Search

A remarkable contribution to the theory of differential equations was made by Adolph Steen in 1874. His results were presented in Danish in a journal containing few articles on mathematics and were wholly ignored by the mathematical community for more than a century. During this time much of his work was rediscovered and extended by numerous authors; in fact the relevant literature embraces five languages in addition to the original Danish and is scattered over correspondingly many countries. In Part I we outline the historical development of Steen's ideas and in Part II we reproduce his pioneering article in an English translation. Though correction of a historical injustice is the primary goal, not everything in his paper has been rediscovered by others. Hence some of the results retain, even at this late date, more than merely historical interest.

The Award Committee – Peter Kritzer, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria and Jan Vybiral, Charles University, Czech Republic – determined that the following paper exhibits exceptional merit and therefore awarded the prize to: Bernd Carl, Aicke Hinrichs, and Philipp Rudolph for their paper ‘‘Entropy numbers of convex hulls in Banach spaces and applications’’, which appeared in October, 2014. Vol. 30, pp. 555–587. The $3000 prize will be divided between the winners. Each author will also receive a plaque.

In a recent paper, Chao-Ping Chen and Feng Qi (2005) established sharp upper and lower bounds for the sequence P n := 1.3 … ( 2 n − 1 ) 2.4 … 2 n P_{n}:=\frac {1.3\ldots (2n-1)}{2.4\ldots 2n} . We show that their result follows easily from a theorem of G. N Watson published in 1959. We also show that the main result of Chen and Qi’s paper is a special case of a more general inequality which admits a very short proof.

We give the asymptotics of the sum \(\sum\nolimits_{x \leqslant n \leqslant x + h} {f(n)}\), where \(h \gg x^{7/12 + \varepsilon }\), for the multiplicative functions \(f(n) = z^{\omega (n)} , z^{\omega (n)} |\mu (n)|, 1/d_k (n)\), and \(nd(n)\).

Zannier proved that for a Laurent series f(x) satisfying the functional equation of type f(x m ) = P(x, f(x)), where \( P(x, y) \in {\Bbb C}(x)[y] \), if f(x) is not rational the set of such m consists of the powers of a single integer. He mentioned that the case f(x) = P(x, f(x m )) should be proved in a similar way. In this paper we first verify this statement and second we show a theorem which is useful for proving the transcendence of a Laurent series satisfying a certain functional equation. This theorem is a generalization of the result that a Laurent series which satisfiesf(x m ) = P(x, f(x)), where\( P(x, y) \in {\Bbb C}(x, y),\,m \geq 2 \)cannot represent an algebraic function unless it is rational (Ke. Nishioka [1], Zannier [8], Section 3).

In [1] Kohli and Vashistha gave an analogue of probabilistic version of Pant‘s Theorem ([2], Theorem 1). We note that mappings defined in Examples 3.6 to 3.8 of [1] are not self maps as claimed in the Definitions 3.1 and 3.2. In this context, we provide some relevant examples to complete the interesting results.

It was proved by Ibukiyama and Skoruppa that the spaces J1,m(l) of Jacobi forms of weight 1, index m and level l vanish if gcd (l,m)=1. We will show that the result holds without the gcd hypothesis.

This is an attachment to a letter of the author to Alexander Zvonkin (dated November 1, 1995). It is reproduced here with the kind permission of the author.

We consider the matrix for the Satake isomorphism with respect to natural bases. We give a simple proof in the case of Chevalley groups that the matrix coefficients which are not obviously zero are in fact positive numbers. We also relate the matrix coefficients to Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials and to Bernstein functions.

Concerns have been voiced about the correctness of certain technical points in DiPerna’s paper (Comm. Math. Phys. 91 (1983), 1–30) related to the vacuum state. In this note, we provide clarifications. Our conclusion is that these concerns mainly arise from the statement of a lemma for constructing the viscous approximate solutions and some typos; however, the gap can be either fixed by correcting the statement of the lemma and the typos or bypassed by employing the finite difference methods. In [Di], DiPerna found a global entropy solution of the isentropic Euler equations for the following exponents in the equation of state for the pressure: γ = 1 + 2/(2m+ 1), m ≥ 2 integer. (1) He divided his arguments into the following two steps. 1. Compactness framework Assume that a sequence of approximate solutions (ρ (x, t),m (x, t)), 0 ≤ t ≤ T , satisfies: (i). There exists a constant C(T ) > 0, independent of > 0, such that 0 ≤ ρ (x, t) ≤ C, |m (x, t)/ρ (x, t)| ≤ C; (ii). For all weak entropy pairs (η, q) of the isentropic Euler equations, the measure sequence η(ρ ,m )t + q(ρ ,m )x is contained in a compact subset of H −1 loc (R× [0, T ]). If γ satisfies (1), then the sequence (ρ (x, t),m (x, t)) is compact in Lloc(R× [0, T ]). The reason for the restriction on the number γ is that, in such a case, any weak entropy function is a polynomial function of the Riemann invariants (w, z). This is the key step in DiPerna’s arguments and is also his main contribution to the compensated compactness method in this aspect. Received by the editors May 16, 1996. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 35K55, 35L65; Secondary 76N15, 35L60, 65M06.

The Award Committee – Michael Gnewuch, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany and Friedrich Pillichshammer, Johannes Kepler University, Austria – determined that the following two papers exhibited exceptional merit and therefore awarded the prize to: ShuTezuka for his paper ‘‘On the discrepancy of generalizedNiederreiter sequences’’, which appeared in June–August, 2013. Vol. 29, pp. 240–247. Joos Heintz, Bart Kuijpers, and Andres Rojas Paredes for their paper ‘‘Software engineering and complexity in effective Algebraic Geometry’’, which appeared in February, 2013. Vol. 29, pp. 92–138. The $3000 prize will be divided between the winners. Each author will also receive a plaque.

We fill a gap in the proof of one of the central theorems in Epp's paper, concerning $p$-cyclic extensions of complete discrete valuation rings., Comment: 3 pages

Let c e IN. For d e ℤ with gcd (d, c) = 1 let δ(d, c) be defined by d · δ(d, c) 1 mod c, 1 ⩽ δ(d, c) ⩽ c. Let s, t e IN with 1 ⩽ s ⩽ c, 1 ⩽ t ⩽ c. The main result is that for arbitrary fixed e > 0, but uniformly over c, s and t Equivalently, the points (d, δ(c,d)) are approximately uniformly distributed in [0, c] × [0, c]: The two-dimensional discrepancy of {(d,δ (c, d)): 1 ⩽ d ⩽ c and (c, d)= 1} in [0,c] × [0,c] is Oe(ce-1/2).

In a preceding paper of Jin and Wang the authors describe computations concerning differential systems of the form x=y, y=-x+a 1 x 2 +a 2 xy+a 3 y 2 +a 4 x x3 +a 5 x 2 y+a 6 xy 2 +a 7 y 3 . We give proofs of the results suggested by these computations and provide a full description of the bifurcation of small-amplitude limit cycles in a subclass of these systemes

We show functoriality of γα in our joint paper with A. Csaszar “Further remarks on δ- and θ-modifications”.

Professor Zbigniew Lipecki from the University of Wroclaw has told me that the definition of “small ball property” introduced in the paper “Metric spaces with the small ball property” by E. Behrends and V. Kadets (Studia Math. 148, No. 3, 275-287, 2001), has been investigated under different names earlier in the literature and that some of the results in this paper and in my paper quoted in the title are rediscoveries of known facts. In particular this applies to Proposition 2.3. I am grateful to Professor Lipecki for providing the following references to us: – Ch. Bandt, Mathematika 28 (1981), 206-210. – R. Duda and R. Telgarsky, Czechoslovak Math. J. 18(93) (1968), 66-82. – E. Szpilrajn-Marczewski, Fund. Math. 15 (1930), 126-27. – E. Szpilrajn-Marczewski, Fund. Math. 22 (1934), 303-311. – B. Tsaban, Real Analysis Exchange 27 (2001/2002), 757-764.

We note that Theorem 5.4 of the paper ``Characteristic cycles of perverse sheaves and Milnor fibers" (by P. Nang and K. Takeuchi, published online in Math. Zeitschrift, October 15, 2004) holds for "any" non-zero complex number $a$., Comment: 1page

Here we give a result on the postulation (i.e. the 2-normality) of nonlinearly normal embeddings of Abelian varieties. This result improves some of the results proved in a recent paper by Ch. Birkenhake.

In this note we point out that a simple proof of the lower bound of the sets (b, c), and so also of Ξ(b, c), defined in the previous paper [1] can be obtained as a simple application of a general method. By Example 4.6 from [2], if [0, 1] = E0⊃E1⊃ … are sets each of which is a finite union of disjoint closed intervals such that each interval of Ek−1, contains at least mk intervals of Ek which are separated by gaps of lengths at least ek, and if mk≥2 and ek≥ek+1>0, then the dimension of the intersection of Ek is at least