Search

Xenotarsonemus brachytegula Lofego, Moraes & Ochoa Xenotarsonemus brachytegula Lofego, Moraes & Ochoa, 2007: 2. Specimens examined: Prados (MG): Campomanesia pubescens, VI-2012 (16 ♀, 5 ♂), XII-2012 (1 ♀, 1 ♂), M. tomentosa, XII-2012 (2 ♀). Previous reports: São Paulo —Natural ecosystems (Cerrado): C. pubescens, Luehea speciosa Willd. (Malvaceae), Olyra sp. (Poaceae) (Lofego et al. 2007); Natural ecosystems (Atlantic Forest): A. klotzschii and T. casaretti (Demite et al. 2013, 2015; cited as A. communis).

Xenotarsonemus spiniphorus Lofego, Moraes & Ochoa Xenotarsonemus spiniphorus Lofego, Moraes & Ochoa, 2007: 11. Specimens examined: Cananéia (SP): Gomidesia sp., VII-2012 (19 ♀, 1 ♂); Blefarocalix salicifolium, I-2013 (2 ♀). Previous reports: São Paulo —Natural ecosystems (Cerrado): Campomanesia pubescens and Myrcia venulosa (Lofego et al. 2007); Natural ecosystems (Atlantic Forest): Trichillia casaretti (Demite et al. 2013) and on plant not mentioned (Demite et al. 2012). Among the 14 species nominally determined in this study, seven of these (F. pulvirosus, M, megassolenidii, T. bilobatus, T. confusus, X. brachytegula, X. cerrado and X. spniphorus) were also found in the Cerrado biome (Lofego & Moraes, 2006; Demite et al. 2009; Rezende et al. 2014). This similarity between the tarsonemids fauna in these two biomes is an unexpected fact, since they are structurally quite different biomes; the Atlantic Forest is a tropical forest, and the Cerrado is a savanna (IBGE 2012). The remaining vegetation of the Atlantic Forest shelters a great diversity of tarsonemids, many still new to science. In the present study, the sampling was only a small portion of the entire diversity of the Atlantic Forest (eight sampling areas, with only five plant species from the same family were sampled at each area) and a considerable richness of tarsonemids species was found. In this study, of the identified species, six (40%) were unknown until recently to science (D. esalqi, K. ochoai, M. caissara, O. dux, X. quiriri, X. scorpius) (Lofego et al. 2015, 2016, 2018, 2019, Rezende et al. 2015b), in addition to the one described here (Tarsonemus conduru Lofego & Cavalcante sp. nov.). A great richness of tarsonemid was also recorded in the Atlantic Forest biome by Demite et al. (2012), in a more restricted area in the interior of the São Paulo state, but with a larger sampling, where 100 plant species from several botanical families were collected in 18 areas. In that study, Tarsonemidae was the second family with the highest richness (47 species). The data from the present study reveal the impressive richness of the family Tarsonemidae in the Atlantic Forest; and indicate how much further efforts are needed to better understand the diversity in this hotspot.

Xenotarsonemus scorpius Lofego, Cavalcante & Demite Xenotarsonemus scorpius Lofego, Cavalcante & Demite, 2018: 274. Specimens examined: Uruçuca (BA): Marlierea obversa D. Legrand, V-2012 (1 ♀), Myrciaria floribunda Miq., V-2012 (4 ♀, 8 ♂), III-2013 (4 ♀, 2 ♂). Previous reports: This material is the same used in the species description by Lofego et al. (2018).

Xenotarsonemus brachytegula Lofego, Moraes & Ochoa Xenotarsonemus brachytegula Lofego, Moraes & Ochoa, 2007: 2. Specimens examined: Prados (MG): Campomanesia pubescens, VI-2012 (16 ♀, 5 ♂), XII-2012 (1 ♀, 1 ♂), M. tomentosa, XII-2012 (2 ♀). Previous reports: São Paulo —Natural ecosystems (Cerrado): C. pubescens, Luehea speciosa Willd. (Malvaceae), Olyra sp. (Poaceae) (Lofego et al. 2007); Natural ecosystems (Atlantic Forest): A. klotzschii and T. casaretti (Demite et al. 2013, 2015; cited as A. communis)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 164, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["Lofego, A. C., Moraes, G. J. de & Ochoa, R. (2007) Four new species of Xenotarsonemus (Acari: Tarsonemidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa, 1646 (1), 1 - 15. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 1646.1.1","Demite, P. R., Lofego, A. C. & Feres, R. J. F. (2013) Mite (Acari; Arachnida) diversity of two native plants in fragments of a semideciduous seasonal forest in Brazil. Systematics and Biodiversity, 11 (2), 141 - 148. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 14772000.2013.806368"]}

Xenotarsonemus quiriri Lofego, Cavalcante & Demite Xenotarsonemus quiriri Lofego, Cavalcante & Demite, 2018: 271. Specimens examined: Garuva (SC): Myrtaceae sp.1, V-2012 (5 ♀). Previous reports: This material is the same used in the species description by Lofego et al. (2018)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 165, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["Lofego, A. C., Cavalcante, A. C. C. & Demite, P. R. (2018) Two new species of Xenotarsonemus (Acari: Tarsonemidae) from the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology, 47 (2), 271 - 280. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 13744 - 017 - 0556 - 5"]}

Metatarsonemus caissara Lofego & Cavalcante Metatarsonemus caissara Lofego & Cavalcante in Lofego et al., 2019: 314. Specimens examined: Cananéia (SP): Eugenia astringens Cambess, I-2013 (2 ♀, 2 ♂). Previous reports: This material is the same used in the species description by Lofego et al. (2019)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 158, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["Lofego, A. C., Cavalcante, A. C. C., Demite, P. R., Rezende, J. M., Ochoa, R. & Moraes, G. J. de (2019) Reinstatement of Metatarsonemus Attiah (Acari: Tarsonemidae), with description of a new species, redefinition of the genus and a key to the world species. Zootaxa, 4711 (2), 307 - 329. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4711.2.5"]}

Ochoanemus dux Lofego, Pitton & Rezende Ochoanemus dux Lofego, Pitton & Rezende, 2016: 313. Specimens examined: Cananéia (SP): Psidium cattleyanum Sabine, VII-2012 (11 ♀, 7 ♂). Previous reports: This material is the same used in the species description by Lofego et al. (2016)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 159, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["Pitton, T., Lofego, A. C. & Rezende, J. M. (2016) Three new species of Xenotarsonemus (Acari: Tarsonemidae) from the northwestern region of Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Zootaxa, 4138 (3), 534 - 548. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4138.3.8","Lofego, A. C., Pitton, T. & Rezende, J. M. (2016) A new genus and new species of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata) from the Brazilian rainforests. Systematic & Applied Acarology, 21 (3), 307 - 319. https: // doi. org / 10.11158 / saa. 21.3.6"]}

Tarsonemus conduru Lofego & Cavalcante sp. nov. (Figures 2–8) Diagnosis: Female—Gnatosomal capsule wider than long; pharynx fusiform. Median lobes on the posterior margin of the prodorsal shield, setae v1, sc2 and c2 with similar length, varying between 10–16 μm; short setae on shields C, D, EF and H (less than 12 μm). Prosternal apodeme conspicuous, almost reaching sejugal apodeme but nor fused with it. Sejugal apodeme arched, conspicuous in most of its extension but diffuse in the middle. Poststernal apodeme conspicuous bifurcated anteriorly. Specimens examined: Holotype ♀: Serra do Conduru, Uruçuca, Bahia state, Brazil (14°29’S; 39°08’W), on Marlierea obversa D. Legrand (Myrtaceae), 5 May 2012, deposited at Departamento de Zoologia e Botânica, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil. Paratypes: 1 ♀: same locality and date as holotype, on Myrciaria sp. (Myrtaceae), deposited at Departamento de Zoologia e Botânica, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil; 1 ♀: same locality as holotype, on Myrciaria floribunda (H.West ex Willd.)O.Berg(Myrtaceae), 16 March2013, deposited at Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” (ESALQ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, São Paulo state, Brazil. All specimens collected by P.R. Demite. Description of female: three specimens measured Gnathosoma (Figure 3): subquadrangular in dorsal view, length 22 23 (22–25); maximum width 28 29 (28–30), dorsal apodeme distinct. Setae dgs 10 10 and vgs 5 5 (5–6) smooth; seta pp not observed. Palpus short, with one visible small subterminal setae and a terminal cone-shaped structure. Pharynx fusiform, 13 12 (12–13) long and 6 5 (5–6) wide at widest region. Idiosoma (Figures 3 and 4): length 145 148 (145–150), width at level of c1 98 101 (98–106); prodorsal shield covering at least three quarters of the gnathosoma. Stigma on lateral of prodorsal shield, prominent, posterolaterad of v1. Posteromedian margin of prodorsal shield with five subcircular lobes. Lengths of the setae: v1 15 14 (12–16), sc1 12 12 (11–12), sc2 12 12 (10–13), c1 5 5, c2 12 12 (11–14), d 7 7 (7–8), e 7 9 (9–10), f 10 11 (10–12), h 9 10 (9–11). Setae v1, sc2, c1, c2, d, e; f and h serrate; all these setiform; sc1 capitate and with tiny spines. Distances between dorsal setae: v1–v1 27 26 (23–28), sc1–sc1 37 38 (37–40); sc2–sc2 49 49 (47–51), v1–sc2 20 20 (20–21), c1–c1 44 44 (42–45), c2–c2 76 78 (76–81), c1–c2 29 30 (29–31), d–d 32 30 (26–33), f–f 18 16 (13–18), e–f 16 18 (16–20), h–h 18 20 (18–23). Seta sc1 inserted at same level or slightly posteriad of sc2. Coxisternal seta 1a 3 4 (3–4), near the middle of apodeme 1 (ap1); 2a 7 6 (5–7), adjacent to the middle of apodeme 2 (ap2); 3a 5 5 (4–5), adjacent to the anterior end of apodeme 3 (ap3); 3b 4 5 (4–5), by distal end of apodeme IV. Seta ps 2 2. Prosternal apodeme (appr) conspicuous, almost reaching sejugal apodeme but nor fused with it. Apodeme 1 conspicuous, fused to anterior end of prosternal apodeme, extending diagonally to base of anterior margin of trochanter I. Apodeme 2 almost reaching prosternal apodeme. Sejugal apodeme (apsej) arched, conspicuous in most of its extension but diffuse in the middle. Apodeme 3 extending diagonally from proximity of insertion of seta 3a to anterior margin of trochanter III; apodeme 4 (ap4) extending diagonally from the middle of anterior half of the poststernal apodeme (appo) to insertion of seta 3b. Proximal half of apodeme 4 diffused while the distal half conspicuous. Poststernal apodeme conspicuous, bifurcated anteriorly. Ventral plates slightly punctate. Tegula rounded, 4 4 (3–5) long and 9 9 (8–9) wide. All ventral setae smooth. Legs (Figures 5–8): lengths (femur to tarsus): leg I 37 38 (37–38), leg II 42 40 (37–42), leg III 40 41 (39–44), leg IV 25 26 (25–27). Number of setae (solenidia in parentheses) on femur, genu, tibia and tarsus, respectively: leg I: 4-4-6(2)+8(1), leg II: 3-3-4-6(1), leg III: 1+3-4-4. Tarsal solenidion ω of tibiotarsus I 5 6 (5–7), stout, slightly narrower near base. Sensory cluster of tibia I complete, solenidion φ1 2 2, capitate; φ2 2 2, clavate; famulus k 3 3 (3–4), all those inserted at approximately the same level. Seta d of tibia I 30 35 (30–40), slightly serrate. Solenidion ω of tarsus II proximal, 4 4 (4–5), stout, narrower basally; seta pl´´ 3 3 (3–4), spine-like. Seta d of tibia II 7 7 (7–8), smooth. Femorogenu IV 18 20 (18–21); tibiotarsus IV 6 6. Length of leg IV setae: v´F 5 6 (5–6), v´G 7 7, v´Ti 17 20 (17–22) and tc´´ 19 21 (19–23); setae v´F, v´G and tc´´ smooth; v´Ti serrate. Differential diagnosis: The new species resembles Tarsonemus stammeri Schaarschmidt in having median lobes on the posterior margin of the prodorsal shield and short setae on shields C, D, EF and H (less than 20 µm). However, that species differs from the new species here described by the elongate pharynx, sejugal apodeme well sclerotized throughout, prosternal apodema sclerotized only anteriad of apodeme 2, and dorsal seta d about 20 μm long. Remarks: Nothing is known about the biology or ecology of this new species. Larva and Male: Unknown Etymology: The specific designation refers to the type locality “Serra do Conduru” (Conduru ridge)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on pages 159-164, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003

Xenotarsonemus quiriri Lofego, Cavalcante & Demite Xenotarsonemus quiriri Lofego, Cavalcante & Demite, 2018: 271. Specimens examined: Garuva (SC): Myrtaceae sp.1, V-2012 (5 ♀). Previous reports: This material is the same used in the species description by Lofego et al. (2018).

Fungitarsonemus lodici (De Leon) Hemitarsonemus lodici De Leon, 1956: 110. Fungitarsonemus lodici.— Lindquist, 1986: 307. Specimens examined: Uruçuca (BA): Myrcia obvesa (D. Legrand) E. Lucas & C.E. Wilson, V-2012 (1 ♀); Garuva (SC): Myrtaceae sp.5, IV-2013 (1 ♀); Lajeado/Teutônia (RS): Eugenia rostrifolia D. Legrand, IV-2012 (4 ♀♀), XII-2012 (1 ♀); M. plinioides XII-2012 (1 ♀). Previous reports: Alagoas —Natural ecosystems (Atlantic Forest): Cupania oblongifolia Mart. (Sapindaceae) (Duarte et al. 2015)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 158, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["De Leon, D. (1956) Four new Acarina in the family Tarsonemidae. Florida Entomologist, 39 (3), 105 - 112. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 3492424","Lindquist, E. E. (1986) The world genera of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata): a morphological, phylogenetic, and systematic revision, with a reclassification of family-group taxa in the Heterostigamata. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 136, 1 - 517.","Duarte, M. E., Navia, D., Santos, L. R., Rideiqui, P. J. S. & Silva, E. S. (2015) Mites associated with sugarcane crop and with native trees from adjacent Atlantic forest fragment in Brazil. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 66, 529 - 540. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 10493 - 015 - 9922 - 3"]}

Kaliszewskia ochoai Lofego, Demite & Moraes Kaliszewskia ochoai Lofego, Demite & Moraes, 2015: 563. Specimens examined: Uruçuca (BA): Plinia sp., III-2013 (1 ♀); Cananéia (SP): Blepharocalyx salicifolius (Kunth) O. Berg, VII-2012 (2 ♀). Previous reports: This material is the same used in the species description by Lofego et al. (2015)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 158, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["Lofego, A. C., Demite, P. R. & Moraes, G. J. de (2015) A new genus and species of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata) from the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Zootaxa, 986, 561 - 568."]}

Tarsonemus confusus Ewing Tarsonemus confusus Ewing, 1939: 26. Specimens examined: Prados (MG): Myrcia tomentosa (Aubl.) DC., VI-2012 (1 ♀); Lajeado/Teutônia (RS): Calyptranthes tricona D. Legrand, IV-2012 (3 ♀♀), XII-2012 (1 ♀), Myrciaria plinioides, IV-2012 (1 ♀), XII-2012 (1 ♀). Previous reports: Amazonas —Agroecosystems: Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck (Rutaceae); Distrito Federal— Natural ecosystems (Cerrado): undetermined plant (Rezende et al. 2014); Goiás —Agroecosystems: Glycine max (Rezende et al. 2014); Natural ecosystems (Cerrado): undetermined plant (Rezende et al. 2014); Mato Grosso —Agroecosystems: Hevea brasiliensis (Demite & Feres 2008); Natural ecosystems: Bauhinia longifolia (Bong.) Steud. (Fabaceae), Qualea sp. (Vochysiaceae), and on an unidentified Myrtaceae (Demite et al. 2009); Minas Gerais —Agroecosystems: G. max (Rezende et al. 2014); Pará —Agroecosystems: Annona muricata L. (Annonaceae); São Paulo —Agroecosystems: Citrus sp. (Rutaceae) and Saccharum sp. (Poaceae) (Demite et al. 2015), H. brasiliensis (Bellini et al. 2015); Natural ecosystems (Cerrado): Campomanesia pubescens, Myrcia guianensis, Myrcia venulosa, Psidium australe Cambess. (Myrtaceae), P. guajava, Psidium guineense Sw. (Myrtaceae) (Lofego et al. 2005, Lofego & Moraes 2006); Natural ecosystems (Atlantic Forest): A. klotzschii, T. casaretti (Demite et al. 2013; cited as A. communis) and Lantana fucata Lindl. (Verbenaceae) (Feres et al. 2005; cited as Lantana lilacina). and on unidentified plant (Demite et al. 2012); Tocantins —Agroecosystems: Calopogonium mucunoide Desv. (Fabaceae), H. guazumifolia (Malvaceae), Sida urens L. (Malvaceae) and Waltheria indica L., cited as Waltheria americana (Malvaceae) (Cruz et al. 2012)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 164, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["Ewing, H. E. (1939) A revision of the mites of the Subfamily Tarsoneminae of North America, the West Indies and the Hawaiian Islands. United States Department of Agricultural Technical Bulletin, 653, 1 - 64.","Rezende, J. M., Lofego, A. C., Nuvoloni, F. M. & Navia, D. (2014) Mites from Cerrado fragments and adjacent soybean crops: does the native vegetation help or harm the plantation? Experimental and Applied Acarology, 64 (4), 501 - 518. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 10493 - 014 - 9844 - 5","Demite, P. R. & Feres, R. J. F. (2008) Influencia de fragmentos de Cerrado na distribuicao de acaros em seringal. Neotropical Entomology, 37 (2), 196 - 204. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / S 1519 - 566 X 2008000200015","Demite, P. R., Feres, R. J. F., Lofego, A. C. & Oliveira, A. R. (2009) Plant inhabiting mites (Acari) from the Cerrado biome of Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Zootaxa, 2061 (1), 45 - 60. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 2061.1.3","Demite, P. R., Feres, R. J. F. & Lofego, A. C. (2015) Influence of agricultural environment on the plant mite community in forest fragments. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 75 (2), 396 - 404. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / 1519 - 6984.14913","Lofego, A. C., Ochoa, R. & Moraes, G. J. de (2005) Some tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) from the Brazilian \" Cerrado \" vegetation, with descriptions of three new species. Zootaxa, 823 (1), 1 - 27. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 823.1.1","Demite, P. R., Lofego, A. C. & Feres, R. J. F. (2013) Mite (Acari; Arachnida) diversity of two native plants in fragments of a semideciduous seasonal forest in Brazil. Systematics and Biodiversity, 11 (2), 141 - 148. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 14772000.2013.806368","Feres, R. J. F., Lofego, A. C. & Oliveira, A. R. (2005) Acaros planticolas (Acari) da \" Estacao Ecologica do Noroeste Paulista \", Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica, 5 (1), 43 - 56. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / S 1676 - 06032005000100005","Demite, P. R., Lofego, A. C. & Feres, R. J. F. (2012) Acarofauna de fragmentos florestais remanescentes na regiao noroeste do estado de Sao Paulo. In: Nechi Junior, O. N. (Ed.), Fauna e flora de fragmentos florestais remanescentes da regiao noroeste do estado de Sao Paulo. Editora Holos, Ribeirao Preto, pp. 167 - 179.","Cruz, W. P. da, Sarmento, R. A., Teodoro, A. V., Erasmo, E. A. L., Pedro Neto, M., Ignacio, M. & Ferreira Junior, D. F. (2012) Acarofauna em cultivo de pinhao-manso e plantas espontaneas associadas. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasilseira, 47 (3), 319 - 327. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / S 0100 - 204 X 2012000300002"]}

Metatarsonemus megasolenidii Lofego & Ochoa Metatarsonemus megasolenidii Lofego & Ochoa in Lofego et al., 2005: 7. Specimens examined: Gália (SP): Campomanesia guazumifolia (Cambess.) O. Berg., VI-2012 (1 ♀); Sete Barras (SP): Eugenia melanogyna (D.Legrand) Sobral; VI-2012 (2 ♀); Eugenia mosenii (Kausel) Sobral, VI-2012 (3 ♀); Myrcia neosuaveolens E. Lucas & C.E. Wilson, VI-2012 (1 ♀); Myrcia flagellaris (D. Legrand) Sobral, VI-2012 (1 ♀); Cananéia (SP): Myrcia multiflora (Lam.) DC., VI-2012 (1 ♀); Prados (MG): M. splendens, XII-2012 (1 ♀). Previous reports: Goiás —Natural ecosystems (Cerrado) undetermined plant (Rezende et al. 2014); São Paulo —Natural ecosystems (Cerrado): Campomanesia pubescens (Mart. ex DC.) O.Berg (Myrtaceae), Myrcia guianensis (Aubl.) DC. (Myrtaceae) and Myrcia venulosa DC. (Myrtaceae) (Lofego et al. 2005, Lofego & Moraes 2006); Natural ecosystems (Atlantic Forest): Acalypha diversifolia Jacq. (Euphorbiaceae) (Buosi et al. 2006, Feres et al. 2007), Alchornea glandulosa Poepp. (Euphorbiaceae) (Buosi et al. 2006, Feres et al. 2007) and Actinostemom klotzschii (Buosi et al. 2006, Feres et al. 2007, Demite et al. 2013; cited as A. communis)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 159, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["Lofego, A. C., Ochoa, R. & Moraes, G. J. de (2005) Some tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) from the Brazilian \" Cerrado \" vegetation, with descriptions of three new species. Zootaxa, 823 (1), 1 - 27. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 823.1.1","Rezende, J. M., Lofego, A. C., Nuvoloni, F. M. & Navia, D. (2014) Mites from Cerrado fragments and adjacent soybean crops: does the native vegetation help or harm the plantation? Experimental and Applied Acarology, 64 (4), 501 - 518. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 10493 - 014 - 9844 - 5","Buosi, R., Feres, R. J. F., Oliveira, A. R., Lofego, A. C. & Hernandes, F. A. (2006) Acaros planticolas (Acari) da \" Estacao Ecologica de Paulo de Faria \", Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica, 6, 1 - 20. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / S 1676 - 06032006000100009","Feres, R. J. F., Buosi, R., Daud, R. D. & Demite, P. R. (2007) Padroes ecologicos da comunidade de acaros em euforbiaceas de um fragmento de Mata Estacional Semidecidual, no Estado de Sao Paulo. Biota Neotropica, 7, 1 - 10. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / S 1676 - 06032007000200022","Demite, P. R., Lofego, A. C. & Feres, R. J. F. (2013) Mite (Acari; Arachnida) diversity of two native plants in fragments of a semideciduous seasonal forest in Brazil. Systematics and Biodiversity, 11 (2), 141 - 148. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 14772000.2013.806368"]}

Xenotarsonemus scorpius Lofego, Cavalcante & Demite Xenotarsonemus scorpius Lofego, Cavalcante & Demite, 2018: 274. Specimens examined: Uruçuca (BA): Marlierea obversa D. Legrand, V-2012 (1 ♀), Myrciaria floribunda Miq., V-2012 (4 ♀, 8 ♂), III-2013 (4 ♀, 2 ♂). Previous reports: This material is the same used in the species description by Lofego et al. (2018)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 165, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["Lofego, A. C., Cavalcante, A. C. C. & Demite, P. R. (2018) Two new species of Xenotarsonemus (Acari: Tarsonemidae) from the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology, 47 (2), 271 - 280. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 13744 - 017 - 0556 - 5"]}

Xenotarsonemus spiniphorus Lofego, Moraes & Ochoa Xenotarsonemus spiniphorus Lofego, Moraes & Ochoa, 2007: 11. Specimens examined: Cananéia (SP): Gomidesia sp., VII-2012 (19 ♀, 1 ♂); Blefarocalix salicifolium, I-2013 (2 ♀). Previous reports: São Paulo —Natural ecosystems (Cerrado): Campomanesia pubescens and Myrcia venulosa (Lofego et al. 2007); Natural ecosystems (Atlantic Forest): Trichillia casaretti (Demite et al. 2013) and on plant not mentioned (Demite et al. 2012). Among the 14 species nominally determined in this study, seven of these (F. pulvirosus, M, megassolenidii, T. bilobatus, T. confusus, X. brachytegula, X. cerrado and X. spniphorus) were also found in the Cerrado biome (Lofego & Moraes, 2006; Demite et al. 2009; Rezende et al. 2014). This similarity between the tarsonemids fauna in these two biomes is an unexpected fact, since they are structurally quite different biomes; the Atlantic Forest is a tropical forest, and the Cerrado is a savanna (IBGE 2012). The remaining vegetation of the Atlantic Forest shelters a great diversity of tarsonemids, many still new to science. In the present study, the sampling was only a small portion of the entire diversity of the Atlantic Forest (eight sampling areas, with only five plant species from the same family were sampled at each area) and a considerable richness of tarsonemids species was found. In this study, of the identified species, six (40%) were unknown until recently to science (D. esalqi, K. ochoai, M. caissara, O. dux, X. quiriri, X. scorpius) (Lofego et al. 2015, 2016, 2018, 2019, Rezende et al. 2015b), in addition to the one described here (Tarsonemus conduru Lofego & Cavalcante sp. nov.). A great richness of tarsonemid was also recorded in the Atlantic Forest biome by Demite et al. (2012), in a more restricted area in the interior of the São Paulo state, but with a larger sampling, where 100 plant species from several botanical families were collected in 18 areas. In that study, Tarsonemidae was the second family with the highest richness (47 species). The data from the present study reveal the impressive richness of the family Tarsonemidae in the Atlantic Forest; and indicate how much further efforts are needed to better understand the diversity in this hotspot., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 165, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["Lofego, A. C., Moraes, G. J. de & Ochoa, R. (2007) Four new species of Xenotarsonemus (Acari: Tarsonemidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa, 1646 (1), 1 - 15. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 1646.1.1","Demite, P. R., Lofego, A. C. & Feres, R. J. F. (2013) Mite (Acari; Arachnida) diversity of two native plants in fragments of a semideciduous seasonal forest in Brazil. Systematics and Biodiversity, 11 (2), 141 - 148. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 14772000.2013.806368","Demite, P. R., Lofego, A. C. & Feres, R. J. F. (2012) Acarofauna de fragmentos florestais remanescentes na regiao noroeste do estado de Sao Paulo. In: Nechi Junior, O. N. (Ed.), Fauna e flora de fragmentos florestais remanescentes da regiao noroeste do estado de Sao Paulo. Editora Holos, Ribeirao Preto, pp. 167 - 179.","Demite, P. R., Feres, R. J. F., Lofego, A. C. & Oliveira, A. R. (2009) Plant inhabiting mites (Acari) from the Cerrado biome of Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Zootaxa, 2061 (1), 45 - 60. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 2061.1.3","Rezende, J. M., Lofego, A. C., Nuvoloni, F. M. & Navia, D. (2014) Mites from Cerrado fragments and adjacent soybean crops: does the native vegetation help or harm the plantation? Experimental and Applied Acarology, 64 (4), 501 - 518. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 10493 - 014 - 9844 - 5","IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica) (2012) Manual tecnico da vegetacao brasileira: sistema fitogeografico, inventario das informacoes florestais e campestres, tecnicas e manejo de colecoes botanicas, procedimentos para mapeamentos. Coordenacao de Recursos Naturais e Estudos Ambientais, Rio de Janeiro, 276 p.","Lofego, A. C., Demite, P. R. & Moraes, G. J. de (2015) A new genus and species of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata) from the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Zootaxa, 986, 561 - 568.","Rezende, J. M., Lofego, A. C. & Ochoa, R. (2015 b) Two new species of Daidalotarsonemus (Acari: Prostigmata: Tarsonemidae) from Brazil. Acarologia, 55 (4), 435 - 448."]}

Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R., De Moraes, Gilberto J. (2022): Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago. Zootaxa 5094 (1): 153-168, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6

Xenotarsonemus cerrado Lofego, Moraes & Ochoa Xenotarsonemus cerrado Lofego, Moraes & Ochoa, 2007: 2. Specimens examined: Prados (MG): Campomanesia pubescens, VI-2012 (2 ♀). Previous reports: São Paulo —Natural ecosystems (Cerrado): C. pubescens and Desmodium incanum (Lofego et al. 2007); Natural ecosystems (Atlantic Forest): plant not mentioned (Demite et al. 2012)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 165, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["Lofego, A. C., Moraes, G. J. de & Ochoa, R. (2007) Four new species of Xenotarsonemus (Acari: Tarsonemidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa, 1646 (1), 1 - 15. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 1646.1.1","Demite, P. R., Lofego, A. C. & Feres, R. J. F. (2012) Acarofauna de fragmentos florestais remanescentes na regiao noroeste do estado de Sao Paulo. In: Nechi Junior, O. N. (Ed.), Fauna e flora de fragmentos florestais remanescentes da regiao noroeste do estado de Sao Paulo. Editora Holos, Ribeirao Preto, pp. 167 - 179."]}

Tarsonemus bilobatus Suski Tarsonemus bilobatus Suski, 1965: 539. Specimens examined: Prados (MG): Campomanesia pubescens (Mart. ex DC.) O.Berg, VI-2012 (2 ♀). Previous reports: Goiás —Agroecosystems: Glycine max (L.) Merr., Fabaceae (Rezende et al. 2014); Minas Gerais —Agroecosystems: G. max (Rezende et al. 2015b); São Paulo —Natural ecosystems (Cerrado): C. pubescens and Psidium guajava L. (Myrtaceae) (Lofego et al. 2005, Lofego & Moraes); Natural ecosystems (Atlantic Forest): Alchornea glandulosa and Desmodium incanum (Sw.) DC. (Fabaceae) (Feres et al. 2005; cited as Desmodium canun) and on unidentified plants (Demite et al. 2012); Tocantins —Agroecosystems: Jatropha curcas L., Euphorbiaceae, Helicteres guazumifolia Kunth (Malvaceae), Senna obtusifolia H.S.Irwin & Barneby (Fabaceae), Sida cordifolia L. (Malvaceae), Sida rhombifolia L. (Malvaceae) (Cruz et al. 2012)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 159, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["Suski, Z. W. (1965) Tarsonemid mites on apple trees in Poland. II. Tarsonemus bilobatus n. sp. (Acarina tarsonemidae). Bulletin de Liacademie Polonaise des Sciences, C 1, V, Serie des sciences biologiques, 13 (9), 539 - 544.","Rezende, J. M., Lofego, A. C., Nuvoloni, F. M. & Navia, D. (2014) Mites from Cerrado fragments and adjacent soybean crops: does the native vegetation help or harm the plantation? Experimental and Applied Acarology, 64 (4), 501 - 518. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 10493 - 014 - 9844 - 5","Rezende, J. M., Lofego, A. C. & Ochoa, R. (2015 b) Two new species of Daidalotarsonemus (Acari: Prostigmata: Tarsonemidae) from Brazil. Acarologia, 55 (4), 435 - 448.","Lofego, A. C., Ochoa, R. & Moraes, G. J. de (2005) Some tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) from the Brazilian \" Cerrado \" vegetation, with descriptions of three new species. Zootaxa, 823 (1), 1 - 27. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 823.1.1","Feres, R. J. F., Lofego, A. C. & Oliveira, A. R. (2005) Acaros planticolas (Acari) da \" Estacao Ecologica do Noroeste Paulista \", Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica, 5 (1), 43 - 56. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / S 1676 - 06032005000100005","Demite, P. R., Lofego, A. C. & Feres, R. J. F. (2012) Acarofauna de fragmentos florestais remanescentes na regiao noroeste do estado de Sao Paulo. In: Nechi Junior, O. N. (Ed.), Fauna e flora de fragmentos florestais remanescentes da regiao noroeste do estado de Sao Paulo. Editora Holos, Ribeirao Preto, pp. 167 - 179.","Cruz, W. P. da, Sarmento, R. A., Teodoro, A. V., Erasmo, E. A. L., Pedro Neto, M., Ignacio, M. & Ferreira Junior, D. F. (2012) Acarofauna em cultivo de pinhao-manso e plantas espontaneas associadas. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasilseira, 47 (3), 319 - 327. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / S 0100 - 204 X 2012000300002"]}

Daidalotarsonemus esalqi Rezende, Lofego & Ochoa Daidalotarsonemus esalqi Rezende, Lofego & Ochoa, 2015b: 436. Specimens examined: Lajeado (RS): Myrciaria plinioides D. Legrand, XII-2012 (1 ♀). Previous reports: Bahia —Agroecosystem: Theobroma cacao L. (Malvaceae) and Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. (Moraceae) (Souza et al. 2018); São Paulo —Urban ecosystems: Hevea brasiliensis (Wild. ex A.Juss) Müll. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) (Rezende et al. 2015b)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 158, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["Rezende, J. M., Lofego, A. C. & Ochoa, R. (2015 b) Two new species of Daidalotarsonemus (Acari: Prostigmata: Tarsonemidae) from Brazil. Acarologia, 55 (4), 435 - 448."]}

Fungitarsonemus pulvirosus Attiah Fungitarsonemus pulvirosus Attiah, 1970: 193. Specimens examined: Prados (MG): Myrcia splendens (Sw.) DC., XII-2012 (1 ♀); Garuva (SC): Myrtaceae sp.5, IV-2013 (1 ♀). Previous reports: Goiás —Natural Ecosystems (Cerrado): undetermined plants (Rezende et al. 2014); São Paulo —Agroecosystems: Citrus sp. (Rutaceae) (Demite et al. 2015); Natural Ecosystems (Atlantic Forest): Actinostemom klotzschii (Didr.) Pax (Euphorbiaceae) (Demite et al. 2015; cited as A. communis), Trichilia casaretti (Meliaceae) (Demite et al. 2013)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cavalcante, Ana C. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Rodrigues, Ricardo R. & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2022, Tarsonemid mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on myrtaceous plants of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, with description of a new species of Tarsonemus Canestrini & Fanzago, pp. 153-168 in Zootaxa 5094 (1) on page 158, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/5965003, {"references":["Attiah, H. H. (1970) New tarsonemid mites associated with citrus in Florida (Acarina: Tarsonemidae). Florida Entomologist, 53 (4), 179 - 201. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 3493188","Rezende, J. M., Lofego, A. C., Nuvoloni, F. M. & Navia, D. (2014) Mites from Cerrado fragments and adjacent soybean crops: does the native vegetation help or harm the plantation? Experimental and Applied Acarology, 64 (4), 501 - 518. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 10493 - 014 - 9844 - 5","Demite, P. R., Feres, R. J. F. & Lofego, A. C. (2015) Influence of agricultural environment on the plant mite community in forest fragments. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 75 (2), 396 - 404. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / 1519 - 6984.14913","Demite, P. R., Lofego, A. C. & Feres, R. J. F. (2013) Mite (Acari; Arachnida) diversity of two native plants in fragments of a semideciduous seasonal forest in Brazil. Systematics and Biodiversity, 11 (2), 141 - 148. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 14772000.2013.806368"]}

Honduriella mcmurtryi Demite n. sp. Diagnosis. Females with dorsal shield smooth except for lateral striae anteriad of S2; all dorsal setae smooth, except Z4 and Z5, lightly serrate; with s4 longer than Z4 and Z5. Sternal and genital shields lightly reticulate over most of their extent, smooth centrally; with a pair of prominent pores on a lightly sclerotised and curved plate between JV2 setae, apparently a remnant of the ventral shield; anal shield smooth, pyriform. Calyx cup-shaped. Macrosetae smooth and sharp-tipped, present on genua of all legs, tibiae of legs III and IV and tarsus of leg IV. Description. Female (n= 8). Dorsum (Fig. 5): dorsal shield smooth, except for lateral striae anteriad of S2, 415 419 (405–435) long, 262 263 (250–275) wide at level of s4; with 15 pairs of lyrifissures (poroids) and seven pairs of pores (solenostomes). Setal lengths: j1 38 38 (34–41), j 3 14 14 (12–16), j 4 11 11 (10–11), j5 9 9 (8–10), j 6 10 8 (7–10), J 2 11 10 (9–11), J5 9 8 (7–9), z 2 13 13 (12–15), z 4 21 20 (19–21), z5 8 9 (8–9), Z 1 9 10 (8–11), Z4 125 121 (112–128), Z5 93 93 (85–110), s4 150 159 (145–170), S 2 15 15 (13–16), S 4 15 15 (11–18), S 5 10 10 (9–11), r3 58 57 (54–60), R 1 22 23 (21–26). Venter (Fig. 6): sternal shield with three pairs of setae and two pairs of lyrifissures; distances between st1–st3 77 80 (77–82), st2–st2 92 89 (85–94); distance between st5–st5 77 70 (66–77). Genital shield rounded behind st 5. A pair of prominent pores present on a lightly sclerotised and curved plate between JV2 setae, apparently a remnant of the ventral shield. Anal shield smooth, 90 89 (85–90) long and 55 58 (55–63) wide. Seta JV5 70 65 (55–70). Opisthogastric integument with two pairs of metapodal plates. Chelicera (Fig. 7): fixed digit 45 44 (42–45), with 19 teeth in addition to apical tooth and pilus dentilis; movable digit 43 43 (42–44) long, with seven teeth in addition to apical tooth. Spermatheca (Fig. 8): cup-shaped calyx 11 10 (9–12) long. Legs (Fig. 9): macrosetal lengths: SgeI 57 56 (53–59), SgeII 49 50 (49–54), SgeIII 50 52 (50–56), StiIII 47 46 (44–50), SgeIV 70 75 (70–81), StiIV 61 64 (60–70), StIV 175 176 (163–188). Male (n= 2). Dorsum: dorsal shield smooth, except for lateral striae anteriad of S4; 325–375 long, 250 wide at level of s4; setae: j1 34–38, j3 15, j4 11, j5 8–9, j6 10, J 2 9–10, J5 7–8, z 2 10–11, z 4 21–25, z5 7–8, Z 1 8–10, Z4 94–95, Z5 75–82, s4 127, S 2 13 –15, S4 11, S 5 9 –10, r3 45–47, R 1 20–23. Venter (Fig. 10): ventrianal shield subtriangular, 152–157 long and 210–225 wide at anterior corners; pair of pre-anal pores mesad of JV2; JV5 34–35. Spermatodactyl (Fig. 11): L-shaped, shaft 20 long; foot 70–73 long. Legs: macrosetal lengths: SgeI 53–54, SgeII 47–49, SgeIII 48, StiIII 48–49, SgeIV 60–63, StiIV 64–65, StIV 165–172. Remarks. Females of the only other species so far known in this genus, H. maxima, differ from the new species here described by having S4 and R1 distinctly shorter in relation to other setae (e.g., ratio between Z4 and each of those setae respectively 15.7 and 9.8 in H. maxima and 8.3 and 5.4 in the new species); setae j1, j3, SgeII, SgeIII, StiIII, SgeIV, StiIV and StIV of H. maxima are distinctly longer (43, 16, 61, 84, 63, 128, 120 and 220, respectively) than in the new species, but that could be related to its larger size; the movable digit of H. maxima has only with three teeth in addition to the apical tooth. Tarsus IV of H. maxima with one elongate seta in addition to macroseta (only macroseta in H. mcmurtryi). Material examined: Holotype female, on Clidemia hirta (L.) D. Don (Melastomataceae), Manaus (02°54’58”S; 59°59’49”W), Amazonas state, Brazil, 9 November 2013, collected by W.P. da Cruz; 3 paratype females, Rio Preto da Eva (02°26’04”S; 59°33’46”W), Amazonas state, Brazil, 18 February 2013, same host and collector as holotype; 1 paratype female on Cocos nucifera L. (Arecaceae), Rio Preto da Eva, 18 February 2013, same collector as holotype; 1 paratype male on C. nucifera, Rio Preto da Eva, 15 August 2012, same collector as holotype. Deposited at Acari Collection of Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia da Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” (ESALQ-USP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil. One paratype female, 18 February 2013, same locality, host and collector as holotype. Deposited at the Invertebrates Collection of Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Two paratype females and 1 paratype male, 18 December 2015, collected by E.S. de Figueiredo, other data same as holotype. Deposited at the mite reference collection of Departamento de Zoologia e Botânica da Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. Etymology: This species is named in honour of the late James A. McMurtry, eminent acarologist, specialist on biological control of pests by phytoseiid mites, and leading phytoseiid taxonomist. Modified characterisation of Honduriella. Taking into account the new species here described and our examination of the holotype of H. maxima, this genus is considered to have the following characteristics. Adult female. Idiosomal setal pattern: 10A:9B/JV-3:ZV. Dorsal shield smooth, except for lateral striae anteriad of S2 –S4, over 400 µm long, with Z4 longer than Z5; s4 also long, seemingly longer than Z4; j1 much shorter, but longer than distance between its base and the base of the same seta on the opposite side; other dorsal shield setae shorter (less than half as long as distance to seta immediately behind); r3 about 3–4 times as long as R1, both on unsclerotised cuticle. Sternal and genital shields lightly reticulate over most of their extent, smooth centrally; sternal shield about as long as wide; st4 on metasternal plate; genital shield rounded behind insertion of st5; anal shield smooth, pyriform, bearing only circumanal setae; with seven pairs of opisthogastric setae (JV1, JV2, JV4, JV5, ZV1–ZV3) on integument surrounding anal shield; pre-anal pores distinct. All idiosomatic setae sharp tipped and smooth, except Z4 and Z5 are lightly serrate. Peritreme extending anteriorly beyond level j1. Fixed cheliceral digit with at least 17 teeth and setiform pilus dentilis; movable digit with 3–7 teeth, in addition to apical tooth. Genu II with nine and genu III with seven setae (respectively 2 2/1 2/1 1 and 1 2/1 2/0 1). Macrosetae smooth and sharp-tipped, present on genua of all legs, tibiae of legs III and IV and tarsus of leg IV. Spermatheca with calyx cup-shaped and atrium discrete. Adult male. Setae r3 and R1 on dorsal shield. Sternogenital and ventrianal shields reticulate. Ventrianal shield with five pairs of pre-anal setae (JV1, JV2, JV4, ZV2 and ZV3) and one pair of pores. Spermatodactyl L-shaped. Other characteristics similar to adult female.

Honduriella mcmurtryi Demite n. sp. Diagnosis. Females with dorsal shield smooth except for lateral striae anteriad of S2; all dorsal setae smooth, except Z4 and Z5, lightly serrate; with s4 longer than Z4 and Z5. Sternal and genital shields lightly reticulate over most of their extent, smooth centrally; with a pair of prominent pores on a lightly sclerotised and curved plate between JV2 setae, apparently a remnant of the ventral shield; anal shield smooth, pyriform. Calyx cup-shaped. Macrosetae smooth and sharp-tipped, present on genua of all legs, tibiae of legs III and IV and tarsus of leg IV. Description. Female (n= 8). Dorsum (Fig. 5): dorsal shield smooth, except for lateral striae anteriad of S2, 415 419 (405���435) long, 262 263 (250���275) wide at level of s4; with 15 pairs of lyrifissures (poroids) and seven pairs of pores (solenostomes). Setal lengths: j1 38 38 (34���41), j 3 14 14 (12���16), j 4 11 11 (10���11), j5 9 9 (8���10), j 6 10 8 (7���10), J 2 11 10 (9���11), J5 9 8 (7���9), z 2 13 13 (12���15), z 4 21 20 (19���21), z5 8 9 (8���9), Z 1 9 10 (8���11), Z4 125 121 (112���128), Z5 93 93 (85���110), s4 150 159 (145���170), S 2 15 15 (13���16), S 4 15 15 (11���18), S 5 10 10 (9���11), r3 58 57 (54���60), R 1 22 23 (21���26). Venter (Fig. 6): sternal shield with three pairs of setae and two pairs of lyrifissures; distances between st1���st3 77 80 (77���82), st2���st2 92 89 (85���94); distance between st5���st5 77 70 (66���77). Genital shield rounded behind st 5. A pair of prominent pores present on a lightly sclerotised and curved plate between JV2 setae, apparently a remnant of the ventral shield. Anal shield smooth, 90 89 (85���90) long and 55 58 (55���63) wide. Seta JV5 70 65 (55���70). Opisthogastric integument with two pairs of metapodal plates. Chelicera (Fig. 7): fixed digit 45 44 (42���45), with 19 teeth in addition to apical tooth and pilus dentilis; movable digit 43 43 (42���44) long, with seven teeth in addition to apical tooth. Spermatheca (Fig. 8): cup-shaped calyx 11 10 (9���12) long. Legs (Fig. 9): macrosetal lengths: SgeI 57 56 (53���59), SgeII 49 50 (49���54), SgeIII 50 52 (50���56), StiIII 47 46 (44���50), SgeIV 70 75 (70���81), StiIV 61 64 (60���70), StIV 175 176 (163���188). Male (n= 2). Dorsum: dorsal shield smooth, except for lateral striae anteriad of S4; 325���375 long, 250 wide at level of s4; setae: j1 34���38, j3 15, j4 11, j5 8���9, j6 10, J 2 9���10, J5 7���8, z 2 10���11, z 4 21���25, z5 7���8, Z 1 8���10, Z4 94���95, Z5 75���82, s4 127, S 2 13 ���15, S4 11, S 5 9 ���10, r3 45���47, R 1 20���23. Venter (Fig. 10): ventrianal shield subtriangular, 152���157 long and 210���225 wide at anterior corners; pair of pre-anal pores mesad of JV2; JV5 34���35. Spermatodactyl (Fig. 11): L-shaped, shaft 20 long; foot 70���73 long. Legs: macrosetal lengths: SgeI 53���54, SgeII 47���49, SgeIII 48, StiIII 48���49, SgeIV 60���63, StiIV 64���65, StIV 165���172. Remarks. Females of the only other species so far known in this genus, H. maxima, differ from the new species here described by having S4 and R1 distinctly shorter in relation to other setae (e.g., ratio between Z4 and each of those setae respectively 15.7 and 9.8 in H. maxima and 8.3 and 5.4 in the new species); setae j1, j3, SgeII, SgeIII, StiIII, SgeIV, StiIV and StIV of H. maxima are distinctly longer (43, 16, 61, 84, 63, 128, 120 and 220, respectively) than in the new species, but that could be related to its larger size; the movable digit of H. maxima has only with three teeth in addition to the apical tooth. Tarsus IV of H. maxima with one elongate seta in addition to macroseta (only macroseta in H. mcmurtryi). Material examined: Holotype female, on Clidemia hirta (L.) D. Don (Melastomataceae), Manaus (02��54���58���S; 59��59���49���W), Amazonas state, Brazil, 9 November 2013, collected by W.P. da Cruz; 3 paratype females, Rio Preto da Eva (02��26���04���S; 59��33���46���W), Amazonas state, Brazil, 18 February 2013, same host and collector as holotype; 1 paratype female on Cocos nucifera L. (Arecaceae), Rio Preto da Eva, 18 February 2013, same collector as holotype; 1 paratype male on C. nucifera, Rio Preto da Eva, 15 August 2012, same collector as holotype. Deposited at Acari Collection of Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia da Escola Superior de Agricultura ���Luiz de Queiroz��� (ESALQ-USP), Piracicaba, S��o Paulo, Brazil. One paratype female, 18 February 2013, same locality, host and collector as holotype. Deposited at the Invertebrates Collection of Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amaz��nia (INPA), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Two paratype females and 1 paratype male, 18 December 2015, collected by E.S. de Figueiredo, other data same as holotype. Deposited at the mite reference collection of Departamento de Zoologia e Bot��nica da Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), S��o Jos�� do Rio Preto, S��o Paulo, Brazil. Etymology: This species is named in honour of the late James A. McMurtry, eminent acarologist, specialist on biological control of pests by phytoseiid mites, and leading phytoseiid taxonomist. Modified characterisation of Honduriella. Taking into account the new species here described and our examination of the holotype of H. maxima, this genus is considered to have the following characteristics. Adult female. Idiosomal setal pattern: 10A:9B/JV-3:ZV. Dorsal shield smooth, except for lateral striae anteriad of S2 ���S4, over 400 ��m long, with Z4 longer than Z5; s4 also long, seemingly longer than Z4; j1 much shorter, but longer than distance between its base and the base of the same seta on the opposite side; other dorsal shield setae shorter (less than half as long as distance to seta immediately behind); r3 about 3���4 times as long as R1, both on unsclerotised cuticle. Sternal and genital shields lightly reticulate over most of their extent, smooth centrally; sternal shield about as long as wide; st4 on metasternal plate; genital shield rounded behind insertion of st5; anal shield smooth, pyriform, bearing only circumanal setae; with seven pairs of opisthogastric setae (JV1, JV2, JV4, JV5, ZV1���ZV3) on integument surrounding anal shield; pre-anal pores distinct. All idiosomatic setae sharp tipped and smooth, except Z4 and Z5 are lightly serrate. Peritreme extending anteriorly beyond level j1. Fixed cheliceral digit with at least 17 teeth and setiform pilus dentilis; movable digit with 3���7 teeth, in addition to apical tooth. Genu II with nine and genu III with seven setae (respectively 2 2/1 2/1 1 and 1 2/1 2/0 1). Macrosetae smooth and sharp-tipped, present on genua of all legs, tibiae of legs III and IV and tarsus of leg IV. Spermatheca with calyx cup-shaped and atrium discrete. Adult male. Setae r3 and R1 on dorsal shield. Sternogenital and ventrianal shields reticulate. Ventrianal shield with five pairs of pre-anal setae (JV1, JV2, JV4, ZV2 and ZV3) and one pair of pores. Spermatodactyl L-shaped. Other characteristics similar to adult female., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Da Cruz, Wilton P., Bolton, Samuel & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2018, Redescription of Honduriella maxima Denmark & Evans (Acari: Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae), description of a new species of Honduriella Denmark & Evans from the Amazonian Forest, and a modified characterisation of the genus, pp. 331-337 in Zootaxa 4442 (2) on pages 332-335, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4442.2.9, http://zenodo.org/record/1303195

Demite, Peterson R., Da Cruz, Wilton P., Bolton, Samuel, De Moraes, Gilberto J. (2018): Redescription of Honduriella maxima Denmark & Evans (Acari: Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae), description of a new species of Honduriella Denmark & Evans from the Amazonian Forest, and a modified characterisation of the genus. Zootaxa 4442 (2): 331-337, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4442.2.9

Honduriella maxima Denmark & Evans Honduriella maxima Denmark & Evans, in Denmark et al., 1999: 21. Honduriella maxima. ��� Chant & McMurtry, 2004: 215; 2007: 83; Moraes et al., 2004: 89. Redescription. Female (n=1). Dorsum (Fig. 1): dorsal shield smooth, except for lateral striae anteriad of S4, 460 long, 304 wide at level of s4; with 13 pairs of lyrifissures (poroids) and seven pairs of pores (solenostomes). Setal lengths: j1 43, j3 16, j4 9, j5 7, j6 7, J2 missing, J5 9, z2 14, z4 19, z5 7, Z1 8, Z4 157, Z5 118, s4 broken, S2 14, S4 10, S5 10, r 3 61, R1 16. Venter (Fig. 2): sternal shield with three pairs of setae and two pairs of lyrifissures (poroids); distances between st1���st3 93, st2���st2 100; distance between st5���st5 86. Genital shield rounded behind st 5. A pair of prominent pores inserted in a platelet posteromesad of JV2, apparently a remnant of the ventral shield. Anal shield smooth, 94 long and 74 wide. Seta JV5 81. Opisthogastric integument with two pairs of metapodal plates. Chelicera: fixed digit 42, with 17/19 teeth in addition to apical tooth; movable digit 48 long, with three teeth in addition to apical tooth. Spermatheca (Fig. 3): cup-shaped calyx, 9 long. Legs (Fig. 4): macrosetal lengths: SgeI 63, SgeII 61, SgeIII 84, StiIII 63, SgeIV 128, StiIV 120, StIV 220. Remarks. The information provided here complements the original description of the species, which did not include measurements of some setae (JV 5, SgeI -III and StiIII), the number of lyrifissures (poroids) on the dorsal shield, and the number of teeth of the movable cheliceral digit. Differences between information provided in the original description and as observed in our examination of the holotype refer mainly to the quadrate shape of the sternal shield (much longer than wide in the original description), and the length of the macrosetae on the genu (128), tibia (120) and tarsus (220) of leg IV (in original description: 112, 102 and 206, respectively). Detailed illustrations of the reticulation of the sternal and genital shields, and of the spermatheca are also provided. Material examined: Holotype female, from an unidentified hairy-leaved plant from Olancho, Nance, Honduras. Deposited at Florida State Collection of Arthropods, Gainesville, Florida, USA., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Da Cruz, Wilton P., Bolton, Samuel & De Moraes, Gilberto J., 2018, Redescription of Honduriella maxima Denmark & Evans (Acari: Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae), description of a new species of Honduriella Denmark & Evans from the Amazonian Forest, and a modified characterisation of the genus, pp. 331-337 in Zootaxa 4442 (2) on page 332, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4442.2.9, http://zenodo.org/record/1303195, {"references":["Denmark, H. A., Evans, G. A., Aguilar, H., Vargas, C. & Ochoa, R. (1999) Phytoseiidae of Central America (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, 125 pp.","Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2004) A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part III. The tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtribe Amblyseiina n. subtribe. International Journal of Acarology, 30, 171 - 228. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 01647950408684388","Moraes, G. J. de, McMurtry, J. A., Denmark, H. A & Campos, C. B. (2004) A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa, 434 (1), 1 - 494. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 434.1.1"]}

Amazoniaseius imparisetosus Demite, Cruz & McMurtry Female (n = 15). Figures 1–5. Dorsum. With 21 pairs of setae (j1, j3–j6, J2, J4, J5, z2–z6, Z4, Z5, s4, s6, S2, S4, r3, R1) and two unpaired setae (x and X); setae r3 and R1 on unsclerotised cuticle. Dorsal shield ornamented with nodular structures, one pair of pores and four pairs of lyrifissures distinguishable, 290 293 (275–310) long and 102 105 (100–112) wide. Setal length: j 1 25 27 (25–28), j3 35 37 (34–40), j4 44 42 (40–45), j5 58 60 (56–63), j6 75 77 (70–81), J2 72 75 (72–77), J4 48 50 (45–57), J5 57 57 (51–69), z 2 31 30 (25–33), z3 40 41 (40–43), z4 66 65 (61–70), z5 36 37 (35–39), z6 57 60 (55–65), Z4 48 50 (46–53), Z5 70 73 (70–80), s4 80 81 (76–89), s6 87 93 (87–100), S2 70 71 (68–77), S4 68 68 (65–74), r3 45 49 (44–54), R1 57 57 (52–60), x 60 62 (55–67), X 50 54 (48–61). Setae barbed and pointed. Venter. Ventral shields distinct. Sternal shield lightly reticulate, with three pairs of setae and two pairs of lyrifissures; distance between st1–st3 60 62 (54–65), st2–st2 61 61 (59–64). Seta st4 on metasternal plate. Genital shield smooth, with posterior margin broadly rounded; distance between st5–st5 67 66 (62–72). Anal shield ovoid, lightly reticulate and with a pair of pores on anterolateral margins; 67 64 (58–67) long, 50 51 (44–55) wide at anus level. With three pairs of opisthogastric setae (JV1, JV2 and JV5; all on unsclerotised cuticle) in addition to circumanal setae; JV5 47 50 (47–53). Ventral setae smooth. Metapodal plates indistinguishable. Peritreme extending to level of j3. Spermatheca. Calyx cup- to bell-shaped, 10 11 (10-13) long; atrium relatively small, but distinct. Chelicera. Fixed cheliceral digit 29 29 (27–30), with 2–3 distal teeth in addition to apical tooth and pilus dentilus; movable digit 25 26 (24–27) long, edentate. Legs. Macrosetae of the following lengths: Sge IV 60 59 (57–62), Sti IV 41 43 (40–46), St IV 110 109 (104– 115), all pointed; other legs without macrosetae. Chaetotatic formulae: genu II – 2 2/1 2/0 1; genu III – 1 2/1 2/0 1. Deutonymph (n = 2). Figures 6–7. Dorsum. Chaetotaxy as in adult female. Dorsal shield lightly reticulate, pores and lyrifissures not distinguishable, 244–247 long and 110–121 wide. Setal length: j1 21, j3 35–38, j4 41–44, j5 63–65, j6 89–91, J2 66–75, J4 38–39, J5 40–52, z2 28, z3 35–38, z4 70–78, z5 34–38, z6 52–57, Z4 37–38, Z5 52–54, s4 84 –88, s6 86 – 90, S2 70 – 79, S4 50 –53, r3 39–40, R1 41–42, x 58 –63, X 35 –40. Setae slightly barbed and pointed. Venter. Shields weakly sclerotised. Sternogenital shield with five pairs of setae (st1–st5) and only a pair of distinguishable lyrifissures. Anal shield indistinguishable. Opisthogastric region with two pairs of setae (JV1 and JV2), in addition to circumanal setae; JV5 35-36, visible dorsally in mounted specimen. Peritreme extending to level between z2 and z3. Chelicera. Not clearly visible. Legs. Macrosetae of the following length: Sge IV 50, Sti IV 58 –60, St IV 114–115, all pointed; other legs without macrosetae. Protonymph (n= 2). Figures 8–9. Dorsum. Dorsal shield barely distinguishable; pores and lyrifissures not distinguishable; 190–200 long and 100–108 wide. Setal length: j 1 19–22, j 3 30–31, j4 38–40, j5 69–70, j6 90–94, J2 52–54, J 5 21–25, z 2 28–32, z4 70–74, z 5 28–32, Z 4 26–28, Z5 36–38, s4 79–86, s6 44–45, S4 52, r 3 23–24, R 1 13–15. Setae slightly barbed and pointed, except R1 apparently smooth and pointed. Venter. Ventral shields indistinguishable. Venter with st1–st3, JV1, JV2, JV5 and circumanal setae. Peritreme short, extending to level of s6. Chelicera. Not clearly visible. Leg. Macrosetae of the following length: Sge IV 62 –67, Sti IV 65 –70, St IV 105–108, all pointed; other legs without macrosetae. Type material (15 females, 2 deutonymphs and 2 protonymphs) Holotype female, 8 paratype females, 2 paratype deutonymphs and 2 paratype protonymphs: Rio Preto da Eva (02°26’04” S; 59°33’46” W), Amazonas state, Brazil, collected by W.P. Cruz from Elaeis oleifera (Kunth) Cortés (Arecaceae) on January 22, 2013; deposited at Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura ‘ Luiz de Queiroz ” (ESALQ / USP), Piracicaba, São Paulo state, Brazil. One paratype female collected on May 14, 2013 and one paratype female collected on October 30, 2012; other collection data and depository as for holotype; one paratype female, collected from Astrocaryum aculeatum G.F.W Meyer (Arecaceae) on March 26, 2013; other collection data and depository as for holotype; three paratype females, same collection data as holotype; all deposited at Departamento de Zoologia e Botânica, UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil. Etymology. The name imparisetosus refers to the presence of unpaired setae in the dorsal shield. Remarks. The identification of some dorsal shield setae in this study is provisional, because of their unique position within the phytoseiids. One of the uncertainties refers to the identity of the seta called x in this paper. Is that a podonotal or opisthonotal seta? That seta, observed in the examined deutonymphs and adult females, could actually correspond to J1. Supportive of this interpretation is the absence of this seta in some specimens and the occurrence of two x setae in one of the specimens collected. The very anteriad position of x in relation to what would be expected for the normal position of J1 argues against that interpretation. Also against this interpretation is the fact that in Ascidae sensu Lindquist & Evans (1963), a group taxonomically close to the phytoseiids (see Lindquist et al., 2009 and Famah-Sourassou et al., 2015), J1 normally first appears in the protonymphal stage, whereas in the taxon here described it appeared only in the deutonymphal stage. Thus, we could conclude that the most anterior unpaired seta is podonotal, occupying the same location as the unpaired podonotal setae found in Spadiseius calyptrogynae Lindquist & Moraza (Melicharidae) (Lindquist & Moraza, 2008). The fact that this seta is not found in Spadiseius spathiphyllae Lindquist & Moraza suggests its instability in different species of that genus (and perhaps in the genus here described). Alternatively, if that seta is really J1, it would be necessary to argue that the strong lateral compression of the dorsal shield caused disturbance to the normal chaetotactic pattern, leading to the appearance of J 1 in the deutonymphal rather than in the protonymphal stage. The tendency towards evolutionary loss of J1 could also explain its instability in the deutonymph and adult. It could be argued that the seta interpreted as S 2 in this work is actually S3, because of the position. A point against that interpretation is that S3 has never been reported for phytoseiids. Its first appearance in the deutonymphal stage makes its identification more difficult because in Ascidae sensu Lindquist & Evans (1965) S2 first appear in the protonymphal stage, whereas S3 first appear in the larval stage. The actual absence of S5 is supported by the fact that the usual position of this seta is posterolaterad of the pore located anterolaterally of Z5 (idm5 of Athias-Henriot, 1969). Wide variation is observed among Amazoniaseius imparisetosus n. sp. specimens in relation to the absence of some opisthonotal setae (all of which inserted behind J2): X in five specimens, one J 5 in two specimens, X and one J 5 in one specimen, one S 4 in two specimens, one Z 4 in three specimens, and one Z4 and one S 4 in one specimen. Intra-specific variations as presence or absence of setae, place of insertion of setae, lengths of setae etc., have been reported for other species (e.g. Kolodochka, 1995; Demite et al., 2008; Toyoshima & Amano, 2013; Tixier et al., 2016). The idiosomal setal pattern of the new taxon here described has never been reported in Phytoseiidae. On the ventral surface of the idiosoma, the absence of all ZV setae has not been previously reported. Thus, our interpretation of the dorsal idiosomal setae in the new taxa here described leads us to propose a new setal pattern for the phytoseiids: 13A+x:8F+X/JV-3,4:ZV-1–3.

Amazoniaseius new genus Demite, Cruz & McMurtry Diagnosis. Protonymphs, deutonymphs and adult females with dorsal idiosomal setae long, distinctly barbed in adults (but slightly barbed in nymphal stages), dorsal shield narrowed, J5 relatively long (over twice as long as distance J5���J5); fixed cheliceral digit with few teeth. Deutonymphs and adult females with an unpaired seta immediately behind j6 (x) and another immediately behind J2 (X); z3, z6, s6, J4 present; macrosetae present only on genu, tibia and tarsus of leg IV; Z1, S5, JV3, JV4, ZV1���ZV3 absent; anal shield with a pair of small pores on anterolateral margins. Adult female. Dorsum of idiosoma with 21 pairs of setae (j1, j3���j6, J2, J4, J5, z2���z6, Z4, Z5, s4, s6, S2, S4, r3, R1) and two unpaired setae (x and X). Setae J5 and S2 displaced respectively anteriad and posteriad of their usual position. Dorsal shield strongly narrowed. Ventral shields distinct. Sternal shield with three pairs of setae and two pairs of lyrifissures. Seta st 4 set on metasternal plate. Posterior margin of genital shield broadly rounded. Anal shield ovoid, with a pair of pores on anterolateral margins. With three pairs of opisthogastric setae (JV1, JV2 and JV5; all on unsclerotised cuticle) in addition to circumanal setae. Peritreme extending to level of j3. Fixed cheliceral digit with 2���3 teeth in addition to apical tooth; movable digit edentate. Macrosetae present only on genu, tibia and tarsus IV. Adult male. Unknown. Deutonymph. Dorsal idiosomal setae as in adult female. Sternogenital shield with five pairs of setae (st1���st5). Opisthogastric region with two pairs of setae (JV1 and JV2) in addition to circumanals. Peritreme extending to level between z2 and z3. Leg macrosetae as in adult female. Protonymph. Dorsum of idiosoma with 17 pairs of setae, distinguished from adult female and deutonymph by the absence of j4, z3 and z6; seta J5 also displaced anteriad of usual position. Ventral shields indistinguishable; with st1���st3, JV1, JV2, JV5 and circumanal setae. Peritreme extending to the level of s6. Leg macrosetae as in deutonymph and adult female. Etymology. The name of this genus is a combination of Amazonia referring to Amazonia rainforest, plus seius (a Roman surname commonly used to compose names of mesostigmatic mites). Remarks. This taxon is placed in Typhlodrominae by having setae z3, s6, S2 and S4. The presence of J4 is reported for the first time in Typhlodrominae, whereas the absence of all ZV setae is reported for the first time in Phytoseiidae. Within this subfamily, this genus is placed in Paraseiulini (Wainstein, 1976) by the presence of z6 and S4, but it differs from the other genera in this tribe by the presence of the unpaired setae and J4, by the absence of S5, JV4 and ZV, by the narrow dorsal shield and the presence of anal shield. A long seta J5 is not a common characteristic in this family; J5 as long as Z5 has been reported for Macrocaudus Moraes, McMurtry & Mineiro (Amblyseiinae), but even in that case, those setae are shorter than the distance between their bases (Moraes et al., 2003). A broadly rounded posterior margin of the genital shield has been reported for Amblyseiella Muma and Phytoseiulus Evans (Amblyseiinae), but apparently for none of the Typhlodrominae genera. Among the phytoseiids, the presence of extra unpaired dorsal setae of the idiosoma has not been reported. However, a single seta anteriad of J2 has been reported in some specimens of Australiseiulus angophorae (Schicha) (Typhlodrominae), whereas in other specimens two setae or none have been found (Schicha, 1981); other species of the same genus do not have that seta, interpreted by Beard (1999) as J1. Other phytoseiids reported to have seta J1 belong to the Amblyseiinae, namely Chileseius Gonzalez & Schuster, Diaphoroseius Chant & McMurtry, Evansoseius Sheals and Rubuseius Ragusa, as well as a few species of Typhodromalus Muma and Typhlodromips De Leon (Chant & McMurtry, 2007). Australiseiulus poplar Beard has a J seta interpreted by Beard (1999) as J4. In comparison with some specimens of Arrenoseius palustris (Chant) and with Macrocaudus multisetatus Moraes, McMurtry & Mineiro, the only phytoseiid species (Amblyseiinae) reported to have J3 (Moraes et al., 2003; Chant & McMurtry, 2007), and with species of the closely related family Blattisociidae (Lindquist & Evans, 1965), it seems that this seta could instead be J3. Seta J4 has been reported in several phytoseiid genera (all Amblyseiinae), namely Evansoseius, Pararrenoseius Chant & McMurtry, Rubuseius, as well as in Chileseius camposi Gonzalez & Schuster, M. multisetatus, Typhloseiella perforata (Wainstein) and some specimens of A. palustris (Chant & McMurtry, 2007). Extra setae are quite commonly found in other mesostigmatid mites, including species of Ascidae, Blattisociidae and Melicharidae (Moraes et al., 2016) and Laelapidae (Evans & Till, 1966). Most often, extra setae are found in only some of the species of each genus. Thus, other species of this new genus may lack the setae here referred to as x and X., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cruz, Wilton P. & Moraes, Gilberto J., 2017, Amazoniaseius imparisetosus n. sp., n. g.: an unusual new phytoseiid mite (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from the Amazon forest, pp. 302-310 in Zootaxa 4236 (2) on pages 303-304, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4236.2.5, http://zenodo.org/record/321772, {"references":["Wainstein, B. A. (1976) A new tribe of the family Phytoseiidae (Parasitiformes) Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 55, 696 - 700. [in Russian]","Moraes, G. J. de, McMurtry, J. A. & Mineiro, J. L. de C. (2003) A new genus and species of Phytoseiid mite (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Brazil. International Journal of Acarology, 29, 47 - 54.","Schicha, E. (1981) Five known and five new species of phytoseiid mites from Australia and the South Pacific. General and Applied Entomology, 13, 29 - 46.","Beard, J. J. (1999) A revision of the Australian mite genus Australiseiulus Muma (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Invertebrate Taxonomy, 13, 351 - 368.","Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2007) Illustrated Keys and Diagnoses for the Genera and Subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the World (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, 219 pp.","Lindquist, E. E. & Evans, G. O. (1965) Taxonomic concepts in the Ascidae, with a modified setal nomenclature for the idiosoma of the Gamasina (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 47, 1 - 65. https: // doi. org / 10.4039 / entm 9747 fv","Evans, G. O. & Till, W. M. (1966) Studies on the British Dermanyssidae (Acari: Mesostigmata). Part II. Classification. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology, 14, 107 - 370."]}

Amazoniaseius imparisetosus Demite, Cruz & McMurtry Female (n = 15). Figures 1���5. Dorsum. With 21 pairs of setae (j1, j3���j6, J2, J4, J5, z2���z6, Z4, Z5, s4, s6, S2, S4, r3, R1) and two unpaired setae (x and X); setae r3 and R1 on unsclerotised cuticle. Dorsal shield ornamented with nodular structures, one pair of pores and four pairs of lyrifissures distinguishable, 290 293 (275���310) long and 102 105 (100���112) wide. Setal length: j 1 25 27 (25���28), j3 35 37 (34���40), j4 44 42 (40���45), j5 58 60 (56���63), j6 75 77 (70���81), J2 72 75 (72���77), J4 48 50 (45���57), J5 57 57 (51���69), z 2 31 30 (25���33), z3 40 41 (40���43), z4 66 65 (61���70), z5 36 37 (35���39), z6 57 60 (55���65), Z4 48 50 (46���53), Z5 70 73 (70���80), s4 80 81 (76���89), s6 87 93 (87���100), S2 70 71 (68���77), S4 68 68 (65���74), r3 45 49 (44���54), R1 57 57 (52���60), x 60 62 (55���67), X 50 54 (48���61). Setae barbed and pointed. Venter. Ventral shields distinct. Sternal shield lightly reticulate, with three pairs of setae and two pairs of lyrifissures; distance between st1���st3 60 62 (54���65), st2���st2 61 61 (59���64). Seta st4 on metasternal plate. Genital shield smooth, with posterior margin broadly rounded; distance between st5���st5 67 66 (62���72). Anal shield ovoid, lightly reticulate and with a pair of pores on anterolateral margins; 67 64 (58���67) long, 50 51 (44���55) wide at anus level. With three pairs of opisthogastric setae (JV1, JV2 and JV5; all on unsclerotised cuticle) in addition to circumanal setae; JV5 47 50 (47���53). Ventral setae smooth. Metapodal plates indistinguishable. Peritreme extending to level of j3. Spermatheca. Calyx cup- to bell-shaped, 10 11 (10-13) long; atrium relatively small, but distinct. Chelicera. Fixed cheliceral digit 29 29 (27���30), with 2���3 distal teeth in addition to apical tooth and pilus dentilus; movable digit 25 26 (24���27) long, edentate. Legs. Macrosetae of the following lengths: Sge IV 60 59 (57���62), Sti IV 41 43 (40���46), St IV 110 109 (104��� 115), all pointed; other legs without macrosetae. Chaetotatic formulae: genu II ��� 2 2/1 2/0 1; genu III ��� 1 2/1 2/0 1. Deutonymph (n = 2). Figures 6���7. Dorsum. Chaetotaxy as in adult female. Dorsal shield lightly reticulate, pores and lyrifissures not distinguishable, 244���247 long and 110���121 wide. Setal length: j1 21, j3 35���38, j4 41���44, j5 63���65, j6 89���91, J2 66���75, J4 38���39, J5 40���52, z2 28, z3 35���38, z4 70���78, z5 34���38, z6 52���57, Z4 37���38, Z5 52���54, s4 84 ���88, s6 86 ��� 90, S2 70 ��� 79, S4 50 ���53, r3 39���40, R1 41���42, x 58 ���63, X 35 ���40. Setae slightly barbed and pointed. Venter. Shields weakly sclerotised. Sternogenital shield with five pairs of setae (st1���st5) and only a pair of distinguishable lyrifissures. Anal shield indistinguishable. Opisthogastric region with two pairs of setae (JV1 and JV2), in addition to circumanal setae; JV5 35-36, visible dorsally in mounted specimen. Peritreme extending to level between z2 and z3. Chelicera. Not clearly visible. Legs. Macrosetae of the following length: Sge IV 50, Sti IV 58 ���60, St IV 114���115, all pointed; other legs without macrosetae. Protonymph (n= 2). Figures 8���9. Dorsum. Dorsal shield barely distinguishable; pores and lyrifissures not distinguishable; 190���200 long and 100���108 wide. Setal length: j 1 19���22, j 3 30���31, j4 38���40, j5 69���70, j6 90���94, J2 52���54, J 5 21���25, z 2 28���32, z4 70���74, z 5 28���32, Z 4 26���28, Z5 36���38, s4 79���86, s6 44���45, S4 52, r 3 23���24, R 1 13���15. Setae slightly barbed and pointed, except R1 apparently smooth and pointed. Venter. Ventral shields indistinguishable. Venter with st1���st3, JV1, JV2, JV5 and circumanal setae. Peritreme short, extending to level of s6. Chelicera. Not clearly visible. Leg. Macrosetae of the following length: Sge IV 62 ���67, Sti IV 65 ���70, St IV 105���108, all pointed; other legs without macrosetae. Type material (15 females, 2 deutonymphs and 2 protonymphs) Holotype female, 8 paratype females, 2 paratype deutonymphs and 2 paratype protonymphs: Rio Preto da Eva (02��26���04��� S; 59��33���46��� W), Amazonas state, Brazil, collected by W.P. Cruz from Elaeis oleifera (Kunth) Cort��s (Arecaceae) on January 22, 2013; deposited at Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Universidade de S��o Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura ��� Luiz de Queiroz ��� (ESALQ / USP), Piracicaba, S��o Paulo state, Brazil. One paratype female collected on May 14, 2013 and one paratype female collected on October 30, 2012; other collection data and depository as for holotype; one paratype female, collected from Astrocaryum aculeatum G.F.W Meyer (Arecaceae) on March 26, 2013; other collection data and depository as for holotype; three paratype females, same collection data as holotype; all deposited at Departamento de Zoologia e Bot��nica, UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista, S��o Jos�� do Rio Preto, S��o Paulo state, Brazil. Etymology. The name imparisetosus refers to the presence of unpaired setae in the dorsal shield. Remarks. The identification of some dorsal shield setae in this study is provisional, because of their unique position within the phytoseiids. One of the uncertainties refers to the identity of the seta called x in this paper. Is that a podonotal or opisthonotal seta? That seta, observed in the examined deutonymphs and adult females, could actually correspond to J1. Supportive of this interpretation is the absence of this seta in some specimens and the occurrence of two x setae in one of the specimens collected. The very anteriad position of x in relation to what would be expected for the normal position of J1 argues against that interpretation. Also against this interpretation is the fact that in Ascidae sensu Lindquist & Evans (1963), a group taxonomically close to the phytoseiids (see Lindquist et al., 2009 and Famah-Sourassou et al., 2015), J1 normally first appears in the protonymphal stage, whereas in the taxon here described it appeared only in the deutonymphal stage. Thus, we could conclude that the most anterior unpaired seta is podonotal, occupying the same location as the unpaired podonotal setae found in Spadiseius calyptrogynae Lindquist & Moraza (Melicharidae) (Lindquist & Moraza, 2008). The fact that this seta is not found in Spadiseius spathiphyllae Lindquist & Moraza suggests its instability in different species of that genus (and perhaps in the genus here described). Alternatively, if that seta is really J1, it would be necessary to argue that the strong lateral compression of the dorsal shield caused disturbance to the normal chaetotactic pattern, leading to the appearance of J 1 in the deutonymphal rather than in the protonymphal stage. The tendency towards evolutionary loss of J1 could also explain its instability in the deutonymph and adult. It could be argued that the seta interpreted as S 2 in this work is actually S3, because of the position. A point against that interpretation is that S3 has never been reported for phytoseiids. Its first appearance in the deutonymphal stage makes its identification more difficult because in Ascidae sensu Lindquist & Evans (1965) S2 first appear in the protonymphal stage, whereas S3 first appear in the larval stage. The actual absence of S5 is supported by the fact that the usual position of this seta is posterolaterad of the pore located anterolaterally of Z5 (idm5 of Athias-Henriot, 1969). Wide variation is observed among Amazoniaseius imparisetosus n. sp. specimens in relation to the absence of some opisthonotal setae (all of which inserted behind J2): X in five specimens, one J 5 in two specimens, X and one J 5 in one specimen, one S 4 in two specimens, one Z 4 in three specimens, and one Z4 and one S 4 in one specimen. Intra-specific variations as presence or absence of setae, place of insertion of setae, lengths of setae etc., have been reported for other species (e.g. Kolodochka, 1995; Demite et al., 2008; Toyoshima & Amano, 2013; Tixier et al., 2016). The idiosomal setal pattern of the new taxon here described has never been reported in Phytoseiidae. On the ventral surface of the idiosoma, the absence of all ZV setae has not been previously reported. Thus, our interpretation of the dorsal idiosomal setae in the new taxa here described leads us to propose a new setal pattern for the phytoseiids: 13A+x:8F+X/JV-3,4:ZV-1���3., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Cruz, Wilton P. & Moraes, Gilberto J., 2017, Amazoniaseius imparisetosus n. sp., n. g.: an unusual new phytoseiid mite (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from the Amazon forest, pp. 302-310 in Zootaxa 4236 (2) on pages 304-305, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4236.2.5, http://zenodo.org/record/321772, {"references":["Lindquist, E. E., Krantz, G. W. & Walter, D. E. (2009) Order Mesostigmata. In: Krantz, G. W. & Walter, D. E. (Eds.), Manual of Acarology. 3 rd Edition. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, pp. 124 - 232.","Famah-Sourassou, N., Moraes, G. J. de, Delalibera Junior, I. & Correa, A. S. (2015) Phylogenetic analysis of Ascidae sensu lato and related groups (Acari: Mesostigmata: Gamasina) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Systematic & Applied Acarology, 20, 225 - 240.","Lindquist, E. E. & Moraza, M. L. (2008) A new genus of flower-dwelling melicharid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata: Ascoidea) phoretic on bats and insects in Costa Rica and Brazil. Zootaxa, 1685, 1 - 37.","Lindquist, E. E. & Evans, G. O. (1965) Taxonomic concepts in the Ascidae, with a modified setal nomenclature for the idiosoma of the Gamasina (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 47, 1 - 65. https: // doi. org / 10.4039 / entm 9747 fv","Athias-Henriot, C. (1969) Les organes cuticulaires sensoriels et glandulaires des gamasides. Poroidotaxie et adenotaxie. Bulletin de la Societe Zoologique de France, 94, 485 - 492.","Kolodochka, L. A. (1995) A revision of the genus Eharius (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Zhurnal Ukrainsikogo Entomologichnogo Tovaristva, 1, 79 - 96.","Demite, P. R., Lofego, A. C. & Feres, R. J. F. (2008) A new species of Galendromus (Acari: Phytoseiidae): a case of intraspecific variation and redefinition of carinulatus species group. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101, 804 - 807. https: // doi. org / 10.1093 / aesa / 101.5.804","Toyoshima, S. & Amano, H. (2013) Intraspecific variations of idiosomal setal patterns of phytoseiid mites. Journal of the Acarological Society of Japan, 22, 25 - 36.","Tixier, M. - S., Allam, L., Douin, M. & Kreiter, S. (2016) Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) of Morocco: new records, descritpions of five new species, re-descriptions of two species, and key for identification. Zootaxa, 4067 (5), 501 - 551. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4067.5.1"]}

Demite, Peterson R., Cruz, Wilton P., Moraes, Gilberto J. (2017): Amazoniaseius imparisetosus n. sp., n. g.: an unusual new phytoseiid mite (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from the Amazon forest. Zootaxa 4236 (2): 302-310, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4236.2.5

Kaliszewskia ochoai sp. nov. (Figs. 1���6) Diagnosis. Adult females of this species can be distinguished from those of other tarsonemid species by the combination of characters given in the diagnosis of the genus. Female (three specimens measured). Gnathosoma: (Fig. 1 a and 2) sub-triangular, length 30 (29���31), maximum width 38 (36���40); dorsal apodeme indistinguishable. Setae dgs 11 (10���12) and vgs 9, smooth; seta pp absent or indistinguishable. Palpi short and robust, each with one subterminal seta and a small cone-shaped structure. Cheliceral stylets 10 (9���10). Pharynx fusiform 16 (15���18) long and 7 (6���7) wide at widest region, with discrete muscular layer and thinly sclerotized walls. Idiosoma (Figs. 1 and 2): Tergites and ventral plates punctated; length 208 (193���230), width at level of c 1 133 (130���138); prodorsal shield covering gnathosoma entirely. Stigma on discrete marginal projection of prodorsal shield, laterad of base of tubercle (40 long) bearing v 1. Seta sc 2 inserted anterolaterad of sc 1. Lengths of setae: v 1 40 (39���42), sc 1 17 (16���17), sc 2 35 (33���36), c 1 48 (46���50), c 2 22 (19���24), d 36 (33���39), e 6 (5���6), f 21 (20���22), h 8 (7���8). Distances between dorsal setae: v 1 ���v 1 17 (16���18), sc 2 ���sc 2 62 (61���62), v 1 ���sc 2 34 (33���35), c 1 ���c 1 81 (77��� 83) c 2 ���c 2 115 (110���118), c 1 ���c 2 40 (38���41), d���d 45 (44���46), f���f 29 (27���30), e���f 5 (4���5), h���h 19 (18���19). Seta v 1 stout and strongly serrate; seta sc 1 knobbed and with tiny spines; setae sc 2, c 1, c 2 and d stout but flexible (tip bent to different directions in mounted specimens), barbed and knobbed; setae e, f and h barbed and sharp-tipped. Coxisternal seta 1a 7 (6���7), inserted near junction of apodeme 1 with prosternal apodeme; coxal pits 1 b hardly distinguishable, located anterolaterad seta 1 a; seta 2a 7 (6���7) inserted on distal end of apodeme 2; coxal pits 2 b posterolaterad 2 a; seta 3a 7 (7���8), inserted midway between sejugal apodeme and apodeme 3; seta 3 b 5, inserted on distal end of apodeme IV. Prosternal apodeme fused with apodemes 1, but not with apodeme 2, conspicuous from apodeme 1 to level of posterior ends of apodemes 2, widening and fading posteriorly to reach sejugal apodeme, which is continuous, but faded medially. Apodeme 3 slightly arched, transverse, extending from anterior end of trochanter III to level posterolaterad insertion of 3 a. Poststernal apodeme distinct, not bifurcate anteriorly, extending from level of apodeme 3 to level of posterior end of trochanter III. Tegula rounded, 11 (10���11) long and 12 (11���12) wide at base. Anterior edge of metapodosomal plate nearly straight. Posterolateral extensions of coxisternal plates IV approaching but not overlapping each other medially beneath tegula. Setae ps minute (2). Legs (Figs. 3���6): lengths (proximal end of trochanter to distal end of tarsus): leg I 52 (51���52), leg II 53 (52��� 53), leg III 54 (51���57), leg IV 36 (36���37). Number of setae (solenidia in parentheses) on femur, genu, tibia and tarsus, respectively: leg I: 4 ��� 4���6 + 8 (+ 1 ��), leg II: 3 ��� 3���4 ��� 5 (+ 1 ��), leg III: 1 + 3���4 ��� 4. Tarsal solenidion �� of tibiotarsus I 7 (6���7), stout and slightly elongate. Sensory cluster of tibia I incomplete (�� 1 and �� 2 missing); eupathidion k (5) proximal to d 34 (32���35), serrate. Solenidion �� of tarsus II proximal, 7, stout and slightly elongate; seta pl'' absent. Seta d of tibia II 38 (36���40), serrate. Femurogenu IV 25; tibiotarsus IV 15. Lengths of leg IV setae: v��F 7, v��G 8, v'Ti 16 (16���17) and tc'' 22 (21���23); setae v'G and v'F slender and smooth, v'Ti lanceolate and smooth; tc"Ta slender and serrate. Larva and male: Unknown. Type material. Holotype ♀ (specimen number 9515): Serra do Conduru, Uru��uca, Bahia State, Brazil, on Plinia sp. (Myrtaceae), 16 March 2013, deposited at Departamento de Zoologia e Bot��nica, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), S��o Jos�� do Rio Preto, S��o Paulo State, Brazil. Paratypes: 2 ♀ (specimen numbers T-MZLQ 3013, T-MZLQ 3014): Ilha do Cardoso, Canan��ia (25 ��04S; 47 �� 55 W), S��o Paulo State, Brazil, on Blepharocalix salicifolius (Kunt) O. Berg (Myrtaceae), 16 July 2012, deposited at Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Escola Superior de Agricultura ���Luiz de Queiroz���(ESALQ), Universidade de S��o Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, S��o Paulo State, Brazil. All specimens collected by P. R. Demite. Etymology. This species is named after the eminent acarologist Ronald Ochoa, USDA, USA. Remarks. Nothing is known about the feeding behavior of this species. Tarsonemini species are known as egg parasitoids, algivores, fungivores or phytophages (Lindquist 1969, 1986; Lofego et al. 2005). The feeding habits of species of the genera morphologically most similar to Kaliszewskia are also inadequately known. Fungitarsonemus species have been speculated to feed on fungi, which could also be the case of the species here described, given that the habitats where the types were found are humid, allowing easy development of fungi on leaves. Species of Ceratotarsonemus, Daidalotarsonemus and Rynchotarsonemus are also thought to feed on algae, lichens or on plant leaves., Published as part of Lofego, Antonio C., Demite, Peterson R. & Moraes, Gilberto J., 2015, A new genus and species of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata) from the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, pp. 561-568 in Zootaxa 3986 (5) on pages 563-567, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3986.5.3, http://zenodo.org/record/242963, {"references":["Lindquist, E. E. (1969) Review of holarctic tarsonemid mites (Acarina: Prostigmata) parasitizing eggs of ipine bark beetles. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 60, 1 - 111.","Lindquist, E. E. (1986) The world genera of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata): a morphological, phylogenetic, and systematic revision, with reclassification of family-group taxa in the Heterostigmata. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 136, 1 - 517."]}

Kaliszewskia gen. nov. Diagnosis. This new genus fits the characterization of Tarsonemini, Tarsoneminae, as described by Lindquist (1986). However, it can be distinguished from all genera of this tribe by a combination of the following female characteristics: a) setae sc 2, c 1, c 2 and d thickened but flexible (tip bent to different directions in mounted specimens), barbed and distally knobbed; b) seta v 1 stout, strongly serrated and inserted at the tip of a long flat tubercle; c) seta ps minute; d) femur I with a postero-ventral cone-shaped projection that bears v''; e) anterior ambulacral claw of legs II and III distinctly shorter than posterior claw; f) seta 3 a inserted distinctly medial end of apodeme 3. The first three characteristics are autapomorphies for the one known species of this new genus (Cetaratotarsonemus De Leon species have c 1, c 2 and d similar to those of the new genus here described, but without distal knobs). The other characteristics are shared with three other genera: a projection on femur I bearing seta v'' is also found in Rhyncotarsonemus Beer; some Fungitarsonemus Cromroy species have asymmetrical ambulacral claws; and Ceratotarsonemus and Fungitarsonemus have seta 3 a inserted anteriad of the medial end of apodeme 3. Description. Adult female. Gnathosoma. Capsule slightly wider than long, sub-triangular, not beaklike anteriorly; palpcoxal setae not observed. Dorsal gnathosomal setae smooth, sharp-tipped. Palpi directed anteriorly, slightly convergent distally, short and robust, each with short seta and short cone-shaped structure. Cheliceral stylets of moderate length, with basal levers hardly distinguishable. Largest diameter of pharynx about one sixth width of gnathosomal capsule, with discrete muscular layer and thinly sclerotized walls; without conspicuous paired gland-like structures posteriorly. Idiosoma. Most setae barbed; setae v 1 inserted on tubercles. Some setae (sc 2, c 1, c 2 and d) moderately elongate, stout, and knobbed. Prodorsal shield extending over base of gnathosoma. Stigmata laterad of base of tubercle bearing v 1, on discrete marginal projection of prodorsal shield; main tracheal trunks with unsclerotized atria, and without sclerotized or divided postatrial structures. Vestigial v 2 mediad insertion of sc 2, latter setae more widely spaced from each other than v 1, and inserted near mid-length of prodorsal shield; seta sc 2 inserted anterolaterad of sc 1. Posterior margins of tergites not conspicuously concave or emarginate. Setae c 1 and c 2 obliquely aligned; setae e and f nearly transversely aligned and each pair closer together than setae d. Venter with apodemes 1 fused to each other and to prosternal apodeme to form Y-shaped structure. Apodeme 2 not fused with prosternal apodeme. Prosternal apodeme well sclerotized up to level slightly posterior to medial ends of apodeme 2, then widening and fading to reach sejugal apodeme, which is continuous, but weakened medially. Apodeme 3 slightly arched and transverse, extending from anterior end of trochanters III to level mediad insertion of 3 a. Apodeme 4 extending convergently from insertion of 3 b to central region of poststernal apodeme. Poststernal apodeme distinct, not bifurcate anteriorly. Anterior margin of coxisternal plates III straight. Setae 3 c and 4 a absent. Bases of legs IV moderately spaced, separated by interval about 1.5 times width of trochanter IV; tegula moderately long, about as long as basal width, rounded apically. Aggenital plate without setae. Pseudanal setae vestigial. Legs: Ambulacrum of leg I with a single, uncinate claw. Ambulacra of legs II and III with empodia and asymmetrically paired claws, anterior claw much smaller than posterior. Femora I and II without flanges or ridges, but femora I with postero-ventral cone-shaped projection bearing v''. Legs I and II of moderate length, no segment distinctly elongate; combined length of genu and tibia of leg II subequal with length of tarsus, and femorogenu about 1.5 longer than tibiotarsus. Trochanter III elongate, subelliptical, plate-like, longer than femorogenu III. Leg IV elongate, cylindrical, with femorogenu about 1.5 longer than tibiotarsus. Number of tactile setae (solenidia in parentheses): femur, genu and tibia+tarsus of leg I, 4 - 4-6 + 8 (1); femur, genu, tibia and tarsus of leg II, 3 - 3-4 - 5 (1); femorogenu, tibia and tarsus of leg III, 1 + 3-4 - 4; femorogenu and tibiotarsus of leg IV, 1 + 1 - 1 + 1. Legs I-III with femoral and genual setation complete, with conspicuously barbed and thickened setae on femur I (d, l' and l''). Tibial sensory cluster of leg I incomplete, without solenidion �� 1 and �� 2. Tarsus I with seta pl' present and pl'' absent. Tarsus II without spine-like pl''. Subunguinal seta (s) of tibiotarsus I and unguinal seta u' of tarsi II and III thorn-like. Remarks. In addition to the features mentioned in the diagnosis, the new genus shares the following features with Fungitarsonemus: palpi short and robust, almost totally fused to gnathosomal capsule; seta sc 2 inserted anteriad of sc 1; seta d of femur I stoutened; solenidia of tibia I and pl'' of tarsus II absent (present in some Fungitarsonemus). The new genus also shares the following features with Ceratotarsonemus, Daidalotarsonemus and Excelsotarsonemus: modified dorsal idiosomal setae and seta l' of femur I stoutened and barbed. An examination of the male and immature will be required to determine the phylogenetic positioning of this new genus in relation to these and other genera. Etymology. This genus is named in memoriam of Marek Kaliszewski, eminent Polish acarologist. Type species. Kaliszewskia ochoai sp. nov., Published as part of Lofego, Antonio C., Demite, Peterson R. & Moraes, Gilberto J., 2015, A new genus and species of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata) from the Atlantic Forest, Brazil, pp. 561-568 in Zootaxa 3986 (5) on pages 562-563, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3986.5.3, http://zenodo.org/record/242963, {"references":["Lindquist, E. E. (1986) The world genera of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata): a morphological, phylogenetic, and systematic revision, with reclassification of family-group taxa in the Heterostigmata. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 136, 1 - 517."]}

Lofego, Antonio C., Demite, Peterson R., Moraes, Gilberto J. (2015): A new genus and species of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata) from the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Zootaxa 3986 (5): 561-568, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3986.5.3

Kaliszewskia ochoai sp. nov. (Figs. 1–6) Diagnosis. Adult females of this species can be distinguished from those of other tarsonemid species by the combination of characters given in the diagnosis of the genus. Female (three specimens measured). Gnathosoma: (Fig. 1 a and 2) sub-triangular, length 30 (29–31), maximum width 38 (36–40); dorsal apodeme indistinguishable. Setae dgs 11 (10–12) and vgs 9, smooth; seta pp absent or indistinguishable. Palpi short and robust, each with one subterminal seta and a small cone-shaped structure. Cheliceral stylets 10 (9–10). Pharynx fusiform 16 (15–18) long and 7 (6–7) wide at widest region, with discrete muscular layer and thinly sclerotized walls. Idiosoma (Figs. 1 and 2): Tergites and ventral plates punctated; length 208 (193–230), width at level of c 1 133 (130–138); prodorsal shield covering gnathosoma entirely. Stigma on discrete marginal projection of prodorsal shield, laterad of base of tubercle (40 long) bearing v 1. Seta sc 2 inserted anterolaterad of sc 1. Lengths of setae: v 1 40 (39–42), sc 1 17 (16–17), sc 2 35 (33–36), c 1 48 (46–50), c 2 22 (19–24), d 36 (33–39), e 6 (5–6), f 21 (20–22), h 8 (7–8). Distances between dorsal setae: v 1 –v 1 17 (16–18), sc 2 –sc 2 62 (61–62), v 1 –sc 2 34 (33–35), c 1 –c 1 81 (77– 83) c 2 –c 2 115 (110–118), c 1 –c 2 40 (38–41), d–d 45 (44–46), f–f 29 (27–30), e–f 5 (4–5), h–h 19 (18–19). Seta v 1 stout and strongly serrate; seta sc 1 knobbed and with tiny spines; setae sc 2, c 1, c 2 and d stout but flexible (tip bent to different directions in mounted specimens), barbed and knobbed; setae e, f and h barbed and sharp-tipped. Coxisternal seta 1a 7 (6–7), inserted near junction of apodeme 1 with prosternal apodeme; coxal pits 1 b hardly distinguishable, located anterolaterad seta 1 a; seta 2a 7 (6–7) inserted on distal end of apodeme 2; coxal pits 2 b posterolaterad 2 a; seta 3a 7 (7–8), inserted midway between sejugal apodeme and apodeme 3; seta 3 b 5, inserted on distal end of apodeme IV. Prosternal apodeme fused with apodemes 1, but not with apodeme 2, conspicuous from apodeme 1 to level of posterior ends of apodemes 2, widening and fading posteriorly to reach sejugal apodeme, which is continuous, but faded medially. Apodeme 3 slightly arched, transverse, extending from anterior end of trochanter III to level posterolaterad insertion of 3 a. Poststernal apodeme distinct, not bifurcate anteriorly, extending from level of apodeme 3 to level of posterior end of trochanter III. Tegula rounded, 11 (10–11) long and 12 (11–12) wide at base. Anterior edge of metapodosomal plate nearly straight. Posterolateral extensions of coxisternal plates IV approaching but not overlapping each other medially beneath tegula. Setae ps minute (2). Legs (Figs. 3–6): lengths (proximal end of trochanter to distal end of tarsus): leg I 52 (51–52), leg II 53 (52– 53), leg III 54 (51–57), leg IV 36 (36–37). Number of setae (solenidia in parentheses) on femur, genu, tibia and tarsus, respectively: leg I: 4 – 4–6 + 8 (+ 1 ω), leg II: 3 – 3–4 – 5 (+ 1 ω), leg III: 1 + 3–4 – 4. Tarsal solenidion ω of tibiotarsus I 7 (6–7), stout and slightly elongate. Sensory cluster of tibia I incomplete (φ 1 and φ 2 missing); eupathidion k (5) proximal to d 34 (32–35), serrate. Solenidion ω of tarsus II proximal, 7, stout and slightly elongate; seta pl'' absent. Seta d of tibia II 38 (36–40), serrate. Femurogenu IV 25; tibiotarsus IV 15. Lengths of leg IV setae: v´F 7, v´G 8, v'Ti 16 (16–17) and tc'' 22 (21–23); setae v'G and v'F slender and smooth, v'Ti lanceolate and smooth; tc"Ta slender and serrate. Larva and male: Unknown. Type material. Holotype ♀ (specimen number 9515): Serra do Conduru, Uruçuca, Bahia State, Brazil, on Plinia sp. (Myrtaceae), 16 March 2013, deposited at Departamento de Zoologia e Botânica, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo State, Brazil. Paratypes: 2 ♀ (specimen numbers T-MZLQ 3013, T-MZLQ 3014): Ilha do Cardoso, Cananéia (25 °04S; 47 ° 55 W), São Paulo State, Brazil, on Blepharocalix salicifolius (Kunt) O. Berg (Myrtaceae), 16 July 2012, deposited at Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”(ESALQ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, São Paulo State, Brazil. All specimens collected by P. R. Demite. Etymology. This species is named after the eminent acarologist Ronald Ochoa, USDA, USA. Remarks. Nothing is known about the feeding behavior of this species. Tarsonemini species are known as egg parasitoids, algivores, fungivores or phytophages (Lindquist 1969, 1986; Lofego et al. 2005). The feeding habits of species of the genera morphologically most similar to Kaliszewskia are also inadequately known. Fungitarsonemus species have been speculated to feed on fungi, which could also be the case of the species here described, given that the habitats where the types were found are humid, allowing easy development of fungi on leaves. Species of Ceratotarsonemus, Daidalotarsonemus and Rynchotarsonemus are also thought to feed on algae, lichens or on plant leaves.

Galendromimus Muma Galendromimus Muma, 1961: 297; Muma et al., 1970: 58; Chant & McMurtry, 1994: 241; 2007: 137. Chanteius (Deleoneius) Wainstein, 1962: 19 (synonymy according to Chant & McMurtry, 1994). Nothoseius De Leon, 1965: 127 (synonymy according to Chant & McMurtry, 1994). Typhlodromus (Galendromimus).��� van der Merwe, 1968: 63. Kampimodromus (Galendromimus).��� Karg, 1983: 305. Type species: Typhlodromus alveolaris De Leon, 1967 Chant & McMurtry (1994) included four species in this genus, and characterised it by the following attributes: setae s 6 and Z 1 present; setae z 3, S 2, S 4 and R 1 absent; some dorsal shield setae, especially Z 4 and Z 5, elongate, thick and strongly serrate. Three other species are now placed in Galendromimus, including the new species described here. As previously pointed out for Galendromimini, the inclusion of the new species described in this paper in Galendromimus requires that z 3 may occasionally be found in species of this group. Additional characteristics of Galendromimus are: seta Z 1 present; J 2, S 5, JV 3, JV 4 and ZV 3 present or absent (leading to five possible setal patterns in this small genus���Table 1); sternal and genital shields smooth; sternal shield lightly sclerotised; ventrianal shield subrectangular, constricted at level of JV 3, mostly smooth anterior to anal opening and reticulate elsewhere, with four pairs of pre-anal setae (JV 1, JV 2, JV 3 and ZV 2) and a pair of preanal pores of variable position and size; fixed cheliceral digit with few teeth, anteriad of pilus dentilis; leg macrosetae absent [differentiated seta on basitarsus IV of G. (N.) borinquensis, not much longer than neighboring setae]; spermatheca variable; and distal end of peritreme anteriad of j 3 [except G. (G.) alveolaris]. Chant & McMurtry (1994) recognised two subgenera in this genus, Galendromimus (Galendromimus) Muma and Galendromimus (Nothoseius) De Leon. The latter has only one species, G. (N.) borinquensis (De Leon)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Gondim, Manoel G. C., Lofego, Antonio C. & Moraes, Gilberto J., 2014, A new species of Galendromimus Muma from Brazil (Acari: Phytoseiidae), with a review of the tribe Galendromimini Chant & McMurtry, pp. 593-599 in Zootaxa 3835 (4) on page 597, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3835.4.10, http://zenodo.org/record/231010, {"references":["Muma, M. H. (1961) Subfamiles, genera, and species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Florida State Museum Bulletin, 5, 267 - 302.","Muma, M. H., Denmark, H. A. & De Leon, D. (1970) Phytoseiidae of Florida. Arthropods of Florida and Neighboring Land Areas, 6. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, USA, 150 pp.","Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (1994) A review of the subfamilies Phytoseiinae and Typhlodrominae (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology, 20, 223 - 310. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1080 / 01647959408684022","Wainstein, B. A. (1962) Revision du genre Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857 et systematique de la famille des Phytoseiidae (Berlese 1916) (Acarina: Parasitiformes). Acarologia, 4, 5 - 30.","De Leon, D. (1965) Phytoseiid mites from Puerto Rico with descriptions of new species (Acarina: Mesostigmata). The Florida Entomologist, 48, 121 - 131. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.2307 / 3493102","Van der Merwe, G. G. (1968) A taxonomic study of the family Phytoseiidae (Acari) in South Africa with contributions to the biology of two species. Entomology Memoir s, South Africa Department of Agricultural Technical Services, 18, 1 - 198.","Karg, W. (1983) Systematische untersuchung der Gattungen und Untergattungen der Raubmilbenfamilie Phytoseiidae Berlese, 1916, mit der beschreibung von 8 neuen Arten. Mitteilungen Zoologisches Museum in Berlin, 59, 293 - 328. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1002 / mmnz. 4830590203"]}

Galendromimus (Galendromimus) roraimensis sp. n. Demite & Lofego (Figs 1���7) Diagnosis. Females with dorsal shield reticulate, except for a smooth band behind Z 4; z 3 and J 2 present, S 5, JV 4 and ZV 3 absent; all dorsal idiosomal setae set on tubercles. Calyx tubular, slightly inflated near atrium. Description. Female (n= 6). Dorsum. Dorsal shield reticulate, except for a transverse smooth band behind Z4, 275, 294 (275���317) long, 150, 151 (150���155) wide at level of s 4; with two pairs of lyrifissures and four pairs of pores; setae: j 1 19, 19 (17���20), j 3 16, 16 (15���17), j 4 11, 11 (10���12), j 5 11, 11 (10���12), j 6 12, 12 (12���13), J 2 13, 13 (12-13), J 5 9, 9 (9���10), z 2 18, 18 (16���20), z 3 15, 15 (13���16), z 4 25, 25 (23���26), z 5 11, 11 (10���12), Z 1 41, 38 (34���41), Z 4 59, 61 (58���69), Z 5 79, 79 (76���85), s 4 27, 28 (26���30), s 6 34, 34 (30���36), r 3 17, 17 (15���19). Setae z 4, s 4, s 6, Z 1, Z 4 and Z 5 distinctly serrate; j 3, z 2 and z 3 slightly serrate; j 1, j 4, j 5, j 6, J 2, J 5, z 5 and r 3 smooth; all setae set on tubercles. Venter. Sternal shield lightly sclerotised; with three pairs of setae; st 4 on unsclerotised cuticle; distances between st 1 -st 3 58, 58 (57���60), st 2 -st 2 57, 61 (57���67); lyrifissures not visible. Genital shield smooth; distance between st 5 -st 5 59, 61 (58���64). Ventrianal shield subrectangular, constricted at level of JV 3; smooth anterior to anal opening and reticulate elsewhere; 95, 97 (94���100) long, 91, 89 (84���94) wide at level of ZV 2 and 81, 77 (70���83) wide at level of anus; with four pairs of pre-anal setae (JV 1, JV 2, JV 3 and ZV 2) and a pair of pores posteromesad of JV 2. Seta JV 5 12, 14 (12���17). All ventral setae smooth. Metapodal plates not visible. Peritreme. Extending anteriorly almost to level of j 1. Spermatheca. Calyx tubular, curved, 42, 44 (41���47) long, slightly inflated near atrium; the latter small. Chelicera. Movable digit 22, 21 (20���21) long, with a single minute tooth in addition to apical tooth; fixed digit 22, 22 (21���23), with two subapical teeth, distal to setiform pilus dentilis. Legs. Macrosetae absent. Chaetotaxy: genu II: 2, 2 / 0, 2 / 0, 1; genu III: 1, 2 / 1, 2 / 0, 1. Male (n= 1). Dorsum. Dorsal shield pattern similar to female, 215 long and 132 wide. Setae j 1 18, j 3 15, j 4 12, j 5 12, j 6 12, J 2 11, J 5 6, z 2 16, z 3 15, z 4 20, z 5 12, Z 1 30, Z 4 36, Z 5 43, s 4 24, s 6 26, r 3 16. Shape of setae as in female; all setae set on tubercles. Peritreme. Almost reaching level of j 1. Venter. Sternogenital shield smooth. Ventrianal shield subtriangular, smooth, 82 long and 102 wide at anterior corners, with four pairs of pre-anal setae (JV 1, JV 2, JV 3 and ZV 2), and a pair of pre-anal pores; lyrifissures not visible. Chelicera. Spermadactyl boomerang-shaped; shaft and foot 11 and 7 long, respectively. Legs. Macrosetae absent, chaetotaxy of genua II and III as in female. Etymology. The name roraimensis refers to ���from Roraima���, the Brazilian State where the types were collected. Type material. Holotype female: Iracema (2 �� 10 ���N; 61 ��03���W), Roraima State, Brazil, on unidentified Arecaceae, March 30, 2010. Paratypes: three females and one male, same host and locality as holotype; one female, Bonfim (3 �� 21 ���N; 59 �� 49 ���W), Roraima State, Brazil, on Musa sp. (Musaceae), April 29, 2010; one female, Bonfim (3 �� 21 ���N; 59 �� 49 ���W), on Cocos nucifera (Arecaceae), April 29, 2010. All types deposited at Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Escola Superior de Agricultura ���Luiz de Queiroz���, Universidade de S��o Paulo (ESALQ-USP), Piracicaba, S��o Paulo State, Brazil, except the last paratype, deposited at Departamento de Zoologia e Bot��nica, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), S��o Jos�� do Rio Preto, S��o Paulo State, Brazil. All types collected by T.M.M.G. de Castro and A. L. Marsaro Jr.. Remarks. This species differs from all other species of Galendromimini by the presence of dorsal seta z 3. Except for this characteristic, it is very similar to Galendromimus (Galendromimus) sanctus De Leon. Both species lack seta S 5; have the dorsal shield reticulate, except for a transverse band behind Z 4; setae j 4, j 5, j 6, J 2, J 5 and z 5 are short and smooth; j 3, z 2, z 3, z 4, Z 4, Z 5, s 4 and s 6 are longer, serrate and inserted in tubercles; the sternal shield is lightly sclerotised or unsclerotised; the ventrianal shield is smooth anterior to the anal opening and reticulate elsewhere. For this reason, it was included as a member of Galendromimus (Galendromimus) instead of placing it in a new genus., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Gondim, Manoel G. C., Lofego, Antonio C. & Moraes, Gilberto J., 2014, A new species of Galendromimus Muma from Brazil (Acari: Phytoseiidae), with a review of the tribe Galendromimini Chant & McMurtry, pp. 593-599 in Zootaxa 3835 (4) on pages 594-596, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3835.4.10, http://zenodo.org/record/231010

Demite, Peterson R., Gondim, Manoel G. C., Lofego, Antonio C., Moraes, Gilberto J. (2014): A new species of Galendromimus Muma from Brazil (Acari: Phytoseiidae), with a review of the tribe Galendromimini Chant & McMurtry. Zootaxa 3835 (4): 593-599, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3835.4.10

Demite, Peterson R., Mcmurtry, James A., De Moraes, Gilberto J. (2014): Phytoseiidae Database: a website for taxonomic and distributional information on phytoseiid mites (Acari). Zootaxa 3795 (5): 571-577, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3795.5.6

Paraphytoseius orientalis (Narayanan, Khaur & Ghai) Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) orientalis Narayanan et al., 1960: 394 Paraphytoseius orientalis.— Chant & McMurtry, 2003 b: 220; Moraes et al., 2004: 162; Lofego et al., 2009: 51. Paraphytoseius ipomeai El-Banhawy, 1984: 126 (synonymy according to Chant & McMurtry, 2003 b). Paraphytoseius multidentatus Swirski & Shechter, 1961: 114; McMurtry & Moraes, 1984: 27; Moraes et al., 1986: 104 (synonymy according to Chant & McMurtry, 2003 b). Paraphytoseius narayanami Ehara & Ghai in Ehara, 1967: 77 (synonymy according to Chant & McMurtry, 2003 b). Paraphytoseius parabilis Chaudhri, 1967: 266 (synonymy according to Matthysse & Denmark, 1981). Paraphytoseius saturcensis De Leon, 1965 a: 130 (synonymy according to Chant & McMurtry, 2003 b). Paraphytoseius seychellensis Schicha & Corpuz-Raros, 1985: 71 (synonymy according to Chant & McMurtry, 2003 b). Specimens examined: Matão: C. urucurana, VI- 2007 (1); Novo Horizonte: T. chrysotricha, III- 2008 (1); Pindorama: Solanum sp., VI- 2009 (2). Previous records: Argentina (Guanilo et al., 2008 b), Australia, Benin, Brazil, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kenya, Madagascar, Malaysia, Martinique, New Caledonia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Puerto Rico, Reunion Islands, Taiwan, Venezuela and Zaire.

Phytoseius intermedius Evans & MacFarlane Phytoseius (Dubininellus) intermedius Evans & MacFarlane, 1962: 588. Phytoseius (Phytoseius) intermedius.— Ehara, 1972: 170. Phytoseius intermedius.— Moraes et al., 2004: 242; Chant & McMurtry, 2007: 129; Ueckermann et al., 2007: 12; Demite et al., 2008 a: 17. Phytoseius (Phytoseius) yira Pritchard & Baker, 1962: 227 (synonymy according to Denmark, 1966). Specimens examined: Macaubal: P. guajava, XII- 2007 (2); Sales: H. brevispira, IX- 2007 (1); Sto. Antônio do Aracanguá: Miconia sp. 2, XII- 2007 (2); Turmalina: G. ulmifolia, XII- 2007 (2), III- 2008 (11), H. lhotzkyana, XII- 2007 (1), T. casaretti, VII- 2008 (1); União Paulista: C. sellowiana, VI- 2007 (1), IX- 2007 (2), M. fistulifera, VI- 2007 (1), III- 2008 (1). Previous records: Benin (Ueckermann et al., 2007), Burundi (Ueckermann et al., 2007), Brazil (Demite et al., 2008 a), Cape Verde, Democratic Republic of Congo (Ueckerman et al., 2007), India, Japan, Madagascar, Malawi (Ueckermann et al., 2007), Mozambique (Ueckermann et al., 2007), Philippines, Reunion Islands, Rwanda (Ueckermann et al., 2007) and Zimbabwe.

Amblyseius hexadens Karg Amblyseius hexadens Karg, 1983: 316; Chant & McMurtry, 2004 a: 201: 2007: 78. Specimens examined: Mat��o: C. urucurana, III- 2008 (1); Nova Granada: T. casaretti, IV- 2008 (1); Palestina ��� Area 2: A. communis, I- 2009 (1). Previous records: Brazil., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Lofego, Antonio C. & Feres, Reinaldo J. F., 2011, Phytoseiidae (Acari) in forest fragments in the State of S��o Paulo, Brazil, pp. 31-56 in Zootaxa 3086 on page 38, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.205371, {"references":["Karg, W. (1983) Systematische untersuchung der Gattungen und Untergattungen der Raubmilbenfamilie Phytoseiidae Berlese, 1916, mit der beschreibung von 8 neuen Arten. Mitteilungen Zoologisches Museum in Berlin, 59, 293 - 328.","Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2004 a) A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part III. The tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtribe Amblyseiina n. subtribe. International Journal of Acarology, 30, 171 - 228."]}

Euseius sp. Specimens examined: Macaubal: H. courbaril, XII- 2007 (3); T. casaretti, I- 2008 (1).

Euseius citrifolius Denmark & Muma Euseius citrifolius Denmark & Muma, 1970: 222; Moraes & McMurtry, 1983: 138; Moraes et al., 1986: 38; 1991: 131; 2004: 64; Feres & Moraes, 1998: 127; Feres, 2000: 161; Feres & Nunes, 2001: 1254; Gondim Jr. & Moraes, 2001: 74; Zacarias & Moraes, 2001: 580; Ferla & Moraes, 2002 a: 870; 2002 b: 1016; Noronha & Moraes, 2002: 1114; Lofego et al., 2004: 4; 2009: 43; Bellini et al., 2005 a: 37; Chant & McMurtry, 2005 a: 215; 2007: 120; Buosi et al., 2006: 4; Hernandes & Feres, 2006: 3; Guanilo et al., 2008 a: 17; 2008 b: 11; Demite et al., 2009: 47; Feres et al., 2009: 468; Mineiro et al., 2009: 40. Specimens examined: Barretos ��� Area 1: Albizia hasslerii (Chodat) Burkart. (Mimosaceae), XII- 2008 (1), Caryocar brasiliensis Camb. (Caryocaraceae), IX- 2008 (3), Platypodium elegans Vog. (Fabaceae), VI- 2008 (1), T. casaretti, X- 2007 (1), VII- 2008 (3), IX- 2008 (2), I- 2009 (1); A. communis, VII- 2007 (1), I- 2008 (21), IV- 2008 (27), VII- 2008 (12), I- 2009 (3), T. casaretti, X- 2008 (1), I- 2009 (1); Bebedouro: Matayba cf. guianensis, VI- 2008 (1), Z. pohlianum, VI- 2008 (1); Macaubal: P. guajava, VI- 2007 (3), IX- 2007 (1), XII- 2007 (3), III- 2008 (1), Q. grandiflora, XII- 2007 (2), III- 2008 (2), Rhaminidium elaeocarpum Reiss. (Rhamnaceae), IX- 2007 (6), T. casaretti, X- 2007 (3), VII- 2008 (2); Mat��o: A. communis, VII- 2007 (1), Centrolobium tomentosum Guill. ex. Benth. (Fabaceae), XII- 2007 (1), Heliconia sp., XII- 2007 (1), Inga cf. marginata (Mimosaceae), XII- 2008 (5), III- 2009 (4); Nova Granada: A. communis, I- 2008 (1), VII- 2008 (5); Novo Horizonte: A. communis, I- 2008 (2), IV- 2008 (7); Palestina ��� Area 1: Myracrodruon urundeuva Fr. All. (Anacardiaceae), XII- 2008 (1), Qualea sp. (Vochysiaceae), IX- 2008 (1); Area 2: A. communis, VII- 2007 (1), I- 2008 (6), IV- 2008 (16), VII- 2008 (1), Arrabidaea triplinervia (Mart. ex. DC.) Baill. ex. Bureau (Bignoniaceae), III- 2009 (1), Aspidosperma subincanum Mart. ex. A. DC. (Apocynaceae), VI- 2008 (8), III- 2009 (10), D. alata, VI- 2008 (2), IX- 2008 (3), XII- 2008 (3), III- 2009 (2), M. quadrivalvis, VI- 2008 (12), T. casaretti, X- 2008 (1); Pindorama: G. jasminiflora, III- 2009 (1), Myrtaceae sp. 3, XII- 2008 (1); Sales: Annona sp. (Annonaceae), VI- 2007 (1), XII- 2007 (3), III- 2008 (5), Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. (Caesalpiniaceae), VI- 2007 (1), XII- 2007 (2), III- 2008 (1), H. brevispira, IX- 2007 (1); S. J. de Iracema: A. communis, VII- 2007 (1), I- 2008 (2), IV- 2008 (14), I- 2009 (1), Sterculia striata St. Hil. & Naud. (Sterculiaceae), III- 2008 (2), T. impetiginosa, III- 2008 (1), T. casaretti, X- 2007 (4), IV- 2008 (2), VII- 2008 (3); Taquaritinga: A. communis, VII- 2007 (4), I- 2008 (3), X- 2008 (1), P. aduncum, IX- 2008 (1), S. guianensis, VI- 2008 (1), IX- 2008 (1), T. casaretti, VII- 2007 (3), X- 2007 (3), I- 2008 (1), VII- 2008 (1), X- 2008 (1); Turmalina: Acacia polyphylla DC. (Mimosaceae), IX- 2008 (1), A. communis, VII- 2008 (1), I- 2009 (1), A. aculeata, VI- 2008 (19), IX- 2008 (2), G. ulmifolia, IX- 2007 (3), III- 2008 (16), T. casaretti, IV- 2008 (6), VII- 2008 (2), IV- 2009 (3), Zanthoxylum rhoifolium Lam. (Rutaceae), VI- 2008 (6), IX- 2008 (5); Uni��o Paulista: Mabea fistulifera Mart. (Euphorbiaceae), VI- 2007 (12), III- 2008 (7), Protium heptaphyllum (Aubl.) March. (Burseraceae), XII- 2007 (1), Pyrostegia venusta (Ker- Gawl) Miers. (Bignoniaceae), VI- 2007 (6), XII- 2007 (1), III- 2008 (1); Votuporanga: Bambusa sp. (Poaceae), IX- 2007 (1), Myrtaceae sp. 2, VI- 2007 (1). Previous records: Argentina (Furtado et al., 2007; Guanilo et al., 2008 b), Brazil, Colombia, Nicaragua, Paraguay and Peru., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Lofego, Antonio C. & Feres, Reinaldo J. F., 2011, Phytoseiidae (Acari) in forest fragments in the State of S��o Paulo, Brazil, pp. 31-56 in Zootaxa 3086 on pages 40-41, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.205371, {"references":["Moraes, G. J. de & McMurtry, J. A. (1983) Phytoseiid mites (Acarina) of northeastern Brazil with descriptions of four new species. International Journal of Acarology, 9, 131 - 148.","Moraes, G. J. de, McMurtry, J. A. & Denmark, H. A. (1986) A catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae: references to taxonomy, synonymy, distribution and habitat. Embrapa-DDT, Brazil, 356 pp.","Feres, R. J. F. & Moraes, G. J. de (1998) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from woody areas in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 3, 125 - 132.","Feres, R. J. F. (2000) Levantamento e observacoes naturalisticas da acarofauna (Acari: Arachnida) de seringueiras cultivadas (Hevea spp., Euphorbiaceae) no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 17, 157 - 173.","Feres, R. J. F. & Nunes, M. A. (2001) Acaros (Acari, Arachnida) associados a euforbiaceas nativas em areas de cultivo de seringueiras (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg., Euphorbiaceae) na regiao noroeste do Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 18, 1253 - 1264.","Ferla, N. J. & Moraes, G. J. de (2002 a) Acaros (Arachnida, Acari) da seringueira (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) no Estado de Mato Grosso, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 19, 867 - 888.","Noronha, A. C. da S. & Moraes, G. J. de (2002) Variacoes morfologicas intra e interpopulacionais de Euseius citrifolius Denmark & Muma e Euseius concordis (Chant) (Acari, Phytoseiidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 19, 1111 - 1122.","Lofego, A. C., Moraes, G. J. de & Castro, L. A. S. (2004) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Myrtaceae in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Zootaxa, 516, 1 - 18.","Bellini, M. R., Moraes, G. J. de & Feres, R. J. F. (2005 a) Plantas de ocorrencia espontanea como substrato alternativos para fitoseideos (Acari, Phytoseiidae) em cultivos de seringueira Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 22, 35 - 42.","Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2005 a) A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part VI. The tribe Euseiini n. tribe, subtribes Typhlodromalina n. subtribe, Euseiina n. subtribe, and Ricoseiina n. subtribe. International Journal of Acarology, 31, 187 - 224.","Buosi, R., Feres, R. J. F., Oliveira, A. R., Lofego, A. C. & Hernandes, F. A. (2006) Acaros planticolas (Acari) da \" Estacao Ecologica de Paulo de Faria \", Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica, 6, 1 - 20.","Guanilo, A. D., Moraes, G. J. de & Knapp, M. (2008 a) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma from Peru, with description of four new species. Zootaxa, 1880, 1 - 47.","Mineiro, J. L. de C., Raga, A., Sato, M. E. & Lofego, A. C. (2009) Acaros associados ao cafeeiro (Coffea spp.) no estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Parte I. Mesostigmata. Biota Neotropica, 9, 37 - 46.","Furtado, I. P., Toledo, S. E., Moraes, G. J. de, Kreiter, E. S. & Knapp, M. (2007) Search for effective natural enemies of Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae) in northwest Argentina. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 43, 121 - 127.","Guanilo, A. D., Moraes, G. J. de, Toledo, S. & Knapp, M. (2008 b) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Argentina, with description of a new species. Zootaxa, 1884, 1 - 35."]}

Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) sp. Specimens examined: Sales: C. langsdorffii, III- 2008 (1)., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Lofego, Antonio C. & Feres, Reinaldo J. F., 2011, Phytoseiidae (Acari) in forest fragments in the State of S��o Paulo, Brazil, pp. 31-56 in Zootaxa 3086 on page 50, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.205371

Proprioseiopsis cannaensis Muma Amblyseiulus cannaensis Muma, 1962: 4; Moraes & McMurtry, 1983: 132; McMurtry & Moraes, 1984: 29; Moraes & Mesa, 1988: 77; Moraes et al., 1991: 126; 2000: 250. Proprioseipsis cannaensis.��� Muma et al., 1970: 38; Denmark & Andrews, 1981: 148; Kreiter & Moraes, 1997: 379; Denmark et al., 1999: 14; Zacarias & Moraes, 2001: 581; Chant & McMurtry, 2005 b: 15; 2007: 89; Lofego et al., 2009: 53; Mineiro et al., 2009: 42. Proprioseiopsis (Proprioseiopsis) cannaensis.��� Karg, 1989: 116. Specimens examined: Barretos ��� Area 1: A. communis, IV- 2008 (1), Costus sp., XII- 2008 (2); Area 2: P. elegans, VI- 2008 (2); Palestina ��� Area 2: A. communis, I- 2009 (2), IV- 2009 (1), T. casaretti, IV- 2008 (1), IV- 2009 (1); Planalto: Bauhinia sp., VI- 2007 (1); Taquaritinga: S. paniculatum, XII- 2008 (1), III- 2009 (1); Turmalina: D. bipinnatum, III- 2008 (3), Psychotria sp., XII- 2007 (1); Votuporanga: Myrtaceae sp. 2, III- 2008 (1). Previous records: Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guadeloupe, Guyana, Marie Galante, Martinique, New Caledonia, Paraguay, USA and Zaire., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Lofego, Antonio C. & Feres, Reinaldo J. F., 2011, Phytoseiidae (Acari) in forest fragments in the State of S��o Paulo, Brazil, pp. 31-56 in Zootaxa 3086 on page 45, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.205371, {"references":["Muma, M. H. (1962) New Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from Florida. Florida Entomologist, 45, 1 - 10.","Moraes, G. J. de & McMurtry, J. A. (1983) Phytoseiid mites (Acarina) of northeastern Brazil with descriptions of four new species. International Journal of Acarology, 9, 131 - 148.","McMurtry, J. A. & Moraes, G. J. de (1984) Some phytoseiid mites from the South Pacific, with descriptions of new species and a definition of the Amblyseius largoensis species group. International Journal of Acarology, 10, 27 - 37.","Moraes, G. J. de, Mesa, N. C. & Braun, A. (1991) Some phytoseiid mites of Latin America (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology, 17, 117 - 139.","Denmark, H. A. & Andrews, K. L. (1981) Plant associated Phytoseiidae of El Salvador, Central America (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Florida Entomologist, 64, 147 - 158.","Kreiter, S. & Moraes, G. J. de (1997) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Guadeloupe and Martinique. Florida Entomologist, 80, 376 - 382.","Denmark, H. A., Evans, G. A., Aguilar, H., Vargas, C. & Ochoa, R. (1999) Phytoseiidae of Central America (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, 125 pp.","Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2005 b) A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part V. Tribe Amblyseiini, subtribe Proprioseiopsina Chant and McMurtry. International Journal of Acarology, 31, 3 - 22.","Mineiro, J. L. de C., Raga, A., Sato, M. E. & Lofego, A. C. (2009) Acaros associados ao cafeeiro (Coffea spp.) no estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Parte I. Mesostigmata. Biota Neotropica, 9, 37 - 46.","Karg, W. (1989) Neue Raubmilbenarten der Gattuig Proprioseiopsis Muma, 1961 (Acarina, Parasitiformes) mit Bestimmungsschlusseln. Zoologische Jahrbucher Systematik, 116, 199 - 216."]}

Amblyseius novagranadensis sp. nov. Description. Female (Figs 8���12) (7 specimens measured). Dorsum (Fig. 8). Dorsal shield smooth, with a few striae anterolateraly; with 16 pairs of lyrifissures and seven pairs of pores; 317: 318 (315���325) long, 205: 205 (200���215) wide at level of s 4; setae: j 1 20: 22 (20���23), j 3 29: 30 (29���31), j 4 7: 7 (6���7), j 5 6: 6 (5���6), j 6 6: 6 (6���7), J 2 9: 9 (8���9), J 5 6: 7 (6���8), z 2 15: 15 (15���16), z 4 9: 10 (9���10), z 5 7: 6 (6���7), Z 1 10: 10 (9���10), Z 4 45: 45 (44���48), Z 5 78: 79 (73���85), s 4 35: 35 (34���36), S 2 9: 8 (7���9), S 4 7: 7 (7���8), S 5 7: 7 (7���8), r 3 11: 12 (11���12), R 1 8: 7 (6���9). All setae smooth, except Z 4 and Z 5 which are serrated. Peritreme extending forward to the level of j 1. Venter (Fig. 9). Sternal shield smooth, with three pairs of setae and two pairs of lyrifissures; distance between st 1 -st 3 57: 58 (56���60) and between st 2 -st 2 63: 65 (63���67). Genital shield smooth, distance between st 5 -st 5 63: 63 (61���64). Ventri-anal shield smooth, nearly pentagonal, with lateral margins slightly concave posterior to ZV 2; with three pairs of pre-anal setae and a pair of mesad to JV 2; 99: 102 (98���110) long, 83: 84 (82���86) wide at level of ZV 2, 79: 79 (76���82) wide at level of anus. Setae ZV 1, ZV 3 and JV 4 on integument surrounding ventri-anal shield. Setae JV 5 smooth; 40: 41 (40���42) long. Chelicera (Fig. 10). Movable digit 27: 27 (26���28) with three teeth, fixed digit 27: 28 (27���28) with 11���13 teeth. Spermatheca (Fig. 11). Cervix cup-shaped; 5: 6 (5���7) long, atrium nodular. Legs (Fig. 12). With macrosetae smooth and pointed of the following lengths: Sge I 26: 26 (25���29), Sge II 26: 27 (26���28), Sge III 29: 29 (28���31), Sti III 22: 22 (21���22), Sge IV 43: 44 (42���47), Sti IV 23: 22 (22���23), St IV 47: 47 (43���50). Chaetotactic formula of genu II: 2 - 2 / 0-2 / 0-1 and genu III: 1-2 / 1-2 / 0-1. Type material. Holotype female, Nova Granada, on Albertia edulis (Rich.) A. Rich. (Rubiaceae), April 2009, P.R. Demite coll. Paratypes: one female, June 2008, P.R. Demite & A.C. Lofego colls., five females, March 2010, P.R. Demite & A.C. Lofego colls. All paratypes same host and locality as holotype. Etymology. The specific name refers to city of Nova Granada, where the type specimens of this species were collected. Remarks. This new species belongs to the obtusus species group and the andersoni species subgroup. Only two species of the andersoni subspecies group have s 4 Amblyseius leonardi McMurtry & Moraes, 1989 and A. neocrotalariae Gupta, 1978. Females of the new species differ from A. leonardi by having the macrosetae Sge IV and Sti IV smooth and pointed, and Sge IV 1.29 times as long. It differs from A. neocrotalariae by having Sti IV 0.55 times as long, and in the shape of the spermatheca., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Lofego, Antonio C. & Feres, Reinaldo J. F., 2011, Phytoseiidae (Acari) in forest fragments in the State of S��o Paulo, Brazil, pp. 31-56 in Zootaxa 3086 on page 38, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.205371, {"references":["McMurtry, J. A. & Moraes, G. J. de (1989) Some phytoseiid mites from Peru with descriptions of four new species (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology, 15, 179 - 188."]}

Phytoseius kaapre Demite, Lofego & Feres Phytoseius kaapre Demite et al., 2008 a: 22. Specimens examined: Matão: C. glaziovi, IX- 2008 (1), III- 2009 (1); Novo Horizonte: G. uruguensis, III- 2008 (13); Palestina – Area 1: D. hispida, VI- 2008 (3), IX- 2008 (1), X. aromatica, XII- 2008 (2), III- 2009 (32); Sto. Antônio do Aracanguá: D. dentatus, IX- 2007 (1); S. J. de Iracema: T. casaretti, IV- 2008 (2), VII- 2008 (3). Previous records: Brazil.

Transeius bellottii (Moraes & Mesa) Amblyseius bellottii Moraes & Mesa, 1988: 75. Neoseiulus bellottii.— Moraes et al., 2004: 108; Lofego et al., 2004: 7; Feres et al., 2005: 45. Transeius bellottii.— Chant & McMurtry, 2004 a: 187; 2007: 71. Specimens examined: Barretos – Area 2: A. communis, VII- 2008 (1), T. casaretti, IV- 2009 (1); Bebedouro: Campomanesia sp., III- 2009 (3); Palestina – Area 1: M. urundeuva, VI- 2008 (17), XII- 2008 (2), III- 2009 (33); S. J. de Iracema: L. divaricata, VI- 2007 (6), XII- 2007 (4), III- 2008 (21), Rhandia sp., III- 2008 (8); Turmalina: A. communis, IV- 2008 (1), H. lhotzkyana, III- 2008 (1); Votuporanga: Myrtaceae sp. 2, III- 2008 (5). Previous records: Brazil.

Amblyseius chiapensis De Leon Amblyseius chiapensis De Leon, 1961: 85; 1962: 175; McMurtry, 1983: 250; Moraes et al., 1986: 10; 1991: 118; 2004: 19; Moraes & Mesa, 1988: 72; Denmark & Muma, 1989: 94; McMurtry & Moraes, 1989: 185; Feres & Nunes, 2001: 1254; Gondim Jr. & Moraes, 2001: 67; Ferla & Moraes, 2002 a: 869; 2002 b: 1013; Chant & McMurtry, 2004 a: 199: 2007: 78; Lofego et al., 2004: 3; 2009: 42; Feres et al., 2005: 45; Buosi et al., 2006: 3; Guanilo et al., 2008 a: 4; 2008 b: 4. Demite et al., 2009: 47; Mineiro et al., 2009: 40. Amblyseius triplaris De Leon, 1967: 25 (synonymy according to Denmark & Muma, 1989). Specimens examined: Barretos ��� Area 2: S. vinosum, VI- 2008 (7), IX- 2008 (2), III- 2009 (1); Mat��o: T. casaretti, VII- 2007 (1); Nova Granada: Alibertia edulis (L. C. Rich.) A. Rich. Ex DC. (Rubiaceae), VI- 2008 (4), IX- 2008 (2), XII- 2008 (1), III- 2009 (5), G. viburnoides, III- 2009 (13), P. myrtifolia, VI- 2008 (4), IX- 2008 (1), Rubiaceae sp., VI- 2008 (9), IX- 2008 (2), T. casaretti, VII- 2007 (5), IV- 2008 (2), VII- 2008 (2); Novo Horizonte: D. morototoni, VI- 2007 (1), T. casaretti, VII- 2007 (2); Palestina ��� Area 1: Xylopia aromatica (Lam.) Mart. (Annonaceae), VI- 2008 (2), III- 2009 (1); Area 2: Melloa quadrivalvis (Jacq.) A.H. Gentry (Bignoniaceae), VI- 2008 (1); Planalto: Bauhinia sp., VI- 2007 (6), IX- 2007 (3), III- 2008 (2); Erythroxylon sp., VI- 2007 (6), IX- 2007 (2), III- 2008 (1), Miconia sp. 1, VI- 2007 (8), IX- 2007 (1), XII- 2007 (6), III- 2008 (2); Sto. Ant��nio do Aracangu��: Cupania vernalis Camb. (Sapindaceae), VI- 2007 (1), Doliocarpus dentatus (Aubl.) Standl. (Dilleniaceae), VI- 2007 (3), Miconia sp. 2 (Melastomataceae), VI- 2007 (1), IX- 2007 (1), III- 2008 (2), Pterodon emarginatus Vog. (Fabaceae), VI- 2007 (2); Rudgea viburnoides (Cham) Benth. (Rubiaceae), VI- 2007 (2); S. J. de Iracema: P. arboreum, VI- 2007 (1), IX- 2007 (1), XII- 2007 (4), III- 2008 (3); Turmalina: Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. ex. Mart. (Arecaceae), VI- 2008 (2), III- 2009 (1), Psycothria sp., VI- 2007 (1). Previous records: Argentina (Guanilo et al., 2008 b), Brazil, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Peru (Guanilo et al., 2008 a), Puerto Rico, Trinidad and Venezuela., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Lofego, Antonio C. & Feres, Reinaldo J. F., 2011, Phytoseiidae (Acari) in forest fragments in the State of S��o Paulo, Brazil, pp. 31-56 in Zootaxa 3086 on pages 36-37, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.205371, {"references":["De Leon, D. (1961) Eight new Amblyseius from Mexico with collection notes on two other species (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Florida Entomologist, 44, 85 - 91.","Moraes, G. J. de, McMurtry, J. A. & Denmark, H. A. (1986) A catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae: references to taxonomy, synonymy, distribution and habitat. Embrapa-DDT, Brazil, 356 pp.","Denmark, H. A. & Muma, M. H. (1989) A revision of the genus Amblyseius Berlese, 1914 (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Occasional Papers of the Florida State Collection of Arthropods, 4, 1 - 149.","McMurtry, J. A. & Moraes, G. J. de (1989) Some phytoseiid mites from Peru with descriptions of four new species (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology, 15, 179 - 188.","Feres, R. J. F. & Nunes, M. A. (2001) Acaros (Acari, Arachnida) associados a euforbiaceas nativas em areas de cultivo de seringueiras (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg., Euphorbiaceae) na regiao noroeste do Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 18, 1253 - 1264.","Ferla, N. J. & Moraes, G. J. de (2002 a) Acaros (Arachnida, Acari) da seringueira (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) no Estado de Mato Grosso, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 19, 867 - 888.","Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2004 a) A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part III. The tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtribe Amblyseiina n. subtribe. International Journal of Acarology, 30, 171 - 228.","Lofego, A. C., Moraes, G. J. de & Castro, L. A. S. (2004) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Myrtaceae in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Zootaxa, 516, 1 - 18.","Buosi, R., Feres, R. J. F., Oliveira, A. R., Lofego, A. C. & Hernandes, F. A. (2006) Acaros planticolas (Acari) da \" Estacao Ecologica de Paulo de Faria \", Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica, 6, 1 - 20.","Guanilo, A. D., Moraes, G. J. de & Knapp, M. (2008 a) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma from Peru, with description of four new species. Zootaxa, 1880, 1 - 47.","Mineiro, J. L. de C., Raga, A., Sato, M. E. & Lofego, A. C. (2009) Acaros associados ao cafeeiro (Coffea spp.) no estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Parte I. Mesostigmata. Biota Neotropica, 9, 37 - 46.","De Leon, D. (1967) Some mites of the Caribbean Area. Part I. Acarina on plants in Trinidad, West Indies. Allen Press Inc., Lawrence, 66 pp.","Guanilo, A. D., Moraes, G. J. de, Toledo, S. & Knapp, M. (2008 b) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Argentina, with description of a new species. Zootaxa, 1884, 1 - 35."]}

Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark & Muma Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark & Muma, 1972: 23; 1973: 251; 1975: 287; Moraes et al., 1982: 18; 1986: 61; 2000: 245; 2004: 91; Aponte & McMurtry, 1995: 165; Kreiter & Moraes, 1997: 377; Feres & Moraes, 1998: 127; Feres & Nunes, 2001: 1255; Gondim Jr. & Moraes, 2001: 76; Zacarias & Moraes, 2001: 581; Ferla & Moraes, 2002 b: 1013; Chant & McMurtry, 2004 b: 305; 2007: 123; Lofego et al., 2004: 7; 2009: 45; Bellini et al., 2005 a: 37; Feres et al., 2005: 45; Buosi et al., 2006: 5; Hernandes & Feres, 2006: 4; Guanilo et al., 2008 a: 9; Demite et al., 2009: 48; Mineiro et al., 2009: 41. Amblyseius zuluagai.��� Moraes & Mesa, 1988: 79; Moraes et al., 1991: 125. Specimens examined: Barretos ��� Area 1: P. elegans, VI- 2008 (2); Area 2: Arecaceae sp., VI- 2008 (20), III- 2009 (2), Celtis sp., VI- 2008 (20), IX- 2008 (8), Costus sp., VI- 2008 (30), IX- 2008 (18), III- 2009 (3), Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez. (Lauraceae), VI- 2008 (24), III- 2009 (5), T. casaretti, VII- 2007 (1); Bebedouro: Campomanesia sp., VI- 2008 (1), Z. pohlianum, VI- 2008 (7); Macaubal: Ficus cf. guaranitica, VI- 2007 (5), P. guajava, VI- 2007 (9), III- 2008 (2); Mat��o: A. communis, IV- 2008 (1), VII- 2008 (7), X- 2008 (1), I- 2009 (1), IV- 2009 (1), C. glaziovi, IX- 2008 (3), C. floribundus, VI- 2007 (1), IX- 2007 (1), III- 2008 (43), C. urucurana, III- 2008 (17), G. guidonia, VI- 2007 (21), IX- 2007 (7), XII- 2007 (9), III- 2008 (158), Inga cf. marginata, VI- 2007 (6), IX- 2007 (3), M. nigra, VI- 2008 (1), IX- 2008 (1), T. casaretti, VII- 2007 (5), VII- 2008 (7), IV- 2009 (1); Nova Granada: T. casaretti, VII- 2007 (12), VII- 2008 (9), X- 2008 (1), IV- 2009 (1); Palestina ��� Area 1: X. aromatica, IX- 2008 (1); Area 2: M. quadrivalvis, VI- 2008 (1); Planalto: Bauhinia sp., IX- 2007 (2), D. furfuracea, VI- 2007 (1), IX- 2007 (7), XII- 2007 (5), III- 2008 (9), Erythroxylon sp., VI- 2007 (3), IX- 2007 (1), III- 2008 (3), Miconia sp. 1, IX- 2007 (1); Pindorama: G. kuntiana, IX- 2008 (3), XII- 2008 (2), Myrtaceae sp. 3, VI- 2008 (18), IX- 2008 (2), III- 2009 (1); Sales: Annona sp., VI- 2007 (1), IX- 2007 (3), C. langsdorffii, VI- 2007 (6), T. catigua, IX- 2007 (1); Sto. Ant��nio do Aracangu��: C. vernalis, VI- 2007 (1), Miconia sp. 2, VI- 2007 (3), III- 2008 (1); S. J. de Iracema: A. communis, VII- 2008 (1), P. arboreum, III- 2008 (2); Taquaritinga: A. communis, VII- 2007 (7), IV- 2008 (1), VII- 2008 (12), IV- 2009 (1), A. latipes, VI- 2008 (3), III- 2008 (1), P. aduncum, VI- 2008 (2), S. guianensis, VI- 2008 (5), S. paniculatum, IX- 2008 (4), T. casaretti, VII- 2007 (4), VII- 2008 (1), IV- 2009 (1), T. clausenii, VI- 2008 (17), IX- 2008 (4), III- 2009 (3); Turmalina: A. communis, VII- 2007 (3), VII- 2008 (3), IV- 2009 (2), A. aculeata, VI- 2008 (12), Euphorbiaceae sp., VI- 2008 (1), G. ulmifolia, VI- 2007 (2), Psycothria sp., VI- 2007 (6), IX- 2007 (9), T. casaretti, VII- 2007 (3), IV- 2008 (1), VII- 2008 (3), IV- 2009 (5). Previous records: Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Guadeloupe, Honduras, Marie Galante, Panama, Peru (Guanilo et al., 2008 a), Puerto Rico and Venezuela., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Lofego, Antonio C. & Feres, Reinaldo J. F., 2011, Phytoseiidae (Acari) in forest fragments in the State of S��o Paulo, Brazil, pp. 31-56 in Zootaxa 3086 on page 43, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.205371, {"references":["Denmark, H. A. & Muma, M. H. (1972) Some Phytoseiidae of Colombia (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Florida Entomologist, 55, 19 - 29.","Aponte, O. & McMurtry, J. A. (1995) Revision of the genus Iphiseiodes De Leon (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology, 21, 165 - 183.","Kreiter, S. & Moraes, G. J. de (1997) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Guadeloupe and Martinique. Florida Entomologist, 80, 376 - 382.","Feres, R. J. F. & Moraes, G. J. de (1998) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from woody areas in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 3, 125 - 132.","Feres, R. J. F. & Nunes, M. A. (2001) Acaros (Acari, Arachnida) associados a euforbiaceas nativas em areas de cultivo de seringueiras (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg., Euphorbiaceae) na regiao noroeste do Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 18, 1253 - 1264.","Ferla, N. J. & Moraes, G. J. de (2002 b). Acaros predadores (Acari) em plantas nativas e cultivadas do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 19, 1011 - 1031.","Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2004 b) A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part IV. Tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtribe Arrenoseiina Chant and McMurtry. International Journal of Acarology, 30, 291 - 312.","Lofego, A. C., Moraes, G. J. de & Castro, L. A. S. (2004) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Myrtaceae in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Zootaxa, 516, 1 - 18.","Bellini, M. R., Moraes, G. J. de & Feres, R. J. F. (2005 a) Plantas de ocorrencia espontanea como substrato alternativos para fitoseideos (Acari, Phytoseiidae) em cultivos de seringueira Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 22, 35 - 42.","Buosi, R., Feres, R. J. F., Oliveira, A. R., Lofego, A. C. & Hernandes, F. A. (2006) Acaros planticolas (Acari) da \" Estacao Ecologica de Paulo de Faria \", Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica, 6, 1 - 20.","Guanilo, A. D., Moraes, G. J. de & Knapp, M. (2008 a) Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma from Peru, with description of four new species. Zootaxa, 1880, 1 - 47.","Mineiro, J. L. de C., Raga, A., Sato, M. E. & Lofego, A. C. (2009) Acaros associados ao cafeeiro (Coffea spp.) no estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Parte I. Mesostigmata. Biota Neotropica, 9, 37 - 46.","Moraes, G. J. de, Mesa, N. C. & Braun, A. (1991) Some phytoseiid mites of Latin America (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology, 17, 117 - 139."]}

Phytoscutus sexpilis Muma Phytoscutus sexpilis Muma, 1961: 275; De Leon, 1967: 17; Muma & Denmark, 1970: 24; Yoshida-Shaul & Chant 1997: 234; Zacarias & Moraes, 2001: 589; Chant & McMurtry, 2004 b: 307; 2007: 101; Hernandes & Feres, 2006: 4. Typhlodromus sexpilis.��� Hirschmann, 1962: 17. Amblyseius (Phytoscutus) sexpilis.��� van der Merwe, 1968: 161. Specimens examined: Novo Horizonte: Inga cf. vera, VI- 2007 (1); S. J. de Iracema: Rhandia sp., IX- 2007 (1); Turmalina: T. casaretti, VII- 2008 (1). Previous records: Brazil, Cuba, Guadeloupe, USA and Trinidad., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Lofego, Antonio C. & Feres, Reinaldo J. F., 2011, Phytoseiidae (Acari) in forest fragments in the State of S��o Paulo, Brazil, pp. 31-56 in Zootaxa 3086 on page 45, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.205371, {"references":["Muma, M. H. (1961) Subfamilies, genera, and species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Bulletin Florida State Museum, Biological Science, 5, 267 - 302.","De Leon, D. (1967) Some mites of the Caribbean Area. Part I. Acarina on plants in Trinidad, West Indies. Allen Press Inc., Lawrence, 66 pp.","Yoshida-Shaul, E. & Chant, D. A (1997) A world review of the genus Phytoscutus Muma (Phytoseiidae: Acari). Acarologia, 38, 219 - 238.","Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (2004 b) A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part IV. Tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtribe Arrenoseiina Chant and McMurtry. International Journal of Acarology, 30, 291 - 312.","Hirschmann, W. (1962) Gangystematik der Parasitiformes. Acarologie Schriftenreihe fur Vergleichende Milbenkunde, Hirschmann - Ve r l a g, 5, 1 - 80 + 32 plates.","Van der Merwe, G. G. (1968) A taxonomic study of the family Phytoseiidae (Acari) in South Africa with contributions to the biology of two species. Entomology Memoirs, South Africa Department of Agricultural Technical Services, South Africa, 18, 1 - 198."]}

Galendromimus (Galendromimus) alveolaris (De Leon) Typhlodromus alveolaris De Leon, 1957: 141. Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) alveolaris.��� Chant, 1959: 52. Galendromimus alveolaris.��� Muma, 1961: 297; De Leon, 1967: 13; Wainstein, 1962: 19; Muma et al., 1970: 58; Moraes et al., 1993: 89; 2004: 264; Denmark et al., 1999: 83; Zacarias & Moraes, 2001: 583. Cydnodromella alveolaris.��� Chant & Yoshida-Shaul, 1986: 2820; Moraes & Mesa, 1988: 80. Galendromimus (Galendromimus) alveolaris.��� Chant & McMurtry, 1994: 242; 2007: 139; Moraes et al., 2000: 255. Specimens examined: Taquaritinga: T. casaretti, I- 2008 (1). Previous records: Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Jamaica, Martinique, Mexico, Trinidad and USA., Published as part of Demite, Peterson R., Lofego, Antonio C. & Feres, Reinaldo J. F., 2011, Phytoseiidae (Acari) in forest fragments in the State of S��o Paulo, Brazil, pp. 31-56 in Zootaxa 3086 on pages 48-49, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.205371, {"references":["De Leon, D. (1957) Three new Typhlodromus from southern Florida (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Florida Entomologist, 40, 141 - 144.","Chant, D. A. (1959) Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. Bionomics of seven species in southeastern England. Part II. A taxonomic review of family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of 38 new species. Canadian Entomologist, Supplement, 91, 1 - 166.","Muma, M. H. (1961) Subfamilies, genera, and species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Bulletin Florida State Museum, Biological Science, 5, 267 - 302.","De Leon, D. (1967) Some mites of the Caribbean Area. Part I. Acarina on plants in Trinidad, West Indies. Allen Press Inc., Lawrence, 66 pp.","Wainstein, B. A. (1962) Some new predatory mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Parasitiformes) of the USSR fauna. Entomological News, 41, 139 - 146.","Moraes, G. J. de, Alencar, J. A. de, Lima, J. L. S., Yaninek, J. S. & Delalibera Jr., I. (1993) Alternative plants habitats for common phytoseiid predators of the cassava green mite (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae) in northeast Brazil. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 17, 77 - 90.","Denmark, H. A., Evans, G. A., Aguilar, H., Vargas, C. & Ochoa, R. (1999) Phytoseiidae of Central America (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, 125 pp.","Chant, D. A. & Yoshida-Shaul, E. (1986) A new subfamily, Cydnodromellinae, in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 64, 2811 - 2823.","Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. (1994) A review of the subfamilies Phytoseiinae and Typhlodrominae (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology, 20, 223 - 310."]}