Search

Four experiments evaluated the effect of implant dose and release pattern on performance and carcass traits of crossbred beef steers. In Exp. 1, steers (4 to 7 pens/treatment; initial BW = 315 kg) were fed an average of 174 ci. Treatments were 1) no implant (NI); 2) Revalor-S [120 mg of trenbolone acetate (TBA) and 24 mg of estradiol 17f3 (E2); REV-SI; 3) Revalor-IS followed by REV-S (cumulatively 200 mg of TBA and 40 mg of E2 reimplanted at 68 to 74 d; REVIS/S); and 4) Revalor-XS (200 mg of TBA and 40 mg of E2 REV-X), Carcass-adjusted final BW was greater (P < 0.05) for REV-X and REV-IS/S than for REV-S (610, 609, and 598 kg, respectively). Daily DM1 did not differ (P > 0.10) among the 3 implants, but carcassadjusted G:F was greater (P < 0.05) for REV-X and REV-IS/S than for REV-S (0.197 and 0.195 vs. 0.188). Both HCW and LM area were greater (P < 0.05) for REV-X and REV-IS/S than for REV-S. Marbling scores were greatest (P < 0.05) for REV-S and least (P < 0.05) for REV-IS/S; REV-X was intermediate to NI and REV-IS/S. In Exp. 2, steers (10 pens/treatment; initial BW = 391 kg) were fed 131 d, with treatments of REV-S, REV-IS/S (reimplanted at 44 to 47 d), and REV-X. Carcass-adjusted final BW (598 kg), ADG (1.6 kg), DM1 (9.4 kg), G:F (0.17), and HCW did not differ (P > 0.10) among treatments. The percentage of Choice was less (P < 0.05) and percentage of Select greater (P < 0.05) for REV-IS/S than for REV-S and REV-X. In Exp. 3, steers (10 pens/treatment; initial BW = 277 kg) were fed 197 d aud received either REVIS/S (reimplanted at 90 to 103 cI) or REV-X. Carcassadjusted final BW (625 vs. 633 kg) and ADG (1.81 vs. 1.76 kg) were greater (P < 0.05) for REV-X-implantecl steers. Daily DM1 did not differ, but G:F tended (P < 0.10) to be increased and HCW was greater (P < 0.05) for REV-X than for REV-IS/S. In Exp. 4, steers (8 pens/treatment; initial BW = 238 kg) were fed 243 d and received either REV-IS/S (reimplanted at 68 to 71 d) or REV-X. Carcass-adjusted final BW (612 kg), ADG (1.54 kg), DM1 (7.55), and G:F (0.21) did not differ (P > 0.10) for REV-IS/S and REV-X-implanted steers. Carcass traits did not differ among implants, but the percentage of Choice carcasses was greater (P < 0.05) and percentage of Select was less (P < 0.05) for REV-X than for REV-IS/S. These data indicate that when TBA/E2 dose is equal, the altered release rate of REV-X can improve performance and quality grade, but these effects depend on duration of the feeding period and timing of initial and terminal implants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We previously showed that a combined trenbolone acetate (TBA)/estradiol-17β (E2) implant significantly increases IGF-I mRNA levels in the LM of feedlot steers by 28 d after implantation. Here we compare the effects of E2 (25.7 mg), TBA (120 mg), and combined TBA (120 mg)/E2 (24 mg) implants on IGF-I, ICF-I receptor (IGFR-1), estrogen receptor (ER)-α and androgen receptor (AR) mRNA levels in the LM of steers. Twenty yearling crossbred steers with an average initial BW of 421.1 ± 3.6 kg were stratified by BW and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments: 1) nonimplanted, control; 2) implanted with TBA and E2; 3) implanted with E2; or 4) implanted with TBA. Steers were weighed weekly starting on d 0, and muscle biopsy samples were taken from each steer on d 0 (before implantation), 7, 14, and 28. Ribonucleic acid was prepared from each sample and real-time reverse transcription-PCR was used to determine the levels of IGF-I, IGFR-1, ER-α, and AR mRNA. Body weight of implanted steers, adjusted by using d-0 BW as a covariant, tended (P = 0.09) to be greater than that of control steers. On d 7 and 28, IGF-I mRNA levels were greater (58 and 78%, respectively; P < 0.009) in E2-implanted animals than in control steers. Similarly, on d 28 the LM IGF-I mRNA level was 65% greater (P = 0.017) in TBA/E2-implanted steers than in control animals. In contrast, the TBA implant did not increase (P = 0.99) LM IGF-I mRNA levels after 28 d of implantation. Muscle IGFR-1, AR, and ER-α mRNA levels were not different (P > 0.47) in any of the treated groups compared with the control group. These data suggest that E2 is responsible for the increased muscle ICF-I mRNA level observed in steers implanted with a combined TBA/E2 implant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]