Search

Public engagement in ethically laden pandemic planning decisions may be important for transparency, creating public trust, improving compliance with public health orders, and ultimately, contributing to just outcomes. We conducted focus groups with members of the public to characterize public perceptions about social distancing measures likely to be implemented during a pandemic. Participants expressed concerns about job security and economic strain on families if businesses or school closures are prolonged. They shared opposition to closure of religious organizations, citing the need for shared support and worship during times of crises. Group discussions elicited evidence of community-mindedness (e.g., recognition of an extant duty not to infect others), while some also acknowledged strong self-interest. Participants conveyed desire for opportunities for public input and education, and articulated distrust of government. Social distancing measures may be challenging to implement and sustain due to strains on family resources and lack of trust in government. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is important in training doctors for high-quality care. Yet little is known about whether ambulatory precepting incorporates the concepts and principles of EBM.Methods The authors observed and audiotaped 95 internal medicine residency precepting interactions and rated interactions using a qualitative analytic template consisting of three criteria: (1) presence of clinical questions; (2) presence of an evidence-based process; and (3) resident ability to articulate a clinical question.Results Sixty-seven of 95 audio tapes (71%) were of acceptable quality to allow template analysis. Thirty (45%) contained explicit clinical questions; 11 (16%) included an evidence-based process. Resident ability to articulate a clinical question when promptedwas rated as at least 'fair' in 59 of 67 interactions (88%).Conclusions EBM was not optimally implemented in these clinics. Future research could explore more systematically what factors facilitate or impair the use of EBM in the real-time ambulatory training context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Institutional academic-industry relationships have the potential of creating institutional conflicts of interest. To date there are no empirical data to support the establishment and evaluation of institutional policies and practices related to managing these relationships.Objective: To conduct a national survey of department chairs about the nature, extent, and consequences of institutional-academic industry relationships for medical schools and teaching hospitals.Design, Setting, and Participants: National survey of department chairs in the 125 accredited allopathic medical schools and the 15 largest independent teaching hospitals in the United States, administered between February 2006 and October 2006.Main Outcome Measure: Types of relationships with industry.Results: A total of 459 of 688 eligible department chairs completed the survey, yielding an overall response rate of 67%. Almost two-thirds (60%) of department chairs had some form of personal relationship with industry, including serving as a consultant (27%), a member of a scientific advisory board (27%), a paid speaker (14%), an officer (7%), a founder (9%), or a member of the board of directors (11%). Two-thirds (67%) of departments as administrative units had relationships with industry. Clinical departments were more likely than nonclinical departments to receive research equipment (17% vs 10%, P = .04), unrestricted funds (19% vs 3%, P < .001), residency or fellowship training support (37% vs 2%, P < .001), and continuing medial education support (65% vs 3%, P < .001). However, nonclinical departments were more likely to receive funding from intellectual property licensing (27% vs 16%, P = .01). More than two-thirds of chairs perceived that having a relationship with industry had no effect on their professional activities, 72% viewed a chair's engaging in more than 1 industry-related activity (substantial role in a start-up company, consulting, or serving on a company's board) as having a negative impact on a department's ability to conduct independent unbiased research.Conclusion: Overall, institutional academic-industry relationships are highly prevalent and underscore the need for their active disclosure and management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many initiatives for covering the uninsured call for 'basic' health care coverage, yet few define that term. The Just Coverage project used a computer-based simulation exercise to learn how nearly 800 community members in northern California identified the inclusions and exclusions that would constitute basic coverage. Working with a limited budget, participants distinguished essential from nonessential health care needs, resisted high patient cost sharing, and tolerated tight restrictions on provider choice. They also supported practice guidelines and standards of effectiveness, and they excluded high-cost, low-value interventions. These results reinforce the importance of community input to policymakers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Training in ethics and professionalism is a fundamental component of residency education, yet there is little empirical information to guide curricula. The objective of this study is to describe empirically derived ethics objectives for ethics and professionalism training for multiple specialties. Study design is a thematic analysis of documents, semi-structured interviews, and focus groups conducted in a setting of an academic medical center, Veterans Administration, and community hospital training more than 1000 residents. Participants were 84 informants in 13 specialties including residents, program directors, faculty, practicing physicians, and ethics committees. Thematic analysis identified commonalities across informants and specialties. Resident and nonresident informants identified consent, interprofessional relationships, family interactions, communication skills, and end-of-life care as essential components of training. Nonresidents also emphasized formal ethics instruction, resource allocation, and self-monitoring, whereas residents emphasized the learning environment and resident-attending interactions. Conclusions are that empirically derived learning needs for ethics and professionalism included many topics, such as informed consent and resource allocation, relevant for most specialties, providing opportunities for shared curricula and resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prudent, specific planning for care will ensure that you can honor patients' wishes and respect their values as the end of life approaches. We offer practical advice for incorporating advance planning into your practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prudent, specific planning for care will ensure that you can honor patients' wishes and respect their value as the end of life approaches. We offer practical advice for incorporating advance planning into your practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

CONTEXT: Hospice is underused by older, rural, and minority populations. OBJECTIVE: Because local availability of hospice is an important predictor of use, we aimed to identify geographic variation in hospice supply and examine its community-level determinants, including wealth. METHODS: This was an observational geographic study using the 2008 National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization's National Data Set and the 2000 U.S. census data for 3140 U.S. counties. Our outcome of interest was hospice supply defined according to the number of hospice programs (regardless of level of care) servicing each county. We used binomial multivariable regression to test the relationship between supply and log-transformed counts of population, African Americans, Hispanics, residents aged 65, and high school educated residents as well as area, median household income, and certificate of need status. RESULTS: Hospice availability varied greatly across the United States, with an unadjusted mean of 24.3 hospice programs servicing each county (standard deviation 19.7, range 0-160). After adjusting for all covariates, median household income (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.03, P<0.001), population count (IRR 17.9, P<0.001), count of African Americans (IRR 1.26, P<0.001) and elderly adults (IRR 2.81, P<0.001) positively predicted supply, whereas area (IRR 0.84, P<0.001), certificate of need status (IRR 0.89, P<0.001), count of Hispanics (IRR 0.86, P<0.01), and high school educated (IRR 0.03, P<0.001) negatively predicted supply. CONCLUSION: There is gross variation in hospice supply that can be explained by community wealth, population density, age, ethnicity, and race. To address disparate utilization of hospice, the relationship between wealth and availability will need to be better understood. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]