Search

This article examines the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy as a maintenance treatment after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) who cannot undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). The study presents a case series of seven patients who received CAR-T cells for relapsed/refractory Ph+ ALL and subsequently received TKI maintenance. The article discusses the patients' characteristics and outcomes, emphasizing the need for further research and data on this approach. The study suggests that TKI maintenance therapy after CAR-T may be beneficial, particularly in patients who achieve complete molecular remission (CMR) and have no evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD). The authors recommend larger prospective trials to confirm the effectiveness and safety of TKI maintenance therapy post-CAR-T, and to explore its potential application to other subtypes of ALL. [Extracted from the article]

Summary: Therapy‐related acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (tr‐ALL) is a disease entity attributed to previous exposure to chemotherapy and/or radiation for antecedent malignancy. There is observed female predominance for tr‐ALL, likely due to high prevalence and excellent curable rate for non‐metastatic breast cancer as well as the frequent use of carcinogenic agents as part of adjuvant therapy. Here, we reviewed 37 women with diagnosis of ALL following breast cancer treatment with focus on cytogenetic categorization. Philadelphia chromosome positivity (Ph+), KMT2A alterations and other cytogenetic change groups were observed in 32%, 22% and 46% of patients respectively. Median overall survival (OS) and relapse‐free survival (RFS) were 19.4 and 12.9 months, overall while both OS and RFS were superior in tr‐ALL with Ph+ disease compared to KMT2Ar and other cytogenetics respectively. Seventeen (45.9%) patients underwent consolidative allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in CR1 out of which 4 (24%) relapsed following transplant. Both OS and RFS were superior in the KMT2Ar cytogenetics group following alloHCT. Ph chromosome represents the largest genetic entity of tr‐ALL following breast cancer therapy, and it may be associated with superior survival outcomes while KMT2Ar may be associated with poorer outcomes that can perhaps be mitigated by alloHSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations remains a difficult and hard to treat entity. Gilteritinib is a potent oral FLT-3 inhibitor that improves overall survival in R/R AML, but studies are limited in combining gilteritinib with a hypomethylating agent and venetoclax treatment backbone (HMA-VEN-GILT). Here we report our experience with HMA-VEN-GILT for 22 R/R FLT3 AML patients. HMA-VEN-GILT yielded an ORR of 77.3% (17/22), CR 4.5% (1/22), CRi 13.6% (3/22), MLFS 59.1% (13/22). Median follow-up was 10.4 months with a relapse rate of 29.4% (5/17), median time to relapse of 69 days (range 35–298 days), 6-month overall survival of 84%, and median OS of 10.1 months. Additionally, 36.4% (8/22) of patients proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In conclusion, HMA-VEN-GILT for the treatment of R/R FLT3 AML is feasible and can be used as a bridge to allogeneic transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We conducted a retrospective analysis of WT1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant. Thirty-seven patients with WT1-mutated AML were identified. Primary induction failure (40%) and early relapse rate (18%) after idarubicin/cytarabine (7 + 3) chemotherapy were observed. All patients with induction failure subsequently achieved CR with additional chemotherapy. There was no significant difference between outcomes after myeloablative vs. reduced intensity (Fludarabine/Melphalan [Flu/Mel]) conditioning regimens. RFS but not OS was significantly better in patients who received FLAG-IDA prior to transplant and/or a fludarabine-containing conditioning. In an independent ex vivo study, WT1-mutated AML samples exhibited greater sensitivity to fludarabine (p = 0.026) and melphalan (p = 0.0005) than non-WT1-mutated AML samples while there was no difference between sensitivity to cytarabine. Our data favor using a fludarabine-based induction for AML with WT1 mutation instead of 7 + 3. Fludarabine conditioning regimens for alloHCT showed better RFS but not OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients living with HIV are now living longer due to increased access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and a decrease in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-defining cancer (ADC). However, increasing age and previous chemotherapy exposure for ADC (e.g., anthracyclines and topoisomerase inhibitors) are factors that may increase the risk of developing therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and highlight an unmet need. There are no established guidelines for the treatment of AML in patients with HIV and the literature is limited to treatment outcomes and experience. In addition, cladribine, a purine analog used in AML, has a package insert warning to avoid administration with concurrent agents that undergo phosphorylation, which include HIV ART backbones (e.g., nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTI]). Whether concurrent NRTI-based ART is deliverable with AML induction chemotherapy has not been reported previously. In our single-center experience of seven HIV-AML patients, all patients continued concurrent ART with induction chemotherapy. In 6 evaluable patients, three (50%) of patients went into complete remission (CR). Five (71.4%) patients were able to proceed to allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Median OS was 16.6 months, with patients who received HCT having longer median OS compared to those who were unable to proceed to HCT (49.6 months vs. 3.4 months). Interestingly, none of the patients who received AML regimens that included fludarabine were able to obtain a response. On the contrary, 4 patients who received AML regimens that utilized cytarabine given over a prolonged period of time (e.g., 7 + 3, liposomal daunorubicin/cytarabine) achieved a CR rate of 75%. Concurrent HIV ART and AML induction chemotherapy is deliverable, although much remains to be investigated on potential drug interactions between purine analog-based chemotherapy and HIV ART. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intensive treatment regimens for relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) generally include an anthracycline, cytarabine, with or without a purine analog. In patients who cannot tolerate an anthracycline due to comorbidities, one may consider using etoposide. Given the ongoing fludarabine shortage, it has prompted the switch to other purine analogs, such as cladribine, in combination with cytarabine and etoposide in patients who may be eligible for intensive chemotherapy but not able to tolerate an anthracycline due to comorbidities or cardiotoxicity risks. Here, we present 4 patients who received a cladribine, cytarabine, and etoposide (CCE) based regimen for R/R AML. There were no significant therapy-related adverse events, dose holds, or delays. Two out of 3 evaluable patients were successfully bridged to allogeneic transplant, and one is pending another cycle of chemotherapy as a bridge to transplant. The CCE regimen offers a potential option for patients with R/R AML in need of an anthracycline-free salvage regimen during a fludarabine shortage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In November 2020, the FDA issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 at high risk for disease progression. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 38 adult hematology patients who received mAbs from 11/2020 to 2/2021. Results: Thirty (79%) patients received bamlanivimab and 8 (21%) casirivimab-imdevimab. Four (11%) patients were hospitalized due to COVID-19, two (5%) progressed to severe disease and one patient (3%) died within 30 days from COVID-19 disease. Most patients (n = 34, 89%) ultimately tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, with 34% (n = 13) clearing the virus within 14 days after mAb infusion. The median time to clearance of viral shedding was 25.5 days (range: 7-138). After mAb infusion, most patients with hematological malignancies (HM) (n = 10/15; 67%) resumed therapy for underlying disease with a median delay of 21.5 days (range: 12-42). We observed a significant difference in hospitalization among patients who received a HCT versus non-HCT (0% n = 0/26 and 36% n = 4/11, respectively; p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 specific mAb was safe and may reduce hospitalization compared to what is reported in malignant hematology patients at high risk for disease progression. Our HCT cohort patients had less hospitalization rate compared with HM cohort patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rearrangements of I lysine [K] methyltransferase 2 A i ( I KMT2A i ) gene, previously known as the I MLL i gene, occur in 3 to 7% of adult patients with de novo AML and are enriched in therapy-related disease, particularly after treatment with topoisomerase II inhibitors [[1]]. Response and survival of patients with KMT2A rearranged acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agent therapy (HMA). The inferior prognosis of KMT2A rearranged AML patients undergoing alloSCT presents an opportunity for post-transplant maintenance trials with therapies targeting KMT2A. [Extracted from the article]

The 1-year OS for HCT patients (21 patients) was 85% (95% CI 61-95%) compared to 41% (95% CI 16-65%) in non-HCT patients in cCR (14 patients). The 1-year LFS in patients who underwent HCT (21 patients) was 67% (95% CI 41-84%) I versus i 33% (95% CI 10-57%) in non-HCT patients in cCR (14 patients). [Extracted from the article]

Background: Blinatumomab has demonstrated encouraging activity in relapsed/refractory (r/r) and minimal residual disease–positive (MRD+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Extramedullary disease (EMD) relapse or relapse with CD19– disease has been observed after blinatumomab therapy in patients with r/r or MRD+ ALL. However, the pathophysiology and risk factors of treatment failure are not fully understood. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of adult patients with B‐cell ALL treated with blinatumomab (n = 132) for either r/r (n = 103) or MRD+ disease (n = 29) at the authors' center (2013‐2021) and analyzed factors associated with treatment response and EMD failure. Results: The overall response rate was 64%. A lower marrow blast burden before blinatumomab (P =.049) and no history of previous EMD (P =.019) were significantly associated with a higher response. Among the patients who responded to blinatumomab, 56% underwent consolidation with allogeneic transplantation. Blinatumomab failure was observed in 89 patients; 43% of these patients (n = 38) either progressed or relapsed at extramedullary sites. A history of extramedullary involvement (53% vs 24%; P =.005) and retention of CD19 expression at the time of relapse/progression (97% vs 74%; P =.012) were associated with a higher risk for extramedullary failure. Central nervous system (CNS) failure after blinatumomab was encountered in 39% of the patients with EMD. Conclusions: A history of EMD predicted an inferior response to blinatumomab therapy with a higher risk for relapse/progression at extramedullary sites (particularly CNS). Consolidation with allogenic transplantation in patients who primarily responded to blinatumomab did not abrogate the risk of extramedullary relapse. The incorporation of extramedullary assessment and the intensification of CNS prophylaxis may help in addressing extramedullary failure. Lay Summary: Extramedullary failure is common during blinatumomab therapy for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.A history of extramedullary disease predicts an inferior response to blinatumomab therapy and a higher risk for relapse/progression at extramedullary sites.Most extramedullary failure cases retain CD19 expression. Extramedullary failure is common during blinatumomab therapy for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A history of extramedullary disease predicts an inferior response to blinatumomab therapy and a higher risk for relapse/progression at extramedullary sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a heterogenous disease with a variety of morphologic and genetic features, some of which are associated with high risk disease. Here we critically analyze the current state of the understanding of MCL's biology and its implications in therapy, with a focus on chemotherapy-free and targeted therapy regimens. Recent Findings: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, defined by a hallmark chromosomal translocation t(11;14) which leads to constitutive expression of cyclin D1. Recent discoveries in the biology of MCL have identified a number of factors, including TP53 mutations and complex karyotype, that lead to unresponsiveness to traditional chemoimmunotherapy and poor outcomes. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, BH3-mimetics and other novel agents thwart survival of the neoplastic B-cells in a manner independent of high-risk mutations and have shown promising activity in relapsed/refractory MCL. These therapies are being investigated in the frontline setting, while optimal responses to chemotherapy-free regimens, particularly in high-risk disease, might require combination approaches. Summary: High-risk MCL does not respond well to chemoimmunotherapy. Targeted agents are highly active in the relapsed refractory setting and show promise in high-risk disease. Novel approaches may soon replace the current standard of care in both relapsed and frontline settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Some patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have a history of previous malignancies. To the authors' knowledge, outcomes for CML diagnosed in these patients have not been well described. The current study was conducted to determine the outcome of patients with CML and a history of prior malignancies.Methods: The current study included patients who were enrolled in clinical trials of tyrosine kinase inhibitors as initial therapy for CML in chronic phase from July 2000 to January 2014.Results: Of the 630 patients with CML who were treated with frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitors, 626 had a known prior malignancy status. Of these, 45 patients (7%) had a prior malignancy other than nonmelanoma skin cancer whereas 17 patients (3%) had a history of nonmelanoma skin cancers alone. Characteristics of CML were similar between the patients with no prior malignancy, those with a prior malignancy, and those with nonmelanoma skin cancer. Patients with a prior malignancy were found to have an older median age compared with the other 2 groups. The most common prior malignancies were nonmelanoma skin cancer in 20 patients, breast cancer in 11 patients, melanoma in 7 patients, prostate cancer in 6 patients, and colorectal cancer in 5 patients. With regard to CML, the event-free survival, transformation-free survival, and failure-free survival rates were found to be similar between the groups. There was a statistically significantly decreased survival in the group with a prior malignancy versus the group with no prior malignancy versus the group with nonmelanoma skin cancer. In a multivariate analysis, advanced age and an elevated creatinine level were found to be associated with worse survival after a diagnosis of CML.Conclusions: Patients with CML with a history of prior malignancies appear to have the same excellent outcome as patients with no prior malignancies. In the few instances in which concomitant therapy for other malignancies was required during therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, this was able to be accomplished without significant toxicity. Cancer 2017;123:609-616. © 2016 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractReactive pleocytosis in the CSF has been observed with blinatumomab but has not been well-described. We performed a retrospective study of 88 patients who received intrathecal chemotherapy (IT) while on blinatumomab with CSF analyzed to determine if pleocytosis had an impact efficacy and safety. Blinatumomab was used for relapsed/refractory 62.5%, MRD-positive 31.8%, and consolidation in MRD-negative 5.7%. The incidence of pleocytosis in CSF was 51% and was more frequent after day 15 (55.8% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.025). Pleocytosis did not impact CR, clearance of MRD positivity, PFS and OS rates. Lower incidence of non-CNS extramedullary relapse was seen (3.7% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.011) with pleocytosis in CSF. Analysis of CSF by flow cytometry showed median CD4:CD8 ratio of 1.34. In conclusion, CSF pleocytosis is prevalent with blinatumomab but only demonstrated lower rates of non-CNS extramedullary relapse but no impact on CNS relapse or neurotoxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Midostaurin is a multikinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 mutated (FLT3m) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Azole antifungal medications are commonly used in AML and are known to interact with anti-cancer drugs such as midostaurin through the CYP3A pathway. However, there are no midostaurin related dose modifications recommended with strong CYP3A inhibitors.We retrospectively reviewed 40 patients between 2017–2022 and compared efficacy and safety outcomes in patients who received azole antifungals concurrently to those who did not receive an azole or received it sequentially to midostaurin for treatment of FLT3m AML.Median age of both groups was approximately 55 years and 70% of patients harbored FLT-3 internal tandem duplication mutations. Most patients in the concurrent arm were on either posaconazole (33%) or isavuconazole (50%) for antifungal prophylaxis and micafungin (72%) for the sequential/no azole arm. Overall CR/CRi rate with concurrent versus sequential/no azole were 72% and 77%, and non-hematologic grade 3 toxicities were 22% and 40% (p = 0.21), respectively. Rates of dose reductions (6% vs. 0%, p = 0.26) and held doses (17% vs. 14%, p = 0.79) were not different between concurrent and sequential/no azole. There were no differences in the rates of new fungal infection during induction between the two groups.Azoles given concurrently or sequentially with midostaurin were found to be equally safe and effective in the treatment of newly diagnosed FLT3 AML. Additional confirmatory studies are needed due to our limited sample size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]