Search

Your search keyword '"Kater, G. Matthijs"' showing total 6 results
Start Over Author "Kater, G. Matthijs" Search Limiters Academic (Peer-Reviewed) Journals
6 results on '"Kater, G. Matthijs"'

1. Endoscopic versus percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Author

Coelen, Robert J S, Roos, Eva, Wiggers, Jimme K, Besselink, Marc G, Buis, Carlijn I, Busch, Olivier R C, Dejong, Cornelis H C, van Delden, Otto M, van Eijck, Casper H J, Fockens, Paul, Gouma, Dirk J, Koerkamp, Bas Groot, de Haan, Michiel W, van Hooft, Jeanin E, IJzermans, Jan N M, Kater, G Matthijs, Koornstra, Jan J, van Lienden, Krijn P, Moelker, Adriaan, Damink, Steven W M Olde, Poley, Jan-Werner, Porte, Robert J, de Ridder, Rogier J, Verheij, Joanne, van Woerden, Victor, Rauws, Erik A J, Dijkgraaf, Marcel G W, and van Gulik, Thomas M

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Resectability and Ablatability Criteria for the Treatment of Liver Only Colorectal Metastases: Multidisciplinary Consensus Document from the COLLISION Trial Group

Author

Nieuwenhuizen, Sanne, primary, Puijk, Robbert S., additional, van den Bemd, Bente, additional, Aldrighetti, Luca, additional, Arntz, Mark, additional, van den Boezem, Peter B., additional, Bruynzeel, Anna M. E., additional, Burgmans, Mark C., additional, de Cobelli, Francesco, additional, Coolsen, Marielle M. E., additional, Dejong, Cornelis H. C., additional, Derks, Sarah, additional, Diederik, Arjen, additional, van Duijvendijk, Peter, additional, Eker, Hasan H., additional, Engelsman, Anton F., additional, Erdmann, Joris I., additional, Fütterer, Jurgen J., additional, Geboers, Bart, additional, Groot, Gerie, additional, Haasbeek, Cornelis J. A., additional, Janssen, Jan-Jaap, additional, de Jong, Koert P., additional, Kater, G. Matthijs, additional, Kazemier, Geert, additional, Kruimer, Johan W. H., additional, Leclercq, Wouter K. G., additional, van der Leij, Christiaan, additional, Manusama, Eric R., additional, Meier, Mark A. J., additional, van der Meijs, Bram B., additional, Melenhorst, Marleen C. A. M., additional, Nielsen, Karin, additional, Nijkamp, Maarten W., additional, Potters, Fons H., additional, Prevoo, Warner, additional, Rietema, Floris J., additional, Ruarus, Alette H., additional, Ruiter, Simeon J. S., additional, Schouten, Evelien A. C., additional, Serafino, Gian Piero, additional, Sietses, Colin, additional, Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan, additional, Timmer, Florentine E. F., additional, Versteeg, Kathelijn S., additional, Vink, Ted, additional, de Vries, Jan J. J., additional, de Wilt, Johannes H. W., additional, Zonderhuis, Barbara M., additional, Scheffer, Hester J., additional, van den Tol, Petrousjka M. P., additional, and Meijerink, Martijn R., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Endoscopic versus percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Author

Coelen, Robert J. S., Coelen, Robert J. S., Roos, Eva, Wiggers, Jimme K., Besselink, Marc G., Buis, Carlijn I., Busch, Olivier R. C., Dejong, Cornelis H. C., van Delden, Otto M., van Eijck, Casper H. J., Fockens, Paul, Gouma, Dirk J., Koerkamp, Bas Groot, de Haan, Michiel W., van Hooft, Jeanin E., IJzermans, Jan N. M., Kater, G. Matthijs, Koornstra, Jan J., van Lienden, Krijn P., Moelker, Adriaan, Damink, Steven W. M. Olde, Poley, Jan-Werner, Porte, Robert J., de Ridder, Rogier J., Verheij, Joanne, van Woerden, Victor, Rauws, Erik A. J., Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W., van Gulik, Thomas M., Coelen, Robert J. S., Coelen, Robert J. S., Roos, Eva, Wiggers, Jimme K., Besselink, Marc G., Buis, Carlijn I., Busch, Olivier R. C., Dejong, Cornelis H. C., van Delden, Otto M., van Eijck, Casper H. J., Fockens, Paul, Gouma, Dirk J., Koerkamp, Bas Groot, de Haan, Michiel W., van Hooft, Jeanin E., IJzermans, Jan N. M., Kater, G. Matthijs, Koornstra, Jan J., van Lienden, Krijn P., Moelker, Adriaan, Damink, Steven W. M. Olde, Poley, Jan-Werner, Porte, Robert J., de Ridder, Rogier J., Verheij, Joanne, van Woerden, Victor, Rauws, Erik A. J., Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W., and van Gulik, Thomas M.

Abstract

Background In patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, biliary drainage is recommended to treat obstructive jaundice and optimise the clinical condition before liver resection. Little evidence exists on the preferred initial method of biliary drainage. We therefore investigated the incidence of severe drainage-related complications of endoscopic biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.Methods We did a multicentre, randomised controlled trial at four academic centres in the Netherlands. Patients who were aged at least 18 years with potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma requiring major liver resection, and biliary obstruction of the future liver remnant (defined as a bilirubin concentration of >50 mu mol/L [2.9 mg/dL]), were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive endoscopic biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage through the use of computer-generated allocation. Randomisation, done by the trial coordinator, was stratified for previous (attempted) biliary drainage, the extent of bile duct involvement, and enrolling centre. Patients were enrolled by clinicians of the participating centres. The primary outcome was the number of severe complications between randomisation and surgery in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered at the Netherlands National Trial Register, number NTR4243.Findings From Sept 26, 2013, to April 29, 2016, 261 patients were screened for participation, and 54 eligible patients were randomly assigned to endoscopic biliary drainage (n=27) or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (n=27). The study was prematurely closed because of higher mortality in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage group (11 [41%] of 27 patients) than in the endoscopic biliary drainage group (three [11%] of 27 patients; relative risk 3.67, 95% CI 1.15-11.69; p=0.03). Three of the 11 deaths

Published
2018

6. Relining of a Bridging Covered Stent to Treat a Rare Cause of Type IIIc Endoleak Following Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Author

Huistra, Emiel W. M., Tielliu, Ignace F. J., Kater, G. Matthijs, Bloemsma, Gijs C., and Zeebregts, Clark J.

Abstract

Purpose: To present a rare cause of type III endoleak via the left renal artery (LRA) fenestration following fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) and to describe a successful reintervention for treating this endoleak.Technique: The patient presented with a type IIIc endoleak following FEVAR, due to inadvertent placement of the LRA bridging balloon expandable covered stent (BECS) via the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) fenestration, but deployed outside the SMA fenestration. The proximal part of the BECS was positioned outside of the main body. This caused a type IIIc endoleak via the open LRA fenestration. Reintervention was performed by relining the LRA with a new BECS. First, access to the lumen of the previously placed BECS was gained using a re-entry catheter, followed by placement of a new BECS via the LRA fenestration. Completion angiography, and computerized tomography angiography (CTA) at 3 months follow-up showed total obliteration of the endoleak and patency of the LRA.Conclusion: Placement of a bridging stent via an incorrect fenestration during FEVAR is a rare cause of type III endoleak. In certain cases, successful treatment of such an endoleak could be achieved by perforation and relining of the misplaced BECS via the correct fenestration of the target vessel.Clinical Impact To our best knowledge, a type IIIc endoleak following fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair, due to placement of a bridging covered stent through an incorrect fenestration and deployed short of the fenestration, has not been described before. Reintervention was performed with perforation of the previously placed covered stent and relining using a new bridging covered stent. The technique presented here was successful for treating the endoleak in this case and could help guide clinicians when dealing with this or similar complications.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results