Search

Canada is the only Universal Health Insurance country in the OECD without universal insurance for outpatient prescription drugs, a situation generally perceived as unfair and inefficient. In June 2018, the federal government launched an Advisory Council on the Implementation of National Pharmacare, to report in 2019 on the best strategy to implement a national Pharmacare program that would provide all Canadians access to affordable outpatient prescription drugs. The Council was asked to consider three options: a universal public plan for all Canadians; a public catastrophic insurance plan that would kick off once spending on prescription drugs reaches a given threshold; and a more modest patching of existing gaps, providing coverage to those who are not eligible to any form of insurance. Beyond the relative consensus around the ideas that gaps in coverage should be filled to make drugs affordable to all, and that the costs of drugs are too high in Canada, the Council faces the challenge of addressing three underlying issues: 1) what amount of income redistribution will result from each of the three options; 2) how much savings would the implementation of a single payer generate? 3) what role restricting a national formulary would play in achieving those savings, and what would be the political consequences of narrowing the formulary?, (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Aim: To apply six thinking hats technique for decision making in collaborative care., Background: In collaborative partnerships, effective communications need to occur in patient, family, and health care professional meetings. The effectiveness of these meetings depends on the engagement of participants and the quality of the meeting process. The use of six thinking hats technique to engage all participants in effective dialogue is proposed., Design: Discussion paper., Data Sources: Electronic databases, CINAHL, Pub Med, and Science Direct, were searched for years 1990 to 2017., Implications for Nursing: Using six thinking hats technique in patient family meetings nurses can guide a process of dialogue that focuses decision making to build equal care partnerships inclusive of all participants. Nurses will need to develop the skills for using six thinking hats technique and provide support to all participants during the meeting process., Conclusion: Collaborative decision making can be augmented by six thinking hat technique to provide patients, families, and health professionals with opportunities to make informed decisions about care that considers key issues for all involved. Nurses who are most often advocates for patients and their families are in a unique position to lead this initiative in meetings as they network with all health professionals., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

The need for high-quality evidence to support decision making about health and health care by patients, physicians, care providers, and policy-makers is well documented. However, serious shortcomings in evidence persist. Pragmatic clinical trials that use novel techniques including emerging information and communication technologies to explore important research questions rapidly and at a fraction of the cost incurred by more "traditional" research methods promise to help close this gap. Nevertheless, while pragmatic clinical trials can bridge clinical practice and research, they may also raise difficult ethical and regulatory challenges. In this article, the authors briefly survey the current state of evidence that is available to inform clinical care and other health-related decisions and discuss the potential for pragmatic clinical trials to improve this state of affairs. They then propose a new working definition for pragmatic research that centers upon fitness for informing decisions about health and health care. Finally, they introduce a project, jointly undertaken by the National Institutes of Health Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory and the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet), which addresses 11 key aspects of current systems for regulatory and ethical oversight of clinical research that pose challenges to conducting pragmatic clinical trials. In the series of articles commissioned on this topic published in this issue of Clinical Trials, each of these aspects is addressed in a dedicated article, with a special focus on the interplay between ethical and regulatory considerations and pragmatic clinical research aimed at informing "real-world" choices about health and health care., (© The Author(s) 2015.)