherence in clinical trials and limiting the impact of implementation in clinical practice. The EXCEL PA implementation study incorporated design approaches from behavioral science that were novel to DRR, to improve intervention tailoring and engagement. We report findings from the first phase of EXCEL, which aimed to understand PA behavior change needs in this population and identify unique intervention tailoring requirements to enable more effective engagement. Method: The study used the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation (COM‐B) model of behavior change as an organizing framework. Middle‐aged and older people (aged 45 – 85 years) experiencing subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild‐moderate depression or anxiety were interviewed. Themes from semi‐structured interviews examining PA and DRR perspectives were triangulated with findings from published PA intervention trials to identify convergent and complementary themes. Integrated findings were mapped to the study framework to develop a specified, contextualized model of key factors influencing PA behavior change and matched intervention approaches. Result: Data from 21 interviews and 24 relevant papers were included. Identified areas requiring behavior change support in the target population that have not been emphasized in theory or previous interventions included: • Emotional regulation • Turning intentions into action despite distractions or barriers • Confidence in existing skills, including to overcome barriers and regulate emotion These aligned with and extended COM‐B and provided a model to guide the EXCEL intervention. Conclusion: This novel model used behavioral science methods to tailor an intervention for people experiencing cognitive concerns and depression or anxiety, supporting improved PA engagement and impact for an at‐risk population (see Ellis et al. AAIC‐23, submitted, for trial results). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Physical inactivity significantly increases dementia risk (DR). For middle‐aged and older adults with co‐occurring cognitive concerns/impairment and mental health symptoms, DR increases further. Clinical trials indicate lower adherence to PA interventions for dementia risk reduction in such high risk‐group, and interventions tailored to support unique behaviour change needs are required. In EXCEL Phase 1 we developed a model to understand Physical Activity (PA) behavior change needs in this population and identify tailoring requirements to enhance engagement (see Curran et al. AAIC‐23, submitted). Here we report findings of our trial of a pragmatic online intervention to support middle‐aged and older adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and mild‐moderate symptoms of depression, anxiety or stress to adopt and maintain PA. Method: An online individual 12‐week home‐based PA intervention. Participants aged 45‐80 years, experiencing both cognitive (SCD or MCI) and mild‐moderate mental health symptoms (measured by the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale ‐ DASS‐21) were prescribed individually tailored PA programs combining aerobic and strength PA; plus balance training as indicated, with fortnightly online coaching from researchers. Acceptability, feasibility, safety, and effectiveness (including pre‐post change in PA and mental health scores) were measured. Result: 55 participants were enrolled (46 females/9 males; mean age = 62.2 years). Retention was high (95%) and the intervention was well received; 98% finding it useful, 100% stating they would recommend to others. The intervention was safe, utilizing a system of email alerts/queries to the study medical team (44 alerts), PA team (35 queries/requests), individual exercise specialist (3 zoom sessions) and case conferences. Mental health improved across all DASS‐21 dimensions. Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) scores improved post‐intervention, with higher frequency of all moderate/high intensity exercise (from 8.1 to 12.4 times/week), more strength training frequency (0.8 to 2.5 times/week) and longer time spent strength training (25 to 65 mins/week). Balance activity (older adults only) frequency increased from 0.5 ‐ 4 times/week. Conclusion: This home‐based online intervention, using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation model of behavior change, successfully helped an at‐risk cohort adopt and maintain PA in line with Australian PA guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Depression is a common disorder among older people living in residential aged care facilities. Several trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of behavioural therapies in treating depressive symptoms in older adults living in the community and in residential aged care. Behavioural Activation is demonstrably effective even when delivered by non-specialists (staff without formal psychological training), although strategies for adapting its use in residential aged care facilities are yet to be explored. This study will determine whether training residential care staff in the use of a structured Behavioural Activation programme is more effective at decreasing depressive symptoms among older residents than internet-based training about depression recognition and management alone. Method and analysis The behavioural activation in nursing homes to treat depression (BAN-Dep) trial is a pragmatic two-arm parallel clustered randomised controlled trial. It will recruit 666 residents aged 60 or older from 100 residential aged care facilities, which will be randomly assigned to the Behavioural Activation or control intervention. Staff in both treatment groups will be encouraged to complete the Beyondblue Professional Education to Aged Care e-learning programme to improve their recognition of and ability to respond to depression in older adults. Selected staff from intervention facilities will undergo additional training to deliver an 8-module Behavioural Activation programme to residents with subthreshold symptoms of depression-they will receive ongoing Mental support from trained Behavioural Activation therapists. Outcome measures will be collected by blind research officer at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 is the primary outcome measure of the study. Ethics and dissemination The trial will comply with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki for Human Rights and is overseen by the University of Western Australia (reference RA/4/20/4234) and Melbourne Health (reference number HREC/18/MH/47) Ethics Committees. The results of this research project will be disseminated through publications and/or presentations in a variety of media to health professionals, academics, clinicians and the public. Only de-identified group data will be presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]