119 results on '"Folberth, Christian"'
Search Results
2. Long-term soil organic carbon and crop yield feedbacks differ between 16 soil-crop models in sub-Saharan Africa
- Author
-
Couëdel, Antoine, Falconnier, Gatien N., Adam, Myriam, Cardinael, Rémi, Boote, Kenneth, Justes, Eric, Smith, Ward N., Whitbread, Anthony M., Affholder, François, Balkovic, Juraj, Basso, Bruno, Bhatia, Arti, Chakrabarti, Bidisha, Chikowo, Regis, Christina, Mathias, Faye, Babacar, Ferchaud, Fabien, Folberth, Christian, Akinseye, Folorunso M., Gaiser, Thomas, Galdos, Marcelo V., Gayler, Sebastian, Gorooei, Aram, Grant, Brian, Guibert, Hervé, Hoogenboom, Gerrit, Kamali, Bahareh, Laub, Moritz, Maureira, Fidel, Mequanint, Fasil, Nendel, Claas, Porter, Cheryl H., Ripoche, Dominique, Ruane, Alex C., Rusinamhodzi, Leonard, Sharma, Shikha, Singh, Upendra, Six, Johan, Srivastava, Amit, Vanlauwe, Bernard, Versini, Antoine, Vianna, Murilo, Webber, Heidi, Weber, Tobias K.D., Zhang, Congmu, and Corbeels, Marc
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Uncertainty in land-use adaptation persists despite crop model projections showing lower impacts under high warming
- Author
-
Molina Bacca, Edna J., Stevanović, Miodrag, Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon, Karstens, Kristine, Chen, David Meng-Chuen, Leip, Debbora, Müller, Christoph, Minoli, Sara, Heinke, Jens, Jägermeyr, Jonas, Folberth, Christian, Iizumi, Toshichika, Jain, Atul K., Liu, Wenfeng, Okada, Masashi, Smerald, Andrew, Zabel, Florian, Lotze-Campen, Hermann, and Popp, Alexander
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Rice availability and stability in Africa under future socio-economic development and climatic change
- Author
-
De Vos, Koen, Janssens, Charlotte, Jacobs, Liesbet, Campforts, Benjamin, Boere, Esther, Kozicka, Marta, Havlík, Petr, Folberth, Christian, Balkovič, Juraj, Maertens, Miet, and Govers, Gerard
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Limiting global warming to 2 °C benefits building climate resilience in rice-wheat systems in India through crop calendar management
- Author
-
Wang, Xiaobo, Wang, Shaoqiang, Folberth, Christian, Skalsky, Rastislav, Li, Hui, Liu, Yuanyuan, and Balkovic, Juraj
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Predicting spatiotemporal soil organic carbon responses to management using EPIC-IIASA meta-models
- Author
-
Ippolito, Tara, Balkovič, Juraj, Skalsky, Rastislav, Folberth, Christian, Krisztin, Tamas, and Neff, Jason
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. A high-resolution nutrient emission inventory for hotspot identification in the Yangtze River Basin
- Author
-
Li, Jincheng, Chen, Yan, Cai, Kaikui, Fu, Jiaxing, Ting, Tang, Chen, Yihui, Folberth, Christian, and Liu, Yong
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Potential impacts of climate change on agriculture and fisheries production in 72 tropical coastal communities
- Author
-
Cinner, Joshua E., Caldwell, Iain R., Thiault, Lauric, Ben, John, Blanchard, Julia L., Coll, Marta, Diedrich, Amy, Eddy, Tyler D., Everett, Jason D., Folberth, Christian, Gascuel, Didier, Guiet, Jerome, Gurney, Georgina G., Heneghan, Ryan F., Jägermeyr, Jonas, Jiddawi, Narriman, Lahari, Rachael, Kuange, John, Liu, Wenfeng, Maury, Olivier, Müller, Christoph, Novaglio, Camilla, Palacios-Abrantes, Juliano, Petrik, Colleen M., Rabearisoa, Ando, Tittensor, Derek P., Wamukota, Andrew, and Pollnac, Richard
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Crop calendar optimization for climate change adaptation in rice-based multiple cropping systems of India and Bangladesh
- Author
-
Wang, Xiaobo, Folberth, Christian, Skalsky, Rastislav, Wang, Shaoqiang, Chen, Bin, Liu, Yuanyuan, Chen, Jinghua, and Balkovic, Juraj
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Tracking the Dynamics and Uncertainties of Soil Organic Carbon in Agricultural Soils Based on a Novel Robust Meta-Model Framework Using Multisource Data.
- Author
-
Ermolieva, Tatiana, Havlik, Petr, Lessa-Derci-Augustynczik, Andrey, Frank, Stefan, Balkovic, Juraj, Skalsky, Rastislav, Deppermann, Andre, Nakhavali, Mahdi, Komendantova, Nadejda, Kahil, Taher, Wang, Gang, Folberth, Christian, and Knopov, Pavel S.
- Abstract
Monitoring and estimating spatially resolved changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks are necessary for supporting national and international policies aimed at assisting land degradation neutrality and climate change mitigation, improving soil fertility and food production, maintaining water quality, and enhancing renewable energy and ecosystem services. In this work, we report on the development and application of a data-driven, quantile regression machine learning model to estimate and predict annual SOC stocks at plow depth under the variability of climate. The model enables the analysis of SOC content levels and respective probabilities of their occurrence as a function of exogenous parameters such as monthly temperature and precipitation and endogenous, decision-dependent parameters, which can be altered by land use practices. The estimated quantiles and their trends indicate the uncertainty ranges and the respective likelihoods of plausible SOC content. The model can be used as a reduced-form scenario generator of stochastic SOC scenarios. It can be integrated as a submodel in Integrated Assessment models with detailed land use sectors such as GLOBIOM to analyze costs and find optimal land management practices to sequester SOC and fulfill food–water–energy–-environmental NEXUS security goals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Climate impacts on global agriculture emerge earlier in new generation of climate and crop models
- Author
-
Jägermeyr, Jonas, Müller, Christoph, Ruane, Alex C., Elliott, Joshua, Balkovic, Juraj, Castillo, Oscar, Faye, Babacar, Foster, Ian, Folberth, Christian, Franke, James A., Fuchs, Kathrin, Guarin, Jose R., Heinke, Jens, Hoogenboom, Gerrit, Iizumi, Toshichika, Jain, Atul K., Kelly, David, Khabarov, Nikolay, Lange, Stefan, Lin, Tzu-Shun, Liu, Wenfeng, Mialyk, Oleksandr, Minoli, Sara, Moyer, Elisabeth J., Okada, Masashi, Phillips, Meridel, Porter, Cheryl, Rabin, Sam S., Scheer, Clemens, Schneider, Julia M., Schyns, Joep F., Skalsky, Rastislav, Smerald, Andrew, Stella, Tommaso, Stephens, Haynes, Webber, Heidi, Zabel, Florian, and Rosenzweig, Cynthia
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. A regional nuclear conflict would compromise global food security
- Author
-
Jägermeyr, Jonas, Robock, Alan, Elliott, Joshua, Müller, Christoph, Xia, Lili, Khabarov, Nikolay, Folberth, Christian, Schmid, Erwin, Liu, Wenfeng, Zabel, Florian, Rabin, Sam S., Puma, Michael J., Heslin, Alison, Franke, James, Foster, Ian, Asseng, Senthold, Bardeen, Charles G., Toon, Owen B., and Rosenzweig, Cynthia
- Published
- 2020
13. Strong regional influence of climatic forcing datasets on global crop model ensembles
- Author
-
Ruane, Alex C., Phillips, Meridel, Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Jägermeyr, Jonas, Arneth, Almut, Balkovic, Juraj, Deryng, Delphine, Folberth, Christian, Iizumi, Toshichika, Izaurralde, Roberto C., Khabarov, Nikolay, Lawrence, Peter, Liu, Wenfeng, Olin, Stefan, Pugh, Thomas A.M., Rosenzweig, Cynthia, Sakurai, Gen, Schmid, Erwin, Sultan, Benjamin, Wang, Xuhui, de Wit, Allard, and Yang, Hong
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Verifiable soil organic carbon modelling to facilitate regional reporting of cropland carbon change: A test case in the Czech Republic
- Author
-
Balkovič, Juraj, Madaras, Mikuláš, Skalský, Rastislav, Folberth, Christian, Smatanová, Michaela, Schmid, Erwin, van der Velde, Marijn, Kraxner, Florian, and Obersteiner, Michael
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Global irrigation contribution to wheat and maize yield
- Author
-
Wang, Xuhui, Müller, Christoph, Elliot, Joshua, Mueller, Nathaniel D., Ciais, Philippe, Jägermeyr, Jonas, Gerber, James, Dumas, Patrice, Wang, Chenzhi, Yang, Hui, Li, Laurent, Deryng, Delphine, Folberth, Christian, Liu, Wenfeng, Makowski, David, Olin, Stefan, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Reddy, Ashwan, Schmid, Erwin, Jeong, Sujong, Zhou, Feng, and Piao, Shilong
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. The global cropland-sparing potential of high-yield farming
- Author
-
Folberth, Christian, Khabarov, Nikolay, Balkovič, Juraj, Skalský, Rastislav, Visconti, Piero, Ciais, Philippe, Janssens, Ivan A., Peñuelas, Josep, and Obersteiner, Michael
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Substantial Differences in Crop Yield Sensitivities Between Models Call for Functionality‐Based Model Evaluation.
- Author
-
Müller, Christoph, Jägermeyr, Jonas, Franke, James A., Ruane, Alex C., Balkovic, Juraj, Ciais, Philippe, Dury, Marie, Falloon, Pete, Folberth, Christian, Hank, Tobias, Hoffmann, Munir, Izaurralde, R. Cesar, Jacquemin, Ingrid, Khabarov, Nikolay, Liu, Wenfeng, Olin, Stefan, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Wang, Xuhui, Williams, Karina, and Zabel, Florian
- Subjects
CROP yields ,IMPACT response ,CARBON dioxide - Abstract
Crop models are often used to project future crop yield under climate and global change and typically show a broad range of outcomes. To understand differences in modeled responses, we analyzed modeled crop yield response types using impact response surfaces along four drivers of crop yield: carbon dioxide (C), temperature (T), water (W), and nitrogen (N). Crop yield response types help to understand differences in simulated responses per driver and their combinations rather than aggregated changes in yields as the result of simultaneous changes in various drivers. We find that models' sensitivities to the individual drivers are substantially different and often more different across models than across regions. There is some agreement across models with respect to the spatial patterns of response types but strong differences in the distribution of response types across models and their configurations suggests that models need to undergo further scrutiny. We suggest establishing standards in model evaluation based on emergent functionality not only against historical yield observations but also against dedicated experiments across different drivers to analyze emergent functional patterns of crop models. Plain Language Summary: Crop models are widely used to compute crop yields under future climate change. Yields are determined by many interacting processes. Simulated future crop yields often show a broad uncertainty range. We investigate the sensitivity of nine different crop models to individual model inputs (carbon dioxide, temperature, water, nitrogen) in a very large simulation data set and find that there are substantial differences. We conclude that crop model evaluation needs to include analyses of functional properties to avoid that very diverse model responses to drivers are not tracked if interacting processes cancel out in the historical evaluation period but not in future scenarios, leading to large differences between models. Key Points: Crop models show strong differences in input sensitivitiesStandardized modeling experiments reveal differences in emergent functional relationshipsNew standards in model evaluation are needed [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. A global clustering of terrestrial food production systems.
- Author
-
Jung, Martin, Boucher, Timothy M., Wood, Stephen A., Folberth, Christian, Wironen, Michael, Thornton, Philip, Bossio, Deborah, and Obersteiner, Michael
- Subjects
FOOD production ,LAND degradation ,SUSTAINABLE agriculture ,ENVIRONMENTAL degradation ,SOCIOECONOMIC factors - Abstract
Food production is at the heart of global sustainability challenges, with unsustainable practices being a major driver of biodiversity loss, emissions and land degradation. The concept of foodscapes, defined as the characteristics of food production along biophysical and socio-economic gradients, could be a way addressing those challenges. By identifying homologues foodscapes classes possible interventions and leverage points for more sustainable agriculture could be identified. Here we provide a globally consistent approximation of the world's foodscape classes. We integrate global data on biophysical and socio-economic factors to identify a minimum set of emergent clusters and evaluate their characteristics, vulnerabilities and risks with regards to global change factors. Overall, we find food production globally to be highly concentrated in a few areas. Worryingly, we find particularly intensively cultivated or irrigated foodscape classes to be under considerable climatic and degradation risks. Our work can serve as baseline for global-scale zoning and gap analyses, while also revealing homologous areas for possible agricultural interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Coordinating AgMIP data and models across global and regional scales for 1.5°C and 2.0°C assessments
- Author
-
Rosenzweig, Cynthia, Ruane, Alex C., Antle, John, Elliott, Joshua, Ashfaq, Muhammad, Chatta, Ashfaq Ahmad, Ewert, Frank, Folberth, Christian, Hathie, Ibrahima, Havlik, Petr, Hoogenboom, Gerrit, Lotze-Campen, Hermann, MacCarthy, Dilys S., Mason-D’Croz, Daniel, Contreras, Erik Mencos, Müller, Christoph, Perez-Dominguez, Ignacio, Phillips, Meridel, Porter, Cheryl, Raymundo, Rubi M., Sands, Ronald D., Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich, Valdivia, Roberto O., Valin, Hugo, and Wiebe, Keith
- Published
- 2018
20. Biophysical and economic implications for agriculture of +1.5° and +2.0°C global warming using AgMIP Coordinated Global and Regional Assessments
- Author
-
Ruane, Alex C., Antle, John, Elliott, Joshua, Folberth, Christian, Hoogenboom, Gerrit, Mason-D'Croz, Daniel, Müller, Christoph, Porter, Cheryl, Phillips, Meridel M., Raymundo, Rubi M., Sands, Ronald, Valdivia, Roberto O., White, Jeffrey W., Wiebe, Keith, and Rosenzweig, Cynthia
- Published
- 2018
21. Global investigation of impacts of PET methods on simulating crop-water relations for maize
- Author
-
Liu, Wenfeng, Yang, Hong, Folberth, Christian, Wang, Xiuying, Luo, Qunying, and Schulin, Rainer
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset
- Author
-
Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Kelly, David, Arneth, Almut, Balkovic, Juraj, Ciais, Philippe, Deryng, Delphine, Folberth, Christian, Hoek, Steven, Izaurralde, Roberto C., Jones, Curtis D., Khabarov, Nikolay, Lawrence, Peter, Liu, Wenfeng, Olin, Stefan, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Reddy, Ashwan, Rosenzweig, Cynthia, Ruane, Alex C., Sakurai, Gen, Schmid, Erwin, Skalsky, Rastislav, Wang, Xuhui, de Wit, Allard, and Yang, Hong
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. State-of-the-art global models underestimate impacts from climate extremes
- Author
-
Schewe, Jacob, Gosling, Simon N., Reyer, Christopher, Zhao, Fang, Ciais, Philippe, Elliott, Joshua, Francois, Louis, Huber, Veronika, Lotze, Heike K., Seneviratne, Sonia I., van Vliet, Michelle T. H., Vautard, Robert, Wada, Yoshihide, Breuer, Lutz, Büchner, Matthias, Carozza, David A., Chang, Jinfeng, Coll, Marta, Deryng, Delphine, de Wit, Allard, Eddy, Tyler D., Folberth, Christian, Frieler, Katja, Friend, Andrew D., Gerten, Dieter, Gudmundsson, Lukas, Hanasaki, Naota, Ito, Akihiko, Khabarov, Nikolay, Kim, Hyungjun, Lawrence, Peter, Morfopoulos, Catherine, Müller, Christoph, Müller Schmied, Hannes, Orth, René, Ostberg, Sebastian, Pokhrel, Yadu, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Sakurai, Gen, Satoh, Yusuke, Schmid, Erwin, Stacke, Tobias, Steenbeek, Jeroen, Steinkamp, Jörg, Tang, Qiuhong, Tian, Hanqin, Tittensor, Derek P., Volkholz, Jan, Wang, Xuhui, and Warszawski, Lila
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Global wheat production potentials and management flexibility under the representative concentration pathways
- Author
-
Balkovič, Juraj, van der Velde, Marijn, Skalský, Rastislav, Xiong, Wei, Folberth, Christian, Khabarov, Nikolay, Smirnov, Alexey, Mueller, Nathaniel D., and Obersteiner, Michael
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Multisectoral climate impact hotspots in a warming world
- Author
-
Piontek, Franziska, Müller, Christoph, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Clark, Douglas B., Deryng, Delphine, Elliott, Joshua, de Jesus Colón González, Felipe, Flörke, Martina, Folberth, Christian, Franssen, Wietse, Frieler, Katja, Friend, Andrew D., Gosling, Simon N., Hemming, Deborah, Khabarov, Nikolay, Kim, Hyungjun, Lomas, Mark R., Masaki, Yoshimitsu, Mengel, Matthias, Morse, Andrew, Neumann, Kathleen, Nishina, Kazuya, Ostberg, Sebastian, Pavlick, Ryan, Ruane, Alex C., Schewe, Jacob, Schmid, Erwin, Stacke, Tobias, Tang, Qiuhong, Tessler, Zachary D., Tompkins, Adrian M., Warszawski, Lila, Wisser, Dominik, and Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim
- Published
- 2014
26. Constraints and potentials of future irrigation water availability on agricultural production under climate change
- Author
-
Elliott, Joshua, Deryng, Delphine, Müller, Christoph, Frieler, Katja, Konzmann, Markus, Gerten, Dieter, Glotter, Michael, Flörke, Martina, Wada, Yoshihide, Best, Neil, Eisner, Stephanie, Fekete, Balázs M., Folberth, Christian, Foster, Ian, Gosling, Simon N., Haddeland, Ingjerd, Khabarov, Nikolay, Ludwig, Fulco, Masaki, Yoshimitsu, Olin, Stefan, Rosenzweig, Cynthia, Ruane, Alex C., Satoh, Yusuke, Schmid, Erwin, Stacke, Tobias, Tang, Qiuhong, and Wisser, Dominik
- Published
- 2014
27. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison
- Author
-
Rosenzweig, Cynthia, Elliott, Joshua, Deryng, Delphine, Ruane, Alex C., Müller, Christoph, Arneth, Almut, Boote, Kenneth J., Folberth, Christian, Glotter, Michael, Khabarov, Nikolay, Neumann, Kathleen, Piontek, Franziska, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Schmid, Erwin, Stehfest, Elke, Yang, Hong, and Jones, James W.
- Published
- 2014
28. Increase of Simultaneous Soybean Failures Due To Climate Change.
- Author
-
Goulart, Henrique M. D., van der Wiel, Karin, Folberth, Christian, Boere, Esther, and van den Hurk, Bart
- Subjects
SOYBEAN ,EXTREME weather ,PRODUCTION losses ,AGRICULTURAL productivity ,WEATHER ,CLIMATE change - Abstract
While soybeans are among the most consumed crops in the world, most of its production lies in the US, Brazil, and Argentina. The concentration of soybean growing regions in the Americas renders the supply chain vulnerable to regional disruptions. In 2012, anomalous hot and dry conditions occurring simultaneously in these regions led to low soybean yields, which drove global soybean prices to all‐time records. In this study, we explore climate change impacts on simultaneous extreme crop failures as the one from 2012. We develop a hybrid model, coupling a process‐based crop model with a machine learning model, to improve the simulation of soybean production. We assess the frequency and magnitude of events with similar or higher impacts than 2012 under different future scenarios, evaluating anomalies both with respect to present day and future conditions to disentangle the impacts of (changing) climate variability from the long‐term mean trends. We find long‐term trends in mean climate increase the frequency of 2012 analogs by 11–16 times and the magnitude by 4–15% compared to changes in climate variability only depending on the global climate scenario. Conversely, anomalies like the 2012 event due to changes in climate variability show an increase in frequency in each country individually, but not simultaneously across the Americas. We deduce that adaptation of the crop production practice to the long‐term mean trends of climate change may considerably reduce the future risk of simultaneous soybean losses across the Americas. Plain Language Summary: Soybeans are the main source of protein for livestock in the world. Most of its production is concentrated in regions in The United States of America, Brazil, and Argentina. In 2012, simultaneous soybean losses in these three countries due to anomalous weather conditions led to shortages in global supplies and to record prices. In this study, we investigate how climate change can affect future events with similar impacts as the one from 2012. We develop a numerical model to establish relations between weather conditions and soybean yields. We use future scenarios with different levels of global warming, and we analyze the soybean losses with respect to present day and future conditions. We find that the number of simultaneous soybean losses similar to the 2012 event increase in the future due to changes in the mean climate conditions. However, simultaneous soybean production losses due to changes in climate variability are not frequent, despite each country showing frequent regional losses. We deduce that if successful adaptation measures are adopted against the changes in mean climate, the future risk of extreme events such as the 2012 may be considerably reduced with respect to a future without any adaptation. Key Points: A hybrid crop model (i.e., physical crop model combined with machine learning) is presented, which outperforms the benchmark modelsSimultaneous soybean failures in the Americas under climate change are mostly driven by changes in mean climateChanges in climate variability increase country‐level soybean failures but such change is not found for simultaneous failures [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Regionalization of a large-scale crop growth model for sub-Saharan Africa: Model setup, evaluation, and estimation of maize yields
- Author
-
Folberth, Christian, Gaiser, Thomas, Abbaspour, Karim C., Schulin, Rainer, and Yang, Hong
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Agricultural breadbaskets shift poleward given adaptive farmer behavior under climate change.
- Author
-
Franke, James A., Müller, Christoph, Minoli, Sara, Elliott, Joshua, Folberth, Christian, Gardner, Charles, Hank, Tobias, Izaurralde, Roberto Cesar, Jägermeyr, Jonas, Jones, Curtis D., Liu, Wenfeng, Olin, Stefan, Pugh, Thomas A.M., Ruane, Alex C., Stephens, Haynes, Zabel, Florian, and Moyer, Elisabeth J.
- Subjects
WINTER wheat ,CLIMATE change ,RICE ,WHEAT ,GROWING season ,FARMERS ,FOOD production - Abstract
Modern food production is spatially concentrated in global "breadbaskets." A major unresolved question is whether these peak production regions will shift poleward as the climate warms, allowing some recovery of potential climate‐related losses. While agricultural impacts studies to date have focused on currently cultivated land, the Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison Project (GGCMI) Phase 2 experiment allows us to assess changes in both yields and the location of peak productivity regions under warming. We examine crop responses under projected end of century warming using seven process‐based models simulating five major crops (maize, rice, soybeans, and spring and winter wheat) with a variety of adaptation strategies. We find that in no‐adaptation cases, when planting date and cultivar choices are held fixed, regions of peak production remain stationary and yield losses can be severe, since growing seasons contract strongly with warming. When adaptations in management practices are allowed (cultivars that retain growing season length under warming and modified planting dates), peak productivity zones shift poleward and yield losses are largely recovered. While most growing‐zone shifts are ultimately limited by geography, breadbaskets studied here move poleward over 600 km on average by end of the century under RCP 8.5. These results suggest that agricultural impacts assessments can be strongly biased if restricted in spatial area or in the scope of adaptive behavior considered. Accurate evaluation of food security under climate change requires global modeling and careful treatment of adaptation strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Storylines of weather-induced crop failure events under climate change.
- Author
-
Goulart, Henrique M. D., van der Wiel, Karin, Folberth, Christian, Balkovic, Juraj, and van den Hurk, Bart
- Subjects
CLIMATE change ,AGRICULTURAL meteorology ,GLOBAL warming ,WEATHER ,ATMOSPHERIC models - Abstract
Unfavourable weather is a common cause for crop failures all over the world. Whilst extreme weather conditions may cause extreme impacts, crop failure commonly is induced by the occurrence of multiple and combined anomalous meteorological drivers. For these cases, the explanation of conditions leading to crop failure is complex, as the links connecting weather and crop yield can be multiple and non-linear. Furthermore, climate change is likely to perturb the meteorological conditions, possibly altering the occurrences of crop failures or leading to unprecedented drivers of extreme impacts. The goal of this study is to identify important meteorological drivers that cause crop failures and to explore changes in crop failures due to global warming. For that, we focus on a historical failure event, the extreme low soybean production during the 2012 season in the midwestern US. We first train a random forest model to identify the most relevant meteorological drivers of historical crop failures and to predict crop failure probabilities. Second, we explore the influence of global warming on crop failures and on the structure of compound drivers. We use large ensembles from the EC-Earth global climate model, corresponding to present-day, pre-industrial +2 and 3 ∘ C warming, respectively, to isolate the global warming component. Finally, we explore the meteorological conditions inductive for the 2012 crop failure and construct analogues of these failure conditions in future climate settings. We find that crop failures in the midwestern US are linked to low precipitation levels, and high temperature and diurnal temperature range (DTR) levels during July and August. Results suggest soybean failures are likely to increase with climate change. With more frequent warm years due to global warming, the joint hot–dry conditions leading to crop failures become mostly dependent on precipitation levels, reducing the importance of the relative compound contribution. While event analogues of the 2012 season are rare and not expected to increase, impact analogues show a significant increase in occurrence frequency under global warming, but for different combinations of the meteorological drivers than experienced in 2012. This has implications for assessment of the drivers of extreme impact events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Large potential for crop production adaptation depends on available future varieties.
- Author
-
Zabel, Florian, Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Minoli, Sara, Jägermeyr, Jonas, Schneider, Julia M., Franke, James A., Moyer, Elisabeth, Dury, Marie, Francois, Louis, Folberth, Christian, Liu, Wenfeng, Pugh, Thomas A.M., Olin, Stefan, Rabin, Sam S., Mauser, Wolfram, Hank, Tobias, Ruane, Alex C., and Asseng, Senthold
- Subjects
AGRICULTURAL productivity ,RICE ,CLIMATE change ,AGRICULTURAL climatology ,ATMOSPHERIC models ,CULTIVARS - Abstract
Climate change affects global agricultural production and threatens food security. Faster phenological development of crops due to climate warming is one of the main drivers for potential future yield reductions. To counter the effect of faster maturity, adapted varieties would require more heat units to regain the previous growing period length. In this study, we investigate the effects of variety adaptation on global caloric production under four different future climate change scenarios for maize, rice, soybean, and wheat. Thereby, we empirically identify areas that could require new varieties and areas where variety adaptation could be achieved by shifting existing varieties into new regions. The study uses an ensemble of seven global gridded crop models and five CMIP6 climate models. We found that 39% (SSP5‐8.5) of global cropland could require new crop varieties to avoid yield loss from climate change by the end of the century. At low levels of warming (SSP1‐2.6), 85% of currently cultivated land can draw from existing varieties to shift within an agro‐ecological zone for adaptation. The assumptions on available varieties for adaptation have major impacts on the effectiveness of variety adaptation, which could more than half in SSP5‐8.5. The results highlight that region‐specific breeding efforts are required to allow for a successful adaptation to climate change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Weather-induced crop failure events under climate change: a storyline approach.
- Author
-
Goulart, Henrique M. D., Wiel, Karin van der, Folberth, Christian, Balkovic, Juraj, and Hurk, Bart van den
- Subjects
CLIMATE change ,AGRICULTURAL meteorology ,GLOBAL warming ,WEATHER ,CROPS - Abstract
Unfavourable weather is a common cause for crop failures all over the world. Whilst extreme weather conditions may cause extreme impacts, crop failure commonly is induced by the occurrence of multiple and combined anomalous meteorological drivers. For these cases, the explanation of conditions leading to crop failure is complex, as the links connecting weather and crop yield can be multiple and non-linear. Furthermore, climate change is likely to perturb the meteorological conditions, possibly altering the occurrences of crop failures or leading to unprecedented drivers of extreme impacts. The goal of this study is to identify important meteorological drivers that cause crop failures and to explore changes in crop failures due to global warming. For that, we focus on a historical failure event, the extreme low soybean production during the 2012 season in the Midwest US. We first train a random forest model to identify the most relevant meteorological drivers of historical crop failures and to predict crop failure probabilities. Second, we explore the influence of global warming on crop failures and on the structure of compound drivers. We use large ensembles from the EC-Earth global climate model, corresponding to present day, pre-industrial +2 °C and 3 °C warming respectively, to isolate the global warming component. Finally, we explore the meteorological conditions inductive for the 2012 crop failure, and construct analogues of these failure conditions in future climate settings. Unlike present-day conditions, future warming may increase the probability of crop failures resulting from univariate meteorological features, reducing the importance of compound failure drivers. Impact-analogues show a significant increase under global warming, with changes in the corresponding drivers. This has implications for risk assessment, as changing drivers of extreme impact events are highly relevant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Exploring uncertainties in global crop yield projections in a large ensemble of crop models and CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate scenarios.
- Author
-
Müller, Christoph, Franke, James, Jägermeyr, Jonas, Ruane, Alex C, Elliott, Joshua, Moyer, Elisabeth, Heinke, Jens, Falloon, Pete D, Folberth, Christian, Francois, Louis, Hank, Tobias, Izaurralde, R César, Jacquemin, Ingrid, Liu, Wenfeng, Olin, Stefan, Pugh, Thomas A M, Williams, Karina, and Zabel, Florian
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Potential yield simulated by global gridded crop models: using a process-based emulator to explain their differences.
- Author
-
Ringeval, Bruno, Müller, Christoph, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Mueller, Nathaniel D., Ciais, Philippe, Folberth, Christian, Liu, Wenfeng, Debaeke, Philippe, and Pellerin, Sylvain
- Subjects
BEER-Lambert law ,RADIATION absorption ,GROWING season ,CROPS ,PRIMARY productivity (Biology) ,BIOMASS ,BIOMASS conversion - Abstract
How global gridded crop models (GGCMs) differ in their simulation of potential yield and reasons for those differences have never been assessed. The GGCM Intercomparison (GGCMI) offers a good framework for this assessment. Here, we built an emulator (called SMM for simple mechanistic model) of GGCMs based on generic and simplified formalism. The SMM equations describe crop phenology by a sum of growing degree days, canopy radiation absorption by the Beer–Lambert law, and its conversion into aboveground biomass by a radiation use efficiency (RUE). We fitted the parameters of this emulator against gridded aboveground maize biomass at the end of the growing season simulated by eight different GGCMs in a given year (2000). Our assumption is that the simple set of equations of SMM, after calibration, could reproduce the response of most GGCMs so that differences between GGCMs can be attributed to the parameters related to processes captured by the emulator. Despite huge differences between GGCMs, we show that if we fit both a parameter describing the thermal requirement for leaf emergence by adjusting its value to each grid-point in space, as done by GGCM modellers following the GGCMI protocol, and a GGCM-dependent globally uniform RUE, then the simple set of equations of the SMM emulator is sufficient to reproduce the spatial distribution of the original aboveground biomass simulated by most GGCMs. The grain filling is simulated in SMM by considering a fixed-in-time fraction of net primary productivity allocated to the grains (frac) once a threshold in leaves number (nthresh) is reached. Once calibrated, these two parameters allow for the capture of the relationship between potential yield and final aboveground biomass of each GGCM. It is particularly important as the divergence among GGCMs is larger for yield than for aboveground biomass. Thus, we showed that the divergence between GGCMs can be summarized by the differences in a few parameters. Our simple but mechanistic model could also be an interesting tool to test new developments in order to improve the simulation of potential yield at the global scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Projecting Exposure to Extreme Climate Impact Events Across Six Event Categories and Three Spatial Scales.
- Author
-
Lange, Stefan, Volkholz, Jan, Geiger, Tobias, Zhao, Fang, Vega, Iliusi, Veldkamp, Ted, Reyer, Christopher P. O., Warszawski, Lila, Huber, Veronika, Jägermeyr, Jonas, Schewe, Jacob, Bresch, David N., Büchner, Matthias, Chang, Jinfeng, Ciais, Philippe, Dury, Marie, Emanuel, Kerry, Folberth, Christian, Gerten, Dieter, and Gosling, Simon N.
- Subjects
TROPICAL cyclones ,GLOBAL warming ,HEAT waves (Meteorology) ,CLIMATE change ,DROUGHTS ,FOREST fires ,WILDFIRE prevention - Abstract
The extent and impact of climate‐related extreme events depend on the underlying meteorological, hydrological, or climatological drivers as well as on human factors such as land use or population density. Here we quantify the pure effect of historical and future climate change on the exposure of land and population to extreme climate impact events using an unprecedentedly large ensemble of harmonized climate impact simulations from the Inter‐Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b. Our results indicate that global warming has already more than doubled both the global land area and the global population annually exposed to all six categories of extreme events considered: river floods, tropical cyclones, crop failure, wildfires, droughts, and heatwaves. Global warming of 2°C relative to preindustrial conditions is projected to lead to a more than fivefold increase in cross‐category aggregate exposure globally. Changes in exposure are unevenly distributed, with tropical and subtropical regions facing larger increases than higher latitudes. The largest increases in overall exposure are projected for the population of South Asia. Plain Language Summary: Global warming changes the frequency, intensity, and spatial distribution of extreme events. We analyze computer simulations of river floods, tropical cyclones, crop failure, wildfires, droughts, and heatwaves under past, present‐day, and potential future climate conditions. Our results show that global warming increases the number of people around the world that are affected by these events each year, both for all event types combined and each type individually. Changes in the chance of being affected by extreme events are unevenly distributed in space. Particularly large increases are simulated for tropical and subtropical regions. Key Points: We quantify the pure effect of climate change on the exposure to extreme climate impact events, for both historical and future time periodsGlobal warming increases the global population exposure to river floods, tropical cyclones, crop failure, wildfires, droughts, and heatwavesThe largest increases in exposure are projected for tropical and subtropical regions [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. AgroTutor: A Mobile Phone Application Supporting Sustainable Agricultural Intensification.
- Author
-
Laso Bayas, Juan Carlos, Gardeazabal, Andrea, Karner, Mathias, Folberth, Christian, Vargas, Luis, Skalský, Rastislav, Balkovič, Juraj, Subash, Anto, Saad, Moemen, Delerce, Sylvain, Cuaresma, Jesús Crespo, Hlouskova, Jaroslava, Molina-Maturano, Janet, See, Linda, Fritz, Steffen, Obersteiner, Michael, and Govaerts, Bram
- Abstract
Traditional agricultural extension services rely on extension workers, especially in countries with large agricultural areas. In order to increase adoption of sustainable agriculture, the recommendations given by such services must be adapted to local conditions and be provided in a timely manner. The AgroTutor mobile application was built to provide highly specific and timely agricultural recommendations to farmers across Mexico and complement the work of extension agents. At the same time, AgroTutor provides direct contributions to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, either by advancing their implementation or providing local data systems to measure and monitor specific indicators such as the proportion of agricultural area under productive and sustainable agriculture. The application is freely available and allows farmers to geo-locate and register plots and the crops grown there, using the phone’s built-in GPS, or alternatively, on top of very high-resolution imagery. Once a crop and some basic data such as planting date and cultivar type have been registered, the application provides targeted information such as weather, potential and historical yield, financial benchmarking information, data-driven recommendations, and commodity price forecasts. Farmers are also encouraged to contribute in-situ information, e.g., soils, management, and yield data. The information can then be used by crop models, which, in turn, send tailored results back to the farmers. Initial feedback from farmers and extension agents has already improved some of the application’s characteristics. More enhancements are planned for inclusion in the future to increase the application’s function as a decision support tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Uncertainties, sensitivities and robustness of simulated water erosion in an EPIC-based global gridded crop model.
- Author
-
Carr, Tony W., Balkovič, Juraj, Dodds, Paul E., Folberth, Christian, Fulajtar, Emil, and Skalsky, Rastislav
- Subjects
EROSION ,SOIL erosion ,COVER crops ,AGRICULTURAL productivity ,ACQUISITION of data ,ENVIRONMENTAL indicators - Abstract
Water erosion on arable land can reduce soil fertility and agricultural productivity. Despite the impact of water erosion on crops, it is typically neglected in global crop yield projections. Furthermore, previous efforts to quantify global water erosion have paid little attention to the effects of field management on the magnitude of water erosion. In this study, we analyse the robustness of simulated water erosion estimates in maize and wheat fields between the years 1980 and 2010 based on daily model outputs from a global gridded version of the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) crop model. By using the MUSS water erosion equation and country-specific and environmental indicators determining different intensities in tillage, residue handling and cover crops, we obtained the global median water erosion rates of 7 t ha -1 a -1 in maize fields and 5 t ha -1 a -1 in wheat fields. A comparison of our simulation results with field data demonstrates an overlap of simulated and measured water erosion values for the majority of global cropland. Slope inclination and daily precipitation are key factors in determining the agreement between simulated and measured erosion values and are the most critical input parameters controlling all water erosion equations included in EPIC. The many differences between field management methods worldwide, the varying water erosion estimates from different equations and the complex distribution of cropland in mountainous regions add uncertainty to the simulation results. To reduce the uncertainties in global water erosion estimates, it is necessary to gather more data on global farming techniques to reduce the uncertainty in global land-use maps and to collect more data on soil erosion rates representing the diversity of environmental conditions where crops are grown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. The GGCMI Phase 2 emulators: global gridded crop model responses to changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen (version 1.0).
- Author
-
Franke, James A., Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Ruane, Alex C., Jägermeyr, Jonas, Snyder, Abigail, Dury, Marie, Falloon, Pete D., Folberth, Christian, François, Louis, Hank, Tobias, Izaurralde, R. Cesar, Jacquemin, Ingrid, Jones, Curtis, Li, Michelle, Liu, Wenfeng, Olin, Stefan, Phillips, Meridel, Pugh, Thomas A. M., and Reddy, Ashwan
- Subjects
ATMOSPHERIC carbon dioxide ,AGRICULTURAL climatology ,CLIMATE change ,CROPS ,GROWING season ,TEMPERATURE distribution - Abstract
Statistical emulation allows combining advantageous features of statistical and process-based crop models for understanding the effects of future climate changes on crop yields. We describe here the development of emulators for nine process-based crop models and five crops using output from the Global Gridded Model Intercomparison Project (GGCMI) Phase 2. The GGCMI Phase 2 experiment is designed with the explicit goal of producing a structured training dataset for emulator development that samples across four dimensions relevant to crop yields: atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations, temperature, water supply, and nitrogen inputs (CTWN). Simulations are run under two different adaptation assumptions: that growing seasons shorten in warmer climates, and that cultivar choice allows growing seasons to remain fixed. The dataset allows emulating the climatological-mean yield response of all models with a simple polynomial in mean growing-season values. Climatological-mean yields are a central metric in climate change impact analysis; we show here that they can be captured without relying on interannual variations. In general, emulation errors are negligible relative to differences across crop models or even across climate model scenarios; errors become significant only in some marginal lands where crops are not currently grown. We demonstrate that the resulting GGCMI emulators can reproduce yields under realistic future climate simulations, even though the GGCMI Phase 2 dataset is constructed with uniform CTWN offsets, suggesting that the effects of changes in temperature and precipitation distributions are small relative to those of changing means. The resulting emulators therefore capture relevant crop model responses in a lightweight, computationally tractable form, providing a tool that can facilitate model comparison, diagnosis of interacting factors affecting yields, and integrated assessment of climate impacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Potential yield simulated by Global Gridded Crop Models: a process-based emulator to explain their differences.
- Author
-
Ringeval, Bruno, Müller, Christoph, Pugh, Thomas A.M., Mueller, Nathaniel D., Ciais, Philippe, Folberth, Christian, Liu, Wenfeng, Debaeke, Philippe, and Pellerin, Sylvain
- Subjects
BEER-Lambert law ,RADIATION absorption ,PRIMARY productivity (Biology) ,GROWING season ,CROPS ,BIOMASS ,BIOMASS conversion - Abstract
How Global Gridded Crop Models (GGCMs) differ in their simulation of potential yield and reasons for those differences have never been assessed. The GGCM Inter-comparison (GGCMI) offers a good framework for this assessment. Here, we built an emulator (called SMM for Simple Mechanistic Model) of GGCMs based on generic and simplified formalism. The SMM equations describe crop phenology by a sum of growing degree days, canopy radiation absorption by the Beer-Lambert law, and its conversion into aboveground biomass by a radiation use efficiency (RUE). We fitted the parameters of this emulator against gridded aboveground maize biomass at the end of the growing season simulated by eight different GGCMs in a given year (2000). Our assumption is that the simple set of equations of SMM, after calibration, could reproduce the response of most GGCMs, so that differences between GGCMs can be attributed to the parameters related to processes captured by the emulator. Despite huge differences between GGCMs, we show that if we fit both a parameter describing the thermal requirement for leaf emergence by adjusting its value to each grid-point in space, as done by GGCM modellers following the GGCMI protocol, and a GGCM-dependent globally uniform RUE, then the simple set of equations of the SMM emulator is sufficient to reproduce the spatial distribution of the original aboveground biomass simulated by most GGCMs. The grain filling is simulated in SMM by considering a fixed in time fraction of net primary productivity allocated to the grain (frac) once a threshold in leaves number (nthresh) is reached. Once calibrated, these two parameters allow to capture the relationship between potential yield and final aboveground biomass of each GGCM. It is particularly important as the divergence among GGCMs is larger for yield than for aboveground biomass. Thus, we showed that the divergence between GGCMs can be summarized by the differences in few parameters. Our simple but mechanistic model could also be an interesting tool to test new developments in order to improve the simulation of potential yield at the global scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. The GGCMI Phase 2 experiment: global gridded crop model simulations under uniform changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen levels (protocol version 1.0).
- Author
-
Franke, James A., Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Ruane, Alex C., Jägermeyr, Jonas, Balkovic, Juraj, Ciais, Philippe, Dury, Marie, Falloon, Pete D., Folberth, Christian, François, Louis, Hank, Tobias, Hoffmann, Munir, Izaurralde, R. Cesar, Jacquemin, Ingrid, Jones, Curtis, Khabarov, Nikolay, Koch, Marian, Li, Michelle, and Liu, Wenfeng
- Subjects
SHIFTING cultivation ,IRRIGATION farming ,CROPS ,CROP yields ,DATA libraries ,DRY farming - Abstract
Concerns about food security under climate change motivate efforts to better understand future changes in crop yields. Process-based crop models, which represent plant physiological and soil processes, are necessary tools for this purpose since they allow representing future climate and management conditions not sampled in the historical record and new locations to which cultivation may shift. However, process-based crop models differ in many critical details, and their responses to different interacting factors remain only poorly understood. The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) Phase 2 experiment, an activity of the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP), is designed to provide a systematic parameter sweep focused on climate change factors and their interaction with overall soil fertility, to allow both evaluating model behavior and emulating model responses in impact assessment tools. In this paper we describe the GGCMI Phase 2 experimental protocol and its simulation data archive. A total of 12 crop models simulate five crops with systematic uniform perturbations of historical climate, varying CO2 , temperature, water supply, and applied nitrogen ("CTWN") for rainfed and irrigated agriculture, and a second set of simulations represents a type of adaptation by allowing the adjustment of growing season length. We present some crop yield results to illustrate general characteristics of the simulations and potential uses of the GGCMI Phase 2 archive. For example, in cases without adaptation, modeled yields show robust decreases to warmer temperatures in almost all regions, with a nonlinear dependence that means yields in warmer baseline locations have greater temperature sensitivity. Inter-model uncertainty is qualitatively similar across all the four input dimensions but is largest in high-latitude regions where crops may be grown in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. The GGCMI phase II emulators: global gridded crop model responses to changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen (version 1.0).
- Author
-
Franke, James, Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Ruane, Alex C., Jägermeyr, Jonas, Snyder, Abigail, Dury, Marie, Falloon, Pete, Folberth, Christian, François, Louis, Hank, Tobias, Izaurralde, R. Cesar, Jacquemin, Ingrid, Jones, Curtis, Li, Michelle, Wenfeng Liu, Olin, Stefan, Phillips, Meridel, Pugh, Thomas A. M., and Reddy, Ashwan
- Subjects
ATMOSPHERIC carbon dioxide ,AGRICULTURAL climatology ,CLIMATE change ,CROPS ,GROWING season - Abstract
Statistical emulation allows combining advantageous features of statistical and process-based crop models for understanding the effects of future climate changes on crop yields. We describe here the development of emulators for nine process-based crop models and five crops using output from the Global Gridded Model Intercomparison Project (GGCMI) Phase II. The GGCMI Phase II experiment is designed with the explicit goal of producing a structured training dataset for emulator development that samples across four dimensions relevant to crop yields: atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO
2 ) concentrations, temperature, water supply, and nitrogen inputs (CTWN). Simulations are run under two different adaptation assumptions: that growing seasons shorten in warmer climates, and that cultivar choice allows growing seasons to remain fixed. The dataset allows emulating the climatological mean yield response without relying on interannual variations; we show that these are quantitatively different. Climatological mean yield responses can be readily captured with a simple polynomial in nearly all locations, with errors significant only in some marginal lands where crops are not currently grown. In general, emulation errors are negligible relative to differences across crop models or even across climate model scenarios. We demonstrate that the resulting GGCMI emulators can reproduce yields under realistic future climate simulations, even though the GGCMI Phase II dataset is constructed with uniform CTWN offsets, suggesting that effects of changes in temperature and precipitation distributions are small relative to those of changing means. The resulting emulators therefore capture relevant crop model responses in a lightweight, computationally tractable form, providing a tool that can facilitate model comparison, diagnosis of interacting factors affecting yields, and integrated assessment of climate impacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Global Response Patterns of Major Rainfed Crops to Adaptation by Maintaining Current Growing Periods and Irrigation.
- Author
-
Minoli, Sara, Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Ruane, Alex C., Jägermeyr, Jonas, Zabel, Florian, Dury, Marie, Folberth, Christian, François, Louis, Hank, Tobias, Jacquemin, Ingrid, Liu, Wenfeng, Olin, Stefan, and Pugh, Thomas A. M.
- Subjects
CROP yields ,DRY farming ,IRRIGATION ,WATER shortages ,CROP management ,PHYSIOLOGICAL adaptation - Abstract
Increasing temperature trends are expected to impact yields of major field crops by affecting various plant processes, such as phenology, growth, and evapotranspiration. However, future projections typically do not consider the effects of agronomic adaptation in farming practices. We use an ensemble of seven Global Gridded Crop Models to quantify the impacts and adaptation potential of field crops under increasing temperature up to 6 K, accounting for model uncertainty. We find that without adaptation, the dominant effect of temperature increase is to shorten the growing period and to reduce grain yields and production. We then test the potential of two agronomic measures to combat warming‐induced yield reduction: (i) use of cultivars with adjusted phenology to regain the reference growing period duration and (ii) conversion of rainfed systems to irrigated ones in order to alleviate the negative temperature effects that are mediated by crop evapotranspiration. We find that cultivar adaptation can fully compensate global production losses up to 2 K of temperature increase, with larger potentials in continental and temperate regions. Irrigation could also compensate production losses, but its potential is highest in arid regions, where irrigation expansion would be constrained by water scarcity. Moreover, we discuss that irrigation is not a true adaptation measure but rather an intensification strategy, as it equally increases production under any temperature level. In the tropics, even when introducing both adapted cultivars and irrigation, crop production declines already at moderate warming, making adaptation particularly challenging in these areas. Plain Language Summary: Global warming affects yields of grain crops, which are at the base of human diets. We use crop models to quantify its impacts on global crop production and to assess how adaptation could compensate for the adverse effects. We find that up to 2 K of increased temperature production can be maintained at the current level by using new cultivars, selected to maintain current growing period length under warming. Irrigation, as another management strategy, is shown to have the potential to increase yields in dry regions if water is available. However, models do not indicate that irrigation reduces the crops' sensitivity to warming. We find large differences in the yield response to warming and adaptation across climatic regions. While continental and temperate regions may benefit from higher temperatures but also show sizable adaptation potentials, tropical and arid regions show largest temperature impacts and smaller adaptation potentials. After all, these two crop management options appear effective to balance the effects of moderate warming but cannot fully compensate impacts above 2 K of warming. Key Points: Without agronomic adaptation, the dominant effect of temperature increase is to shorten growing periods and to reduce yields and productionAdaptation via cultivars that maintain current growing periods under warming can compensate global production losses up to 2 KIrrigation would act as intensification rather than true adaptation, as it hardly affects the sensitivity of crop yields to warming [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. The GGCMI Phase II experiment: global gridded crop model simulations under uniform changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen levels (protocol version 1.0).
- Author
-
Franke, James, Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Ruane, Alex C., Jagermeyr, Jonas, Balkovic, Juraj, Ciais, Philippe, Dury, Marie, Falloon, Peter, Folberth, Christian, Francois, Louis, Hank, Tobias, Hoffmann, Munir, Izaurralde, R. Cesar, Jacquemin, Ingrid, Jones, Curtis, Khabarov, Nikolay, Koch, Marian, Michelle Li, and Wenfeng Liu
- Subjects
SHIFTING cultivation ,IRRIGATION farming ,CROP yields ,CROPS ,SOIL fertility ,DRY farming - Abstract
Concerns about food security under climate change motivate efforts to better understand future changes in crop yields. Process-based crop models, which represent plant physiological and soil processes, are necessary tools for this purpose since they allow representing future climate and management conditions not sampled in the historical record and new locations to which cultivation may shift. However, process-based crop models differ in many critical details, and their responses to different interacting factors remain only poorly understood. The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) Phase II experiment, an activity of the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP), is designed to provide a systematic parameter sweep focused on climate change factors and their interaction with overall soil fertility, to allow both evaluating model behavior and emulating model responses in impact assessment tools. In this paper we describe the GGCMI Phase II experimental protocol and its simulation data archive. Twelve crop models simulate five crops with systematic uniform perturbations of historical climate, varying CO
2 , temperature, water supply, and applied nitrogen ("CTWN") for rainfed and irrigated agriculture, and a second set of simulations represents a type of adaptation by allowing the adjustment of growing season length. We present some crop yield results to illustrate general characteristics of the simulations and potential uses of the GGCMI Phase II archive. For example, modeled yields show robust decreases to warmer temperatures in almost all regions, with a nonlinear dependence that indicates yields in warmer baseline locations have greater temperature sensitivity. Inter-model uncertainty is qualitatively similar across all the four input dimensions, but is largest in high-latitude regions where crops may be grown in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Parameterization-induced uncertainties and impacts of crop management harmonization in a global gridded crop model ensemble.
- Author
-
Folberth, Christian, Elliott, Joshua, Müller, Christoph, Balkovič, Juraj, Chryssanthacopoulos, James, Izaurralde, Roberto C., Jones, Curtis D., Khabarov, Nikolay, Liu, Wenfeng, Reddy, Ashwan, Schmid, Erwin, Skalský, Rastislav, Yang, Hong, Arneth, Almut, Ciais, Philippe, Deryng, Delphine, Lawrence, Peter J., Olin, Stefan, Pugh, Thomas A. M., and Ruane, Alex C.
- Subjects
- *
CROP management , *SOIL profiles , *PLANT performance , *CROP yields , *CROPS - Abstract
Global gridded crop models (GGCMs) combine agronomic or plant growth models with gridded spatial input data to estimate spatially explicit crop yields and agricultural externalities at the global scale. Differences in GGCM outputs arise from the use of different biophysical models, setups, and input data. GGCM ensembles are frequently employed to bracket uncertainties in impact studies without investigating the causes of divergence in outputs. This study explores differences in maize yield estimates from five GGCMs based on the public domain field-scale model Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) that participate in the AgMIP Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison initiative. Albeit using the same crop model, the GGCMs differ in model version, input data, management assumptions, parameterization, and selection of subroutines affecting crop yield estimates via cultivar distributions, soil attributes, and hydrology among others. The analyses reveal inter-annual yield variability and absolute yield levels in the EPIC-based GGCMs to be highly sensitive to soil parameterization and crop management. All GGCMs show an intermediate performance in reproducing reported yields with a higher skill if a static soil profile is assumed or sufficient plant nutrients are supplied. An in-depth comparison of setup domains for two EPIC-based GGCMs shows that GGCM performance and plant stress responses depend substantially on soil parameters and soil process parameterization, i.e. hydrology and nutrient turnover, indicating that these often neglected domains deserve more scrutiny. For agricultural impact assessments, employing a GGCM ensemble with its widely varying assumptions in setups appears the best solution for coping with uncertainties from lack of comprehensive global data on crop management, cultivar distributions and coefficients for agro-environmental processes. However, the underlying assumptions require systematic specifications to cover representative agricultural systems and environmental conditions. Furthermore, the interlinkage of parameter sensitivity from various domains such as soil parameters, nutrient turnover coefficients, and cultivar specifications highlights that global sensitivity analyses and calibration need to be performed in an integrated manner to avoid bias resulting from disregarded core model domains. Finally, relating evaluations of the EPIC-based GGCMs to a wider ensemble based on individual core models shows that structural differences outweigh in general differences in configurations of GGCMs based on the same model, and that the ensemble mean gains higher skill from the inclusion of structurally different GGCMs. Although the members of the wider ensemble herein do not consider crop-soil-management interactions, their sensitivity to nutrient supply indicates that findings for the EPIC-based sub-ensemble will likely become relevant for other GGCMs with the progressing inclusion of such processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Achieving High Crop Yields with Low Nitrogen Emissions in Global Agricultural Input Intensification.
- Author
-
Liu, Wenfeng, Yang, Hong, Folberth, Christian, Müller, Christoph, Ciais, Philippe, Abbaspour, Karim C., and Schulin, Rainer
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Global patterns of crop yield stability under additional nutrient and water inputs.
- Author
-
Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Ruane, Alex C., Ciais, Philippe, Balkovic, Juraj, Deryng, Delphine, Folberth, Christian, Izaurralde, R. Cesar, Jones, Curtis D., Khabarov, Nikolay, Lawrence, Peter, Liu, Wenfeng, Reddy, Ashwan D., Schmid, Erwin, and Wang, Xuhui
- Subjects
CROP yields ,AGRICULTURAL productivity ,CARBON sequestration ,CARBON in soils ,DEFORESTATION - Abstract
Agricultural production must increase to feed a growing and wealthier population, as well as to satisfy increasing demands for biomaterials and biomass-based energy. At the same time, deforestation and land-use change need to be minimized in order to preserve biodiversity and maintain carbon stores in vegetation and soils. Consequently, agricultural land use needs to be intensified in order to increase food production per unit area of land. Here we use simulations of AgMIP’s Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 to assess implications of input-driven intensification (water, nutrients) on crop yield and yield stability, which is an important aspect in food security. We find region- and crop-specific responses for the simulated period 1980–2009 with broadly increasing yield variability under additional nitrogen inputs and stabilizing yields under additional water inputs (irrigation), reflecting current patterns of water and nutrient limitation. The different models of the GGCMI ensemble show similar response patterns, but model differences warrant further research on management assumptions, such as variety selection and soil management, and inputs as well as on model implementation of different soil and plant processes, such as on heat stress, and parameters. Higher variability in crop productivity under higher fertilizer input will require adequate buffer mechanisms in trade and distribution/storage networks to avoid food price volatility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Time‐Continuous Phosphorus Flows in the Indian Agri‐Food Sector: Long‐Term Drivers and Management Options.
- Author
-
Keil, Leonie, Folberth, Christian, Jedelhauser, Michael, and Binder, Claudia R.
- Subjects
- *
PHOSPHATE fertilizers , *AGRICULTURE , *PHOSPHORUS in soils , *FERTILIZER application , *WASTE recycling - Abstract
Summary: Phosphorus (P) is a major agricultural nutrient and, in its mineable form, a potentially scarce resource. Countries with limited physical access to P should hence develop an effective national P governance. This requires analyses of trends and variations in P flows and stocks over time. Here, we present a long‐term P flow analysis for the Indian agri‐food sector from 1988 to 2011. Major P flows are imports of mineral P, fertilizer application, and uptake of animal fodder. The mineral P import dependency ratio is constant at around 93%. On average, 20% of P inputs to soils are lost through erosion. Key drivers of changes in P flows include population growth, dietary change, and agricultural intensification. To reduce its P fertilizer import dependence, India could, for example, substitute up to 19% of the presently applied mineral P if manure used as a household fuel were recycled, and up to 21% if P was fully recovered from wastewater and household waste. Comparing selected indicators for P use in agriculture with China and the European Union (EU) reveals that there are structural similarities, such as increasing fertilizer application rates and P accumulation in soils, with the first but large differences compared to the latter. The analyses highlight that in contrast to static indicators, the time‐continuous tracking of P flows provides substantial advantages, such as the identification of long‐term trends, drivers, and intervention options for sustainable P management, given that it allows for the interpretation of present indicators in the context of past trends and legacies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Impacts and Uncertainties of +2°C of Climate Change and Soil Degradation on European Crop Calorie Supply.
- Author
-
Balkovič, Juraj, Skalský, Rastislav, Folberth, Christian, Khabarov, Nikolay, Schmid, Erwin, Madaras, Mikuláš, Obersteiner, Michael, and van der Velde, Marijn
- Subjects
CLIMATE change ,SOIL degradation ,GLOBAL warming - Abstract
Abstract: Even if global warming is kept below +2°C, European agriculture will be significantly impacted. Soil degradation may amplify these impacts substantially and thus hamper crop production further. We quantify biophysical consequences and bracket uncertainty of +2°C warming on calories supply from 10 major crops and vulnerability to soil degradation in Europe using crop modeling. The Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model together with regional climate projections from the European branch of the Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (EURO‐CORDEX) was used for this purpose. A robustly positive calorie yield change was estimated for the EU Member States except for some regions in Southern and South‐Eastern Europe. The mean impacts range from +30 Gcal ha
−1 in the north, through +25 and +20 Gcal ha−1 in Western and Eastern Europe, respectively, to +10 Gcal ha−1 in the south if soil degradation and heat impacts are not accounted for. Elevated CO2 and increased temperature are the dominant drivers of the simulated yield changes in high‐input agricultural systems. The growth stimulus due to elevated CO2 may offset potentially negative yield impacts of temperature increase by +2°C in most of Europe. Soil degradation causes a calorie vulnerability ranging from 0 to 50 Gcal ha−1 due to insufficient compensation for nutrient depletion and this might undermine climate benefits in many regions, if not prevented by adaptation measures, especially in Eastern and North‐Eastern Europe. Uncertainties due to future potentials for crop intensification are about 2–50 times higher than climate change impacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Spatially Explicit Assessment of Agricultural Water Equilibrium in the Korean Peninsula.
- Author
-
Lim, Chul-Hee, Choi, Yuyoung, Kim, Moonil, Lee, Soo Jeong, Folberth, Christian, and Lee, Woo-Kyun
- Abstract
In agriculture, balancing water use and retention is an issue dealt with in most regions and for many crops. In this study, we suggest agricultural water equilibrium (AWE) as a new concept that can facilitate a spatially explicit management of agricultural water. This concept is based on the principle of supply and demand of agricultural water, where the virtual water content of crops (VWC) can be defined as the demand, and cropland water budget (CWB) as the supply. For assessing the AWE of the Korean Peninsula, we quantified the CWB based on the hydrological cycle and the VWC of rice, a key crop in the Peninsula. Five factors, namely crop yield, growing season evapotranspiration, annual evapotranspiration, runoff, and annual precipitation, were used to assess the AWE, of which the first four were estimated using the spatially explicit large-scale crop model, Geographical Information System (GIS)-based Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (GEPIC). The CWB and VWC were calculated for a period of three decades, and the AWE was computed by deducting the VWC from the CWB. Our results show a latitudinal difference across the Korean Peninsula. On analyzing the AWE of the major river basins, we found most basins in North Korea showed very low values inferring unsustainable overconsumption of water. The latitudinal difference in AWE is a reflectance of the latitudinal changes in the VWC and CWB. This can be explained by decoupling the demand and supply of agricultural water. Although the AWE values presented in this study were not absolute, the values were sufficient to explain the latitudinal change, and the demand and supply of agricultural water, and establish the usefulness of the indicator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.