1. What are the Major Risk Factors for Nonunion in Pilon Fractures?
- Author
-
Anthony L. Wilson BS, Brandon Boyd, Kyle Cichos, Sudarsan Murali MBA, Alexander K. Mihas, David A. Patch MD, Gerald McGwin, Michael D. Johnson MD, and Clay A. Spitler MD
- Subjects
Orthopedic surgery ,RD701-811 - Abstract
Category: Trauma; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Pilon fractures are difficult injuries to manage as they are typically associated with extensive soft tissue damage. Although staged management of external fixation followed by open reduction and internal fixation is often used to prevent additional soft tissue damage and its associated complications, rates of nonunion remain high in this patient population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and identify factors associated with increased rates of nonunion following operative fixation of pilon fractures. Methods: A retrospective review of all operatively managed pilon fractures at a single level 1 trauma center from 2014 to 2019 was performed. Minimum six-month follow-up was required for inclusion. Patients with skeletal immaturity or amputation prior to definitive fixation were excluded. Patients were grouped based on presence or absence of nonunion, which was defined as lack of bridging bone in at least 3 of 4 cortices and the presence of pain with ambulation at six-month follow-up. Demographics, injury and operative characteristics, and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Among the 279 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 48 developed nonunion at 6-month follow-up (17.2%). Average follow-up was 3.2 years. Patients with nonunion had significantly higher rates of open fractures (50.0% vs. 22.1%, p
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF